Framework Laptop 13.5 Review: If Microsoft Made A Repairable Surface Laptop, This Would Be It

Laptops will never be as upgradeable or repairable as desktops, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't try. A small team of developers at Framework have designed their very own ultrathin laptop to be as end-user-serviceable as possible. More details about their project and goals can be found on their website here.
The 13.5-inch Framework Laptop is a 3:2 form factor system in the same vein as the HP Spectre x360 14 or Microsoft Surface Laptop 3. It runs on the same 11th gen Intel Tiger Lake-U platform that powers most of the latest Ultrabooks from more established OEMs. Tiger Lake is also key to many of the customizable features of the Framework Laptop. This review will explore the performance of the Core i7 Framework configuration to see how it compares to the big guns from HP, Lenovo, Microsoft, and others.
Are you a techie who knows how to translate? Then join our Team!
Details here
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.4 % | 07/2021 | Framework Laptop 13.5 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
89.5 % | 05/2021 | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | |
84.7 % | 05/2021 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
87.3 % | 04/2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 11.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
85.7 % | 08/2021 | HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U R7 5800U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
84.7 % | 07/2021 | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 18.2 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Case
It's clear that the makers of the Framework Laptop took inspiration from the Apple MacBook when it came to the design of the chassis. Chassis rigidity, however, isn't nearly as solid on the Framework system. The display flexes very easily and the hinges could have been tauter to reduce teetering. Chassis size and weight are otherwise comparable to the 13.5-inch ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 or slightly smaller than the Acer Swift 3 SF313.
Connectivity
The Framework system features four identical USB-C ports evenly distributed along the left and right edges. All ports support USB 4 speeds and are technically compatible with Thunderbolt devices including our Aorus Gaming Box. As of this writing, however, the manufacturer officially supports USB devices only.
The four USB-C ports are recessed onto the chassis to allow for expansion card adapters. The physical adapters themselves are proprietary, but the ports and connectors are not. Users are then free to mix and match different expansion card adapters to turn the 4x USB-C ports into MicroSD, USB-A, HDMI, DisplayPort, or some combination thereof.
The recessed USB-C ports will behave like any USB-C port with both Power Delivery and DisplayPort if no adapters are connected at all.
SD Card Reader
The MicroSD reader expansion card is a pain to use. The MicroSD slot is not spring loaded and so cards are difficult to insert and remove. It feels like our card is on the verge of breaking every time we use it here.
Transfer rates are decent but unimpressive. Moving 1 GB of pictures from our UHS-II test card takes about 14 seconds compared to less than half that on the Dell XPS 13.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U (AV Pro UHS-II V60) |
Communication
Webcam

Maintenance
The motherboard is upside-down unlike on most other laptops. Consequently, users must remove the keyboard deck instead of the bottom panel for any upgrades. The process is fortunately quite easy so long as users have a T5 Torx wrench.
Users have direct access to 2x SODIMM slots, 1x M.2 PCIe 4 2280 SSD slot, 1x WLAN slot, and the battery.
Accessories and Warranty
The DIY kit includes a Torx wrench, USB stick with Windows drivers, and several expansion card adapters for HDMI, MicroSD, USB-C, USB-A, and mini DisplayPort.
The standard one-year limited manufacturer warranty applies.
Input Devices
Keyboard
Key feedback is close to what HP offers on its EliteBook or Spectre laptops which happen to have some of our favorite keyboards. Both feedback and travel are firmer and deeper, respectively, than on most other Ultrabooks like the Asus ZenBook.
We would love to see dedicated user-programmable or customizable keys which would fit well with a laptop that centers so much on user customization.
Touchpad
The Precision-enabled clickpad is the same size as the clickpad on the Surface Laptop 3 (11.5 x 7.6 cm). Unlike on the Microsoft model, however, the Framework clickpad is louder when pressed and slightly softer in feedback.
Display
Framework uses the exact same 13.5-inch BOE NE135FBM-N41 IPS panel for its laptop as found on the Acer Swift 3 SF313. Thus, these two models share similar characteristics including the wide color coverage and relatively high contrast ratio. Response times are slow, however, meaning users will experience a lot of ghosting and blurring when gaming. The slow response times are otherwise not an issue for office-type workloads.
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 449 cd/m²
Contrast: 1151:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.34 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 0.96
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
70.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Framework Laptop 13.5 BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 13.50, 2256x1504 | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Samsung SDC4148, OLED, 13.50, 3000x2000 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 13.50, 2256x1504 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE LPM135M467, IPS, 13.50, 2256x1504 | HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U AUO4B2D, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AU Optronics B133HAN05.F, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 28% | -4% | -41% | 1% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 69 | 99.9 45% | 64.7 -6% | 40.1 -42% | 69.7 1% | |
sRGB Coverage | 99.3 | 100 1% | 97.2 -2% | 59.9 -40% | 99.2 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.3 | 96.1 37% | 66.9 -5% | 41.4 -41% | 71.4 2% | |
Response Times | 95% | -12% | 19% | 17% | 18% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55.6 ? | 2 ? 96% | 62.8 ? -13% | 53.6 ? 4% | 42.8 ? 23% | 46.8 ? 16% |
Response Time Black / White * | 36 ? | 2 ? 94% | 39.8 ? -11% | 24 ? 33% | 32 ? 11% | 28.8 ? 20% |
PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 21930 ? | ||||
Screen | 346% | 10% | 27% | -62% | -12% | |
Brightness middle | 449 | 370 -18% | 413 -8% | 466 4% | 304 -32% | 291.5 -35% |
Brightness | 435 | 374 -14% | 400 -8% | 454 4% | 292 -33% | 294 -32% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 90 -3% | 94 1% | 94 1% | 89 -4% | 93 0% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.01 97% | 0.29 26% | 0.23 41% | 0.23 41% | 0.19 51% |
Contrast | 1151 | 37000 3115% | 1424 24% | 2026 76% | 1322 15% | 1534 33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.34 | 2.57 -10% | 2.8 -20% | 2.1 10% | 5 -114% | 3.83 -64% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.07 | 4.52 36% | 7.2 -2% | 4.5 36% | 17.7 -150% | 8.43 -19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.96 | 2.31 -141% | 0.8 17% | 4.2 -338% | 1.07 -11% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 2.2 53% | 1.9 60% | 2.7 43% | 2.1 55% | 6.2 -32% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.36 93% | 2.12 104% | 2.08 106% | 2.03 108% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6760 96% | 6154 106% | 6510 100% | 6210 105% | 6443 101% | 6469 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 85.8 | 61.6 | 61.1 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 97.2 | 94.9 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 156% /
242% | -2% /
4% | 23% /
25% | -29% /
-46% | 2% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
The manufacturer does not calibrate at factory as evident by our X-Rite colorimeter results. Once calibrated, average grayscale and color deltaE values would improve dramatically from 4.7 and 2.34 to just 1.0 and 0.96, respectively. We recommend an end-user calibration to get the most out of the display. Alternatively, users can also apply our calibrated ICM profile above.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
55.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.2 ms rise | |
↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (35.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19370 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance
Processor
CPU performance is within 5 percent of the average Core i7-1165G7 laptop in our database. The i7-1185G7 is slightly slower due to its innate support for vPro security features. Certain AMD CPUs like the Ryzen 5 5500U or Ryzen 7 5700U are able to offer even faster multi-thread performance at the cost of single-thread performance.
Downgrading to the Core i5-1135G7 SKU will net users a 10 to 15 percent loss in multi-thread performance when compared to our i7-1165G7 SKU.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.4: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
PCMark 10 Score | 4768 points | |
Help |
DPC Latency
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Framework Laptop 13.5 Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H) | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G | HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -76% | -81% | -69% | -76% | -101% | |
Seq Read | 5613 | 1343 -76% | 1821 -68% | 1898 -66% | 1936 -66% | 1860 -67% |
Seq Write | 4909 | 1222 -75% | 794 -84% | 1065 -78% | 1237 -75% | 500 -90% |
4K Read | 80.6 | 63.6 -21% | 47.54 -41% | 58 -28% | 40.35 -50% | 36.26 -55% |
4K Write | 256.6 | 107.8 -58% | 141.6 -45% | 200.7 -22% | 99.5 -61% | 118.6 -54% |
4K-64 Read | 2222 | 417.5 -81% | 782 -65% | 580 -74% | 645 -71% | 419 -81% |
4K-64 Write | 2050 | 496 -76% | 766 -63% | 779 -62% | 365.8 -82% | 219 -89% |
Access Time Read * | 0.032 | 0.103 -222% | 0.191 -497% | 0.052 -63% | 0.104 -225% | 0.102 -219% |
Access Time Write * | 0.044 | 0.043 2% | 0.027 39% | 0.16 -264% | 0.038 14% | 0.17 -286% |
Score Read | 2864 | 615 -79% | 1012 -65% | 828 -71% | 879 -69% | 641 -78% |
Score Write | 2797 | 726 -74% | 987 -65% | 1087 -61% | 589 -79% | 388 -86% |
Score Total | 7098 | 1675 -76% | 2477 -65% | 2316 -67% | 1892 -73% | 1300 -82% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1926 | 334.9 -83% | 1243 -35% | 1659 -14% | 708 -63% | 880 -54% |
Copy Program MB/s | 947 | 276.3 -71% | 628 -34% | 519 -45% | 132.1 -86% | 185.3 -80% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1880 | 433.2 -77% | 976 -48% | 872 -54% | 326.7 -83% | 212.7 -89% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -42% | -67% | -49% | -67% | -68% | |
Write 4K | 299.4 | 128.9 -57% | 118.2 -61% | 226.6 -24% | 86.7 -71% | 89.2 -70% |
Read 4K | 87.6 | 140 60% | 37.54 -57% | 62.8 -28% | 32.45 -63% | 33.09 -62% |
Write Seq | 5205 | 1422 -73% | 1017 -80% | 1296 -75% | 1235 -76% | 988 -81% |
Read Seq | 4276 | 1660 -61% | 926 -78% | 1445 -66% | 1417 -67% | 1322 -69% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 846 | 475.1 -44% | 354.2 -58% | 545 -36% | 390.8 -54% | 332.6 -61% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 905 | 581 -36% | 352.6 -61% | 687 -24% | 291 -68% | 389.3 -57% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 5189 | 1793 -65% | 1174 -77% | 1483 -71% | 1384 -73% | 984 -81% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 6921 | 2536 -63% | 2261 -67% | 2334 -66% | 2350 -66% | 2461 -64% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -59% /
-64% | -74% /
-76% | -59% /
-62% | -72% /
-73% | -85% /
-89% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
Graphics performance is 15 to 25 percent slower than the average Iris Xe 96 EUs in our database due to the single-channel RAM on our test unit. Users can easily close this gap by installing dual-channel RAM.
3DMark 11 Performance | 5893 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15999 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2361 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1361 points | |
Help |