Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-8259U vs Intel Core i7-1165G7

Intel Core i5-8259U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8259U is a quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in April 2018. Compared to its predecessor Core i5-7267U, the CPU is now a quad-core with Hyperthreading support for the execution of up to 8 threads simultaneously. The base frequency is 2.3 GHz, but the Turbo goes all the way up to 3.8 GHz. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to faster Core i5 and i7 models with eDRAM and 28 Watts, the i5-8259U only features 6 MB smart cache and the slowest clock of the Iris Plus GPU.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Considering the clocks of the Core i5-8259U, its performance should be between the 15W models Core i5-8350U and Core i7-8550U. The i5-8259U should still be faster than the i7-8550U in practice thanks to the increased TDP, especially during sustained workloads.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz (slowest clock of the 655, the fastest is 1200 MHz in combination with the i7-8559U) and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for quad-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

Intel Core i7-1165G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1165G7

The Intel Core i7-1165G7 is an upper mid-range, quad-core SoC designed for use in ultra-thin laptops. The Tiger Lake-UP3 processor was unveiled in September 2020; its Hyper-Threading-enabled Willow Cove CPU cores run at 2.8 GHz (base clock speed @ 28 W TDP) to 4.7 GHz (single-core Boost frequency). The all-core Boost frequency sits at 4.1 GHz. This i7 was the second-fastest CPU of TGL-UP3 line-up when Intel initially launched the series in 2020.

The i7 is ever-so-slightly inferior to Intel Core i7-1185G7 in that vPro support is nowhere to be found, the clock speeds are lower, and the iGPU's clock speed is a little lower as well.

Architecture

A sizeable performance-per-MHz boost is one of the many benefits of Tiger Lake generation compared to the older Ice Lake and Comet Lake product families. Core i7-1165G7 is compatible with dual-channel DDR4-3200 or quad-channel LPDDR4x-4267 RAM; Intel recommends using no more than 64 GB, for reference. The processor also supports PCI-Express 4.0 (4 lanes) and is capable of HW-accelerating certain AI workloads. Thunderbolt 4, USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 support is partially baked into the chip. Four PCI-Express 4.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

The i7 is built with the third-gen 10 nm Intel process marketed as SuperFin that is supposedly comparable to TSMC's 7 nm process, the one Ryzen 4000 and Ryzen 5000 series processors are manufactured on. Both the CPU cores and the iGPU have access to 12 MB of L3 cache. The SoC is supposed to be soldered straight on to the motherboard (BGA1449 socket interface); it is thus anything but user-replaceable.

Performance

The average i7-1165G7 in our database is just as fast as Intel's Core i5-10200H and Core i7-10810U are, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The chip is brave enough to come dangerously close to the noticeably costlier i7-1195G7 while unfortunately not quite reaching the high bar set by the Ryzen 3 5300U. That being said, it's a very decent CPU that will have no trouble chewing through light video editing and 3D rendering jobs on the go with a bit of gaming possible as well, as of early 2022.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 40 W, the Schenker Vision 15 is among the fastest laptops built around the 1165G7 that we know of. It can be more than 60% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96 EUs) is based on Intel's Generation 12 architecture. It is a lot faster than the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake) and UHD Graphics 620 (Comet Lake) solutions. The Xe has 96 Execution Units running at 400 MHz to 1,300 MHz, in the case of this Core i7.

This graphics adapter can drive up to 4 monitors in resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p@60 simultaneously, and the built-in video decoder is AV1-friendly. It will happily decode most other video codecs including HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and so on, too.

The Xe will let you play most games at 1080p / Low. It's nearly as fast as NVIDIA's GeForce MX350, surpassing anything we have seen from AMD's integrated graphics thus far. It is paramount that fast RAM is used as the Xe has no VRAM of its own. The other prerequisites for decent 3D performance are decently high Power Limits and a competent cooling solution.

Power consumption

The i7-1165G7 has a default TDP of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, these values are too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i7 is built with Intel's third-generation 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for decent, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-8259UIntel Core i7-1165G7
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Tiger Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-UTiger Lake-UP3
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
Intel Core i7-8559U compare2.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8557U compare1.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8269U compare2.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8279U compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8259U « 2.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8257U compare1.4 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8109U compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 « 2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2300 - 3800 MHz2800 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB320 KB
L2 Cache1 MB5 MB
L3 Cache6 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1528BGA1449
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2DDR4-3200/DDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (300 - 1050 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8259U
27.6 pt (38%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1165G7
34.5 pt (48%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3592     avg: 3792     median: 3728 (3%)     max: 4025 Points
min: 2525     avg: 5110     median: 5216 (5%)     max: 6862 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 959     avg: 976     median: 976.5 (42%)     max: 991 Points
min: 1110     avg: 1425     median: 1457.5 (62%)     max: 1539 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 369     avg: 378     median: 381 (42%)     max: 386 Points
min: 442     avg: 551     median: 564 (63%)     max: 589 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1385     avg: 1473     median: 1471 (4%)     max: 1567 Points
min: 1060     avg: 1967     median: 1996.5 (5%)     max: 2657 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 575     avg: 622     median: 615 (4%)     max: 687 Points
min: 553     avg: 847     median: 850 (5%)     max: 1027 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 132     avg: 147.1     median: 148.7 (45%)     max: 154 Points
min: 115     avg: 212.1     median: 218 (66%)     max: 230 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.1 Points (9%)
min: 5.26     avg: 8     median: 7.9 (10%)     max: 9.84 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (42%)
min: 2.16     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (62%)     max: 2.63 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5706 Points (34%)
min: 7815     avg: 8540     median: 8645 (52%)     max: 9053 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
21869 Points (16%)
min: 15248     avg: 22318     median: 22636 (16%)     max: 28753 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
27377 Points (19%)
min: 29428     avg: 36033     median: 36980 (26%)     max: 40744 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
7397 Points (9%)
min: 10812     avg: 11405     median: 11515.5 (14%)     max: 11777 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
248.6 s (3%)
min: 216.279     avg: 288.1     median: 288.1 (3%)     max: 360 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.5 s (2%)
min: 6.428     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 10.3 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
min: 402.3     avg: 583     median: 583.2 (2%)     max: 764 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
min: 8.53     avg: 16.1     median: 16.1 (8%)     max: 23.6 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5348 Points (8%)
min: 4619     avg: 5593     median: 5717 (9%)     max: 6444 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 17799     avg: 20778     median: 19104.5 (11%)     max: 28824 MIPS
min: 15347     avg: 22950     median: 23460 (13%)     max: 27405 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3753     avg: 3949     median: 3975.5 (48%)     max: 4022 MIPS
min: 4478     avg: 5184     median: 5217 (62%)     max: 5507 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 38.5     avg: 39.5     median: 39.5 (14%)     max: 40.5 fps
min: 43.9     avg: 46.3     median: 46.3 (16%)     max: 48.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 162.3     avg: 165.1     median: 165.1 (38%)     max: 167.95 fps
min: 186.9     avg: 198     median: 198 (46%)     max: 209 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.72     avg: 5.2     median: 5.4 (9%)     max: 5.49 fps
min: 1.39     avg: 6.3     median: 6.5 (11%)     max: 8.47 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.447     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.488 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (13%)
min: 0.792     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (14%)     max: 0.893 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.1 GB/s (11%)
min: 5.4     avg: 5.6     median: 5.7 (15%)     max: 5.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1331 Seconds (17%)
1150 Seconds (15%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 688     avg: 730     median: 729.5 (5%)     max: 769 Seconds
min: 468     avg: 618     median: 587 (4%)     max: 1138 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.738     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.818 sec
min: 0.552     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 1.002 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
7916 Points (17%)
min: 6508     avg: 7856     median: 7454 (16%)     max: 9036 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.1 s (2%)
min: 7.2     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.229 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.3 s (1%)
min: 15.6     avg: 15.7     median: 15.7 (1%)     max: 15.77 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
589 s (3%)
min: 366     avg: 397.1     median: 395.2 (2%)     max: 431.9 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25093 Points (22%)
min: 19752     avg: 23363     median: 23411.5 (20%)     max: 26875 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7105     avg: 8348     median: 8528.5 (23%)     max: 9276 Points
min: 4695     avg: 10244     median: 10943 (30%)     max: 12729 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 47878     avg: 49579     median: 49578.5 (40%)     max: 51279 Points
min: 42264     avg: 61343     median: 63812 (52%)     max: 70947 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 47855     avg: 49509     median: 49509 (40%)     max: 51163 Points
min: 46511     avg: 60571     median: 62205 (50%)     max: 68689 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 17718     avg: 40451     median: 49722 (42%)     max: 53914 Points
min: 36557     avg: 63092     median: 67985 (57%)     max: 71802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5946     avg: 6904     median: 6670.5 (17%)     max: 7927 Points
min: 3794     avg: 8046     median: 8299 (21%)     max: 9815 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8348     avg: 9726     median: 9743 (17%)     max: 11006 Points
min: 5877     avg: 12128     median: 12962.5 (23%)     max: 14548 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2752     avg: 3096     median: 3132 (13%)     max: 3346 Points
min: 1974     avg: 4193     median: 4209 (18%)     max: 5654 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
6808 Points (78%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 948     avg: 961     median: 951 (40%)     max: 984 Points
min: 1302     avg: 1524     median: 1532.5 (65%)     max: 1595 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3359     avg: 3602     median: 3607 (6%)     max: 3839 Points
min: 3078     avg: 5151     median: 5174.5 (9%)     max: 5926 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 944     avg: 957     median: 948 (4%)     max: 979 Points
min: 1344     avg: 1528     median: 1533 (7%)     max: 1587 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3335     avg: 3571     median: 3567 (11%)     max: 3811 Points
min: 1726     avg: 5032     median: 5200 (16%)     max: 5836 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4200     avg: 4265     median: 4211 (42%)     max: 4383 Points
min: 6172     avg: 6528     median: 6560.5 (66%)     max: 6826 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13421     avg: 14122     median: 13961 (16%)     max: 14984 Points
min: 12476     avg: 20843     median: 21250.5 (24%)     max: 23050 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
6462 Points (88%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
20978 Points (51%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1010     avg: 1054     median: 1068 (1%)     max: 1095 ms
min: 591     avg: 653     median: 642 (1%)     max: 795 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 134.3     avg: 135.1     median: 135.1 (1%)     max: 135.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 57117     avg: 63907     median: 64672 (58%)     max: 68127 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
140.3 Points (40%)
199.4 Points (57%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 173.3     avg: 176.9     median: 176 (37%)     max: 182.4 Points
min: 196     avg: 251.7     median: 253 (53%)     max: 314 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
20627 Points (33%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
12778 Points (59%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
954 Points (37%)
min: 1209     avg: 1329     median: 1349 (52%)     max: 1477 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
181 Points (100%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.1     avg: 42     median: 39.5 (7%)     max: 50.3 Watt
min: 21.1     avg: 39.2     median: 40.7 (7%)     max: 64.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.6     avg: 44.2     median: 43.7 (8%)     max: 51.3 Watt
min: 21.9     avg: 44     median: 43.7 (8%)     max: 69.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
13.9 Watt (9%)
6.8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.48     avg: 7.5     median: 7.1 (8%)     max: 11.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.4     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (10%)     max: 15.3 Points per Watt
min: 13.1     avg: 20.9     median: 18.9 (14%)     max: 43.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8259U → 100% n=48

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1165G7 → 127% n=48

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 08. 02:17:22

#0 checking url part for id 10068 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12118 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:39:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.041s ... 0.042s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10068 +0.021s ... 0.063s

#7 got single benchmarks 10068 +0.023s ... 0.087s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12118 +0.021s ... 0.108s

#9 got single benchmarks 12118 +0.384s ... 0.492s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.492s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.531s ... 1.023s

#12 return log +0.036s ... 1.059s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)