Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-14900HX vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

Intel Core i9-14900HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900HX

The Intel Core i9-14900HX is a high-end CPU based on the Raptor Lake architecture for large and heavy notebooks. The CPU was introduced at the beginning of 2024 and is a slightly higher clocked variant of the older Core i9-13980HX.

The total of 32 threads are divided into P-cores and E-cores, which we already know from Alder-Lake. Here, 8 performance cores (P-cores) with hyperthreading are used and 16 efficiency cores, so that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously. The P-cores clock from 2.2 GHz (base clock) to 5.8 GHz (single-core turbo) and the E-cores from 1.6 GHz to 4.1 GHz.

Performance

Due to the slightly higher maximum clock rates, the single-core performance of the 14900HX in particular increases slightly compared to the 13980HX. Compared to AMD's top model, the Ryzen 9 7945HX or 7945HX3D the 14900HX comes in just behind (on average in our benchmarks). However, the performance depends on the benchmark and the cooling and is usually very comparable.

Graphics

Like the Intel Core i9-12900HX, the Intel Core i9-14900HX offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris XE architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

The 14900HX is manufactured on the improved 10nm FinFET process at Intel (Intel 7 process) and is specified with 55 watts of base power and 157 watts of turbo power.

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core i9-14900HXIntel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
CodenameRaptor Lake-HX RefreshMeteor Lake-HMeteor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core i9-14900HX « 1.6 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700HX3.9 - 5.5 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14650HX1.6 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500HX1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14450HX1.8 - 4.8 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock1600 - 5800 MHz3800 - 4800 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB
L3 Cache36 MB24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.1 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP55 Watt28 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2157 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm7 nm
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C110 °C
SocketBGA1964BGA2049BGA2049
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1650 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900HX
46.8 pt (78%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
37.6 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
39.3 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 118.8     avg: 127.2     median: 128.5 (72%)     max: 131.7 Points
min: 96     avg: 102.7     median: 102.3 (57%)     max: 108 Points
min: 103     avg: 108.2     median: 108.1 (61%)     max: 112.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 817     avg: 1544     median: 1592 (30%)     max: 2071 Points
min: 323     avg: 776     median: 789 (15%)     max: 1024 Points
min: 828     avg: 1003     median: 1021 (19%)     max: 1096 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 17078     avg: 28872     median: 30055 (28%)     max: 36249 Points
min: 9769     avg: 14965     median: 15028 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
min: 12688     avg: 18030     median: 18338 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1720     avg: 2150     median: 2181.5 (92%)     max: 2245 Points
min: 1496     avg: 1726     median: 1743 (73%)     max: 1815 Points
min: 1620     avg: 1818     median: 1812 (76%)     max: 1912 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 657     avg: 825     median: 833.5 (91%)     max: 859 Points
min: 601     avg: 665     median: 670.5 (73%)     max: 696 Points
min: 622     avg: 701     median: 702 (77%)     max: 735 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6579     avg: 10958     median: 11419 (28%)     max: 13832 Points
min: 3798     avg: 5795     median: 5762.5 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
min: 4843     avg: 6957     median: 7192 (18%)     max: 7651 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3263     avg: 4437     median: 4574 (29%)     max: 5589 Points
min: 1932     avg: 2449     median: 2450 (15%)     max: 2880 Points
min: 1581.9     avg: 2762     median: 2853 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 247     avg: 305.2     median: 310.5 (86%)     max: 323 Points
min: 99.6     avg: 249.5     median: 255 (71%)     max: 268 Points
min: 238     avg: 267.1     median: 268 (75%)     max: 281 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 40.14     avg: 43.8     median: 43.8 (57%)     max: 47.36 Points
min: 27.11     avg: 30.5     median: 30.7 (40%)     max: 33.49 Points
min: 33.95     avg: 34.7     median: 34.6 (45%)     max: 35.55 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.45     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (83%)     max: 3.54 Points
min: 2.77     avg: 3     median: 3 (72%)     max: 3.13 Points
min: 3.11     avg: 3.2     median: 3.1 (75%)     max: 3.27 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11078     avg: 11120     median: 11120 (67%)     max: 11162 Points
min: 8808     avg: 9492     median: 9619.5 (58%)     max: 9919 Points
min: 9719     avg: 9994     median: 9977.5 (60%)     max: 10300 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 63617     avg: 67898     median: 67897.5 (49%)     max: 72178 Points
min: 50589     avg: 56540     median: 57550 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
min: 59935     avg: 63422     median: 63273.5 (46%)     max: 67204 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 95056     avg: 98368     median: 98367.5 (63%)     max: 101679 Points
min: 13726     avg: 67393     median: 80420 (51%)     max: 95005 Points
min: 88902     avg: 90904     median: 91265.5 (58%)     max: 92183 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 16204     avg: 16337     median: 16336.5 (20%)     max: 16469 Points
min: 12270     avg: 30347     median: 13508.5 (16%)     max: 82102 Points
min: 13892     avg: 14147     median: 14161 (17%)     max: 14374 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 104.117     avg: 160     median: 160 (2%)     max: 215.805 s
min: 92.544     avg: 146.2     median: 139.6 (2%)     max: 206.526 s
min: 87.408     avg: 215.6     median: 165.1 (2%)     max: 441.275 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.806     avg: 3     median: 3 (1%)     max: 3.126 s
min: 3.523     avg: 3.8     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.041 s
min: 3.254     avg: 4.3     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 10376     avg: 10937     median: 10936.5 (17%)     max: 11497 Points
min: 6137     avg: 6921     median: 6911.5 (11%)     max: 7723 Points
min: 6724     avg: 9769     median: 7940 (13%)     max: 17856 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66769     avg: 111970     median: 115640 (66%)     max: 136645 MIPS
min: 41739     avg: 59108     median: 60595 (35%)     max: 70254 MIPS
min: 52522     avg: 70203     median: 71934 (41%)     max: 76331 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5452     avg: 7056     median: 7151.5 (84%)     max: 7545 MIPS
min: 4594     avg: 5330     median: 5398 (64%)     max: 5621 MIPS
min: 4502     avg: 5480     median: 5560 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 152.7     avg: 176.6     median: 176.6 (59%)     max: 200.5 fps
min: 120.65     avg: 136.4     median: 135.4 (45%)     max: 154.15 fps
min: 153.6     avg: 159.7     median: 159.9 (53%)     max: 165.6 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 337     avg: 350     median: 350 (81%)     max: 363 fps
min: 282.57     avg: 302.1     median: 300.5 (69%)     max: 325 fps
min: 300.5     avg: 322.4     median: 326.3 (75%)     max: 336.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.8     avg: 29.3     median: 30.1 (53%)     max: 38.9 fps
min: 9.93     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
min: 14.1     avg: 20.1     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (51%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
min: 0.96     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 3.2     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (61%)     max: 3.9 GB/s
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
min: 1.4     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (31%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 16.4     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (43%)     max: 16.5 GB/s
min: 9.3     avg: 10.3     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.9 GB/s
min: 7.9     avg: 10.8     median: 11.3 (29%)     max: 12.1 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 155     avg: 215.1     median: 205 (3%)     max: 394 Seconds
min: 296     avg: 413.3     median: 380 (5%)     max: 692 Seconds
min: 280     avg: 331.7     median: 309 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 91     avg: 121     median: 113 (1%)     max: 206 Seconds
min: 175     avg: 232.5     median: 220 (2%)     max: 381 Seconds
min: 163     avg: 188.6     median: 177 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3604     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.4859 sec
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.53 sec
min: 0.4313     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14839     avg: 18676     median: 19451 (41%)     max: 20788 Points
min: 12066     avg: 12936     median: 12712.5 (27%)     max: 14729 Points
min: 9854     avg: 13153     median: 13074 (28%)     max: 15529 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 5.837     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (1%)     max: 5.928 s
min: 7.046     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.087 s
min: 6.6     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.256 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 12.965     avg: 13.2     median: 13.1 (1%)     max: 13.328 s
min: 15.701     avg: 16.2     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 17.277 s
min: 14.786     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (1%)     max: 15.15 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 305.103     avg: 308.5     median: 308.5 (1%)     max: 311.83 s
min: 394.754     avg: 413.2     median: 400.3 (2%)     max: 444.482 s
min: 304.446     avg: 358     median: 366.9 (2%)     max: 402.742 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 81852     avg: 81973     median: 81973 (63%)     max: 82094 Points
min: 61131     avg: 65940     median: 63514 (49%)     max: 74620 Points
min: 73186     avg: 76512     median: 75742.5 (58%)     max: 80494 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 16205     avg: 23321     median: 24017 (59%)     max: 29134 Points
min: 6531     avg: 18376     median: 19092.5 (47%)     max: 23779 Points
min: 12693     avg: 21337     median: 22169.5 (55%)     max: 24629 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 92914     avg: 97333     median: 97111.5 (79%)     max: 102194 Points
min: 53255     avg: 77249     median: 77292.5 (63%)     max: 93608 Points
min: 74638     avg: 81658     median: 76996.5 (63%)     max: 100241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 86115     avg: 95301     median: 94260 (76%)     max: 101593 Points
min: 66925     avg: 75901     median: 72861.5 (59%)     max: 90957 Points
min: 73618     avg: 82055     median: 75494 (61%)     max: 100192 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 94081     avg: 98844     median: 99882 (83%)     max: 102469 Points
min: 84880     avg: 88438     median: 88437.5 (73%)     max: 91995 Points
min: 78677     avg: 89559     median: 91059 (76%)     max: 102469 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16565     avg: 21102     median: 22007.5 (56%)     max: 24768 Points
min: 7073     avg: 15332     median: 15194 (38%)     max: 19549 Points
min: 14341     avg: 18938     median: 18896 (48%)     max: 21425 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 11759     avg: 37541     median: 38821 (69%)     max: 46710 Points
min: 5249     avg: 22618     median: 23177 (41%)     max: 28337 Points
min: 21106     avg: 28071     median: 28964.5 (52%)     max: 30623 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12191     avg: 16418     median: 16783 (71%)     max: 18847 Points
min: 3922     avg: 9000     median: 9454.5 (40%)     max: 12145 Points
min: 6307     avg: 10957     median: 11454.5 (48%)     max: 12209 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2419     avg: 2966     median: 3013 (75%)     max: 3129 Points
min: 1901     avg: 2377     median: 2409 (60%)     max: 2473 Points
min: 2199     avg: 2483     median: 2495 (62%)     max: 2573 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 13158     avg: 17401     median: 17606.5 (68%)     max: 19665 Points
min: 7732     avg: 12275     median: 12385 (48%)     max: 13656 Points
min: 12825     avg: 13823     median: 13974 (54%)     max: 14540 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2771     avg: 2963     median: 2963 (94%)     max: 3105 Points
min: 2167     avg: 2588     median: 2313 (73%)     max: 3105 Points
min: 2410     avg: 2931     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 15218     avg: 17953     median: 17720.5 (73%)     max: 21003 Points
min: 10787     avg: 15361     median: 12061 (50%)     max: 21003 Points
min: 12735     avg: 18936     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1669     avg: 2092     median: 2123.5 (83%)     max: 2210 Points
min: 1462     avg: 1751     median: 1761.5 (69%)     max: 1824 Points
min: 1700     avg: 1828     median: 1852 (72%)     max: 1902 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8618     avg: 19527     median: 20002 (36%)     max: 23194 Points
min: 10017     avg: 12016     median: 12183.5 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
min: 10441     avg: 13368     median: 13566 (24%)     max: 14230 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1929     avg: 2037     median: 2050.5 (9%)     max: 2117 Points
min: 1556     avg: 1678     median: 1696 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
min: 1695     avg: 1788     median: 1799 (8%)     max: 1830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16611     avg: 19035     median: 18175.5 (57%)     max: 23176 Points
min: 11112     avg: 11906     median: 12025 (38%)     max: 12530 Points
min: 13228     avg: 13612     median: 13736 (43%)     max: 13972 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8705     avg: 8875     median: 8874.5 (89%)     max: 9044 Points
min: 6559     avg: 6879     median: 6927 (69%)     max: 7141 Points
min: 7040     avg: 7372     median: 7422 (74%)     max: 7602 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 58418     avg: 60787     median: 60787 (61%)     max: 63156 Points
min: 39509     avg: 43123     median: 43897 (44%)     max: 46412 Points
min: 47960     avg: 49362     median: 49781.5 (50%)     max: 49924 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 428     avg: 448.6     median: 443 (1%)     max: 535 ms
min: 416.4     avg: 541     median: 535 (1%)     max: 642 ms
min: 494     avg: 524     median: 522 (1%)     max: 594 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 104490     avg: 109643     median: 109502 (83%)     max: 115768 Points
min: 77142     avg: 88549     median: 89268 (67%)     max: 97162 Points
min: 90543     avg: 95362     median: 96090 (73%)     max: 98144 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 246     avg: 300.7     median: 303 (83%)     max: 321 Points
min: 166.4     avg: 251.8     median: 255 (70%)     max: 309 Points
min: 237     avg: 258.7     median: 260 (71%)     max: 271 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 269     avg: 324.4     median: 327 (59%)     max: 345 Points
min: 213     avg: 276.5     median: 278.5 (50%)     max: 299 Points
min: 237     avg: 279.4     median: 286 (51%)     max: 301 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1877     avg: 2148     median: 2162 (81%)     max: 2344 Points
min: 1366     avg: 1663     median: 1685.5 (63%)     max: 1903 Points
min: 1589     avg: 1774     median: 1770 (66%)     max: 1971 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 73.6     avg: 170     median: 173.1 (30%)     max: 318 Watt
min: 37.1     avg: 74.8     median: 72.8 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
min: 44.4     avg: 113.4     median: 123.8 (21%)     max: 176.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 121.8     avg: 216.7     median: 219 (40%)     max: 301 Watt
min: 46.9     avg: 89.4     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
min: 88     avg: 129.5     median: 124.6 (23%)     max: 171.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.59     avg: 24.9     median: 26.8 (18%)     max: 35.1 Watt
min: 2.42     avg: 7.2     median: 6.1 (4%)     max: 24.2 Watt
min: 5.1     avg: 12.4     median: 11.7 (8%)     max: 21.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 9.03     avg: 19.7     median: 18.1 (20%)     max: 35.2 Watt
min: 2.83     avg: 10.1     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 90.3 Watt
min: 5.18     avg: 13.7     median: 11.9 (13%)     max: 28.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 16     avg: 21.4     median: 20.8 (15%)     max: 27.1 Points per Watt
min: 17.7     avg: 30.9     median: 28.6 (21%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt
min: 17.8     avg: 27.4     median: 24.2 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900HX → 100% n=55

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 73% n=55

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 81% n=55

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 30. 14:48:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17163 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751287720s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Jun 2025 05:20:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17163 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 17163 +0.043s ... 0.057s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.006s ... 0.063s

#11 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.066s ... 0.129s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.005s ... 0.133s

#13 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.032s ... 0.166s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.166s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.146s ... 0.312s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.312s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)