Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga Review: High-End-Business-Convertible with Intel EVO and Titanium chassis
Lenovo’s Titanium Yoga is an addition to the ThinkPad X1 series as an expensive convertible, which is sitting above the regular ThinkPad X1 Yoga. It is only 11.5 mm high, so it is the thinnest ThinkPad so far. Among others, Lenovo uses Titanium and the device is not available in black, which is usually the typical color for ThinkPads.
Our test unit with the model number 20QA0001RGE retails for about 2.800 Euros and uses an efficient Tiger Lake processor combined with 16 GB RAM, a 512 GB PCIe-SSD and the 3:2 aspect ratio touchscreen. An LTE modem is included as well. We want to check whether the addition charge over the regular ThinkPad X1 Yoga is justified, or if there are too many sacrifices for the thin chassis.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.3 % | 04/2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 11.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
89.8 % | 07/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
90.3 % | 04/2020 | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
89.4 % | 12/2020 | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 17.2 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
86.2 % | 01/2021 | Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1 kg | 17 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87.6 % | 03/2021 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 975 g | 15 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 |
Case - The thinnest ThinkPad so far
The biggest difference to other ThinkPad models is the case color of the X1 Titanium Yoga, which is just called Titanium by Lenovo. This expensive element is combined with carbon fiber for the top, while the bottom is made of a magnesium-aluminum alloy. The color is a bright silver and both the keyboard as well as the display frame (black) act as a visual contrast. The surface of the base unit is smooth, but there is a structured surface on the lid, which quickly attracts fingerprints. The base unit is much better in this respect. Expect for the two large and colored ThinkPad X1 logos on the lid and the base unit, we really like the visual appearance.
At just 11.5 millimeters, the X1 Titanium Yoga is the thinnest ThinkPad so far, but the stability is still on a very good level overall. You can slightly twist the base unit and dent the center area of the keyboard a bit, but this should not be noticeable in real-life scenarios. There are no annoying creaking sounds, either.
Being a convertible, there are obviously different operating modes and you can open the display by 360 degrees. However, the two hinges are not perfectly adjusted, because there is visible bouncing and the screen also falls down at an angle of ~20 degrees; the hinges cannot hold it in place anymore at this angle. You also notice the thick bezels above and especially below the screen. It is already a 3:2 touchscreen, but it seems Lenovo needed the additional space for the base unit.
Our test unit (no pre-production unit) does show three build quality issues. One visual issue is at the edge of the lid, where the surface structure is not perfectly applied all the way (see picture above). One corner of the touchpad is also sitting a bit lower in the base unit (but more on that later) and the lid is sitting at a slight angle. When the device is closed, the lid and the base unit sot flush at the left front, but the lid is slightly protruding at the right side. This should obviously not happen on a device in this price range. We cannot clarify whether this is an isolated incident of our unit or a general problem, but we will try to get another test unit to be sure.
With a height of 11.5 mm, the X1 Titanium Yoga is clearly the thinnest device in our comparison, but it is also the deepest model and it looks like it was pressed flat. It has a 3:2 aspect ratio screen, so it is obviously deeper than convertibles with 16:9 or 16:10 screens, but the HP Spectre x360 14 (also 3:2) is about 1.3 cm shorter at virtually the same width. This means the ThinkPad has a pretty big footprint. The weight of ~1.2 kg is average; both the Fujitsu LifeBook as well as the HP Elite Dragonfly are lighter.
Connectivity - X1 Titanium with Thunderbolt 4
Just like the ThinkPad X1 Nano, Lenovo only implements two USB-C ports on the left side. They support Thunderbolt 4 and USB 4, but you will probably need adapters in practice. You can drive a total of three displays (1x internally, 2x externally) with a maximum resolution of 5120 x 3200 pixels (60 Hz).
ThinkPads with the model year 2021 are supposed to get a power button above the keyboard, which is also a fingerprint scanner at the same time. The latter is already included, but the power button is still located at the right side and occupies important space, which could have been used for another port. Finally, you get a 3.5 mm stereo jack.
Communication
In addition to the modern Wi-Fi module from Intel (AX201), which supports all important standards including 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6) as well as Bluetooth 5.2, the X1 Titanium Yoga also offers a slot for a WWAN module (M.2-2242). You can either get a 4G module from Fibocom (L850-GL, LTE Cat.9) in combination with a Nano-SIM slot, or a 5G module (Snapdragon X55, LTE Cat.20) in combination with an eSIM.
The Wi-Fi connection was very stable in our tests with Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 5 routers and our standardized test with the Netgear router Nighthawk RAX120 determined very good transfer rates. It was not problem to use a SIM-card from T-Mobile with the test unit.
Webcam
There are two cameras above the display: The IR camera for facial recognition via Windows Hello and the standard webcam with the 720p resolution (0.9 MP) including mechanical shutter (Think Shutter). The quality of the webcam is low, as expected for this resolution. It seems that webcams are still pretty unimportant for manufacturers. Considering the pretty thick bezel, we are pretty sure it could have accommodated a better sensor.
Security
In addition to the IR camera for facial recognition, you can also use your fingerprint to log in. The ThinkPad x1 Titanium Yoga is one of the first ThinkPads where the fingerprint scanner is located above the keyboard and it should be combined with the power button (but this is not the case here). The scanner works very well in our tests. As per usual, you get a TPM 2.0 chip and you can set different password in the BIOS, but there is no SmartCard reader. You do get a slot for a Kensington Lock (Nano Security) on the right side to protect the device against theft.
Accessories
The box only includes the convertible itself, the compact 65W power adapter, and some service brochures. Some models are shipped with an active pen (Lenovo Precision Pen), but our test unit was not shipped with it.
Maintenance
The bottom panel of the X1 Titanium Yoga is secured by six regular screws and is easy to remove. You can clean the fan and get access to the small M.2-2242 SSD (PCIe 3.0 x4) as well as the WWAN module. All the other components like the Wi-Fi module or the RAM are directly soldered onto the mainboard.
Input Devices - Lenovo uses keyboard with reduced travel
Keyboard
Similar to the ThinkPad X1 Nano, Lenovo equips the thin X1 Titanium Yoga with smaller keyboard with reduced key travel. While the regular ThinkPad X1 Yoga (also the upcoming G6 generation) get the familiar 1.5 mm key travel, it is reduced to 1.35 mm on the Xi Titanium Yoga. It is not a bad keyboard by any means, and both the feedback as well as the key strokes are still precise, but the subjective typing experience is noticeably worse compared to other ThinkPad models, even much more affordable series.
The overall size of the keyboard is smaller as well. Compared to the regular X1 Yoga, the standard letter keys are shrunk from 16 x 16 mm to 15 x 15 mm and there are even narrower keys (15 x 12 mm) on the right side of the keyboard. We believe you will get used to the size, but we are not sure if the step was really necessary. The chassis is wider compared to the X1 Nano and we believe the place on the sides could have been used for a larger keyboard (where the speakers are located).
The keyboard illumination is a bit of a surprise. You still get two intensities and it is still white, but the color differs between the regular keys and the upper row of F keys, where the illumination has a slight blue tint. We would also expect more comfort features on a flagship device like more brightness levels and an automatic activation depending on the ambient lighting. As per usual, the keyboard is spill-water resistant.
Touchpad, TrackPoint & Touchscreen
The touchpad (9 x 6.5 cm) reveals the next build quality issue, because the upper right corner is sitting slightly lower inside the chassis. We are not happy with the controls, either. Contrary to many other clickpads, you can click down the whole pad, but the travel is extremely shallow, which results in a strange feeling. The haptic feedback is just odd and the clicking noise also appears pretty cheap. The pad is also extremely sensitive and often recognizes clicks even though you did not want to click (the Windows settings was the default medium setting). The gliding capabilities are not perfect, either, because small movements are often not recognized correctly or the cursor just stops moving, so you have to lift the finger again. All in all, the touchpad is disappointing.
You can obviously use the TrackPoint with the dedicated mouse buttons instead. It works as expected and is therefore the better input method. The dedicated buttons are well integrated into the base unit, there is no clatter, and they provide a consistent clicking sound.
Finally, there is the capacitive touchscreen, which recognizes up to 10 fingers simultaneously and we did not experience any issues.
Display - ThinkPad with 3:2 Touchscreen
While the upcoming ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6 switches back from 16:9 to 16:10, Lenovo equips the X1 Titanium Yoga with a glossy 13.5-inch touchscreen (3:2) and the resolution of 2256 x 1504 pixels. The subjective picture impression is excellent with crisp colors and sharp contents. We cannot detect PWM flickering and backlight bleeding is only visible on dark images in combination with high brightness levels, but this is no problem in everyday use. The panel supports HDR400 and HDR contents are displayed correctly. However, the maximum brightness is much lower compared to TVs, so the HDR effect is smaller.
Lenovo advertises a brightness of 450 cd/m² and we can confirm this with our measurements: We determine up to 470 cd/m² and 454 cd/m² on average (brightness distribution 94%) for the panel from JDI (Japan Display Inc.). The black value is still pretty low at 0.23 cd/m², which results in an excellent contrast ratio of more than 2000:1.
The only two points of criticism are the glossy screen surface, which can be result in reflections depending on the ambient lighting, as well as the pretty slow response time (grey to grey). There is visible ghosting when you move the cursor, for example.
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 470 cd/m²
Contrast: 2026:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE LPM135M467, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 LP140WF9-SPE1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA AUO5E2D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 LG Philips LGD0663, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.50 | Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X LQ133M1JW48, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL N133GCA-GQ1, a-SI IPS LED, 2560x1600, 13.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | ||||||
Display P3 Coverage | 64.3 | 69 | 65.8 | 66.4 | 65.1 | |
sRGB Coverage | 95.5 | 99.4 | 98.2 | 96.9 | 97.1 | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.6 | 70.9 | 67.9 | 67.4 | 66.6 | |
Response Times | -2% | -27% | -41% | -30% | 21% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 53.6 ? | 52 ? 3% | 60.8 ? -13% | 62 ? -16% | 62.4 ? -16% | 38.4 ? 28% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 25.6 ? -7% | 33.8 ? -41% | 39.6 ? -65% | 34.4 ? -43% | 20.8 ? 13% |
PWM Frequency | 211.9 ? | |||||
Screen | -35% | 0% | -3% | -14% | -11% | |
Brightness middle | 466 | 409 -12% | 411 -12% | 443.5 -5% | 345 -26% | 325 -30% |
Brightness | 454 | 405 -11% | 388 -15% | 394 -13% | 317 -30% | 297 -35% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 95 1% | 87 -7% | 78 -17% | 86 -9% | 83 -12% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.21 9% | 0.22 4% | 0.17 26% | 0.24 -4% | 0.26 -13% |
Contrast | 2026 | 1948 -4% | 1868 -8% | 2609 29% | 1438 -29% | 1250 -38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 4.9 -133% | 1.8 14% | 2.7 -29% | 2.7 -29% | 2.2 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.5 | 8.4 -87% | 4.1 9% | 4.36 3% | 4.2 7% | 3.5 22% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 5.8 -115% | 2.5 7% | 3.4 -26% | 3.3 -22% | 2.8 -4% |
Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.53 87% | 2.26 97% | 2.09 105% | 2.31 95% | 2.05 107% |
CCT | 6210 105% | 7009 93% | 6448 101% | 6144 106% | 7188 90% | 6452 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.1 | 60.7 -1% | 64.7 6% | 62.1 2% | 62.4 2% | 61.3 0% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94.9 | 95.3 0% | 99.3 5% | 98.5 4% | 96.9 2% | 97 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 1 | 2.61 | 1 | 0.6 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -19% /
-30% | -14% /
-4% | -22% /
-9% | -22% /
-16% | 5% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
We use the professional CalMAN software in combination with the X-Rite i1 Pro 2 spectrophotometer. The display is already well-calibrated out of the box compared to the sRGB reference color space. There are some deviations in the grayscale, but there is no visible color hue. The color temperature is also slightly too low, so the picture appears a bit warm. However, you will only notice this when you compared the screen with a calibrated panel. All the color deviations are already below the important mark of 3, which means the human eye cannot see a deviation compared to the reference.
We tried to calibrate the panel of the X1 Titanium Yoga multiple times, but the result always reduced the picture quality. In addition to a clearly visible blue cast in combination with a much too cool color temperature, we also noticed increased color deviations. This means we cannot offer a calibrated profile for this device.
The small sRGB color space is almost covered completely and the color accuracy is good (out of the box), so you can use this panel for picture and video editing.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
53.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Thanks to the high brightness, you can still see the display content in bright environments, but you have to be careful to avoid reflections on the glossy screen. The viewing angle stability is obviously important for a convertible, for example when you want to share the content with multiple persons. The integrated IPS-panel does not disappoint.
Performance - Tiger Lake UP4 with 12 Watts
Most high-end business convertibles are exclusively available with Intel processors, currently Tiger Lake chips with optional vPro support. Similar to the ThinkPad X1 Nano, Lenovo does not use the common UP3 chips, but more efficient UP4 chips that are also smaller in terms of physical size. The TDP is lower as well, although the manufacturers do not have to follow Intel’s recommendations. The X1 Titanium Yoga is only available with 16 GB RAM (LPDDR4x-4266) in the EMEA region, but other regions also get models with 8 GB. You cannot expand the memory, so we definitely recommend 16 GB models.
Contrary to the consumer models, Lenovo implemented the power profiles from the Vantage software into the standard Windows performance slider on their ThinkPads, which is very comfortable in practice.
Processor - Core i7-1160G7
Our test unit is equipped with the Intel Core i7-1160G7 with 4 cores, which can run at up to 4.4 GHz (up to 3.6 GHz for all 4 active cores). A look at the TDP limits reveals a big difference to the ThinkPad X1 Nano with the same CPU, where the cooling solution was able to handle a sustained consumption of ~19W, which was clearly above the specified 7-15W from Intel for the UP4 chip. The X1 Titanium Yoga uses a different configuration. While the short-term limit is also pretty high at 40W, high core temperatures will quickly activate the long-term limit at 12W.
Our Cinebench R15 Multi loop shows that the processor consumes ~33W for a couple of seconds, but the core temperature immediately reaches 90 °C, so the performance has to be reduced. A new iteration will let the consumption spike for a short time, but it quickly stabilizes at 12W again, which is sufficient for 4x 2.0 GHz. The X1 Nano manages 4x 2.6-2.7 GHz at 19W, so the cooling performance of the X1 Titanium Yoga is definitely less powerful.
All in all, the performance is comparable with the regular X1 Yoga and the Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X with the older Comet Lake chips. The HP Elite Dragonfly is a bit slower, but this is a result of the old Whiskey Lake CPU. The cooling performance is actually a little bit better (12.5W), so the Dragonfly would be comparable with a current processor. Both the ThinkPad X1 Nano as well as the HP Spectre x360 14 offer more CPU performance.
So what does this mean for everyday use? There is still plenty of CPU performance for common workloads (meetings, Office suite, web applications) and the device benefits from the high clocks in short peak load situations. The device is obviously not designed for sustained CPU load scenarios. It can still handle them, but there are better solutions on the market. The CPU performance is not reduced on battery power. Considering the low TDP limitations, the cheaper Core i5-1130G7 should not be much slower. More benchmarks and data for the Core i7-1160G7 are available in our Tech section.
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (116.8 - 755, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (484 - 544, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=64, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL | |
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (1224 - 2068, n=4) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (170 - 208, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (753 - 864, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (625 - 1115, n=4) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Average of class Convertible (193 - 3620, n=59, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL | |
Average of class Convertible (2046 - 6417, n=61, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (4448 - 4621, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Convertible (7703 - 72400, n=61, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL | |
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (15740 - 22305, n=4) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 1981, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (1406 - 1484, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (4660 - 5258, n=4) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Convertible (0.61 - 20.1, n=63, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL | |
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (3.75 - 6.06, n=4) | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X | |
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (49.8 - 61.3, n=4) | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 223, n=61, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X | |
Average Intel Core i7-1160G7 (0.64 - 0.76, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.967, n=61, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
Thanks to the modern processor, the fast iGPU, sufficient amount of RAM, and the PCIe-SSD, the X1 Titanium Yoga is a very responsive system and we did not notice any problems during our review period. Inputs are executed without noticeable delays and it is enjoyable to use in everyday situations. The benchmark results are decent and confirm that the comparatively slow CPU performance is no bottleneck in practice.
PCMark 10 Score | 4554 points | |
Help |
DPC Latency
Our standardized DPC Latency test revealed some issues, which is why the X1 Titanium Yoga is no suited for real-time audio applications. However, we did not see any dropped frames during the playback of a 4K YouTube video. Maybe Lenovo can improve the situation with an update; we did not experience any problems in this section when we reviewed the ThinkPad X1 Yoga.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X | |
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices - M.2-2242 with PCIe 3.0 x4
Lenovo uses a compact M.2-2242 SSD, which is attached via PCIe 3.0 x4 interface. Our test unit was equipped with a 512 GB drive from Toshiba (434 GB are usable after the initial set-up) and the transfer rates are decent. There are faster PCIe 3.0 drives on the market, but you will not notice the difference in practice.
Like the ThinkPad X1 Nano, the X1 Titanium Yoga is still a model year 2020 device, so it does not get a PCIe 4.0 interface, despite the modern Tiger Lake CPU. More benchmarks for the Toshiba drive and other SSD models are available in our database.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Average Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 10% | -18% | 13% | -18% | 16% | -21% | |
Write 4K | 226.6 | 158.5 -30% | 88 -61% | 82.2 -64% | 134.2 -41% | 139.5 -38% | 133.9 ? -41% |
Read 4K | 62.8 | 49.78 -21% | 132.1 110% | 45.7 -27% | 53.4 -15% | 36.38 -42% | 40.4 ? -36% |
Write Seq | 1296 | 1534 18% | 503 -61% | 2000 54% | 1216 -6% | 1977 53% | 1212 ? -6% |
Read Seq | 1445 | 1464 1% | 1306 -10% | 2206 53% | 1291 -11% | 2207 53% | 1372 ? -5% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 545 | 435.5 -20% | 237.3 -56% | 451.2 -17% | 401.5 -26% | 510 -6% | 338 ? -38% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 687 | 554 -19% | 287.4 -58% | 351 -49% | 491.4 -28% | 387.8 -44% | 491 ? -29% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1483 | 2984 101% | 1242 -16% | 2982 101% | 1224 -17% | 2986 101% | 1343 ? -9% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2334 | 3557 52% | 2480 6% | 3529 51% | 2314 -1% | 3540 52% | 2279 ? -2% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 1444 | ||||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1052 | ||||||
AS SSD | 58% | -29% | 45% | 12% | 57% | -23% | |
Seq Read | 1898 | 2724 44% | 1096 -42% | 2188 15% | 2030 7% | 2861 51% | 1927 ? 2% |
Seq Write | 1065 | 2344 120% | 305 -71% | 1320 24% | 1071 1% | 1321 24% | 1014 ? -5% |
4K Read | 58 | 56.8 -2% | 62.3 7% | 53.5 -8% | 49.16 -15% | 52.5 -9% | 43.6 ? -25% |
4K Write | 200.7 | 148.3 -26% | 110.7 -45% | 123.7 -38% | 117.3 -42% | 196.7 -2% | 134 ? -33% |
4K-64 Read | 580 | 1238 113% | 393.7 -32% | 1010 74% | 1268 119% | 1153 99% | 684 ? 18% |
4K-64 Write | 779 | 1638 110% | 438.5 -44% | 1808 132% | 699 -10% | 1807 132% | 544 ? -30% |
Access Time Read * | 0.052 | 0.035 33% | 0.078 -50% | 0.055 -6% | 0.067 -29% | 0.064 -23% | 0.1175 ? -126% |
Access Time Write * | 0.16 | 0.025 84% | 0.045 72% | 0.076 52% | 0.168 -5% | 0.018 89% | 0.2153 ? -35% |
Score Read | 828 | 1567 89% | 566 -32% | 1282 55% | 1520 84% | 1491 80% | 920 ? 11% |
Score Write | 1087 | 2021 86% | 580 -47% | 2063 90% | 923 -15% | 2136 97% | 779 ? -28% |
Score Total | 2316 | 4381 89% | 1420 -39% | 3970 71% | 3179 37% | 4322 87% | 2135 ? -8% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1659 | 2191 32% | 1644 -1% | 1308 ? -21% | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 519 | 570 10% | 920 77% | 363 ? -30% | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 872 | 1131 30% | 1725 98% | 719 ? -18% | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% /
41% | -24% /
-25% | 29% /
34% | -3% /
-1% | 37% /
40% | -22% /
-22% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
The efficient i7-1160G7 UP4 Tiger Lake processor is also equipped with the fast Iris Xe Graphics G7 with 96 EUs. Compared to regular UP3 chips, however, the maximum core clock of the GPU is lower at 1100 MHz (1300 MHz @ Core i7-1165G7). The iGPU benefits from the fast quad-channel memory. Depending on the benchmark, the X1 Titanium Yoga is between 7-17% slower than the average score for the Xe Graphics G7 in our database. The less expensive Core i5-1130G7 UP4 chip is equipped with the slightly slower version of the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80 EUs).
The iGPU is well-suited for everyday tasks and thanks to the efficient video decoder, it handles high resolution playback with ease. We can also see a big improvement, because while the GPU load during the playback of a 4K YouTube video was more than 50% with the old UHD Graphics, we can now see little more than 30%. AMD's iGPUs are also beaten in this regard (more than 60% GPU load). The Intel iGPU supports Quick Sync, so it is possible to encode videos efficiently if the software supports it.
Similar to the CPU performance we can see a GPU performance drop after a while. The 3DMark Fire Strike stress test is not passed at 83.6%, so there is a deficit of ~16%. The performance is identical on battery power. More benchmarks with the Iris Xe Graphics G7 and comparisons with other iGPUs are available here.
3DMark 11 Performance | 5951 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3987 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1415 points | |
Help |
Gaming Performance
The new Iris Xe Graphics G7 can handle some games, but the performance will drop a bit after a couple of minutes. You should focus on less demanding or older titles. F1 2020, for example, only runs smoothly at low settings, while you can use our medium preset for Witcher 3 and DOTA 2. More gaming benchmarks for the Iris Xe Graphics are available in our tech section.
low | med. | high | ultra | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 56 | 40.7 | 22.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 82.9 | 45.2 | 34 | 33.2 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 34.4 | 28.6 | 25.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 26 | 15 | ||
F1 2020 (2020) | 49 | 33 |
Emissions - Lenovo uses reduced version of the speakers
System Noise
Both the X1 Nano as well as the X1 Titanium Yoga use one fan, but the heat pipe of the X1 Titanium Yoga is much smaller. The lower cooling solution is therefore not surprising, but it also affects the fan. Depending on the performance profile, the fan will spin up pretty quickly in short peak load situations, even though the murmur is not annoying. The overall noise level is even a bit lower compared to the X1 Nano, and the maximum noise during the stress test is not sustained for a long time. As soon as the TDP has leveled off at 12W, the fan noise drops from 35.8 dB(A) to 32.7 dB(A). We did not hear any other electronic noises.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.1 / 25.1 / 27.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.7 / 35.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.1 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -9% | -2% | -10% | -12% | -5% | |
off / environment * | 25.1 | 29.4 -17% | 29.5 -18% | 25.8 -3% | 29.4 -17% | 28.7 -14% | 24.9 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.1 | 29.4 -17% | 29.5 -18% | 25.9 -3% | 29.4 -17% | 28.7 -14% | 24.9 1% |
Idle Average * | 25.1 | 29.4 -17% | 30 -20% | 25.9 -3% | 29.4 -17% | 28.7 -14% | 26.3 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.1 | 30.6 -13% | 30.3 -12% | 25.9 4% | 30.7 -13% | 30.6 -13% | 31.8 -17% |
Load Average * | 32.7 | 33.7 -3% | 31.6 3% | 26.4 19% | 32.6 -0% | 37.3 -14% | 34.3 -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.7 | 36.9 -13% | 37.3 -14% | 34.3 -5% | |||
Load Maximum * | 35.8 | 33.7 6% | 31.6 12% | 41.5 -16% | 33.7 6% | 37.3 -4% | 37.5 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The thin chassis is a factor when we look at the surface temperatures, because the area around the mainboard (above the key F2-F8) is already a couple of degrees warmer than the rest of the chassis while idling. This is also the hot spot under load. We can measure slightly more than 45 °C, which is clearly perceptible, but there are still no limitations. You can still put the device on your lap and both the kayboard as well as the palm rests stay much cooler. Overall, the surface temperatures are quite high considering the low TDP, it looks like Lenovo prefers a quieter fan noise.
We can record a maximum power consumption of almost 39W at the beginning of the stress test, and the iGPU consumes 19W. However, the chip temperature immediate rises to 90 °C and the system reduces the performance. Similar to pure CPU load, the TDP quickly levels off at 12W. 6-7W are for the processor (4x 930 MHz) and about 5W (~450 MHz) for the graphics card. The chip temperature levels off at around 70 °C.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-0.3 °C / -0.5 F).
Speakers - Dolby Atmos with two modules
There is also a bit difference in terms of speakers between the X1 Nano (4 speakers) and the X1 Titanium Yoga, where Lenovo only uses two speakers. They are located next to the keyboard and direct the sound towards the user, at least when you are using the convertible as a laptop. The will direct the sound towards the back in tent mode and you will probably cover them with your hands when you use it as a tablet.
The lack of two additional speakers is also clearly noticeable. The Xi Titanium Yoga is quieter than the X1 Nano and the sound is just not as rich and powerful. The result is not bad and still superior to many business laptops, but it could have been better.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management - X1 with small battery
Power Consumption
Due to the higher screen resolution, the idle consumption is a bit higher compared to the other devices. The keyboard illumination is also noticeable at more than 2W at the highest settings, so we would recommend you only use the lower intensity on battery power, which increases the consumption by just ~0.4W.
We can see a maximum consumption of 57.1W during the stress test, but it quickly drops and levels off at ~24W. The included 65W power adapter (8.8 x 5 x 2.1 cm) is therefore completely sufficient and there is plenty of headroom to charge the battery when you stress the laptop.
Off / Standby | 0.28 / 0.53 Watt |
Idle | 3.9 / 7.3 / 10.3 Watt |
Load |
30.6 / 57.1 Watt |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.50 | Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, a-SI IPS LED, 2560x1600, 13.30 | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -1% | 13% | 2% | 10% | -18% | -23% | -25% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 2.9 26% | 3.5 10% | 3 23% | 2.9 26% | 4.3 -10% | 5.26 ? -35% | 5.44 ? -39% |
Idle Average * | 7.3 | 6 18% | 5.1 30% | 5.1 30% | 5.8 21% | 7.1 3% | 8.46 ? -16% | 8.27 ? -13% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.3 | 9.6 7% | 8.1 21% | 6.4 38% | 9.6 7% | 9.8 5% | 10.6 ? -3% | 10.8 ? -5% |
Load Average * | 30.6 | 42.6 -39% | 35.6 -16% | 39.6 -29% | 34.6 -13% | 41.8 -37% | 44.8 ? -46% | 46.7 ? -53% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 25.5 | 39.6 -55% | 41 -61% | |||||
Load Maximum * | 57.1 | 67.3 -18% | 44.7 22% | 56.2 2% | 50.7 11% | 60.9 -7% | 66.6 ? -17% | 65.5 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtime
Lenovo can only fit a 44.5 Wh battery inside the thin chassis, which obviously has an effect on the runtime. At maximum load and the highest brightness, the battery will drain completely in under two hours. Our practical Wi-Fi test at 150 cd/m² runs for almost 8.5 hours and little more than 6 hours at the maximum brightness. The runtime will be even shorter when you use the LTE connection, where the Wi-Fi test only ran for ~5.5 hours at the maximum brightness.
Our video test once again shows the improved efficiency of the iGPU, because our video loop at 150 cd/m² runs for ~11.5 hours.
A full charge takes 161 minutes when the device is turned on. 50% of the capacity are available after ~55 minutes, but the charge curve will flatten noticeably for the remaining 50%.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 44.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 66 Wh | Fujitsu LifeBook U9310X i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon 13 ITL i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 50 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 6% | 24% | 35% | 51% | -9% | 11% | |
H.264 | 685 | 556 -19% | 717 5% | 559 -18% | 769 ? 12% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 506 | 654 29% | 605 20% | 707 40% | 694 37% | 480 -5% | 567 ? 12% |
Load | 112 | 120 7% | 166 48% | 145 29% | 185 65% | 106 -5% | 121.8 ? 9% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict - High-End Convertible with limitations
The new X1 Titanium Yoga leaves mixed impressions after the review. It certainly looks good and it is an eye-catcher with the bright color. The fact that it is the thinnest ThinkPad so far also looks good on paper, but the footprint is pretty big in practice due to the deep chassis. Our test unit also has some build quality issues, which is surprising considering the high retail price.
Like on the X1 Nano, Lenovo uses a very efficient Tiger Lake processor from Intel, which requires less space. However, the cooling solution of the X1 Titanium Yoga is less powerful, so the CPU performance is lower. There is still plenty of power for everyday tasks and it is a very responsive convertible. Lenovo also implements a keyboard with reduced key travel (1.35 mm), which is worse compared to the rest of the ThinkPad line-up. We are also not happy with the clickpad.
You will have to accept some compromises if you want the thinnest ThinkPad. The 3:2 screen is very good, but we are not sure it justifies the higher price compared to a regular ThinkPad X1 Yoga.
All in all, it is a good business convertible with a very good 3:2 screen, but you should consider if it is worth the additional charge over the standard ThinkPad X1 Yoga, which will soon be available with a 16:10 display. It also offers a superior keyboard, has more ports, and is more affordable.
Price and Availability
You can configure the ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga at lenovo.com starting from $1769.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE
-
04/06/2021 v7
Andreas Osthoff