MSI GP65 10SFK Laptop Review: 10th Gen Intel Core i7 Leaves its Mark

MSI announced their first batch of gaming laptops earlier this month shipping with Intel 10th gen Comet Lake-H processors. We've already tested the refreshed MSI GF75 10SCXR and brand new MSI GS66 10SFS since then with more to come in the near future.
The latest model we have today is the GP65 10SFK to replace last year's GP65 9SE. Aside from the differences in CPU, GPU, and display panel, however, the chassis remains identical year-over-year. We recommend checking out our existing review on the GP65 9SE as many of our comments apply here as well.
The GP65 competes directly with other mid-range 15.6-inch gaming laptops like the Asus TUF FX505, HP Omen 15, Aorus 15, and the Lenovo Legion Y540. Our specific configuration with the Core i7-10750H CPU, GeForce RTX 2070 GPU, and 144 Hz FHD display can be found online for about $1500 USD.
More MSI reviews:
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83 % | 05/2020 | MSI GP65 10SFK-047US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 27.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82 % | 10/2019 | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.4 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80 % | 07/2019 | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 26.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86 % | 06/2019 | HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86 % | 06/2019 | Aorus 15-SA i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.1 kg | 24.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1.000 USD/Euros
Best Displays, for University Students
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤5-inch, Camera SmartphonesThe Best Smartphones for Less Than 160 Euros
Case
SD Card Reader
SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US | |
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US | |
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Communication
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR |
Webcam

Maintenance
The bottom panel is secured by several Philips screws including one that is under a warranty seal sticker. Removing the panel can be tricky since the latches around the edges and corners are finicky and difficult to detach. Once inside, users will have access to two storage bays and two SODIMM slots. Note that the second M.2 2280 slot adjacent to the SODIMM slots is removed on the GP65 series.
Accessories and Warranty
There are no extras in the box other than the usual paperwork and AC adapter. The standard one-year limited warranty applies with additional protection available if purchased from CUKUSA.
Display
The LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3 IPS panel on our MSI is the first to appear in our database. A similar LP156WFG-SPB2 panel can be found on the Aorus 15 with nearly the same characteristics including the native 144 Hz refresh rate, fast black-white and gray-gray response times, and relatively wide color space.
The panel on our MSI is notably brighter than average for its category at 390 nits. In comparison, other gaming laptops like the Asus Strix Scar III or Dell Alienware m15 tend to top out at 300 nits. The main drawback to the panel is its average contrast ratio of about 600:1 whereas the panels on pricier gaming laptops like on the GS65 are closer to 1000:1.
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 384.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 574:1 (Black: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 2.03
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
93.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US LG Philips LGD0625, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-dc1303ng LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | MSI GP62 7REX-1045US CMN N156HGE-EAL, TN LED, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 11% | -10% | -161% | -14% | -174% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 10.4 (6.4, 4) | 9.6 (6, 3.6) 8% | 15 (8, 7) -44% | 30.4 (14, 16.4) -192% | 14 (7, 7) -35% | 34.4 (22.4, 12.4) -231% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12 (6.8, 5.2) | 10.4 (6, 4.4) 13% | 9 (5, 4) 25% | 27.6 (17.6, 10) -130% | 11 (7, 4) 8% | 26 (20, 6) -117% |
PWM Frequency | 250 (20) | 200 (99) | ||||
Screen | 15% | -16% | -61% | 2% | -104% | |
Brightness middle | 384.9 | 348.3 -10% | 309 -20% | 286.2 -26% | 316 -18% | 265.7 -31% |
Brightness | 358 | 327 -9% | 284 -21% | 267 -25% | 295 -18% | 243 -32% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 85 -2% | 88 1% | 84 -3% | 84 -3% | 87 0% |
Black Level * | 0.67 | 0.4 40% | 0.42 37% | 0.33 51% | 0.42 37% | 0.63 6% |
Contrast | 574 | 871 52% | 736 28% | 867 51% | 752 31% | 422 -26% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 2.43 | 1.6 34% | 3.99 -64% | 5.45 -124% | 2.7 -11% | 9.6 -295% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 4.58 | 5.07 -11% | 8.3 -81% | 18.08 -295% | 5.65 -23% | 18.5 -304% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 2.03 | 1 51% | 1.12 45% | 4.47 -120% | 1.58 22% | |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 2.6 | 2.3 12% | 5.43 -109% | 5.3 -104% | 2.35 10% | 12.7 -388% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.203 100% | 2.57 86% | 2.1 105% | 2.41 91% | 2.01 109% |
CCT | 6981 93% | 6707 97% | 7767 84% | 7679 85% | 6904 94% | 13654 48% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.7 | 61 2% | 63 6% | 37.6 -37% | 60 1% | 76 27% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93.9 | 96 2% | 97 3% | 59.1 -37% | 93 -1% | 100 6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 13% /
14% | -13% /
-15% | -111% /
-76% | -6% /
0% | -139% /
-115% |
* ... smaller is better
Color space covers approximately 94 percent of sRGB and 60 percent of AdobeRGB to be smaller than the color space available on the older GP62 TN panel. However, the superior response times, refresh rate, viewing angles, and overall quality of the newer panel more than make up for the color deficit.
Measurements with an X-Rite colorimeter reveal a well-calibrated display out of the box. Calibrating the display even further ourselves would result in only marginal improvements across the board meaning end-users won't need to do anything else to get the most out of the display.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.4 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Outdoor visibility is still average for the category since gaming laptops are not designed to be used outside frequently. Most Ultrabooks have brighter displays to better mitigate glare and washed out colors.
Performance
Processor
Raw CPU performance is roughly 5 to 15 percent faster than the average Core i7-9750H laptop. Users upgrading from an older Core i7-8750H laptop will see more significant gains of about 11 to 27 percent. The relatively minor gen-to-gen gains are not unexpected since Comet Lake-H shares the same 14 nm silicon as Coffee Lake-H.
Performance sustainability is excellent nonetheless. Running CineBench R15 Multi-Thread in a loop results in a performance dip of only 4 percent over time.
See our dedicated page on the Core i7-10750H for more technical details and benchmark comparisons. The hexa-core Core i7-10750H is just one step down from the octa-core Core i7-10875H that's available on the Gigabyte Aero 15.
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (2017 - 3133, n=55) | |
Schenker Key 16 | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (416 - 486, n=55) | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
Schenker Key 16 | |
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=82) | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
Schenker Key 16 | |
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (952 - 1306, n=85) | |
Schenker Key 16 | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (342 - 495, n=21) | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (4580 - 5090, n=21) | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28512 - 35174, n=21) | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (1117 - 1251, n=13) | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (4859 - 6262, n=13) | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (7.1 - 10.7, n=21) | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (54.5 - 64.7, n=9) | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (0.608 - 0.695, n=14) | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
Though the differences are minor, PCMark benchmarks are consistently higher than the 2019 GP65. Users upgrading from much older Core i5-7300HQ or i7-7700HQ gaming laptops like the GP62 will see more significant gains.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4516 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5894 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 6254 points | |
Help |
DPC Latency
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Our test unit comes with a 1 TB Samsung SSD PM981 and a secondary 2 TB Seagate ST2000LM007 HDD. The drive is only 5400 RPM, but the fast NVMe SSD more than makes up for it. The Samsung PM981 is faster than the Intel 660p series or the Toshiba XG3 series commonly found on Ultrabooks and other gaming laptops.
See our table of SSDs and HDDs for more benchmark comparisons.
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | MSI GP62 7REX-1045US Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP | MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -79% | -46% | -19% | -49% | -94% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1613.89 | 755.35 -53% | 866.7 -46% | 442.81 -73% | 581.52 -64% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 727.67 | 452.76 -38% | 444.49 -39% | 326.34 -55% | 309.51 -57% | |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2926.74 | 1269.47 -57% | 942.16 -68% | 1128.09 -61% | 992.71 -66% | |
Score Total | 5482 | 1332 -76% | 1717 -69% | 3163 -42% | 1829 -67% | 1940 -65% |
Score Write | 2249 | 586 -74% | 992 -56% | 1642 -27% | 600 -73% | 400 -82% |
Score Read | 2126 | 489 -77% | 472 -78% | 1027 -52% | 849 -60% | 1036 -51% |
Access Time Write * | 0.091 | 0.046 49% | 0.047 48% | 0.032 65% | 0.034 63% | 0.223 -145% |
Access Time Read * | 0.042 | 0.24 -471% | 0.065 -55% | 0.059 -40% | 0.079 -88% | 0.231 -450% |
4K-64 Write | 1877.79 | 403.79 -78% | 787.44 -58% | 1370.77 -27% | 428.18 -77% | 246.8 -87% |
4K-64 Read | 1865.15 | 323.8 -83% | 321.49 -83% | 724.88 -61% | 628.03 -66% | 878.09 -53% |
4K Write | 128.97 | 90.1 -30% | 115.48 -10% | 113.48 -12% | 112.04 -13% | 80.34 -38% |
4K Read | 54.18 | 48.88 -10% | 48.22 -11% | 53.43 -1% | 35.84 -34% | 27.58 -49% |
Seq Write | 2418.17 | 919 -62% | 888.5 -63% | 1574.55 -35% | 601 -75% | 730.48 -70% |
Seq Read | 2065.9 | 1163 -44% | 1019.04 -51% | 2484.55 20% | 1847.57 -11% | 1307.09 -37% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -34% | -33% | -27% | -25% | -32% | |
Write 4K | 145 | 133.3 -8% | 137.5 -5% | 50.19 -65% | 158.4 9% | 99.35 -31% |
Read 4K | 46.84 | 55.34 18% | 56.96 22% | 35.32 -25% | 45.04 -4% | 46.96 0% |
Write Seq | 2377 | 980.2 -59% | 983.8 -59% | 990.6 -58% | 621.6 -74% | |
Read Seq | 2185 | 1406 -36% | 1564 -28% | 1526 -30% | 1592 -27% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 463.5 | 286.3 -38% | 237.4 -49% | 445.1 -4% | 434.2 -6% | 240.1 -48% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 526.5 | 331.5 -37% | 340.7 -35% | 526.2 0% | 589.8 12% | 580.9 10% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2395 | 976.2 -59% | 958.8 -60% | 1647 -31% | 630.4 -74% | 686 -71% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3470 | 1519.8 -56% | 1732 -50% | 3427 -1% | 2108 -39% | 1581.2 -54% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 747.6 | 268.1 | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 344.6 | 976.8 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -57% /
-63% | -40% /
-41% | -23% /
-22% | -37% /
-41% | -63% /
-75% |
* ... smaller is better
GPU Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 mobile in our MSI performs where we expect it to be at about 10 to 14 percent faster than the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q or 22 percent slower than the desktop GeForce RTX 2070. Performance when gaming is slightly higher than average by just a few percentage points likely due to both the new processor and the roomy 32 GB of DDR4-2666 RAM.
Idling on Witcher 3 for an hour shows steady frame rates with no unexpected dips for a smooth gaming performance.
See our dedicated page on the GeForce RTX 2070 mobile for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.
3DMark 06 Standard | 39513 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 21386 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39359 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17768 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7404 points | |
Help |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (74.2 - 97, n=11) | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Alienware 17 R4 | |
Asus G752VS | |
MSI GF65 9SD | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (86 - 114, n=10) | |
Asus G752VS | |
Alienware 17 R4 | |
MSI GF65 9SD | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
MSI GF65 9SD | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (91.3 - 160, n=9) | |
Asus G752VS | |
Alienware 17 R4 |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (64 - 82.1, n=21) | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
MSI GF65 9SD | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (116 - 161, n=17) | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
MSI GF65 9SD | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (154 - 250, n=12) | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
MSI GF65 9SD | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (194 - 357, n=12) | |
MSI GF65 9SD |