Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs Intel Core i5-9300H vs Intel Core i9-9880H

Intel Core i7-1065G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1065G7

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC of the Ice Lake U product family designed for thin laptops and Ultrabooks. It was announced in May 2019 (Computex). The CPU has four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading) clocked at 1.3 (base) - 3.9 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.8 GHz and all four 3.5 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock).

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The biggest improvement of Ice Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics adapter called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 EUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU from current Ryzen APUs.

Performance

The average 1065G7 in our database is most comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U and the Intel Core i5-8259U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a so-so result and a direct consequence of Intel's inability to make the best of its brand-new 10 nm node. The Core i7-10710U, a 10th generation processor built with an older 14 nm process, will easily rip a 1065G7 to pieces. That said, the 1065G7 will surely beat a 10710U in terms of energy efficiency.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 1065G7 that we know of. It can be around 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The quad-core Intel CPU is built with Intel's second-gen 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-9300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9300H

The Intel Core i5-9300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 Refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz (4 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-8300H from 2018, the 9300H is clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz CPU, +50 MHz GPU).

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Intel Core i5-9300H should perform similar as the older Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). The faster Coffee Lake CPUs, like the Core i7-8750H/9750H offers two additional cores and is therefore up to 50% faster in multithreaded benchmarks. Still, the performance of the i5-9300H should be sufficient for even demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i9-9880H

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i9-9880H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.3 - 4.8 GHz (4.1 GHz with 8 cores) and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 4.8 GHz can only be reached using the "Thermal Velocity Boost" which allows one core to boost to 4.8 GHz (+200 MHz) as long as the CPU temperature is below 50°C. Multiple cores can be boosted +100 MHz below 50°C (not verified). Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-8950HK, the 9980H is based on the same architecture but offers 2 more cores.

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i9-8950HK is the fastest model of the Coffee-Lake-H series at the time of announcement and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking of the CPU.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 33% compared to a similar clocked predecessor and even up to 100% compared to older Kaby-Lake quad-cores. Single thread performance however only improved slightly and the multi-core performance is heavily depending on the cooling.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

ModelIntel Core i7-1065G7Intel Core i5-9300HIntel Core i9-9880H
SeriesIntel Ice LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameIce Lake-UCoffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i5-1038NG72 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G7 « 1.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G71.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G41.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G11 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G11.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H « 2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock1300 - 3900 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz2300 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 88 / 16
TDP15 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1526FCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$250 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1065G7
29.8 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9300H
30.2 pt (42%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9880H
34.1 pt (47%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3127     avg: 3615     median: 3437 (3%)     max: 4281 Points
min: 8504     avg: 8670     median: 8747 (8%)     max: 8758 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1050     avg: 1131     median: 1131 (48%)     max: 1212 Points
min: 1140     avg: 1174     median: 1174 (50%)     max: 1208 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 358     avg: 438.1     median: 449 (50%)     max: 474 Points
min: 398     avg: 415.2     median: 419 (47%)     max: 427 Points
min: 441     avg: 459     median: 465 (52%)     max: 474 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1081     avg: 1510     median: 1543 (4%)     max: 2024 Points
min: 1530     avg: 1727     median: 1737 (4%)     max: 1877 Points
min: 2953     avg: 3271     median: 3235 (8%)     max: 3712 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 288     avg: 648     median: 662.5 (4%)     max: 836 Points
min: 717     avg: 784     median: 790 (5%)     max: 850 Points
min: 1317     avg: 1506     median: 1508 (10%)     max: 1721 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 141     avg: 174.2     median: 178.1 (54%)     max: 190 Points
min: 169     avg: 172.6     median: 172 (52%)     max: 176 Points
min: 181     avg: 190.1     median: 190 (57%)     max: 198 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.69     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (9%)     max: 9.37 Points
18.9 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.09     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (52%)     max: 2.17 Points
2.1 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7083     avg: 7254     median: 7270.5 (44%)     max: 7390 Points
min: 6421     avg: 6561     median: 6572 (40%)     max: 6677 Points
6967 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16551     avg: 21959     median: 22401.5 (16%)     max: 26481 Points
min: 21798     avg: 24198     median: 24623 (18%)     max: 25656 Points
42456 Points (31%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 232.9     avg: 281     median: 255.6 (3%)     max: 354.4 s
118.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.969     avg: 8     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 9.186 s
5.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4908     avg: 4953     median: 4956 (8%)     max: 4995 Points
5663 Points (9%)
6683 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 10406     avg: 17024     median: 17254.5 (10%)     max: 22898 MIPS
min: 20736     avg: 22008     median: 22133 (13%)     max: 23155 MIPS
min: 39455     avg: 42728     median: 42138 (24%)     max: 46591 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3289     avg: 4284     median: 4393 (53%)     max: 4589 MIPS
min: 4542     avg: 4592     median: 4609 (55%)     max: 4626 MIPS
min: 4837     avg: 4943     median: 4924 (59%)     max: 5068 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 40.6     avg: 45.1     median: 45.1 (16%)     max: 49.5 fps
49.4 fps (17%)
102.4 fps (36%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 175.5     avg: 184.9     median: 184.9 (43%)     max: 194.3 fps
193.7 fps (45%)
217 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 2.2     avg: 4.6     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 6.38 fps
min: 5.7     avg: 6.1     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.5 fps
min: 10.6     avg: 11.2     median: 11.1 (20%)     max: 11.86 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.449     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.459 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.7 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.79 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (14%)
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (13%)     max: 5 GB/s
4.7 GB/s (12%)
7.5 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 675     avg: 882     median: 836 (6%)     max: 1650 Seconds
min: 588     avg: 611     median: 602 (4%)     max: 643 Seconds
min: 293     avg: 336.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 384 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.661     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.798 sec
min: 0.621     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.6904 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9122     avg: 9209     median: 9208.5 (20%)     max: 9295 Points
min: 7787     avg: 8354     median: 8107 (17%)     max: 9169 Points
min: 11788     avg: 12226     median: 12225.5 (26%)     max: 12663 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.64     avg: 11.7     median: 11.7 (3%)     max: 14.72 s
9.1 s (2%)
8.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.92     avg: 23.2     median: 23.2 (1%)     max: 27.42 s
20.3 s (1%)
18.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 431     avg: 481     median: 481 (2%)     max: 531 s
496 s (2%)
476.5 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
26223 Points (23%)
26995 Points (24%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3401     avg: 8138     median: 8479.5 (23%)     max: 10494 Points
min: 7499     avg: 8987     median: 9107 (25%)     max: 10557 Points
min: 12593     avg: 15310     median: 15556 (42%)     max: 17046 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 29124     avg: 49182     median: 52060.5 (42%)     max: 54876 Points
min: 52412     avg: 55875     median: 56000 (46%)     max: 58466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 29190     avg: 46812     median: 48876 (40%)     max: 54424 Points
min: 49250     avg: 54277     median: 54947 (45%)     max: 58074 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 52974     avg: 57448     median: 57798 (49%)     max: 60169 Points
min: 58114     avg: 58963     median: 58413 (49%)     max: 61541 Points
40635 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5065     avg: 7011     median: 7365 (19%)     max: 8472 Points
min: 5356     avg: 7678     median: 7828.5 (20%)     max: 8903 Points
min: 10705     avg: 12582     median: 12214 (31%)     max: 15206 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2752     avg: 9928     median: 10445 (19%)     max: 12021 Points
min: 9387     avg: 11376     median: 11698 (21%)     max: 12349 Points
min: 14940     avg: 18040     median: 18580 (33%)     max: 20125 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2273     avg: 3365     median: 3523 (15%)     max: 4435 Points
min: 3165     avg: 4074     median: 4189 (18%)     max: 4861 Points
min: 6412     avg: 7482     median: 7221 (30%)     max: 9138 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 948     avg: 1274     median: 1316 (56%)     max: 1348 Points
min: 1115     avg: 1176     median: 1176 (50%)     max: 1237 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2464     avg: 4215     median: 4406.5 (8%)     max: 4855 Points
min: 7109     avg: 7231     median: 7231 (13%)     max: 7353 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1184     avg: 1295     median: 1310 (6%)     max: 1334 Points
min: 1095     avg: 1118     median: 1123 (5%)     max: 1137 Points
min: 1139     avg: 1188     median: 1186 (5%)     max: 1239 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3375     avg: 4436     median: 4648 (15%)     max: 4839 Points
min: 3697     avg: 4014     median: 4146 (13%)     max: 4200 Points
min: 6841     avg: 7034     median: 7100 (22%)     max: 7161 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5239     avg: 5587     median: 5637.5 (56%)     max: 5771 Points
min: 4704     avg: 4898     median: 4901 (49%)     max: 5089 Points
min: 5166     avg: 5409     median: 5457 (55%)     max: 5605 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14557     avg: 17869     median: 18459.5 (20%)     max: 18849 Points
min: 14853     avg: 16246     median: 16541 (18%)     max: 17684 Points
min: 28192     avg: 29022     median: 29077 (32%)     max: 29798 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5752 Points (78%)
5266 Points (72%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
18772 Points (46%)
16911 Points (41%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
14396 Points (26%)
min: 14195     avg: 15338     median: 15527.5 (28%)     max: 16101 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3863 Points (75%)
min: 3596     avg: 3854     median: 3854.5 (75%)     max: 4109 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 788     avg: 912     median: 861.5 (1%)     max: 1249 ms
min: 1079     avg: 1138     median: 1108.5 (1%)     max: 1349 ms
min: 715     avg: 919     median: 934 (1%)     max: 1044 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
88.9 ms (1%)
86.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25166     avg: 37201     median: 36670 (33%)     max: 53081 Points
min: 22225     avg: 32344     median: 33646 (30%)     max: 34957 Points
min: 38079     avg: 43238     median: 40443 (36%)     max: 50837 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 130     avg: 199.4     median: 201.5 (42%)     max: 216 Points
222 Points (46%)
184 Points (38%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1025 Points (39%)
940 Points (36%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 23.4     avg: 30.5     median: 26 (4%)     max: 48.3 Watt
85.2 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.1     avg: 34.8     median: 34.5 (6%)     max: 48.9 Watt
min: 99.9     avg: 131.6     median: 131.6 (24%)     max: 163.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.3 Watt (6%)
6.4 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.5     avg: 19.1     median: 19.3 (14%)     max: 25.5 Points per Watt
min: 10.5     avg: 12.5     median: 12.5 (9%)     max: 14.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1065G7 → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9300H → 104% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9880H → 143% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 15. 22:49:11

#0 checking url part for id 11399 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11356 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11348 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.041s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11399 +0.018s ... 0.059s

#8 got single benchmarks 11399 +0.123s ... 0.182s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11356 +0.015s ... 0.197s

#10 got single benchmarks 11356 +0.06s ... 0.257s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11348 +0.02s ... 0.277s

#12 got single benchmarks 11348 +0.033s ... 0.309s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.309s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.508s ... 0.817s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.817s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)