Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-14900K vs Intel Core i9-14900HX

Intel Core i9-14900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900K

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a high-end processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, similar to the Intel Core i9-13900K last year. The base clock is 3.2 GHz and can reach up to 6 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 32 threads are still divided into 8 P and 16 E cores. The 8 performance cores (P-cores) also offer hyperthreading, which means that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously in conjunction with the 16 energy-efficient E-cores. As before, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the same CPU socket (LGA 1700) as the Intel Core i9-13900K. This means you don't necessarily need a new motherboard, as the 600 series chipsets support the new processors after a BIOS update. There is also still the option of using DDR4 for the RAM.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Core i9-14900K still offers 8 P-cores, which are relieved by 16 additional E-cores for demanding applications and thus ensure very high multi-thread performance. In comparison, however, the Intel Core i9-14900K can only gain a slight lead. The e-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Meanwhile, the IPC could only be increased slightly. As an innovation with the Intel Core i9-14900K, the manufacturer is increasingly relying on AI, which is also used for overclocking. With one click in the Intel Extreme Utility, the tool checks the entire system and makes the necessary settings.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Intel Core i9-14900K offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The Intel Core i9-14900K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires very good cooling. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the specified power consumption does not increase if the limits are adhered to. The situation is different if the limits are deactivated. As this value depends on the overall system, we cannot make an exact statement on this.

Intel Core i9-14900HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900HX

The Intel Core i9-14900HX is a high-end CPU based on the Raptor Lake architecture for large and heavy notebooks. The CPU was introduced at the beginning of 2024 and is a slightly higher clocked variant of the older Core i9-13980HX.

The total of 32 threads are divided into P-cores and E-cores, which we already know from Alder-Lake. Here, 8 performance cores (P-cores) with hyperthreading are used and 16 efficiency cores, so that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously. The P-cores clock from 2.2 GHz (base clock) to 5.8 GHz (single-core turbo) and the E-cores from 1.6 GHz to 4.1 GHz.

Performance

Due to the slightly higher maximum clock rates, the single-core performance of the 14900HX in particular increases slightly compared to the 13980HX. Compared to AMD's top model, the Ryzen 9 7945HX or 7945HX3D the 14900HX comes in just behind (on average in our benchmarks). However, the performance depends on the benchmark and the cooling and is usually very comparable.

Graphics

Like the Intel Core i9-12900HX, the Intel Core i9-14900HX offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris XE architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

The 14900HX is manufactured on the improved 10nm FinFET process at Intel (Intel 7 process) and is specified with 55 watts of base power and 157 watts of turbo power.

show full text
ModelIntel Core i9-14900KIntel Core i9-14900HX
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake-HX Refresh
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-RIntel Raptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Intel Core i9-14900K « 3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 compare2 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700 compare1.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 compare2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T compare1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900HX « 1.6 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700HX compare3.9 - 5.5 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14650HX compare1.6 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500HX compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14450HX compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3200 - 6000 MHz1600 - 5800 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB32 MB
L3 Cache36 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 6.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core		24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.1 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP125 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700BGA1964
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$589 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
TDP Turbo PL2157 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900K
51.1 pt (85%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
48.1 -6%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
48.2 -6%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
48.4 -5%
Intel Core i9-13900K
49 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
49.1 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
49.5 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
49.9 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50.1 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
50.4 -1%
Intel Core i9-14900K
51.1
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
51.5 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
52 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
52.1 2%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 18%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900HX
46.6 pt (78%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
45.1 -3%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.1 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
45.5 -2%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
46.1 -1%
Intel Core i7-13700K
46.1 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
46.1 -1%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.6
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
46.8 0%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
46.9 1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
46.9 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
47.2 1%
Intel Core i9-14900
47.2 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
47.3 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 2%
Intel Core i7-14700K
47.5 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
48.1 3%
...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 29%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 134     avg: 136.5     median: 137 (69%)     max: 138 Points
min: 118.8     avg: 127.2     median: 128.5 (64%)     max: 131.7 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 2112     avg: 2189     median: 2146.5 (40%)     max: 2352 Points
min: 817     avg: 1544     median: 1592 (30%)     max: 2071 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 37606     avg: 39400     median: 39399.5 (37%)     max: 41193 Points
min: 17078     avg: 28872     median: 30055 (28%)     max: 36249 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2174     avg: 2263     median: 2262.5 (92%)     max: 2351 Points
min: 1720     avg: 2150     median: 2181.5 (89%)     max: 2245 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
900 Points (98%)
min: 657     avg: 825     median: 833.5 (91%)     max: 859 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
15466 Points (38%)
min: 6579     avg: 10958     median: 11419 (28%)     max: 13832 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5924     avg: 6103     median: 6103 (39%)     max: 6282 Points
min: 3263     avg: 4437     median: 4574 (29%)     max: 5589 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 317     avg: 324.5     median: 324.5 (90%)     max: 332 Points
min: 247     avg: 305.2     median: 310.5 (86%)     max: 323 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
72.2 Points (93%)
min: 40.14     avg: 43.8     median: 43.8 (57%)     max: 47.36 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 4.02     avg: 4     median: 4 (95%)     max: 4.21 Points
min: 3.45     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (83%)     max: 3.54 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12643 Points (76%)
min: 11078     avg: 11120     median: 11120 (67%)     max: 11162 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
94801 Points (69%)
min: 63617     avg: 67898     median: 67897.5 (49%)     max: 72178 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
144156 Points (92%)
min: 95056     avg: 98368     median: 98367.5 (63%)     max: 101679 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
18511 Points (23%)
min: 16204     avg: 16337     median: 16336.5 (20%)     max: 16469 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
74.5 s (1%)
min: 104.117     avg: 160     median: 160 (2%)     max: 215.805 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.1 s (0%)
min: 2.806     avg: 3     median: 3 (1%)     max: 3.126 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16108 Points (26%)
min: 10376     avg: 10937     median: 10936.5 (17%)     max: 11497 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 145144     avg: 146282     median: 145207 (83%)     max: 149570 MIPS
min: 66769     avg: 111970     median: 115640 (66%)     max: 136645 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7772     avg: 7893     median: 7932 (93%)     max: 7934 MIPS
min: 5452     avg: 7056     median: 7151.5 (84%)     max: 7545 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 75.9     avg: 181.2     median: 181.2 (5%)     max: 286.5 fps
min: 152.7     avg: 176.6     median: 176.6 (4%)     max: 200.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 257.5     avg: 345.5     median: 345.5 (9%)     max: 433.5 fps
min: 337     avg: 350     median: 350 (9%)     max: 363 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 40.8     avg: 41.4     median: 41.1 (72%)     max: 42.8 fps
min: 16.8     avg: 29.3     median: 30.1 (53%)     max: 38.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.8 GB/s (82%)
min: 1.6     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (51%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
5.8 GB/s (100%)
min: 3.2     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (61%)     max: 3.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
26.7 GB/s (70%)
min: 16.4     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (43%)     max: 16.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 135     avg: 143     median: 144.5 (2%)     max: 147 Seconds
min: 155     avg: 215.1     median: 205 (3%)     max: 394 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 87 Seconds
min: 91     avg: 121     median: 113 (1%)     max: 206 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3425     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.3504 sec
min: 0.3604     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.4859 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 20532     avg: 22354     median: 22657.5 (48%)     max: 22928 Points
min: 14839     avg: 18676     median: 19451 (41%)     max: 20788 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
5.5 s (1%)
min: 5.837     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (1%)     max: 5.928 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
12 s (1%)
min: 12.965     avg: 13.2     median: 13.1 (1%)     max: 13.328 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
280.3 s (1%)
min: 305.103     avg: 308.5     median: 308.5 (1%)     max: 311.83 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 11403     avg: 101267     median: 111512 (86%)     max: 114209 Points
min: 81852     avg: 81973     median: 81973 (63%)     max: 82094 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 28497     avg: 31204     median: 31391 (77%)     max: 32853 Points
min: 16205     avg: 23321     median: 24017 (59%)     max: 29134 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 89084     avg: 104553     median: 105332 (86%)     max: 111347 Points
min: 92914     avg: 97333     median: 97111.5 (79%)     max: 102194 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 88682     avg: 104672     median: 105402 (86%)     max: 110989 Points
min: 86115     avg: 95301     median: 94260 (76%)     max: 101593 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 90865     avg: 104818     median: 105098 (84%)     max: 110670 Points
min: 94081     avg: 98844     median: 99882 (80%)     max: 102469 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 27678     avg: 28978     median: 29112 (74%)     max: 30462 Points
min: 16565     avg: 21102     median: 22007.5 (56%)     max: 24768 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 48193     avg: 52035     median: 52265 (93%)     max: 56087 Points
min: 11759     avg: 37541     median: 38821 (69%)     max: 46710 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 19418     avg: 22322     median: 22607.5 (95%)     max: 23721 Points
min: 12191     avg: 16418     median: 16783 (71%)     max: 18847 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 3108     avg: 3214     median: 3243 (75%)     max: 3294 Points
min: 2419     avg: 2966     median: 3013 (70%)     max: 3129 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 20435     avg: 21326     median: 21397 (83%)     max: 21790 Points
min: 13158     avg: 17401     median: 17606.5 (68%)     max: 19665 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2985     avg: 3078     median: 3104 (99%)     max: 3150 Points
min: 2694     avg: 2884     median: 2927 (93%)     max: 2977 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 19463     avg: 20452     median: 20693 (85%)     max: 20754 Points
min: 15218     avg: 16836     median: 16889 (69%)     max: 18016 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2243     avg: 2347     median: 2369 (80%)     max: 2370 Points
min: 1669     avg: 2092     median: 2123.5 (71%)     max: 2210 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24552     avg: 25148     median: 25199 (45%)     max: 25867 Points
min: 8618     avg: 19527     median: 20002 (36%)     max: 23194 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2177     avg: 2237     median: 2247 (10%)     max: 2280 Points
min: 1929     avg: 2037     median: 2050.5 (9%)     max: 2117 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23151     avg: 24582     median: 24467 (77%)     max: 25496 Points
min: 16611     avg: 19035     median: 18175.5 (57%)     max: 23176 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9620     avg: 9873     median: 9872.5 (99%)     max: 10009 Points
min: 8705     avg: 8875     median: 8874.5 (89%)     max: 9044 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 82660     avg: 87853     median: 88108.5 (86%)     max: 91119 Points
min: 58418     avg: 60787     median: 60787 (60%)     max: 63156 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 413     avg: 415     median: 414 (0%)     max: 418 ms
min: 428     avg: 448.6     median: 443 (1%)     max: 535 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 104490     avg: 109643     median: 109502 (72%)     max: 115768 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 332     avg: 334.7     median: 334 (87%)     max: 338 Points
min: 246     avg: 300.7     median: 303 (79%)     max: 321 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 371     avg: 388.3     median: 386 (69%)     max: 410 Points
min: 269     avg: 324.4     median: 327 (59%)     max: 345 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2490     avg: 2566     median: 2584 (97%)     max: 2611 Points
min: 1877     avg: 2148     median: 2162 (81%)     max: 2344 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
537 Watt (93%)
min: 73.6     avg: 170     median: 173.1 (30%)     max: 318 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
548 Watt (100%)
min: 121.8     avg: 216.7     median: 219 (40%)     max: 301 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 64.1     avg: 83.6     median: 77.6 (51%)     max: 151.2 Watt
min: 8.59     avg: 24.9     median: 26.8 (18%)     max: 35.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 9.03     avg: 19.7     median: 18.1 (13%)     max: 35.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
11.5 Points per Watt (9%)
min: 16     avg: 21.4     median: 20.8 (15%)     max: 27.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900K → 100% n=54

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900HX → 81% n=54

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 06. 17:30:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15092 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17163 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767717053s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 06 Jan 2026 15:10:37 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15092 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 15092 +0.051s ... 0.061s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17163 +0.005s ... 0.066s

#10 got single benchmarks 17163 +0.041s ... 0.107s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.085s ... 0.192s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.194s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)