Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N95 vs Intel Core i5-8250U

Intel Processor N95

► remove from comparison Intel N95

The Intel Processor N95 (sometimes also called Celeron N95 or Pentium N95) is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. Compared to the similar Processor N100, the N95 offers a slightly higher TDP and therefore maybe a slightly improved sustained performance.

Performance

The average N95 in our database is in the same league as the Pentium 7505 and the Core i3-1115G4, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. That's not a great result, to put it mildly.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 1200 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N95 has a base power consumption of 12 W (compared to the 6 W of the N100) and is therefore well suited for thin and light systems. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Core i5-8250U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8250U

The Intel Core i5-8250U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i5-7200U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8250U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.6 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 3,4 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behavior will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

ModelIntel Processor N95Intel Core i5-8250U
CodenameAlder Lake-NKaby Lake Refresh
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Kaby Lake Refresh
Series: Kaby Lake Refresh Kaby Lake Refresh
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 « - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U compare1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U compare1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U compare1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U « 1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Clock <=3400 MHz1600 - 3400 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1264BGA1356
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
$297 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N95
24.8 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8250U
24.8 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N95 +
60 Points (34%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 181     avg: 182.3     median: 182 (3%)     max: 184 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
N95 +
min: 2528     avg: 2711     median: 2769 (3%)     max: 2786 Points
min: 3022     avg: 3108     median: 3108 (3%)     max: 3194 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
N95 +
min: 618     avg: 820     median: 914 (38%)     max: 935 Points
min: 840     avg: 874     median: 873.5 (37%)     max: 907 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N95 +
min: 229     avg: 306.8     median: 350 (38%)     max: 357 Points
min: 332     avg: 349.2     median: 353 (38%)     max: 355 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N95 +
min: 976     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (3%)     max: 1067 Points
min: 846     avg: 1148     median: 1171 (3%)     max: 1325 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N95 +
min: 408     avg: 437     median: 445 (3%)     max: 452 Points
min: 320     avg: 570     median: 562 (4%)     max: 730 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N95 +
min: 98     avg: 136.2     median: 151 (42%)     max: 155 Points
min: 81     avg: 141.1     median: 143 (40%)     max: 147 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N95 +
min: 5.18     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (7%)     max: 5.62 Points
min: 3.15     avg: 6     median: 5.9 (8%)     max: 7.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N95 +
min: 1.3     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (43%)     max: 1.86 Points
min: 0.91     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (39%)     max: 1.79 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N95 +
min: 3562     avg: 4529     median: 4783 (29%)     max: 5141 Points
min: 5349     avg: 5631     median: 5533 (33%)     max: 8356 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N95 +
min: 12582     avg: 13741     median: 13854 (10%)     max: 14545 Points
min: 14148     avg: 18261     median: 17987 (13%)     max: 22097 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
N95 +
min: 20429     avg: 21521     median: 22075 (14%)     max: 22275 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
N95 +
min: 5904     avg: 7259     median: 7574 (9%)     max: 8177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N95 +
min: 519.662     avg: 541     median: 537.3 (6%)     max: 568.939 s
min: 243.3     avg: 308.6     median: 306.2 (4%)     max: 402.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N95 +
min: 16.449     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18.213 s
min: 7.394     avg: 8.9     median: 8.1 (2%)     max: 13.75 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N95 +
min: 2181     avg: 2303     median: 2319.5 (4%)     max: 2391 Points
min: 3632     avg: 3991     median: 3991 (6%)     max: 4350 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
N95 +
min: 11654     avg: 12003     median: 12177 (7%)     max: 12224 MIPS
min: 11546     avg: 15262     median: 15365.5 (9%)     max: 17405 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N95 +
min: 2972     avg: 3521     median: 3803 (45%)     max: 3866 MIPS
min: 3641     avg: 3726     median: 3706 (44%)     max: 3925 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N95 +
min: 29.65     avg: 31.7     median: 32.4 (1%)     max: 32.45 fps
min: 29.5     avg: 32.8     median: 32 (1%)     max: 37.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N95 +
min: 145.25     avg: 158.2     median: 162.2 (4%)     max: 163.3 fps
min: 124.6     avg: 139.3     median: 137.5 (4%)     max: 157.6 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N95 +
min: 3.03     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (6%)     max: 3.29 fps
min: 3.02     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (8%)     max: 4.78 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N95 +
min: 0.236     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (7%)     max: 0.244 GB/s
min: 0.336     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (12%)     max: 0.415 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N95 +
min: 0.492     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.501 GB/s
min: 0.58     avg: 0.6     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.714 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N95 +
min: 2.4     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (7%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (9%)     max: 4 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 2161     avg: 2202     median: 2186.5 (28%)     max: 2275 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N95 +
min: 1103     avg: 1120     median: 1113 (8%)     max: 1152 Seconds
min: 813     avg: 948     median: 899.5 (6%)     max: 1209 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N95 +
min: 0.83     avg: 0.9     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 1.135 sec
min: 0.818     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 0.843 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N95 +
min: 5612     avg: 5863     median: 5952 (13%)     max: 6017 Points
min: 4775     avg: 6370     median: 6348 (14%)     max: 7575 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N95 +
min: 7.058     avg: 18.8     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 24.428 s
min: 10.9     avg: 11.7     median: 11.1 (2%)     max: 15.77 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N95 +
min: 17.513     avg: 39.7     median: 40.5 (2%)     max: 50.772 s
min: 24.9     avg: 26.3     median: 25.2 (1%)     max: 34.28 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N95 +
min: 532.8     avg: 845     median: 824.7 (4%)     max: 1025.92 s
min: 601     avg: 631     median: 613 (3%)     max: 783 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
N95 +
min: 13896     avg: 14556     median: 14595 (11%)     max: 14929 Points
min: 15198     avg: 20933     median: 21899 (17%)     max: 24736 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 5084     avg: 5571     median: 5661 (14%)     max: 5806 Points
min: 3233     avg: 6318     median: 6276 (15%)     max: 8014 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 36089     avg: 44673     median: 46477 (38%)     max: 47272 Points
min: 24077     avg: 44593     median: 45968.5 (37%)     max: 50962 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 36329     avg: 44756     median: 46489 (38%)     max: 47322 Points
min: 24155     avg: 44127     median: 45251 (37%)     max: 50910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 47145     avg: 48606     median: 49062 (39%)     max: 49955 Points
min: 34294     avg: 49389     median: 50347.5 (40%)     max: 52066 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 4105     avg: 4214     median: 4217 (11%)     max: 4345 Points
min: 3002     avg: 5863     median: 5774 (15%)     max: 7695 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 5701     avg: 5923     median: 5952 (11%)     max: 6062 Points
min: 4495     avg: 8511     median: 8453 (15%)     max: 10727 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
N95 +
min: 2081     avg: 2301     median: 2346 (10%)     max: 2386 Points
min: 1956     avg: 2709     median: 2663 (11%)     max: 3723 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 934     avg: 1132     median: 1227 (31%)     max: 1234 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 2800     avg: 2958     median: 2961 (11%)     max: 3114 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 902     avg: 1109     median: 1177 (37%)     max: 1181 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 2661     avg: 2835     median: 2850.5 (12%)     max: 2978 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 761     avg: 917     median: 999 (38%)     max: 1013 Points
min: 882     avg: 914     median: 925 (35%)     max: 936 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 2391     avg: 2577     median: 2566 (5%)     max: 2793 Points
min: 2265     avg: 3162     median: 3427 (6%)     max: 3516 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 749     avg: 910     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1005 Points
min: 923     avg: 927     median: 927 (4%)     max: 931 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 2382     avg: 2537     median: 2531 (8%)     max: 2737 Points
min: 3105     avg: 3298     median: 3298 (10%)     max: 3491 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 3411     avg: 4100     median: 4450 (44%)     max: 4553 Points
min: 3453     avg: 4116     median: 4095 (41%)     max: 4330 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 9662     avg: 10169     median: 10228 (10%)     max: 10798 Points
min: 11269     avg: 12833     median: 12751 (12%)     max: 14228 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3924     avg: 4076     median: 4029 (45%)     max: 4243 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10751     avg: 12210     median: 12131 (16%)     max: 13486 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10893     avg: 12606     median: 12742 (23%)     max: 13553 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3148     avg: 3302     median: 3242 (42%)     max: 3503 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14363     avg: 14408     median: 14407.5 (23%)     max: 14452 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3759     avg: 3829     median: 3828.5 (57%)     max: 3898 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N95 +
min: 1026     avg: 1186     median: 1056 (1%)     max: 1577 ms
min: 986     avg: 1221     median: 1259 (1%)     max: 1532 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 74.8     avg: 107.9     median: 91 (1%)     max: 265.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 22772     avg: 30123     median: 29871 (22%)     max: 35817 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N95 +
min: 93.2     avg: 121.3     median: 126.8 (35%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N95 +
min: 121.3     avg: 163.5     median: 178.3 (32%)     max: 183.4 Points
min: 163     avg: 169.5     median: 167.5 (30%)     max: 180 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
N95 +
min: 555     avg: 716     median: 764 (29%)     max: 820 Points
768 Points (29%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 31.5 Watt
min: 25.9     avg: 27.9     median: 28.3 (5%)     max: 29.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 18.9     avg: 21.4     median: 20.8 (4%)     max: 25.5 Watt
min: 27.7     avg: 29.5     median: 29.8 (5%)     max: 30.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 6.24     avg: 8.4     median: 7.3 (5%)     max: 12.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N95 +
21.1 Points per Watt (16%)
min: 16.8     avg: 18.1     median: 18.4 (14%)     max: 18.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N95 → 100% n=46

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8250U → 120% n=46

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 04:42:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14981 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9206 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759113733s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Sep 2025 05:17:48 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14981 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 14981 +0.01s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9206 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 9206 +0.107s ... 0.131s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.131s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.071s ... 0.202s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.205s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)