Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H vs Intel Core i7-10875H vs Intel Core i7-10750H

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

► remove from comparison AMD R5 4600H

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600H is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4600H integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads).

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics adapter with 6 CUs and up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4600H in our database matches the Intel Core i7-10875H and even the Core i9-10885H, both significantly more costly chips, in multi-thread performance, giving this Ryzen an outrageously high price-to-performance ratio.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 5 chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 35 W and 54 W with clock speed and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, a high-performance cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The 7 nm TSMC process this APU is built with makes for better-than-average, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-10875H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10875H

The Intel Core i7-10875H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.3 and 5.1 GHz (4.3 with all 8 cores, 4.9 without Thermal Velocity boost) and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessors, the Comet Lake-H series CPUs offer only increased clock rates.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i7-10875H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP. 

Performance

The performance of the Core i7-10875H should be somewhere around the older Core i9-9880H. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i7-10750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10750H

The Intel Core i7-10750H is a fast 45 W processor designed for use in larger, beefier laptops. The Comet Lake-H family CPU was launched in mid-2020. It features six cores (twelve threads) running at 2.6 GHz Boosting up to 5 GHz (single-core Boost). The likely all-core Boost frequency is 4.3 GHz. Most of the specs are the same as the 10750H’s direct predecessor, the i7-9750H. The newer model has two advantages over its predecessor in that its Boost frequency is higher and the memory controller can now officially host memory clocked at 2,933 MHz, an upgrade over the 2,666 MHz limitation of the outgoing model.

Architecture

Comet Lake is a yet another revision of the dated Skylake architecture (not unlike the previous Coffee Lake, Whiskey Lake, Kaby Lake families) for similar feature set and performance-per-MHz figures. Core i7-10750H is manufactured on the third-gen 14 nm Intel process that is undeniably inferior to TSMC's 7 nm process, the one AMD’s Ryzen 4000 series laptop-grade processors are manufactured on.

The hexa-core CPU is compatible with up to 128 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2933 RAM and has support for PCI-Express 3.0 and Thunderbolt 3 but not the professional features (vPro, TXT, SIPP) as found in the case of Core i7-10850H.

Both the CPU cores and the iGPU have access to 12 MB of L3 cache. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

The 10750H gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1440 socket interface) and is thus pretty much impossible to replace.

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most similar to the Core i5-10500H, the Core i5-11400H and also the Ryzen 7 4700U. While perhaps not the best bang for the buck, the i7 is fast enough for any task, gaming included, as of late 2021.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 75 W, the ThinkPad P15 Gen 1-20ST000DGE is among the fastest laptops built around the 10750H that we know of. It can be about 80% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

We've known the Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU for a while. This is the same iGPU the Core i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H processors had. In this i7, the 24 EU iGPU is clocked at 350 MHz to 1,150 MHz.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 will let you connect up to 3 monitors with resolutions of up to 4096x2304@60. The built-in video decoder will happily handle AVC, HEVC, VP9 and other popular video codecs (AV1 is not supported though). This is not a gaming GPU as it is not fast enough to handle most AAA titles released in 2020. At 720p, Escape from Tarkov runs at just 17 fps (low quality preset), to give you an example. As the iGPU has no VRAM of its own, it is paramount that it is mated to fast system RAM.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to subpar, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

The Core i7-10750H has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W; laptop makers are free to reduce the value somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit, allowing for leaner designs at the cost of performance. Either way, a quality cooling solution is a must.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 4600HIntel Core i7-10875HIntel Core i7-10750H
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameRenoir-H (Zen 2)Comet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H « 3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H « 2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H « 2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3000 - 4000 MHz2300 - 5100 MHz2600 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 166 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP6FCBGA1440BGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-2933, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
$450 U.S.$435 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 4600H
32.4 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10875H
35.6 pt (49%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10750H
34 pt (47%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
69 Points (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
499 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7713     avg: 8161     median: 8072 (7%)     max: 8786 Points
min: 5135     avg: 8108     median: 8889.5 (8%)     max: 9809 Points
min: 4807     avg: 7129     median: 7463.5 (7%)     max: 8585 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1134     avg: 1145     median: 1142.5 (49%)     max: 1161 Points
min: 1100     avg: 1222     median: 1241.5 (53%)     max: 1270 Points
min: 1136     avg: 1218     median: 1217 (52%)     max: 1271 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 428     avg: 445.3     median: 449.5 (50%)     max: 454 Points
min: 430     avg: 485.9     median: 483.5 (54%)     max: 524 Points
min: 431     avg: 472.7     median: 472 (52%)     max: 504 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3055     avg: 3233     median: 3229.5 (8%)     max: 3393 Points
min: 1986     avg: 3455     median: 3391.5 (8%)     max: 4176 Points
min: 1749     avg: 2848     median: 2941 (7%)     max: 3325 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1398     avg: 1428     median: 1425 (9%)     max: 1467 Points
min: 1003     avg: 1554     median: 1594.5 (10%)     max: 1833 Points
min: 804     avg: 1263     median: 1303.5 (8%)     max: 1418 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 172.1     avg: 176.5     median: 176 (53%)     max: 179 Points
min: 190     avg: 203.6     median: 202 (61%)     max: 220 Points
min: 184     avg: 196.7     median: 197 (59%)     max: 213 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
16.3 Points (21%)
18.7 Points (24%)
min: 13.71     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (18%)     max: 14.13 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (51%)
2.4 Points (60%)
min: 2.17     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (55%)     max: 2.22 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5365 Points (32%)
7803 Points (47%)
min: 7275     avg: 7377     median: 7376.5 (45%)     max: 7478 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
32756 Points (24%)
44805 Points (32%)
min: 37009     avg: 37154     median: 37154 (27%)     max: 37299 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
142.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4380 Points (7%)
7473 Points (12%)
min: 6265     avg: 6287     median: 6287 (10%)     max: 6309 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 36693     avg: 37768     median: 37642.5 (22%)     max: 38873 MIPS
min: 29844     avg: 43117     median: 44947 (26%)     max: 49562 MIPS
min: 26040     avg: 33946     median: 35346 (20%)     max: 37345 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4334     avg: 4395     median: 4397 (53%)     max: 4471 MIPS
min: 5071     avg: 5360     median: 5319 (64%)     max: 5780 MIPS
min: 4504     avg: 5114     median: 5120 (61%)     max: 5470 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
82.9 fps (29%)
103 fps (36%)
min: 77.4     avg: 78.3     median: 78.3 (27%)     max: 79.2 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
197 fps (45%)
242.4 fps (56%)
min: 220.9     avg: 221.2     median: 221.2 (51%)     max: 221.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.27     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (17%)     max: 10.4 fps
min: 7.27     avg: 11.7     median: 12.1 (21%)     max: 14.1 fps
min: 5.54     avg: 9.6     median: 9.9 (17%)     max: 11.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
1.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.767     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.78 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
1.3 GB/s (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
10.3 GB/s (27%)
7.6 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
631 Seconds (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 337.2     avg: 351.9     median: 352 (2%)     max: 369 Seconds
min: 258.6     avg: 327     median: 322.5 (2%)     max: 535 Seconds
min: 322     avg: 389.1     median: 371 (3%)     max: 587 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.607     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.627 sec
min: 0.546     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.662 sec
min: 0.578     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.708 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12228     avg: 12945     median: 12944.5 (28%)     max: 13661 Points
min: 10847     avg: 11405     median: 11307 (24%)     max: 12061 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.5 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
8.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.1 s (1%)
16.8 s (1%)
17.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
607 s (3%)
431.7 s (2%)
466.6 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 55236     avg: 55318     median: 55317.5 (48%)     max: 55399 Points
43210 Points (38%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10904     avg: 11680     median: 11593.5 (31%)     max: 12640 Points
min: 11778     avg: 16439     median: 16622 (45%)     max: 18773 Points
min: 8587     avg: 12991     median: 13325 (36%)     max: 14993 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63367 Points (51%)
61445 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
60119 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 61439     avg: 63513     median: 63779 (54%)     max: 65322 Points
min: 60620     avg: 65215     median: 65828 (55%)     max: 67661 Points
min: 63803     avg: 65556     median: 65498 (55%)     max: 67904 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10548     avg: 11100     median: 11085.5 (28%)     max: 11681 Points
min: 8202     avg: 14143     median: 15133 (38%)     max: 16966 Points
min: 6797     avg: 10850     median: 11135 (28%)     max: 12015 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17769     avg: 18050     median: 18021.5 (32%)     max: 18378 Points
min: 15535     avg: 20404     median: 21228 (38%)     max: 22530 Points
min: 11653     avg: 17163     median: 17628.5 (31%)     max: 18769 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5496     avg: 6170     median: 6251 (26%)     max: 6792 Points
min: 5192     avg: 8699     median: 8946 (38%)     max: 10140 Points
min: 4911     avg: 6649     median: 6852 (29%)     max: 7543 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1525 Points (41%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
6631 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1099     avg: 1115     median: 1117 (47%)     max: 1124 Points
min: 1233     avg: 1304     median: 1300 (55%)     max: 1371 Points
min: 1114     avg: 1263     median: 1270 (54%)     max: 1333 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5260     avg: 6057     median: 6080 (11%)     max: 6574 Points
min: 5715     avg: 7734     median: 7799 (14%)     max: 8620 Points
min: 4443     avg: 6135     median: 6308 (11%)     max: 6674 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1188     avg: 1255     median: 1264 (5%)     max: 1306 Points
min: 1215     avg: 1258     median: 1253 (5%)     max: 1325 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6700     avg: 7399     median: 7370 (23%)     max: 8130 Points
min: 5710     avg: 6283     median: 6338.5 (20%)     max: 6632 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4964 Points (50%)
min: 5616     avg: 5830     median: 5803 (58%)     max: 6016 Points
min: 5321     avg: 5572     median: 5600.5 (56%)     max: 5832 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25247 Points (28%)
min: 28711     avg: 30765     median: 31346 (34%)     max: 31934 Points
min: 22859     avg: 24682     median: 24897 (27%)     max: 25637 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4605 Points (63%)
6013 Points (82%)
5640 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
20939 Points (51%)
30783 Points (75%)
24958 Points (61%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
min: 19061     avg: 19077     median: 19077 (100%)     max: 19093 Points
min: 13808     avg: 15156     median: 15155.5 (79%)     max: 16503 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 844     avg: 849     median: 848.5 (1%)     max: 855 ms
min: 746     avg: 765     median: 757 (1%)     max: 848 ms
min: 764     avg: 783     median: 779 (1%)     max: 840 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 46066     avg: 47138     median: 47137.5 (42%)     max: 48209 Points
min: 5561     avg: 46043     median: 53724.5 (48%)     max: 55732 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 198     avg: 206     median: 207 (43%)     max: 212 Points
min: 212     avg: 238.5     median: 239 (50%)     max: 262 Points
min: 202     avg: 225.2     median: 225 (47%)     max: 239 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1061 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
66.4 Watt (11%)
min: 69     avg: 98.9     median: 104.8 (18%)     max: 117 Watt
min: 70.9     avg: 93.4     median: 95 (16%)     max: 123 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
66.4 Watt (12%)
min: 71     avg: 110.8     median: 117 (21%)     max: 138 Watt
min: 78.5     avg: 103.7     median: 97.1 (18%)     max: 128 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
21.1 Points per Watt (16%)
min: 13.2     avg: 14     median: 13.6 (10%)     max: 15.6 Points per Watt
min: 9.96     avg: 12.8     median: 13.7 (10%)     max: 15.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4600H → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10875H → 123% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10750H → 107% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 16. 01:46:18

#0 checking url part for id 11679 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11949 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11708 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.049s ... 0.05s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11679 +0.021s ... 0.072s

#8 got single benchmarks 11679 +0.047s ... 0.119s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11949 +0.021s ... 0.14s

#10 got single benchmarks 11949 +0.123s ... 0.263s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11708 +0.021s ... 0.284s

#12 got single benchmarks 11708 +0.279s ... 0.562s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.562s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.745s ... 1.308s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.308s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)