Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 review: A premium laptop with an RTX 4070 for gamers and creators

Brilliant display.

While the Nitro V 16 that we tested recently only impressed us a limited amount due to its poor display, the Predator Triton Neo 16 cut a much better figure. We put the 16-inch gamer with a Meteor Lake CPU and a GeForce RTX 4070 to the test.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Intel Meteor Lake Arc Nvidia Geforce Gaming Laptop

Verdict - Eye candy from Acer

If you're on the hunt for a high-quality and sleek gaming and creating laptop, then the Predator Triton Neo 16 may just be the one for you. Acer hasn't only given the 16-inch device an absurdly long name, but also a stable metal case whose silver-gray surfaces barely attract any fingerprint marks. Its connectivity options aren't all too shabby either thanks to its USB 4 support. In addition, the Neo 16's picture quality is similarly impressive. Its 165-Hz screen based on IPS technology delivers good brightness levels, a high resolution (3,200 x 2,000 pixels), generous color space coverage and, thanks to its Calman certification, a respectable color accuracy.

Its GPU performance, on the other hand, isn't quite as impressive. The GeForce RTX 4070 can only develop a limited part of its potential performance and balances out below our previously determined average. Furthermore, there aren't many maintenance and upgrade options. Although the 16-inch device has two M.2 slots (one of which is still free), its RAM has been soldered on—whereby the 32 GB that our test device features should probably be enough for most users for the time being. All-in-all, we would rate the Predator Triton Neo 16 as a good but not outstanding gaming and creating laptop.

The competition includes other 16-inch devices with an RTX 4070 such as the Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI, Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9, Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605M and the Alienware m16 R2, which are generally more expensive, however.

Pros

+ sleek and high-quality case
+ bright and vivid display
+ two M.2 slots (one unoccupied)
+ solid battery life
+ good input devices
+ USB 4

Cons

- RTX 4070 performs below its possibilities
- fan control could be better
- RAM can't be swapped out
- average sound
- SSD is throttled

Price and availability

Currently, the Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P is available via major online retailers such as Amazon, where it costs $1,399.

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
81.1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $1,640.58
acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ...
2. $1,719.99
acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ...
3. $1,869.99
acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ...
List Price: 1900 EUR
2 kg21 mm16.00"
3200x2000
236 PPI
IPS
2.
87.8%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $2,879.00
HIDevolution [2024] ASUS Pro...
2. $93.99
20V 10A 200W Laptop Charger ...
3. $97.99
200W Charger for Asus ROG Ze...
List Price: 4000€
1.8 kg17.3 mm16.00"
3840x2400
283 PPI
OLED
3.
88.7% v7 (old)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $1,899.99
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16"" Lapt...
2. $35.00
Laptop Keyboard for Lenovo Y...
3. $1,679.00
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i Laptop, I...
List Price: 2700€
2.1 kg18.3 mm16.00"
3200x2000
236 PPI
Mini-LED
4.
92.3% v7 (old)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $1,899.99
List Price: 3000€
1.8 kg16.4 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
OLED
5.
90.2% v7 (old)
Alienware m16 R2
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $1,949.00
List Price: 1850 USD
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
IPS

Acer has equipped our test configuration with a Core Ultra 9 185H from the Meteor Lake series and—as mentioned earlier—with a GeForce RTX 4070. It also features an impressive 32 GB of LPDDR5X RAM. The installed NVMe SSD has a capacity of 1 TB. The laptop's screen has a 16:10 aspect ratio and its operating system is Windows 11 Home. Its battery capacity of 76 Wh is neither low nor particularly generous.

Specifications

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P (Predator Triton Neo 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 16 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 85 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1695 MHz, RAM: 1975 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 566.36, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5X soldered (no expansion)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3200 x 2000 pixel 236 PPI, AU Optronics B160QAN04.S, IPS, Calman Verified, glossy: no, 165 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N, 1024 GB 
, NVMe-SSD, two M.2 slots (one empty)
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Combined (Line-In/Out), Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW) (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21 x 356 x 249 ( = 0.83 x 14.02 x 9.8 in)
Battery
76 Wh
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W Power Supply, Predator Sense, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.032 kg ( = 71.68 oz / 4.48 pounds), Power Supply: 795 g ( = 28.04 oz / 1.75 pounds)
Price
1900 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case

One of the biggest highlights of the Predator Triton is its elegant and nice-looking case. Its metal surfaces leave a high-quality impression and barely attract fingerprints thanks to its light color. The case's stability is equally good, with the exception of a few details (the touchpad gives way quite a bit in places). Acer also deserves praise for the device's well-functioning hinges, although their maximum opening angle of approx. 135° could be a little wider. On the other hand, we have nothing to criticize about its build quality.

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16

With its weight of around 2 kg, the 16-inch device lies between its competitors, which all weigh between 1.8 and 2.5 kg. Their height and basic dimensions are similar: Here too, the Acer laptop makes itself comfortable in the midfield.

Size comparison

363.9 mm / 14.3 in 249.4 mm / 9.82 in 23.5 mm / 0.925 in 2.5 kg5.44 lbs362.72 mm / 14.3 in 253.69 mm / 9.99 in 18.3 mm / 0.72 in 2.1 kg4.57 lbs356 mm / 14 in 249 mm / 9.8 in 21 mm / 0.827 in 2 kg4.48 lbs354.9 mm / 14 in 246.9 mm / 9.72 in 17.3 mm / 0.681 in 1.8 kg3.99 lbs354 mm / 13.9 in 246 mm / 9.69 in 16.4 mm / 0.646 in 1.8 kg4.01 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity

Ports

The Neo 16 offers a wide range of ports. While the left side houses the power connection, an audio jack and two USB-C ports (1x USB 4 with DisplayPort 1.4 & PowerDelivery), the right side is equipped with a micro SD card reader, two USB-A ports (3.1 Gen 2), HDMI 2.1 and an opening for Kensington locks. Even so, Acer should have added an RJ45 port to the device to secure it a very good connectivity rating.

Left side: Power, USB-C 4 (incl. DisplayPort 1.4 & PowerDelivery), USB-C 3.1 Gen 2, audio
Left side: Power, USB-C 4 (incl. DisplayPort 1.4 & PowerDelivery), USB-C 3.1 Gen 2, audio
Right side: microSD, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen 2, HDMI 2.1, Kensington Lock
Right side: microSD, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen 2, HDMI 2.1, Kensington Lock

SD card reader

The laptop's card reader achieved mediocre speeds of around 90 MB/s during our test. The Alienware m16 and the Asus ProArt P16 did much better when it came to sequential reading.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
127 MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 197.3, n=80, last 2 years)
91.9 MB/s +6%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
87 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
78.7 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
78.3 MB/s -10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75.3 MB/s -13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
254.4 MB/s +183%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
205.32 MB/s +128%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=80, last 2 years)
115.6 MB/s +28%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
89.9 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
89.9 MB/s 0%

Communication

Its wireless module goes by the name Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x and performed solidly (transmitting) to very well (receiving) during our connection speed test at a distance of 1 meter from the reference router.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1788 (1649min - 1890max) MBit/s +108%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1654 (1599min, 1600.16P1 - 1713max) MBit/s +93%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1650 (1445min - 1723max) MBit/s +92%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=140, last 2 years)
1225 MBit/s +43%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1205 (875min - 1438max) MBit/s +40%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
859 (707min - 1085max) MBit/s
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
  (703 - 859, n=5)
779 MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1711 (1658min - 1732max) MBit/s
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1699 (1607min - 1729max) MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1654 (1568min - 1702max) MBit/s -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1600 (1564min, 1564.87P1 - 1627max) MBit/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1744, n=140, last 2 years)
1394 MBit/s -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1227 (1074min - 1317max) MBit/s -28%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
  (774 - 1711, n=5)
1021 MBit/s -40%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø859 (707-1085)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1788 (1649-1890)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1650 (1445-1723)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1654 (1599-1713)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1205 (875-1438)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1711 (1658-1732)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1698 (1607-1729)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1654 (1568-1702)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1600 (1564-1627)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1227 (1074-1317)

Webcam

The device's 2MP webcam is slightly sharper and more color-accurate than on most gaming laptops, but you can't expect any miracles. There is no cover for added privacy.

ColorChecker
4.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P: 5.29 ∆E min: 1.77 - max: 10.67 ∆E

Accessories

The Acer laptop comes with a 230-watt power supply and multiple information leaflets.

Maintenance

The fairly tight-fitting base plate is secured with 11 Torx screws. Inside, the picture is quite tidy and straightforward. Apart from the wireless module, only the SSD and the battery can be removed. The laptop's cooling system (which, according to Acer, uses liquid metal) consists of two fans and several heat pipes.

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16

Sustainability

Acer refers to "Post Consumer Recycled" on one of the case stickers. The packaging material consists mainly of cardboard. The laptop is packed in a cloth bag, and the power supply unit is in a plastic film (each type is labeled).

Warranty

The laptop is covered by a standard 12-month warranty in the USA.

Input devices

Keyboard

For a rubber dome model, the keyboard delivers more than decent feedback and typing feel. Acer has chosen a fairly classic layout, whereby the manufacturer has spared a number pad and limited itself to a single column to the right of the "main block", which is intended for media control and for opening the Predator Sense system software. With the exception of the function row, all keys are reasonably sized—including the directional arrows. Gamers can look forward to multi-level adjustable RGB lighting divided into three zones.

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16

Touchpad

With a size of 15 x 9 cm, the device's touchpad is extremely generously sized, but in our opinion could have been a bit more stable, as left clicks in particular lead to some noticeable yielding. We would describe its surface as being nice and smooth. We also have nothing to criticize about its gesture and multi-touch support.

Display

In contrast to the Nitro V 16, which has to make do with a limited color space and relatively low brightness, the Predator Triton Neo 16 boasts a high-quality IPS panel.

483
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B160QAN04.S tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 483 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 453.2 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 458 cd/m²
Contrast: 1090:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 0.77
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
85.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.201
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
AU Optronics B160QAN04.S, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Alienware m16 R2
BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Display
7%
2%
7%
-14%
Display P3 Coverage
94.2
99.9
6%
97
3%
99.9
6%
71
-25%
sRGB Coverage
99.7
100
0%
99.9
0%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.3
99.1
16%
86.6
2%
96.9
14%
71.4
-16%
Response Times
83%
-137%
97%
2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.3 ?(5.9, 6.4)
1.58 ?(0.84, 0.74)
87%
22.2 ?(9.6, 12.6)
-80%
0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11)
98%
5.7 ?(2.6, 3.1)
54%
Response Time Black / White *
5.8 ?(2.2, 3.6)
1.25 ?(0.67, 0.58)
78%
17 ?(8.2, 8.8)
-193%
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
96%
8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1)
-50%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(52, 93)
4840 ?(100)
960 ?(60)
Screen
11%
29%
2%
-2%
Brightness middle
458
355
-22%
651
42%
416
-9%
345.8
-24%
Brightness
453
360
-21%
673
49%
418
-8%
337
-26%
Brightness Distribution
90
98
9%
93
3%
96
7%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.42
0.22
48%
0.3
29%
Contrast
1090
2959
171%
1153
6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.58
1.2
24%
1.9
-20%
1.6
-1%
1.99
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.47
2.6
25%
4.2
-21%
2.1
39%
3.52
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.77
0.6
22%
0.62
19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
1.2
48%
3
-30%
2.7
-17%
2.1
9%
Gamma
2.201 100%
2.14 103%
2.18 101%
2.16 102%
2.32 95%
CCT
6540 99%
6526 100%
6738 96%
6331 103%
6369 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
34% / 23%
-35% / -0%
35% / 20%
-5% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

An average brightness of 453 cd/m² is not only sufficient for indoor use but—depending on the lighting conditions—also for outdoor use. Meanwhile, its contrast ratio is only solid at just under 1,100:1, which is due to its poor black level (0.42 cd/m²). Here, the OLED panels of some competitors show how it can be done better, and the same can be said for its response times (although these are quite good for an IPS panel).

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

On the flip side, the Acer laptop features a low-reflection surface and does not experience any flickering at any brightness level.

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 vs sRGB
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 vs sRGB
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 vs AdobeRGB
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 vs AdobeRGB
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 vs DCI-P3
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 vs DCI-P3

The Neo 16 aims to appeal to professional users with its large color space: Almost 100% sRGB coverage, 94% of DCI-P3 and 85% of AdobeRGB make the 16-inch offshoot a true creator product. Thanks to its Calman verification, the colors already look quite natural straight out of the box. The package is rounded off by reasonable viewing angles.

Daylight
Daylight
Sub-pixels
Sub-pixels
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.2 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.9 ms rise
↘ 6.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8623 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

100 % brightness
100 % brightness
75 % brightness
75 % brightness
50 % brightness
50 % brightness
25 % brightness
25 % brightness
0 % brightness
0 % brightness

Performance

The performance of our test version PTN16-51-978P is in the (upper) mid-range. The Predator Triton Neo 16 starts at just under $1,200. The entry-level model comes with a WQXGA display (2,560 x 1,600 pixels, 240 Hz), a Core Ultra 7 155H, a GeForce RTX 4060, 16 GB RAM and a 1-TB SSD.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

Testing conditions

Users can choose from four different profiles, some of which differ significantly in terms of performance and noise development. As Turbo mode is very loud in 3D mode (almost 58 dB), we opted for Performance mode during our tests, which offers slightly less performance, but also ensures a significantly lower (albeit still high) operating noise.

Predator Sense
Predator Sense
Predator Sense
Predator Sense
Predator Sense
Predator Sense
Predator Sense
Predator Sense
Predator Sense
Predator Sense
Cyberpunk 2077 Loop sequence (FHD/Ultra) Quiet Balanced Performance Turbo
Noise 39 dB(A) 47 dB(A) 50 dB(A) 58 dB(A)
Performance 32 fps 62 fps 66 fps 74 fps
GPU board power draw max. 53 watts max. 66 watts max. 76 watts max. 116 watts

Processor

The Core Ultra 9 185H is a powerful laptop processor with 16 cores (three different core types), which can process up to 22 threads simultaneously via hyper-threading. In our benchmark course, the CPU performance ranked approximately at the level of our previously determined average for the Ultra 9 185H. However, the Ultra 7 155H, which is found in some competitors, was often barely slower (the Alienware m16 even came slightly ahead in the overall rating). The Cinebench loop also showed that the Acer laptop's results weren't particularly constant, but rather showed some fluctuations. However, neither Intel model stood a chance against AMD's Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

017535052570087510501225140015751750192521002275245026252800297531503325Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2755 (2385.5-2930.83)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3476 (3466.5-3497.73)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2931 (2869.44-3004.58)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2777 (2743.86-2839.9)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
85.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
80 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
77.3 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
73.1 pt
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
70.6 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
 
70.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68.8 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
23750 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=172, last 2 years)
21752 Points +13%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
19851 Points +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
19248 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18419 (18019.3min - 18419.5max) Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (12688 - 19851, n=19)
17767 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17267 Points -10%
Single Core
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2044 Points +17%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1906 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=172, last 2 years)
1889 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (1166 - 1912, n=19)
1787 Points +2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1754 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1681 Points -4%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
9246 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=172, last 2 years)
8309 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7651 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7546 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7050 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (4843 - 7651, n=19)
6862 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6682 Points -11%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
804 Points +21%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
735 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=172, last 2 years)
726 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (442 - 735, n=19)
689 Points +3%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
674 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
666 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3498 (3466.5min - 3497.73max) Points +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=178, last 2 years)
3401 Points +16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3005 (2869.44min - 3004.58max) Points +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2931 (2385.5min - 2930.83max) Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2840 (2743.86min - 2839.9max) Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (1582 - 3165, n=21)
2729 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2679 (2383.65min - 2679.17max) Points -9%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
310 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
280 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=175, last 2 years)
278 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
276 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
264 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (191.9 - 281, n=19)
264 Points -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -7%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
193 Seconds * -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (163 - 285, n=19)
191.1 Seconds * -8%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
177 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=167, last 2 years)
170.9 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
163 Seconds * +8%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
140 Seconds * +21%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=171, last 2 years)
84979 MIPS +16%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
83354 MIPS +14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
76331 MIPS +4%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
73378 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (51738 - 76331, n=19)
69330 MIPS -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68500 MIPS -7%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
67581 MIPS -8%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=171, last 2 years)
6318 MIPS +13%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6179 MIPS +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5781 MIPS +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5594 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5439 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (4199 - 5781, n=19)
5427 MIPS -3%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5037 MIPS -10%
Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15367 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=115, last 2 years)
14194 Points +1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14031 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14001 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (9140 - 14540, n=19)
13602 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13323 Points -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12670 Points -10%
Single-Core
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2877 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=115, last 2 years)
2650 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2570 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (1490 - 2573, n=19)
2430 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2410 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2399 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2383 Points -1%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15012 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=171, last 2 years)
14999 Points +7%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14072 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13936 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (9330 - 14230, n=19)
13179 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12905 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12328 Points -12%
Single-Core
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2066 Points +20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1902 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=171, last 2 years)
1900 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (986 - 1902, n=19)
1779 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points +2%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1741 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1726 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
24.6 fps +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=171, last 2 years)
23.4 fps +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
22.7 fps +12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
21.2 fps +4%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.3 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.9 fps -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (14.1 - 22.7, n=19)
19.9 fps -2%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
73.5 s *
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
56.1 s * +24%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.8 s * +32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.6 s * +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 96.6, n=168, last 2 years)
47.3 s * +36%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (34.5 - 73.5, n=19)
46.1 s * +37%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
39.7 s * +46%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.487 sec * -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (0.4313 - 0.759, n=20)
0.47 sec * -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4654 sec * -4%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4486 sec *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4457 sec * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=172, last 2 years)
0.4369 sec * +3%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
0.4041 sec * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2931 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
177.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
276 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
666 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7546 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
19248 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1754 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
111 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1027 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI -2!
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
93.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
84.8 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77 pt
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74.8 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.4 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
 
70.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68.9 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=168, last 2 years)
22029 KRay/s +18%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
18621 KRay/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
18470 KRay/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
18446 KRay/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16431 KRay/s -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (9220 - 18676, n=19)
16396 KRay/s -12%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
147248 Points +54%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=168, last 2 years)
106904 Points +12%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95572 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95213 Points 0%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
92996 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85461 Points -11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (48865 - 96463, n=19)
85141 Points -11%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5843 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=168, last 2 years)
4895 MB/s +14%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4296 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4278 MB/s 0%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4242 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (2394 - 4534, n=19)
3982 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3814 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=168, last 2 years)
116943 Points +24%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94661 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94527 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94395 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90347 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (66785 - 95241, n=19)
89708 Points -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84180 Points -11%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
19021 Points +68%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=168, last 2 years)
13301 Points +18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11392 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11312 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10641 Points -6%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10617 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (7255 - 11392, n=19)
10546 Points -7%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=168, last 2 years)
53831 Points +16%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47685 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47315 Points +2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
46435 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41806 Points -10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (24004 - 48020, n=19)
41756 Points -10%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=168, last 2 years)
108262 MB/s +19%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94250 MB/s +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (53116 - 154066, n=19)
91381 MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90860 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82757 MB/s -9%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81929 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79475 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1520 MB/s +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=168, last 2 years)
1357 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1297 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1295 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1219 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (678 - 1341, n=19)
1163 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
20608 KRay/s +114%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=168, last 2 years)
11855 KRay/s +23%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9802 KRay/s +2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9768 KRay/s +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9631 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (4428 - 10078, n=19)
8582 KRay/s -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8449 KRay/s -12%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
53918 MPixel/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49238 MPixel/s +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (44547 - 53918, n=19)
48798 MPixel/s +10%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
48273 MPixel/s +8%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44547 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=168, last 2 years)
40412 MPixel/s -9%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39532 MPixel/s -11%

System performance

There were no surprises when it came to system performance. 7,443 points in PCMark 10 are typical for a device with these components or from this performance class.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=153, last 2 years)
7821 Points +5%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7761 Points +4%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7752 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7443 - 7761, n=4)
7560 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
7547 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
7443 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7123 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
11133 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12600, n=153, last 2 years)
10816 Points +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9728 - 11133, n=4)
10451 Points +7%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10330 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10038 Points +3%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10009 Points +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
9728 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=153, last 2 years)
9927 Points +4%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9891 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
9555 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9422 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9067 - 9555, n=4)
9347 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9208 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
9067 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13035 Points +8%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
12771 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=153, last 2 years)
12227 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (11369 - 13194, n=4)
12039 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
12037 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
11554 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10612 Points -12%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=133, last 2 years)
1913 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1794 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1663 - 1917, n=3)
1766 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1762 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1721 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1719 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=133, last 2 years)
1813 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1684 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1573 - 1849, n=3)
1678 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1624 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1611 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1611 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2270 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=133, last 2 years)
2099 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1993 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1872 - 2008, n=3)
1958 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1942 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1913 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=133, last 2 years)
1712 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1576 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1338 - 1856, n=3)
1525 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1424 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1338 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1225 Points
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=145, last 2 years)
303 Points +12%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
298 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
295 Points +9%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
294 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
283 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (240 - 295, n=5)
272 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
270 Points
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
270 Points 0%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
268 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 328, n=135, last 2 years)
267 Points +7%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
257 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
256 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (248 - 268, n=5)
255 Points +2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
249 Points
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
249 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
244 Points -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
549 ms *
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
549 ms * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
548 ms * -0%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
546 ms * +1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (494 - 549, n=5)
525 ms * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=159, last 2 years)
503 ms * +8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
494 ms * +10%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
439 ms * +20%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7443 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94254 MB/s +19%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89675 MB/s +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89414 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (69929 - 95718, n=19)
84413 MB/s +6%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79538 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=168, last 2 years)
65939 MB/s -17%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63008 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
100415 MB/s +39%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87768 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86576 MB/s +20%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (64619 - 87768, n=19)
79657 MB/s +10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76370 MB/s +5%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72422 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=168, last 2 years)
69724 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
100176 MB/s +35%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75773 MB/s +2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74436 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73337 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (51114 - 93871, n=19)
72498 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=168, last 2 years)
67887 MB/s -9%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66009 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (121.4 - 259, n=19)
145.5 ns * -3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
141.5 ns *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140 ns * +1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
129.6 ns * +8%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.2 ns * +11%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113.2 ns * +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=168, last 2 years)
94.4 ns * +33%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

Acer could do with improving its latencies. The LatencyMon tool revealed quite high values, but the same could be said for some competitors. Only the Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16 remained below the 1,000 µs mark.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
3414 μs *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2484.4 μs * +27%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2037.7 μs * +40%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
464.1 μs * +86%

* ... smaller is better

Storage device

On the other hand, the Predator Triton impressed with its super fast 1 TB SSD (SK Hynix PC801). According to our performance rating, the Acer laptop took the top position among the comparison devices. However, it should be mentioned that there were strong performance fluctuations under prolonged load, which wasn't the case with the competition (see DiskSpd loop).

SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7052 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 976.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 608.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 397.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2957 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 976.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 59.48 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 228.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
94.2 pt
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
 
94 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
71.8 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
63.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47.4 pt
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
41 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (3772 - 5314, n=2)
4543 MB/s +20%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4480 (4426.62min - 4479.73max) MB/s +19%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
3772 (3723.81min - 3772.36max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=150, last 2 years)
3427 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3202 (3129.61min - 3201.93max) MB/s -15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2757 (2720.02min - 2757.13max) MB/s -27%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2119 (2090.65min - 2119.22max) MB/s -44%
seq write
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (5276 - 5300, n=2)
5288 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
5276 (5235.14min - 5275.95max) MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4371 (4342.15min - 4371.09max) MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=150, last 2 years)
3792 MB/s -28%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3474 (3404.52min - 3474.32max) MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2526 (2498.97min - 2525.81max) MB/s -52%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2138 (1936.3min - 2137.63max) MB/s -59%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7079 (6575.14min - 7078.73max) MB/s +3%
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (6856 - 7150, n=2)
7003 MB/s +2%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
6856 (6264.4min - 6855.93max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
6257 (5307.47min - 6256.78max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=150, last 2 years)
6169 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5008 (4421.01min - 5007.74max) MB/s -27%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4785 (3105.25min - 4784.86max) MB/s -30%
seq q8 t1 write
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (6184 - 6519, n=2)
6352 MB/s +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
6184 (6135.32min - 6183.67max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
6040 (5907.05min - 6040.01max) MB/s -2%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5250 (5191.5min - 5250.22max) MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=150, last 2 years)
4771 MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3230 (3169.22min - 3230.03max) MB/s -48%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3109 (2917.35min - 3109.45max) MB/s -50%
4k q1 t1 read
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83.5 (82.8min - 83.52max) MB/s +4%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
80.3 (79.74min - 80.34max) MB/s
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (78.3 - 80.3, n=2)
79.3 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=150, last 2 years)
65.8 MB/s -18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
63.7 (63.29min - 63.65max) MB/s -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.9 (51.15min - 52.91max) MB/s -34%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
39.9 (39.46min - 39.9max) MB/s -50%
4k q1 t1 write
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (253 - 268, n=2)
261 MB/s +3%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
253 (248.67min - 252.62max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=150, last 2 years)
225 MB/s -11%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
198.1 (195.9min - 198.06max) MB/s -22%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
139.8 (135.84min - 139.76max) MB/s -45%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
128.4 (126.56min - 128.36max) MB/s -49%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
75.9 (71.09min - 75.93max) MB/s -70%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
4884 (4800.09min - 4884.18max) MB/s
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (4820 - 4884, n=2)
4852 MB/s -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3630 (3471.35min - 3629.9max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=150, last 2 years)
2627 MB/s -46%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
859 (816.31min - 859.16max) MB/s -82%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
604 (565.74min - 603.6max) MB/s -88%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
548 (543.4min - 547.55max) MB/s -89%
4k q32 t16 write
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (3073 - 3091, n=2)
3082 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
3073 (3055.16min - 3073.44max) MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3003 (2991.33min - 3002.71max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=150, last 2 years)
2172 MB/s -29%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
439 (405.1min - 438.82max) MB/s -86%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
402 (389.17min - 402.07max) MB/s -87%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
231 (200.24min - 231.41max) MB/s -92%
AS SSD
Score Total
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
9306 Points
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (8486 - 9306, n=2)
8896 Points -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8059 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=143, last 2 years)
6820 Points -27%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5214 Points -44%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3843 Points -59%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3272 Points -65%
Score Read
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
3081 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3005 Points -2%
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (2908 - 3081, n=2)
2995 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=143, last 2 years)
2456 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1397 Points -55%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1020 Points -67%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
962 Points -69%
Score Write
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
4656 Points
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (4106 - 4656, n=2)
4381 Points -6%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3573 Points -23%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3190 Points -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=143, last 2 years)
3170 Points -32%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2455 Points -47%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1808 Points -61%
Seq Read
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (5653 - 5687, n=2)
5670 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
5653.46 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5592.15 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5399 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=143, last 2 years)
4874 MB/s -14%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3776 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3662 MB/s -35%
Seq Write
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
5470.77 MB/s
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (5335 - 5471, n=2)
5403 MB/s -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4431.18 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=143, last 2 years)
3741 MB/s -32%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3314 MB/s -39%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2397 MB/s -56%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1921 MB/s -65%
4K Read
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
74.63 MB/s
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (70.3 - 74.6, n=2)
72.5 MB/s -3%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.52 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=143, last 2 years)
64.9 MB/s -13%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
64.2 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
42.2 MB/s -43%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
28.7 MB/s -62%
4K Write
Average SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
  (226 - 231, n=2)
229 MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
225.97 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (79.4 - 512, n=143, last 2 years)
213 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
183.8 MB/s -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
179.15 MB/s -21%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
<