Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U vs Intel Core i7-8550U

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2017. It combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. The TDP can be configured by the laptop manufacturer between 12 to 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal) and therefore the APU is also suited for thin and light laptops. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance of the Zen CPU cores should be better than a high end Kaby-Lake-Refresh Quad-Core CPU (e.g. the Core i7-8650U) according to AMD. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 2700U is suited for all applications.

Intel Core i7-8550U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8550U

The Intel Core i7-8550U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessors Core i7-7500U and i5-7260U, respectively, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8550U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.8 GHz. The Turbo Boost is not specified yet, but should be at least 3.7 - 4 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8550U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. This leads to big differences in our benchmark scores ranging from the 15 Watt reference by Intel up to the 23% higher score of the Inspiron 17-7773 in the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark. Especially when taxing the CPU for longer periods, these differences can be even higher.

In our usual benchmarks, the average i7-8550U is as fast as the 35 Watt rated Core i5-7440HQ. For single thread performance, the high Turbo Boost frequency helps achieving one of the highest scores for mobile CPUs.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 2700UIntel Core i7-8550U
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)Intel Kaby Lake Refresh
CodenameZenKaby Lake Refresh
Series: Kaby Lake Refresh Kaby Lake Refresh
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U « 2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U compare1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U « 1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U compare1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U compare1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Clock2200 - 3800 MHz1800 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketAM4BGA1356
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
$409 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 2700U
26.5 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8550U
28.1 pt (39%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3603 Points (3%)
2914 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
886 Points (38%)
1021 Points (43%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 347     avg: 361.3     median: 356 (40%)     max: 381 Points
min: 383     avg: 388.5     median: 388.5 (43%)     max: 394 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1392     avg: 1439     median: 1422 (3%)     max: 1504 Points
min: 1118     avg: 1128     median: 1128 (3%)     max: 1138 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 546     avg: 640     median: 644 (4%)     max: 719 Points
min: 301     avg: 576     median: 553 (3%)     max: 761 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 134     avg: 141.9     median: 143.5 (43%)     max: 150 Points
min: 108     avg: 159.5     median: 163 (49%)     max: 172 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.88     avg: 7     median: 7.5 (10%)     max: 7.66 Points
min: 4.38     avg: 6.3     median: 6.1 (8%)     max: 8.56 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.58     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (41%)     max: 1.71 Points
min: 1.43     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (47%)     max: 1.95 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4379     avg: 4474     median: 4515 (27%)     max: 4527 Points
min: 4202     avg: 6333     median: 6423 (39%)     max: 8211 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 9812     avg: 13528     median: 13729 (10%)     max: 17043 Points
min: 11694     avg: 17867     median: 17321.5 (13%)     max: 24180 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 12279     avg: 23153     median: 22717 (16%)     max: 31667 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 6737     avg: 8065     median: 8370.5 (10%)     max: 8436 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 268.1     avg: 269.1     median: 269.1 (3%)     max: 270.1 s
min: 257.5     avg: 352     median: 366.7 (4%)     max: 435 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 8.3     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (2%)     max: 8.8 s
min: 7.047     avg: 9.8     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 12.7 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
847 s (3%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
26.3 s (14%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3847     avg: 4487     median: 4374 (7%)     max: 5287 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
17317 MIPS (10%)
15613 MIPS (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3592 MIPS (43%)
4337 MIPS (52%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
36.4 fps (13%)
min: 32     avg: 35.3     median: 33.1 (12%)     max: 41 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
128 fps (30%)
min: 143.6     avg: 153.9     median: 147.9 (34%)     max: 178 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4 fps (7%)
min: 3.77     avg: 4     median: 3.9 (7%)     max: 4.43 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.357     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.469 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.583     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.793 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.3     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
713 Seconds (5%)
min: 841     avg: 897     median: 913 (6%)     max: 937 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (18%)
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5366     avg: 5838     median: 6072 (13%)     max: 6076 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.8 s (3%)
min: 9     avg: 10.5     median: 9.3 (2%)     max: 17.45 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.3 s (1%)
min: 20     avg: 23     median: 21.2 (1%)     max: 32.72 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
698 s (3%)
min: 510     avg: 575     median: 536 (2%)     max: 740 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 19828     avg: 20243     median: 20242.5 (18%)     max: 20657 Points
21623 Points (19%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3205     avg: 5438     median: 5445 (15%)     max: 6952 Points
min: 3961     avg: 6653     median: 6649 (18%)     max: 9527 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 33097     avg: 33808     median: 33808 (27%)     max: 34519 Points
min: 16314     avg: 42803     median: 44682 (36%)     max: 55226 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
33326 Points (27%)
min: 16312     avg: 37536     median: 36876 (30%)     max: 51937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 27944     avg: 29171     median: 28356.5 (24%)     max: 32027 Points
min: 27917     avg: 50269     median: 52842 (45%)     max: 58213 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4058     avg: 5240     median: 5232 (13%)     max: 7076 Points
min: 3437     avg: 5739     median: 5695 (14%)     max: 7725 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6059     avg: 8060     median: 7851 (14%)     max: 9911 Points
min: 3961     avg: 8228     median: 8306 (15%)     max: 11110 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2750     avg: 2868     median: 2868 (12%)     max: 2986 Points
min: 2463     avg: 2898     median: 2875 (12%)     max: 3865 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2969 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1081 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3141 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3357     avg: 3487     median: 3495 (35%)     max: 3610 Points
min: 4555     avg: 4858     median: 4900 (49%)     max: 4997 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5034     avg: 7595     median: 8582 (10%)     max: 9169 Points
min: 10869     avg: 14247     median: 15117 (17%)     max: 16294 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3331 Points (45%)
min: 4439     avg: 4686     median: 4699 (64%)     max: 4858 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8210 Points (20%)
min: 10747     avg: 13316     median: 13251 (32%)     max: 15294 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10423     avg: 11434     median: 11433.5 (20%)     max: 12444 Points
min: 8918     avg: 12315     median: 12327.5 (22%)     max: 14144 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3136     avg: 3249     median: 3248.5 (63%)     max: 3361 Points
min: 2471     avg: 3671     median: 3770 (74%)     max: 4020 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11637     avg: 12834     median: 12833.5 (20%)     max: 14030 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3784     avg: 3949     median: 3948.5 (59%)     max: 4113 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1193     avg: 1408     median: 1361 (2%)     max: 1686 ms
min: 877     avg: 1087     median: 1107 (1%)     max: 2114 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
217.4 ms (2%)
min: 63.2     avg: 80.3     median: 71.3 (1%)     max: 122.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 20231     avg: 25163     median: 26482 (24%)     max: 27727 Points
min: 17296     avg: 33448     median: 33496 (30%)     max: 42043 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
142 Points (30%)
182 Points (38%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.3     avg: 40.1     median: 33.7 (6%)     max: 61.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.2     avg: 38.1     median: 30.4 (6%)     max: 63.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 10.4     avg: 15.6     median: 17.3 (13%)     max: 17.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700U → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8550U → 113% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 04. 21:47:59

#0 checking url part for id 9314 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9208 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9314 +0.018s ... 0.05s

#7 got single benchmarks 9314 +0.039s ... 0.089s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9208 +0.014s ... 0.103s

#9 got single benchmarks 9208 +0.265s ... 0.368s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.368s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.345s ... 0.713s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.738s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)