Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i3-8100H vs Intel Core i7-9750H

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 16 cores consisting of 6 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5.4 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.5 GHz clock speed and two additional low power cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 45 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Enterprise. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card that offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.35 GHz.

Performance - High End

The top model offers all the cores that are built into the chip and clocks relatively high at up to 5.4 GHz. Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should reach the level of the old Raptor Lake Core Core 9 270H (6 + 8 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Chiplet Design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile from Intel using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also is produced at TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile are also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

Intel Core i3-8100H

► remove from comparison Intel i3-8100H

The Intel Core i3-8100H is a mid-range processor for laptops with four cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced mid 2018. The processor clocks at 3 GHz (no Turbo Boost) and can execute up to four threads simultaneously (no Hyper-Threading). According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i7-9750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9750H

The Intel Core i7-9750H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.5 GHz (4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i7-8750H, the 9750H offers improved clock rates and a larger L3 cache.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now max. eight cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to the Intel Core i9-8950HK, an expensive hexa-core processor of the previous generation. While performance gains over the outgoing 8th Gen H-class chips are unimpressive to say the least, the average Core i7-9750H in our database is much faster than the Ryzen 7 3750H and other H-class Ryzen chips AMD sells as of mid 2019.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of around 70 W, the Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 9750H that we know of. It can be 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz compared to the UHD 630 of the 8750H CPU. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to reduce slightly, 35 W being the lowest Intel-recommended value. Doing so would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The hexa-core Intel CPU is made with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for below average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 285HIntel Core i3-8100HIntel Core i7-9750H
CodenameArrow Lake-HCoffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H « 4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H « 3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H « 2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock4500 - 5400 MHz3000 MHz2600 - 4500 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB8 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 16
6 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
4 / 46 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt
Technology5 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C100 °C
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2350 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$651 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
SocketFCBGA1440BGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NILPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 285H
43.3 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9750H
29.9 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 127     avg: 127.3     median: 127 (71%)     max: 128 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 740     avg: 975     median: 991 (18%)     max: 1194 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16632     avg: 19718     median: 20442 (19%)     max: 22080 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2126     avg: 2141     median: 2133 (90%)     max: 2163 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 810     avg: 818     median: 817 (89%)     max: 827 Points
min: 416     avg: 442.5     median: 442 (48%)     max: 486 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6517     avg: 7563     median: 7920 (19%)     max: 8251 Points
min: 2017     avg: 2564     median: 2599 (6%)     max: 3133 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2797     avg: 3137     median: 3282 (21%)     max: 3333 Points
min: 952     avg: 1182     median: 1188 (7%)     max: 1306 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 313     avg: 315     median: 314 (87%)     max: 318 Points
min: 170     avg: 183.7     median: 185.5 (51%)     max: 194 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
40.3 Points (52%)
min: 11.26     avg: 13     median: 13.1 (17%)     max: 14.11 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (91%)
min: 1.96     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (50%)     max: 2.19 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11576 Points (70%)
min: 6659     avg: 6923     median: 6970 (42%)     max: 7214 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
84729 Points (61%)
min: 28251     avg: 33539     median: 34445 (25%)     max: 36304 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 37188     avg: 40129     median: 38960 (25%)     max: 44238 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 9069     avg: 9165     median: 9081 (11%)     max: 9346 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
238.3 s (3%)
154.4 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.1 s (1%)
4.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16732 Points (27%)
min: 6160     avg: 6396     median: 6395.5 (10%)     max: 6631 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 53335     avg: 61217     median: 60639 (35%)     max: 69676 MIPS
min: 28512     avg: 32357     median: 33303 (19%)     max: 35174 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5999     avg: 6091     median: 6136 (72%)     max: 6138 MIPS
min: 4580     avg: 4846     median: 4865 (57%)     max: 5090 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 69.6     avg: 70.3     median: 70.3 (23%)     max: 70.9 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 211     avg: 214.8     median: 214.8 (50%)     max: 218.6 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.8     avg: 22.8     median: 23.6 (41%)     max: 25.9 fps
min: 7.1     avg: 8.7     median: 8.8 (16%)     max: 10.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
min: 0.7     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (21%)     max: 0.75 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10 GB/s (26%)
min: 7.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.4 (19%)     max: 7.4 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 259     avg: 339     median: 341 (4%)     max: 417 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 159     avg: 197     median: 197 (1%)     max: 235 Seconds
min: 342.1     avg: 433.3     median: 435.2 (3%)     max: 494.9 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.427     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4343 sec
min: 0.608     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.695 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16618 Points (35%)
min: 9618     avg: 10722     median: 10791.5 (23%)     max: 11365 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
min: 8.3     avg: 8.5     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.96 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.7 s (1%)
min: 18.4     avg: 18.9     median: 18.5 (1%)     max: 20.09 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
389.3 s (2%)
min: 450.5     avg: 471.8     median: 467.3 (2%)     max: 502 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
88317 Points (68%)
min: 35262     avg: 41819     median: 42706.5 (33%)     max: 46599 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19102     avg: 22396     median: 23751 (58%)     max: 24334 Points
min: 9704     avg: 12766     median: 13028.5 (32%)     max: 14337 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
114747 Points (93%)
min: 15356     avg: 56549     median: 58809 (48%)     max: 60819 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
112438 Points (91%)
min: 53777     avg: 58538     median: 58661 (48%)     max: 61050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 56756     avg: 59035     median: 58584 (49%)     max: 61319 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 21867     avg: 22754     median: 22753.5 (58%)     max: 23640 Points
min: 8293     avg: 10689     median: 11022 (28%)     max: 11708 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27803     avg: 33475     median: 35281.5 (63%)     max: 35532 Points
min: 12438     avg: 16332     median: 16696.5 (30%)     max: 17788 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6727     avg: 11039     median: 12137 (51%)     max: 13154 Points
min: 4620     avg: 6334     median: 6463.5 (27%)     max: 7171 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2665     avg: 2878     median: 2912 (73%)     max: 3110 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 15330     avg: 16653     median: 17207 (67%)     max: 17992 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1982     avg: 2062     median: 2096 (82%)     max: 2108 Points
min: 1117     avg: 1190     median: 1204 (47%)     max: 1251 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14243     avg: 15562     median: 15818 (28%)     max: 16626 Points
min: 4859     avg: 5597     median: 5813 (10%)     max: 6262 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1105     avg: 1179     median: 1171 (5%)     max: 1248 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4812     avg: 5575     median: 5635 (18%)     max: 6230 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4440     avg: 5238     median: 5266 (53%)     max: 5511 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17054     avg: 22076     median: 22951 (23%)     max: 25043 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5377     avg: 5570     median: 5569.5 (62%)     max: 5762 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24370     avg: 24660     median: 24659.5 (36%)     max: 24949 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21185     avg: 22450     median: 22711.5 (40%)     max: 23587 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 4137     avg: 4243     median: 4252.5 (83%)     max: 4428 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 422     avg: 445.3     median: 450 (1%)     max: 464 ms
min: 0     avg: 1048     median: 1071 (1%)     max: 1713 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 82.6     avg: 84.3     median: 84.1 (1%)     max: 86.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 109360     avg: 115546     median: 115823 (88%)     max: 121454 Points
min: 22874     avg: 35814     median: 36178 (27%)     max: 39708 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 254     avg: 296.2     median: 311 (85%)     max: 323.6 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 280     avg: 323.7     median: 333 (60%)     max: 358 Points
min: 199     avg: 211.4     median: 208.5 (37%)     max: 231 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1812     avg: 2016     median: 2064 (77%)     max: 2173 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 53.2     avg: 84.8     median: 69.5 (12%)     max: 131.6 Watt
min: 61.4     avg: 75.5     median: 72.3 (12%)     max: 96 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 65.4     avg: 99.6     median: 102.8 (19%)     max: 130.5 Watt
min: 57.7     avg: 78.5     median: 80.5 (15%)     max: 95.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.61     avg: 13.8     median: 6.5 (4%)     max: 29.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.65     avg: 7.4     median: 6.4 (7%)     max: 10.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.5     avg: 33.4     median: 31.9 (24%)     max: 42.8 Points per Watt
min: 12.4     avg: 15.2     median: 15.3 (11%)     max: 17.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 285H → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9750H → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 07. 21:59:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18542 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10058 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11352 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751918363s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 07 Jul 2025 05:21:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18542 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 18542 +0.008s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10058 +0s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 10058 +0s ... 0.02s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11352 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#13 got single benchmarks 11352 +0.094s ... 0.118s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.07s ... 0.188s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.188s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)