Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-7700HQ vs Intel Celeron N3350

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7700HQ

The Intel Core i7-7700HQ is a fast quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake H architecture (7th generation Core), which was announced in January 2017 at CES. It is the successor to the Core i7-6700HQ from the Skylake generation and is manufactured in an improved 14 nm+ process, so the clocks are 200 MHz higher at the same TDP. The architecture was not changed, only the video engine got an update (see our Kaby Lake article).

The integrated graphics card is called Intel HD Graphics 630, but the architecture does not differ from the 530 GPU from the Skylake generation and only the clocks are slightly higher. 

Performance

Thanks to the 200 MHz higher clocks (5.5-7.6% depending on the Boost), the CPU performance is increased and roughly on par with the Core i7-6970HQ (2.8-3.7 GHz but with 128 MB eDRAM). The TDP can also be reduced to 35 Watts (cTDP down), but this will reduce the performance.

Power Consumption

Due to its 45-Watt TDP, the CPU will be used in bigger notebooks with at least 15 inches most of the time.

Intel Celeron N3350

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3350 is an Apollo Lake family, dual-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its two cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.4 GHz; these are not Hyper-Threading-enabled meaning there are no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 500, and eats very little (~6 W).

Amusingly enough, Intel keeps making and selling the Celeron as of late 2022, albeit the price has dropped from about $100 to about $20 per unit making the CPU even more popular with ultra-budget nettop and laptop makers.

Architecture & Features

Just like other Celeron N, Celeron J, Pentium N, Pentium J processors, this Celeron is notable for its small die size. It is easy to manufacture, lowering the costs and enabling Intel to compete with various ARM-based products (hello, Raspberry Pi).

The Celeron N3350 features the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture. This replaces the dated Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements and making for a double-digit IPC improvement. There is still no L3 cache to be found here, however, it now takes less cycles to perform many operations.

The Celeron is compatible with DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 RAM. Intel's guidelines state that up to 8 GB are supported; that being said, various forum users report that the CPU functions just fine if mated to 16 GB and even 32 GB of RAM. The chip features six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes for connecting various devices, meaning a four-lane NVMe SSD will not be able to deliver a data transfer rate of more than 2 GB/s. eMMC and SATA storage is supported natively, too.

This Intel CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. However, Microsoft only allows Windows 11 to be installed on systems with CPUs released in 2017 or later, making 64-bit Windows 10 the only OS that the Celeron is officially compatible with.

Last but not the least, please keep in mind that this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1296 socket interface).

Performance

The average N3350 in our database is just as fast as the Atom x5-Z8300 and the Core 2 Duo SU7300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is not fast at all. In fact, the two cores of this Celeron trail behind a single core of any half-decent CPU such as Intel's very own Core i3-7130U. A proper x86 CPU, Celeron N3350 will let you run nearly any Windows app, the caveat being that you will have to wait for several seconds every time you click on something. Windows 10 takes nearly a minute to fully boot with this CPU.

Graphics

The Intel HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is the highlight of this little Celeron. As far as the feature set is concerned, the HD Graphics 500 is not much different from the HD Graphics 520 or any other graphics adapter that full-blown six-generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 chips have. This iGPU is compatible with DX12; it will drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 2160p60. It will happily decode VP9 and AVC-encoded videos, too. These are the two codecs that YouTube mostly relies on, as of 2021.

It's not all roses and sunshine. To keep power consumption under control, the number of Execution Units was reduced to 12 (the HD Graphics 520 has 24 EUs at its disposal, for reference). Besides, the UHD Graphics runs at up to 650 MHz which is not a lot. Very few games will be playable on this graphics solution - mostly, ones that were released in the 2000s or even in the 1990s.

Power consumption

The Celeron's default TDP (also known as the Power Limit 1) is 6 W, making it a great option for passively cooled systems. Increasing the PL1 by one or two watts, which many systems built around Apollo Lake allow one to do, makes for a much more responsive user experience, speaking subjectively.

Energy efficiency isn't great here, as Intel's 14 nm processes are very old as of mid 2022.

ModelIntel Core i7-7700HQIntel Celeron N3350
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeIntel Celeron
CodenameKaby LakeApollo Lake
Series: Celeron Apollo Lake
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ « 2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron J3455 compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 compare1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2800 - 3800 MHz1100 - 2400 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 2
TDP45 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGABGA1296
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI saveDDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$378 U.S.$24 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-7700HQ
28.2 pt (39%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N3350
11.6 pt (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
328 Points (0%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
252 Points (11%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 358     avg: 370     median: 370 (41%)     max: 382 Points
min: 100     avg: 103.5     median: 103.5 (12%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1765     avg: 1774     median: 1774 (4%)     max: 1783 Points
min: 151     avg: 170.5     median: 170.5 (0%)     max: 190 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 603     avg: 727     median: 734 (5%)     max: 747 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 120     avg: 155.4     median: 159 (48%)     max: 162 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 6.67     avg: 8     median: 8.1 (11%)     max: 8.23 Points
min: 1.07     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.12 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.36     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (45%)     max: 1.84 Points
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (15%)     max: 0.6 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5426     avg: 5882     median: 5910 (36%)     max: 7214 Points
min: 1458     avg: 1570     median: 1490 (9%)     max: 1917 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 19409     avg: 22384     median: 22152 (16%)     max: 29209 Points
min: 1775     avg: 2505     median: 2654 (2%)     max: 2787 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 28341     avg: 28770     median: 28724.5 (20%)     max: 29210 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 7347     avg: 7559     median: 7584 (9%)     max: 7795 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 210.4     avg: 257.2     median: 225.7 (3%)     max: 379 s
min: 1225     avg: 1300     median: 1258 (15%)     max: 1418 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.932     avg: 8.7     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 20.1 s
min: 42.2     avg: 46.1     median: 45.5 (9%)     max: 50.6 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
212.2 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.6 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3763     avg: 4418     median: 4541.5 (7%)     max: 4903 Points
616 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 18417     avg: 20916     median: 19916 (11%)     max: 25414 MIPS
min: 2692     avg: 2980     median: 2979.5 (2%)     max: 3267 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3986     avg: 4405     median: 4088 (49%)     max: 5457 MIPS
min: 1653     avg: 1724     median: 1723.5 (21%)     max: 1794 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 36.55     avg: 44.6     median: 46 (16%)     max: 46.45 fps
6.2 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 156.9     avg: 168.1     median: 168.4 (39%)     max: 175 fps
32.5 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.97     avg: 6.2     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.39 fps
min: 0.63     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.65 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.361     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.6 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.529     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.724 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 2.4     avg: 4     median: 4.1 (11%)     max: 4.2 GB/s
0.7 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 597     avg: 631     median: 631 (4%)     max: 665 Seconds
min: 6275     avg: 6276     median: 6276 (44%)     max: 6277 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.7217     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.7605 sec
min: 2.21     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (50%)     max: 2.433 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 6876     avg: 7596     median: 7686 (16%)     max: 7839 Points
min: 1624     avg: 1655     median: 1654.5 (4%)     max: 1685 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 9     avg: 10.3     median: 10 (2%)     max: 14.8 s
min: 27.5     avg: 29.2     median: 27.5 (6%)     max: 32.5 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 22     avg: 23.3     median: 22.7 (1%)     max: 33.4 s
min: 61.2     avg: 64.5     median: 61.2 (3%)     max: 71.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 511     avg: 565     median: 551 (2%)     max: 921 s
min: 1515     avg: 1532     median: 1538 (7%)     max: 1543 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 22514     avg: 25520     median: 26567 (23%)     max: 26880 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6007     avg: 8386     median: 8833 (24%)     max: 9653 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 13754     avg: 46073     median: 47945 (39%)     max: 52765 Points
min: 11556     avg: 12344     median: 12344 (10%)     max: 13132 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 33185     avg: 46275     median: 47639 (39%)     max: 52753 Points
min: 11665     avg: 12042     median: 12041.5 (10%)     max: 12418 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 42156     avg: 50621     median: 50806 (43%)     max: 53642 Points
min: 10653     avg: 12775     median: 13161.5 (11%)     max: 14698 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4328     avg: 7329     median: 7518.5 (19%)     max: 7867 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6143     avg: 10428     median: 10617.5 (19%)     max: 10953 Points
min: 1293     avg: 1412     median: 1412 (3%)     max: 1501 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2863     avg: 3938     median: 3951 (17%)     max: 4383 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1004 Points (42%)
min: 310     avg: 320     median: 320 (14%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3742 Points (7%)
min: 591     avg: 606     median: 605.5 (1%)     max: 620 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1030 Points (4%)
309 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3924 Points (12%)
587 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4415     avg: 4638     median: 4635 (46%)     max: 4808 Points
min: 1374     avg: 1473     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1529 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13053     avg: 14679     median: 14783 (16%)     max: 15111 Points
min: 2427     avg: 2599     median: 2619.5 (3%)     max: 2731 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4119     avg: 4477     median: 4452.5 (61%)     max: 4740 Points
min: 1464     avg: 1491     median: 1500 (20%)     max: 1510 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12384     avg: 13663     median: 14009.5 (34%)     max: 14596 Points
min: 2529     avg: 2589     median: 2589 (6%)     max: 2648 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13290     avg: 13780     median: 13936.5 (25%)     max: 14275 Points
min: 2409     avg: 2468     median: 2467.5 (4%)     max: 2526 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3256     avg: 3641     median: 3675 (72%)     max: 3843 Points
min: 1314     avg: 1328     median: 1327.5 (26%)     max: 1341 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13753     avg: 14103     median: 14102.5 (22%)     max: 14452 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3532     avg: 3715     median: 3715 (56%)     max: 3898 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
7620 Points (61%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
7210 Points (65%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12792 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
13091 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
11263 Points (29%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
10003 Points (52%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 919     avg: 982     median: 965 (1%)     max: 1244 ms
min: 3108     avg: 3519     median: 3443 (4%)     max: 4230 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 67.2     avg: 75.1     median: 72.4 (1%)     max: 108.5 ms
min: 255     avg: 370.3     median: 299.2 (3%)     max: 628 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 30332     avg: 38344     median: 38801 (35%)     max: 41638 Points
min: 8457     avg: 9831     median: 9492.5 (9%)     max: 11461 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
152 Points (32%)
min: 49.2     avg: 55.4     median: 52.2 (11%)     max: 68 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3574 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
7138 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5377 Points (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
7007 Points (35%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70     avg: 76.1     median: 72.5 (12%)     max: 94 Watt
8.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 60     avg: 64.2     median: 63.5 (12%)     max: 70 Watt
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 10.6     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (8%)     max: 11.9 Points per Watt
12.5 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7700HQ → 100% n=45

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3350 → 35% n=45

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 02:31:20

#0 checking url part for id 8400 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8185 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:39:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.074s ... 0.076s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.076s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8400 +0.021s ... 0.097s

#7 got single benchmarks 8400 +0.585s ... 0.683s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8185 +0.016s ... 0.699s

#9 got single benchmarks 8185 +0.096s ... 0.795s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.795s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.513s ... 1.308s

#12 return log +0.03s ... 1.338s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)