Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarHP Envy x360 Intel i7-1355U Convertible Review: Intel superior to AMD
We tested the HP Envy x360 15 in its AMD version just last year, but Intel processors were already available for the convertible last year. Dell has replaced the i7-1260P Alder Lake processor with the Intel Raptor Lake i7-1355U for this year. The chassis is almost identical to the predecessor and identical to this year's AMD-version of the HP Envy x360 15. Our test device does not offer a dedicated graphics card and therefore relies on the Intel Iris Xe G7 96EUs iGPU.
The focus of the promotion for the new HP Envy x360 15 is the IMAX Enhanced certification. This certificate is only awarded if a system's display and speakers meet the strict quality standards of IMAX and DTS. IMAX Enhanced films, which are available via streaming services such as Prime Video and Netflix, can thus replicate the IMAX cinema experience as best as possible. The starting price of the Intel variants is 1,099 US dollars in the basic version.
In order to assess the performance of the HP Envy x360 15 Intel, we compared the AMD variant model with the identical chassis and display. Furthermore, the model from the previous year, also featuring an AMD processor, was used for the comparison. The Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU is also a possible competitor, as it has the same i7-1355U processor. Other competitors are the Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7, the Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 and the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8.
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.1 % | 10/2023 | HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.8 kg | 18.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 90 % | 09/2022 | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 1.4 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 87.9 % | 06/2023 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.8 % | 10/2023 | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 1.8 kg | 18.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.4 % | 09/2023 | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
| 86.8 % | 09/2022 | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8 | 1.9 kg | 18.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.9 % | 08/2023 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 |
Case - High quality and without real weaknesses
The Intel variant of the HP Envy x360 15 uses the same chassis as the variant with the AMD processor. Since we already dealt with the chassis in detail in our review of the AMD model, we refer to our HP Envy x360 15 AMD (2023) review for more information. However, our HP Envy x360 15 test device with Intel processor came in the Natural Silver Aluminum color. Compared to the Nightfall Black Aluminum of the AMD test device, fingerprints are even less noticeable here.
I/O - Better connectivity with the Intel model
The HP Envy x360 15 Intel offers almost the identical ports as the AMD variant, but has a clear advantage: The two USB-C ports on the right side are also capable of Thunderbolt 4. They are therefore also suitable for charging, but are much more flexible for connecting to different displays and offer significantly higher transfer rates of up to 40 Gbit/s.
SD Card Reader
The SD card reader of the HP Envy x360 15 Intel isn't slow, but unfortunately cannot keep up with the very good result of the HP Envy x360 15 AMD (2023).
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=36, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Communication
The Intel version also uses a WiFi 6E chip. Instead of the MediaTek chip, an Intel chip is installed here, but the performance of the two WiFi modules is almost identical. The performance is therefore still slightly below average compared to other convertibles.
Webcam
The built-in webcam delivers a minimally worse image than that of the AMD variant. However, the 5 MP sensor still provides a picture quality that is superior to most competitors. IR and Windows Hello are also on board and so are the other additional functions of the HP software.
Accessories and warranty - Pen is also missing from the Intel variant
Packaging and accessories for the HP Envy x360 15 Intel are identical to the AMD version. The input pen, which can be seen in many product photos, is thus not available here either. An alternative, such as the HP Active Pen, is available for 33 dollars on Amazon.
The environmental strategy for the packaging is also questionable for the Intel model. Instead of using environmentally friendly packaging everywhere, the cable organizer is made of cardboard, but the power supply unit is shrink-wrapped in foil.
In the US, HP offers a 1-year warranty for the convertible.
Maintenance - base plate fixed with only 4 screws
The base plate of the HP Envy x360 15 Intel (2023) is attached with only four screws and is therefore very easy to loosen. However, picks and suction cups are recommended to get under the panel and loosen the fastening clips. We had significantly more problems removing the bottom panel of the AMD version of the convertible. Since the chassis is basically identical, accessibility seems to differ from device to device. Inside, the M.2-2280 PCIe slot and the WiFi module can be replaced. The battery can also be removed with only 5 screws.
Input devices - Very good overall package
Keyboard and trackpad do not differ compared to the AMD variant. More details can be found in our review of the HP Envy x360 15 AMD (2023).
Display - OLED with minor problems
Both the HP Envy x360 15 (2023) with Intel processor and the variant with AMD processor have the same OLED display from Samsung. However, the comparison with the HP Envy x360 15 AMD shows differences between the models. The average brightness of just under 380 nits is very similar and more than solid.
However, it turns out that the OLED panel of the Intel variant delivers worse average DeltaE values both before and after calibration. The color values are 4.7 before calibration and 3.8 after calibration. For comparison: the AMD variant was already at a value of 3.1 before calibration and could be improved to 2.4 by calibration. The differences were similar for the average DeltaE values for the greyscales. The Intel model was 5.2 before calibration and 2.9 after calibration. The AMD model was 2.9 before calibration and improved to 0.6. It could be that the AMD iGPU can drive the display minimally better than the Intel iGPU.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 377.48 cd/m²
Contrast: 7604:1 (Black: 0.05 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.79
ΔE Greyscale 6.62 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93.76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.82% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.43% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng Samsung SDC416C, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng Samsung SDC416C, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx BOE08A8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU SDC ATNA33AA06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 3% | -52% | -12% | 3% | -52% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 96.43 | 99.93 4% | 99.9 4% | 39.6 -59% | 77.2 -20% | 99.6 3% | 39.8 -59% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.82 | 100 1% | 100 1% | 58.5 -41% | 99.6 1% | 100 1% | 58 -41% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 93.76 | 95.51 2% | 97.2 4% | 40.9 -56% | 77.4 -17% | 97.1 4% | 41.1 -56% |
| Response Times | 111% | 251% | -1047% | -1342% | 29% | -725% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3 ? | 3 ? -0% | 1 ? 67% | 43.6 ? -1353% | 53.5 ? -1683% | 1.9 ? 37% | 30.2 ? -907% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 3 ? | 20 ? -567% | 1 ? 67% | 25.2 ? -740% | 33 ? -1000% | 2.1 ? 30% | 19.3 ? -543% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 500 ? 900% | 360 ? 620% | 60 ? 20% | |||
| Screen | 3% | 22% | -93% | -74% | 18% | -94% | |
| Brightness middle | 380.2 | 384 1% | 386 2% | 297.8 -22% | 532.4 40% | 367.5 -3% | 335.2 -12% |
| Brightness | 381 | 380 0% | 389 2% | 271 -29% | 502 32% | 370 -3% | 316 -17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 98 0% | 81 -17% | 91 -7% | 98 0% | 86 -12% |
| Black Level * | 0.05 | 0.05 -0% | 0.05 -0% | 0.35 -600% | 0.48 -860% | 0.29 -480% | |
| Contrast | 7604 | 7680 1% | 7720 2% | 851 -89% | 1109 -85% | 1156 -85% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.68 | 4.68 -0% | 2.6 44% | 5.16 -10% | 2.33 50% | 4.61 1% | 7.49 -60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.06 | 7.06 -0% | 4.8 32% | 19.76 -180% | 5.99 15% | 7.68 -9% | 22.25 -215% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.79 | 3.79 -0% | 1.8 53% | 2.28 40% | 0.92 76% | 0.66 83% | 2.17 43% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.62 | 5.2 21% | 2.3 65% | 2.2 67% | 1.6 76% | 2.7 59% | 6.9 -4% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.18 101% | 2.21 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 7651 85% | 7651 85% | 6121 106% | 6678 97% | 6314 103% | 6079 107% | 5988 109% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 39% /
24% | 92% /
64% | -397% /
-221% | -476% /
-242% | 17% /
17% | -290% /
-175% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 50 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Performance - Intel vs. AMD
With the 2023 model of the HP Envy x360 15 Intel, the manufacturer relies on a 13th generation processor that replaces the Intel Core i7-1260P of the previous year's model. The test device also does not have a dedicated graphics card and instead relies on the Intel Iris XE Graphics G7 96EUs iGPU.
Testing conditions
In addition to the Windows power modes, further settings for the TDP of the convertible can be made via the HP Command Center. For our test, the Performance mode was selected in the HP Command Center and the Windows performance settings. Without the HP Command Center, the device's maximum performance cannot be exploited.
As with the AMD variant of the convertible, the HP Command Center offers four different performance modes. Unlike the AMD model, however, the TDP only changes in three of the four modes. In Cooling and Quiet mode, the TDP remains the same.
| Performance | Balanced | Cooling | Quiet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU PL1 (HWInfo) | 30 Watt | 25 Watt | 12 Watt | 12 Watt |
| CPU PL2 (HWInfo) | 46 Watt | 46 Watt | 28 Watt | 28 Watt |
Processor
The Intel version of the HP Envy x360 15 (2023) uses the Core i7-1355U, a high-end processor based on Raptor-Lake. The CPU performance is exactly on par with an average notebook in our database that is equipped with the same chip. Compared to the Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU, which also uses this processor, the convertible performs two percent better. The AMD version performed almost four percent better overall.
However, the comparison also shows that the HP Envy x360 15 Intel performs significantly better in the single-core benchmarks than the Envy x360 15 with AMD processor. In the single-core benchmark Cinebench R20, for example, the Core i7-1355U delivers a 22 percent better result. The multicore performance of the model with the AMD chip is higher, as expected. For users who frequently use multi-threaded applications, the AMD variant is therefore recommended, while the Intel variant is better suited for single-threaded applications.
In the Cinebench R15 multi-thread test, the HP Envy x360 15 Intel struggles and drops sharply after the first run. From the thirteenth run, the performance drops slightly again, but then rises again. The Intel chip has a slightly higher temperature of 81 °C (177.8 °F). The AMD version of the model had an average temperature of just under 79 °C (174.2 °F). The average clock speed of the HP Envy x360 15 Intel is 2.6 GHz in the Cinebench R15 loop.
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (6936 - 10252, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1687 - 1889, n=18) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average of class Convertible (307 - 1970, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2849 - 3907, n=18) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (654 - 725, n=18) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average of class Convertible (116.8 - 755, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1206 - 1735, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (237 - 267, n=18) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Convertible (193 - 3620, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (328 - 503, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (7703 - 72400, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (30255 - 42092, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5301 - 5911, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average of class Convertible (2046 - 6417, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (7507 - 9328, n=18) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1678 - 1872, n=18) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average of class Convertible (319 - 1981, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.61 - 20.1, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (7.83 - 11.4, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| Average of class Convertible (42 - 223, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (41.1 - 108.6, n=18) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.967, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (0.4481 - 0.832, n=18) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Average of class Convertible (109 - 25226, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5673 - 8424, n=18) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Average of class Convertible (2644 - 106512, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (29580 - 42706, n=18) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (121 - 4764, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1529 - 2200, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Average of class Convertible (3256 - 120368, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21547 - 66907, n=18) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Average of class Convertible (549 - 14835, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (4045 - 5426, n=18) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Average of class Convertible (1420 - 56839, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (14596 - 21627, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average of class Convertible (191 - 169089, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (31432 - 75408, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1088, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (454 - 684, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Average of class Convertible (59 - 13175, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2991 - 4453, n=18) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21800 - 46154, n=18) | |
| Average of class Convertible (2185 - 52599, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
System performance
Compared to an average convertible, the HP Envy x360 15 Intel achieves solid results here. However, the HP Envy x360 15 with AMD processor is almost ten percent better in the PCMark 10 benchmark. The Crossmark benchmark once again shows the better single-core performance of the Intel chip, so that the convertible delivers a 17 percent better result than its AMD counterpart. However, the ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU with the identical processor performs better in both the PCMark 10 benchmark and the Crossmark benchmark, even though it is a 14-inch model that actually offers less space for heat dissipation due to the smaller case.
The convertible also does solidly in the AIDA64 benchmark and is able to achieve a 39 percent better result than the HP Envy x360 AMD. However, since the ThinkBook performs better here as well, the Core i7-1355U in the HP Envy x360 15 Intel (2023) cannot fully unleash itself.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5455 - 5933, n=15) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10203 - 11822, n=15) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6763 - 7536, n=15) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5723 - 6712, n=15) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1478 - 1643, n=15) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average of class Convertible (285 - 1912, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1444 - 1665, n=15) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average of class Convertible (310 - 1790, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1563 - 1732, n=15) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1217 - 1681, n=15) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average of class Convertible (204 - 1868, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5687 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average of class Convertible (14439 - 95631, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (35017 - 71600, n=18) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Average of class Convertible (12706 - 87812, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (38551 - 73377, n=18) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (35910 - 93342, n=18) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average of class Convertible (10177 - 93451, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1355U (72.2 - 346, n=18) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| Average of class Convertible (10.2 - 260, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latency
LatencyMon shows significantly fewer DPC problems with the HP Envy x360 15 Intel than with the AMD variant. However, the result is still not ideal and thus the Intel variant is also not well suited for the use of real-time audio software. However, the situation can change at any time with future BIOS and driver updates.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
The storage device installed in the HP Envy x360 15 Intel delivers below-average performance compared to other convertibles. Although the speed should be sufficient for most users and not noticeable in everyday use, the comparison with the AMD variant shows a speed difference of almost 48 percent. It is a pity that HP did not use the same PCIe 4.0 M.2 SSD from Western Digital. Instead, an Intel M.2 SSD is installed here.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card - Intel Iris Xe vs. Radeon RX Vega
In our HP Envy x360 15 AMD review, we criticized the manufacturer for not including a CPU with the new, more powerful AMD iGPUs. The comparison with this Intel test device shows why this criticism is justified. The Iris XE Graphics G7 96 EUs iGPU of the HP Envy x360 15 Intel Convertible performs a good eleven percent better than the AMD iGPU in the synthetic benchmarks.
However, those with higher demands on the graphics can also choose a version of the HP Envy x360 15 that combines the Intel Core i7-1355U with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050. The convertible will not be a real gamer even with this dedicated graphics card, but the performance is much higher than with the otherwise used iGPUs.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7017 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21584 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4963 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1795 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Gaming Performance
In most games, the HP Envy x360 15 Intel performs minimally better than its AMD counterpart. The performance difference is so small that the two devices do not differ noticeably here. However, the comparison with the Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU, which also has the Core i7-1355U installed, again shows the limits of the Intel processor in the HP Envy x360. The ThinkBook achieves an eight percent better result.
A look at the competitor Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 also shows what a convertible with the stronger AMD Radeon 680M or 780M is capable of. The iGPU of the Lenovo convertible is 50 per cent better on average.
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| Average of class Convertible (8.5 - 123.3, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| Average of class Convertible (5.98 - 114.3, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
| GTA V (2015) | 110 | 95 | 24 | 10 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 97 | 58 | 26 | 15 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 105.8 | 81.3 | 62.1 | 54.7 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 46 | 24 | 17 | 12 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 52.1 | 28.9 | 30 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 91 | 39.1 | 31.1 | 25.1 |
Emissions - Minimally quieter with Intel
Noise
Like the AMD variant, the HP Envy x360 15 Intel is also fairly quiet under low to medium load. Compared to other convertibles, the test device performs well and does not show any conspicuous noise. The average load noise of 27 dB(A) is even better than that of the AMD counterpart and is only beaten by the HP Envy x360 15 2022. The maximum noise development under load is also slightly lower with the Intel model than with the AMD variant and of the competitors we selected, only the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 is quieter.
This makes the HP Envy x360 15 Intel Convertible ideal for working in a library or office. Since the device does not get particularly loud even under load, even more demanding applications can be used comparatively quietly.
In the test, however, it was noticeable that the device automatically ramps up when placed on the lap and always becomes at least 35 dB(A) loud. Therefor, the usage recommendation applies only to tables or other hard surfaces.
We did not notice any coil whine or other electronic noises.
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25.8 / 25.8 / 25.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 27.2 / 40.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.8 dB(A) | ||
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng Vega 8, R7 7730U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02 | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx Vega 8, R7 5825U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | -10% | 9% | -3% | -3% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 25.8 | 25.8 -0% | 24.5 5% | 22.7 12% | 24.1 7% | 24.3 6% | 23.1 10% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25.8 | 25.9 -0% | 24.5 5% | 22.7 12% | 24.3 6% | 24.3 6% | 23.3 10% |
| Idle Average * | 25.8 | 25.9 -0% | 24.5 5% | 22.7 12% | 24.3 6% | 24.3 6% | 23.3 10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.8 | 25.9 -0% | 28.1 -9% | 22.7 12% | 24.3 6% | 24.3 6% | 23.3 10% |
| Load Average * | 27.2 | 32.2 -18% | 42.8 -57% | 23.3 14% | 36.3 -33% | 38.2 -40% | 37.3 -37% |
| Load Maximum * | 40.2 | 40.37 -0% | 42.8 -6% | 43.4 -8% | 44.5 -11% | 41.8 -4% | 38.6 4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.8 | 43.4 | 44.5 | 41.9 | 38.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The Intel processor of the HP Envy x360 15 produces a much higher temperature development than we measured in the AMD counterpart of the convertible. At its peak, the right upper side of the notebook heats up to 34 °C (93.2 °F) in idle mode. This means that the average temperature of the Intel variant is a good 4 °C higher than that of the AMD variant. Under load, however, the temperature differences become relatively minor. Here, the peak temperature on the underside is only just under 3 °C higher than on the HP Envy x360 AMD. The average temperature under load is only 0.7 °C higher at 37.8 °C (100 °F). The temperatures thus always remain within an acceptable range and should not be annoying.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.5 °C / 88.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-3.4 °C / -6.1 F).
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 8% | 11% | 16% | 4% | 14% | 5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 37.8 | 42.3 -12% | 38.5 -2% | 36.2 4% | 40.8 -8% | 34.2 10% | 39.4 -4% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 43.1 | 45.4 -5% | 40.3 6% | 37.8 12% | 40 7% | 35.8 17% | 38.8 10% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 34 | 26.2 23% | 27.9 18% | 25.4 25% | 30.4 11% | 28.6 16% | 31.2 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 35.1 | 26.6 24% | 27.8 21% | 26.6 24% | 32.8 7% | 30.4 13% | 32.8 7% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power management - Intel more economical than AMD
Power consumption
The power consumption of the HP Envy x360 Intel averages 6.4 watts in idle mode and is thus a good 1.4 watts lower than that of the AMD variant. However, the Intel model's maximum power consumption of 12.5 watts is significantly higher. The Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU, which uses the same processor and also has an OLED display, behaves strikingly similar here. Possibly the AMD processor can regulate the energy peaks of the OLED display better.
Under load, the HP Envy x360 Intel consumes an average of 41.7 watts, which is slightly less than the AMD variant. The differences are most obvious in the Witcher 3 Ultra test. Here, the Intel variant consumes only 28.2 watts, while the AMD model draws 41.7 watts. However, the AMD convertible also performs slightly better in the Witcher 3 Ultra test and achieves higher average FPS.
Under maximum load, the HP Envy x360 Intel consumes 64.3 watts, which means that the 65-watt power supply is completely sufficient and there is no discharge.
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
| Idle | 5.98 / 6.42 / 12.55 Watt |
| Load |
41.7 / 64.3 Watt |
   
| |
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng R7 7730U, Vega 8, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -12% | -6% | 1% | -7% | -12% | -17% | -3% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.98 | 5.1 15% | 5.78 3% | 3.9 35% | 4.2 30% | 7.2 -20% | 8 -34% | 5.26 ? 12% | 5.44 ? 9% |
| Idle Average * | 6.42 | 8.2 -28% | 7.84 -22% | 7.2 -12% | 6.9 -7% | 7.9 -23% | 10.6 -65% | 8.46 ? -32% | 8.27 ? -29% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.55 | 8.7 31% | 7.98 36% | 7.3 42% | 7.8 38% | 12.7 -1% | 10.7 15% | 10.7 ? 15% | 10.8 ? 14% |
| Load Average * | 41.7 | 51.4 -23% | 42.3 -1% | 46.7 -12% | 46 -10% | 37.6 10% | 46.8 -12% | 44.8 ? -7% | 46.7 ? -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 28.2 | 46.3 -64% | 41.7 -48% | 41.1 -46% | 51.9 -84% | 39.1 -39% | 27.7 2% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 64.3 | 64.8 -1% | 65 -1% | 64.8 -1% | 68.2 -6% | 65 -1% | 68.3 -6% | 66.8 ? -4% | 65.4 ? -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
Battery life
The battery life of the HP Envy x360 Intel is significantly better than that of its AMD counterpart. On average, the battery life is 24 percent better and 16 percent better compared to the overall average of the convertibles. In our WLAN test with adjusted brightness, the battery lasted 9 hours and 36 minutes. At maximum brightness, 6 hours and 27 minutes were still possible. The AMD counterpart only managed 8 hours 47 minutes and 5 hours 43 minutes, respectively.
The HP Envy x360 Intel also achieved good results under load and lasted 2 hours and 53 minutes in our test with BattteryEater, over an hour longer than the AMD model. The value under load is also very good in comparison with the competitors we selected. No other convertible lasted anywhere near as long.
| HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 71 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng R7 7730U, Vega 8, 55 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -18% | -24% | -18% | -31% | -36% | -16% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 576 | 584 1% | 527 -9% | 612 6% | 555 -4% | 481 -16% | 567 ? -2% |
| Load | 173 | 110 -36% | 107 -38% | 100 -42% | 73 -58% | 76 -56% | 121.7 ? -30% |
| H.264 | 762 | 769 ? | |||||
| Reader / Idle | 1198 | 1423 | 927 | 1112 ? |
Pros
Cons
Conclusion - Intel variant offers better single-core performance, graphics and battery life, but weaknesses in the display
The HP Envy x360 15 Intel is in a neck-and-neck race with the otherwise identical AMD variant. The processor offers advantages in single-core applications, but lags somewhat behind in multi-core performance. The chassis is identical to the AMD counterpart, so an excellent case is used here that feels high-quality and does not give in at any point.
The display is also the same excellent OLED, but unfortunately the HP Envy x360 Intel does not achieve the very good color space coverage. We suspect that AMD's iGPU drives the screen slightly better than the Intel iGPU. Professional photographers and videographers should therefore go for the AMD variant. Nevertheless, the OLED display is ideal for films and series and the IMAX Enhanced certification shows that the picture is optimized for corresponding IMAX Enhanced films and can display them as intended.
The advantage of the Intel processor, on the other hand, is that two Thunderbolt 4 are installed, which makes the already very good equipment of the AMD model almost perfect. The Thunderbolt ports are both on the same side, but the dedicated full-size SD card reader and HDMI 2.1 port are a welcome compensation.
Probably the biggest advantage of the HP Envy x360 15 Intel is the battery life. The Intel model offers significantly longer runtimes than the AMD variant and very good results, especially under load. The test device with Intel iGPU also beats the HP Envy x360 15 AMD in both the synthetic tests and the gaming tests.
The HP Envy x360 15 Intel Convertible represents a really good overall package and can outperform the AMD variant in many aspects.
The decision for the HP Envy x360 with Intel or AMD processor thus depends entirely on the individual requirements. For a more accurate display and better multi-core performance, the AMD variant is recommended, while the Intel model scores in terms of single-core performance, battery life, power management, connectivity and graphics performance.
Price and availability
In HP's US webstore, a configuration identical to our test variant is priced at $1,099.99.
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng
-
10/04/2023 v7
Philip Macdonald
More articles related to this device
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng (Envy x360 15 Series)Related Articles
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
