Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 vs Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel UHD Graphics 605 ► remove from comparison
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is an integrated processor graphics unit from the Gemini Lake generation (e. g. Pentium Silver N5000), which was announced late 2017. The GPU can convince with low consumption figures, but the performance is only in the low-end segment and is rarely sufficient for modern games. Being the maximum configuration of the Gemini Lake GPU, the UHD Graphics 605 is equipped with 18 Execution Units (EUs) running at up to 750 MHz. The technical specifications of the GPU are based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which is also used for the more expensive Skylake series and also in the predecessor HD Graphics 505.
Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the UHD 605 has to access the main memory via processor (2x 64bit DDR4/LPDDR4-2400).
Performance
The UHD Graphics 605 offers a similar performance as the Intel HD Graphics 505 in the Apollo Lake SoCs (same Gen 9 architecture). Therefore, the GPU is only suited for some very low demanding games like Dirt Rally or Sims 4.
Features
The video engine decodes H.265/HEVC (8b and 10b) and VP9 completely in hardware. Up to three displays can be connected via DP 1.2a/eDP 1.3 or HDMI 2.0a (including HDCP 2.2).
Power Consumption
The TDP of the whole Pentium Silver N5000 chip is 6 Watts by default, so the GPU is primarily used for (often passively cooled) netbooks or thin notebooks. The TDP can also be reduced to 4.9 Watts, but this will obviously affect the performance.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 ► remove from comparison
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 is an integrated GPU for notebooks. It is used for the Ryzen 5 APUs, which were launched in the end of 2019. The GPU is based on the Vega architecture (5th generation GCN) and has 9 CUs (= 576 of the 704 shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz (Ryzen 5 3580U). The performance depends on the configured TDP (12-25 W at launch), the clocks, the cooling, and the memory configuration). The GPU should benefit from fast dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM (contrary to DDR4-2133 single-channel, which is also possible).
The Vega architecture offers some improvements over the Polaris generation and now supports DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1. More information is available in our dedicated article about the Raven Ridge architecture .
The performance of the integrated graphics card should be between the Vega 8 and Vega 10 . Therefore, demanding games like Control or Borderlands 3 should be playable in lowest settings and 720p. Less demanding games like Fifa 20 or League of Legends can be played fluently in 1080p and highest settings. See e.g. our Vega 8 page for additional benchmarks.
Thanks to the 14nm process and clever power-saving features, the power consumption is comparatively low (according to AMD), so the graphics card can also be used for slim and light notebooks.
Intel HD Graphics 500 ► remove from comparison
The Intel HD Graphics 500 is an integrated processor graphics unit from the Apollo Lake generation (e. g. Celeron N3450 and Celeron N3350), which was announced mid 2016. The GPU can convince with low consumption figures, but the performance is only in the low-end segment and is rarely sufficient for modern games. Being a partial configuration of the Apollo Lake GPU, the HD Graphics 505 is equipped with just 12 Execution Units (EUs) (HD Graphics 505: 18 EUs) running at up to 650-700 MHz depending on the model. The technical specifications of the GPU are based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which is also used for the more expensive Skylake series.
Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 505 has to access the main memory via processor (2x 64bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).
Performance
The HD Graphics 505 should be slightly slower than the older Broadwell GPU HD Graphics (Broadwell) , so modern games (as of 2016) will rarely run smoothly even at the lowest settings.
Features
The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Up to three displays can be connected via DP/eDP or HDMI (4K probably only at 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).
Power Consumption
The TDP of the whole Pentium N4200 chip is 6 Watts by default, so the GPU is primarily used for (often passively cooled) netbooks or thin notebooks. The TDP can also be reduced to 4 Watts, but this will obviously affect the performance.
Intel UHD Graphics 605 AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 Intel HD Graphics 500 Gen. 9 Series Codename Gemini Lake Vega Raven Ridge Apollo Lake Architecture Gen. 9 Apollo Lake Vega Gen. 9 Apollo Lake Pipelines 18 - unified 576 - unified 12 - unified Core Speed 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz 1300 (Boost) MHz 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz Memory Bus Width 64/128 Bit 64/128 Bit Memory Type DDR4 / LPDDR4 Shared Memory yes no yes API DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4 DirectX 12_1 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4 technology 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm Features QuickSync Tiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400) QuickSync Date of Announcement 11.12.2017 26.10.2017 01.09.2016 Link to Manufacturer Page ark.intel.com Power Consumption 15 Watt Transistors 4.5 Billion
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - UHD Graphics 605
0.2 pt (1%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Vega 9
1.3 pt (4%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 500
0.2 pt (0%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
129 Points (0%)
974 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
113 Points (0%)
872 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 32770 avg: 43574 median: 45008 (5%) max: 55453 Points
131922 Points (15%)
min: 19294 avg: 24491 median: 24609 (3%) max: 29579 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 13350 avg: 16118 median: 16553.5 (2%) max: 18016 Points
70492 Points (9%)
min: 12299 avg: 15195 median: 15085 (2%) max: 18200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 2670 avg: 3247 median: 3154 (3%) max: 4294 Points
13582 Points (15%)
min: 1932 avg: 2140 median: 2116 (2%) max: 2306 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 2874 avg: 3518 median: 3359.5 (1%) max: 4485 Points
19255 Points (5%)
min: 2578 avg: 3030 median: 3007 (1%) max: 3693 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 376 avg: 450.1 median: 419 (1%) max: 620 Points
2524 Points (4%)
min: 271 avg: 321.5 median: 307 (1%) max: 401 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 411 avg: 473.4 median: 454 (1%) max: 576 Points
2789 Points (3%)
min: 293 avg: 355.9 median: 362.5 (0%) max: 444 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 20859 avg: 25930 median: 26031 (3%) max: 30797 Points
94659 Points (11%)
min: 20140 avg: 26074 median: 23761 (3%) max: 34320 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
2870 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
2805 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
1628 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
1450 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
882 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
281 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 1614 avg: 1751 median: 1619 (2%) max: 2019 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 1849 avg: 2059 median: 1893 (1%) max: 2434 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 655 avg: 795 median: 748 (1%) max: 1009 Points
4424 Points (6%)
min: 414 avg: 533 median: 530 (1%) max: 655 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 588 avg: 701 median: 648 (1%) max: 902 Points
4380 Points (4%)
min: 368 avg: 478.6 median: 482 (0%) max: 584 Points
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel UHD Graphics 605 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2162 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
12628 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel UHD Graphics 605 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
1785 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
11100 Points (6%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
8388 Points (4%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
5802 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 605
min: 2882 avg: 4208 median: 4171 (5%) max: 5570 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
13365 Points (17%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 3393 avg: 3551 median: 3506 (5%) max: 3753 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
1.7 fps (1%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
6.5 fps (2%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
7.2 fps (3%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
9 fps (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel UHD Graphics 605 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3505 avg: 3812 median: 3773 (3%) max: 4366 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
6966 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 2791 avg: 2888 median: 2894 (2%) max: 3031 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 15.24 avg: 17.9 median: 17.9 (6%) max: 20.5 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
46.6 fps (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 7.05 avg: 8.2 median: 8.1 (3%) max: 9.61 fps
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.37 avg: 18.2 median: 18.1 (1%) max: 25.6 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
55 fps (3%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 10.15 avg: 12.9 median: 13 (1%) max: 15.74 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
98 % (98%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 97.7 avg: 97.8 median: 97.8 (98%) max: 98 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.9 avg: 6.4 median: 6.4 (1%) max: 6.8 fps
3.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9.9 avg: 12.8 median: 12.8 (1%) max: 15.7 fps
9.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 7.1 avg: 11 median: 11.3 (1%) max: 14.6 fps
49 fps (6%)
8.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 13 avg: 17.6 median: 16.5 (0%) max: 23.3 fps
57.4 fps (1%)
15 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 16 avg: 23.8 median: 22.1 (1%) max: 33.4 fps
73.1 fps (4%)
20 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel UHD Graphics 605 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 32 avg: 43.1 median: 45.5 (0%) max: 51.9 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
192 fps (2%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 500 42 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
23.3 fps (0%)
16.3 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
2 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 67 avg: 93.5 median: 93.5 (0%) max: 120 Samples/s
239 Samples/s (1%)
49 Samples/s (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 96 avg: 142 median: 142 (0%) max: 188 Samples/s
588 Samples/s (1%)
79 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 432 avg: 490.5 median: 490.5 (1%) max: 549 Points
2806 Points (3%)
min: 296 avg: 320 median: 324 (0%) max: 336 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.3 avg: 11 median: 11 (2%) max: 11.6 Watt
42.2 Watt (6%)
8.9 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
11.8 Watt (3%)
45.1 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.1 fps per Watt (9%)
0.2 fps per Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39 dB(A) (62%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
515 MHz (20%)
450 MHz (18%)
Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics 605 → 100% n=21 Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 → 406% n=21 Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 500 → 76% n=21
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
31.1 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
26 fps, max:
58 fps
fps
77%
HD Graphics 500:
23.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
7 8.2 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
6 fps, max:
11 fps
~ 8 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
49.8 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
41 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
57%
HD Graphics 500:
28.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
39 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
24 fps, max:
50 fps
fps
52%
HD Graphics 500:
20.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
26.6 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
18 fps, max:
34 fps
fps
52%
HD Graphics 500:
13.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
24.9 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
17 fps, max:
32 fps
fps
51%
HD Graphics 500:
12.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
23.6 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
11 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
15 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
8 fps, max:
22 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
6.5 10.9 ~ 9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.8 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.7 (!) [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
Problem during benchmarking occured: too slowmin:
9 fps, max:
15 fps
17.6 ~ 15 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
7.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
4 fps
50%
HD Graphics 500:
2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
4 fps
75%
HD Graphics 500:
3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
8.5 fps
0%
HD Graphics 500:
0 (!) [X] Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
Problem during benchmarking occured: game wont start fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
4.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
8.8 fps
63%
HD Graphics 500:
5.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3 fps
33%
HD Graphics 500:
1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
53 fps
65%
HD Graphics 500:
34.4 (!) [X] Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
Problem during benchmarking occured: error at the endmax:
93 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
8.9 fps
52%
HD Graphics 500:
4.6 (!) [X] Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
Problem during benchmarking occured: error at the endmax:
9 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5 6.4 7.2 8.6 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
9.1 ~ 7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.5 5.9 6 6.1 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
~ 5 fps
80%
HD Graphics 500:
3.9 4.7 ~ 4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.1 5.3 5.5 5.5 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
~ 5 fps
80%
HD Graphics 500:
3.6 4.3 ~ 4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.4 4.2 4.4 5.2 7.5 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN 1.3
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
~ 5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.3 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN 1.3
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
7 fps
143%
HD Graphics 500:
10 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
13 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
38 41.4 ~ 40 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
34.5 36.5 ~ 36 fps
48%
HD Graphics 500:
17.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
17 18.4 ~ 18 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.8 fps
53%
HD Graphics 500:
10 fps
70%
HD Graphics 500:
18.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.9 10 ~ 10 fps
62%
HD Graphics 500:
6.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5 fps
89%
HD Graphics 500:
4.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9 fps
97%
HD Graphics 500:
8.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
7.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.4 fps
139%
HD Graphics 500:
15.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
8.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
4.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
6.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.3 fps
126%
HD Graphics 500:
15.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
22.7 24.7 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
11 fps, max:
35 fps
~ 24 fps
80%
HD Graphics 500:
19.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.6 fps
76%
HD Graphics 500:
16.4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
15.8 fps
61%
HD Graphics 500:
9.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
32.5 33.7 35 35.9 36.5 49.5 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
42.8 fps, max:
-1 fps
~ 37 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.5 14 14.3 14.3 15.1 18.6 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
13.1 fps, max:
-1 fps
~ 15 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.9 6.7 7.4 7.8 10.6 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
8.7 fps, max:
-1 fps
~ 8 fps
70%
HD Graphics 500:
5.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.9 6.7 10 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
8.2 fps, max:
-1 fps
~ 8 fps
64%
HD Graphics 500:
5.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
1.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
42 fps
68%
HD Graphics 500:
28.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5 11.6 11.7 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
0.501 fps, P1:
5.85 fps, max:
33.2 fps
~ 11 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.3 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
0.3784 fps, P1:
4.59 fps, max:
34.4 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
10.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
7.8 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
6.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
31 fps
71%
HD Graphics 500:
22 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
20 fps
80%
HD Graphics 500:
16 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
13 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
13.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.4 fps
123%
HD Graphics 500:
17.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
96.9 fps
74%
HD Graphics 500:
71.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.8 fps
63%
HD Graphics 500:
13.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
10.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.3 fps
70%
HD Graphics 500:
10 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5 fps
66%
HD Graphics 500:
6.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
58.5 fps
75%
HD Graphics 500:
43.8 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
16.5 fps
116%
HD Graphics 500:
19.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
34.7 fps
84%
HD Graphics 500:
29.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.1 fps
84%
HD Graphics 500:
14.4 fps
71%
HD Graphics 500:
8.8 9.6 9.8 [X] Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472 Intel Celeron N3450 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
11 13 ~ 10 fps
75%
HD Graphics 500:
7.9 8.9 [X] Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472 Intel Celeron N3450 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
9.7 ~ 9 fps
68%
HD Graphics 500:
2.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
31.6 fps
68%
HD Graphics 500:
21.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.5 fps
50%
HD Graphics 500:
9.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
32.3 fps
60%
HD Graphics 500:
19.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.1 fps
53%
HD Graphics 500:
9.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
44.4 48.4 ~ 46 fps
33%
HD Graphics 500:
14 16.6 ~ 15 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
26.4 27.5 ~ 27 fps
52%
HD Graphics 500:
14 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
16.4 17.1 ~ 17 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
28.8 fps
59%
HD Graphics 500:
12.7 22 ~ 17 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.1 fps
64%
HD Graphics 500:
13.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
35 fps
79%
HD Graphics 500:
27.8 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
18 fps
68%
HD Graphics 500:
12.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
19.9 fps
56%
HD Graphics 500:
11.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.3 fps
62%
HD Graphics 500:
7.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
7.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
27.4 fps
84%
HD Graphics 500:
22.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.2 fps
52%
HD Graphics 500:
11.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
6.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
55.6 fps
72%
HD Graphics 500:
40.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
22.7 fps
65%
HD Graphics 500:
14.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
15.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
78.7 fps
69%
HD Graphics 500:
54.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.4 fps
81%
HD Graphics 500:
14.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
10 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.9 fps
Average Gaming Intel UHD Graphics 605 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 → 614% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 648%
Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 500 → 71% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 70%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Borderlands 3 28.3 13.5 7.8 F1 2019 51 21 18 12 Apex Legends 60.7 20.9 18 14.5 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29 8 Fortnite 48 22.3 15.7 9.1 Rocket League 100.7 46.2 30.4 Overwatch 92.3 36.3 19.3 The Witcher 3 41.9 13.3 8.1 BioShock Infinite 117.9 20.5 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 3 4 5 1 5 2 6
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 16. 15:57:32
#0 checking url part for id 8270 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9952 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 7543 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.163s ... 0.164s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.164s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.164s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8270 +0.06s ... 0.224s
#9 got single benchmarks 8270 +0.043s ... 0.266s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9952 +0.016s ... 0.283s
#11 got single benchmarks 9952 +0.006s ... 0.289s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7543 +0.014s ... 0.303s
#13 got single benchmarks 7543 +0.087s ... 0.39s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.39s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.492s ... 0.882s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.882s
#17 Got 315 rows for game benchmarks. +0.05s ... 0.932s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.932s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.052s ... 0.985s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.152s ... 1.136s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 1.136s
#22 return log +0.003s ... 1.139s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)