Notebookcheck

Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor Benchmarked

Florian Glaser (translated by Martina Osztovits), 10/07/2014

GPU glutton. In Shadow of Mordor, Sauron does not aim for the ring but primarily goes for video memory. We tried to determine the hardware requirements. Do you really need a lightning fast high-end system?

Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a loyal reader of notebookcheck? Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Especially wanted:
News Editor, Review Editor
(Smartphones) - Details here

For the original German article, see here.

Technology

How much video memory does a graphics card require? This question is raised when buying the brand new scion of the Lord of the Rings universe. While 1 to 2 GB VRAM is sufficient for most games, 6 GB is recommended for Middle-earth. In 2014, a few other games (Watch Dogs & Wolfenstein: The New Order require 3 GB at ultra settings) also require more than 2 GB with maximum details. However, the requirements of Shadow of Mordor are definitely exorbitant.

In view of the graphics quality, you might sooner or later suspect that Monolith (F.E.A.R., Tron 2.0, Aliens vs. Predator 2, No One Lives Forever...) was a bit lazy when optimizing their LithTech Jupiter EX Engine; at least at the PC. While most of the textures are razor-sharp and the technology is better than the competition's in many aspects (simulation of cloth), this does not justify such high video memory requirements. Shadow of Mordor looks good, yet not outstanding. Apart from facial expressions, polygon count and quality of effects should also be improved in some scenes.

HD textures: step I
HD textures: step I
HD textures: step II
HD textures: step II
HD textures: step III
HD textures: step III

Let's return to the topic: If you want to enjoy Middle-earth in all its glory, you have to manually download and install the texture package via Steam first (see screenshots). If you skip this, only high textures are used with ultra settings and image errors might occur.

Our tests proved that 6 GB VRAM is not absolutely necessary for maximum graphics options, but, with less memory, you'll face stuttering and slowdowns, which have a big, negative effect on the gaming experience. Previous to the launch of the GeForce 900 generation, only the top models of the GeForce GTX 870M (6 GB) and the GeForce GTX 880M (8 GB) could meet the high memory requirements in the notebook range. This gets especially apparent in the minimum fps. Instead of 26 fps, the predecessor of the GTX 870M only reached 11 fps (GTX 770M @ 3 GB) at ultra settings. Likewise, the GTX 780M with 4 GB VRAM stuttered more than its counterpart of the 800 series. While the performance was comparable otherwise, the minimum fps were more than 50% lower (13 vs. 30 fps).

Since the texture quality at ultra settings hardly differs from high settings, we would recommend omitting the HD package and playing with the (very) high presetting if possible. In dropping ultra textures, not only the average fps will increase, but especially the minimum fps.

Not only the video memory requirements raised discussion in advance, the CPU requirements did too. According to Monolith, you'll require a quad-core CPU. Don't panic: Reasonably powerful dual-core models like the Core i5-4340M are sufficiently fast. However, a lot of storage is required. Shadow of Mordor with high-res textures (~4 GB) occupies over 40 GB on the hard drive.

Low Settings
Low Settings
Medium Settings
Medium Settings
High Settings
High Settings
Ultra Settings
Ultra Settings

Otherwise, you can hardly complain about the technical implementation. The enhanced options menu brings more than 10 options. Apart from Ambient Occlusion, the DirectX 11 engine also supports other "graphical gems" like tessellation. The video menu allows changing the resolution, configuring the display mode, and activating vertical sync. In addition, not every game allows limiting the frame rate. Unfortunately, Shadow of Mordor requires being restarted after specific changes. This would not be a problem if you could skip the intro video. It is also annoying that Monolith did not implement anti-aliasing. Jagged edges are an issue in Middle-earth - see "overhead wiring" in the video.

Low Settings
Low Settings
Medium Settings
Medium Settings
High Settings
High Settings
Ultra Settings
Ultra Settings
Low Settings
Low Settings
Medium Settings
Medium Settings
High Settings
High Settings
Ultra Settings
Ultra Settings

Furthermore, the following things are notable:

  • While Nvidia platforms deliver rather constant frame rates, they partly fluctuate extremely in AMD systems. This gets especially apparent in the diagram of the integrated benchmark.
  • In general, the minimum fps varies greatly - regardless whether run on an Nvidia or AMD platform. The minimum is usually higher in the second benchmark run.
  • Weaker AMD processors often falter.
  • Only low to medium details are possible with Intel HD Graphics 4600. The game crashes with "high" setting and above.
  • With low to very high setting, the performance is hardly different with or without HD texture package (tested with GeForce GTX 780 Ti).
  • The options menu only displays the Intel chip instead of the Radeon in AMD notebooks with Enduro graphics switch. Nevertheless, the settings can be configured as usual.
  • It seems that the integrated benchmark starts recording a few seconds too early. In any case, the maximum fps is much too high.
  • In contrast to the other options, the "graphical quality" is not changed after restarting the settings. Restarting again helps here.

Benchmark

As already mentioned, we used the integrated benchmark for our measurement, which can be directly run from the option menu. Although it is not particularly representative for the real game (frame rate reduction due to VRAM overflow), we decided to use this sequence, which takes just under 40 seconds, because of comfort and identical passes. It would also be hard to recommend hardware for specific settings based on a "real" in-game benchmark. This would require a more constant performance of the game. So, the GPUs listed below are only a rough estimation based on minimum and average fps of the benchmark.

Results

Those only owning a cheap office or multimedia notebook can save about 50 Euros (~$63) due for the game. Neither the HD Graphics 4000/4600 nor mid-range chips like the GeForce GT 740M can handle it. At least a GeForce GT 750M is required to smoothly run the game with a resolution of 1280x720 pixels and "lowest" level. Not less than a GeForce GTX 850M or GTX 765M are necessary for 1366x768 pixels and normal settings. The high presetting and 1920x1080 pixels only run adequately on a top GPU. Both the Radeon R9 M290X and the GeForce GTX 870M achieve an average of above 50 fps. You should not use the ultra presetting because of the reasons mentioned above.

Discussion
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
    1280x720 Lowest Preset     1344x756 Medium Preset     1920x1080 High Preset     1920x1080 Ultra Preset (HD Package)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti, 3770K
Desktop-PC
225.8 (min: 108) fps ∼84%
194.9 (min: 88) fps ∼93%
112.3 (min: 73) fps ∼60%
88 (min: 20) fps ∼55%
Radeon R9 290X, 2600K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
Sapphire Tri-X R9 290X Desktop
113 (min: 46) fps ∼61%
78 (min: 31) fps ∼48%
Radeon R9 280X, 3770K
Desktop-PC
198.2 (min: 105) fps ∼74%
156.4 (min: 42) fps ∼75%
70.7 (min: 29) fps ∼38%
51.3 (min: 16) fps ∼32%
GeForce GTX 880M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
177.6 (min: 80) fps ∼66%
108.9 (min: 59) fps ∼52%
63 (min: 38) fps ∼34%
48.3 (min: 30) fps ∼30%
GeForce GTX 780M, 4700MQ
Schenker W503
161.6 (min: 75) fps ∼60%
99.8 (min: 56) fps ∼48%
57.2 (min: 34) fps ∼31%
44.1 (min: 13) fps ∼27%
GeForce GTX 870M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
142 (min: 70) fps ∼53%
84.9 (min: 52) fps ∼41%
50.2 (min: 33) fps ∼27%
38.9 (min: 26) fps ∼24%
GeForce GTX 760, 3770K
Desktop-PC
167.6 (min: 102) fps ∼62%
102.8 (min: 56) fps ∼49%
61.3 (min: 41) fps ∼33%
37.4 (min: 9) fps ∼23%
Radeon R9 M290X, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
151 (min: 84) fps ∼56%
102.8 (min: 50) fps ∼49%
50.8 (min: 30) fps ∼27%
37.1 (min: 10) fps ∼23%
GeForce GTX 770M, 4700MQ
Schenker W503
110.8 (min: 51) fps ∼41%
66.2 (min: 40) fps ∼32%
38.8 (min: 25) fps ∼21%
29.8 (min: 11) fps ∼19%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3770K
Desktop-PC
126.4 (min: 82) fps ∼47%
76.4 (min: 46) fps ∼36%
43.4 (min: 31) fps ∼23%
29.2 (min: 8) fps ∼18%
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
99.3 (min: 62) fps ∼37%
61.8 (min: 40) fps ∼30%
34.7 (min: 25) fps ∼19%
26.4 (min: 12) fps ∼16%
GeForce GTX 850M, 4340M
Schenker M504
78.4 (min: 51) fps ∼29%
54.2 (min: 27) fps ∼26%
23.5 (min: 15) fps ∼13%
17.2 (min: 4) fps ∼11%
GeForce GTX 765M, 4700MQ
Schenker W503
80.5 (min: 56) fps ∼30%
51.5 (min: 33) fps ∼25%
28.6 (min: 20) fps ∼15%
16.4 (min: 6) fps ∼10%
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop), A10-7850K, Samsung SSD 470 Series MZ-5PA256/EU
A10-7850K Asus A88-XM-PLUS
41 (min: 18) fps ∼15%
28.5 (min: 13) fps ∼14%
17 (min: 9) fps ∼9%
12.4 (min: 4) fps ∼8%
GeForce GT 750M, 4702MQ
Schenker M503
47.1 (min: 34) fps ∼18%
29.7 (min: 16) fps ∼14%
16.7 (min: 12) fps ∼9%
11.6 (min: 3) fps ∼7%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200, 4750HQ, Intel SSD 525 Series SSDMCEAC180B3
Schenker S413
44 (min: 22) fps ∼16%
29 (min: 14) fps ∼14%
16.4 (min: 6) fps ∼9%
0 fps ∼0%
GeForce GT 640M, 2637M, Lite-On LMT-256M3M
Acer Aspire M3-581TG
38.4 (min: 24) fps ∼14%
25 (min: 12) fps ∼12%
14.5 (min: 8) fps ∼8%
10 (min: 1) fps ∼6%
GeForce GT 740M, 4200M
HP Envy 15-j011sg
30.4 (min: 20) fps ∼11%
19.3 (min: 12) fps ∼9%
10.6 (min: 8) fps ∼6%
7.9 (min: 2) fps ∼5%
GeForce GT 720M, 4200M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
MSI CX61-i572M
25.6 fps ∼10%
15.2 fps ∼7%
8.7 fps ∼5%
5.7 fps ∼4%
GeForce GT 630M, 3720QM, Seagate Momentus 7200.5 ST9750420AS
Asus N56VM
26 (min: 12) fps ∼10%
15 (min: 10) fps ∼7%
Iris Graphics 5100, 4258U, Apple SSD SM0256F
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10
25 (min: 20) fps ∼9%
17.3 (min: 12) fps ∼8%
9.5 (min: 5) fps ∼5%
0 fps ∼0%
HD Graphics 4600, 4700MQ
Schenker W503
26.8 (min: 17) fps ∼10%
17.4 (min: 9) fps ∼8%
Radeon HD 8650G, A10-5750M, Samsung SSD 470 Series MZ-5PA256/EU
Pumori Test Platform (A10-5750M)
17.3 (min: 8) fps ∼6%
HD Graphics 4000, 3720QM
Asus N56VM
13 (min: 8) fps ∼5%

Test systems

Four of our test models stem from Schenker Technologies (mysn.de):

  • W504 (Core i7-4700MQ, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GTX 860M, GTX 870M, GTX 880M, Radeon R9 M290X)
  • W503 (Core i7-4700MQ, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GTX 765M, GTX 770M, GTX 780M)
  • M504 (Core i5-4340M, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GTX 850M)
  • M503 (Core i7-4702MQ, 8 GB DDR3, GeForce GT 750M)

All of these used Windows 7 64-bit as operating system. Thanks to Micron for providing us with a 480 GB Crucial M500.

Nvidia provided us with another test system:

  • HP Envy 15-j011sg (Core i5-4200M, 12 GB DDR3, GeForce GT 740M)

Used GPU driver: Nvidia 344.11, AMD 14.9, Intel 10.18.10.3907

In addition, there are benchmarks from other notebooks with probably different drivers.

Overview

Show Restrictions
Pos      Model                                     Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
 Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
low
1280x720
Lowest Preset
med.
1344x756
Medium Preset
high
1920x1080
High Preset
ultra
1920x1080
Ultra Preset (HD Package)
 2NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Notebook)
227.8
203
186.1
160.9
 5NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI
187.4
176.5
148
116.4
 6AMD Radeon R9 Fury
255
205
134
103
 7NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
218.7
193.3
110.1
89.452
 8NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Notebook)
2302
194.82
121.23
91.45
 10AMD Radeon R9 390X
209.8
144.8
94.5
 11NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI
268.9
209.4
119.352
98.22
 12NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
225.8
194.9
112.3
88
 13NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
238.4
186.9
100.8
76.9
 16AMD Radeon R9 290X
244
196
113.52
84.52
 18NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
89.5
69.2
 23NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
191.24
155.254
88.79
67.79
 24NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
191.92
150.12
87.72
65.82
 25AMD Radeon R9 280X
198.2
156.4
70.7
51.3
 26AMD Radeon R9 380
203.9
82.8
61.6
 27NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
194.7
131.8
71.8
48.6
 28NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
1705
125.37
68.612
51.812
 37AMD Radeon R9 M295X
131.9
94.8
58
44.6
 39*AMD FirePro W7170M
177
126
70
52
Pos      Model                                     Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
lowmed.highultra
 41AMD Radeon R7 370
181.5
111.99
64.62
47.44
 43NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
177.6
108.9
63
48.3
 44NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
174.3
110
60.1
40.3
 47NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
167.6
102.8
61.3
37.4
 48NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
161.6
99.8
57.2
44.1
 49NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
125.9
84.2
45.7
35.8
 52NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
129.43
92.33
48.73
29.33
 53*NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
200
125
68
54
 54NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
142
84.9
50.2
38.9
 55AMD Radeon R9 M290X
151
102.8
50.8
37.1
 65*AMD Radeon R9 M390
154
92
53
39
 66NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
126.4
76.4
43.4
29.2
 70NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
1273
80.156
41.7612
30.312
 74NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
110.8
66.2
38.8
29.8
 75NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
95.852
61.552
34.952
18.052
 83NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
80.852
54.754
28.454
20.64
 84NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
76.462
53.33
23.83
18.153
 85NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
169
131
34
26
 86AMD Radeon R9 M280X
48.1
32.2
18.5
 91NVIDIA GeForce 945M
75.4
47.2
26.1
20
Pos      Model                                     Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
lowmed.highultra
 92NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
80.5
51.5
28.6
16.4
 103*AMD Radeon R9 M385X
60.3
51.2
37.8
27.5
 114NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
77.8
49.4
27.5
21.8
 133NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
67
34
17
16
 141NVIDIA GeForce 845M
58.4
41.2
22.4
 144AMD Radeon R9 M265X
49.5
20
14.18
 150AMD FirePro W4100
50
33
18
17
 155NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
47.1
29.7
16.7
11.6
 157NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
39.8
25
13.8
9.4
 158NVIDIA GeForce 940M
392
252
13.052
 159AMD Radeon R9 M375
36
25.5
15.5
 162AMD Radeon R7 M370
37.4
27.8
15.7
11.7
 166NVIDIA GeForce 840M
38.742
24.12
13.712
6.6
 167AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
40.7
32.4
23
10
 171AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
41
28.5
17
12.4
 172Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
44
29
16.4
 173*AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
27.72
17.752
102
7.2
 174AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
44
28.1
14.8
10.4
 175NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
30.4
19.3
10.6
7.9
 176NVIDIA GeForce 930M
38.152
24.22
Pos      Model                                     Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
lowmed.highultra
 178NVIDIA GeForce 830M
36.6
23.2
12.8
9.5
 195AMD Radeon R7 M260X
45
27.2
15.5
4.1
 205AMD Radeon R7 M270
35.052
22.252
13.12
102
 206AMD Radeon R7 M265
31.3
24.1
11.9
 210NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
38.4
25
14.5
10
 211AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri)
28.3
20
11.6
 212AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
36.2
26.6
15.1
 216AMD Radeon R7 M360
29.92
18.52
10.152
6.3
 225AMD Radeon R7 M340
29.4
19.6
10.9
8.1
 226NVIDIA GeForce 920M
29.62
18.952
10.12
6.452
 228Intel HD Graphics 530
32.952
22.5
112
8.5
 231AMD Radeon R7 M260
25.9
17.3
9.7
 253AMD FirePro W2100
35
21
12
 263Intel HD Graphics 5600
32
19.9
10.5
8.3
 269AMD Radeon HD 8670M
23.4
15.5
8
 270AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
32.5
22.2
13.9
12
 289AMD Radeon HD 8650G
17.3
 294NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
26
15
 297AMD Radeon R5 M335
21.5
14.5
8.1
6.3
 299AMD Radeon R5 M330
21.7
15.25
Pos      Model                                     Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
lowmed.highultra
 300AMD Radeon R5 M255
30.7
19.6
10.6
 302NVIDIA GeForce 820M
26.652
17.052
8.82
6.7
 303Intel HD Graphics 520
29.32
18.62
9.852
 304Intel Iris Graphics 6100
27.8
18.6
10.8
8.6
 305NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
25.6
15.2
8.7
5.7
 307AMD Radeon R5 M240
25.5
16.9
 309AMD Radeon R5 M230
19.1
13.9
6.9
 318Intel Iris Graphics 5100
25
17.3
9.5
 323Intel HD Graphics 4600
22.42
14.72
 325Intel HD Graphics 5500
18.85
12.55
6.85
4.93
 334Intel HD Graphics 5000
20.1
13
7.2
 350AMD Radeon HD 8550G
28
18
 367Intel HD Graphics 4400
16.84
10.484
6.52
3.1
 397Intel HD Graphics 5300
15.434
8.64
53
 406Intel HD Graphics 4000
13
 412AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
15.4
9.7
5.3
 413AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
14.2
10
 414Intel HD Graphics 4200
12.412
8.43
3.72
 439AMD Radeon HD 8350G
18
 440AMD Radeon HD 8330
12.7
7.7
Pos      Model                                     Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
lowmed.highultra
 443AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
14.7
9
 469Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
13.5
8.3
 569Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
8.5
6.1
* Smaller values are better. / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
123Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.
Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment this article:
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor Benchmarked
Florian Glaser, 2014-10- 7 (Update: 2016-02-18)