Intel Iris Graphics 540 vs NVIDIA GeForce 945M vs Intel HD Graphics 505
Intel Iris Graphics 540 ► remove from comparison
The Intel Iris Graphics 540 (GT3e) is an integrated graphics unit of the Skylake generation. As successors of the HD Graphics 6000 (Broadwell), the Iris Graphics 540 can be found in CPUs of 15-watt series and offers 64 MB of dedicated eDRAM memory. Furthermore, the so-called GT3e-version features 48 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at up to 1050 MHz (depending on the CPU model). Besides the eDRAM cache, the Iris 540 is able to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133).
Compared to the Iris Graphics 550 of the 28-watt series, the Iris Graphics 540 differs only by its slightly lower maximum clock and a nearly halved TDP, which limits the utilization of the Turbo Boost in certain situations.
Performance
The exact performance of the Iris Graphics 540 depends on various factors like memory configuration (DDR3/DDR4) and maximum clock rate of the specific model. The fastest versions (Core i7-6650U ) should be slightly ahead of a dedicated GeForce 920M and will handle modern games (as of 2015) in low or medium settings.
Features
The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Displays can be connected via DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz), whereas HDMI is limited to the older version 1.4a (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 30 Hz). However, HDMI 2.0 can be added using a DisplayPort converter. Up to three displays can be controlled simultaneously.
Power Consumption
The Iris Graphics 540 can be found in mobile processors specified at 15 W TDP and is therefore suited for compact laptops and ultrabooks.
NVIDIA GeForce 945M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA GeForce 945M is a mid-range, DirectX 12-compatible graphics card for laptops unveiled in March 2015. It is based on Nvidia's Maxwell architecture (GM107 chip) and manufactured in 28 nm. The 945M offers 512 shaders (compared to the 640 of the GTX 950M ) clocked at 928 MHz. The dedicated DDR3 graphics memory is connected with a 128 Bit bus clocked at 1000 MHz (effective 2000, 32 GB/s).
Architecture
Compared to Kepler, Maxwell has been optimized in several details to increase power efficiency. Smaller Streaming Multiprocessors (SMM) with only 128 ALUs (Kepler: 192) and an optimized scheduler should lead to better utilization of the shaders. Nvidia promises that a Maxwell SMM with 128 ALUs can offer 90 percent of the performance of a Kepler SMX with 192 ALUs. GM107 features 5 SMMs and thus 640 shader cores, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs (128-bit interface).
Another optimization is the massively enlarged L2 cache (GM107: 2 MB). The increased size can handle some of the memory traffic to allow for a relatively narrow memory interface without significantly reducing the performance.
GM107 supports DirectX 12 with feature level 11_0 only.
Performance
The performance of the 945M is slightly worse than the GTX 950M but clearly faster than the 940M . The DDR3 variant of the GTX 950M is about 10 percent faster for example. Therefore, it is most suited for medium details of demanding games in 2015 (see below for benchmarks).
Features
GM107 integrates the sixth generation of the PureVideo HD video engine (VP6), offering a better decoding performance for H.264 and MPEG-2 videos. Of course, VP6 supports all features of previous generations (4K support, PIP, video encoding via NVENC API). Unfortunately, HDMI 2.0 is still not supported.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the GeForce 945M should be somewhere around 40 Watt. Therefore it is most suited for bigger laptops from 14-inch and up.
Intel HD Graphics 505 ► remove from comparison
The Intel HD Graphics 505 is an integrated processor graphics unit from the Apollo Lake generation (e. g. Pentium N4200), which was announced mid 2016. The GPU can convince with low consumption figures, but the performance is only in the low-end segment and is rarely sufficient for modern games. Being the maximum configuration of the Apollo Lake GPU, the HD Graphics 505 is equipped with 18 Execution Units (EUs) running at up to 750 MHz. The technical specifications of the GPU are based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which is also used for the more expensive Skylake series.
Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 505 has to access the main memory via processor (2x 64bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).
Performance
The HD Graphics 505 should be slightly slower than the older Core-M GPU HD Graphics 5300 , so modern games (as of 2016) will rarely run smoothly even at the lowest settings.
Features
The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Up to three displays can be connected via DP/eDP or HDMI (4K probably only at 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).
Power Consumption
The TDP of the whole Pentium N4200 chip is 6 Watts by default, so the GPU is primarily used for (often passively cooled) netbooks or thin notebooks. The TDP can also be reduced to 4 Watts, but this will obviously affect the performance.
Intel Iris Graphics 540 NVIDIA GeForce 945M Intel HD Graphics 505 Gen. 9 Series Codename Skylake GT3e Apollo Lake Architecture Gen. 9 Skylake Maxwell Gen. 9 Apollo Lake Pipelines 48 - unified 512 - unified 18 - unified Core Speed 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz 928 - 1045 (Boost) MHz 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz Memory Bus Width eDRAM + 64/128 Bit 128 Bit 64/128 Bit Memory Type eDRAM DDR3 Max. Amount of Memory 64 MB 4 GB Shared Memory yes no yes API DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4 DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4 technology 14 nm 28 nm 14 nm Features QuickSync GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, PhysX, CUDA, GeForce Experience QuickSync Date of Announcement 01.09.2015 12.03.2015 01.09.2016 Memory Speed 2000 MHz Transistors 1.9 Billion Notebook Size medium sized
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Iris Graphics 540
0.7 pt (2%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - GeForce 945M
1.3 pt (4%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 505
0.2 pt (1%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 87 avg: 115.8 median: 107.5 (0%) max: 161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 76 avg: 101.5 median: 94 (0%) max: 142 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 116490 avg: 126223 median: 126078 (14%) max: 136248 Points
193684 Points (22%)
min: 27199 avg: 32979 median: 32480.5 (4%) max: 41454 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 45185 avg: 56792 median: 56791.5 (7%) max: 68398 Points
95097 Points (12%)
min: 8531 avg: 19014 median: 18860 (2%) max: 28843 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 6730 avg: 7255 median: 7235 (8%) max: 7822 Points
min: 7913 avg: 9643 median: 9643 (10%) max: 11373 Points
min: 2411 avg: 2877 median: 2837.5 (3%) max: 3558 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 9392 avg: 10896 median: 11327 (3%) max: 11893 Points
min: 17980 avg: 19405 median: 19405 (5%) max: 20830 Points
min: 2844 avg: 3609 median: 3413.5 (1%) max: 4738 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1106 avg: 1268 median: 1354 (2%) max: 1395 Points
min: 2434 avg: 2505 median: 2504.5 (4%) max: 2575 Points
min: 324 avg: 417.3 median: 383 (1%) max: 565 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1193 avg: 1358 median: 1448 (2%) max: 1479 Points
min: 2816 avg: 2850 median: 2850 (3%) max: 2884 Points
min: 344 avg: 448.6 median: 408 (0%) max: 606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 67714 avg: 81160 median: 82680.5 (10%) max: 91565 Points
min: 55858 avg: 85596 median: 85595.5 (10%) max: 115333 Points
min: 26964 avg: 33899 median: 36228 (4%) max: 39766 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2039 avg: 2340 median: 2364 (3%) max: 2624 Points
min: 2877 avg: 3451 median: 3451 (5%) max: 4025 Points
min: 476 avg: 692 median: 679 (1%) max: 899 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1898 avg: 2187 median: 2211.5 (2%) max: 2450 Points
min: 2759 avg: 3310 median: 3309.5 (3%) max: 3860 Points
min: 424 avg: 632 median: 620 (1%) max: 825 Points
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel Iris Graphics 540 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 8647 avg: 8828 median: 8828 (3%) max: 9009 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 945M
13507 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel HD Graphics 505
min: 1957 avg: 2351 median: 2350.5 (1%) max: 2744 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel Iris Graphics 540 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 8052 avg: 8220 median: 8219.5 (5%) max: 8387 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 945M
12567 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel HD Graphics 505
min: 1656 avg: 2073 median: 2072.5 (1%) max: 2489 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel Iris Graphics 540
min: 13403 avg: 13569 median: 13568.5 (18%) max: 13734 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 945M
20209 Points (26%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 505
min: 3721 avg: 4303 median: 4302.5 (6%) max: 4884 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
6.5 fps (2%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
8.9 fps (2%)
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
0.9 fps (1%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
1.2 fps (1%)
specvp11 sw-02 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
6.6 fps (5%)
specvp11 proe-05 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
0.8 fps (1%)
specvp11 maya-03 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
5.6 fps (4%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
8.7 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
1.3 fps (1%)
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + Intel Iris Graphics 540 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 26.2 avg: 26.3 median: 26.3 (7%) max: 26.3 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + Intel Iris Graphics 540 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 2.6 avg: 2.8 median: 2.8 (0%) max: 2.9 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + Intel Iris Graphics 540 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 8.2 avg: 8.5 median: 8.5 (2%) max: 8.8 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + Intel Iris Graphics 540 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 2.7 avg: 3.9 median: 3.9 (1%) max: 5.1 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + Intel Iris Graphics 540 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 16.5 avg: 16.8 median: 16.8 (5%) max: 17 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + Intel Iris Graphics 540 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.08 avg: 0.2 median: 0.2 (0%) max: 0.33 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + Intel Iris Graphics 540 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
10.8 fps (4%)
specvp12 catia-04 + Intel Iris Graphics 540 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 15.2 avg: 15.4 median: 15.4 (3%) max: 15.5 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + Intel Iris Graphics 540 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
14.6 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel Iris Graphics 540 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 7271 avg: 8395 median: 8277.5 (6%) max: 9755 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 945M
min: 5106 avg: 5899 median: 5899 (4%) max: 6692 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 505
min: 32.61 avg: 2776 median: 3155 (2%) max: 3331 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Graphics 540 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 41.07 avg: 46.9 median: 47.9 (17%) max: 50.6 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce 945M
min: 27.2 avg: 32.6 median: 32.6 (11%) max: 38.01 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
min: 9.78 avg: 12.1 median: 12.5 (4%) max: 13.53 fps
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Graphics 540 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 35.34 avg: 52.5 median: 55.3 (3%) max: 62.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce 945M
min: 33.74 avg: 39.3 median: 39.3 (2%) max: 44.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
min: 11.3 avg: 16.1 median: 16.6 (1%) max: 19.87 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel Iris Graphics 540 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8 avg: 98.1 median: 97.8 (98%) max: 99.3 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce 945M
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
min: 97.7 avg: 97.8 median: 97.8 (98%) max: 97.8 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
4.8 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
12 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
42 fps (5%)
min: 10 avg: 10.2 median: 10.2 (1%) max: 10.3 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
60.4 fps (1%)
14.1 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
86 fps (5%)
113.6 fps (7%)
18.9 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel Iris Graphics 540 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
183 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA GeForce 945M
208.5 fps (2%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 505 47.2 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 258 avg: 291.8 median: 301.5 (1%) max: 306 Samples/s
439 Samples/s (2%)
min: 62 avg: 87 median: 87 (0%) max: 112 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 614 avg: 700 median: 712.5 (1%) max: 762 Samples/s
733 Samples/s (1%)
min: 93 avg: 141.5 median: 141.5 (0%) max: 190 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1257 avg: 1483 median: 1525.5 (2%) max: 1625 Points
382 Points (0%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
19 Watt (3%)
Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Graphics 540 → 100% n=20 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 945M → 133% n=20 Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 505 → 33% n=20
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
114 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
94 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
74 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
71 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
174 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
24.4 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
9.5 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
23.6 fps
23%
HD Graphics 505:
5.5 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
16.9 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
13.6 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
17.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
30 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
27.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
55.3 fps
4%
HD Graphics 505:
2.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
38.6 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
14.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
112 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
76 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
30.6 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
19.1 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
43.4 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
25.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
12.6 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
11.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
61 (!) [X] Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 Intel Core i5-6360U 2GHz
Iris Graphics 540
Problem during benchmarking occured: small graphical problems min:
51 fps, max:
75 fps
fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
72 (!) [X] Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 Intel Core i5-6360U 2GHz
Iris Graphics 540
Problem during benchmarking occured: small graphical problems min:
61 fps, max:
80 fps
fps
Iris Graphics 540:
0 (!) fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
16.7 20.5 ~ 19 fps
27%
HD Graphics 505:
5.1 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
35 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
20.5 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
58.2 68 ~ 63 fps
11%
HD Graphics 505:
7.1 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
40 47.6 ~ 44 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
18.9 21.3 ~ 20 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
31.5 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
13.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
17.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
13.5 17.7 ~ 16 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
13.8 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
7.6 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
21.7 27.9 (!) [X] Intel NUC6i5SYH Intel Core i5-6260U 1.8GHz
Iris Graphics 540
Problem during benchmarking occured: small graphical problems some missing textures in benchmarkmin:
20 fps, max:
35 fps
~ 25 fps
21%
HD Graphics 505:
5.2 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
12.9 fps
24%
HD Graphics 505:
3.1 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
22 22 23 ~ 22 fps
14%
HD Graphics 505:
3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
10 11 12 ~ 11 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
8 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
18 27.6 ~ 23 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
6.7 8.9 ~ 8 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
21.5 23.7 24.9 (!) [X] Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 Intel Core i5-6360U 2GHz
Iris Graphics 540
Problem during benchmarking occured: small graphical problems wrong cloudsmin:
23 fps, max:
27 fps
~ 23 fps
30%
HD Graphics 505:
5.6 6.1 6.2 8.8 [X] Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
~ 7 fps
36%
HD Graphics 505:
4 4 4.1 4.5 [X] Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
~ 4 fps
Iris Graphics 540:
0 (!) fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
39.1 44.3 ~ 42 fps
36%
HD Graphics 505:
15 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
24.2 27.4 ~ 26 fps
34%
HD Graphics 505:
8.9 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
13.5 16.8 ~ 15 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
11 13.6 ~ 12 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
35.9 fps
18%
HD Graphics 505:
6.6 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
28.6 fps
14%
HD Graphics 505:
4.1 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
15.5 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
14.2 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
40.2 fps
27%
HD Graphics 505:
10.9 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
22.9 fps
28%
HD Graphics 505:
6.3 fps
Iris Graphics 540:
0 (!) fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
4.9 5.2 ~ 5 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
23.2 fps
167%
GeForce 945M:
63.3 fps
31%
HD Graphics 505:
11.8 fps
180%
GeForce 945M:
37.8 fps
31%
HD Graphics 505:
6.5 fps
191%
GeForce 945M:
17.2 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
65 (!) [X] Intel NUC6i5SYH Intel Core i5-6260U 1.8GHz
Iris Graphics 540
Problem during benchmarking occured: slight slowdownsmin:
56 fps, max:
72 fps
fps
160%
GeForce 945M:
103.7 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
38.8 (!) [X] Intel NUC6i5SYH Intel Core i5-6260U 1.8GHz
Iris Graphics 540
Problem during benchmarking occured: slow gameplaymin:
33 fps, max:
43 fps
fps
179%
GeForce 945M:
69.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
78.7 120 ~ 99 fps
132%
GeForce 945M:
130.2 fps
25%
HD Graphics 505:
25.2 fps
170%
GeForce 945M:
113.7 fps
24%
HD Graphics 505:
16.4 fps
212%
GeForce 945M:
65.6 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
18.7 25.4 ~ 22 fps
199%
GeForce 945M:
43.7 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
48.6 58 ~ 53 fps
39%
HD Graphics 505:
20.7 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
28.9 43.3 ~ 36 fps
38%
HD Graphics 505:
13.8 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
13.9 16.7 ~ 15 fps
235%
GeForce 945M:
35.2 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
28.9 34.3 ~ 32 fps
204%
GeForce 945M:
65.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
13.2 16.9 ~ 15 fps
211%
GeForce 945M:
31.6 fps
46%
HD Graphics 505:
32 fps
42%
HD Graphics 505:
22 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
19.1 34.6 ~ 27 fps
273%
GeForce 945M:
51.9 fps
255%
GeForce 945M:
30.6 fps
Iris Graphics 540:
0 (!) fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
119.2 149 177 (!) [X] Intel NUC6i5SYH Intel Core i5-6260U 1.8GHz
Iris Graphics 540
Problem during benchmarking occured: small graphical problems reflections on hood too muchmin:
156 fps, max:
206 fps
~ 148 fps
155%
GeForce 945M:
229 fps
25%
HD Graphics 505:
36.5 fps
281%
GeForce 945M:
98.5 fps
36%
HD Graphics 505:
12.7 fps
310%
GeForce 945M:
52.7 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
12.5 12.5 ~ 13 fps
170%
GeForce 945M:
22.1 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
59 fps
200%
GeForce 945M:
117.8 fps
12%
HD Graphics 505:
7.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
50 fps
180%
GeForce 945M:
89.8 fps
14%
HD Graphics 505:
6.9 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
19.5 fps
166%
GeForce 945M:
32.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
10.4 fps
196%
GeForce 945M:
20.4 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
52.3 fps
188%
GeForce 945M:
98.4 fps
20%
HD Graphics 505:
10.6 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
35.2 fps
21%
HD Graphics 505:
7.5 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
11.6 fps
183%
GeForce 945M:
21.2 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
32.2 fps
141%
GeForce 945M:
45.5 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
23.3 fps
30%
HD Graphics 505:
6.5 [X] Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
7.8 ~ 7 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
15.7 fps
285%
GeForce 945M:
44.7 fps
32%
HD Graphics 505:
4.2 [X] Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
5.1 ~ 5 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
13.7 fps
26%
HD Graphics 505:
3.5 [X] Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
29.8 (!) 65 (!) [X] Intel NUC6i5SYH Intel Core i5-6260U 1.8GHz
Iris Graphics 540
Problem during benchmarking occured: small graphical problems street textures wrongmin:
59 fps, max:
87 fps
~ 47 fps
238%
GeForce 945M:
111.9 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
18.4 (!) 45.1 (!) [X] Intel NUC6i5SYH Intel Core i5-6260U 1.8GHz
Iris Graphics 540
Problem during benchmarking occured: small graphical problems street textures wrongmin:
39 fps, max:
56 fps
~ 32 fps
245%
GeForce 945M:
78.3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
11.4 31.3 (!) [X] Intel NUC6i5SYH Intel Core i5-6260U 1.8GHz
Iris Graphics 540
Problem during benchmarking occured: small graphical problems street textures wrongmin:
29 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 21 fps
259%
GeForce 945M:
54.4 fps
43%
HD Graphics 505:
8.3 9.5 ~ 9 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
10.4 fps
208%
GeForce 945M:
21.6 fps
204%
GeForce 945M:
81.5 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
23 35.4 38 ~ 32 fps
208%
GeForce 945M:
66.7 fps
184%
GeForce 945M:
38.6 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
9.5 11 ~ 10 fps
188%
GeForce 945M:
18.8 fps
188%
GeForce 945M:
148.5 fps
202%
GeForce 945M:
92.9 fps
202%
GeForce 945M:
78.7 fps
240%
GeForce 945M:
26.4 fps
27%
HD Graphics 505:
2.5 3.1 [X] Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
~ 3 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
85 137 ~ 111 fps
210%
GeForce 945M:
233.3 fps
33%
HD Graphics 505:
31.2 42.9 [X] Dell Latitude 3189 N002L318911EMEA Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
~ 37 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
49.2 70 ~ 60 fps
196%
GeForce 945M:
117.6 fps
33%
HD Graphics 505:
17.4 21.6 [X] Dell Latitude 3189 N002L318911EMEA Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
~ 20 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
33.3 46.4 ~ 40 fps
28%
HD Graphics 505:
11.2 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
20.6 fps
152%
GeForce 945M:
31.4 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
37.6 53.7 ~ 46 fps
186%
GeForce 945M:
85.7 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
27.6 32.2 ~ 30 fps
168%
GeForce 945M:
50.4 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
19.6 20 ~ 20 fps
170%
GeForce 945M:
33.9 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
6.6 fps
191%
GeForce 945M:
12.6 fps
HD Graphics 505:
35 36.7 ~ 36 fps
HD Graphics 505:
30.9 31 ~ 31 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
57 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
55 fps
100%
Iris Graphics 540:
24 fps
Average Gaming Intel Iris Graphics 540 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 945M → 202% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 203%
Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 505 → 28% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 35%
NVIDIA GeForce 945M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Fallout 4 54 33 18 15 Anno 2205 63.3 37.8 17.2 7.3 FIFA 16 201 103.7 69.3 World of Warships 130.2 113.7 65.6 43.7 Metal Gear Solid V 60 60 35.2 23.7 Mad Max 65.3 31.6 29.4 Batman: Arkham Knight 47 39 18 The Witcher 3 51.9 30.6 17 9.3 Dirt Rally 229 98.5 52.7 22.1 Battlefield Hardline 117.8 89.8 32.3 20.4 Evolve 59.9 36.8 20.9 18 Dragon Age: Inquisition 98.4 62 21.2 14 Far Cry 4 72.3 53 23.9 19.1 Assassin's Creed Unity 44.8 30.1 18.1 12.4 Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare 114.9 61 28.6 15.7 Alien: Isolation 130.2 85.9 43.7 30.2 Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 75.4 47.2 26.1 20 Sims 4 184 101.1 57.7 45.5 GRID: Autosport 198.7 118.8 68.5 33.2 Watch Dogs 65 53.2 19.4 13.7 Thief 71 44.7 37 18.5 Battlefield 4 111.9 78.3 54.4 21.6 Total War: Rome II 133 101 73 17 Metro: Last Light 81.5 66.7 38.6 18.8 BioShock Infinite 148.5 92.9 78.7 26.4 Tomb Raider 233.3 117.6 68 31.4 Crysis 3 85.7 50.4 33.9 12.6 The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim 50 48 40 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 5 12 9 12 15 11 11 6 20 6 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 15. 23:29:55
#0 checking url part for id 6472 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 6532 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 7542 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:35:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.129s ... 0.13s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.13s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.13s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6472 +0.052s ... 0.182s
#9 got single benchmarks 6472 +0.027s ... 0.209s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 6532 +0.017s ... 0.226s
#11 got single benchmarks 6532 +0.011s ... 0.238s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7542 +0.015s ... 0.253s
#13 got single benchmarks 7542 +0.055s ... 0.308s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.308s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.436s ... 0.743s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.744s
#17 Got 468 rows for game benchmarks. +0.036s ... 0.779s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.779s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.059s ... 0.838s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.197s ... 1.035s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 1.035s
#22 return log +0.003s ... 1.038s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)