Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Intel Core i7-8750H

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is a powerful Phoenix family APU that saw the light of day in H1 2023. Its 8 cores are powered by the Zen 4 architecture and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. 4.0 GHz is the base clock speed and the highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.2 GHz.

The 7940HS introduces Ryzen AI which is AMD's answer to Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies. The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is set to give applications such as DaVinci Resolve and Photoshop quite a bit of generative AI magic.

More importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

The 7940HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600, including ECC-enabled memory). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7940HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-12900HK and also, somewhat disappointingly, the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY is among the fastest laptops built around the 7940HS that we know of. It can be about 15% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding most video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1, but more importantly it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 7940HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-8750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8750H

The Intel Core i7-8750H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and will be announced early 2018. The processor clocks at between 2.2 and 4.1 GHz (4 GHz with 4 cores, 3.9 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7820HQ (2.9 - 3.9 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i7-8850H is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 7940HSIntel Core i7-8750H
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Coffee Lake-H
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)Intel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H « 2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz2200 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache8 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 166 / 12
TDP35 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm14 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)
NPU / AI10 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7940HS
40.8 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8750H
28.7 pt (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102.9     avg: 106     median: 107 (60%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 824     avg: 919     median: 935 (17%)     max: 972 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15556     avg: 16801     median: 16907 (16%)     max: 18131 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1733     avg: 1784     median: 1789 (75%)     max: 1832 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 679     avg: 699     median: 702 (76%)     max: 714 Points
min: 403     avg: 411.8     median: 412.5 (45%)     max: 418 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6277     avg: 6575     median: 6571 (16%)     max: 7111 Points
min: 2142     avg: 2377     median: 2336.5 (6%)     max: 2707 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2470     avg: 2665     median: 2659 (17%)     max: 2848 Points
min: 863     avg: 1113     median: 1116 (7%)     max: 1251 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 258     avg: 281.1     median: 283 (78%)     max: 288 Points
min: 163     avg: 172     median: 173 (48%)     max: 177 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.8     avg: 30.4     median: 30.5 (39%)     max: 30.88 Points
min: 9.54     avg: 12.2     median: 12.3 (16%)     max: 13.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.34     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (80%)     max: 3.46 Points
min: 1.89     avg: 2     median: 2 (47%)     max: 2 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7798     avg: 7866     median: 7837 (47%)     max: 7963 Points
min: 6236     avg: 6479     median: 6471 (39%)     max: 6645 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47982     avg: 48859     median: 48751 (35%)     max: 49845 Points
min: 29664     avg: 33163     median: 33595 (24%)     max: 35307 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 84721     avg: 86849     median: 87296 (56%)     max: 88529 Points
min: 33944     avg: 42290     median: 43494 (28%)     max: 46384 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14232     avg: 14421     median: 14300 (17%)     max: 14731 Points
min: 8472     avg: 8542     median: 8498 (10%)     max: 8665 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 66.801     avg: 87.3     median: 97 (1%)     max: 98.222 s
min: 125.5     avg: 157.5     median: 156.8 (2%)     max: 180.5 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.648     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.699 s
min: 4.35     avg: 7.1     median: 5.5 (1%)     max: 16.26 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7439     avg: 7503     median: 7490 (12%)     max: 7580 Points
5310 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66408     avg: 70800     median: 70707 (41%)     max: 73434 MIPS
min: 28826     avg: 30674     median: 31144 (18%)     max: 33257 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6310     avg: 6614     median: 6642 (78%)     max: 6776 MIPS
min: 4599     avg: 4621     median: 4629 (55%)     max: 4630 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 140.8     avg: 145.3     median: 144.2 (4%)     max: 150.8 fps
min: 64.2     avg: 67.2     median: 67.2 (2%)     max: 70.2 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 288     avg: 295     median: 292.5 (7%)     max: 304.5 fps
min: 193.5     avg: 200.3     median: 200.3 (5%)     max: 207.1 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.1     avg: 21.1     median: 21 (37%)     max: 22.6 fps
min: 7.56     avg: 8.2     median: 7.8 (14%)     max: 9.55 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (41%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
0.7 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
1.2 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14.8     avg: 15     median: 15.1 (39%)     max: 15.2 GB/s
7 GB/s (18%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 287     avg: 308.2     median: 311 (4%)     max: 331 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 182     avg: 191.7     median: 192 (1%)     max: 202 Seconds
min: 395.5     avg: 456.2     median: 469.3 (3%)     max: 485.9 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4159     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4467 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14891     avg: 15630     median: 15689 (33%)     max: 16149 Points
min: 7531     avg: 10078     median: 10294.5 (22%)     max: 10832 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.058     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.442 s
min: 8.98     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (2%)     max: 9.45 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.513     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (1%)     max: 18.402 s
min: 20.26     avg: 21     median: 21.1 (1%)     max: 21.39 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 529.929     avg: 572     median: 532.8 (2%)     max: 653.976 s
min: 509     avg: 524     median: 524 (2%)     max: 537 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74246     avg: 81139     median: 81099.5 (62%)     max: 86583 Points
min: 27882     avg: 36281     median: 37117 (29%)     max: 41516 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 16799     avg: 22356     median: 22390.5 (55%)     max: 25006 Points
min: 7869     avg: 11044     median: 11474.5 (28%)     max: 13112 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79935     avg: 88924     median: 89772 (73%)     max: 96559 Points
min: 43026     avg: 55905     median: 56773 (46%)     max: 58897 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 79450     avg: 88753     median: 89602 (73%)     max: 96418 Points
min: 51146     avg: 56438     median: 56720 (46%)     max: 58704 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 85305     avg: 91061     median: 91304.5 (73%)     max: 96047 Points
min: 55371     avg: 57714     median: 57465.5 (46%)     max: 60233 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13400     avg: 19825     median: 20578 (52%)     max: 21353 Points
min: 4876     avg: 9924     median: 10149 (26%)     max: 11320 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24034     avg: 28122     median: 28061 (50%)     max: 30876 Points
min: 8551     avg: 15199     median: 15533 (28%)     max: 17219 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10388     avg: 11192     median: 11196 (47%)     max: 12212 Points
min: 2859     avg: 5724     median: 5858 (25%)     max: 7037 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2408     avg: 2615     median: 2661.5 (64%)     max: 2746 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 9798     avg: 12181     median: 12348 (48%)     max: 13470 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2413     avg: 2555     median: 2592.5 (82%)     max: 2646 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 9436     avg: 12089     median: 12403 (51%)     max: 13086 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1823     avg: 1983     median: 1989.5 (76%)     max: 2032 Points
1050 Points (40%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11207     avg: 11931     median: 12145 (22%)     max: 12500 Points
4820 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1764     avg: 1880     median: 1905 (8%)     max: 1918 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11232     avg: 11682     median: 11526 (36%)     max: 12141 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7410     avg: 7923     median: 8014.5 (80%)     max: 8253 Points
min: 4669     avg: 4982     median: 5040 (50%)     max: 5146 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 45905     avg: 47560     median: 47496.5 (47%)     max: 49341 Points
min: 17709     avg: 21069     median: 21648 (21%)     max: 23313 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4548     avg: 4839     median: 4868.5 (54%)     max: 4997 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17048     avg: 19665     median: 19875 (26%)     max: 22006 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 20725     avg: 21871     median: 21920 (39%)     max: 22665 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3734     avg: 3995     median: 4008 (52%)     max: 4163 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 481     avg: 498.9     median: 503 (1%)     max: 515 ms
min: 695     avg: 1108     median: 1124 (1%)     max: 1272 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 77.5     avg: 82.3     median: 83 (1%)     max: 85.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
89067 Points (65%)
min: 27460     avg: 34108     median: 34163 (25%)     max: 44549 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 234     avg: 262.5     median: 264 (73%)     max: 274 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 302     avg: 322.4     median: 318 (57%)     max: 349 Points
213 Points (38%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1674     avg: 1785     median: 1792 (67%)     max: 1861 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70     avg: 99.2     median: 94 (16%)     max: 130.1 Watt
min: 0     avg: 67.1     median: 90.4 (16%)     max: 111 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 73     avg: 101.1     median: 104.7 (19%)     max: 134 Watt
min: 97     avg: 109.5     median: 109.5 (20%)     max: 122 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.76     avg: 11.9     median: 10.7 (7%)     max: 20.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 9.82     avg: 15.9     median: 15.6 (19%)     max: 21.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 21.9     avg: 28     median: 27.4 (20%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt
min: 8.19     avg: 21     median: 12.6 (9%)     max: 42.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8750H → 57% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 04. 03:33:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14946 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9576 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759541592s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 02 Oct 2025 12:30:24 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14946 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14946 +0.023s ... 0.032s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9576 +0.005s ... 0.037s

#10 got single benchmarks 9576 +0.098s ... 0.135s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.135s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.078s ... 0.212s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.214s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)