Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 Laptop Review: Intel's Tiger Lake quad-core beats AMD's hexa-core
When, a few months ago, Lenovo released the ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 with Ryzen 4000 CPUs, there arose an interesting dualism in the E series: There were still Intel-based versions of the Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 1 on the market, but they had an outdated design and were less compact. Gen 1 and Gen 2 ThinkPad E14s were sold at the same time.
Quite recently, Lenovo put an end to this paradoxical situation by bringing the ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 with Tiger Lake CPUs to the market. Our review device features the Intel Core i7-1165G7, 16 GB of RAM and a 512 GB SSD. There is also an Intel model with a dedicated GPU.
Because both the Intel and AMD models are identically built, we forewent including the information about the housing, connectivity, speakers and input devices in this review. Readers can find all relevant information in our review of the E14 Gen 2.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News translator (DE-EN)
- Review translation proofreader (DE-EN)
Details here
Likely Competitors
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.1 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 R5 4500U, Vega 6 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
83.2 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2020 | HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA R5 4500U, Vega 6 | 1.6 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
83 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2019 | Dell Latitude 3400 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.7 kg | 18.65 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Full HD display in the Lenovo laptop is still colour-inaccurate
Compared to the AMD variant of the Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 and the ThinkPad E14 Gen 1, the Intel version of the ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 offers two new screen options. This means that there are now four different display options, all of which have a matte screen surface:
- Full HD, 220 cd/m², TN, non-touch, 45 % of NTSC
- Full HD, 250 cd/m², IPS, non-touch, 45 % of NTSC
- Full HD, 300 cd/m², IPS, touch, 45 % of NTSC
- Full HD, 300 cd/m², IPS, non-touch, 72 % of NTSC
The touchscreen and the wide-gamut display are the two new options. Unfortunately, our review device comes with the second screen option; the 250-nit display that we already saw in other variants of the E14. At least, it achieves an average screen brightness of 292 cd/m². All in all, the screen is still the main distinguishing feature of the ThinkPads of the T-series, which often come with 400-nit screens.
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 292 cd/m²
Contrast: 1682:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 5.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.26% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE LP140WFA-SPD2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE NV140FHM-N48, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 B140HAN05.7, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA BOE0868, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 3400 BOE NV14N4H, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | 0% | 4% | 5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.26 | 40.31 5% | 38.16 0% | 39.92 4% | 40.68 6% |
sRGB Coverage | 57.2 | 60 5% | 57.2 0% | 59.6 4% | 59.3 4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.57 | 41.65 5% | 39.42 0% | 41.25 4% | 42.03 6% |
Response Times | -47% | -16% | -13% | -42% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38.4 ? | 52 ? -35% | 46.4 ? -21% | 40 ? -4% | 44 ? -15% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24.8 ? | 39.2 ? -58% | 27.2 ? -10% | 30 ? -21% | 42 ? -69% |
PWM Frequency | 1250 ? | 192 ? | 1000 ? | ||
Screen | 9% | -2% | -3% | -11% | |
Brightness middle | 286 | 305 7% | 281 -2% | 277 -3% | 240 -16% |
Brightness | 292 | 292 0% | 264 -10% | 270 -8% | 227 -22% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 89 5% | 87 2% | 88 4% | 79 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.17 -0% | 0.25 -47% | 0.285 -68% | 0.48 -182% |
Contrast | 1682 | 1794 7% | 1124 -33% | 972 -42% | 500 -70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.2 | 5.9 18% | 5.8 19% | 5.53 23% | 4.2 42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22.1 | 18.4 17% | 22.3 -1% | 10.68 52% | 7.16 68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.4 | 4.6 15% | 4.9 9% | 4.43 18% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 4.4 15% | 3.2 38% | 6.2 -19% | 1.75 66% |
Gamma | 2.52 87% | 2.05 107% | 2.15 102% | 2.34 94% | 2.36 93% |
CCT | 7086 92% | 6921 94% | 6452 101% | 7342 89% | 6387 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.3 | 38.2 5% | 36.2 0% | 38 5% | 38 5% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56.9 | 59.6 5% | 56.9 0% | 59 4% | 59 4% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
1% | -6% /
-4% | -4% /
-3% | -16% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Straight out of the box, the screen offers very poor colour reproduction as our analysis with X-Rite’s i1Pro 2 spectrophotometer and CalMAN software reveals. Even after calibration, there are still major issues with the saturation. However, the overall image quality is not all that bad, thanks to a high contrast ratio of 1682:1 and a relatively low black value.
The poor colour space coverage results in washed-out and inaccurate colours. Because the panel covers less than 60 % of sRGB, the Lenovo laptop is not suitable for image editing.
Outdoors, the screen of our review device literally does not shine, because it has a matte surface. Thanks to a brightness of about 300 cd/m², the display is readable in the shade and under an overcast sky. However, in direct sunlight, the screen is not legible.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Those who want good viewing angles should get a model with an IPS screen. The IPS panel in our review device offers wide viewing angles.
Performance: Lenovo allows the CPU to reach its full potential
The Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 comes with either of the two Intel CPUs: the Core i5-1135G7 and the i7-1165G7. There is also a version with the i3-1115G4, but it is currently unavailable in Germany. Intel variants have Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96 EUs), and there is also an Intel model with an optional dedicated GPU (Nvidia GeForce MX450). There is no AMD model with a dedicated graphics card. Intel models also do not offer an additional RAM slot, which is why they only come with a maximum of 32 GB of single-channel RAM. Our review device has an M.2-2242 SSD. Moreover, there is also a secondary M.2-2280 slot.
To learn more about various hardware configurations of the AMD model of the Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 2, check out this review.
Processor
The Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 is one of the first ThinkPads to feature Tiger Lake CPUs. The Intel Core i7-1165G7 is a Tiger Lake-based quad-core processor, which usually has a TDP of 12 to 28 watts. Under optimal conditions, it has a boost frequency of 4.8 GHz and a base frequency of 2.8 GHz. To learn more about how the Core i7-1165G7 stacks up against the competition, check out our CPU comparison page.
The i7-1165G7 in the E14 Gen 2 consumes significantly more than 28 watts: In the multicore section of the Cinebench benchmark, the CPU temporarily draws up to 50 watts. After 30 seconds, the power draw drops to 35 watts, which is still much higher than the maximum configurable TDP-up (28 watts) that Intel specifies for this chip. The Lenovo ThinkPad E14 is able to maintain the 35-watt TDP for a significant period of time. By the end of the Cinebench loop, the energy consumption falls to 29 watts, which is still a very high value.
This is why the Intel-based Lenovo laptop is able to offer a higher level of performance than the AMD model of the ThinkPad E14 Gen 2. The Ryzen 5 4500U in the AMD version is also slower under sustained load. The same applies to the HP ProBook 445 G7 with the Ryzen 5 4500U. The Intel variant of the ThinkPad E14 Gen 1 performed much, much worse. However, we must also say that the ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 with the octa-core AMD Ryzen 7 4700U should be faster, at least when it comes to multi-core performance, if our review of the ThinkPad E15 Gen 2 with the 4700U is anything to go by.
The CPU of the E14 Gen 2 does not throttle when running on battery.
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE | |
Dell Latitude 3400 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE | |
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE | |
Dell Latitude 3400 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE | |
Dell Latitude 3400 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE | |
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE | |
Dell Latitude 3400 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE | |
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=80) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=98, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=80) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=80) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=95, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
Even though the ThinkPad E14 does rather poorly in the Work
portion of the PCMark 8 benchmark, it feels very responsive in day-to-day use. The very high score in the newer PCMark 10 benchmark further corroborates our subjective impression of responsiveness.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4203 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3187 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5014 points | |
Help |
DPC Latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
The ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 comes with an NVMe SSD in the M.2-2242 form-factor. The 512 GB SSD from UMIS is very fast. However, it cannot beat SSDs from well-established companies—the Samsung PM991, for instance.
Straight out of the box, the second M.2 slot, which can take M.2-2280 SSDs, is empty.
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE Lenovo UMIS AM620 RPJTJ512MEE1OWX | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G | HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | Dell Latitude 3400 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Average Lenovo UMIS AM620 RPJTJ512MEE1OWX | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -9% | 6% | 5% | -6% | 0% | |
Write 4K | 129.3 | 121.9 -6% | 102.3 -21% | 144.6 12% | 107.9 -17% | 129.3 ? 0% |
Read 4K | 47.38 | 42.66 -10% | 32.12 -32% | 38.08 -20% | 40.27 -15% | 47.4 ? 0% |
Write Seq | 760 | 628 -17% | 1518 100% | 1320 74% | 1253 65% | 760 ? 0% |
Read Seq | 1699 | 1193 -30% | 1501 -12% | 1397 -18% | 1298 -24% | 1699 ? 0% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 488.8 | 590 21% | 356.4 -27% | 324.2 -34% | 415 -15% | 489 ? 0% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 407.5 | 414.5 2% | 459.6 13% | 434.8 7% | 313.3 -23% | 408 ? 0% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1244 | 866 -30% | 1507 21% | 1382 11% | 1297 4% | 1244 ? 0% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2127 | 2078 -2% | 2327 9% | 2354 11% | 1728 -19% | 2127 ? 0% |
Continuous read speed: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics Card
The Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs) is an integrated GPU with 96 execution units. Because the graphics chip has no dedicated video memory, it has to use RAM. The random access memory in the Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 runs in single-channel mode, because the laptop’s motherboard does not feature a secondary RAM slot or a soldered-in RAM module.
This is why the graphics chip performs somewhat worse here than in other laptops. The Radeon RX Vega 6 in the AMD Ryzen 5 4500U still cannot beat the Intel iGPU, though.
Just like the CPU, the GPU of the Lenovo laptop does not throttle when running on battery power.
3DMark 11 Performance | 6216 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3268 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1327 points | |
Help |
Gaming Performance
Despite a huge jump in performance when compared to the Intel-based predecessor, the iGPU version of the ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 is still not a good choice for gaming. The laptop can handle some modern titles, but only on low settings. The variant with the Nvidia GeForce MX450 will be a better choice for anyone who is interesting in gaming.
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 67.9 | 41.6 | 19.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 80.9 | 63.1 | 39.7 | 37 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 29.3 | 34.4 | 31.2 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 40.1 | 18.5 | ||
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 59.3 | 19.8 |
Emissions: ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 suffers from coil whine
System Noise
We shall start with the good news first: The fan of the ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 always stands still when idle. When the fan kicks in, it does not produce a lot of noise. Here, we measured a sound pressure level of roughly 33.4 dB(A).
However, the initial good impression is marred by coil whine. It crops up whenever the device is plugged in. In a relatively quiet room, the coil whine is audible at a normal distance from the laptop.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29.5 / 29.5 / 29.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.4 / 33.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM-1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29.5 dB(A) |
Temperature
Fortunately, the surface temperatures never get out of control. They peak at 46.3 °C (115.34 °F) and never exceed the important 50-°C (122 °F) mark. However, the temperatures in the wrist rest area reach up to 36.8 °C (98.24 °F), which is quite warm. All in all, though, the Intel version of the Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 does not get as hot as the AMD variant.
The Intel CPU did not throttle during our stress test. Even under a combined CPU/GPU load, the Intel chip managed to maintain a TDP of 29 watts. The clock rates never fell below the base frequency.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-9.2 °C / -16.5 F).
Speakers
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management: Lenovo laptop offers mediocre battery life
Energy Consumption
When compared to the ThinkPad E14 Gen 1, the power consumption has increased. However, AMD-based E14 Gen 2 models have the same power draw as our current review device. The maximum power draw of 65.2 watts is almost identical to the rated output of the power adapter, which should not be a problem in day-to-day use. The peak power draw cannot be maintained over an extended period time and the average power draw under load amounts to 27.2 watts.
Off / Standby | 0.38 / 0.93 Watt |
Idle | 3.6 / 7 / 9.1 Watt |
Load |
27.2 / 65.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Lenovo UMIS AM620 RPJTJ512MEE1OWX, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 R5 4500U, Vega 6, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA R5 4500U, Vega 6, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 3400 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | -13% | 8% | 19% | -32% | -17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 3.01 16% | 4.6 -28% | 3.5 3% | 2.4 33% | 5.34 ? -48% | 4.48 ? -24% |
Idle Average * | 7 | 6.32 10% | 7.6 -9% | 6.2 11% | 4.9 30% | 8.55 ? -22% | 7.47 ? -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.1 | 8.78 4% | 9.7 -7% | 8.8 3% | 7.4 19% | 10.8 ? -19% | 9.1 ? -0% |
Load Average * | 27.2 | 32.5 -19% | 39.1 -44% | 30 -10% | 31 -14% | 45.3 ? -67% | 42.6 ? -57% |
Load Maximum * | 65.2 | 45.5 30% | 50.3 23% | 45 31% | 47 28% | 67.5 ? -4% | 61.8 ? 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Battery Life
Lenovo has not made any changes to the battery capacity of ThinkPads in its E series for many years. The Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 with Tiger Lake CPUs offers the same battery capacity (45 Wh) as all other ThinkPads in this series, which is why it has basically the same battery runtimes as its direct predecessor. Nevertheless, the battery runtime of about 8h and 30m is neither extremely good nor extremely bad. However, the ThinkPads in the T-series offer significantly higher battery capacities (T14 50 Wh, T14s 57 Wh).
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 R5 4500U, Vega 6, 45 Wh | HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA R5 4500U, Vega 6, 45 Wh | Dell Latitude 3400 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -12% | -26% | -17% | 16% | 5% | |
H.264 | 628 | 617 -2% | 545 -13% | 728 ? 16% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 505 | 507 0% | 498 -1% | 523 4% | 584 16% | 615 ? 22% |
Load | 150 | 100 -33% | 55 -63% | 94 -37% | 117.2 ? -22% | |
Reader / Idle | 742 | 1304 ? |
Pros
Cons
Verdict: Impressive Tiger Lake performance in the Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 2
The Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 Intel combines the design of the AMD variant of the ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 with Intel’s Tiger Lake CPUs. Surprisingly enough, the Intel version outperforms the model with the AMD Ryzen 4000 chip.
The Intel Core i7-1165G7 in the ThinkPad E14 has a very high sustained TDP of about 29 to 35 watts, which is why the processor is able to achieve such an impressive level of performance. Intel’s quad-core CPU beats the hexa-core Ryzen 5 4500U and gets dangerously close to the octa-core Ryzen 7 4700U. The Intel model is not able to take the performance crown from the AMD model, though. However, at least now, it is not hopelessly beaten by its AMD counterpart. Intel’s Comet Lake chips compared very poorly to AMD’s Ryzen 4000 processors.
The Intel version of the ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 has all the features that the AMD model has. However, it also comes with a Thunderbolt 4 port; the Intel model is the first E series ThinkPad with this powerful and versatile port. Unfortunately, we were not able to test other new features such as better displays or the Nvidia GeForce MX450. These features are optional, which is a pity, because the standard colour-inaccurate display is very disappointing. Some individuals may be quite annoyed by coil whine, which crops up when the laptop is plugged in. Moreover, the ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 only comes with single-channel RAM.
The Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 is a good office notebook for the price-conscious buyers. This applies to both Intel and AMD models. However, the Intel variant offers new display and GPU options and comes with a Thunderbolt 4 port, which is why it is quite appealing.
In summary, we can recommend the ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 with a Tiger Lake processor to anyone who is looking for a powerful and comparatively cheap office notebook. The ThinkPad input devices make the E14 Gen 2 one of the best office laptops in this price range. Howbeit, when possible, users should get a model with a better LCD panel. Moreover, some users may be completely put off getting the ThinkPad E14 because of the annoying coil whine.
Price and Availability
The Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 2 can be purchased in Lenovo’s online store with prices starting at $599.
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20TA000DGE
- 01/20/2021 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig