Samsung Galaxy Book Flex NP950QCG Review: Very Bright Display Thanks To Outdoor+ Mode

Samsung’s Galaxy Book Flex is a thin and compact 15.6-inch convertible equipped with a Core i7-1065G7 and a GeForce MX250. Its main competitors are the HP Envy x360 15, Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FDT, and Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.3 % | 10/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250 | 1.6 kg | 14.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.8 % | 09/2020 | HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng R5 4500U, Vega 6 | 2 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.5 % | 03/2020 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
84.8 % | 01/2020 | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.9 kg | 17.25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
Case & Connectivity – Thunderbolt 3 Included
For the Galaxy Flex, Samsung opted for a silver slim metal case with matted surfaces. The gaps are even, and we found no crevices or overhangs anywhere. The base unit could have been more rigid. In order to get to the internal hardware, you need to remove the screws hidden underneath the four rubber feet (clicked into place, not glued). Once undone you can start to carefully pry the delicate bottom cover open.
A total of three USB-C ports are available, two of which are connected to Thunderbolt 3 and the remaining to USB 3.2 Gen 1. A USB-C to USB-A dongle is included in the box. All three USB-C ports support Power Delivery as well as DisplayPort, which can be very beneficial. The latter requires a separate dongle that is not included in the box.
When equipped with our 64 GB Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC reference card the microSD card reader performed very well and managed maximum transfer speeds of 78.9 MB/s (transferring 250 JPEG files with 5 MB each) and 89.3 MB/s (transferring large files).
Intel’s AX201 Wi-Fi chip supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax. When connected to our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router the device performed exceptionally well under ideal conditions (no other Wi-Fi devices nearby, low distance between notebook and server).
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Size Comparison
Connectivity
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 177.7, n=50, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 257, n=45, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng |



Input Devices – Galax Book Supports Wireless Smartphone Charging
The backlit chiclet keyboard features rather shallow key travel but a very well-defined accentuation point in return. Key resistance was good. The keyboard does not flex while typing. The cursor keys are fairly small. The writing on the silver key caps is hard to read with the keyboard backlit enabled at normal brightness conditions. All in all, the keyboard turned out to be usable.
The large (4.8 x 3.1 inches) multitouch-capable clickpad features short key travel and a well-defined accentuation point. Not only is it a way to control the cursor but it can also charge Qi-enabled smartphones wirelessly. The charging feature is enabled and disabled via a keypress (FN + F11) and referred to as “Wireless Power Share” by Samsung.
The touchscreen (10-point multitouch) is fast and did not cause any issues during our review period. It supports input via fingers or the included S Pen. The latter is charged wirelessly.
Display – QLED with High Maximum Brightness
The 15.6-inch touchscreen display runs at a native resolution of 1920 x 1080. Its contrast ratio of 1,282:1 is decent and its brightness of 405 nits very good. The latter can be boosted to up to 600 nits by activating the so-called Outdoor+ mode. A big plus: the display did not show any signs of PWN flickering.
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 372 cd/m²
Contrast: 1282:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.53 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 5.34 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 BOE HF NE156FHM-N51, IPS, QLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng BOE NV156FHM-N4T, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T BOE HF NE156QUM-N64, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML B156HAN02.5, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -50% | -19% | -52% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99 | 40.43 -59% | 66.2 -33% | 39.04 -61% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 59.6 -40% | 97.2 -3% | 57.9 -42% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.9 | 41.77 -52% | 68.3 -21% | 40.33 -54% |
Response Times | 35% | -11% | 2% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 53 ? | 34 ? 36% | 60 ? -13% | 50.8 ? 4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 21 ? 34% | 35 ? -9% | 32.4 ? -1% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | -34% | 11% | -41% | |
Brightness middle | 436 | 314 -28% | 351 -19% | 286 -34% |
Brightness | 406 | 280 -31% | 335 -17% | 268 -34% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 72 -18% | 87 -1% | 83 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.275 19% | 0.31 9% | 0.2 41% |
Contrast | 1282 | 1142 -11% | 1132 -12% | 1430 12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.53 | 5.94 -68% | 1.74 51% | 7.3 -107% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.43 | 21.71 -158% | 2.76 67% | 21.7 -157% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.34 | 2.97 44% | 2.22 58% | 7 -31% |
Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.4 92% | 2.35 94% | 2.35 94% |
CCT | 7409 88% | 6581 99% | 6667 97% | 5847 111% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 78 | 38.1 -51% | 62 -21% | 36.9 -53% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 59.1 -41% | 97 -3% | 57.5 -42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.15 | 5.1 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-28% | -6% /
2% | -30% /
-38% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise | |
↘ 26 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (35.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18878 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Color accuracy was very good out of the box already, and with a DeltaE 2000 deviation of 3.5 it only barely missed the ideal of less than 3. The display did not suffer from a blue tint. It covers sRGB completely (100 %), and AdobeRGB by a decent 73 %.
Viewing angles are as wide as expected of an IPS panel, and it remains readable from all angles. Outdoors, it remains well usable thanks to its high display brightness. Nevertheless, its reflective display coating can be quite a hassle and challenge to overcome.
Performance – Enough for Office and Internet
The Galaxy Book Flex offers enough performance for office and internet applications. Our review unit was priced at around 1,800 Euros at the time of writing, with various other SKUs also available.
Normal Mode vs. Silent Mode
The preloaded Samsung Settings applications supports a so-called “Silent Mode”, which can lower noise emissions significantly at the expense of performance. However, the convertible is anything but silent in this mode, and “Quiet Mode” would have been a much better translation and description. We included some benchmark results obtained with activated Silent Mode below.
Processor
The Core i7-1065G7 (Ice Lake) quad-core CPU runs at a base clock speed of 1.3 GHz and can turbo boost up to 3.4 GHz on all four cores or up to 3.9 GHz on a single core. It supports Hyperthreading (two threads per core).
When running our CineBench multi-thread test the cores boost up to 3.3-3.5 GHz for a short period of time before settling at a slightly lower 2.9-3.1 GHz. In the single-thread test, recorded clock speeds varied between 1.6-3.9 GHz. On battery, clock speeds were throttled to just 1.4 and 1.6 GHz in the multi and single-thread test, respectively.
Whether or not a device is capable of maintaining high turbo boost speeds over long periods of time is determined by our CineBench R15 multi-thread loop running for at least 30 minutes. In this case, turbo boost is still applied albeit at medium levels. With Silent Mode enabled we found practically no application of turbo boost at all.
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (141 - 190, n=35) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 (Silent Mode) | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 3100, n=87, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (288 - 836, n=36) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 (Silent Mode) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (675 - 1650, n=23) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Average of class Convertible (180 - 4249, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Average of class Convertible (2046 - 6285, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3289 - 4589, n=24) | |
7z b 4 | |
Average of class Convertible (5394 - 74123, n=83, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (10406 - 22898, n=24) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (116.8 - 773, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (358 - 474, n=31) | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 7491, n=84, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1081 - 2024, n=31) |
Geekbench 5.4 | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (260 - 1996, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (948 - 1348, n=18) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 13919, n=84, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2464 - 4855, n=18) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Convertible (0.61 - 21.4, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.2 - 6.38, n=22) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (46.9 - 85.3, n=19) | |
Average of class Convertible (35.3 - 223, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (0.661 - 0.798, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4165 - 2.12, n=81, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
Overall system performance is smooth and fast. We did not encounter any issues. The CPU was more than capable to run all office and internet applications smoothly. PCMark benchmark results were decent.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3981 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4395 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5249 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4673 points | |
Help |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Average of class Convertible (3057 - 5032, n=7, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Average Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -38% | -12% | -4% | -6% | -12% | |
Write 4K | 173.4 | 104.5 -40% | 137.8 -21% | 142.3 -18% | 140.8 ? -19% | 147.7 ? -15% |
Read 4K | 50.9 | 49.7 -2% | 44.15 -13% | 47.56 -7% | 48.6 ? -5% | 55.9 ? 10% |
Write Seq | 2168 | 981 -55% | 2073 -4% | 2185 1% | 2106 ? -3% | 1770 ? -18% |
Read Seq | 1854 | 1517 -18% | 2165 17% | 2235 21% | 2099 ? 13% | 1957 ? 6% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 520 | 398.8 -23% | 431.9 -17% | 515 -1% | 451 ? -13% | 364 ? -30% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 585 | 338.4 -42% | 427.7 -27% | 413.4 -29% | 482 ? -18% | 447 ? -24% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2994 | 982 -67% | 2253 -25% | 2981 0% | 2903 ? -3% | 2382 ? -20% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3551 | 1650 -54% | 3480 -2% | 3565 0% | 3511 ? -1% | 3306 ? -7% |
AS SSD | -53% | -19% | -8% | -12% | -55% | |
Seq Read | 2453 | 1587 -35% | 2739 12% | 2732 11% | 2412 ? -2% | 2647 ? 8% |
Seq Write | 2339 | 864 -63% | 1307 -44% | 1477 -37% | 1983 ? -15% | 1551 ? -34% |
4K Read | 60.3 | 51.6 -14% | 47.43 -21% | 57.7 -4% | 53.1 ? -12% | 51.1 ? -15% |
4K Write | 142 | 125.1 -12% | 126 -11% | 136.3 -4% | 131.1 ? -8% | 148.8 ? 5% |
4K-64 Read | 1357 | 323.1 -76% | 1013 -25% | 1021 -25% | 1201 ? -11% | 859 ? -37% |
4K-64 Write | 1467 | 724 -51% | 1371 -7% | 1651 13% | 1726 ? 18% | 1091 ? -26% |
Access Time Read * | 0.044 | 0.101 -130% | 0.082 -86% | 0.062 -41% | 0.05525 ? -26% | 0.09334 ? -112% |
Access Time Write * | 0.027 | 0.046 -70% | 0.029 -7% | 0.028 -4% | 0.05394 ? -100% | 0.1383 ? -412% |
Score Read | 1662 | 533 -68% | 1335 -20% | 1352 -19% | 1495 ? -10% | 1175 ? -29% |
Score Write | 1843 | 935 -49% | 1628 -12% | 1935 5% | 2055 ? 12% | 1396 ? -24% |
Score Total | 4361 | 1725 -60% | 3582 -18% | 3929 -10% | 4303 ? -1% | 3129 ? -28% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2254 | 1323 -41% | 1931 -14% | 1972 -13% | 1894 ? -16% | 1674 ? -26% |
Copy Program MB/s | 521 | 340.8 -35% | 457.9 -12% | 642 23% | 539 ? 3% | 424 ? -19% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1242 | 823 -34% | 1242 0% | 1090 -12% | 1193 ? -4% | 915 ? -26% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -46% /
-47% | -16% /
-16% | -6% /
-7% | -9% /
-10% | -34% /
-40% |
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
The GPU of Samsung’s choice is a slightly aged GeForce MX250 (Pascal) with access to 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 3DMark benchmark results are at a level expected of this GPU. Given that the notebook supports Nvidia Optimus switching graphics its Intel CPU’s Iris Plus Graphics G7 is active as well.
3DMark 11 Performance | 5081 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 11929 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3406 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1244 points | |
Help |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
Average of class Convertible (471 - 35821, n=78, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3585 - 4942, n=29) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 (Silent Mode) | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
Average of class Convertible (365 - 25057, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2939 - 3885, n=29) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
Average of class Convertible (2965 - 138295, n=69, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (13805 - 23863, n=25) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
Average of class Convertible (94 - 10488, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (881 - 1169, n=22) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
Gaming Performance
This particular combination of CPU and GPU is capable of handling quite a few games smoothly, albeit at low resolutions and reduced details. Some more moderate games will even allow for higher settings. In return, current and more demanding games will require even further cutbacks on resolution and/or details.
The Witcher 3 - 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
Average of class Convertible (4 - 186.1, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (47.4 - 70, n=24) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (24 - 56, n=8) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T |
F1 2020 - 1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
Average of class Convertible (59.6 - 94.8, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (74 - 80, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng |
Serious Sam 4 - 1280x720 Lowest (DX12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 |
Star Wars Squadrons - 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years) |
We determine and evaluate sustained GPU performance by running Witcher 3 in FHD with maximum details without moving the avatar for a full hour.
By running this test, we were able to determine that after around 12 minutes the GPU started to throttle below its base clock speed and ran at just 1,519-1,582 MHz. Consequently, we noticed a drop in recorded frame rates. Given that these were significantly too low for smooth gameplay anyway we decided to run the same test with minimum details as well. The behavior was identical.
All in all, we can summarize that while the device is capable of gaming you will have to live with slightly fluctuating frame rates.