Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8565U vs Intel Core i5-10210U

Intel Core i7-8565U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8565U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation that was announced in August 2018 (IFA). Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i7-8550U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i7-8565U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 4,6 GHz (versus 4 GHz of the i7-8550U) for a single core and 4.1 GHz (versus 3.7 GHz) of all cores (4.1 GHz for 2 cores). The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Compared to the slower Core i5-8265U and i3-8145U, the i7 supports Thermal Velocity Boost.

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same microarchitecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8565U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additional Turbo  clock speed can be made use of. It looks like Intel is promoting the i7 to be 3 - 11% faster than the previous i7-8550U, with Cinebench R15 Multi reaching 5% gains.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory, it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i5-10210U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10210U

The Intel Core i5-10210U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i5-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (up to LPDDR4-2933 vs DDR4-2400) and two additional cores in the top model (not in this i5). The processor cores are clocked between 1.6 and 4.2 GHz (all 4 cores 3.9 GHz max). Thanks to Hyper-Threading 8 threads can be used. Compared to the faster i5-10510U, the level 3 cache was reduced from 8 to 6 MB. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The integrated graphics adapter however is still the same as in the previous generations. It's still called Intel UHD Graphics 620 and clocked from 300 - 1100 MHz in the i5. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder.

Performance

The average 10210U in our database is just as fast as the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, the Intel Core i7-8565U and the Intel Core i5-1035G1 are, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. While the i5 is not a performance monster, it sails through basic day-to-day workloads with little effort.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of 30 W, the Frost Canyon NUC (NUC10i5FNK) is among the fastest systems powered by the 10210U that we know of. It can be more than twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. By going for the lowest value, it is possible to build a passively cooled system around the i5. Please note that Comet Lake-U processors can briefly consume as much as 80 W or even 90 W when under heavy loads.

The Core i5-10210U is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for very low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-8565UIntel Core i5-10210U
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Comet Lake
CodenameWhiskey Lake-UComet Lake-U
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-U
Intel Core i7-8665U compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8565U « 1.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U compare1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U compare1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U compare1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U « 1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U compare2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1800 - 4600 MHz1600 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1528BGA1528
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NILPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8565U
29.6 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10210U
28.7 pt (40%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1794     avg: 3321     median: 3794 (4%)     max: 4376 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 797     avg: 974     median: 1062 (45%)     max: 1063 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 342     avg: 409.3     median: 411.5 (46%)     max: 472 Points
min: 322     avg: 406.8     median: 415 (46%)     max: 428 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 954     avg: 1257     median: 1181.5 (3%)     max: 1645 Points
min: 722     avg: 1279     median: 1242 (3%)     max: 1820 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 452     avg: 612     median: 608.5 (4%)     max: 815 Points
min: 320     avg: 609     median: 616 (4%)     max: 790 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 138.3     avg: 172.5     median: 173 (52%)     max: 193 Points
min: 134     avg: 165.6     median: 166 (50%)     max: 174 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.09     avg: 6.3     median: 6.8 (9%)     max: 7.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.65     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (48%)     max: 2.16 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2682     avg: 6571     median: 6644 (40%)     max: 8906 Points
min: 6410     avg: 6478     median: 6412 (39%)     max: 6613 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 13806     avg: 17608     median: 16760 (12%)     max: 23118 Points
min: 15037     avg: 17758     median: 16072 (12%)     max: 22164 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 14542     avg: 21376     median: 21661 (15%)     max: 26851 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5474     avg: 8104     median: 8809.5 (11%)     max: 9435 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 263.3     avg: 353.4     median: 360.2 (4%)     max: 420 s
217.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.812     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (2%)     max: 12.41 s
6.8 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
398 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
11.3 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3537     avg: 4129     median: 4291.5 (7%)     max: 4626 Points
4213 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 10531     avg: 17993     median: 18860 (11%)     max: 24847 MIPS
min: 10920     avg: 16808     median: 16742 (10%)     max: 21679 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2029     avg: 4558     median: 4737 (57%)     max: 5923 MIPS
min: 3504     avg: 4205     median: 4261 (51%)     max: 4467 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 29.35     avg: 33.8     median: 33.7 (12%)     max: 38.8 fps
min: 33.41     avg: 42.2     median: 43.9 (15%)     max: 49.35 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 127.5     avg: 144.4     median: 140.9 (33%)     max: 160.2 fps
min: 149.1     avg: 167.7     median: 169.5 (39%)     max: 184.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.24     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (8%)     max: 5.5 fps
min: 2.36     avg: 4.3     median: 4.3 (8%)     max: 6.28 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.347     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.516 GB/s
min: 0.48     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.491 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.567     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.869 GB/s
min: 0.79     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (14%)     max: 0.802 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.2     avg: 4.2     median: 4 (10%)     max: 5.1 GB/s
min: 4.6     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (12%)     max: 4.7 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 687     avg: 821     median: 806.5 (6%)     max: 1175 Seconds
min: 585     avg: 859     median: 829 (6%)     max: 1339 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.682     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.851 sec
min: 0.658     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.901 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2813     avg: 5806     median: 6158 (13%)     max: 7928 Points
min: 6167     avg: 6403     median: 6363 (14%)     max: 6680 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.286     avg: 8.5     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.889 s
min: 8.913     avg: 9     median: 9 (2%)     max: 9.008 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.9     avg: 19.3     median: 19 (1%)     max: 20.61 s
min: 20.35     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (1%)     max: 20.86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 491.1     avg: 520     median: 508 (2%)     max: 583 s
min: 509     avg: 517     median: 516.5 (2%)     max: 524 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 16249     avg: 20521     median: 20544 (18%)     max: 25525 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3083     avg: 6977     median: 6739 (18%)     max: 9422 Points
min: 3843     avg: 6632     median: 6720 (18%)     max: 9364 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 18314     avg: 43687     median: 46109 (37%)     max: 58024 Points
min: 40123     avg: 48009     median: 49630 (40%)     max: 54173 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 19795     avg: 41691     median: 40823 (33%)     max: 57796 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 22018     avg: 45134     median: 49602 (42%)     max: 60319 Points
min: 47281     avg: 55148     median: 56586 (48%)     max: 60555 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2413     avg: 5785     median: 5756 (15%)     max: 8032 Points
min: 4495     avg: 6154     median: 5973.5 (15%)     max: 8574 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3409     avg: 8376     median: 8361 (15%)     max: 11865 Points
min: 381     avg: 8610     median: 8567 (15%)     max: 11875 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1354     avg: 2953     median: 2841 (12%)     max: 3880 Points
min: 1983     avg: 2749     median: 2734.5 (12%)     max: 3997 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 6943     avg: 7132     median: 7131.5 (84%)     max: 7320 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
6885 Points (79%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1108     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (48%)     max: 1163 Points
min: 949     avg: 1071     median: 1079 (46%)     max: 1133 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2839     avg: 3074     median: 3073.5 (6%)     max: 3308 Points
min: 2079     avg: 3570     median: 3689 (7%)     max: 4256 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1103     avg: 1186     median: 1197 (5%)     max: 1229 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2643     avg: 3228     median: 3176 (10%)     max: 3803 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2357     avg: 5053     median: 5142.5 (51%)     max: 5547 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8142     avg: 14179     median: 13888 (15%)     max: 16968 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4701     avg: 4750     median: 4759 (65%)     max: 4791 Points
4892 Points (67%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11576     avg: 13367     median: 13617.5 (33%)     max: 14655 Points
15199 Points (37%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10521     avg: 12071     median: 12302.5 (22%)     max: 13703 Points
min: 11855     avg: 12114     median: 12114 (21%)     max: 12373 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3340     avg: 3882     median: 3851 (75%)     max: 4820 Points
min: 3429     avg: 3457     median: 3457 (68%)     max: 3485 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11720     avg: 12845     median: 12844.5 (20%)     max: 13969 Points
15805 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4276     avg: 4294     median: 4294 (64%)     max: 4312 Points
4278 Points (64%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 10320     avg: 10618     median: 10617.5 (86%)     max: 10915 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 7885     avg: 8316     median: 8315.5 (75%)     max: 8746 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 11135     avg: 11197     median: 11196.5 (22%)     max: 11258 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 10347     avg: 11305     median: 11305 (23%)     max: 12263 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 10402     avg: 10600     median: 10600 (28%)     max: 10798 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 730     avg: 1096     median: 1066 (1%)     max: 2622 ms
min: 886     avg: 1014     median: 966 (1%)     max: 1267 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 80.7     avg: 153.6     median: 152.7 (2%)     max: 228.3 ms
min: 239.4     avg: 245.5     median: 245.5 (3%)     max: 251.5 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 13935     avg: 34603     median: 34884.5 (31%)     max: 49795 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 176     avg: 208.4     median: 202 (42%)     max: 239 Points
min: 169     avg: 190.8     median: 191 (40%)     max: 203 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
4130 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 8069     avg: 8091     median: 8090.5 (43%)     max: 8112 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 26840     avg: 32009     median: 32009 (68%)     max: 37178 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 12155     avg: 12335     median: 12334.5 (81%)     max: 12514 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 17751     avg: 18155     median: 18155 (91%)     max: 18559 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17.1     avg: 30.6     median: 27.9 (5%)     max: 58.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17.7     avg: 27.3     median: 28.1 (5%)     max: 37.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.8     avg: 20.8     median: 17.3 (13%)     max: 35.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8565U → 100% n=48

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10210U → 103% n=48

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 27. 03:41:34

#0 checking url part for id 10082 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11459 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.037s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10082 +0.018s ... 0.055s

#7 got single benchmarks 10082 +0.225s ... 0.28s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11459 +0.019s ... 0.299s

#9 got single benchmarks 11459 +0.175s ... 0.474s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.474s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.515s ... 0.989s

#12 return log +0.038s ... 1.027s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)