Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10100 vs Intel Core i7-9750H vs Intel Core i3-10320

Intel Core i3-10100

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-10100 is a four-core desktop processor based on the Comet Lake S architecture. The processor clocks at 3.6 - 4.3 GHz and can process up to 8 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i3-10100 is manufactured in the improved 14nm process (14nm++). Compared to the older i3-9100 (Comet Lake-S), the 10100 offers a 100 MHz higher turbo clock, multithreading and support for faster DDR4-2666 memory.

Performance

The performance should be only slightly above the Core i3-9100 in the entry level for desktop CPUs. Thus the performance is sufficient for office and undemanding gaming.

Graphics Card

The Intel Core i3-10100 is a processor with a rather slow entry level integrated graphics unit (Intel UHD Graphics 630). 

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

Intel Core i7-9750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9750H

The Intel Core i7-9750H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.5 GHz (4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i7-8750H, the 9750H offers improved clock rates and a larger L3 cache.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now max. eight cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to the Intel Core i9-8950HK, an expensive hexa-core processor of the previous generation. While performance gains over the outgoing 8th Gen H-class chips are unimpressive to say the least, the average Core i7-9750H in our database is much faster than the Ryzen 7 3750H and other H-class Ryzen chips AMD sells as of mid 2019.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of around 70 W, the Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 9750H that we know of. It can be 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz compared to the UHD 630 of the 8750H CPU. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to reduce slightly, 35 W being the lowest Intel-recommended value. Doing so would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The hexa-core Intel CPU is made with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for below average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i3-10320

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10320

The Intel Core i3-10320 is an entry level quad-core desktop processor based on the Comet Lake-S architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.8 and 4.6 GHz and can execute up to eight threads with its four cores simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The performance is similar to the old high end Intel Core i7-7700K due to the same architecture and similar clock speeds. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 90 Watt are consumed (PL2 for 28s).

ModelIntel Core i3-10100Intel Core i7-9750HIntel Core i3-10320
CodenameComet Lake-SCoffee Lake-HComet Lake-S
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10850K3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-109103.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 « 3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H « 2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-109103.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 « 3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-101003.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4300 MHz2600 - 4500 MHz3800 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache6 MB12 MB7.9 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 124 / 8
TDP65 Watt45 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
Die Size126 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFCLGA1200BGA1440LGA 1200
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationLPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86x86
$130 U.S.$162 U.S.
Announced
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9750H
29.9 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10320
30 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5986 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1185 Points (50%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
436 Points (47%)
min: 416     avg: 442.5     median: 442 (48%)     max: 486 Points
458 Points (50%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2181 Points (5%)
min: 2017     avg: 2564     median: 2599 (6%)     max: 3133 Points
2320 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
895 Points (6%)
min: 952     avg: 1182     median: 1188 (7%)     max: 1306 Points
949 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
181 Points (50%)
min: 170     avg: 183.7     median: 185.5 (51%)     max: 194 Points
188 Points (52%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.9 Points (13%)
min: 11.26     avg: 13     median: 13.1 (17%)     max: 14.11 Points
10.5 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (49%)
2.1 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6863 Points (41%)
min: 6659     avg: 6923     median: 6970 (42%)     max: 7214 Points
7164 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
26903 Points (19%)
min: 28251     avg: 33539     median: 34445 (25%)     max: 36304 Points
28383 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
34987 Points (22%)
min: 37188     avg: 40129     median: 38960 (25%)     max: 44238 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8914 Points (11%)
min: 9069     avg: 9165     median: 9081 (11%)     max: 9346 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
194.1 s (2%)
154.4 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.3 s (1%)
4.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6124 Points (10%)
min: 6160     avg: 6396     median: 6395.5 (10%)     max: 6631 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 24319     avg: 24356     median: 24355.5 (14%)     max: 24392 MIPS
min: 28512     avg: 32357     median: 33303 (19%)     max: 35174 MIPS
25864 MIPS (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4797     avg: 4853     median: 4853 (57%)     max: 4909 MIPS
min: 4580     avg: 4846     median: 4865 (57%)     max: 5090 MIPS
4899 MIPS (58%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
55.8 fps (19%)
min: 69.6     avg: 70.3     median: 70.3 (23%)     max: 70.9 fps
58.8 fps (20%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
212.5 fps (49%)
min: 211     avg: 214.8     median: 214.8 (50%)     max: 218.6 fps
218 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.7     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (14%)     max: 7.78 fps
min: 7.1     avg: 8.7     median: 8.8 (16%)     max: 10.7 fps
8.2 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (15%)
min: 0.7     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (21%)     max: 0.75 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
0.9 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
min: 7.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.4 (19%)     max: 7.4 GB/s
5.3 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 492.2     avg: 493.7     median: 493.7 (3%)     max: 495.1 Seconds
min: 342.1     avg: 433.3     median: 435.2 (3%)     max: 494.9 Seconds
469 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.634     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.652 sec
min: 0.608     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.695 sec
0.6 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9618     avg: 10722     median: 10791.5 (23%)     max: 11365 Points
9911 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.9 s (2%)
min: 8.3     avg: 8.5     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.96 s
9.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20 s (1%)
min: 18.4     avg: 18.9     median: 18.5 (1%)     max: 20.09 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
481.8 s (2%)
min: 450.5     avg: 471.8     median: 467.3 (2%)     max: 502 s
516 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 35262     avg: 41819     median: 42706.5 (33%)     max: 46599 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9704     avg: 12766     median: 13028.5 (32%)     max: 14337 Points
10518 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 61562     avg: 74373     median: 74373 (60%)     max: 87184 Points
min: 15356     avg: 56549     median: 58809 (48%)     max: 60819 Points
63063 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 61702     avg: 74370     median: 74369.5 (60%)     max: 87037 Points
min: 53777     avg: 58538     median: 58661 (48%)     max: 61050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 62930     avg: 74011     median: 74011 (61%)     max: 85092 Points
min: 56756     avg: 59035     median: 58584 (49%)     max: 61319 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9394     avg: 16477     median: 16477 (42%)     max: 23560 Points
min: 8293     avg: 10689     median: 11022 (28%)     max: 11708 Points
9675 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13268     avg: 24581     median: 24581 (44%)     max: 35894 Points
min: 12438     avg: 16332     median: 16696.5 (30%)     max: 17788 Points
13564 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5274     avg: 5304     median: 5303.5 (22%)     max: 5333 Points
min: 4620     avg: 6334     median: 6463.5 (27%)     max: 7171 Points
4368 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1171     avg: 1188     median: 1187.5 (46%)     max: 1204 Points
min: 1117     avg: 1190     median: 1204 (47%)     max: 1251 Points
1217 Points (48%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4740     avg: 4758     median: 4758 (9%)     max: 4776 Points
min: 4859     avg: 5597     median: 5813 (10%)     max: 6262 Points
4846 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1167     avg: 1184     median: 1183.5 (5%)     max: 1200 Points
min: 1105     avg: 1179     median: 1171 (5%)     max: 1248 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4724     avg: 4748     median: 4748 (15%)     max: 4772 Points
min: 4812     avg: 5575     median: 5635 (18%)     max: 6230 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5494     avg: 5563     median: 5563 (56%)     max: 5632 Points
min: 4440     avg: 5238     median: 5266 (53%)     max: 5511 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18622     avg: 18692     median: 18692 (19%)     max: 18762 Points
min: 17054     avg: 22076     median: 22951 (23%)     max: 25043 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5377     avg: 5570     median: 5569.5 (62%)     max: 5762 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24370     avg: 24660     median: 24659.5 (36%)     max: 24949 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21185     avg: 22450     median: 22711.5 (40%)     max: 23587 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 4137     avg: 4243     median: 4252.5 (83%)     max: 4428 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 833     avg: 836     median: 835.5 (1%)     max: 838 ms
min: 0     avg: 1048     median: 1071 (1%)     max: 1713 ms
784 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 82.6     avg: 84.3     median: 84.1 (1%)     max: 86.6 ms
160 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 22874     avg: 35814     median: 36178 (27%)     max: 39708 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 202     avg: 207.5     median: 207.5 (37%)     max: 213 Points
min: 199     avg: 211.4     median: 208.5 (37%)     max: 231 Points
224 Points (40%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1254 Points (47%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.5     avg: 115.2     median: 115.2 (20%)     max: 121.9 Watt
min: 61.4     avg: 75.5     median: 72.3 (12%)     max: 96 Watt
115 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 96.7     avg: 101.9     median: 101.9 (19%)     max: 107.1 Watt
min: 57.7     avg: 78.5     median: 80.5 (15%)     max: 95.4 Watt
96.3 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
9.3 Points per Watt (7%)
min: 12.4     avg: 15.2     median: 15.3 (11%)     max: 17.6 Points per Watt
9.9 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10100 → 100% n=28

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9750H → 111% n=28

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10320 → 99% n=28

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 07. 06:20:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12793 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11352 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14009 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751862009s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 07 Jul 2025 05:21:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12793 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 12793 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11352 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 11352 +0.096s ... 0.116s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14009 +0.004s ... 0.12s

#13 got single benchmarks 14009 +0.004s ... 0.124s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.124s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.081s ... 0.205s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.205s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)