Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8565U vs Intel Core i5-9300H

Intel Core i7-8565U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8565U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation that was announced in August 2018 (IFA). Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i7-8550U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i7-8565U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 4,6 GHz (versus 4 GHz of the i7-8550U) for a single core and 4.1 GHz (versus 3.7 GHz) of all cores (4.1 GHz for 2 cores). The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Compared to the slower Core i5-8265U and i3-8145U, the i7 supports Thermal Velocity Boost.

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same microarchitecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8565U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additional Turbo  clock speed can be made use of. It looks like Intel is promoting the i7 to be 3 - 11% faster than the previous i7-8550U, with Cinebench R15 Multi reaching 5% gains.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory, it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i5-9300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9300H

The Intel Core i5-9300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 Refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz (4 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-8300H from 2018, the 9300H is clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz CPU, +50 MHz GPU).

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Intel Core i5-9300H should perform similar as the older Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). The faster Coffee Lake CPUs, like the Core i7-8750H/9750H offers two additional cores and is therefore up to 50% faster in multithreaded benchmarks. Still, the performance of the i5-9300H should be sufficient for even demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i7-8565UIntel Core i5-9300H
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Coffee Lake
CodenameWhiskey Lake-UCoffee Lake-H
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i7-8665U compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8565U « 1.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4600 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1528FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
$250 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8565U
29.6 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9300H
30.2 pt (42%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 342     avg: 409.3     median: 411.5 (46%)     max: 472 Points
min: 398     avg: 415.2     median: 419 (47%)     max: 427 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 954     avg: 1257     median: 1181.5 (3%)     max: 1645 Points
min: 1530     avg: 1727     median: 1737 (4%)     max: 1877 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 452     avg: 612     median: 608.5 (4%)     max: 815 Points
min: 717     avg: 784     median: 790 (5%)     max: 850 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 138.3     avg: 172.5     median: 173 (52%)     max: 193 Points
min: 169     avg: 172.6     median: 172 (52%)     max: 176 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.09     avg: 6.3     median: 6.8 (9%)     max: 7.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.65     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (48%)     max: 2.16 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2682     avg: 6571     median: 6644 (40%)     max: 8906 Points
min: 6421     avg: 6561     median: 6572 (40%)     max: 6677 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 13806     avg: 17608     median: 16760 (12%)     max: 23118 Points
min: 21798     avg: 24198     median: 24623 (18%)     max: 25656 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 14542     avg: 21376     median: 21661 (15%)     max: 26851 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5474     avg: 8104     median: 8809.5 (11%)     max: 9435 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 263.3     avg: 353.4     median: 360.2 (4%)     max: 420 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.812     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (2%)     max: 12.41 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3537     avg: 4129     median: 4291.5 (7%)     max: 4626 Points
5663 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 10531     avg: 17993     median: 18860 (11%)     max: 24847 MIPS
min: 20736     avg: 22008     median: 22133 (13%)     max: 23155 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2029     avg: 4558     median: 4737 (57%)     max: 5923 MIPS
min: 4542     avg: 4592     median: 4609 (55%)     max: 4626 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 29.35     avg: 33.8     median: 33.7 (12%)     max: 38.8 fps
49.4 fps (17%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 127.5     avg: 144.4     median: 140.9 (33%)     max: 160.2 fps
193.7 fps (45%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.24     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (8%)     max: 5.5 fps
min: 5.7     avg: 6.1     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.347     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.516 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.567     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.869 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.2     avg: 4.2     median: 4 (10%)     max: 5.1 GB/s
4.7 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 687     avg: 821     median: 806.5 (6%)     max: 1175 Seconds
min: 588     avg: 611     median: 602 (4%)     max: 643 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.682     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.851 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2813     avg: 5806     median: 6158 (13%)     max: 7928 Points
min: 7787     avg: 8354     median: 8107 (17%)     max: 9169 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.286     avg: 8.5     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.889 s
9.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.9     avg: 19.3     median: 19 (1%)     max: 20.61 s
20.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 491.1     avg: 520     median: 508 (2%)     max: 583 s
496 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 16249     avg: 20521     median: 20544 (18%)     max: 25525 Points
26995 Points (24%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3083     avg: 6977     median: 6739 (18%)     max: 9422 Points
min: 7499     avg: 8987     median: 9107 (25%)     max: 10557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 18314     avg: 43687     median: 46109 (37%)     max: 58024 Points
min: 52412     avg: 55875     median: 56000 (46%)     max: 58466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 19795     avg: 41691     median: 40823 (33%)     max: 57796 Points
min: 49250     avg: 54277     median: 54947 (45%)     max: 58074 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 22018     avg: 45134     median: 49602 (42%)     max: 60319 Points
min: 58114     avg: 58963     median: 58413 (49%)     max: 61541 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2413     avg: 5785     median: 5756 (15%)     max: 8032 Points
min: 5356     avg: 7678     median: 7828.5 (20%)     max: 8903 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3409     avg: 8376     median: 8361 (15%)     max: 11865 Points
min: 9387     avg: 11376     median: 11698 (21%)     max: 12349 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1354     avg: 2953     median: 2841 (12%)     max: 3880 Points
min: 3165     avg: 4074     median: 4189 (18%)     max: 4861 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1108     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (48%)     max: 1163 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2839     avg: 3074     median: 3073.5 (6%)     max: 3308 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1103     avg: 1186     median: 1197 (5%)     max: 1229 Points
min: 1095     avg: 1118     median: 1123 (5%)     max: 1137 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2643     avg: 3228     median: 3176 (10%)     max: 3803 Points
min: 3697     avg: 4014     median: 4146 (13%)     max: 4200 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2357     avg: 5053     median: 5142.5 (51%)     max: 5547 Points
min: 4704     avg: 4898     median: 4901 (49%)     max: 5089 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8142     avg: 14179     median: 13888 (15%)     max: 16968 Points
min: 14853     avg: 16246     median: 16541 (18%)     max: 17684 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4701     avg: 4750     median: 4759 (65%)     max: 4791 Points
5266 Points (72%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11576     avg: 13367     median: 13617.5 (33%)     max: 14655 Points
16911 Points (41%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10521     avg: 12071     median: 12302.5 (22%)     max: 13703 Points
min: 14195     avg: 15338     median: 15527.5 (28%)     max: 16101 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3340     avg: 3882     median: 3851 (75%)     max: 4820 Points
min: 3596     avg: 3854     median: 3854.5 (75%)     max: 4109 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11720     avg: 12845     median: 12844.5 (20%)     max: 13969 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4276     avg: 4294     median: 4294 (64%)     max: 4312 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 10320     avg: 10618     median: 10617.5 (86%)     max: 10915 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 7885     avg: 8316     median: 8315.5 (75%)     max: 8746 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 11135     avg: 11197     median: 11196.5 (22%)     max: 11258 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 10347     avg: 11305     median: 11305 (23%)     max: 12263 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 10402     avg: 10600     median: 10600 (28%)     max: 10798 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 730     avg: 1096     median: 1066 (1%)     max: 2622 ms
min: 1079     avg: 1138     median: 1108.5 (1%)     max: 1349 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 80.7     avg: 153.6     median: 152.7 (2%)     max: 228.3 ms
86.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 13935     avg: 34603     median: 34884.5 (31%)     max: 49795 Points
min: 22225     avg: 32344     median: 33646 (30%)     max: 34957 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 176     avg: 208.4     median: 202 (42%)     max: 239 Points
222 Points (46%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8565U → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9300H → 118% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 07:27:28

#0 checking url part for id 10082 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11356 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10082 +0.022s ... 0.056s

#7 got single benchmarks 10082 +0.233s ... 0.289s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11356 +0.016s ... 0.305s

#9 got single benchmarks 11356 +0.074s ... 0.379s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.379s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.402s ... 0.781s

#12 return log +0.026s ... 0.807s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)