HP Spectre x360 16 convertible review: Now with 55 W GeForce RTX 4050 graphics

After recently reviewing the iGPU version of the new Spectre x360 16, we're now ready to check out the GeForce RTX configuration of the same model. Essentially everything else about the laptop remains identical between the two configurations and so we recommend checking out our existing review on the iGPU SKU to learn more about the physical features of the convertible laptop.
Our unit in review comes configured with the 1st gen Core Ultra 7 155H CPU, 55 W GeForce RTX 4050 GPU, 16 GB of soldered RAM, and 1800p OLED touchscreen for approximately $1600 retail. Other SKUs may include double the RAM or a 1600p 120 Hz IPS touchscreen instead, but all have the same Core Ultra 7 CPU and RTX 4050 GPU.
More HP reviews:
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
91.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
91.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.3 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
90 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 19.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
Case
The dGPU configuration is slightly heavier than the iGPU option by about 100 g.
Communication
Webcam

Maintenance
Display
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 385.2 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
96.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng AU Optronics AUO50A3, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP01, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G LP160WQ1-SPB2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -15% | -3% | -5% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.6 | 98.9 -1% | 75.6 -24% | 98.8 -1% | 96.7 -3% | 96.5 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 100.2 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.7 | 94.4 -2% | 77.2 -20% | 89.1 -8% | 84.6 -13% | 84.6 -13% |
Response Times | -6% | -4862% | -630% | -5038% | -3606% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.78 ? | 0.8 ? -3% | 52 ? -6567% | 6.3 ? -708% | 49.4 ? -6233% | 38.4 ? -4823% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.86 ? | 1 ? -16% | 28 ? -3156% | 5.6 ? -551% | 33.9 ? -3842% | 21.4 ? -2388% |
PWM Frequency | 480 ? | 480 0% | ||||
Screen | -7% | -102% | 13% | -88% | -58% | |
Brightness middle | 385.2 | 424 10% | 425 10% | 551 43% | 473.6 23% | 329 -15% |
Brightness | 387 | 425 10% | 406 5% | 524 35% | 456 18% | 310 -20% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 99 0% | 78 -21% | 91 -8% | 87 -12% | 88 -11% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.52 | 0.19 | 0.39 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.73 | 2.37 -37% | 5.8 -235% | 1.7 2% | 5.9 -241% | 3.52 -103% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.95 | 4.97 -26% | 11.03 -179% | 4.1 -4% | 9.37 -137% | 6.96 -76% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 2.55 2% | 7.57 -191% | 2.4 8% | 7.3 -181% | 5.75 -121% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.49 88% | 6600 0% | 2.2 100% | 1.9 116% | 2.137 103% |
CCT | 6133 106% | 6548 99% | 6842 95% | 7260 90% | 7584 86% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.26 | 4.16 | 1 | 0.89 | 1.15 | |
Contrast | 1771 | 1060 | 2493 | 844 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-5% | -1660% /
-943% | -207% /
-108% | -1710% /
-966% | -1223% /
-688% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.86 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
↘ 0.46 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.44 ms rise | |
↘ 0.34 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8623 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance
Testing Conditions
We set Windows and MyHP to their respective Performance modes prior to running the benchmarks below. Both MyHP and Omen Gaming Hub are installed on the system, but most of the important features related to usability and power profiles are tied to MyHP.
Processor
The Core Ultra 7 155H in our dGPU configuration would return lower scores than the same CPU in our iGPU configuration. The deficit can be as wide as 20 percent between the two systems and results would not improve even after several retests. Indeed, when looking closer at the CPU board power draw levels on each configuration, the CPU in our dGPU unit would reach as low as 28 W whereas the same CPU in our iGPU unit would stabilize at a higher power level of 40 W.
HP says it is aware of the CPU "incorrectly throttling during certain workloads" and that a software update is in the works to resolve it. We will add the new results here once the update is live.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=48) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=48) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=48) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=48) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=48) | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=48) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=48) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=48) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=48) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=48) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
Stress Test
CPU clock rates and board power draw when initiating Prime95 stress would reach 3.2 GHz and 65 W, respectively, before dropping to just 1.4 GHz and 28 W a few seconds later to represent a relatively steep performance decline. Core temperature would be as warm as 95 C when Turbo Boost reaches 3.2 GHz and so the slower clock rates are necessary to keep temperatures in check.
Graphics performance is different between Balanced and Performance modes. For example, GPU clock rate and board power draw when running Witcher 3 on Balanced mode would stabilize at 1920 MHz and 39 W, respectively, compared to 2235 MHz and 53 W when on Performance mode. Core temperatures are also warmer when on Performance mode as shown by the table below.
CPU Clock (GHz) | GPU Clock (MHz) | Average CPU Temperature (°C) | Average GPU Temperature (°C) | |
System Idle | -- | -- | 53 | 45 |
Prime95 Stress | ~1.5 | -- | 75 | 57 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | ~1.1 | ~1140 | 77 | 64 |
Witcher 3 Stress (Balanced mode) | ~1.1 | 1920 | 66 | 62 |
Witcher 3 Stress (Performance mode) | ~1.1 | 2235 | 72 | 71 |
System Performance
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (6537 - 6973, n=4) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10044 - 10446, n=4) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (8769 - 9272, n=4) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (8602 - 9624, n=4) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1552 - 1740, n=4) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1459 - 1659, n=4) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1811 - 1930, n=4) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1167 - 1467, n=4) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (278 - 285, n=4) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (255 - 260, n=4) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (416 - 537, n=4) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6720 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=48) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=48) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=48) | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=48) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latency
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Our specific test unit ships with the SK Hynix PC801 instead of the Kioxia XG8. Transfer rates are nonetheless excellent with no notable throttling issues when running DiskSpd in a loop.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
Needless to say, the GeForce RTX 4050 offers massive performance boosts over the integrated Arc 8 configuration. 3DMark scores are roughly 2x higher while CUDA acceleration allows for faster rendering in Blender by almost a factor of 10.
From the perspective of other laptops with the same RTX 4050 GPU, however, the Spectre x360 16 underperforms. The 55 W TGP target is lower than on competing laptops like the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 or Victus 15 which target 130 W and 75 W, respectively. As a result, 3DMark scores are about 10 to 15 percent slower than the average laptop in our database with the same GeForce RTX 4050 GPU.
Power Profile | Graphics Score | Physics Score | Combined Score |
Performance Mode | 17908 | 17248 | 7364 |
Balanced Mode | 15565 (-13%) | 18672 (+8%) | 5277 (-28%) |
Battery Power | 14156 (-21%) | 21326 (+24%) | 5985 (-19%) |
Fire Strike results are inconsistent as shown by our table above. The CPU score would increase on Balanced and Battery modes while the opposite is true for the GPU score even after several retests on a cold state. Again, HP is aware of the issue and says a fix is in the works.