NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (codename GN21-X2) is a mid-range laptop GPU. It is based on the AD107 chip and uses the Ada Lovelace architecture. The RTX 4050 Laptop offers 2560 shaders and uses 6 GB GDDR6 dedicated graphics memory with a clock speed of 16 Gbps (effective) and a 96 Bit memory bus. The TGP (Total Graphics Power) can be configured between 35 and 115 Watt (+ 10-25 Watt Dynamic Boost from the CPU) leading to different performance levels. The boost clock depends on the TGP settings and ranges from 1605 MHz (35 Watt) to 2370 MHz (115 Watt). The performance therefore is also highly depending on the laptop and TDP settings.
In our benchmarks, the RTX 4050 stays slightly behind the older mobile RTX 3060 but is clearly faster than the mobile RTX 3050 Ti . Therefore, it is best suited for 1920x1080 gaming at high to ultra settings depending on the game (see benchmarks below).
The RTX 4050 offers 80 tensor cores and therefore supports DLSS 3 including frame generation that can have a big impact in supported games. The raytracing cores however will see less usage, as the RTX 4050 does not offer enough performance for high detail settings and raytracing in demanding games.
The AD107 chip is manufactured on 5nm at TSMC (4N process).
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison The Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU , not to be confused with the A1000 , P1000 or T1000 , is a lower-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 2,560 CUDA cores and 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. It would be fair to say that this is a GeForce RTX 4050 (Laptop) in disguise; consequently, both are powered by the AD107 chip and are fast enough to handle most games at 1080p with quality set to High. The product was launched in February 2024; it leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and the Ada Lovelace architecture. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 35 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.
Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.
Architecture and Features
Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here; under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of proprietary Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.
The RTX 1000 Ada features 20 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 80 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 2,560 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 20%, and you get the RTX 2000 Ada - as long as we pay no attention to clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 1000 comes with just 6 GB of non-ECC VRAM ; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. The VRAM is just 96-bit wide, delivering a not-so-impressive bandwidth of ~192 GB/s.
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards did. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.
Performance
While we are yet to test a single laptop powered by an RTX 1000 Ada as of late February, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4050 Laptop . Based on that, we expect a run-of-the-mill RTX 2000 Ada to deliver:
a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 54 seconds a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 27,000 points around 50 fps in GTA V upwards of 30 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 12.1 TFLOPS" of performance, a downgrade compared to 14.5 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 2000 Ada.
Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 1000 Ada is.
Power consumption
Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is exactly the case with the RTX 1000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 35 W while the highest is 300% higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 1000 Ada can easily be half as fast as the fastest one.
Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 1000 is built with makes for decent energy efficiency, as of early 2024.
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison The Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU , not to be confused with the A2000 , P2000 or T2000 , is a mid-range professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 3,072 CUDA cores and 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. It would be fair to say that this is a GeForce RTX 4060 (Laptop) in disguise; consequently, the former is powered by the same AD107 chip as the latter, and is fast enough to handle any triple-A game at 1080p with Ultra quality settings. Brought into existence in 2023, the RTX 2000 leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve very decent performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 35 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.
Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.
Architecture and Features
Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way is employed to determine what is transparent and what isn't), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.
The RTX 2000 features 24 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 96 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 3,072 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 50%, and you get an RTX 3000 Ada Generation - as long as we disregard clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 2000 comes with 8 GB of non-ECC VRAM; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. Much like it is with the RTX 3000 Ada Generation, the VRAM is 128-bit wide and delivers a decent bandwidth of ~256 GB/s.
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs can potentially prove to be a bottleneck down the line.
Performance
Most 2024 games are playable at 1440p on High with this GPU. That being said, the average RTX 2000 Ada in our extensive database is much closer to the RTX 4050 Laptop than it is to the RTX 4060 Laptop .
Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 14.5 TFLOPS" of performance, a significant downgrade compared to 20 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 3000 Ada Generation .
Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 2000 Ada is.
Power consumption
Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is especially the case for the RTX 2000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 35 W while the highest is 300% higher at 140 W. The slowest system built around an RTX 2000 Ada can easily be half as fast as the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've already seen on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.
Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the Ada graphics card is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series Codename GN21-X2 GN21-X2 Architecture Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace Pipelines 2560 - unified 2560 - unified 3072 - unified TMUs 80 80 96 ROPs 32 32 32 Raytracing Cores 20 20 24 Tensor / AI Cores 80 80 96 Core Speed 2370 (Boost) MHz Theoretical Performance 9 TFLOPS FP32, 0.14 TFLOPS FP64 Cache L2: 12 MB L2: 12 MB L2: 32 MB Memory Speed 16000 effective = 2000 MHz 16000 effective = 2000 MHz 16000 effective = 2000 MHz Memory Bus Width 96 Bit 96 Bit 128 Bit Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6 GDDR6 Max. Amount of Memory 6 GB 6 GB 8 GB Shared Memory no no no Memory Bandwidth 192 GB/s 192 GB/s 256 GB/s API DirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 DirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 DirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 Power Consumption 115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP) 115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP) 115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP) technology 5 nm 5 nm 5 nm PCIe 4.0 x16 4.0 x16 4 Displays 4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a 4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a 4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a Notebook Size large large large Date of Announcement 03.01.2023 27.02.2024 21.03.2023 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com images.nvidia.com images.nvidia.com Predecessor GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 5395 avg: 7980 median: 8531 (23%) max: 9236 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 89% 59% 67% 70% 66% 74% 71% 81% 87% 81% 91% 96% 94% 95% 100% 97%
min: 7813 avg: 8599 median: 8478 (23%) max: 9628 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 89% 59% 67% 70% 80% 74% 71% 89% 87% 89% 91% 96% 94% 95% 100% 97%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 5107 avg: 7751 median: 8152 (17%) max: 9040 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 94% 59% 66% 74% 72% 77% 73% 86% 91% 82% 93% 99% 98% 98% 100% 100%
min: 7410 avg: 8189 median: 8094.5 (16%) max: 9158 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 94% 59% 66% 74% 83% 77% 73% 92% 91% 90% 93% 99% 98% 98% 100% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 511111 avg: 538445 median: 544225 (55%) max: 559999 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 95 W 91% 97% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 110503 avg: 257136 median: 306885 (36%) max: 354020 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 95 W 31% 100% 87%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 25240 avg: 50421 median: 52806.5 (50%) max: 65111 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 71% 70% 58% 62% 81% 84% 85% 74% 86% 100% 85%
min: 51846 avg: 55022 median: 55022 (52%) max: 58198 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 71% 70% 80% 58% 62% 81% 89% 84% 85% 74% 86% 100% 85%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 51138 avg: 125255 median: 132349 (33%) max: 161152 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 75% 58% 39% 76% 88% 81% 81% 84% 100% 100% 89%
min: 97257 avg: 115231 median: 115230 (28%) max: 133204 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 75% 58% 61% 39% 76% 88% 84% 81% 81% 84% 100% 100% 89%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 12382 avg: 18465 median: 19508 (29%) max: 21537 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 86% 58% 72% 74% 74% 73% 73% 87% 90% 81% 95% 94% 92% 95% 100% 98%
min: 18177 avg: 19789 median: 19236 (29%) max: 22505 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 86% 58% 72% 74% 82% 73% 73% 90% 90% 89% 95% 94% 92% 95% 100% 98%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 13591 avg: 21010 median: 22068 (20%) max: 24007 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 94% 58% 73% 79% 75% 75% 74% 87% 92% 82% 96% 96% 97% 100% 99% 99%
min: 20340 avg: 21924 median: 21379 (20%) max: 24596 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 94% 58% 73% 79% 83% 75% 74% 90% 92% 90% 96% 96% 97% 100% 99% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 82888 avg: 277094 median: 273228 (30%) max: 433961 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 41% 77% 100% 48% 84% 68%
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 46236 avg: 50214 median: 50213.5 (25%) max: 54191 Points
GPU TDP 65 W TDP 95 W 85% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 9394 avg: 13655 median: 13488 (16%) max: 16529 Points
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 57% 70% 75% 82% 83% 100% 100%
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 57% 70% 75% 90% 83% 100% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 30772 avg: 42568 median: 43187 (41%) max: 51162 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 65 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 60% 81% 84% 90% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 40055 avg: 77847 median: 88019 (34%) max: 100002 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 65 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 40% 69% 93% 100% 88%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 13881 avg: 25123 median: 26850 (32%) max: 29150 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 84% 48% 70% 65% 73% 74% 86% 86% 84% 94% 93% 91% 93% 100% 95%
min: 25694 avg: 27051 median: 26717 (32%) max: 29077 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 84% 48% 70% 81% 73% 74% 91% 86% 89% 94% 93% 91% 93% 100% 95%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 13339 avg: 28461 median: 30309 (23%) max: 32642 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 94% 42% 64% 78% 76% 75% 75% 87% 90% 81% 95% 98% 97% 97% 100% 99%
min: 26968 avg: 29447 median: 28909.5 (22%) max: 33001 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 94% 42% 64% 78% 82% 75% 75% 91% 90% 88% 95% 98% 97% 97% 100% 99%
3DMark Vantage + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 70238 avg: 77949 median: 77949 (23%) max: 85660 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 140 W 82% 100%
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU GPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 140 W 82% 44% 100%
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 72266 avg: 80330 median: 80330 (44%) max: 88394 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 140 W 82% 100%
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU GPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 140 W 82% 37% 100%
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU 3DMark 06
min: 41211 avg: 48023 median: 48557 (63%) max: 52966 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 140 W 83% 87% 100% 98% 93%
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 140 W 81% 85% 100% 98% 96% 91%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
GPU TDP ? TDP 65 W 100% 44%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 47 avg: 53.1 median: 52 (8%) max: 68 Seconds
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 102% 100% 101% 102% 102% 102% 101% 102% 102% 102% 103% 103% 103% 102% 103% 103%
min: 51 avg: 78.3 median: 53.5 (8%) max: 155 Seconds
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 106% 103% 104% 105% 105% 105% 105% 106% 106% 100% 107% 106% 106% 106% 106% 106%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 25 avg: 29 median: 28 (10%) max: 37 Seconds
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 104% 100% 101% 102% 103% 103% 102% 103% 103% 103% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104%
min: 25 avg: 27.5 median: 27 (10%) max: 31 Seconds
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 104% 100% 101% 102% 103% 103% 102% 104% 103% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom HIP *
SPECviewperf 12 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 173.89 avg: 182.3 median: 180.3 (48%) max: 194.75 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 140 W 92% 100% 90% 48%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 315.35 avg: 333.1 median: 330.3 (37%) max: 356.29 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 140 W 91% 93% 100% 6%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 79.97 avg: 85.8 median: 84.1 (14%) max: 95.04 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 140 W 88% 100% 84% 82%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 103.3 avg: 137.3 median: 138 (23%) max: 169.94 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 140 W 83% 100% 67% 36%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 271.86 avg: 282.3 median: 281.8 (32%) max: 293.61 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 140 W 95% 100% 94% 86%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 46.29 avg: 48.7 median: 49.5 (16%) max: 49.58 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 140 W 97% 100% 100% 64%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 249.3 avg: 259.6 median: 261.9 (38%) max: 265.15 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 140 W 96% 100% 99% 65%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 257.86 avg: 295.3 median: 305.2 (34%) max: 312.95 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 140 W 89% 99% 100% 40%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 155.94 avg: 185.2 median: 191.5 (30%) max: 201.61 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 140 W 96% 100% 78% 82%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 177.8 avg: 184 median: 186 (36%) max: 188.3 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 191.93 avg: 205.4 median: 198.6 (39%) max: 225.76 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 140 W 85% 88% 100% 82%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 18.3 avg: 20.3 median: 20.7 (3%) max: 21.4 fps
GPU TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 100% 97%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 315.31 avg: 342.5 median: 336.7 (41%) max: 381.32 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 87% 86% 100% 5% 5%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 25.7 avg: 28.3 median: 28.6 (8%) max: 30.1 fps
GPU TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 100% 92%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 50.48 avg: 73.9 median: 74.6 (21%) max: 95.91 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 80% 100% 62% 33% 30%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 281.4 avg: 307.3 median: 307 (33%) max: 333.9 fps
GPU TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 93% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 309.59 avg: 334.1 median: 335.8 (36%) max: 355.25 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 92% 93% 100% 82% 88%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 28.2 avg: 29.2 median: 29 (5%) max: 30.7 fps
GPU TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 95% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 46.5 avg: 50 median: 49.4 (8%) max: 54.54 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 88% 91% 100% 52% 54%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 79.3 avg: 87.3 median: 87.8 (30%) max: 94.5 fps
GPU TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 100% 99%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 96.6 avg: 119.8 median: 122.3 (42%) max: 137.93 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 89% 100% 70% 64% 63%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 47.9 avg: 49.3 median: 49.4 (24%) max: 50.7 fps
GPU TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 99% 100%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 79.98 avg: 84.2 median: 82.8 (40%) max: 91.24 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 89% 92% 100% 54% 54%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 76.2 avg: 78.2 median: 78.4 (21%) max: 79.7 fps
GPU TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 97% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 73.7 avg: 83.7 median: 83 (22%) max: 95.09 fps
GPU TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 82% 89% 100% 80% 83%
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU GPU TDP 50 W TDP 140 W 100% 95%
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 15.1 avg: 15.7 median: 15.7 (2%) max: 16.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 140 W 93% 100%
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 148.12 avg: 189.1 median: 189.1 (19%) max: 230.05 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 50 W TDP 140 W 8% 100% 9%
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 9.2 avg: 9.3 median: 9.3 (6%) max: 9.36 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 140 W 100% 98%
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 17 avg: 25.5 median: 25.5 (16%) max: 33.99 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 50 W TDP 140 W 37% 100% 36%
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 138 avg: 146.2 median: 146.2 (21%) max: 154.4 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 140 W 89% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 114.04 avg: 136.5 median: 136.5 (20%) max: 158.89 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 50 W TDP 140 W 89% 88% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 15.5 avg: 16.4 median: 16.4 (2%) max: 17.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 140 W 90% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 14.9 avg: 15.4 median: 15.4 (2%) max: 15.81 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 50 W TDP 140 W 90% 89% 100%
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 59 avg: 64.5 median: 64.5 (29%) max: 70 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 140 W 84% 100%
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 47.16 avg: 58.2 median: 58.2 (26%) max: 69.22 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 50 W TDP 140 W 84% 83% 100%
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 24.9 avg: 26.4 median: 26.4 (17%) max: 27.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 140 W 89% 100%
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 44.65 avg: 47.8 median: 47.8 (31%) max: 50.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 50 W TDP 140 W 52% 100% 58%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 47.2 avg: 49.7 median: 49.7 (17%) max: 52.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 140 W 90% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 46.84 avg: 49.5 median: 49.5 (17%) max: 52.14 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 50 W TDP 140 W 90% 95% 100%
specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6828 avg: 13789 median: 15101 (11%) max: 18124 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W TDP 140 W 38% 100% 83%
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.32 avg: 142.9 median: 154.9 (51%) max: 169.44 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W TDP 140 W 79% 100% 94%
Cinebench R15 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 135.1 avg: 193.6 median: 189.2 (11%) max: 270 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 93% 78% 91% 60% 79% 84% 84% 96% 69% 84% 82% 80% 85% 92% 100% 90%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 173.5 avg: 261.1 median: 259 (15%) max: 353 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 82% 69% 81% 53% 75% 74% 74% 100% 61% 96% 73% 71% 76% 81% 89% 80%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
GPU TDP 65 W TDP 140 W 30% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
GPU TDP 65 W TDP 140 W 30% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
GPU TDP 65 W TDP 140 W 29% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
GPU TDP 65 W TDP 140 W 31% 100%
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GPU TDP 65 W TDP 140 W 33% 100%
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
GPU TDP 65 W TDP 140 W 38% 100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU GPU TDP 65 W TDP 140 W 28% 100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6 avg: 229 median: 233 (6%) max: 884 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 140 W 31% 38% 26% 12% 27% 20% 36% 100% 13% 31% 19% 26% 17% 13%
min: 104.6 avg: 375.2 median: 289 (7%) max: 732 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 140 W 47% 57% 39% 18% 61% 30% 54% 100% 20% 47% 29% 39% 26% 19%
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64 avg: 10.7 median: 3.6 (1%) max: 38.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W 100% 9% 9% 28% 9%
GPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W 100% 9% 9% 9% 28% 9%
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 60815 avg: 77854 median: 79601 (21%) max: 86892 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 82% 74% 82% 87% 81% 87% 90% 85% 94% 92% 92% 100% 96%
min: 70154 avg: 74279 median: 75472 (20%) max: 77212 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 82% 74% 82% 85% 87% 81% 87% 90% 85% 94% 92% 92% 100% 96%
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 4454 avg: 52346 median: 70056 (17%) max: 85084 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 86% 42% 85% 30% 41% 82% 14% 31% 100% 59% 94% 91% 64%
min: 19217 avg: 56406 median: 73055 (18%) max: 76945 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 86% 42% 85% 88% 30% 41% 52% 14% 31% 100% 59% 94% 91% 64%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 2967 avg: 3376 median: 3376 (12%) max: 3785 Samples/s
GPU TDP ? TDP 140 W 100% 78%
GPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 140 W 100% 79% 78%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 8036 avg: 8780 median: 8780 (15%) max: 9524 Samples/s
GPU TDP ? TDP 140 W 100% 84%
GPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 140 W 100% 66% 84%
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 15719 avg: 16011 median: 16010.5 (13%) max: 16302 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 140 W 96% 100%
GPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 140 W 96% 91% 100%
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 54.3 avg: 123.4 median: 122.2 (16%) max: 276 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 102% 123% 120% 120% 118% 119% 119% 114% 114% 116% 109% 109% 106% 107% 100% 104%
min: 75.1 avg: 89.5 median: 81.8 (11%) max: 119.5 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 102% 123% 120% 120% 119% 119% 119% 116% 114% 114% 109% 109% 106% 107% 100% 104%
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.9 avg: 125.8 median: 134.4 (19%) max: 244 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 100% 117% 112% 109% 113% 116% 105% 110% 111% 104% 105% 102% 105% 103% 100%
min: 84.4 avg: 109.1 median: 101.5 (14%) max: 141.5 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 100% 117% 112% 110% 113% 116% 107% 110% 108% 104% 105% 102% 105% 103% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 65.6 avg: 127.2 median: 129.5 (28%) max: 265 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 100% 135% 134% 129% 126% 134% 120% 121% 122% 109% 111% 105% 114% 108% 103%
min: 87.9 avg: 112.5 median: 104.7 (23%) max: 144.9 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W 100% 135% 134% 128% 126% 134% 121% 121% 117% 109% 111% 105% 114% 108% 103%
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.2415 avg: 0.6 median: 0.6 (57%) max: 0.845 fps per Watt
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 140 W 95% 84% 83% 100% 82% 82% 75% 64% 73% 66% 77% 60%
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 140 W 95% 84% 83% 100% 86% 82% 75% 64% 73% 66% 77% 60%
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.2623 avg: 0.6 median: 0.6 (51%) max: 0.874 fps per Watt
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 140 W 97% 60% 73% 100% 71% 81% 76% 65% 73% 67% 73% 59%
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 140 W 97% 60% 73% 100% 77% 81% 76% 65% 73% 67% 73% 59%
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 97.5 avg: 110.7 median: 98.2 (29%) max: 136.4 Watt
GPU TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 90 W 118% 119% 100%
GPU TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W TDP 90 W 118% 119% 119% 100%
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 94.2 avg: 108.7 median: 96.1 (12%) max: 135.8 Watt
GPU TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 90 W 106% 106% 100%
GPU TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W TDP 90 W 106% 107% 106% 100%
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4205 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (2%) max: 0.4984 fps per Watt
GPU TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 90 W 94% 100% 84%
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 32.1 avg: 46.3 median: 46.2 (74%) max: 55.4 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 140 W 100% 71% 73% 90% 71% 70% 88% 82% 85% 92% 81% 92% 83% 84%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU min: 40.7 avg: 44.9 median: 43.3 (69%) max: 50.6 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 140 W 100% 71% 73% 84% 71% 70% 81% 82% 87% 92% 81% 92% 83% 84%
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 2340 avg: 2451 median: 2415 (95%) max: 2550 MHz
GPU TDP 75 W TDP 95 W TDP 140 W 94% 92% 100%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU → 0% n=0 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU → 0% n=0
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K low med. high ultra QHD 4K low med. high ultra QHD 4K The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered 78.1 64.7 43.1 13.5 7.97 1.884 Civilization 7 176.3 132.2 78 49.8 23.4 Monster Hunter Wilds 54.7 45.5 4 Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 70.4 57.5 41.6 28.9 11.3 Indiana Jones and the Great Circle 76.2 52.2 Stalker 2 59.4 49.8 43.6 10.5 7.72 Call of Duty Black Ops 6 116 106 74 71 50 29 Until Dawn 96.4 69.2 48.8 33.8 23.8 12.3 EA Sports FC 25 159 119.9 113.9 86.7 45.6 God of War Ragnarök 83.8 82.3 72.7 67.2 49 21.2 Final Fantasy XVI 54.4 49 42.3 39 26.5 11.6 Space Marine 2 70.6 60.3 58.9 54.4 41.3 20.4 Star Wars Outlaws 52.8 49.5 43.3 35.1 23.4 9 Once Human 105.4 87.8 78.5 48.7 23.8 The First Descendant 133.4 83.5 65.5 56.1 34.6 16.1 F1 24 181.9 182 141 43 26 11 Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 52.1 42.9 21 13.7 4.12 Ghost of Tsushima 79.2 67.4 59.6 45 30.8 11.8 Horizon Forbidden West 75.7 51.9 45 31.6 18.6 Alone in the Dark 173 157 137 54 31 7 Dragon's Dogma 2 62.2 52.9 36 18.4 Last Epoch 148.4 122.8 90.4 48.2 25.6 Skull & Bones 93 76 57 42 21 Helldivers 2 106.5 82.2 74.4 72.1 44.5 17.8 Enshrouded 52 46 38 28 16.2 Palworld 96 74 73 50.6 26 Prince of Persia The Lost Crown 355 354 351 290 127.1 Ready or Not 173 145 101 56.6 26 The Finals 142 124 96 54.6 27.3 Avatar Frontiers of Pandora 54 47 35 23 11 Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 73 92 67 63 41 32 EA Sports WRC 75 70 64 42.9 22 Alan Wake 2 58.9 48 46.7 26.4 13.8 Lords of the Fallen 59 42 30 21.2 8.9 Total War Pharaoh 259.8 177 105 80 61 30 Assassin's Creed Mirage 98 91 67 53 28 113 103 97 76 58 EA Sports FC 24 163.8 144 132.5 100.9 56.8 Counter-Strike 2 166 128 96 79 40.6 Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty 86 70 59 51 30 15 83 63 53 47 30 Baldur's Gate 3 93 77 66 64 42 22 87.1 75.7 67.6 66.1 45.6 Lies of P 158.7 136 117 104 69 34.2 The Crew Motorfest 60 60 60 59 47 25 Starfield 63.8 55 43 36 28 17.4 Armored Core 6 102.8 103 98 85 62 29.2 Immortals of Aveum 55 48 39 26 Atlas Fallen 127.9 113 105 86 63 33.4 Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 80.7 68 46 40 33 15.6 F1 23 207 194 143 43 31 14 202 192 145 47 30 Diablo 4 204 181.6 160 134.2 86.6 43.1 Star Wars Jedi Survivor 74 68 58 51 32 15.8 49 45 42 40 27 Dead Island 2 199 179 134 115 69 40.8 The Last of Us 88 66 55 32 28 6.65 Resident Evil 4 Remake 81 78 72 30 12 Company of Heroes 3 116.4 131 88 87 69 45.4 Sons of the Forest 74 72 70 49 24.5 Atomic Heart 132 111 66 51 38 24.6 Returnal 63 68 63 54 42 26 Hogwarts Legacy 99 79 66 53 39 22.3 101 80 64 53 38 Dead Space Remake 57 56 48 47 30 17 The Witcher 3 v4 110 79 56 49 30 17 High On Life 104.9 108 89 72 43 22.9 The Callisto Protocol 110 85 71 55 39 21 Need for Speed Unbound 51.2 74 56 48 34 18.8 Spider-Man Miles Morales 92 84 76 68 48 26 Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 104 94 71 67 45 31 Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 76 72 67 63 39.1 A Plague Tale Requiem 58.6 53 46 39 28 16.1 FIFA 23 94.3 The Quarry 91 88 72 56 35 10.6 F1 22 192 182 144 47 28 15.9 189 172 129 48 31 Vampire Bloodhunt 219 204 183.9 116.7 54.5 Ghostwire Tokyo 138.2 136.9 135.1 80 36.1 Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 153 126 84 65 43 129 113 79 63 45 Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 100 79 68 62 36 18 101 81 72 65 41 Elex 2 116.3 115.7 103.4 81.4 GRID Legends 181 156 136 112 91 Dying Light 2 105 75 62 41 21 Rainbow Six Extraction 174 141 135 107 56 God of War 117 94 76 53 43 28 Halo Infinite 122.8 104.6 85.9 Forza Horizon 5 175 115 108 49 42 Riders Republic 151 102 87 80 44 Guardians of the Galaxy 144 120 119 113 Back 4 Blood 332 221 166.1 155.3 Far Cry 6 160 129 111 84 58 157 121 104 87 63 Alan Wake Remastered 161.5 118 109 80 F1 2021 285 237 188 101 69 38 353 230 186.6 99.2 74.9 Mass Effect Legendary Edition 150.1 135.1 Hitman 3 193.9 111.4 101 94.2 60.1 Immortals Fenyx Rising 171 112 101 93 Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 184 117 92 70 Watch Dogs Legion 130 118 106 52 35 26 Crysis Remastered 267 152 62 52 35 Flight Simulator 2020 111 72 53 39 29 Horizon Zero Dawn 170 131 114 98 72 39 Death Stranding 185 143 133 129 88.6 Gears Tactics 305 173 115 81 44.8 Doom Eternal 310 185 166 138 92 Borderlands 3 171 139 96 73 50 26 Control 100 74 48 24 Anno 1800 104.8 94.5 79 48.6 45.1 31 The Division 2 130 83 69 53 35 Metro Exodus 199 109 82 64 50 45 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 215 126 115 101 67 33 Strange Brigade 382 193 156 133 82 49 382 207 168 147 101 Far Cry 5 147 115 108 101 70 43 155 117 109 102 70 X-Plane 11.11 131 114 91 85 117 103 81 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 163 104 76 51 29 180 104 75 56 Dota 2 Reborn 163 147 140 131 97 167 151 142 134 The Witcher 3 353 253 146 75 54 45 383 257 159 80 65 GTA V 179 171 156 81 56 60 180 175 166 94 69 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K low med. high ultra QHD 4K low med. high ultra QHD 4K < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 10 35 43 12 56 38 1 26 57 24 3 40 46 11 19 57 23 1 58 21 3 1 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 6 11 1 9 8 2 9 7 5 9 2 1 9 6
log 24. 03:28:52
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11457 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 12424 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 11601 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753320532s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:17:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.021s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11457 +0.018s ... 0.038s
#10 got single benchmarks 11457 +0.052s ... 0.09s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12424 +0s ... 0.091s
#12 got single benchmarks 12424 +0.003s ... 0.094s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11601 +0s ... 0.094s
#14 got single benchmarks 11601 +0.001s ... 0.095s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.095s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.065s ... 0.16s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.16s
#18 Got 2334 rows for game benchmarks. +0.107s ... 0.267s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.267s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 0.279s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.045s ... 0.325s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.325s
#23 return log +0.003s ... 0.328s
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
