Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-10750H vs Intel Core i7-12650H

Intel Core i7-10750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10750H

The Intel Core i7-10750H is a fast 45 W processor designed for use in larger, beefier laptops. The Comet Lake-H family CPU was launched in mid-2020. It features six cores (twelve threads) running at 2.6 GHz Boosting up to 5 GHz (single-core Boost). The likely all-core Boost frequency is 4.3 GHz. Most of the specs are the same as the 10750H’s direct predecessor, the i7-9750H. The newer model has two advantages over its predecessor in that its Boost frequency is higher and the memory controller can now officially host memory clocked at 2,933 MHz, an upgrade over the 2,666 MHz limitation of the outgoing model.

Architecture

Comet Lake is a yet another revision of the dated Skylake architecture (not unlike the previous Coffee Lake, Whiskey Lake, Kaby Lake families) for similar feature set and performance-per-MHz figures. Core i7-10750H is manufactured on the third-gen 14 nm Intel process that is undeniably inferior to TSMC's 7 nm process, the one AMD’s Ryzen 4000 series laptop-grade processors are manufactured on.

The hexa-core CPU is compatible with up to 128 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2933 RAM and has support for PCI-Express 3.0 and Thunderbolt 3 but not the professional features (vPro, TXT, SIPP) as found in the case of Core i7-10850H.

Both the CPU cores and the iGPU have access to 12 MB of L3 cache. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

The 10750H gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1440 socket interface) and is thus pretty much impossible to replace.

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most similar to the Core i5-10500H, the Core i5-11400H and also the Ryzen 7 4700U. While perhaps not the best bang for the buck, the i7 is fast enough for any task, gaming included, as of late 2021.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 75 W, the ThinkPad P15 Gen 1-20ST000DGE is among the fastest laptops built around the 10750H that we know of. It can be about 80% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

We've known the Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU for a while. This is the same iGPU the Core i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H processors had. In this i7, the 24 EU iGPU is clocked at 350 MHz to 1,150 MHz.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 will let you connect up to 3 monitors with resolutions of up to 4096x2304@60. The built-in video decoder will happily handle AVC, HEVC, VP9 and other popular video codecs (AV1 is not supported though). This is not a gaming GPU as it is not fast enough to handle most AAA titles released in 2020. At 720p, Escape from Tarkov runs at just 17 fps (low quality preset), to give you an example. As the iGPU has no VRAM of its own, it is paramount that it is mated to fast system RAM.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to subpar, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

The Core i7-10750H has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W; laptop makers are free to reduce the value somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit, allowing for leaner designs at the cost of performance. Either way, a quality cooling solution is a must.

Intel Core i7-12650H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12650H

The Intel Core i7-12650H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 16 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.3 to 4.7 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.7 to 3.5 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12700H, the 12650H offers only 4 instead of 8 E-cores, a slower iGPU and no vPro features (for remote management).

Performance

The average 12650H in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-11950H, Ryzen 5 7640HS, Ryzen 9 5900HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very good result, as of early 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR is among the fastest laptops built around the 12650H that we know of. It can be more than 25% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 64 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.4 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The processor's maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W. It would take at least two fans to cool such a beast.

Last but not the least, Intel Core i7-12650H is built with Intel's fourth-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for OK, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-10750HIntel Core i7-12650H
CodenameComet Lake-HAlder Lake-H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Alder Lake-P
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H « 2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H « 1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H compare1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2600 - 5000 MHz1700 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB864 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 1210 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1440BGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-2933, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$435 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10750H
31.2 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12650H
37.1 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 85     avg: 98     median: 99 (56%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 294     avg: 515     median: 530 (10%)     max: 673 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4807     avg: 7129     median: 7463.5 (7%)     max: 8585 Points
min: 5362     avg: 11525     median: 12074 (11%)     max: 15537 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1136     avg: 1218     median: 1217 (51%)     max: 1271 Points
min: 1428     avg: 1722     median: 1763 (74%)     max: 1808 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 431     avg: 472.7     median: 472 (51%)     max: 504 Points
min: 552     avg: 664     median: 679 (74%)     max: 696 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1749     avg: 2848     median: 2941 (7%)     max: 3325 Points
min: 2106     avg: 4459     median: 4691 (11%)     max: 6009 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 804     avg: 1263     median: 1303.5 (8%)     max: 1418 Points
min: 753     avg: 1770     median: 1851.5 (12%)     max: 2253 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 184     avg: 196.7     median: 197 (55%)     max: 213 Points
min: 206     avg: 245.1     median: 250 (69%)     max: 261 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 13.71     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (18%)     max: 14.13 Points
min: 9.35     avg: 17.9     median: 18.2 (24%)     max: 25.04 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.17     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (52%)     max: 2.22 Points
min: 2.52     avg: 2.9     median: 3 (70%)     max: 3.15 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7275     avg: 7377     median: 7376.5 (45%)     max: 7478 Points
min: 7466     avg: 8300     median: 8301 (50%)     max: 8903 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 37009     avg: 37154     median: 37154 (27%)     max: 37299 Points
min: 20693     avg: 35422     median: 34901.5 (25%)     max: 49328 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 29444     avg: 52500     median: 52008 (33%)     max: 68516 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 11960     avg: 13177     median: 13397 (16%)     max: 14533 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
142.7 s (2%)
min: 266.983     avg: 410.5     median: 426 (5%)     max: 483.853 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.6 s (1%)
min: 3.705     avg: 6.5     median: 6.9 (1%)     max: 8.743 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6265     avg: 6287     median: 6287 (10%)     max: 6309 Points
min: 6896     avg: 7773     median: 7731.5 (12%)     max: 9090 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 26040     avg: 33946     median: 35346 (20%)     max: 37345 MIPS
min: 27053     avg: 46612     median: 47972 (28%)     max: 59034 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4504     avg: 5114     median: 5120 (60%)     max: 5470 MIPS
min: 5265     avg: 5635     median: 5702.5 (67%)     max: 6116 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 77.4     avg: 78.3     median: 78.3 (2%)     max: 79.2 fps
min: 53.8     avg: 91.5     median: 88.9 (2%)     max: 127.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 220.9     avg: 221.2     median: 221.2 (6%)     max: 221.5 fps
min: 197.2     avg: 255.4     median: 262.5 (7%)     max: 311.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.54     avg: 9.6     median: 9.9 (17%)     max: 11.6 fps
min: 6.62     avg: 13.8     median: 14.3 (25%)     max: 17.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.767     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (23%)     max: 0.78 GB/s
min: 0.674     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (26%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
min: 1.1     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (26%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.6 GB/s (20%)
min: 6.7     avg: 9     median: 8.9 (23%)     max: 11.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 396     avg: 538     median: 479 (6%)     max: 1029 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 322     avg: 389.1     median: 371 (3%)     max: 587 Seconds
min: 222     avg: 299.8     median: 277 (2%)     max: 553 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.578     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.708 sec
min: 0.4584     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.515 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10847     avg: 11405     median: 11307 (24%)     max: 12061 Points
min: 8344     avg: 12678     median: 12716 (27%)     max: 18599 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.3 s (2%)
min: 7.703     avg: 8     median: 7.9 (2%)     max: 8.891 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
min: 17.392     avg: 18     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 19.733 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
466.6 s (2%)
min: 413.002     avg: 436.2     median: 433.5 (2%)     max: 463.857 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
43210 Points (33%)
min: 30717     avg: 53165     median: 53162 (41%)     max: 75129 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8587     avg: 12991     median: 13325 (33%)     max: 14993 Points
min: 9219     avg: 18466     median: 18363 (45%)     max: 22811 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
61445 Points (50%)
min: 57680     avg: 80244     median: 83501.5 (68%)     max: 88686 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
60119 Points (49%)
min: 57559     avg: 81506     median: 85075.5 (69%)     max: 89577 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 63803     avg: 65556     median: 65498 (53%)     max: 67904 Points
min: 80654     avg: 88077     median: 87546.5 (70%)     max: 96373 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6797     avg: 10850     median: 11135 (28%)     max: 12015 Points
min: 8608     avg: 15722     median: 16486.5 (42%)     max: 19297 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 11653     avg: 17163     median: 17628.5 (31%)     max: 18769 Points
min: 12668     avg: 22820     median: 22920 (41%)     max: 27558 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4911     avg: 6649     median: 6852 (29%)     max: 7543 Points
min: 4231     avg: 9365     median: 9953 (42%)     max: 11800 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1517 Points (37%)
min: 2131     avg: 2357     median: 2384 (58%)     max: 2481 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
6704 Points (26%)
min: 7608     avg: 9408     median: 9656 (37%)     max: 11014 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2008     avg: 2222     median: 2254 (72%)     max: 2345 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 7273     avg: 9147     median: 9329 (38%)     max: 11255 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1114     avg: 1263     median: 1270 (48%)     max: 1333 Points
min: 1590     avg: 1743     median: 1758 (67%)     max: 1797 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4443     avg: 6135     median: 6308 (11%)     max: 6674 Points
min: 6478     avg: 9797     median: 9784 (18%)     max: 11284 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1215     avg: 1258     median: 1253 (5%)     max: 1325 Points
min: 1486     avg: 1677     median: 1705 (7%)     max: 1766 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5710     avg: 6283     median: 6338.5 (20%)     max: 6632 Points
min: 6287     avg: 9019     median: 9099 (29%)     max: 11153 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5321     avg: 5572     median: 5600.5 (56%)     max: 5832 Points
min: 6711     avg: 7411     median: 7483 (75%)     max: 7705 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22859     avg: 24682     median: 24897 (24%)     max: 25637 Points
min: 24621     avg: 34058     median: 34216 (34%)     max: 41477 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5640 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
24958 Points (33%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
min: 13808     avg: 15156     median: 15155.5 (79%)     max: 16503 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 764     avg: 783     median: 779 (1%)     max: 840 ms
min: 519     avg: 552     median: 542 (1%)     max: 652 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
86 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5561     avg: 46043     median: 53724.5 (39%)     max: 55732 Points
min: 85840     avg: 87864     median: 87864 (64%)     max: 89888 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 234     avg: 249.5     median: 250.5 (69%)     max: 268 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 202     avg: 225.2     median: 225 (40%)     max: 239 Points
min: 265     avg: 291.3     median: 295.5 (53%)     max: 309 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1532     avg: 1694     median: 1715 (64%)     max: 1875 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70.9     avg: 93.4     median: 95 (16%)     max: 123 Watt
min: 45.2     avg: 81.3     median: 78.3 (14%)     max: 112.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 78.5     avg: 103.7     median: 97.1 (18%)     max: 128 Watt
min: 52.8     avg: 95.3     median: 91.4 (17%)     max: 147 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.22     avg: 20.2     median: 20.1 (13%)     max: 47.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.04     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (10%)     max: 9.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 9.96     avg: 12.8     median: 13.7 (10%)     max: 15.1 Points per Watt
min: 15.3     avg: 18.9     median: 16.7 (12%)     max: 24.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10750H → 100% n=46

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12650H → 129% n=46

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 01. 10:00:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11708 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14051 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759305602s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 Oct 2025 05:17:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11708 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#8 got single benchmarks 11708 +0.069s ... 0.085s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14051 +0.005s ... 0.09s

#10 got single benchmarks 14051 +0.022s ... 0.112s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.112s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.077s ... 0.189s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.191s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)