Notebookcheck Logo

RedMagic Titan 16 Pro review: A gaming laptop made by a smartphone manufacturer

Debut.

The manufacturer Nubia, which is known for its gaming smartphones, has entered the market of gaming laptops with its RedMagic Titan 16 Pro: Core i9, a GeForce RTX 4060 and a 16-inch display (QHD+, DCI-P3, 240 Hz, G-Sync) all promise a solid mid-range device. Our review will reveal whether this initial launch was a success.

Regular visitors to this website may already be familiar with the "RedMagic" brand from the gaming smartphone segment (for example the Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro). The RedMagic Titan 16 Pro is Nubia's first foray into the gaming laptop world. Its data sheet holds no surprises: A Core i9-14900HX is paired with a GeForce RTX 4060. This is joined by a 16-inch screen with a 16:10 aspect ratio, Thunderbolt 4, DDR5 RAM and 2 SSD slots.

Whether Nubia can stand up to the already well-established competition remains to be seen. The Titan competes against the following devices: The Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9, HP Victus 16 (2024), Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) and the Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024).

Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 140 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2250 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP, GDDR6, 32.0.15.6081, Advanced Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Single-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (one in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS, G-Sync, DCI-P3, glossy: no, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 891 GB free
Soundcard
Conexant CX8070
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset combined port, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.9 x 358 x 262 ( = 0.94 x 14.09 x 10.31 in)
Battery
80.1 Wh, 5182 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: FHD + IR
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes
Weight
2.388 kg ( = 84.23 oz / 5.26 pounds), Power Supply: 860 g ( = 30.34 oz / 1.9 pounds)
Price
1759 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
81.2 %v8
08 / 2024
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
82.3 %v8
07 / 2024
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.55 mm16.00"2560x1600
84.3 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
HP Victus 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23.9 mm16.10"1920x1080
86.8 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg25.95 mm16.00"2560x1600
81.2 %v8
07 / 2024
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
83.2 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg25.1 mm16.00"1920x1200

Please note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.

Case - Nubia has gone for an aluminum case

You should always keep a cleaning cloth nearby: The matte-black case's surfaces are super sensitive to collecting fingerprint marks. The aluminum case's base unit and lid can only be twisted a small amount and we didn't encounter any build errors. Applying pressure to the back of the lid doesn't result in any image changes. The very tight hinges hold the lid firmly in position and it only wobbles minimally. Its maximum opening angle is 130 degrees and you can open it with one hand.

Along with the laptop's backlit keyboard, two LED elements bring some color into the mix: The RedMagic lettering on the hinge cover and the logo on the lid shine in all the colors of the rainbow. All elements can be controlled individually. The lettering also serves as a battery indicator: a red flashing light indicates a low charge level.

Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro

Within the comparison field, the Titan proves to be one of the most compact and lightweight devices. Even so, the differences compared to the competition are pretty small.

Size comparison

369 mm / 14.5 in 259.4 mm / 10.2 in 23.9 mm / 0.941 in 2.4 kg5.22 lbs363.4 mm / 14.3 in 261.75 mm / 10.3 in 26.55 mm / 1.045 in 2.5 kg5.43 lbs361 mm / 14.2 in 259 mm / 10.2 in 25.1 mm / 0.988 in 2.6 kg5.63 lbs357.78 mm / 14.1 in 278.63 mm / 11 in 25.95 mm / 1.022 in 2.6 kg5.78 lbs358 mm / 14.1 in 262 mm / 10.3 in 23.9 mm / 0.941 in 2.4 kg5.26 lbs359.5 mm / 14.2 in 273 mm / 10.7 in 19.9 mm / 0.783 in 2.3 kg5.03 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity - The Titan features Thunderbolt 4

The Titan is equipped with three USB-A ports (2x USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1) as well as one USB-C port (Thunderbolt 4). The latter supports Power Delivery and DP Alt mode. It has a total of two video outputs (1x HDMI, 1x DP). An audio jack and an ethernet port (1 GBit/s) round out its total package.

The video outputs, network socket and power connection are all situated on the back of the device, so corresponding cables shouldn't get in your way during use. A positive is that there is a USB-A port on the left and right side of the laptop.

Left side: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), SD card reader
Left side: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), SD card reader
Right side: audio combo, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), slot for a Kensington lock
Right side: audio combo, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), slot for a Kensington lock
Back: power connection, Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DP Alt mode), HDMI 2.1, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Gigabit Ethernet
Back: power connection, Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DP Alt mode), HDMI 2.1, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Gigabit Ethernet

SD card reader

The SD card reader (reference card: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) isn't one of the fastest of its kind but it delivers solid data rates in the medium-fast range. Comparing this with the values of the Blade 16 (2024) proves that significantly higher transfer rates could be possible.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
171 (169.48min - 194.55max) MB/s +101%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 204, n=75, last 2 years)
104.4 MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
86 MB/s +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
85 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
20 MB/s -76%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
181.81 MB/s +104%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 261, n=74, last 2 years)
133.3 MB/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
89 MB/s 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
89 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
25.8 MB/s -71%

Communication

There are no surprises when it comes to its network options: Wired connections are handled by an established Gigabit Ethernet controller (RTL8168/8111, 1 GBit/s) from Realtek. Intel's WiFi 6E chip (AX211) delivers good to very good data rates under optimal conditions (no WiFi devices in the vicinity, short distance between laptop and server).

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1549 (752min - 1707max) MBit/s +46%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1337 (789min - 1521max) MBit/s +26%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=258)
1229 MBit/s +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1862, n=124, last 2 years)
1229 MBit/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1143 (930min - 1352max) MBit/s +8%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1058 (543min - 1423max) MBit/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
980 (886min - 1077max) MBit/s -7%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Realtek RTL8852BE
776 (487min - 929max) MBit/s -27%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1683 (1630min - 1706max) MBit/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1672 (1316min - 1721max) MBit/s +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1658 (1631min - 1690max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1477 (1386min - 1517max) MBit/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1741, n=124, last 2 years)
1416 MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=258)
1391 MBit/s -16%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Realtek RTL8852BE
978 (960min - 990max) MBit/s -41%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
957 (475min - 998max) MBit/s -42%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1040 (543-1423)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1550 (752-1707)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø776 (487-929)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø980 (886-1077)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1143 (930-1352)
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1336 (789-1521)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1658 (1631-1690)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1477 (1386-1517)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø978 (960-990)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø941 (475-998)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1671 (1316-1721)
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1683 (1630-1706)

Webcam

The webcam (2.1 MP) is a standard affair, including support for Windows Hello. The camera doesn't have a mechanical cover or a physical on/off switch.

ColorChecker
11.9 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro: 10.69 ∆E min: 3.37 - max: 20.32 ∆E

Accessories

Aside from the usual documents (quick-start guide and warranty information), no additional accessories are included with the laptop.

Maintenance

After removing all of the screws on the bottom of the case, the bottom case part can be removed with the help of a plectrum or flat spatula. Then you can access the memory banks (of which one is occupied), SSD (PCIe 4, M.2-2280), second SSD slot (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) WLAN module, BIOS battery, fans and the battery.

Hardware Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hardware Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hardware Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hardware Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hardware Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hardware Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hardware Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hardware Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hardware Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro

Sustainability

Lots of cardboard, little plastic: The laptop is enclosed in a film, while a thin foam mat protects the top of the device. The printed quick-start guide is in a plastic bag. A removable base plate makes repairs to the laptop possible—the entire hardware is accessible. Software updates shouldn't be a problem for the next few years—after all, Windows 11 is used as its operating system.

It remains to be seen how Nubia will handle the supply of spare parts and support for its own software. At the time of testing, there is still no download area for the Titan on the Nubia website.

Warranty

We cannot provide any information regarding the laptop's warranty—it is likely to be for around 12 months, which is standard in the United States. We consider extended warranties to be unlikely.

Input devices - The RedMagic laptop with RGB lighting

Keyboard

Nubia has gone for a chiclet keyboard including a numerical keypad. The evenly-lit keys feature a short travel and a clear pressure point. The keyboard doesn't yield when typing on it. A positive is that its offset arrow keys are full-sized. Its RGB backlighting is split into four zones, and our test device has a QWERTY keyboard layout. We can't say whether the manufacturer offers localized layouts.

Touchpad

A multi-touch clickpad (approx. 11.7 x 7.5 cm) with a glass surface serves as a mouse replacement. It has a short travel and a clear pressure point. The pad can be deactivated if required.

Keyboard Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Keyboard Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro

Display - An IPS panel with DCI-P3 coverage

It seems that the work-friendly 16:10 aspect ratio has established itself, as most laptops in the comparison field have screens with this aspect ratio—including the Titan. Nubia has equipped its laptop with a matte, viewing-angle-stable IPS display (2,560 x 1,600 pixels) with a diagonal of 16 inches. The panel is super bright and its contrast meets the target value. It is perfectly possible to read from the screen outdoors. A positive is that the 240-Hz panel shows no signs of PWM flickering and supports G-Sync. Alternative displays are not available.

Sub-pixels
Sub-pixels
Backlight bleeding
Backlight bleeding
Outdoors
Outdoors
Viewing angles
Viewing angles
542
cd/m²
540
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 545 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 515.7 cd/m² Minimum: 27 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 543 cd/m²
Contrast: 1065:1 (Black: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83, calibrated: 0.69
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
84.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.999
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
BOE NE160QDM-NZB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Chi Mei CMN163E, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1", 144 Hz
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Chi Mei N160GME-GTB, LED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
BOE NE160WUM-NX6, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 165 Hz
Display
2%
-48%
1%
-15%
-48%
Display P3 Coverage
96.3
99.22
3%
41.3
-57%
95.9
0%
68.8
-29%
41.8
-57%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.93
0%
61.7
-38%
99.8
0%
99.5
0%
62.4
-38%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
84.1
87.81
4%
42.7
-49%
86.4
3%
70.8
-16%
43.3
-49%
Response Times
-54%
-454%
-52%
-126%
-635%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
3.9 ?(1.7, 2.2)
4.8 ?(2.2, 2.6)
-23%
28.6 ?(13.3, 15.3)
-633%
5 ?(2.5, 2.5)
-28%
12.7 ?(6, 6.7)
-226%
40.5 ?(19, 21.5)
-938%
Response Time Black / White *
5 ?(1.2, 3.8)
9.2 ?(4.6, 4.6)
-84%
18.7 ?(9.6, 9.1)
-274%
8.8 ?(4.7, 4.1)
-76%
6.3 ?(2.5, 3.8)
-26%
21.6 ?(11.1, 10.5)
-332%
PWM Frequency
Screen
4%
-74%
18%
-2%
-68%
Brightness middle
543
518
-5%
287
-47%
521
-4%
416
-23%
353
-35%
Brightness
516
491
-5%
288
-44%
506
-2%
392
-24%
318
-38%
Brightness Distribution
86
90
5%
86
0%
85
-1%
86
0%
81
-6%
Black Level *
0.51
0.36
29%
0.19
63%
0.44
14%
0.38
25%
0.21
59%
Contrast
1065
1439
35%
1511
42%
1184
11%
1095
3%
1681
58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.19
4.32
-35%
5.46
-71%
1.74
45%
2.33
27%
5.21
-63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.09
6.37
10%
20.36
-187%
3.88
45%
6.07
14%
19.95
-181%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.69
0.75
-9%
3.52
-410%
0.52
25%
1.02
-48%
3.61
-423%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.2
3.66
13%
4.8
-14%
3
29%
3.7
12%
3.6
14%
Gamma
1.999 110%
2.19 100%
2.108 104%
2.164 102%
2.161 102%
2.367 93%
CCT
7431 87%
6841 95%
6442 101%
6816 95%
7102 92%
7138 91%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-16% / -4%
-192% / -123%
-11% / 4%
-48% / -22%
-250% / -145%

* ... smaller is better

The panel covers the sRGB and DCI-P3 color spaces completely or nearly completely, but not the AdobeRGB space—this is similar to the screens of most competitors. Its decent color reproduction straight out of the box can be increased into the very good range by performing a calibration: Then, its color deviation drops from 3.19 to 0.69 (target: DeltaE < 3). At the same time, its grayscale depiction looks much more balanced.

Our color profile can be downloaded and used free of charge. A link can be found in the info box of the display.

CalMAN: grayscale
CalMAN: grayscale
CalMAN: color saturation
CalMAN: color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro vs sRGB
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro vs sRGB
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro vs AdobeRGB
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro vs AdobeRGB
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro vs DCI-P3
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro vs DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 3.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.7 ms rise
↘ 2.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8356 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

100 % brightness
100 % brightness
75 % brightness
75 % brightness
50 % brightness
50 % brightness
25 % brightness
25 % brightness
0 % brightness
0 % brightness

Performance - Raptor Lake and Ada Lovelace power the laptop

The Titan 16 Pro is aimed at gamers and creators, whereby its focus probably lies on the former. A Core i9-14900HX and a GeForce RTX 4060 power the laptop. Its MRSP is US$1,699. Nubia offers additional variants of this device, but they can't yet be found globally.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia system info
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Testing conditions

Three manufacturer-specific performance profiles (see table) are available to choose from. Balanced mode (benchmarks) and office mode (battery tests) were used during our test. The GPU mode was set to dynamic (= Optimus). Each profile can be called up directly via a separate key in the top row of the numeric keypad. Alternatively, you can change them via the Goper application (control center of the laptop).

Direct profile selection via buttons. The button symbols likely represent the rotation speed of the fan.
Direct profile selection via buttons. The button symbols likely represent the rotation speed of the fan.
Balanced mode Gaming mode Office mode
Power Limit 1 (HWInfo) 45 watts 100 watts 35 watts
Power Limit 2 (HWInfo) 140 watts 140 watts 140 watts
Noise (Cyberpunk 2077) 50 dB(A) 53 dB(A) 47 dB(A)
Performance (Cyberpunk 2077) 66 fps 66 fps 60 fps
Goper
Goper
Goper

Processor

The Titan only has one CPU option available, namely the Core i9-14900HX (Raptor Lake). Its 24 CPU cores (8P + 16E = 32 threads) reach maximum clock rates of 5.8 GHz (P) and 4.1 GHz (E). Continuous multi-thread load (CB15 loop) caused the CPU clock to drop significantly from the first to the third run. After that, a fairly constant level was maintained. The gaming mode profile ensures a significantly higher performance level.

The three power modes deliver very similar single-thread performance at around the same level as the CPU's average. Its multi-thread performance differs to a much greater extent: Only gaming mode resulted in values at the level of the CPU's average during our test, whereas the other two modes were significantly lower.

More information on the Core i9 can be found in our analysis article.

Multi-thread (connected to mains)
Multi-thread (connected to mains)
Single-thread (connected to mains)
Single-thread (connected to mains)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0230460690920115013801610184020702300253027602990322034503680391041404370Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2240 (2071.36-3453.93)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø3774 (3668.72-4136.93)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø2658 (2509.88-3812.18)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø3274 (3212.59-3455.14)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3394 (3129.4-4350.66)
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Core i7-13650HX: Ø2018 (1801.23-2863.69)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro Intel Core i9-14900HX; Gaming Mode: Ø3831 (3628.12-4559.96)
CB15 Loop (balanced mode)
CB15 Loop (balanced mode)
CB15 Loop (gaming mode)
CB15 Loop (gaming mode)
CB15 Loop (office mode)
CB15 Loop (office mode)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
85.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
82.5 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
81.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
80.8 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
78.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.4 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
70.6 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
66.3 pt
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
62.8 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=37)
28851 Points +69%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
28122 Points +65%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
28122 Points +65%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28075 Points +64%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
23887 Points +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 40970, n=147, last 2 years)
23700 Points +39%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
23207 Points +36%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
18879 Points +11%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17078 Points
Single Core
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2165 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2245, n=37)
2149 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2128 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
2104 Points -3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2103 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2049 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2267, n=147, last 2 years)
1942 Points -10%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
1813 Points -16%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
1702 Points -21%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
11396 Points +73%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=37)
10970 Points +67%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
10498 Points +60%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10474 Points +59%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
9244 Points +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 16108, n=147, last 2 years)
9135 Points +39%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
8361 Points +27%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
7197 Points +9%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6579 Points
CPU (Single Core)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
826 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=37)
824 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
818 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
813 Points -2%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
803 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
789 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 870, n=147, last 2 years)
748 Points -9%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
700 Points -15%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
651 Points -21%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
4560 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=38)
4427 Points +28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4350 Points +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
4137 (3668.72min - 4136.93max) Points +20%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
3812 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1537 - 6271, n=147, last 2 years)
3685 Points +7%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
3455 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3454 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
2864 Points -17%
CPU Single 64Bit
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
314 Points
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
310 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 323, n=37)
305 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
300 Points -4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
294 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 343, n=145, last 2 years)
287 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
281 Points -11%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
256 Points -18%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
238 Points -24%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
226 Seconds * -10%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
206 Seconds *
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
173 Seconds * +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (80 - 517, n=144, last 2 years)
161.2 Seconds * +22%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
140 Seconds * +32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
130 Seconds * +37%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
129 Seconds * +37%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
126 Seconds * +39%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=37)
121.2 Seconds * +41%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=37)
111239 MIPS +67%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
104730 MIPS +57%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
104193 MIPS +56%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
93134 MIPS +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 148086, n=145, last 2 years)
88344 MIPS +32%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
84900 MIPS +27%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
84799 MIPS +27%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
73927 MIPS +11%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
66769 MIPS
7z b 4 -mmt1
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7161 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7545, n=37)
7021 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
6979 MIPS -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6914 MIPS -3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
6890 MIPS -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7573, n=145, last 2 years)
6368 MIPS -11%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
5828 MIPS -19%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
5747 MIPS -20%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
5641 MIPS -21%
Geekbench 6.4
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
17562 Points +33%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=37)
17321 Points +32%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
17292 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
17086 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 22104, n=141, last 2 years)
15136 Points +15%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
14807 Points +13%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Gaming Mode)
14434 Points +10%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX (6.2.1)
13554 Points +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
13158 Points
Single-Core
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3036 Points
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Gaming Mode)
3031 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
2975 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=37)
2967 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
2884 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2764 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3219, n=141, last 2 years)
2738 Points -10%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX (6.2.1)
2505 Points -17%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
2378 Points -22%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
19597 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=37)
19449 Points +36%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18749 Points +31%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
18225 Points +28%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
16732 Points +17%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
16612 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 27010, n=144, last 2 years)
15988 Points +12%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
14270 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
13434 Points -6%
Single-Core
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2160 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2133 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2131 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
2117 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=37)
2092 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2423, n=144, last 2 years)
1969 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1941 Points -10%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
1810 Points -16%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
1700 Points -21%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
29.4 fps +75%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=37)
29.3 fps +74%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
27.4 fps +63%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
26.5 fps +58%
Average of class Gaming
  (7.7 - 44.3, n=145, last 2 years)
25.7 fps +53%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
24.6 fps +46%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
22 fps +31%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
18.9 fps +13%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
16.8 fps
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.3.4.2)
55.3 s * -63%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.3.4.2)
52.3 s * -54%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 96.6, n=143, last 2 years)
47.6 s * -40%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
46.4 s * -36%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (19 - 85.1, n=37)
42.6 s * -25%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.3.4.2)
42.5 s * -25%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2, Gaming Mode)
39.4 s * -16%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX (6.3.4.2)
38.9 s * -14%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
34 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
0.4896 sec * -32%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
0.4407 sec * -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3551 - 0.759, n=146, last 2 years)
0.4313 sec * -17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.409 sec * -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
0.4003 sec * -8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=37)
0.385 sec * -4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
0.3821 sec * -3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3699 sec *
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
0.3668 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3454 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
287 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
314 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
826 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6579 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2165 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17078 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
817 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
128.4 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
92.9 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
91.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
89.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
86.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.1 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67.2 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57.9 pt
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
55.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (7192 - 85542, n=144, last 2 years)
26222 KRay/s +100%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=36)
24763 KRay/s +89%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
24078 KRay/s +84%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
23676 KRay/s +81%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
21558 KRay/s +65%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
21393 KRay/s +63%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
16932 KRay/s +29%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13404 KRay/s +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13098 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=36)
124114 Points +84%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
121025 Points +79%
Average of class Gaming
  (35040 - 252486, n=144, last 2 years)
120817 Points +79%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
116556 Points +72%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
110279 Points +63%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
107531 Points +59%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
86338 Points +28%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
68241 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
67573 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
6137 MB/s +71%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=36)
6130 MB/s +71%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5615 MB/s +56%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5567 MB/s +55%
Average of class Gaming
  (1728 - 10389, n=144, last 2 years)
5509 MB/s +53%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5056 MB/s +41%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4008 MB/s +12%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
3589 MB/s
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
3127 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
152200 Points +23%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
150835 Points +22%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
139355 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=36)
138261 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
136489 Points +11%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
129836 Points +5%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
123488 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=144, last 2 years)
118022 Points -4%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
110589 Points -10%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
15467 Points +48%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=36)
15241 Points +45%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
14434 Points +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (5020 - 33636, n=144, last 2 years)
14064 Points +34%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13846 Points +32%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13605 Points +30%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
11704 Points +12%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
10475 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9134 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (17585 - 134044, n=144, last 2 years)
62000 Points +91%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=36)
61081 Points +88%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
59744 Points +84%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
58380 Points +79%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
54174 Points +66%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
52621 Points +62%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
42125 Points +29%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
33391 Points +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
32543 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
216070 MB/s +58%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=36)
139038 MB/s +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
136951 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
113157 MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=144, last 2 years)
110041 MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
107172 MB/s -22%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
98391 MB/s -28%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
82161 MB/s -40%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
64436 MB/s -53%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
1911 MB/s +81%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=36)
1791 MB/s +70%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1682 MB/s +60%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1643 MB/s +56%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1494 MB/s +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2531, n=144, last 2 years)
1462 MB/s +39%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1177 MB/s +12%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1136 MB/s +8%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1054 MB/s
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (3856 - 45446, n=144, last 2 years)
14079 KRay/s +107%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=36)
13332 KRay/s +96%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
12928 KRay/s +90%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
12778 KRay/s +88%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
11481 KRay/s +69%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
11438 KRay/s +68%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9029 KRay/s +33%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
7270 KRay/s +7%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
6809 KRay/s
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49671 MPixel/s +107%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
48831 MPixel/s +104%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=36)
46878 MPixel/s +96%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
46636 MPixel/s +95%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 62916, n=144, last 2 years)
41957 MPixel/s +75%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
39448 MPixel/s +65%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
36796 MPixel/s +54%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
23970 MPixel/s
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
23903 MPixel/s 0%

System performance

The smooth-running system provides enough power for demanding applications such as gaming, rendering and streaming. However, some of its computing power remains unused as the RAM (16 GB, DDR5-5600) only runs in single-channel mode—the laptop's low memory transfer rates compared to the competition confirmed this. Installing a second memory module (= dual-channel mode active) would provide a remedy to this.

The RAM runs in single-channel mode.
The RAM runs in single-channel mode.
PCMark 10 / Score
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
8302 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8278 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8166 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (7830 - 8322, n=2)
8076 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=131, last 2 years)
8016 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7830 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
7613 Points -3%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
7528 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
11708 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (11022 - 11413, n=2)
11218 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11087 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11022 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12600, n=131, last 2 years)
10779 Points -2%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
10778 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10725 Points -3%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
10333 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11014 Points +13%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
10273 Points +5%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
10204 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (9776 - 10558, n=2)
10167 Points +4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
9910 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=131, last 2 years)
9860 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9823 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9776 Points
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
14135 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (7440 - 19351, n=131, last 2 years)
13324 Points +10%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
12909 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (12091 - 12979, n=2)
12535 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
12511 Points +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
12091 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11359 Points -6%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
10841 Points -10%
CrossMark / Overall
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2235 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (2103 - 2184, n=2)
2144 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2132 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2103 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2067 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=112, last 2 years)
1958 Points -7%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1951 Points -7%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
1923 Points -9%
CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2093 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2042 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (2040 - 2042, n=2)
2041 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1973 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1911 Points -6%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1864 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2211, n=112, last 2 years)
1846 Points -10%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
1782 Points -13%
CrossMark / Creativity
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2455 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2399 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2371 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (2240 - 2472, n=2)
2356 Points +5%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2240 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2729, n=112, last 2 years)
2172 Points -3%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2107 Points -6%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2057 Points -8%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2053 Points +8%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1907 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1899 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1885 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1849 - 1899, n=2)
1874 Points -1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
1835 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1734 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=112, last 2 years)
1724 Points -9%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (329 - 339, n=2)
334 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
329 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
323 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
319 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (235 - 532, n=126, last 2 years)
312 Points -5%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
302 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
301 Points -9%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
276 Points -16%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (309 - 319, n=2)
314 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
309 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
307 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 341, n=113, last 2 years)
277 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
273 Points -12%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
260 Points -16%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
251 Points -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
542 ms * -23%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
511 ms * -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (397 - 674, n=136, last 2 years)
485 ms * -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
467 ms * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
461 ms * -5%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
447 ms * -2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
439 ms *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (430 - 439, n=2)
435 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7830 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78788 MB/s +82%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
78742 MB/s +82%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75827 MB/s +75%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=36)
75105 MB/s +74%
Average of class Gaming
  (21750 - 97515, n=144, last 2 years)
69448 MB/s +61%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
66599 MB/s +54%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
59896 MB/s +39%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
43236 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86175 MB/s +81%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85460 MB/s +80%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83034 MB/s +74%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87568, n=36)
81377 MB/s +71%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81049 MB/s +70%
Average of class Gaming
  (22956 - 104349, n=144, last 2 years)
72497 MB/s +52%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
68612 MB/s +44%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
47588 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
76689 MB/s +97%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73167 MB/s +88%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=36)
72406 MB/s +86%
Average of class Gaming
  (22297 - 133486, n=144, last 2 years)
71708 MB/s +84%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70034 MB/s +80%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65204 MB/s +67%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
60298 MB/s +55%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
39011 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=144, last 2 years)
99.4 ns * -25%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
96.4 ns * -21%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.1 ns * -14%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.4 ns * -13%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=36)
84.7 ns * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84 ns * -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
82.7 ns * -4%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
79.7 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

High latencies prevent video and audio editing in real-time. Future software updates could lead to improvements or even deteriorations.

Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2500.7 μs *
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2316.1 μs * +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1791.8 μs * +28%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1451.9 μs * +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
951.7 μs * +62%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
853.9 μs * +66%

* ... smaller is better

Storage devices

The PCIe 4 SSD (M.2-2280) from Samsung offers a storage capacity of 1 TB and delivers very good data rates. Positive: We observed no thermally induced throttling. The laptop has space for a second PCIe 4 SSD.

A PCIe 4 SSD serves as the system drive.
A PCIe 4 SSD serves as the system drive.
There is space for a second SSD.
There is space for a second SSD.
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7001 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5205 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 997.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 747.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4034 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3774 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 79.06 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 211.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
91.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
90.8 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
79.7 pt
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
78.2 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
72 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
71.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
70.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4104 (4091.75min - 4103.68max) MB/s +8%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3795 (3728.41min - 3794.55max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=88)
3766 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3497 (3441.46min - 3497.42max) MB/s -8%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3469 (3344.35min - 3469.11max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (281 - 8300, n=127, last 2 years)
3452 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2556 (2209.35min - 2555.51max) MB/s -33%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2366 (2263.79min - 2365.89max) MB/s -38%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4834 (4439.32min - 4834.12max) MB/s +33%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4659 (4410.1min - 4659.12max) MB/s +29%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4533 (4522.27min - 4532.95max) MB/s +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 9699, n=127, last 2 years)
3925 MB/s +8%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3895 (3747.67min - 3894.8max) MB/s +7%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3625 (3598.44min - 3624.51max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=88)
3581 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3403 (3360.48min - 3402.53max) MB/s -6%
seq q8 t1 read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
7058 (6624.24min - 7058.17max) MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7049 (5964.33min - 7049.37max) MB/s +6%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
6933 (6552.34min - 6933.16max) MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 15056, n=127, last 2 years)
6661 MB/s 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6654 (5651.22min - 6654.47max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6599 (5813.31min - 6598.9max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=88)
6483 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
5152 (4288.44min - 5152.1max) MB/s -23%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6896 (6883.77min - 6896.11max) MB/s +38%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
5265 (5223.42min - 5264.69max) MB/s +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1281 - 13519, n=127, last 2 years)
5239 MB/s +5%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4990 (4969.33min - 4989.54max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4934 (4925.79min - 4933.55max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=88)
4810 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4775 (4754.8min - 4775.22max) MB/s -4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
4392 (3922.93min - 4391.65max) MB/s -12%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
95.2 (94.25min - 95.19max) MB/s +44%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
84.4 (72.17min - 84.41max) MB/s +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.5 (78.06min - 80.5max) MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=88)
76.5 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.2 - 110.2, n=127, last 2 years)
67.7 MB/s +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
66.2 (61.1min - 66.24max) MB/s
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
56.2 (54.05min - 56.2max) MB/s -15%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
46.2 (45.32min - 46.24max) MB/s -30%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
298 (287.37min - 297.91max) MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
280 (277.46min - 279.66max) MB/s +16%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
270 (268.96min - 269.65max) MB/s +12%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
251 (249.24min - 250.87max) MB/s +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
251 (246.36min - 251.38max) MB/s +4%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
241 (231.88min - 240.59max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=127, last 2 years)
216 MB/s -10%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=88)
188.5 MB/s -22%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4915 (4891.5min - 4914.51max) MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4117 (4077.22min - 4117.27max) MB/s +8%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3822 (3797.23min - 3821.59max) MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3764 (3700.88min - 3763.72max) MB/s -2%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3330 (3310.23min - 3329.64max) MB/s -13%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3293 (2898.17min - 3292.73max) MB/s -14%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=88)
2586 MB/s -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 8067, n=127, last 2 years)
2554 MB/s -33%
4k q32 t16 write
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3717 (3584.28min - 3717.4max) MB/s +5%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3539 (3004.21min - 3539.13max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3534 (3522.28min - 3534.26max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3522 (3439.08min - 3521.99max) MB/s 0%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3074 (2966.78min - 3074.2max) MB/s -13%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2405 (937.07min - 2405.2max) MB/s -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 5653, n=127, last 2 years)
2097 MB/s -41%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=88)
1959 MB/s -45%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9122 Points +11%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
9056 Points +11%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8192 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
7807 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7769 Points -5%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
7423 Points -9%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=87)
6892 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (2319 - 13854, n=125, last 2 years)
6794 Points -17%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3590 Points +14%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3368 Points +7%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3136 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3051 Points -3%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3007 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2963 Points -6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=87)
2433 Points -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=125, last 2 years)
2384 Points -24%
Score Write
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4018 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3703 Points +5%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3524 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=87)
3284 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3262 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (989 - 7208, n=125, last 2 years)
3258 Points -8%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3191 Points -9%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2919 Points -17%
Seq Read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
5622.8 MB/s +10%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
5247.63 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5214.03 MB/s +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 9890, n=125, last 2 years)
5141 MB/s +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5097.01 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=87)
4901 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4212.96 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3027 MB/s -41%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5143.63 MB/s +39%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
4617.83 MB/s +25%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4482.43 MB/s +21%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4234.14 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (722 - 9926, n=125, last 2 years)
3911 MB/s +6%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3690.18 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3510 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 - 4526, n=87)
3334 MB/s -10%
4K Read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
84.56 MB/s +21%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
78.34 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
76.57 MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
75.4 MB/s +8%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 - 89.2, n=87)
72.4 MB/s +4%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
69.73 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=125, last 2 years)
66.7 MB/s -4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
51.41 MB/s -26%
4K Write
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
254.58 MB/s +25%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
231.38 MB/s +13%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
218.1 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
217 MB/s +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (75.6 - 512, n=125, last 2 years)
215 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
208.4 MB/s +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
204.43 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 - 246, n=87)
186 MB/s -9%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2991.57 MB/s +17%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2721.41 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2585 MB/s +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2556.31 MB/s
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2551.05 MB/s 0%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2430.71 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 - 2854, n=87)
1871 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3630, n=125, last 2 years)
1796 MB/s -30%
4K-64 Write
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3338.79 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2980.22 MB/s +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2950.72 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 - 3451, n=87)
2764 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2694 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (521 - 5909, n=125, last 2 years)
2656 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2512.87 MB/s -15%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2238.92 MB/s -24%
Access Time Read
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
0.137 ms * -163%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.067 ms * -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=125, last 2 years)
0.05761 ms * -11%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.052 ms *
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
0.038 ms * +27%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 - 0.083, n=86)
0.0377 ms * +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.032 ms * +38%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.032 ms * +38%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=125, last 2 years)
0.04746 ms * -126%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.017 - 0.101, n=87)
0.03431 ms * -63%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.02 ms * +5%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
0.019 ms * +10%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
0.019 ms * +10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.018 ms * +14%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.015 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6623 (5874.12-6660.14)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4251 (3284.07-6624.06)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5625 (4912.19-6954.3)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7013 (6198.53-7048.48)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6971 (4271.48-7056.44)
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5086 (4094.28-5122.29)

Graphics card

The GeForce RTX 4060 (3,072 shaders, 128-bit bus, 8 GB GDDR6) is currently a (lower) mid-range gaming GPU. Nubia grants it a maximum TGP of 140 watts—more isn't possible. Its benchmark results are slightly above the RTX-4060 average (balanced mode). Gaming mode doesn't result in an increase. Switching between dGPU and Optimus doesn't require a restart—Advanced Optimus is supported.

Steel Nomad (balanced mode, connected to mains)
Steel Nomad (balanced mode, connected to mains)
Steel Nomad (balanced mode, battery operation)
Steel Nomad (balanced mode, battery operation)
Steel Nomad (gaming mode, connected to mains)
Steel Nomad (gaming mode, connected to mains)
Steel Nomad (office mode, connected to mains)
Steel Nomad (office mode, connected to mains)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
92.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
88.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
78.2 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
76.8 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
76.6 pt
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
74.5 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
74.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
73.2 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (10741 - 76300, n=139, last 2 years)
46951 Points +28%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
44538 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
42753 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
36945 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
36596 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
36548 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
35409 Points -3%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
35045 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (28136 - 38912, n=57)
34860 Points -5%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (2913 - 62849, n=152, last 2 years)
33986 Points +28%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
31091 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
30687 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
27046 Points +2%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
26964 Points +1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
26844 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
26698 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
26573 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (20533 - 29656, n=54)
25780 Points -3%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (2295 - 25763, n=148, last 2 years)
14316 Points +35%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
12900 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
11959 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
10919 Points +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
10580 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
10575 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (7484 - 11451, n=56)
9943 Points -6%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
9937 Points -6%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
9841 Points -7%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
55770 points
3DMark 11 Performance
28427 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22307 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10789 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
2288 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
23 Seconds * -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (19 - 28, n=53)
22.9 Seconds * -4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * -0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds *
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Gaming Mode)
22 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
21 Seconds * +5%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (3.3.3)
20 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=139, last 2 years)
19.8 Seconds * +10%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
19 Seconds * +14%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
44 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (39 - 53, n=53)
43.2 Seconds * +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Gaming Mode)
43 Seconds * +2%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
41 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
41 Seconds * +7%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (3.3.3)
40 Seconds * +9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
34 Seconds * +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (15 - 110, n=139, last 2 years)
33.4 Seconds * +24%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
33 Seconds * +25%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (3.3.3)
401 Seconds * -2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
394 Seconds *
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
312 Seconds * +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (189 - 452, n=53)
309 Seconds * +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (122 - 962, n=145, last 2 years)
274 Seconds * +30%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
245 Seconds * +38%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
233 Seconds * +41%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Gaming Mode)
229 Seconds * +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
228 Seconds * +42%
Geekbench 6.4
GPU OpenCL
Average of class Gaming
  (21284 - 234266, n=137, last 2 years)
130410 Points +31%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
119119 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
117097 Points +18%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Gaming Mode)
99553 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
99373 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (6.2.1)
97899 Points -1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
96607 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (76525 - 100831, n=39)
92316 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
85278 Points -14%
GPU Vulkan
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
101006 Points +26%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Gaming Mode)
93870 Points +17%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (6.2.1)
92895 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (4454 - 231659, n=118, last 2 years)
89713 Points +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
89638 Points +12%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
88889 Points +11%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
80178 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
78486 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (15985 - 101001, n=32)
73402 Points -8%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 277970, n=143, last 2 years)
141971 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
127544 Points +14%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
113950 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
112238 Points
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
111296 Points -1%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
103588 Points -8%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
102604 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
101150 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (5039 - 112238, n=53)
99531 Points -11%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Average of class Gaming
  (9296 - 185888, n=110, last 2 years)
84302 Points +24%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
78642 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
78091 Points +15%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
67999 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
65791 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (28838 - 87612, n=31)
62653 Points -8%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
61926 Points -9%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
54630 Points -20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
51949 Points -24%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (556 - 4077, n=74, last 2 years)
2304 mpaths +34%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (5.0.1)
1805 mpaths +5%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (5.0.1)
1803 mpaths +5%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (5.0.1)
1782 mpaths +4%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Gaming Mode )
1738 mpaths +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1717 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1387 - 1817, n=28)
1711 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1690 mpaths -2%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (425 - 3288, n=75, last 2 years)
1679 mpaths +39%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (5.0.1)
1289 mpaths +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1244 mpaths +3%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (5.0.1)
1220 mpaths +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Gaming Mode )
1220 mpaths +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1209 mpaths
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (5.0.1)
1198 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (957 - 1294, n=29)
1170 mpaths -3%
CPU
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Gaming Mode )
18868 mpaths +62%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
16766 mpaths +44%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (5.0.1)
16168 mpaths +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (4081 - 30302, n=78, last 2 years)
15956 mpaths +37%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (5.0.1)
13952 mpaths +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (8364 - 21065, n=28)
12813 mpaths +10%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (5.0.1)
11935 mpaths +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
11638 mpaths
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1333, n=123, last 2 years)
775 mpaths +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (v4.10.07 )
673 mpaths +5%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (v4.10.07 )
649 mpaths +2%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (v4.10.07 )
648 mpaths +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
639 mpaths
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, Gaming Mode )
632 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (483 - 715, n=46)
632 mpaths -1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (v4.10.07 )
628 mpaths -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
599 mpaths -6%
CPU
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, Gaming Mode)
28574 ksamples +61%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (v4.10.07 )
27069 ksamples +52%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
26235 ksamples +48%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (v4.10.07 )
24305 ksamples +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (6122 - 45327, n=123, last 2 years)
23691 ksamples +33%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (v4.10.07 )
21499 ksamples +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (12680 - 32360, n=46)
19671 ksamples +11%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (v4.10.07 )
18304 ksamples +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
17771 ksamples

* ... smaller is better

Gaming performance

The Titan is designed for QHD gaming at high to maximum settings. The installed hardware generates frame rates slightly above the RTX 4060 average (balanced mode). Gaming mode results in a plus when running games that benefit from higher CPU performance—such as Dota 2 Reborn and X-Plane 11. Its graphics performance is otherwise identical.

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
91.5 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
87.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.3 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84.8 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
79.3 pt
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
75.2 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
74.4 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
73.7 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 166.5, n=118, last 2 years)
99.3 fps +33%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
83.3 (37.9min) fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.12)
82.5 (68.4min) fps +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2.12)
79.5 (66.7min) fps +6%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2.12, Gaming Mode)
74.9 (63.2min) fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2.12)
74.7 (62min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (56.4 - 93.1, n=31)
71.6 fps -4%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2.02)
69.7 (39min) fps -7%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2.02)
67.1 (20.8min) fps -10%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 212, n=142, last 2 years)
129.3 fps +23%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
122.1 fps +16%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
119.7 fps +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
106.1 fps +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
105.4 fps
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Gaming Mode )
104.8 fps -1%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
101.5 fps -4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
98.1 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (75.1 - 109.8, n=51)
97.4 fps -8%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 456, n=134, last 2 years)
248 fps +31%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
213 (26.4min, 161.7P1) fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
206 (37.8min, 155P1) fps +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
199.9 (40.2min, 143.4P1) fps +6%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Gaming Mode )
189.6 (50.2min, 139.1P1) fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
189.2 (10.3min, 139.1P1) fps
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
182.2 (56.5min, 132.3P1) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (135.3 - 210, n=50)
181.5 fps -4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
179 (76.4min, 130.3P1) fps -5%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
183.8 (158.1min) fps +25%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
181.7 (153.5min) fps +24%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (Gaming Mode)
167.4 (144.9min) fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
160.8 (136.5min) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 248, n=145, last 2 years)
152.4 fps +4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
149.7 (130.4min) fps +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
146.9 (123.2min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (115 - 183.8, n=53)
144.9 fps -1%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
142.4 (120.3min) fps -3%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (Gaming Mode)
140.3 fps +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
135.1 fps +15%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.3 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.5 fps +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
117.2 fps
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
107.1 fps -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.4 - 166.2, n=147, last 2 years)
104.3 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (60.7 - 141.1, n=54)
101.5 fps -13%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
100.3 fps -14%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (35.7 - 227, n=69, last 2 years)
126 fps +29%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.1 (67.5min, 84.5P0.1, 92.4P1) fps +22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.3 (32.4min, 76.7P0.1, 97.8P1) fps +18%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
97.5 (46.7min, 63.1P0.1, 79.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (68.7 - 110.7, n=18)
88 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
71.1 fps -27%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 246, n=84, last 2 years)
131.7 fps +36%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117 (72.8min, 80.4P0.1, 90.5P1) fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111.8 (87.2min, 87.8P0.1, 95.1P1) fps +16%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
96.5 (62.4min, 71.2P0.1, 81.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (66.5 - 105.5, n=19)
85.4 fps -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
66.5 fps -31%
Once Human
1920x1080 Very High Preset
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
94.2 (17.2min, 29.8P0.1, 57.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (88.7 - 94.2, n=2)
91.5 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.2 - 94.2, n=2, last 2 years)
54.2 fps -42%
2560x1440 Very High Preset
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
62.3 (16.9min, 24.7P0.1, 44.3P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (n=1last 2 years)
62.3 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (59.1 - 62.3, n=2)
60.7 fps -3%
2560x1440 Very High Preset + Quality FSR
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
76.5 (19.7min, 36P0.1, 53.1P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (n=1)
76.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (n=1last 2 years)
76.5 fps 0%
F1 24
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (54.1 - 157.8, n=40, last 2 years)
106.2 fps +81%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.4 (57min, 56P1) fps +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
60.6 (49min, 49P1) fps +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
58.8 (48min, 47P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (47.5 - 61.6, n=10)
56.7 fps -4%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (36.7 - 106.4, n=38, last 2 years)
73.9 fps +101%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
45.1 (36min, 36P1) fps +23%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
36.7 (30min, 30P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (24.3 - 38.8, n=6)
34.3 fps -7%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (59.2 - 159.3, n=28, last 2 years)
106.1 fps +79%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.8 (58min, 58P1) fps +21%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
59.2 (48min, 48P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (48.6 - 61, n=3)
56.3 fps -5%
Ghost of Tsushima
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73.7 (30min, 46.2P0.1, 55.4P1) fps +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (28.5 - 104.2, n=12, last 2 years)
68.5 fps +8%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
63.4 (33.6min, 39.6P0.1, 50.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (55.6 - 63.4, n=5)
60 fps -5%
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
56.1 (32min, 37.7P0.1, 43.8P1) fps +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (22.7 - 84.9, n=10, last 2 years)
53.8 fps +13%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
47.7 (30.7min, 33.5P0.1, 38P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (41.1 - 47.7, n=3)
44.3 fps -7%
2560x1440 Very High Preset + Quality DLSS
Average of class Gaming
  (60.2 - 105.2, n=8, last 2 years)
77.4 fps +22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74.2 (40.6min, 44.9P0.1, 57.2P1) fps +17%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
63.6 (32.3min, 35.9P0.1, 49.9P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (n=1)
63.6 fps 0%
Dragon's Dogma 2
1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (49.5 - 99.3, n=12, last 2 years)
70.7 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.4 (29.5min, 31P0.1, 35.9P1) fps +4%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67.7 (23.9min, 34P0.1, 45P1) fps
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
63.3 (25.6min, 34.9P0.1, 46.2P1) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (57.2 - 67.7, n=5)
62.3 fps -8%
2560x1440 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (34.6 - 93.4, n=9, last 2 years)
63.3 fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58.5 (31.3min, 34.1P0.1, 45.9P1) fps +11%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
52.9 (28.2min, 31P0.1, 42.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (45.8 - 52.9, n=2)
49.4 fps -7%
The First Descendant
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80 (53.7min, 54.9P0.1, 62.7P1) fps +15%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
69.4 (31.4min, 48.1P0.1, 56.5P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (67.6 - 69.4, n=3)
68.2 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.4 - 80, n=5, last 2 years)
62.2 fps -10%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
51.2 (34min, 38.1P0.1, 43.3P1) fps +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (43.7 - 51.2, n=3, last 2 years)
48.3 fps +11%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
43.7 (30.9min, 33.5P0.1, 36.1P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (43.5 - 43.7, n=2)
43.6 fps 0%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + DLSS Quality
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
51.8 (23.7min, 31.9P0.1, 40.2P1) fps +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (43.3 - 51.8, n=2, last 2 years)
47.6 fps +10%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
43.3 (21.5min, 25.2P0.1, 34.1P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (n=1)
43.3 fps 0%

Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty delivered slightly fluctuating frame rates at a fairly stable level during our 30-minute test (max. settings, FHD). We noted no noticeable drop in performance.

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø67.6 (60.1-69.2)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø68.5 (65-69.4)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø77.5 (72.5-79.1)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Gaming Mode: Ø68.2 (62.6-69.4)
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom (balanced mode)
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom (balanced mode)
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom (gaming mode)
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom (gaming mode)
lowmed.highultraQHD DLSSQHD FSRQHD
GTA V (2015) 186.1 184 177.7 118.4 89.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 206 170.9 160.2 146.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 199.7 146 105.4 76.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 167 142.8 117.2
Strange Brigade (2018) 480 277 219 189.2 126.9
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 140.3 110.8 97.5 96.5 65.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 121.4 101.1 86.2 74.7 46.9
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) 71.9 67.7 52.9
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) 91.3 86.8 78.2 63.4 63.6 47.7
F1 24 (2024) 243 225 175.8 58.8 59.2 36.7
The First Descendant (2024) 159 100.9 80.6 69.4 43.7
Once Human (2024) 164.8 132.9 108.3 94.2 76.5 62.3

Emissions - Too loud, too hot

Noise emissions

The Titan is by no means a quietly running laptop. Even in idle mode, the two fans are constantly audible. Cyberpunk caused the level to climb to a loud 50 dB(A) (balanced mode) or an even louder 53 dB(A) (gaming mode). Office mode resulted in an only slightly more moderate value of 47 dB(A). The fans are quieter in battery mode and occasionally stand still.

Noise Level

Idle
35 / 36 / 40 dB(A)
Load
49 / 52 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.739.342.838.636.22534.236.637.735353145.145.549.345.646.84032.830.832.431.931.85033.231.335.432.528.26333.524.232.423.730.38023.821.720.6182310021.626.720.916.724.512526.724.323.517.62816027.525.124.218.729.820030.727.526.621.731.425030.225.322.71732.731532.226.72314.134.540034.128.826.213.437.65003730.227.215.239.663035.829.726.212.938.180035.728.824.713.838.8100037.130.226.213.440.2125038.530.726.213.841160038.931.12713.441.8200037.629.124.113.440.4250037.82823.513.340.9315039.629.623.613.242.7400037.726.520.513.641.2500036.624.919.113.640.8630030.519.115.614.335800029.218.214.814.533.71000025.516.914.114.430.31250021.916.614.414.726.1160001916.213.514.120.4SPL48.940.335.926.152N6.53.42.30.88.2median 34.1median 26.7median 23.5median 14.1median 37.6Delta5.34.64.21.65.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseNubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
Noise
17%
13%
10%
5%
5%
off / environment *
26
23
12%
25
4%
25.2
3%
25
4%
26
-0%
Idle Minimum *
35
23
34%
28
20%
27.8
21%
28
20%
30
14%
Idle Average *
36
23
36%
29
19%
32
11%
31
14%
32
11%
Idle Maximum *
40
25
37%
33
17%
29.6
26%
35
12%
35
12%
Load Average *
49
45.18
8%
45
8%
45.2
8%
52
-6%
51
-4%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
50
52.69
-5%
53
-6%
Load Maximum *
52
53.13
-2%
48
8%
55.8
-7%
52
-0%
54
-4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43
51

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

The laptop heats up considerably under load: Cyberpunk 2077 and the stress test caused temperatures above 50 degrees Celsius at certain points. The palm rest's temperatures were sometimes almost too hot. We also noted values above the average in idle mode.

Max. Load
 48 °C
118 F
50 °C
122 F
48 °C
118 F
 
 46 °C
115 F
49 °C
120 F
48 °C
118 F
 
 40 °C
104 F
39 °C
102 F
38 °C
100 F
 
Maximum: 50 °C = 122 F
Average: 45.1 °C = 113 F
57 °C
135 F
58 °C
136 F
50 °C
122 F
53 °C
127 F
58 °C
136 F
41 °C
106 F
38 °C
100 F
37 °C
99 F
35 °C
95 F
Maximum: 58 °C = 136 F
Average: 47.4 °C = 117 F
Power Supply (max.)  49 °C = 120 F | Room Temperature 24 °C = 75 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Heat
-9%
13%
-3%
-13%
6%
Maximum Upper Side *
50
50
-0%
50
-0%
58
-16%
51
-2%
41
18%
Maximum Bottom *
58
57
2%
50
14%
45.2
22%
66
-14%
43
26%
Idle Upper Side *
31
36
-16%
25
19%
31.1
-0%
35
-13%
32
-3%
Idle Bottom *
32
39
-22%
26
19%
37.2
-16%
39
-22%
37
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test

The extreme stress test scenario (Prime95 and Furmark in continuous operation) checked the system's stability under full load. The CPU operated at high clock rates at the start of the test, but was then throttled to values below 2 GHz. The GPU worked at full power.

Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95

Speakers

The stereo speakers produce a pretty decent sound overall. The bass could do with being a little more pronounced.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.639.3253536.53145.643.24031.928.65032.531.16323.723.4801828.810016.74012517.650.916018.755.120021.758.62501763.631514.166.740013.470.550015.271.563012.974.380013.870.1100013.469125013.867.8160013.473.6200013.471.6250013.365.3315013.270.1400013.672.4500013.675.1630014.374.1800014.573.11000014.470.11250014.761.71600014.157.3SPL26.183.8N0.862.9median 14.1median 70.1Delta1.65.331.324.831.322.123.422.12628.22623.616.523.625.122.125.127.823.827.821.212.321.224.619.724.62814.92838.51138.543.216.543.249.414.749.454.812.454.85510.95558.19.258.161.87.861.866.48.766.469.48.669.468.1968.166.99.866.968.110.168.165.61165.663.811.263.860.811.760.85511.85562.81262.865.112.165.157.312.157.350.712.550.747.411.147.477.12377.138.70.438.7median 58.1median 11.2median 58.19.11.99.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNubia RedMagic Titan 16 ProLenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.13 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power management - The Titan 16 delivers mediocre runtimes

Power consumption

Its power consumption is normal for the hardware installed. Cyberpunk 2077 and the stress test were run with constant power consumption. The power supply (280 watts) is sufficient in size.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Idledarkmidlight 16 / 19 / 27 Watt
Load midlight 123 / 240 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
HP Victus 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-4%
16%
-23%
-35%
17%
21%
3%
Idle Minimum *
16
13.7
14%
9
44%
26.7
-67%
31
-94%
12
25%
11.5 ?(3 - 33, n=48)
28%
Idle Average *
19
17.7
7%
15
21%
24.4
-28%
33
-74%
13
32%
Idle Maximum *
27
18.5
31%
23
15%
32.7
-21%
41
-52%
27
-0%
20.3 ?(7.6 - 45, n=48)
25%
Load Average *
123
124
-1%
123
-0%
122.1
1%
114
7%
105
15%
92.9 ?(59 - 190, n=47)
24%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
174.2
224
-29%
196.8
-13%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
184.3
229
-24%
218
-18%
Load Maximum *
240
297
-24%
241
-0%
241
-0%
250
-4%
210
12%
210 ?(99 - 364, n=48)
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
143.7
190.6
167.8

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø190.2 (172.7-240)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.6 (15.8-27.1)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø184.3 (180.1-188.2)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø73.6 (69-117.5)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø86.2 (69.3-116.7)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø161.7 (154.7-170.4)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø20.8 (18.5-30.6)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø174.2 (169-179.5)

Runtimes

The 16-inch device achieved runtimes of 4:40 h during the WiFi test (accessing websites using a script) and 5:16 h during the video test (short film Big Buck Bunny (H.264 encoding, FHD) in a loop)—not great values. Some of its competitors run for significantly longer.

The battery has a capacity of 80 Wh.
The battery has a capacity of 80 Wh.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
8h 01min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 127)
4h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 16min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 16min
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80.1 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
HP Victus 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90.61 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
16%
83%
-16%
20%
69%
30%
Reader / Idle
481
356
-26%
H.264
316
312
-1%
242
-23%
WiFi v1.3
280
308
10%
511
83%
227
-19%
337
20%
474
69%
Load
76
105
38%
79
4%

Pros

+ bright QHD+ screen with a 16:10 aspect ratio (240 Hz, G-Sync, DCI-P3)
+ two SSD slots (PCIe 4, M.2-2280)
+ RAM can be swapped out/upgraded
+ aluminum case
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ Power Delivery

Cons

- high noise emissions
- gets quite hot
- disappointing runtimes
- RAM runs in single-channel mode
- case is susceptible to collecting fingerprint marks

Verdict - Room for improvement

The RedMagic Titan 16 Pro, test sample provided by Nubia.
The RedMagic Titan 16 Pro, test sample provided by Nubia.

Core i9-14900HX and a GeForce RTX 4060 ensure QHD gaming at high to maximum settings. The installed hardware isn't used to its full potential, as the RAM runs in single-channel mode. It's recommended that a second memory module be installed. 

Nubia's debut product does what it is designed to do: Bring games onto its screen smoothly. But the competition doesn't exactly need a reason to be afraid.

Its emission values are extremely disappointing: The laptop produces (too) much noise over the entire load range—plus, it heats up a lot. Its bright, true-color IPS screen (16-inch, 2,560 x 1,600 pixels, 240 Hz, G-Sync, DCI-P3) with a work-friendly 16:10 aspect ratio, on the other hand, left a good impression on us.

The laptop's battery life won't knock anyone's socks off. You would expect (slightly) more from a gaming laptop with an 80 Wh battery. At least its installed USB-C port (Thunderbolt 4) supports Power Delivery (and DP Alt mode). This means that you don't necessarily always have to carry the bulky proprietary power supply with you.

One fact that you should consider before purchasing the device: In contrast to established manufacturers such as Acer, Lenovo or HP, Nubia doesn't really have a presence globally. As a result, it isn't possible to estimate what the situation will be regarding spare parts supply, support and repairs.

Its price of US$1,699 certainly doesn't speak in favor of the laptop: For example, a nearly identical configuration of the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (with the exception of its RAM which is 32 GB instead of 16 GB) currently only costs US$1,350. Another alternative could be the XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24). The price for a comparable version of this device is about US$2,000 (with Windows 11) or US$1,950 (without Windows as an operating system).

Price and availability

The Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro is available from 08/29/2024 and can be purchased for US$1,699 via the RedMagic store.

Please note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.

Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro - 08/21/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
79 / 98 → 80%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 87%
Weight
61 / 10-68 → 87%
Battery
62 / 95 → 65%
Display
84%
Games Performance
83%
Application Performance
83%
AI Performance
95%
Temperature
76 / 95 → 80%
Noise
53 / 90 → 59%
Audio
87%
Camera
38 / 75 → 51%
Average
63%
81%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
79.3%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 39.4%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > RedMagic Titan 16 Pro review: A gaming laptop made by a smartphone manufacturer
Sascha Mölck, 2024-08-22 (Update: 2024-08-22)