Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarHuawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Tiger Lake Laptop Review: Now Shipping Worldwide ↺
In contrast to the budget MateBook D series, the higher-end 3:2 MateBook X series is Huawei's flagship lineup of ultrathin prosumer laptops akin to the Dell XPS, HP Spectre, Asus ZenBook, or Lenovo Yoga series. Its latest 2021 model is an internal revision of the 2020 model with both a new cooling solution and a new Intel 11th gen processor to replace the older Comet Lake-U and GeForce MX options, respectively.
We recommend checking out our reviews on the 2020 and 2019 MateBook X Pro models as the 2021 model is visually very similar to its immediate predecessors. Direct competitors include the XPS 13 9310, HP Spectre x360 13, Asus ZenBook 13, or Lenovo Yoga Slim 7.
More Huawei reviews:
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.8 % | 03/2021 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 13.90" | 3000x2000 | |
| 87.4 % | 06/2020 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 13.90" | 3000x2000 | |
| 87.4 % | 12/2020 | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 3840x2400 | |
| 84 % | 02/2020 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 85.5 % | 10/2020 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.4 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.3 % | 08/2020 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Case
The 2021 model is externally identical to the 2020 model and so our existing comments still apply. Despite the hand-me-down chassis design, the MateBook X Pro is still as thin and light as any other flagship Ultrabook available. The newer 13.5-inch HP Spectre x360 14, for example, is thicker and with nearly the same footprint even though the Huawei carries a slightly larger display. Chassis rigidity is still good, but it's definitely not as firm as the Razer Blade Stealth or aforementioned Spectre.
Connectivity
Both USB-C ports have been upgraded to support Thunderbolt speeds. However, we're currently waiting on confirmation from Huawei to find out if the laptop supports Thunderbolt 4 or only Thunderbolt 3. Port options are otherwise the same as on last year's model. The integrated USB-A port is great especially since it is becoming more uncommon, but the lack of a Kensington Lock is a downer.
Communication
Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 are provided by the Intel AX201. Transfer rates are steady and we experienced no connectivity issues during our time with the test unit.
Killer USB-C Ethernet Adapter - Upgrade to a stable connection
Despite advances in wireless networking, Ethernet is still the top choice for gamers and power users. The Killer 2.5G Ethernet to USB-C Adapter enables seamless Ethernet connectivity with full 2.5 Gbps throughput. It also brings the best of Killer technologies including the much acclaimed Killer Prioritization Engine, GameFast, Extreme Mode, and Intelligence Engine that ensure your favorite game or app gets the bandwidth and priority it deserves. For laptops already equipped with a Killer wireless card, Killer DoubleShot Pro offers bandwidth doubling and fine-grained control over network packets passing through each connection.
In our testing, the Killer 2.5G Ethernet Adapter lived up to the advertised speeds consistently throughout testing. You can read more about performance comparison with other USB Ethernet Adapters in our article.
The Killer 2.5G Ethernet to USB-C adapter can be purchased on Amazon for US$ 49.99
Webcam
Huawei has been using the same pop-up webcam for over three years. Not only is the video quality poor, but the angle is awful. The webcam becomes unusable if the laptop is on one's lap, for example. The "pop-up" design is embarrassingly outdated at this point when compared to the latest Ultrabooks from Dell or HP.
Maintenance
The bottom panel is secured by T5 Torx screws with none hidden underneath the rubber footing. Servicing is difficult because of the tight latches and very sharp edges; a plastic edge like a credit card is absolutely recommended for this reason. Once inside, users can only upgrade the M.2 SSD as both the WLAN and RAM modules are soldered.
Accessories and Warranty
There are no extras in the box other than the AC adapter and paperwork. The usual manufacturer warranty applies, but claiming said warranty may be difficult if you live in regions where the MateBook X Pro is not officially sold.
Input Devices
Keyboard
The keyboard suffers from the same drawbacks as most other Ultrabooks: shallow travel and somewhat soft feedback. Its Space key in particular could have benefited from stronger feedback. The overall feel of the keyboard is most similar to the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i. Other laptops like the Lenovo ThinkPad T series or HP Spectre/EliteBook are slightly thicker, but they also carry more comfortable keyboards with deeper travel and more satisfying feedback.
Touchpad
The roomy clickpad is larger than the clickpad on the XPS 13 9310 (12 x 7.7 cm vs. 11.2 x 6.5 cm) for comfortable cursor control and multi-touch inputs. Its gliding properties are extremely smooth with essentially no sticking even when moving at very slow speeds. This may not be ideal, however, as some users may find the clickpad to be too slippery as a result.
The integrated click keys are difficult to use. Travel is probably the shallowest we've ever seen on any laptop and usability suffers because of it. Feedback is spongy and the auditory click is so soft that it's difficult to know if our inputs are even being registered. Huawei definitely dropped the bomb in this aspect.
Display
The 2021 MateBook X Pro is using the same 3000 x 2000 TIANMA XM IPS touchscreen as the 2018 model. Both laptops even share the same TLX1388 controller. Despite its age, this is still a high-end panel worthy of any flagship Ultrabook with its high contrast ratio, bright backlight, vibrant colors, and excellent color accuracy. Its main disadvantage continues to be the slow response times meaning ghosting is particularly noticeable especially if gaming. Fortunately, the target audience won't be using this machine for much gaming, anyway.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 502 cd/m²
Contrast: 1521:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.35 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
94.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 TIANMA XM, IPS, 13.90, 3000x2000 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 JDI LPM139M422A, LTPS, 13.90, 3000x2000 | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K Sharp LQ134R1, IPS, 13.40, 3840x2400 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Sharp LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 13.50, 2256x1504 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Sharp LQ133M1JW46, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | 16% | 2% | 2% | 8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.9 | 66.6 3% | 80.2 24% | 65.7 1% | 66 2% | 71.7 10% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.4 | 99.4 5% | 100 6% | 98.6 4% | 97.4 3% | 99.3 5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.3 | 68.6 3% | 78.9 19% | 67.8 2% | 67.1 1% | 72.9 10% |
| Response Times | -25% | -55% | -58% | -48% | -17% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.6 ? | 49.6 ? -32% | 59.2 ? -57% | 59.2 ? -57% | 57.6 ? -53% | 45.6 ? -21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 ? | 30.8 ? -17% | 40.4 ? -53% | 41.6 ? -58% | 37.6 ? -42% | 29.6 ? -12% |
| PWM Frequency | 29070 ? | 2137 ? | 21740 ? | |||
| Screen | 8% | -23% | 5% | -19% | -45% | |
| Brightness middle | 502 | 557 11% | 508.7 1% | 403.4 -20% | 356.8 -29% | 399.6 -20% |
| Brightness | 474 | 532 12% | 479 1% | 397 -16% | 336 -29% | 385 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 84 -6% | 89 0% | 88 -1% | 89 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.33 -0% | 0.3 9% | 0.34 -3% | 0.34 -3% | 0.37 -12% |
| Contrast | 1521 | 1688 11% | 1696 12% | 1186 -22% | 1049 -31% | 1080 -29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.35 | 1.4 -4% | 2.72 -101% | 0.94 30% | 1.63 -21% | 3.2 -137% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.67 | 2.5 32% | 4.7 -28% | 2.92 20% | 5.03 -37% | 6.44 -75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 0.7 42% | 1.92 -60% | 0.99 17% | 1.08 10% | 1.73 -44% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2 -18% | 3.4 -100% | 0.9 47% | 3 -76% | 4.7 -176% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.14 103% | 2.11 104% | 2.13 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6440 101% | 6689 97% | 6245 104% | 6620 98% | 6434 101% | 7184 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.1 | 62.5 2% | 70.7 16% | 62.3 2% | 62 1% | 66.3 9% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94.3 | 99.5 6% | 100 6% | 98.7 5% | 97.6 3% | 99.5 6% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
3% | -21% /
-19% | -17% /
-3% | -22% /
-19% | -18% /
-32% |
* ... smaller is better
Color space covers >95 percent of sRGB not unlike most high-end Ultrabooks. We hope to see OLED options in the future for even deeper AdobeRGB and DCI-P3 colors.
X-Rite colorimeter measurements show a well-calibrated display out of the box with average grayscale and ColorChecker deltaE values of just 1.7 and 1.2, respectively. An end-user calibration is not necessary.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19454 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Outdoor visibility is most similar to the XPS 13 9310 while being better than the Razer Blade Stealth and Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 since the Huawei display is much brighter. Maximum brightness will not drop even if running on battery power.
Performance
Older MateBook X Pro models would ship with Intel Core U-series CPUs and optional GeForce MX graphics. Thus, it was only natural that the 2021 model would move on to Tiger Lake-U and integrated Iris Xe graphics. The new Intel iGPU solution is significantly more powerful than any UHD Graphics laptop while being more power efficient than the GeForce MX. Huawei offers no AMD options except on the lesser MateBook D or MagicBook series.
SKUs with the slower Core i5-1135G7 are available which should be more affordable than our costlier Core i7 configuration.
We appreciate the clean OS and lack of bloatware or manufacturer software on the Huawei. Other major OEMs like Lenovo and Dell often have a handful of specialized software on top of the usual Windows settings.
Processor
CPU performance is a mixed bag. On one hand, the new Core i7-1165G7 processor is certainly faster than the older Comet Lake-U Core i7-10510U and Whiskey Lake-U Core i7-8550U as found on older MateBook X Pro models especially in terms of single-thread performance. On the other hand, the Core i7-1165G7 in the 2021 MateBook X Pro is noticeably slower than other laptops equipped with the same CPU. Multi-thread CineBench scores are 20 to 25 percent lower than the average Core i7-1165G7 laptop in our database to be slower than even the cheaper Ice Lake Core i5-1035G7. This is disappointing but perhaps unsurprising given that previous MateBook X Pro models also had underperforming CPUs.
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.4: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.4: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
| PCMark 10 Score | 4870 points | |
Help | ||
DPC Latency
LatencyMon shows slight DPC latency issues when opening multiple tabs on our homepage. 4K video playback at 60 FPS is otherwise smooth with very low GPU utilization and no dropped frames during our minute-long YouTube test.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Huawei sources multiple SSD manufacturers for its MateBook series including Samsung, Western Digital, Lite-On, and Toshiba. Our test unit comes with the Samsung PM981a which is a common NVMe SSD on high-end gaming laptops. We're hopeful that future MateBook X Pro models will support PCIe 4.0 much like on the Vaio Z.
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -6% | -41% | -60% | -12% | -14% | |
| Seq Read | 2794 | 2737 -2% | 2144 -23% | 1387 -50% | 2353 -16% | 1658 -41% |
| Seq Write | 2385 | 2530 6% | 1389 -42% | 504 -79% | 1625 -32% | 2464 3% |
| 4K Read | 60.7 | 54 -11% | 49.77 -18% | 42.35 -30% | 57.5 -5% | 59.5 -2% |
| 4K Write | 180.8 | 152.5 -16% | 105 -42% | 120 -34% | 189.3 5% | 128.6 -29% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1768 | 2011 14% | 855 -52% | 497.4 -72% | 1169 -34% | 1576 -11% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1800 | 1260 -30% | 1660 -8% | 354.9 -80% | 1778 -1% | 1986 10% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.037 | 0.066 -78% | 0.058 -57% | 0.055 -49% | 0.05 -35% | 0.049 -32% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.073 | 0.024 67% | 0.272 -273% | 0.093 -27% | 0.058 21% | 0.087 -19% |
| Score Read | 2108 | 2339 11% | 1119 -47% | 678 -68% | 1462 -31% | 1802 -15% |
| Score Write | 2219 | 1666 -25% | 1904 -14% | 525 -76% | 2130 -4% | 2361 6% |
| Score Total | 5392 | 5191 -4% | 3570 -34% | 1520 -72% | 4316 -20% | 5133 -5% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2065 | 1929 -7% | 764 -63% | 2073 0% | 1588 -23% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 734 | 1012 38% | 256.1 -65% | 673 -8% | 550 -25% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1629 | 1737 7% | 368.4 -77% | 1568 -4% | 1329 -18% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -14% | -27% | -49% | -13% | -5% | |
| Write 4K | 197.5 | 165.6 -16% | 86 -56% | 112.3 -43% | 151.1 -23% | 146.1 -26% |
| Read 4K | 52.9 | 50.2 -5% | 40.11 -24% | 42.13 -20% | 35.78 -32% | 47.18 -11% |
| Write Seq | 2174 | 1905 -12% | 1738 -20% | 630 -71% | 2122 -2% | 2896 33% |
| Read Seq | 2156 | 1669 -23% | 1553 -28% | 1023 -53% | 2403 11% | 2754 28% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 632 | 474.6 -25% | 454.9 -28% | 336.6 -47% | 528 -16% | 425.8 -33% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 694 | 508 -27% | 385.4 -44% | 399.6 -42% | 430.2 -38% | 514 -26% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3017 | 3007 0% | 2784 -8% | 821 -73% | 2986 -1% | 2989 -1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3561 | 3556 0% | 3217 -10% | 2030 -43% | 3540 -1% | 3568 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-9% | -34% /
-36% | -55% /
-56% | -13% /
-12% | -10% /
-11% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
Iris Xe graphics performance is where we expect it to be which is a relief considering the below-average CPU performance recorded above. Users upgrading from laptops with UHD Graphics will see large improvements in all aspects especially for light graphics editing. For gaming, however, the discrete GeForce MX150 or MX250 will still be the superior options for more consistent frame rates and better compatibility. 3DMark results are particularly misleading here as they show our Huawei significantly outperforming the GeForce MX250 even though real-world gaming performance tells a completely different story.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6234 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15620 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4401 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1572 points | |
Help | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn | |
| 1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (98.4 - 186, n=6) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (75.8 - 148, n=20) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (67.9 - 152, n=42) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (71 - 131, n=21) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (36 - 148, n=151) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (81.6 - 134.4, n=19) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (53 - 73, n=10) | |
| 1366x768 med (1/3) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (69.1 - 136, n=20) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (82.9 - 162, n=6) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (21.8 - 109, n=21) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (49.9 - 122.3, n=42) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (62.6 - 119.5, n=19) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (31.6 - 108.5, n=151) | |