Notebookcheck

MSI GP65 10SFK Laptop Review: 10th Gen Intel Core i7 Leaves its Mark

Intel 10th Gen Power. MSI has beaten most other OEMs to market with laptops sporting Intel's latest Comet Lake-H processors. After having checked out the Core i5-10300H and Core i9-10980HK, let's see how the Core i7-10750H fits in the lineup.

MSI announced their first batch of gaming laptops earlier this month shipping with Intel 10th gen Comet Lake-H processors. We've already tested the refreshed MSI GF75 10SCXR and brand new MSI GS66 10SFS since then with more to come in the near future.

The latest model we have today is the GP65 10SFK to replace last year's GP65 9SE. Aside from the differences in CPU, GPU, and display panel, however, the chassis remains identical year-over-year. We recommend checking out our existing review on the GP65 9SE as many of our comments apply here as well.

The GP65 competes directly with other mid-range 15.6-inch gaming laptops like the Asus TUF FX505, HP Omen 15, Aorus 15, and the Lenovo Legion Y540. Our specific configuration with the Core i7-10750H CPU, GeForce RTX 2070 GPU, and 144 Hz FHD display can be found online for about $1500 USD.

More MSI reviews:

MSI GP65 10SFK-047US (GP65 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8192 MB, Core: 1260 MHz, Memory: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 445.87, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, Apacer DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3, IPS, LGD0625, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM470
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
, Secondary: Seagate ST2000LM007
Soundcard
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio, Card Reader: SD reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27.5 x 357.7 x 248 ( = 1.08 x 14.08 x 9.76 in)
Battery
51 Wh Lithium-Ion, 6-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 2 W, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Dragon Center 2.0, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.322 kg ( = 81.91 oz / 5.12 pounds), Power Supply: 729 g ( = 25.71 oz / 1.61 pounds)
Price
1500 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
05/2020
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.3 kg27.5 mm15.6"1920x1080
82 %
10/2019
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.4 kg25 mm15.6"1920x1080
80 %
07/2019
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.2 kg26.8 mm15.6"1920x1080
86 %
06/2019
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.4 kg25 mm15.6"1920x1080
86 %
06/2019
Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2.1 kg24.4 mm15.6"1920x1080
383 mm / 15.1 inch 260 mm / 10.2 inch 29 mm / 1.142 inch 2.5 kg5.4 lbs360.4 mm / 14.2 inch 262 mm / 10.3 inch 26.8 mm / 1.055 inch 2.2 kg4.92 lbs361 mm / 14.2 inch 246 mm / 9.69 inch 24.4 mm / 0.961 inch 2.1 kg4.69 lbs357.7 mm / 14.1 inch 248 mm / 9.76 inch 27.5 mm / 1.083 inch 2.3 kg5.12 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 275 mm / 10.8 inch 25 mm / 0.984 inch 2.4 kg5.35 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 263 mm / 10.4 inch 25 mm / 0.984 inch 2.4 kg5.25 lbs

SD Card Reader

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.4 MB/s ∼100% +186%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.4 MB/s ∼35%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
 
24.96 MB/s ∼32% -9%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.84 MB/s ∼25% -28%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.3 MB/s ∼100% +167%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
31.92 MB/s ∼37%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
 
29.14 MB/s ∼34% -9%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
18.73 MB/s ∼22% -41%

Communication

The Intel AX201 now comes standard for 802.11ax or Wi-Fi 6 connectivity whereas last year's model came with Wi-Fi 5. We experienced no issues when connected to our Netgear RAX200 test router.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1379 (858min - 1529max) MBit/s ∼100% +5%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1320 MBit/s ∼96% 0%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1314 (949min - 1439max) MBit/s ∼95%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1295 (1184min - 1487max) MBit/s ∼94% -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1242 (1133min - 1283max) MBit/s ∼90% -5%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1645 (1401min - 1773max) MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1434 (736min - 1523max) MBit/s ∼87% 0%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1427 (808min - 1646max) MBit/s ∼87%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1330 MBit/s ∼81% -7%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1030 (722min - 1235max) MBit/s ∼63% -28%

Webcam

ColorChecker
1.9 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI GP65 10SFK-047US: 4.6 ∆E min: 1.93 - max: 10.21 ∆E

Maintenance

The bottom panel is secured by several Philips screws including one that is under a warranty seal sticker. Removing the panel can be tricky since the latches around the edges and corners are finicky and difficult to detach. Once inside, users will have access to two storage bays and two SODIMM slots. Note that the second M.2 2280 slot adjacent to the SODIMM slots is removed on the GP65 series.

MSI GP65 10SFK
MSI GP65 10SFK

Accessories and Warranty

There are no extras in the box other than the usual paperwork and AC adapter. The standard one-year limited warranty applies with additional protection available if purchased from CUKUSA.

Display

The LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3 IPS panel on our MSI is the first to appear in our database. A similar LP156WFG-SPB2 panel can be found on the Aorus 15 with nearly the same characteristics including the native 144 Hz refresh rate, fast black-white and gray-gray response times, and relatively wide color space.

The panel on our MSI is notably brighter than average for its category at 390 nits. In comparison, other gaming laptops like the Asus Strix Scar III or Dell Alienware m15 tend to top out at 300 nits. The main drawback to the panel is its average contrast ratio of about 600:1 whereas the panels on pricier gaming laptops like on the GS65 are closer to 1000:1.

No 4K UHD or OLED options for the 10th gen GP65 at the moment
No 4K UHD or OLED options for the 10th gen GP65 at the moment
Very narrow bezels help to reduce weight and overall size
Very narrow bezels help to reduce weight and overall size
Matte subpixel array. There is a minor level of graininess not unlike most other matte panels
Matte subpixel array. There is a minor level of graininess not unlike most other matte panels
Minor-moderate uneven backlight bleeding along the corners
Minor-moderate uneven backlight bleeding along the corners
350.5
cd/m²
361.9
cd/m²
370.9
cd/m²
336.7
cd/m²
384.9
cd/m²
366.3
cd/m²
339.7
cd/m²
360.8
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 384.9 cd/m² Average: 358.4 cd/m² Minimum: 19.19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 384.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 574:1 (Black: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 2.03
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6
93.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
LG Philips LGD0625, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
CMN N156HGE-EAL, TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
11%
-10%
-161%
-14%
-174%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
10.4 (6.4, 4)
9.6 (6, 3.6)
8%
15 (8, 7)
-44%
30.4 (14, 16.4)
-192%
14 (7, 7)
-35%
34.4 (22.4, 12.4)
-231%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (6.8, 5.2)
10.4 (6, 4.4)
13%
9 (5, 4)
25%
27.6 (17.6, 10)
-130%
11 (7, 4)
8%
26 (20, 6)
-117%
PWM Frequency
250 (20)
200 (99)
Screen
15%
-16%
-61%
2%
-104%
Brightness middle
384.9
348.3
-10%
309
-20%
286.2
-26%
316
-18%
265.7
-31%
Brightness
358
327
-9%
284
-21%
267
-25%
295
-18%
243
-32%
Brightness Distribution
87
85
-2%
88
1%
84
-3%
84
-3%
87
0%
Black Level *
0.67
0.4
40%
0.42
37%
0.33
51%
0.42
37%
0.63
6%
Contrast
574
871
52%
736
28%
867
51%
752
31%
422
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.43
1.6
34%
3.99
-64%
5.45
-124%
2.7
-11%
9.6
-295%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.58
5.07
-11%
8.3
-81%
18.08
-295%
5.65
-23%
18.5
-304%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.03
1
51%
1.12
45%
4.47
-120%
1.58
22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
2.3
12%
5.43
-109%
5.3
-104%
2.35
10%
12.7
-388%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.203 100%
2.57 86%
2.1 105%
2.41 91%
2.01 109%
CCT
6981 93%
6707 97%
7767 84%
7679 85%
6904 94%
13654 48%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59.7
61
2%
63
6%
37.6
-37%
60
1%
76
27%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93.9
96
2%
97
3%
59.1
-37%
93
-1%
100
6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
13% / 14%
-13% / -15%
-111% / -76%
-6% / 0%
-139% / -115%

* ... smaller is better

Color space covers approximately 94 percent of sRGB and 60 percent of AdobeRGB to be smaller than the color space available on the older GP62 TN panel. However, the superior response times, refresh rate, viewing angles, and overall quality of the newer panel more than make up for the color deficit.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Measurements with an X-Rite colorimeter reveal a well-calibrated display out of the box. Calibrating the display even further ourselves would result in only marginal improvements across the board meaning end-users won't need to do anything else to get the most out of the display.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.4 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17507 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is still average for the category since gaming laptops are not designed to be used outside frequently. Most Ultrabooks have brighter displays to better mitigate glare and washed out colors. 

Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast change if viewing from extreme angles only
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast change if viewing from extreme angles only

Performance

 

Processor

Raw CPU performance is roughly 5 to 15 percent faster than the average Core i7-9750H laptop. Users upgrading from an older Core i7-8750H laptop will see more significant gains of about 11 to 27 percent. The relatively minor gen-to-gen gains are not unexpected since Comet Lake-H shares the same 14 nm silicon as Coffee Lake-H.

Performance sustainability is excellent nonetheless. Running CineBench R15 Multi-Thread in a loop results in a performance dip of only 4 percent over time.

See our dedicated page on the Core i7-10750H for more technical details and benchmark comparisons. The hexa-core Core i7-10750H is just one step down from the octa-core Core i7-10875H that's available on the Gigabyte Aero 15.

CineBench R10 32-bit
CineBench R10 32-bit
CineBench R11.5 64-bit
CineBench R11.5 64-bit
CineBench R15
CineBench R15
CineBench R20
CineBench R20
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630Tooltip
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1240 (1233.16-1291.57)
Maingear Vector 15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1181 (1168.74-1264.9)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1496 (1486.55-1622.78)
Dell G7 17 7790 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1081 (1056.8-1189.87)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) - CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4288 Points ∼100% +45%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
3795 Points ∼89% +28%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
3677 Points ∼86% +24%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
3505 Points ∼82% +18%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3431 Points ∼80% +16%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
2960 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (2017 - 3110, n=54)
2554 Points ∼60% -14%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
2333 Points ∼54% -21%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
1906 Points ∼44% -36%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
1737 Points ∼41% -41%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1633 Points ∼38% -45%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) - CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
499 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
495 Points ∼99% +7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
479 Points ∼96% +3%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
474 Points ∼95% +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
463 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (416 - 486, n=54)
442 Points ∼89% -5%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
437 Points ∼88% -6%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
418 Points ∼84% -10%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
416 Points ∼83% -10%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
403 Points ∼81% -13%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
352 Points ∼71% -24%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit - CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
211 Points ∼100% +11%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
202 Points ∼96% +6%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
198 Points ∼94% +4%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H
193 Points ∼91% +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
193 Points ∼91% +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
190 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=80)
184 Points ∼87% -3%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
180 Points ∼85% -5%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
173 Points ∼82% -9%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points ∼81% -10%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
157 (155min - 159max) Points ∼74% -17%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
143 Points ∼68% -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit - CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1863 Points ∼100% +44%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1821 Points ∼98% +41%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1671 (1548.11min - 1671.4max) Points ∼90% +29%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
1623 Points ∼87% +26%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
1617 (1603min - 1630max) Points ∼87% +25%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
1292 (1233.16min - 1291.57max) Points ∼69%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H
1227 Points ∼66% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=83)
1180 Points ∼63% -9%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points ∼60% -14%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
839 (755.39min - 839.42max) Points ∼45% -35%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
797 Points ∼43% -38%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
734 Points ∼39% -43%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU - BMW27 CPU
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
555 Seconds * ∼100% -51%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
527 Seconds * ∼95% -44%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (374 - 495, n=19)
438 Seconds * ∼79% -19%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
367 Seconds * ∼66%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
317 Seconds * ∼57% +14%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
297 Seconds * ∼54% +19%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
290 Seconds * ∼52% +21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 - 7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
5413 MIPS ∼100% +9%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
5367 MIPS ∼99% +8%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
4954 MIPS ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4580 - 5090, n=19)
4853 MIPS ∼90% -2%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
4662 MIPS ∼86% -6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4634 MIPS ∼86% -6%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 - 7z b 4
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
48577 MIPS ∼100% +34%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
44829 MIPS ∼92% +23%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
43805 MIPS ∼90% +20%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
36370 MIPS ∼75%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28512 - 35174, n=19)
32232 MIPS ∼66% -11%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
22139 MIPS ∼46% -39%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1233 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
1206 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1117 - 1251, n=12)
1188 Points ∼96% -1%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
1143 Points ∼93% -5%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
874 Points ∼71% -28%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
7431 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
6604 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4859 - 6262, n=12)
5579 Points ∼75% -16%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
4032 Points ∼54% -39%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3537 Points ∼48% -46%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset - 4k Preset
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
12.348 fps ∼100% +20%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
12.193 fps ∼99% +18%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.1 fps ∼98% +17%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.3 fps ∼83%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (7.1 - 10.2, n=19)
8.64 fps ∼70% -16%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
6.34 fps ∼51% -38%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
86.6 s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
84.3 s ∼97% -3%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
58.9 s ∼68% -32%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (54.5 - 64.7, n=7)
58.8 s ∼68% -32%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean - Overall mean
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.676 sec * ∼100% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (0.608 - 0.695, n=12)
0.641 sec * ∼95% -3%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.623 sec * ∼92%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.556 sec * ∼82% +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
37009
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7275
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
13457
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
78.73 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
118 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1292 Points
Help

System Performance

Though the differences are minor, PCMark benchmarks are consistently higher than the 2019 GP65. Users upgrading from much older Core i5-7300HQ or i7-7700HQ gaming laptops like the GP62 will see more significant gains.

PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8088 Points ∼62%
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7570 Points ∼58% -6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7221 Points ∼56% -11%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
6999 Points ∼54% -13%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6631 Points ∼51% -18%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5282 Points ∼41% -35%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
5040 Points ∼39% -38%
Productivity
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8193 Points ∼79%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
8106 Points ∼78% -1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7507 Points ∼72% -8%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7328 Points ∼70% -11%
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7311 Points ∼70% -11%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
6713 Points ∼64% -18%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6518 Points ∼63% -20%
Essentials
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
10017 Points ∼87%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9859 Points ∼86% -2%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
9502 Points ∼83% -5%
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
9379 Points ∼82% -6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8912 Points ∼78% -11%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8355 Points ∼73% -17%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
7644 Points ∼67% -24%
Score
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6254 Points ∼77%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
5834 Points ∼72% -7%
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5761 Points ∼71% -8%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5625 Points ∼69% -10%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5609 Points ∼69% -10%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4732 Points ∼58% -24%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
4568 Points ∼56% -27%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5913 Points ∼87% 0%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5894 Points ∼86%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5857 Points ∼86% -1%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
5808 Points ∼85% -1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5697 Points ∼83% -3%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
5130 Points ∼75% -13%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4701 Points ∼69% -20%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5081 Points ∼83% +13%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5077 Points ∼83% +12%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4860 Points ∼80% +8%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4516 Points ∼74%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
4456 Points ∼73% -1%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
3928 Points ∼64% -13%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3917 Points ∼64% -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4516 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5894 points
PCMark 10 Score
6254 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues when opening multiple browser tabs. Thankfully, 4k video playback is smooth with no dropped frames.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1171.9 μs * ∼100%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

Our test unit comes with a 1 TB Samsung SSD PM981 and a secondary 2 TB Seagate ST2000LM007 HDD. The drive is only 5400 RPM, but the fast NVMe SSD more than makes up for it. The Samsung PM981 is faster than the Intel 660p series or the Toshiba XG3 series commonly found on Ultrabooks and other gaming laptops.

See our table of SSDs and HDDs for more benchmark comparisons.

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
Secondary 2.5-inch SATA III bay
Secondary 2.5-inch SATA III bay
Primary M.2 2280 PCIe x4 slot
Primary M.2 2280 PCIe x4 slot
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
AS SSD
-79%
-46%
-19%
-49%
-94%
Copy Game MB/s
1613.89
755.35
-53%
866.7
-46%
442.81
-73%
581.52
-64%
Copy Program MB/s
727.67
452.76
-38%
444.49
-39%
326.34
-55%
309.51
-57%
Copy ISO MB/s
2926.74
1269.47
-57%
942.16
-68%
1128.09
-61%
992.71
-66%
Score Total
5482
1332
-76%
1717
-69%
3163
-42%
1829
-67%
1940
-65%
Score Write
2249
586
-74%
992
-56%
1642
-27%
600
-73%
400
-82%
Score Read
2126
489
-77%
472
-78%
1027
-52%
849
-60%
1036
-51%
Access Time Write *
0.091
0.046
49%
0.047
48%
0.032
65%
0.034
63%
0.223
-145%
Access Time Read *
0.042
0.24
-471%
0.065
-55%
0.059
-40%
0.079
-88%
0.231
-450%
4K-64 Write
1877.79
403.79
-78%
787.44
-58%
1370.77
-27%
428.18
-77%
246.8
-87%
4K-64 Read
1865.15
323.8
-83%
321.49
-83%
724.88
-61%
628.03
-66%
878.09
-53%
4K Write
128.97
90.1
-30%
115.48
-10%
113.48
-12%
112.04
-13%
80.34
-38%
4K Read
54.18
48.88
-10%
48.22
-11%
53.43
-1%
35.84
-34%
27.58
-49%
Seq Write
2418.17
919
-62%
888.5
-63%
1574.55
-35%
601
-75%
730.48
-70%
Seq Read
2065.9
1163
-44%
1019.04
-51%
2484.55
20%
1847.57
-11%
1307.09
-37%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-34%
-33%
-27%
-25%
-32%
Write 4K
145
133.3
-8%
137.5
-5%
50.19
-65%
158.4
9%
99.35
-31%
Read 4K
46.84
55.34
18%
56.96
22%
35.32
-25%
45.04
-4%
46.96
0%
Write Seq
2377
980.2
-59%
983.8
-59%
990.6
-58%
621.6
-74%
Read Seq
2185
1406
-36%
1564
-28%
1526
-30%
1592
-27%
Write 4K Q32T1
463.5
286.3
-38%
237.4
-49%
445.1
-4%
434.2
-6%
240.1
-48%
Read 4K Q32T1
526.5
331.5
-37%
340.7
-35%
526.2
0%
589.8
12%
580.9
10%
Write Seq Q32T1
2395
976.2
-59%
958.8
-60%
1647
-31%
630.4
-74%
686
-71%
Read Seq Q32T1
3470
1519.8
-56%
1732
-50%
3427
-1%
2108
-39%
1581.2
-54%
Write 4K Q8T8
747.6
268.1
Read 4K Q8T8
344.6
976.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-57% / -63%
-40% / -41%
-23% / -22%
-37% / -41%
-63% / -75%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3470 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2395 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 526.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 463.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2185 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2377 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.84 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 145 MB/s

GPU Performance

The GeForce RTX 2070 mobile in our MSI performs where we expect it to be at about 10 to 14 percent faster than the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q or 22 percent slower than the desktop GeForce RTX 2070. Performance when gaming is slightly higher than average by just a few percentage points likely due to both the new processor and the roomy 32 GB of DDR4-2666 RAM.

Idling on Witcher 3 for an hour shows steady frame rates with no unexpected dips for a smooth gaming performance.

See our dedicated page on the GeForce RTX 2070 mobile for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Time Spy
Time Spy
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
 
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
14492 Points ∼77% +93%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
9854 Points ∼52% +32%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
9656 Points ∼51% +29%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
8379 Points ∼44% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (7006 - 8028, n=17)
7641 Points ∼41% +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
7492 Points ∼40%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
6695 Points ∼35% -11%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
6340 Points ∼34% -15%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5931 Points ∼31% -21%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
4298 Points ∼23% -43%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
3568 Points ∼19% -52%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
2330 Points ∼12% -69%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
14057 Points ∼80% +90%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
10012 Points ∼57% +35%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
9508 Points ∼54% +28%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
8043 Points ∼46% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (6890 - 8253, n=17)
7527 Points ∼43% +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
7404 Points ∼42%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
6521 Points ∼37% -12%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
6117 Points ∼35% -17%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5944 Points ∼34% -20%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
4105 Points ∼23% -45%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
3559 Points ∼20% -52%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
2474 Points ∼14% -67%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
33935 Points ∼78% +66%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
25497 Points ∼59% +25%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
23833 Points ∼55% +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
22326 Points ∼51% +9%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
20392 Points ∼47%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (18169 - 21138, n=18)
20074 Points ∼46% -2%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
17466 Points ∼40% -14%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
17119 Points ∼39% -16%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
15164 Points ∼35% -26%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
12441 Points ∼29% -39%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11563 Points ∼27% -43%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
9428 Points ∼22% -54%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7866 Points ∼18% -61%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
18934 Points ∼84% +38%
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
18534 Points ∼82% +35%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13804 Points ∼61% +1%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
13722 Points ∼61%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
12758 Points ∼56% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
12708 Points ∼56% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (8716 - 16364, n=20)
12611 Points ∼56% -8%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
11914 Points ∼53% -13%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
9839 Points ∼44% -28%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
9107 Points ∼40% -34%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
7309 Points ∼32% -47%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7163 Points ∼32% -48%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
6838 Points ∼30% -50%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
43576 Points ∼74% +68%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
34846 Points ∼59% +34%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
30746 Points ∼52% +18%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
30456 Points ∼52% +17%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
26005 Points ∼44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (23335 - 27265, n=20)
25699 Points ∼44% -1%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
22523 Points ∼38% -13%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
21492 Points ∼37% -17%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
20862 Points ∼36% -20%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
16335 Points ∼28% -37%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14723 Points ∼25% -43%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
13575 Points ∼23% -48%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
9394 Points ∼16% -64%
3DMark 06 Standard
39513 points
3DMark 11 Performance
21386 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
39359 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17768 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7404 points
Help
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
124 fps ∼100% +33%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
110 fps ∼89% +18%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
93 fps ∼75%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (74.2 - 97, n=11)
88.7 fps ∼72% -5%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
83 fps ∼67% -11%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
79 (52min) fps ∼64% -15%
Asus G752VS
Intel Core i7-6820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
72 (59min) fps ∼58% -23%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
64 fps ∼52% -31%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
141 fps ∼100% +32%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
116 fps ∼82% +8%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
107 fps ∼76%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
100 fps ∼71% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (86 - 114, n=10)
100 fps ∼71% -7%
Asus G752VS
Intel Core i7-6820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
86 (71min) fps ∼61% -20%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
84 (56min) fps ∼60% -21%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
81 fps ∼57% -24%
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
178 fps ∼100% +32%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
135 fps ∼76% 0%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
135 fps ∼76%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
133 fps ∼75% -1%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
129 fps ∼72% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (91.3 - 160, n=9)
124 fps ∼70% -8%
Asus G752VS
Intel Core i7-6820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
111 (83min) fps ∼62% -18%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
95 (65min) fps ∼53% -30%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
109 (94min - 120max) fps ∼100% +33%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
95.5 fps ∼88% +16%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
82.1 (77min - 86max) fps ∼75%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (64 - 82.1, n=20)
74.1 fps ∼68% -10%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.9 fps ∼63% -16%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
60.6 fps ∼56% -26%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
182 (156min - 213max) fps ∼100% +13%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
175.9 fps ∼97% +9%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
160.8 (152min - 177max) fps ∼88%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (116 - 161, n=16)
140 fps ∼77% -13%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
131 fps ∼72% -19%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
116 fps ∼64% -28%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
284.2 fps ∼100% +16%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
263 (219min - 293max) fps ∼93% +8%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
244.5 (232min - 258max) fps ∼86%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (154 - 250, n=11)
222 fps ∼78% -9%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
215.4 fps ∼76% -12%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
191.6 fps ∼67% -22%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
414.3 fps ∼100% +27%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
326.4 (306min - 354max) fps ∼79%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
301 (256min - 341max) fps ∼73% -8%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
295.3 fps ∼71% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (194 - 357, n=11)
289 fps ∼70% -11%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
287.9 fps ∼69% -12%
01020304050607080