Origin PC EVO16-S (Clevo P960RD) Review: A Rare 16.1-inch Gaming Laptop

Allen Ngo 👁, 08/14/2019

16-inch display. Ever wanted a gaming laptop but felt that a 17.3-inch display might be too big and a 15.6-inch display might be too small? Then this high-power 16.1-inch Origin PC EVO16-S should fit the bill.

Origin PC is a PC builder and reseller of high-performance desktops and laptops that typically target enthusiasts, professional workstation users, and gamers. The EVO16-S is Origin PC's ultra-thin gaming laptop based on the Clevo P960RD chassis but with additional customization options and paint jobs for a wider variety of possible colors not available on most other gaming laptops.

The most notable feature of the EVO16-S is its uncommon 16.1-inch display size to make the system a middle alternative to the sea of both 15.6-inch and 17.3-inch gaming laptops in the market. The EVO16-S competes directly with other ultra-thin gaming laptops like the MSI GS65/GS75, Asus Zephyrus GX701, Acer Predator Triton, Razer Blade 15 or Pro 17, and the Gigabyte Aero 15 or Aero 17.

SKUs range from Intel Core i7 only (i7-8750H or i7-9750H) with GeForce RTX graphics (2060, 2070 Max-Q, 2080 Max-Q), up to 32 GB of RAM, and up to three storage options. The 144 Hz 1080p FHD remains fixed across all configurations. Prices can be as low as $1800 to as high as $3000 USD depending on features.

Test device courtesy of Origin PC

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Case

The smooth matte aluminum chassis has a high quality feel with a relatively rigid base. It's stronger and less flexible than the MSI GS75 or GS65, but it's still not nearly as sound as the Razer Blade 15 or Blade Pro 17. Surfaces bend and creak slightly more than on the Razer especially when applying pressure on the outer lid or when twisting the base from its front two corners. The two small hinges also tend to creak when close to their maximum angle.

Despite having a larger footprint than most 15.6-inch gaming laptop because of the 16.1-inch screen size, the EVO16-S manages to weigh almost the same as the smaller Gigabyte Aero 15 or Razer Blade 15. It's thicker than these alternatives as well by just 2 mm at most.

Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks

under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1.000 USD/Euros

Best Displays, for University Students

Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤5-inch, Camera Smartphones Notebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 160 Euros

Surfaces are a lot better at hiding fingerprints than on the Razer Blade series. The stylized corners are similar to most Clevo systems

Lid opened to maximum (~140 degrees) angle

Outer lid can be configured into various colors and even user-submitted images for HD UV glass printing and laser etching

Added texture along the bottom of the display for visual variety

Eurocom Nightsky RX17 MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q

Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, 3.5 mm mic, USB 3.1 Type-A, SD reader, SIM reader (disabled), Gigabit Ethernet, Kensington Lock

Left: AC adapter, HDMI, DisplayPort, 2x USB 3.1 Type-C (1x w/ DisplayPort), USB 3.1 Type-A

SD Card Reader

The spring-loaded SD card reader offers average transfer rates of about 87 MB/s. Moving 1 GB worth of pictures from our UHS-II test card to desktop takes about 13 seconds compared to half that on the Dell XPS 15.

A fully inserted card will only protrude by about 1 to 2 mm for safe transporting.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	198.5 MB/s ∼100% +142%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	197 MB/s ∼99% +140%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	82 MB/s ∼41%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	27 MB/s ∼14% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	242 MB/s ∼100% +179%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	219.1 MB/s ∼91% +153%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	86.6 MB/s ∼36%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	27 MB/s ∼11% -69%

Communication

The Intel 9560 with integrated Bluetooth 5.0 is a common find on high-end laptops. Performance is similar to the Killer 1550 sans the gaming-centric features that are exclusive to the latter. We didn't experience any connectivity issues during our time with the unit.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	688 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	682 MBit/s ∼99% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Wireless-AC 9560	680 MBit/s ∼99% +5%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Wireless-AC 9560	650 MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	718 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Wireless-AC 9560	683 MBit/s ∼95% +3%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	668 MBit/s ∼93% 0%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Wireless-AC 9560	666 MBit/s ∼93%

Accessories

Origin PC goes all the way when it comes to the unboxing experience. Users have the option to receive a wooden crate instead of the usual cardboard box alongside other free extras like a wall poster, notebook sleeve, t-shirt, mouse pad, drivers DVD, and even a 32 GB USB drive pre-loaded with a factory restore image.

While the included accessories are nice, the DVD is a puzzling because the laptop does not integrate an optical drive. Simply including the contents of the DVD onto the USB drive instead would have been much more useful to the end user.

Optional wooden crate requires a big philips screwdriver to crack open

Cardboard box fits snugly and protected inside

T-shirt, 32 GB USB drive, manual, wipe, poster, and drivers disc

Maintenance

Unfortunately, end-user upgrades are not easy. The bottom panel is secured tightly to the base to make servicing more difficult than it should be.

Warranty

Origin PC offers 1 to 3 years of protection with free shipping and a 45-day "No Dead Pixel Guarantee" for its laptops. They also offer 24/7 technical support in the U.S. for the life of the product.

Input Devices

Keyboard

Key feedback and layout are most similar to the Schenker Slim 15 or Schenker XMG A517. Feedback and travel are both firmer and deeper, respectively, than the keys on the XPS 15. In return, clatter is slightly louder.

Perhaps the best characteristic of the keyboard is the similar key cap size of the QWERTY keys, Arrow keys, and NumPad keys for uniform feedback between all these keys. On most other laptops, the Arrow and/or NumPad keys would often be smaller than the main QWERTY keys for spongier feedback and a more cramped experience.

Touchpad

The trackpad is average in size (~10.8 x 6 cm) and similar in texture and glide to the trackpad of the Eurocom Nightsky RX17. Unlike most other laptops, the glass surface is completely smooth much like on a smartphone touchscreen. Glide is therefore uneven depending on movement speed with more resistance than usual. The atypical surface takes some getting used to..

The dedicated mouse keys are quiet when pressed with moderate feedback and travel. We find dragging and dropping to be much easier with mouse keys when compared to clickpads.

Users familiar with other ultra-thin Clevo laptops will feel right at home on the EVO16-S

Center of trackpad doubles as a fingerprint reader. Its ultra-smooth surface, however, is very different from most other laptops

keys with moderate feedback and travel and per-key RGB lighting

Full-size NumPad and Arrow keys - a rarity for a laptop

Display

As the first 16.1-inch laptop in our database, there are no other models we know of sporting the same Chi Mei N161HCA-GA1 IPS panel. This appears to be a mid-range to high-end panel that matches the color space and fast black-white response times of other 120/144 Hz panels from Chi Mei albeit with a slightly dimmer backlight and lower contrast ratio. The larger MSI GS75, for example, is about 30 percent brighter with almost twice the contrast ratio.

The display is slightly grainy as is common on many matte displays. Thus, glossy displays will still have the notable advantage in terms of sharpness at the cost of glare. Our test unit unfortunately exhibits moderate backlight bleeding along the edges and corners as shown below that will become noticeable during boot up or when watching videos with black borders.

No edge-to-edge glass or 4K UHD options for this uncommon 16.1-inch display

Bezels are narrow, but nowhere near as narrow as on the Dell XPS or Razer Blade


273.7 cd/m²	259.2 cd/m²	247.6 cd/m²
252.1 cd/m²	278 cd/m²	247.8 cd/m²
258.2 cd/m²	262.4 cd/m²	248.6 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Chi Mei CMN N161HCA-GA1

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 278 cd/m² Average: 258.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14.71 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 278 cd/m²
Contrast: 678:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.93 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 1.49
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
93.2% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.17

ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q Chi Mei CMN N161HCA-GA1, IPS, 16.1, 1920x1080	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 15.6, 1920x1080	MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080	Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080	Eurocom Nightsky RX17 BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Response Times		-1%	-10%	15%	29%	-39%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14.4 (7.6, 6.8)	12.8 (6.8, 6) 11%	15.2 (7.6, 7.6) -6%	7.2 (3.8, 3.4) 50%	7.2 (3.8, 3.4) 50%	16.4 (8.4, 8) -14%
Response Time Black / White *	9.6 (5.2, 4.4)	10.4 (6, 4.4) -8%	11.2 (6.8, 4.4) -17%	10 (5.2, 4.8) -4%	8.8 (4.4, 4.4) 8%	10.4 (6, 4.4) -8%
PWM Frequency	25510 (21)	23810 (10) -7%	23580 (24) -8%	25510 (17) 0%		990.1 (99) -96%
Screen		23%	12%	36%	9%	2%
Brightness middle	278	293 5%	266 -4%	366 32%	286 3%	298.4 7%
Brightness	259	270 4%	248 -4%	343 32%	275 6%	287 11%
Brightness Distribution	89	87 -2%	89 0%	91 2%	90 1%	90 1%
Black Level *	0.41	0.29 29%	0.31 24%	0.29 29%	0.37 10%	0.3 27%
Contrast	678	1010 49%	858 27%	1262 86%	773 14%	995 47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	2.93	1.69 42%	2.78 5%	1.51 48%	2.19 25%	3.58 -22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	7.12	3.37 53%	5.96 16%	3.22 55%	4.4 38%	6.29 12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	1.49	1.24 17%	0.91 39%	0.71 52%	2.27 -52%	2.82 -89%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.5	2.3 49%	3.58 20%	1.93 57%	2.2 51%	3.1 31%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.3 ^96%	2.46 ^89%	2.38 ^92%	2.41 ^91%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	5767 ^113%	6758 ^96%	7186 ^90%	6881 ^94%	6405 ^101%	7064 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59.2	63 6%	62 5%	60 1%	59 0%	60.2 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93.2	98.5 6%	96 3%	94 1%	91 -2%	92.7 -1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		11% / 18%	1% / 7%	26% / 32%	19% / 12%	-19% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Color space is about the same as most other 144 Hz IPS panels at around 95 percent of sRGB. This is indicative of a high-end panel with both deep colors and a fast native refresh rate unlike the Panda LM156LF-CL03 panel on the cheaper Asus Zephyrus G GA502.

Further measurements with an X-Rite colorimeter reveal just average grayscale and color accuracy out of the box. Color temperature is also too warm, but a calibration addresses this and improves accuracy noticeably. Average grayscale and color DeltaE values sit at just 1.9 and 1.14 after calibration.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.6 ms rise
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

25510 Hz

≤ 21 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25510 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 21 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9428 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is only average at best since the backlight is dimmer than most Ultrabooks. Colors and texts become washed out very easily from the bright ambient lighting. Viewing angles are wide with slight changes to contrast and colors from extreme angles as is typical of IPS displays.

Performance

The EVO16-S ships with only Coffee Lake-H Core i7 and GeForce RTX graphics for now to cater directly to enthusiasts. LatencyMon shows no DPC latency issues even when the wireless is enabled.

Nvidia G-Sync is not available since Optimus comes standard.

Processor

CPU performance is essentially the same as the Core i7-8750H for all intents and purposes as detailed here. Nonetheless, raw performance is still 40 to 60 percent faster than the Core i5-9300H or older Core i7-7700HQ since the i7-9750H offfers a higher core count.

When running CineBench R15 Multi-Thread in a loop, performance dips by about 11 percent after the first loop not unlike many other gaming laptops with Core i7 Coffee Lake-H CPUs. The graph below shows that some older Core i7-8750H laptops can still outperform the Core i7-9750H by the slightest of margins after accounting for throttling.

See our dedicated page on the Core i7-9750H for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1101 (1094.42-1236.44)

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1066 (1058.57-1172.68)

Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)

HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1077 (1065.56-1205.55)

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.0x | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C Intel Core i7-8700K	192 Points ∼88% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.9 GHz, Vega 20) Intel Core i9-8950HK	192 Points ∼88% +2%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	189 Points ∼87% 0%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H	189 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (171 - 194, n=33)	183 Points ∼84% -3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 Intel Core i7-9750H	174 Points ∼80% -8%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL Intel Core i5-8300H	171 Points ∼78% -10%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	171 Points ∼78% -10%
Dell G7 17 7790 Intel Core i7-8750H	164 Points ∼75% -13%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	156 Points ∼72% -17%
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	144 Points ∼66% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	1721 Points ∼39% +44%
Eurocom Sky X4C Intel Core i7-8700K	1359 Points ∼31% +14%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 Intel Core i7-9750H	1306 Points ∼30% +9%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H	1197 Points ∼27%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (1010 - 1306, n=35)	1185 Points ∼27% -1%
Dell G7 17 7790 Intel Core i7-8750H	1183 Points ∼27% -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.9 GHz, Vega 20) Intel Core i9-8950HK	1051 Points ∼24% -12%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL Intel Core i5-8300H	805 Points ∼18% -33%
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	805 Points ∼18% -33%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	769 Points ∼18% -36%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	733 Points ∼17% -39%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C Intel Core i7-8700K	2.16 Points ∼89% +1%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H	2.14 Points ∼88%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	2.11 Points ∼86% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (1.96 - 2.19, n=6)	2.07 Points ∼85% -3%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.83 Points ∼75% -14%
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	1.64 Points ∼67% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	18.94 Points ∼57% +40%
Eurocom Sky X4C Intel Core i7-8700K	14.98 Points ∼45% +11%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H	13.53 Points ∼40%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (11.3 - 14.1, n=6)	13.1 Points ∼39% -3%
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	9.21 Points ∼28% -32%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.17 Points ∼24% -40%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C Intel Core i7-8700K	7243 Points ∼67%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	6967 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=8)	6912 Points ∼64%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	6539 Points ∼60%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5939 Points ∼55%
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	4770 Points ∼44%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	42456 Points ∼85%
Eurocom Sky X4C Intel Core i7-8700K	38810 Points ∼78%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (29665 - 36158, n=8)	33990 Points ∼68%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	24623 Points ∼50%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	21978 Points ∼44%
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	20687 Points ∼42%

wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL Intel Core i5-8300H	278.469 s * ∼3%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	231.67 s * ∼3%
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	197.075 s * ∼2%
Eurocom Sky X4C Intel Core i7-8700K	120.923 s * ∼1%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	118.733 s * ∼1%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (0.3 - 11327, n=18)	3683 Seconds * ∼16%
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	649.703 Seconds * ∼3%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	590.45 Seconds * ∼3%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL Intel Core i5-8300H	545.627 Seconds * ∼2%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	476.493 Seconds * ∼2%
Eurocom Sky X4C Intel Core i7-8700K	465.128 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

80 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

13.53 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.14 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

127.19 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1197 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

189 Points

Help

... in comparison

System Performance

PCMark benchmarks are in the same ballpark as other gaming laptops equipped with GeForce RTX graphics. We didn't experience any software or hardware hitches during our time with the test unit.

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8419 Points ∼75% +14%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	7353 Points ∼66%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (7090 - 7353, n=5)	7246 Points ∼65% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7236 Points ∼65% -2%
Dell G7 17 7790 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G	6565 Points ∼59% -11%
Productivity
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8416 Points ∼87% +7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	8200 Points ∼85% +4%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	7858 Points ∼81%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (7482 - 8200, n=5)	7764 Points ∼80% -1%
Dell G7 17 7790 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G	6783 Points ∼70% -14%
Essentials
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	9788 Points ∼89%
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9608 Points ∼87% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (9109 - 9788, n=5)	9450 Points ∼86% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	9109 Points ∼83% -7%
Dell G7 17 7790 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G	8967 Points ∼82% -8%
Score
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6306 Points ∼81% +6%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5928 Points ∼76%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5839 Points ∼75% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (5725 - 5928, n=5)	5806 Points ∼75% -2%
Dell G7 17 7790 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G	5279 Points ∼68% -11%

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6004 Points ∼92% +2%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5906 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (5672 - 5906, n=5)	5759 Points ∼88% -2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5749 Points ∼88% -3%
Dell G7 17 7790 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G	5315 Points ∼82% -10%
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4550 Points ∼75% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (4380 - 4461, n=5)	4421 Points ∼73% +1%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	4398 Points ∼72%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4380 Points ∼72% 0%
Dell G7 17 7790 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G	4010 Points ∼66% -9%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4398 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5906 points
Help

Storage Devices

Three internal storage bays are available in the form of 2x M.2 PCIe and 1x 2.5-inch SATA III (7 mm only). Origin PC offers multiple combinations and we recommend choosing carefully since end-user upgrades can be difficult.

Our specific test unit comes configured with a 500 GB Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus M.2 NVMe SSD and a secondary 2 TB Seagate ST2000LX001. Samsung offers some of the fastest consumer SSDs and this model is no different with sequential write rates approaching 2800 MB/s according to AS SSD. This particular drive is a common option on Clevo systems as most larger OEMs tend to use slower solutions from Intel or Toshiba instead.

	Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL WDC WD Green PC SSD WDS240G2G0B	Asus FX503VM-EH73 SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
AS SSD		-21%	-36%	-385%	-119%
Copy Game MB/s	1434.42	976.6 -32%	1140.57 -20%
Copy Program MB/s	569.99	496.53 -13%	454.24 -20%
Copy ISO MB/s	2728.01	2082.66 -24%	2085.95 -24%
Score Total	5169	4221 -18%	2870 -44%	162 -97%	798 -85%
Score Write	2853	2102 -26%	1141 -60%	69 -98%	178 -94%
Score Read	1506	1394 -7%	1186 -21%	65 -96%	411 -73%
Access Time Write *	0.026	0.034 -31%	0.065 -150%	0.582 -2138%	0.09 -246%
Access Time Read *	0.038	0.05 -32%	0.042 -11%	0.52 -1268%	0.17 -347%
4K-64 Write	2431.29	1807.21 -26%	921.88 -62%	17.82 -99%	95.53 -96%
4K-64 Read	1234.15	1159.06 -6%	875.61 -29%	7.25 -99%	343.35 -72%
4K Write	145.78	108.34 -26%	126.51 -13%	15.68 -89%	46.48 -68%
4K Read	54.56	52.08 -5%	59.11 8%	6.81 -88%	20.44 -63%
Seq Write	2759.62	1864.07 -32%	923.81 -67%	353.04 -87%	328.42 -88%
Seq Read	2172.43	1832.18 -16%	2516.94 16%	507.05 -77%	476.33 -78%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3536 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3242 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 624.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 556.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2559 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2718 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.22 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 197.3 MB/s

GPU Performance

The RTX 2080 Max-Q is performing where we expect it to be when compared to the average RTX 2080 Max-Q in our database. 3DMark results are very similar to the mobile RTX 2070 "Max-P" in the Asus Zephyrus GX502GW despite consuming slightly less power. A desktop RTX 2080 is still about 35 to 40 percent faster than the RTX 2080 Max-Q.

Performance benefits over Pascal GPUs like the GTX 1080 become greater when playing DX12 titles since Turing has been optimized for DX12.

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H	5538 Points ∼82% +18%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H	4685 Points ∼69%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H	4545 Points ∼67% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (3698 - 5148, n=13)	4356 Points ∼65% -7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H	4323 Points ∼64% -8%
Dell G7 17 7790 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H	3621 Points ∼54% -23%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H	3597 Points ∼53% -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X	11294 Points ∼79% +39%
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H	9754 Points ∼69% +20%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H	8153 Points ∼57%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H	8000 Points ∼56% -2%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H	7923 Points ∼56% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (6464 - 8844, n=13)	7763 Points ∼55% -5%
Dell G7 17 7790 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H	6695 Points ∼47% -18%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H	6586 Points ∼46% -19%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H	5043 Points ∼35% -38%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ	3572 Points ∼25% -56%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H	3565 Points ∼25% -56%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	2805 Points ∼20% -66%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X	27620 Points ∼68% +35%
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H	24623 Points ∼61% +20%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H	21138 Points ∼52% +3%
Eurocom Sky X4C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K	20909 Points ∼51% +2%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H	20466 Points ∼50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (18048 - 23032, n=13)	20314 Points ∼50% -1%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H	20119 Points ∼50% -2%
Dell G7 17 7790 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H	17466 Points ∼43% -15%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H	16647 Points ∼41% -19%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H	13188 Points ∼32% -36%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ	11483 Points ∼28% -44%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9537 Points ∼23% -53%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H	9536 Points ∼23% -53%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H	6112 Points ∼15% -70%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H	16523 Points ∼73% +40%
Eurocom Sky X4C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K	13928 Points ∼62% +18%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X	13644 Points ∼60% +15%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H	12785 Points ∼57% +8%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H	12512 Points ∼55% +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H	12176 Points ∼54% +3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H	12175 Points ∼54% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (10893 - 12785, n=14)	11856 Points ∼52% 0%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H	11829 Points ∼52%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9459 Points ∼42% -20%
Dell G7 17 7790 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H	9107 Points ∼40% -23%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ	7696 Points ∼34% -35%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H	7595 Points ∼34% -36%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X	37989 Points ∼75% +37%
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H	34050 Points ∼67% +23%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H	27732 Points ∼54%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (23386 - 30910, n=14)	27388 Points ∼54% -1%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H	27204 Points ∼53% -2%
Eurocom Sky X4C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K	26912 Points ∼53% -3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H	26752 Points ∼52% -4%
Dell G7 17 7790 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H	22523 Points ∼44% -19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H	22299 Points ∼44% -20%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H	17457 Points ∼34% -37%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ	14550 Points ∼29% -48%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H	13447 Points ∼26% -52%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	12193 Points ∼24% -56%

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark 11 Performance		21603 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		34287 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		17335 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		7907 points
Help

... in comparison

Gaming Performance

All titles will run at 60 FPS since the display is a "low" native resolution of 1080p. To fully exploit the 144 Hz refresh rate, however, you may want to consider dropping the graphics settings to low-medium or medium on most titles. Idling on Witcher 3 shows no recurring frame drops to suggest no interrupting background activity when gaming.

See our dedicated page on the GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q for more technical information and benchmarks.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)	110 fps ∼100% +17%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)	109 fps ∼99% +16%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	94 fps ∼85%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)	87 fps ∼79% -7%
Alienware m15 P79F Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	84 fps ∼76% -11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)	81 fps ∼74% -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (71 - 94, n=5)	80.4 fps ∼73% -14%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	64 fps ∼58% -32%
Asus G752VY Intel Core i7-6700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M	39 (min: 31) fps ∼35% -59%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.9 GHz, Vega 20) Intel Core i9-8950HK, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20	35 fps ∼32% -63%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Toshiba Satellite W30Dt-A-100 (min) A4-1200, Radeon HD 8180	33
...
MSI WS75 9TL-636 9750H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)	1194
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	1196
Lenovo Legion Y7000P-1060 8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	1196
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q 9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	1197
Asus Strix GL504GM 8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	1203
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW 8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)	1204
Asus ROG G703GX 8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)	1212
...
(max) 2970WX, RX Vega 64	4376

3DMark 11 in comparison
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS (min) 8550U, GeForce MX130	28
...
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG 9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	21390
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)	21509
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q 9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	21563
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q 9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	21603
Asus G701VIK-BA049T 7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)	21727
Alienware m17 P37E 8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	21837
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX 8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	21874
...
Eurocom Sky X9C (max) 8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop)	30042

Origin PC EVO16-S (Clevo P960RD) Review: A Rare 16.1-inch Gaming Laptop

Case

Connectivity

SD Card Reader

Communication

Accessories

Maintenance

Warranty

Input Devices

Keyboard

Touchpad

Display

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Performance

Processor

System Performance

Storage Devices

GPU Performance

Gaming Performance