Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics 615

Intel UHD Graphics 615

The Intel UHD Graphics 615 (GT2) is a low-end integrated graphics unit, which can be found in the Y-series of the Amber-Lake generation. This "GT2" version offers 24 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at up to 1000 MHz (depending on the CPU model). Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the UHD 615 has to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L/LPDDR3). Compared to the old HD Graphics 615 in Kaby-Lake-Y CPUs, the UHD 615 is the same GPU with slightly different clock speeds (depending on the model) and slight power/performance improvements due to the improved 14nm++ process .

Performance

The 3D performance of the UHD 615 depends on the CPU model and the cooling / TDP-setting of the laptop. Furthermore, the used main memory (single channel, DDR3(L), amount) is influencing performance. On average the UHD graphics 615 should be very similar to the Kaby-Lake HD Graphics 615 due to the same architecture and similar speeds. That means that only low demanding games like Farming Simulator 17 or Rocket League are playable in lowest detail settings.

Features

The revised video engine in the HD 615 and UHD 615 now supports H.265/HEVC Main10 profile in hardware with 10 bit colors. Furthermore, Googles VP9 codec can also be hardware decoded. The UHD 615 should support HDCP 2.2 and therefore Netflix 4K. HDMI 2.0 however is still only supported with an external converter chip (LSPCon).

Power Consumption

The UHD Graphics 615 can be found in Y processors with 5 W TDP (can be manipulated by the laptop manufacturers, and up 0,5 Watt from the previous generation) and is therefore suited for very thin, mostly passively cooled 2-in-1 notebooks and tablets.

Gen. 9.5 Series

Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameKaby-Lake GT2
ArchitectureGen. 9 Amber Lake
Pipelines24 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1000 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3L/LPDDR3
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
Power Consumption5 Watt
technology14 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement30.08.2018
CPU in UHD Graphics 615GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i5-10310Y4 x 1100 MHz, 7 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i5-10210Y4 x 1000 MHz, 7 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i7-8500Y2 x 1500 MHz, 5 W300 MHz1000 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz850 - 1050 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.4 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 50702     avg: 60159     median: 57024 (6%)     max: 73265 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 3490     avg: 4533     median: 4423 (5%)     max: 5622 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 4521     avg: 6316     median: 6583 (2%)     max: 7568 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 509     avg: 730     median: 738 (1%)     max: 881 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 563     avg: 816     median: 819 (1%)     max: 976 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 34728     avg: 42945     median: 42909 (5%)     max: 53693 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 893     avg: 1271     median: 1312.5 (2%)     max: 1504 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 821     avg: 1175     median: 1221 (1%)     max: 1378 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 22.54     avg: 32.9     median: 35.2 (2%)     max: 44.49 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
17.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
7.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
2.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
9.7 15.1 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
19.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
42.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
11.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
95.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
7.8 8.1 10 10.2 19.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.3 6.5 7.2 8.2 12.5 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6 6.1 7.7 11.3 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
51.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
33.2 49.1 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
21.9
27.8
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
14.1 16.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.9 8.6 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
16.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
29.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
29.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
10.5 10.6 15.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.3 9.9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
31.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1366x768
53  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
40.8 49.5 52 52.6 55.3 56.6 57.2 60.1 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.4 17.7 25.9 25.9 26.3 27.3 29.3 32.1 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.5 11.3 12.1 12.9 13.4 13.6 15.2 15.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.6 10.3 11.3 11.6 11.8 12.3 13.7 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
9.3 9.5 12.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
16.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
27.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
16.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
97.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
25.3 31.3 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.4 21.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.1 16.4 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
27.5 31.1 38.3 38.8 39.2 41.6 49.1 50.2 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.8 18.1 19.8 22.4 23.6 25 26.5 28.6 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.3 15.8 17.5 18.1 18.2 20.3 22.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 4.4 5.7 6.1 7 7.6 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
51.2 59.9 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.7 31.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.9 21.2 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
100.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
54.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
41.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
58  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
39.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
144.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
36.3  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
23.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GRID 201917.76.9
Borderlands 37.33.1
Control7.62.4
F1 201912
Total War: Three Kingdoms15.2
Anno 1800125.22
The Division 25
Dirt Rally 2.019.2
Far Cry New Dawn7
Metro Exodus6.23.5
Apex Legends8.8
Just Cause 410.5
Darksiders III15.75
Battlefield V5.8
Farming Simulator 1942.115.8
Hitman 27.6
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey7
Forza Horizon 413
Shadow of the Tomb Raider10
F1 20181912
Monster Hunter World11.5
Far Cry 56
World of Tanks enCore95.111.8
X-Plane 11.111188
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark6.13.3
Fortnite15.98
ELEX9.2
Middle-earth: Shadow of War167
Team Fortress 251.845.629
Rocket League411610.3
Prey158
Ghost Recon Wildlands8.1
For Honor16.4
Civilization VI29.5
Overwatch29.921.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider1285.3
Rainbow Six Siege31.319.5
World of Warships5334.6
Dota 2 Reborn53251311
The Witcher 3105.9
GTA V16.416.9
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor27.816.7
GRID: Autosport97.434.424.7
Battlefield 4282014
BioShock Infinite3922185
Tomb Raider5629197.9
Counter-Strike: GO100.261.436
Diablo III54.737.533.919.4
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim41.723.3
Deus Ex Human Revolution5839.616
StarCraft 2144.136.323.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
36
11
3
1
26
5
1
10
3

5








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 02:13:47

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.05s ... 0.051s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.051s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8832 +0.032s ... 0.083s

#7 got single benchmarks 8832 +0.057s ... 0.14s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.14s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.745s ... 0.886s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.886s

#11 Got 180 rows for game benchmarks. +0.02s ... 0.906s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.906s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.036s ... 0.942s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.109s ... 2.051s

#15 return log +0.044s ... 2.096s

Notebook reviews with Intel UHD Graphics 615 graphics card

Microsoft Surface Go 3 in review - The compact convertible now with Windows 11

Microsoft Surface Go 3 in review - The compact convertible now with Windows 11

The developers at Microsoft apparently had their hands full with the new Surface Pro 8 and Studio, because the compact Surface Go 3 only gets a mini update with...
Intel Core i3-10100Y | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | 10.50" | 783 g
Microsoft Surface Go 2 Review: Compact Convertible gets a bigger screen

Microsoft Surface Go 2 Review: Compact Convertible gets a bigger screen

Microsoft equips its compact convertible with a slightly larger screen and more pixels, but keeps the regular x86 processor compared to the Surface Pro X. But i...
Intel Core m3-8100Y | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | 10.50" | 790 g
Chuwi AeroBook Pro Laptop Review: Core m3 is Showing its Age

Chuwi AeroBook Pro Laptop Review: Core m3 is Showing its Age

The AeroBook Pro is the 2020 refresh designed to replace the 2019 AeroBook. Despite what the name may suggest, however, both performance and the chassis remain ...
Intel Core m3-8100Y | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | 13.30" | 1.3 kg
Asus Chromebook Flip C434TA in review: Silent convertible offers good endurance

Asus Chromebook Flip C434TA in review: Silent convertible offers good endurance

The Asus Chromebook Flip features a Core m3-8100Y processor, an IPS touchscreen display and good battery life. The integration of the Google Play Store allows t...
Intel Core m3-8100Y | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
Chuwi UBook Pro Tablet Review: The Microsoft Surface Pro Clone

Chuwi UBook Pro Tablet Review: The Microsoft Surface Pro Clone

The UBook Pro offers high-end looks with low-end performance for a mid-range price. If you can get past the slow Core m3 processor, then you'll find the super-b...
Intel Core m3-8100Y | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | 12.30" | 780 g

Porsche Design Ultra One: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  Review » Porsche Design Ultra One laptop short review: Noisy SSD antagonizes the expensive laptop

Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 14.00", 0.9 kg
  Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T Review: Slim and light subnotebook for a fat wallet

HP ProBook x360 11 G4: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  Review » HP ProBook x360 11 G4 EE laptop review: Robust convertible for schools

VAIO A12-92993: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 12.50", 1.1 kg
  Review » VAIO A12 (Core i7-8500Y, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD, FHD) Convertible Review

HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  Review » HP Spectre Folio 13 (i5-8500Y) Convertible Review

Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003: Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y, 10.00", 0.5 kg
  Review » Microsoft Surface Go (Pentium, 64GB eMMC) Tablet Review

Asus Chromebook Flip Z3400FT-H50130: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Flip Z3400FT-H50130

Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3: Intel Core i3-10100Y, 10.50", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3

Chuwi Minibook, m3-8100Y: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 8.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Chuwi Minibook, m3-8100Y

Asus Chromebook Flip C433TA-AS384T: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Flip C433TA-AS384T

One Netbook OneGx1: Intel Core i5-10210Y, 7.00", 0.6 kg
  External Review » One Netbook OneGx1

Xiaomi RedmiBook Air 13 i5-10210Y: Intel Core i5-10210Y, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Air 13 i5-10210Y

Asus Chromebook Flip Z3400FT-AJ0111: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Flip Z3400FT-AJ0111

Microsoft Surface Go 2 LTE: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 10.50", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Go 2 LTE

Asus Chromebook Flip C434TA-E10008: Intel Core i5-8200Y, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Flip C434TA-E10008

Chuwi AeroBook Pro: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Chuwi AeroBook Pro

Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 10.50", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y

Microsoft Surface Go 2 Pentium Gold 4425Y: Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y, 10.50", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Go 2 Pentium Gold 4425Y

Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-77LW: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 14.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-77LW

Chuwi UBook Pro: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 12.30", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Chuwi UBook Pro

Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-7537: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-7537

Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-741M: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 14.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-741M

Asus Chromebook Flip C433TA-AJ0005: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Flip C433TA-AJ0005

One Mix 3S Yoga: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 8.40", 0.7 kg
  External Review » One Mix 3S Yoga

Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 14.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR

Google Pixelbook Go i5: Intel Core i5-8200Y, 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Google Pixelbook Go i5

Asus Chromebook C425TA-DH384: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook C425TA-DH384

Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-75R6: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 14.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-75R6

Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-763C: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 14.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-763C

Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-51RC: Intel Core i5-8200Y, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-51RC

Asus Chromebook Flip C434TA-E10013: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Flip C434TA-E10013

Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-75G4: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 14.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-75G4

VAIO A12-92993: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 12.50", 1.1 kg
  External Review » VAIO A12-92993

HP Spectre Folio 13-AK0802no: Intel Core i5-8200Y, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre Folio 13-AK0802no

Asus Chromebook Flip C434TA-DSM4T: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Flip C434TA-DSM4T

HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0001na: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0001na

HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0950nd: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0950nd

Google Pixel Slate, Core m3: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 12.30", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Google Pixel Slate, Core m3

Google Pixel Slate, Core i5: Intel Core i5-8200Y, 12.30", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Google Pixel Slate, Core i5

Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T

HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0000ns: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0000ns

Asus Chromebook Flip C434TA: Intel Core i5-8200Y, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Flip C434TA

HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000

HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0001nf : Intel Core i7-8500Y, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0001nf

HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0020ng: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0020ng

HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0314ng: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0314ng

HP Chromebook x2 12-f002nf : Intel Core m3-7Y30, 12.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Chromebook x2 12-f002nf

HP Spectre Folio 13-AK0801no: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre Folio 13-AK0801no

HP Spectre Folio 13-AK0801en: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre Folio 13-AK0801en

Google Pixel Slate, i7: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 12.30", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Google Pixel Slate, i7

HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0015nr: Intel Core i7-8500Y, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0015nr

Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003: Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y, 10.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003

Microsoft Surface Go 2 Pentium Gold 4425Y: Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y, 10.50", 0.5 kg
  Article » Revisited: MS Surface Go 2 now going for as low as €266

Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 10.50", 0.8 kg
   » Microsofts Surface Go 2 is a compact convertible with LTE

Chuwi AeroBook Pro: Intel Core m3-8100Y, 13.30", 1.3 kg
   » Caught red-handed: Chuwi fakes laptop product images to look thinner and sexier than they really are

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter