Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Core i7-8750H vs Intel Core i7-9850H

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Core i7-8750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8750H

The Intel Core i7-8750H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and will be announced early 2018. The processor clocks at between 2.2 and 4.1 GHz (4 GHz with 4 cores, 3.9 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7820HQ (2.9 - 3.9 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i7-8850H is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i7-9850H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9850H

The Intel Core i7-9850H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.6 GHz (4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i7-8850H, the 9850H offers only improved clock rates.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. Compared to the i7-8850H, the performance improved only slightly.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Celeron N5095AIntel Core i7-8750HIntel Core i7-9850H
CodenameJasper LakeCoffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H « 2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H « 2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz2200 - 4100 MHz2600 - 4600 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB9 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
6 / 126 / 12
TDP15 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1338FCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
max. Temp.100 °C
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8750H
28.7 pt (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9850H
30.3 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 403     avg: 411.8     median: 412.5 (45%)     max: 418 Points
min: 425     avg: 439.5     median: 439.5 (48%)     max: 454 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2142     avg: 2377     median: 2336.5 (6%)     max: 2707 Points
min: 1800     avg: 2114     median: 2114 (5%)     max: 2428 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 863     avg: 1113     median: 1116 (7%)     max: 1251 Points
min: 1114     avg: 1205     median: 1230 (8%)     max: 1272 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 163     avg: 172     median: 173 (48%)     max: 177 Points
min: 192     avg: 193.8     median: 193 (53%)     max: 196.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.54     avg: 12.2     median: 12.3 (16%)     max: 13.54 Points
12.5 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.89     avg: 2     median: 2 (47%)     max: 2 Points
2.1 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6236     avg: 6479     median: 6471 (39%)     max: 6645 Points
7169 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 29664     avg: 33163     median: 33595 (24%)     max: 35307 Points
31938 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 33944     avg: 42290     median: 43494 (28%)     max: 46384 Points
42090 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 8472     avg: 8542     median: 8498 (10%)     max: 8665 Points
9224 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 125.5     avg: 157.5     median: 156.8 (2%)     max: 180.5 s
278 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.35     avg: 7.1     median: 5.5 (1%)     max: 16.26 s
8.3 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5310 Points (8%)
5621 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 28826     avg: 30674     median: 31144 (18%)     max: 33257 MIPS
min: 25786     avg: 29714     median: 31087 (18%)     max: 32268 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4599     avg: 4621     median: 4629 (55%)     max: 4630 MIPS
min: 5020     avg: 5066     median: 5086 (60%)     max: 5092 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 64.2     avg: 67.2     median: 67.2 (22%)     max: 70.2 fps
68.3 fps (23%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 193.5     avg: 200.3     median: 200.3 (46%)     max: 207.1 fps
201.3 fps (46%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.56     avg: 8.2     median: 7.8 (14%)     max: 9.55 fps
min: 7     avg: 8.4     median: 9 (16%)     max: 9.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.7 GB/s (21%)
0.8 GB/s (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (21%)
1.2 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7 GB/s (18%)
7.4 GB/s (19%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 395.5     avg: 456.2     median: 469.3 (3%)     max: 485.9 Seconds
min: 411     avg: 459.3     median: 415 (3%)     max: 552 Seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7531     avg: 10078     median: 10294.5 (22%)     max: 10832 Points
min: 9137     avg: 10056     median: 10056 (21%)     max: 10975 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.98     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (2%)     max: 9.45 s
8.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 20.26     avg: 21     median: 21.1 (1%)     max: 21.39 s
18.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 509     avg: 524     median: 524 (2%)     max: 537 s
467.6 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 27882     avg: 36281     median: 37117 (29%)     max: 41516 Points
min: 26292     avg: 34763     median: 37665 (29%)     max: 40333 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7869     avg: 11044     median: 11474.5 (28%)     max: 13112 Points
min: 9987     avg: 11361     median: 11512 (28%)     max: 12585 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 43026     avg: 55905     median: 56773 (46%)     max: 58897 Points
min: 54664     avg: 57802     median: 56870 (46%)     max: 61872 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 51146     avg: 56438     median: 56720 (46%)     max: 58704 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55371     avg: 57714     median: 57465.5 (46%)     max: 60233 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4876     avg: 9924     median: 10149 (26%)     max: 11320 Points
min: 8390     avg: 9853     median: 9841 (25%)     max: 11328 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8551     avg: 15199     median: 15533 (28%)     max: 17219 Points
min: 14059     avg: 15802     median: 15330 (27%)     max: 18016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2859     avg: 5724     median: 5858 (25%)     max: 7037 Points
min: 4588     avg: 5605     median: 5953 (25%)     max: 6275 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1050 Points (41%)
1150 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
4820 Points (9%)
5270 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1135     avg: 1169     median: 1169 (5%)     max: 1203 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5353     avg: 5620     median: 5619.5 (18%)     max: 5886 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4669     avg: 4982     median: 5040 (50%)     max: 5146 Points
min: 5320     avg: 5509     median: 5594 (56%)     max: 5614 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17709     avg: 21069     median: 21648 (22%)     max: 23313 Points
min: 18098     avg: 22010     median: 23715 (24%)     max: 24218 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4548     avg: 4839     median: 4868.5 (54%)     max: 4997 Points
5376 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17048     avg: 19665     median: 19875 (26%)     max: 22006 Points
20077 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 20725     avg: 21871     median: 21920 (39%)     max: 22665 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3734     avg: 3995     median: 4008 (52%)     max: 4163 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 695     avg: 1108     median: 1124 (1%)     max: 1272 ms
min: 1010     avg: 1018     median: 1015 (1%)     max: 1028 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 77.5     avg: 82.3     median: 83 (1%)     max: 85.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 27460     avg: 34108     median: 34163 (25%)     max: 44549 Points
min: 38630     avg: 39090     median: 39091 (29%)     max: 39548 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
213 Points (38%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 0     avg: 67.1     median: 90.4 (16%)     max: 111 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 97     avg: 109.5     median: 109.5 (20%)     max: 122 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 8.19     avg: 21     median: 12.6 (9%)     max: 42.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8750H → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9850H → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 10. 09:22:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9576 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11350 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754810539s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:18:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.008s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9576 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#11 got single benchmarks 9576 +0.104s ... 0.117s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11350 +0.004s ... 0.121s

#13 got single benchmarks 11350 +0.007s ... 0.128s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.128s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.184s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.184s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)