Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-7700HQ vs Intel Pentium Silver N5030 vs Intel Celeron N4020

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7700HQ

The Intel Core i7-7700HQ is a fast quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake H architecture (7th generation Core), which was announced in January 2017 at CES. It is the successor to the Core i7-6700HQ from the Skylake generation and is manufactured in an improved 14 nm+ process, so the clocks are 200 MHz higher at the same TDP. The architecture was not changed, only the video engine got an update (see our Kaby Lake article).

The integrated graphics card is called Intel HD Graphics 630, but the architecture does not differ from the 530 GPU from the Skylake generation and only the clocks are slightly higher. 

Performance

Thanks to the 200 MHz higher clocks (5.5-7.6% depending on the Boost), the CPU performance is increased and roughly on par with the Core i7-6970HQ (2.8-3.7 GHz but with 128 MB eDRAM). The TDP can also be reduced to 35 Watts (cTDP down), but this will reduce the performance.

Power Consumption

Due to its 45-Watt TDP, the CPU will be used in bigger notebooks with at least 15 inches most of the time.

Intel Pentium Silver N5030

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N5030

The Intel Pentium Silver N5030 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2019. It runs at 1.1-3.1 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. The 5030 is the refresh of the older Pentium 5000 and offers a 400 MHz higher Boost clock. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a better GPU architecture and a partly integrated WiFi support. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture is still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N5030 in our database proves unable to beat the AMD 3020e, an entry-level dual-core CPU of similar power efficiency, in multi-thread performance, rendering the Pentium a poor option for anything but the most basic day-to-day activities, as of late 2022.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 18 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 5300 and HD Graphics 505 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Pentium has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 6 W. This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs and handhelds.

The Intel Pentium N5030 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes making for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N4020

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4020

The Intel Celeron N4020 is a slow dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in laptops and mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.8 GHz, the latter being a moderate 200 MHz upgrade over the preceding N4000 chip. Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and an integrated UHD 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, the N4020 is manufactured on a really old, as of late 2023, 14 nm process. What makes the newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, a reduction in physical size.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is not much different from what was used in Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A relatively large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of N4020's strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to processors of previous generations. Still, Gemini Lake refresh processors are a clear step down from Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

The N4020 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few N4020-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s, though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight to the motherboard for good (BGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

While slightly faster than the outgoing Celeron N4000, the average N4020 in our extensive database only just manages to match the N6211, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. These three chips deliver multi-thread CB R15, CB R20 and CB R23 scores that are so low, they lag behind a single-thread score of any half-decent CPU such as an i5-1135G7. In other words, these Celeron N chips are good enough for basic tasks only such as word processing and Web browsing with two or three tabs open at a time.

The Celeron N4120, a quad-core chip with a similar name, has little trouble leaving the N4020 behind in most workloads - which is not to say it is a fast CPU.

Jacking the long-term power limit value up to something like 9 W will help improve system responsiveness noticeably.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like the  HD Graphics 520 or the UHD Graphics 615 or other widespread Intel iGPUs found in Core i3/i5/i7/i9 processors of generations six to ten.

Just like the HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 is DX12 compatible. The iGPU's 12 EUs can run at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about as far as its talents go.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution can drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9-encoded videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a limit on video resolutions that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power consumption

The low 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) makes it easy for laptop makers to ditch the fan. Performance sustainability will be poor unless the long-term Power Limit is set to a value higher than the default 6 W and a fan is available to aid in heat dissipation.

The Celeron N4020 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-7700HQIntel Pentium Silver N5030Intel Celeron N4020
CodenameKaby LakeGemini Lake RefreshGemini Lake refresh
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake refresh
Intel Core i7-7700K4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-77003.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v63.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v63 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ « 2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-75003.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y751.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y571.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y541.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y321 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y301 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver J50402 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 « 1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41252 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N40201.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J50402 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50301.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41252 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2800 - 3800 MHz1100 - 3100 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 42 / 2
TDP45 Watt6 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGABGA1090BGA1090
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI saveDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 605 (200 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$378 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
TDP Turbo PL215 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-7700HQ
26.5 pt (44%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N5030
16.9 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4020
15.6 pt (26%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
911 Points (1%)
616 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
430 Points (18%)
308 Points (13%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 358     avg: 370     median: 370 (40%)     max: 382 Points
min: 171     avg: 182.5     median: 182.5 (20%)     max: 194 Points
min: 149.8     avg: 162.4     median: 162.4 (18%)     max: 175 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1765     avg: 1774     median: 1774 (4%)     max: 1783 Points
min: 360     avg: 425.5     median: 425.5 (1%)     max: 491 Points
min: 242     avg: 279     median: 279 (1%)     max: 316 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 603     avg: 727     median: 734 (5%)     max: 747 Points
min: 203     avg: 226     median: 226 (1%)     max: 248.9 Points
min: 110.1     avg: 127.1     median: 127.1 (1%)     max: 144.1 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 120     avg: 155.4     median: 159 (44%)     max: 162 Points
min: 75.8     avg: 80.9     median: 80.9 (22%)     max: 86 Points
min: 68.6     avg: 73.8     median: 73.8 (20%)     max: 78.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 6.67     avg: 8     median: 8.1 (11%)     max: 8.23 Points
3.1 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.36     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (43%)     max: 1.84 Points
1 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5426     avg: 5882     median: 5910 (36%)     max: 7214 Points
2498 Points (15%)
2184 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 19409     avg: 22384     median: 22152 (16%)     max: 29209 Points
7724 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 28341     avg: 28770     median: 28724.5 (18%)     max: 29210 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 7347     avg: 7559     median: 7584 (9%)     max: 7795 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 210.4     avg: 257.2     median: 225.7 (3%)     max: 379 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.932     avg: 8.7     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 20.1 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
212.2 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.6 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3763     avg: 4418     median: 4541.5 (7%)     max: 4903 Points
1163 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 18417     avg: 20916     median: 19916 (11%)     max: 25414 MIPS
min: 6598     avg: 7238     median: 7238 (4%)     max: 7878 MIPS
4498 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3986     avg: 4405     median: 4088 (48%)     max: 5457 MIPS
min: 2555     avg: 2645     median: 2645 (31%)     max: 2735 MIPS
2456 MIPS (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 36.55     avg: 44.6     median: 46 (1%)     max: 46.45 fps
17.6 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 156.9     avg: 168.1     median: 168.4 (4%)     max: 175 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.97     avg: 6.2     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.39 fps
0.7 fps (1%)
min: 0.73     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.92 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.361     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (12%)     max: 0.6 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.529     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.724 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 2.4     avg: 4     median: 4.1 (11%)     max: 4.2 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 597     avg: 631     median: 631 (4%)     max: 665 Seconds
min: 3319     avg: 3450     median: 3449.5 (24%)     max: 3580 Seconds
4064 Seconds (29%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.7217     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.7605 sec
min: 1.402     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (31%)     max: 1.473 sec
1.5 sec (33%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 6876     avg: 7596     median: 7686 (16%)     max: 7839 Points
3895 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 9     avg: 10.3     median: 10 (2%)     max: 14.8 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 22     avg: 23.3     median: 22.7 (1%)     max: 33.4 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 511     avg: 565     median: 551 (2%)     max: 921 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 22514     avg: 25520     median: 26567 (20%)     max: 26880 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6007     avg: 8386     median: 8833 (22%)     max: 9653 Points
min: 2326     avg: 2377     median: 2377 (6%)     max: 2428 Points
min: 1560     avg: 1650     median: 1650 (4%)     max: 1740 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 13754     avg: 46073     median: 47945 (39%)     max: 52765 Points
23701 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 33185     avg: 46275     median: 47639 (39%)     max: 52753 Points
23621 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 42156     avg: 50621     median: 50806 (41%)     max: 53642 Points
min: 26682     avg: 31360     median: 31360 (25%)     max: 36038 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4328     avg: 7329     median: 7518.5 (19%)     max: 7867 Points
min: 2155     avg: 2183     median: 2182.5 (6%)     max: 2210 Points
1286 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6143     avg: 10428     median: 10617.5 (19%)     max: 10953 Points
min: 3014     avg: 3209     median: 3209 (6%)     max: 3404 Points
min: 1852     avg: 1853     median: 1853 (3%)     max: 1854 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2863     avg: 3938     median: 3951 (17%)     max: 4383 Points
704 Points (3%)
476 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
2857 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
3123 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
421 Points (10%)
400 Points (10%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
1111 Points (4%)
706 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1004 Points (38%)
min: 431     avg: 491.7     median: 512 (19%)     max: 532 Points
min: 319     avg: 418.7     median: 462 (18%)     max: 475 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
3742 Points (7%)
min: 1039     avg: 1263     median: 1221 (2%)     max: 1529 Points
min: 663     avg: 786     median: 836 (1%)     max: 858 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1030 Points (4%)
356 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3924 Points (12%)
1177 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4415     avg: 4638     median: 4635 (46%)     max: 4808 Points
2176 Points (22%)
min: 1989     avg: 2004     median: 2004 (20%)     max: 2019 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13053     avg: 14679     median: 14783 (14%)     max: 15111 Points
5662 Points (6%)
min: 3404     avg: 3433     median: 3433 (3%)     max: 3462 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4119     avg: 4477     median: 4452.5 (49%)     max: 4740 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12384     avg: 13663     median: 14009.5 (18%)     max: 14596 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13290     avg: 13780     median: 13936.5 (25%)     max: 14275 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3256     avg: 3641     median: 3675 (48%)     max: 3843 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13753     avg: 14103     median: 14102.5 (22%)     max: 14452 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3532     avg: 3715     median: 3715 (56%)     max: 3898 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
7620 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
7210 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12792 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
13091 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
11263 Points (29%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
10003 Points (52%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 919     avg: 982     median: 965 (1%)     max: 1244 ms
min: 1914     avg: 2410     median: 2170 (3%)     max: 3145 ms
min: 2300     avg: 2488     median: 2488 (3%)     max: 2676 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 67.2     avg: 75.1     median: 72.4 (1%)     max: 108.5 ms
355.8 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 30332     avg: 38344     median: 38801 (28%)     max: 41638 Points
min: 21894     avg: 21899     median: 21899 (16%)     max: 21904 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 49.4     avg: 55.3     median: 55.3 (15%)     max: 61.1 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
152 Points (27%)
min: 91.3     avg: 100.9     median: 95.4 (17%)     max: 116 Points
min: 76.2     avg: 80.2     median: 80.2 (14%)     max: 84.2 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
8984 Points (47%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
31170 Points (67%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9447 Points (62%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
13200 Points (66%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
310 Points (12%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70     avg: 76.1     median: 72.5 (12%)     max: 94 Watt
min: 9.09     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (2%)     max: 10.5 Watt
12.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 60     avg: 64.2     median: 63.5 (12%)     max: 70 Watt
min: 7.98     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 9.6 Watt
10.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.6 Watt (6%)
6.9 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 10.6     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (8%)     max: 11.9 Points per Watt
min: 25.4     avg: 25.7     median: 25.7 (19%)     max: 25.9 Points per Watt
14.3 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7700HQ → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N5030 → 40% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4020 → 31% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 17. 06:56:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8400 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11531 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11535 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760676969s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 Oct 2025 05:21:56 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8400 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 8400 +0.117s ... 0.133s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11531 +0.004s ... 0.137s

#11 got single benchmarks 11531 +0.007s ... 0.144s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11535 +0.003s ... 0.147s

#13 got single benchmarks 11535 +0.014s ... 0.161s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.161s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.1s ... 0.262s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.262s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)