Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

HP EliteBook 830 G8 business laptop in review: The 1,000-nit SureView panel remains problematic

Now also with 5G. HP's EliteBook 830 compact subnotebook gets a new Tiger Lake processor in its 8th generation, but it sticks with the familiar 16:9 displays. The 1,000-nits SureView monitor protects users from prying eyes, but it continues to have an impact on image quality.
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 🇩🇪 🇨🇳 ...

Following last year's comprehensive update of the HP EliteBook 830, the changes in the 8th generation are limited to new processors and some connectivity features. The compact business subnotebook is available with Intel's latest Tiger Lake processors as well as with AMD's Ryzen 5000 chips in the 835 G8 model.

Our test device has the 3C7Y8EA model number and is very comprehensively equipped. For around 2,900 Euros (~$3,410), customers get the Core i7-1165G7 processor, 32 GB of RAM, a 1 TB PCIe SSD, and an integrated 5G modem. In addition, the particularly bright 1,000-nit monitor is built in, and it offers an integrated privacy filter (SureView). In the lowest configuration variant (Core i5, 8 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD), the EliteBook 830 G8 is available starting at roughly 1,300 Euros (~$1,528).

HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Processor
Intel Core i7-1165G7 4 x 2.8 - 4.7 GHz, 46 W PL2 / Short Burst, 20 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake UP3
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, X133NVFF R0, IPS, SureView, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB 
, 900 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 0 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, Snapdragon X55, 5G
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 308 x 205 ( = 0.71 x 12.13 x 8.07 in)
Battery
53 Wh, 4400 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65-watt power adapter (USB-C), HP Tools, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.329 kg ( = 46.88 oz / 2.93 pounds), Power Supply: 310 g ( = 10.93 oz / 0.68 pounds)
Price
2,900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
08/2021
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg18 mm13.30"1920x1080
89.3 %
07/2021
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg18.2 mm13.30"1920x1200
84.7 %
05/2021
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg14.5 mm13.50"2256x1504
87.8 %
03/2021
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg14.6 mm13.90"3000x2000
87.4 %
12/2020
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg14.8 mm13.40"3840x2400

Case - EliteBook with premium aluminum case

After the EliteBook 830 received a completely new case only last year in its 7th generation, no changes have been made this year. The aluminum case still looks very high-end, and it's perfectly manufactured. The stability is very high, both for the base unit and the display lid. We especially like the central hinge, since the lid can be opened easily with one hand, but at the same time, it's firm enough to effectively prevent the lid from wobbling. The maximum opening angle is around 160 degrees.

The EliteBook's design looks very sober, and the combination of the silver case and black contrasting elements (keyboard, display bezel) is appropriate for both consumers and business users. The display bezel became narrower with the last case update, but it's still quite wide at the top and bottom of the panel in particular. This shows that HP is still using 16:9 panels, while many competitors have already switched back to the 16:10 format. Nonetheless, the EliteBook 830 G8 looks very modern overall.

The EliteBook 830 G8 is one of the most compact models in our comparison group; only the XPS 13 has a slightly smaller footprint. On the other hand, our competitors don't differ much in terms of weight (all ~1.3 kg).

Size comparison

308 mm / 12.1 inch 205 mm / 8.07 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 1.3 kg2.93 lbs307.9 mm / 12.1 inch 204.5 mm / 8.05 inch 18.1 mm / 0.713 inch 1.3 kg2.84 lbs305.8 mm / 12 inch 217.1 mm / 8.55 inch 18.2 mm / 0.717 inch 1.3 kg2.95 lbs308 mm / 12.1 inch 223 mm / 8.78 inch 14.5 mm / 0.571 inch 1.3 kg2.97 lbs304 mm / 12 inch 217 mm / 8.54 inch 14.6 mm / 0.575 inch 1.3 kg2.89 lbs296 mm / 11.7 inch 199 mm / 7.83 inch 14.8 mm / 0.583 inch 1.3 kg2.78 lbs

Connectivity - HP offers an optional 5G modem

The port layout remains the same, but the update to the Tiger Lake processor also adds the new Thunderbolt 4 ports (USB 4, 40 Gb/s). HP continues to include the familiar power supply port for older power adapters, but the included power adapter uses USB-C.

Left: Kensington Lock, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, 3,5 mm audio jack, smart card reader
Left: Kensington Lock, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, 3,5 mm audio jack, smart card reader
Right: Nano SIM, 2x USB-C with Thunderbolt 4 (USB 4, 40 Gb/s, DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery), HDMI 2.0b, power supply
Right: Nano SIM, 2x USB-C with Thunderbolt 4 (USB 4, 40 Gb/s, DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery), HDMI 2.0b, power supply

Communication

Just like the predecessor, Intel's Wireless AX201 WLAN module is also used here. The transfer rates in our test with the Netgear Nighthawk RAX120 reference router are very good, and all the important standards including Bluetooth 5.2 are supported. However, some competitors already provide faster Wi-Fi 6E modules.

Optionally, HP also offers LTE or 5G modems. Our test device supports 5G (Snapdragon X55) and operates either with an eSIM or also with a nano SIM. Our test nano SIM card from Deutsche Telekom was detected immediately and was functional. Reception was better than with a smartphone, and even indoors in the city, we were still able to reach speeds of 80-90 Mb/s.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1602 (1477min - 1662max) MBit/s ∼100% +12%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1430 (1283min - 1491max) MBit/s ∼89%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1380 (667min - 1483max) MBit/s ∼86% -3%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1365 (955min - 1588max) MBit/s ∼85% -5%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=322)
1162 MBit/s ∼73% -19%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1129 (947min - 1229max) MBit/s ∼70% -21%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
984 (796min - 1076max) MBit/s ∼61% -31%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (180 - 1614, n=100, last 2 years)
979 MBit/s ∼61% -32%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1547 (819min - 1624max) MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1524 (1322min - 1649max) MBit/s ∼99% +10%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1501 (1471min - 1536max) MBit/s ∼97% +8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1401 (1271min - 1454max) MBit/s ∼91% +1%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1390 (699min - 1462max) MBit/s ∼90%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1387 (1329min - 1458max) MBit/s ∼90% 0%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=322)
1261 MBit/s ∼82% -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (182 - 1690, n=100, last 2 years)
1099 MBit/s ∼71% -21%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1366 (699-1462)
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1524 (1322-1649)
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1431 (1283-1491)
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1602 (1477-1662)

Webcam

There are no changes to report in the webcam department. A 720p module with a mechanical shutter is still used, and it doesn't provide a particularly good picture quality, even in good lighting conditions. An IR camera for the use of Windows Hello is available as well.

ColorChecker
8.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
0.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
ColorChecker HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7: 10.41 ∆E min: 0.59 - max: 19.13 ∆E

Security

The subject of security is very important in the EliteBook lineup of laptops. Out of the box, there are already several comprehensive software solutions and, of course, features like a TPM 2.0 chip as well as a fingerprint scanner and, optionally, a smart card reader. In addition, both the EliteBook 830 G8 and 835 G8 are equipped by HP with processors that offer advanced security and administration features (Intel vPro and AMD Ryzen Pro, respectively).

Maintenance

The bottom cover is only secured with a few cross-head screws and can be removed very easily. Both the RAM and the M.2-2280 SSD are found under additional covers, but these can be easily removed. The fact that a compact subnotebook still offers two SODIMM slots instead of soldered RAM has become a rarity. The two communication modules (WLAN and WWAN) can be replaced too.

Interior
Interior
Interior
Interior

Input devices - 830 G8 with reliable keyboard

The black chiclet keyboard has basically remained unchanged and is still one of the best input devices in the mobile segment. Since Lenovo has implemented the poorer keyboard with shorter travel in the ThinkPad X13, for example, the two competitors are at least on par in this regard now; subjectively, we actually like the EliteBook's keyboard a little better. Thanks to the two-stage white backlight, it's also possible to work in darker environments without any issues.

The PointStick and its dedicated mouse buttons were removed in the EliteBook 830 G7. The ClickPad can be used without problems, but it's not particularly large by modern standards at 11 x 6.3 cm. You can click it in the lower area, to which the ClickPad responds with a muffled and sophisticated noise.

Input devices
Input devices
Keyboard backlight
Keyboard backlight

Display - SureView with 1,000 nits

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

As mentioned before, HP is still using the familiar 13.3-inch displays in the 16:9 format. Our test device is equipped with the optional SureView panel that comes with an integrated privacy filter; it's supposed to achieve a brightness of 1,000 cd/m². According to our measurements, we can confirm this, but as with earlier SureView panels, there are some issues. SureView only works in the lower brightness range and is therefore hardly of use in bright environments. In addition, the brightness adjustments become a mess when you enable SureView by pressing the corresponding key. We've gathered the measured brightness levels in the following table:

Helligkeitmessung in cd/m²
Brightness 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Normal 1,007 773 607 489 405 345 285 235 188 145 108
SureView 110 102 94 85 76 69 60 52 26 16 3.5

The brightness sensor and the Intel GPU driver's power-saving options are deactivated for our measurements, but we were still able to register different values (maximum around 250 cd/m²) when SureView was enabled; however, the values weren't always reproducible. In general, this configuration (SureView only working at the lowest spectrum of brightness) is problematic because you're practically forced to use SureView in darker environments, since the minimum brightness of over 100 cd/m² is otherwise too high.

Minor screen bleeding
Minor screen bleeding

The subjective image impression of the panel is not good, since even with the SureView function disabled, the viewing angles are limited, and even small deviations from the central sweet spot (both vertically and horizontally) lead to a significantly noticeable loss of brightness and contrast, respectively. In addition, bright areas look a bit grainy. We weren't able to detect PWM, and screen bleeding isn't a big issue despite the high brightness.

1040
cd/m²
1011
cd/m²
940
cd/m²
1014
cd/m²
1007
cd/m²
903
cd/m²
965
cd/m²
1006
cd/m²
977
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X133NVFF R0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1040 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 984.8 cd/m² Minimum: 107 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 1004 cd/m²
Contrast: 2962:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 2.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
X133NVFF R0, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
NV133WUM-N61, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.30
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
TIANMA XM, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Sharp LQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Chi Mei CMN13A9, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Display
3%
-3%
-4%
11%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
69.2
71.1
3%
64.7
-7%
64.9
-6%
80.2
16%
65.7
-5%
sRGB Coverage
94.5
99.7
6%
97.2
3%
94.4
0%
100
6%
97.4
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
71.1
71.1
0%
66.9
-6%
66.3
-7%
78.9
11%
67.4
-5%
Response Times
38%
-37%
14%
-34%
-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45 ?(20, 25)
30.8 ?(14.8, 16)
32%
62.8 ?(30.4, 32.4)
-40%
37.6 ?(17.6, 20)
16%
59.2 ?(30, 29.2)
-32%
46.8 ?(24, 22.8)
-4%
Response Time Black / White *
30 ?(17, 13)
17.2 ?(8.4, 8.8)
43%
39.8 ?(21.2, 18)
-33%
26.4 ?(11.6, 14.8)
12%
40.4 ?(22.4, 18)
-35%
32 ?(15.6, 16.4)
-7%
PWM Frequency
21930 ?(50)
2137 ?(31)
26600 ?(62)
Screen
-5%
3%
10%
-2%
-2%
Brightness middle
1007
320
-68%
413
-59%
502
-50%
508.7
-49%
454.5
-55%
Brightness
985
310
-69%
400
-59%
474
-52%
479
-51%
435
-56%
Brightness Distribution
87
89
2%
94
8%
89
2%
84
-3%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.34
0.24
29%
0.29
15%
0.33
3%
0.3
12%
0.27
21%
Contrast
2962
1333
-55%
1424
-52%
1521
-49%
1696
-43%
1683
-43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4
2.7
32%
2.8
30%
1.35
66%
2.72
32%
3.12
22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.9
7.6
15%
7.2
19%
3.67
59%
4.7
47%
4.85
46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.4
0.9
62%
0.8
67%
1.2
50%
1.92
20%
1.97
18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.3
4.1
5%
1.9
56%
1.7
60%
3.4
21%
3.1
28%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.24 98%
2.12 104%
2.24 98%
2.11 104%
2.01 109%
CCT
6462 101%
6429 101%
6510 100%
6440 101%
6245 104%
6902 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61.6
61.1
70.7
61.5
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.2
94.3
100
97
Total Average (Program / Settings)
12% / 3%
-12% / -4%
7% / 7%
-8% / -3%
-3% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

The factory calibration isn't bad, and there's only a minor color tint that is hardly visible to the naked eye, though. With SureView enabled, however, image quality deteriorates significantly. The color deviations are larger, and grayscales now also show a much warmer color temperature in combination with a noticeable red tint.

CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Saturation
CalMAN - Saturation
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Grayscales with SureView
CalMAN - Grayscales with SureView
CalMAN - Saturation with SureView
CalMAN - Saturation with SureView
CalMAN - ColorChecker with SureView
CalMAN - ColorChecker with SureView
CalMAN - Grayscales calibrated
CalMAN - Grayscales calibrated
CalMAN - Saturation calibrated
CalMAN - Saturation calibrated
CalMAN - ColorChecker calibrated
CalMAN - ColorChecker calibrated

We can improve color reproduction a bit with our calibration (CalMAN and X-Rite i1 Pro 2), but it's not really necessary for the business environment. In addition, the high color deviation for the blue color persists, meaning that the panel is not ideal for image editing purposes. On the upside, the smaller sRGB color space coverage is close to 100%.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21941 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The matte display can still be used well even in very bright environments thanks to the high brightness, provided that you move the screen away from the sun. However, this only applies when SureView is disabled.

In sunlight (SureView disabled)
In sunlight (SureView disabled)
In sunlight (SureView disabled)
In sunlight (SureView disabled)
In sunlight (SureView enabled)
In sunlight (SureView enabled)

Overall, the viewing-angle stability is significantly worse than with other IPS displays, even with SureView off. Activating it restricts the viewing angles even further, and the person sitting next to you can hardly make out the screen's content, for example. So, in principle, it works as intended, but due to the strong limitations, we would recommend the normal Full HD panel with 400 cd/m², since you can still use an external privacy filter (foil) in that case.

Viewing angles - SureView disabled
Viewing angles - SureView disabled
Viewing angles - SureView enabled
Viewing angles - SureView enabled
Viewing angles - SureView enabled
Viewing angles - SureView enabled

Performance - Intel Tiger Lake U

Processor - Core i7-1165G7

The well-known Core i7-1165G7 operates in our test device with four cores and a maximum Turbo clock speed of up to 4.7 GHz. At the beginning, the processor is allowed to briefly consume up to 46 watts, but after a few seconds, the consumption settles at 20 watts, which corresponds to 4x ~3.0 GHz. The manufacturer opted for the conservative power limit settings for unimpressive perfomance which is not always better than the predecessor, the EliteBook 830 G7.

The CPU performance is sufficient for many tasks, especially in a business setting, but the current AMD Ryzen CPUs offer significantly more performance in multi-core applications in particular. If you can do without Thunderbolt/USB 4, the EliteBook 835 G8 would be a good alternative.

On battery power, energy consumption is limited to 15 watts after a few seconds, which explains why performance is also marginally worse (-10% to -15%). Further CPU benchmarks can be found here.

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

060120180240300360420480540600660720780840900960102010801140Tooltip
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø700 (674.81-726.07)
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø827 (741.02-973.71)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø817 (747.26-967.7)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø611 (464.15-634.96)
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø714 (631.55-870.74)
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U: Ø1118 (1104.42-1160.36)
CPU measurements during the Cinebench R15 Multi loop
CPU measurements during the Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1526 Points ∼100% +12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1525 Points ∼100% +12%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1440 Points ∼94% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1110 - 1539, n=57)
1423 Points ∼93% +4%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1365 Points ∼89%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1350 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (409 - 1663, n=72, last 2 years)
1320 Points ∼87% -3%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (965 - 12181, n=74, last 2 years)
5755 Points ∼100% +52%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5750 Points ∼100% +52%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5139 Points ∼89% +36%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (2525 - 6862, n=62)
5098 Points ∼89% +35%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5062 (4319.28min - 5062.12max) Points ∼88% +34%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4043 (3994.31min - 4043max) Points ∼70% +7%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
3786 Points ∼66%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
591 Points ∼100% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
574 Points ∼97% +14%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
567 Points ∼96% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (442 - 589, n=79)
551 Points ∼93% +9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
522 Points ∼88% +3%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
505 Points ∼85%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (157 - 633, n=110, last 2 years)
477 Points ∼81% -6%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
453 Points ∼77% -10%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
444 Points ∼75% -12%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2561 Points ∼100% +72%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2188 Points ∼85% +47%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (376 - 4704, n=109, last 2 years)
2002 Points ∼78% +34%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1060 - 2657, n=79)
1963 Points ∼77% +32%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1936 Points ∼76% +30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1912 Points ∼75% +28%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1559 Points ∼61% +5%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
1516 Points ∼59% +2%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1490 Points ∼58%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
228 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
226 Points ∼99% +2%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
221 Points ∼97%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
217.1 Points ∼95% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (115 - 230, n=76)
212 Points ∼93% -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
209 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (70.1 - 239, n=107, last 2 years)
186.2 Points ∼82% -16%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
182 Points ∼80% -18%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
175 Points ∼77% -21%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
1160 (1104.42min - 1160.36max) Points ∼100% +51%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
974 Points ∼84% +27%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
968 Points ∼83% +26%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (162 - 2041, n=115, last 2 years)
920 Points ∼79% +20%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
871 (631.55min - 870.74max) Points ∼75% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (553 - 1027, n=84)
847 Points ∼73% +10%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
769 (674.81min - 726.07max) Points ∼66%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
635 (464.15min - 634.96max) Points ∼55% -17%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
747 Seconds * ∼100% -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (253 - 2650, n=107, last 2 years)
714 Seconds * ∼96% -7%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
695 Seconds * ∼93% -4%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
666 Seconds * ∼89%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
652 Seconds * ∼87% +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
625 Seconds * ∼84% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (468 - 1138, n=78)
616 Seconds * ∼82% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
541 Seconds * ∼72% +19%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
429 Seconds * ∼57% +36%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5354 MIPS ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5274 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5233 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (4478 - 5507, n=78)
5184 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5140 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5099 MIPS ∼95% -5%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
4794 MIPS ∼90% -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2145 - 5800, n=108, last 2 years)
4541 MIPS ∼85% -15%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
4202 MIPS ∼78% -22%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
32062 MIPS ∼100% +61%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
25265 MIPS ∼79% +27%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4937 - 54374, n=108, last 2 years)
24109 MIPS ∼75% +21%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
23422 MIPS ∼73% +18%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (15347 - 27405, n=78)
22946 MIPS ∼72% +15%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
21925 MIPS ∼68% +10%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
20478 MIPS ∼64% +3%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
19919 MIPS ∼62%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
19404 MIPS ∼61% -3%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1561 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1547 Points ∼99% -1%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1546 Points ∼99% -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1533 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1302 - 1595, n=75)
1523 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1454 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (293 - 1740, n=106, last 2 years)
1276 Points ∼82% -18%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
1274 Points ∼82% -18%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
1065 Points ∼68% -32%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5791 Points ∼100% +7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5785 Points ∼100% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5653 Points ∼98% +5%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5409 Points ∼93%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5186 Points ∼90% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (3078 - 5926, n=75)
5166 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1024 - 9639, n=106, last 2 years)
4901 Points ∼85% -9%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
4616 Points ∼80% -15%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
3671 Points ∼63% -32%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
7.85 fps ∼100% +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.97 fps ∼89% +21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1.02 - 14.8, n=102, last 2 years)
6.46 fps ∼82% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1.39 - 8.47, n=78)
6.31 fps ∼80% +10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5.97 fps ∼76% +4%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.76 fps ∼73%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5.58 fps ∼71% -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.23 fps ∼67% -9%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
5.16 fps ∼66% -10%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
86.6 s * ∼100% -52%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
67.8 s * ∼78% -19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12.9 - 157, n=108, last 2 years)
62.4 s * ∼72% -9%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
57.1 s * ∼66%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
51.9 s * ∼60% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (21.5 - 88.1, n=76)
49.1 s * ∼57% +14%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
47.7 s * ∼55% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.9 s * ∼53% +20%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
44.8 s * ∼52% +22%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.501 - 1.728, n=107, last 2 years)
0.689 sec * ∼100% -23%
HP EliteBook 835 G7 23Y57EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
0.658 sec * ∼96% -17%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
0.651 sec * ∼94% -16%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.605 sec * ∼88% -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.605 sec * ∼88% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (0.552 - 1.002, n=78)
0.594 sec * ∼86% -6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.583 sec * ∼85% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.581 sec * ∼84% -4%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.561 sec * ∼81%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
769 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
101 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
221 Points
Help

System performance

Despite the somewhat modest CPU performance, the subjective impression of the system's performance is excellent. For one, this is still a powerful mobile processor, and as expected, the EliteBook is also equipped with a fast PCIe SSD, resulting in no noticeable delays when the device responds to inputs. The synthetic PCMark 10 benchmark also produces very good results.

As with some other more recent HP laptops, the system doesn't always enter standby mode smoothly. At times, you notice that the fan is still running, and in the worst case, the battery is just drained unnecessarily.

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
5105 Points ∼100% +1%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5034 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (4531 - 5454, n=49)
4961 Points ∼97% -1%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4872 Points ∼95% -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4870 Points ∼95% -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
4809 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1671 - 6414, n=102, last 2 years)
4637 Points ∼91% -8%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4185 Points ∼82% -17%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10184 Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
10065 Points ∼99% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (8997 - 11505, n=49)
10013 Points ∼98% +4%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9682 Points ∼95% 0%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9645 Points ∼95%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
9325 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4599 - 10836, n=102, last 2 years)
9061 Points ∼89% -6%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8465 Points ∼83% -12%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP EliteBook 830 G7
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6971 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
6926 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2797 - 9852, n=102, last 2 years)
6778 Points ∼97% 0%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6774 Points ∼97%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6719 Points ∼96% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5570 - 7136, n=49)
6710 Points ∼96% -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
6636 Points ∼95% -2%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6622 Points ∼95% -2%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5298 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
5180 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (4083 - 5550, n=49)
4942 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4894 Points ∼92% -8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
4879 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4583 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (973 - 6709, n=102, last 2 years)
4477 Points ∼85% -15%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
3373 Points ∼64% -36%
PCMark 10 Score
5034 points
Help

DPC latencies

In our standardized latency test (web browsing, YouTube 4K playback, CPU load), the test device shows high latency issues. As a result, it's not suitable for real-time audio applications with the current BIOS version, but this can still change with future updates. However, there were at least no dropped frames when playing the video.

LatencyMon Overview
LatencyMon Overview
LatencyMon Drivers
LatencyMon Drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1318 μs * ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1272 μs * ∼97% +3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1225 μs * ∼93% +7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
1048 μs * ∼80% +20%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
633 μs * ∼48% +52%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
603 μs * ∼46% +54%

* ... smaller is better

Storage

Although the EliteBook 830 G8 still doesn't support the new PCIe 4.0 interface, the built-in Samsung PM981a convinces with very high transfer rates. The storage capacity of 1 TB (~900 GB available after setup) should also be entirely sufficient for most users. Further SSD benchmarks are available here.

HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
3%
-38%
16%
-19%
-8%
-3%
Write 4K
133.1
171.4
29%
118.2
-11%
197.5
48%
86
-35%
118.3
-11%
139.7 ?(76.2 - 229, n=36)
5%
Read 4K
58
70.8
22%
37.54
-35%
52.9
-9%
40.11
-31%
60.4
4%
49.9 ?(34.3 - 75.5, n=36)
-14%
Write Seq
2032
1771
-13%
1017
-50%
2174
7%
1738
-14%
2067
2%
2036 ?(776 - 2975, n=35)
0%
Read Seq
2456
1755
-29%
926
-62%
2156
-12%
1553
-37%
2394
-3%
2014 ?(973 - 2639, n=35)
-18%
Write 4K Q32T1
461.9
525
14%
354.2
-23%
632
37%
454.9
-2%
325.5
-30%
461 ?(268 - 656, n=36)
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
454.2
479.5
6%
352.6
-22%
694
53%
385.4
-15%
332.2
-27%
499 ?(289 - 730, n=36)
10%
Write Seq Q32T1
3021
2818
-7%
1174
-61%
3017
0%
2784
-8%
2978
-1%
2903 ?(788 - 3033, n=36)
-4%
Read Seq Q32T1
3534
3548
0%
2261
-36%
3561
1%
3217
-9%
3552
1%
3479 ?(2853 - 3568, n=36)
-2%
AS SSD
74%
-14%
60%
-2%
-33%
34%
Seq Read
2797
2776
-1%
1821
-35%
2794
0%
2144
-23%
2081
-26%
2553 ?(1938 - 3148, n=37)
-9%
Seq Write
1528
1461
-4%
794
-48%
2385
56%
1389
-9%
1433
-6%
2084 ?(1248 - 2837, n=37)
36%
4K Read
54.3
63.8
17%
47.54
-12%
60.7
12%
49.77
-8%
49.92
-8%
53.1 ?(44.3 - 68.4, n=37)
-2%
4K Write
128.4
209.4
63%
141.6
10%
180.8
41%
105
-18%
119.1
-7%
131.2 ?(87.4 - 208, n=37)
2%
4K-64 Read
1095
1148
5%
782
-29%
1768
61%
855
-22%
585
-47%
1477 ?(762 - 2093, n=37)
35%
4K-64 Write
1640
1623
-1%
766
-53%
1800
10%
1660
1%
1630
-1%
1805 ?(1074 - 2152, n=37)
10%
Access Time Read *
0.041
0.032
22%
0.191
-366%
0.037
10%
0.058
-41%
0.043
-5%
0.04983 ?(0.032 - 0.087, n=36)
-22%
Access Time Write *
0.03
0.019
37%
0.027
10%
0.073
-143%
0.272
-807%
0.097
-223%
0.04222 ?(0.017 - 0.128, n=37)
-41%
Score Read
1429
1489
4%
1012
-29%
2108
48%
1119
-22%
843
-41%
1786 ?(1078 - 2449, n=37)
25%
Score Write
1922
1978
3%
987
-49%
2219
15%
1904
-1%
1892
-2%
2144 ?(1471 - 2527, n=37)
12%
Score Total
4029
4178
4%
2477
-39%
5392
34%
3570
-11%
3149
-22%
4826 ?(3309 - 6095, n=37)
20%
Copy ISO MB/s
2715
1833
-32%
1243
-54%
2065
-24%
1929
-29%
2452
-10%
2098 ?(901 - 2932, n=23)
-23%
Copy Program MB/s
130.1
993
663%
628
383%
734
464%
1012
678%
72.2
-45%
500 ?(118.7 - 803, n=23)
284%
Copy Game MB/s
459.3
1607
250%
976
112%
1629
255%
1737
278%
404
-12%
1132 ?(372 - 1830, n=23)
146%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
39% / 48%
-26% / -23%
38% / 44%
-11% / -8%
-21% / -24%
16% / 20%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3534 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3021 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 454.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 461.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2456 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2032 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 58 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 133.1 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics - Intel Xe Graphics G7 (96 EUs)

GPU-Z: Intel Xe Graphics G7
GPU-Z: Intel Xe Graphics G7

The processor's integrated Xe Graphics G7 is responsible for graphics processing. This is the faster version with 96 processing units, which also benefits from the RAM's dual-channel configuration. However, the iGPU is still a few percent faster in combination with LPDDR4X RAM. Nonetheless, the old UHD Graphics of the predecessor is significantly outperformed, and the new iGPU is 2-3x faster in the synthetic tests. In addition, performance also remains stable, since the demanding 3DMark Time Spy stress test is completed with 98%.

With the Xe iGPU, older or less demanding titles can often be played smoothly, at least with low details. But this plays a secondary role in a business laptop anyway.

As with the processor, the graphics performance is about 10-15% lower on battery power. Additional GPU benchmarks are available in our dedicated benchmarks section.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
6878 Points ∼100% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6711 Points ∼98% +8%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2942 - 7115, n=91)
6364 Points ∼93% +2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6294 Points ∼92% +1%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6218 Points ∼90%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5339 Points ∼78% -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (410 - 16128, n=98, last 2 years)
5167 Points ∼75% -17%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10810U
1923 Points ∼28% -69%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
29901 Points ∼100% +13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
29609 Points ∼99% +12%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
26910 Points ∼90% +2%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
26820 Points ∼90% +1%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (16709 - 38040, n=82)
26509 Points ∼89% 0%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
26433 Points ∼88%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2795 - 53539, n=79, last 2 years)
21816 Points ∼73% -17%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10810U
11127 Points ∼37% -58%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5498 Points ∼100% +18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5455 Points ∼99% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5202 Points ∼95% +11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5169 Points ∼94% +11%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2901 - 5909, n=101)
4837 Points ∼88% +3%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4676 Points ∼85%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (315 - 11055, n=103, last 2 years)
3677 Points ∼67% -21%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10810U
1380 Points ∼25% -70%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
1607 Points ∼100% +9%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
1603 Points ∼100% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1563 Points ∼97% +6%
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1470 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (783 - 1819, n=99)
1453 Points ∼90% -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1430 Points ∼89% -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (116 - 4721, n=95, last 2 years)
1197 Points ∼74% -19%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10810U
432 Points ∼27% -71%
3DMark 11 Performance
6302 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
80566 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
16722 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4168 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1617 points
Help
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 77.5 65.6 22 8.79 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 72 49 25.9 13 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 116 71.6 49.4 46.8 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 37.8 20.1 14.9 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 19.2 18.6 17.7 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 43 23 21 20 fps
Strange Brigade (2018) 83.3 34.3 27.9 22.5 fps
F1 2020 (2020) 87 41 33 21 fps

Emissions - The EliteBook remains quiet

Noise emissions

The single fan is very quiet overall, and even under load, only a quiet hiss is audible. The fan is usually completely turned off during low load and in idle usage, but every now and then, it kicks in for no apparent reason. We've already seen this behavior in other HP laptops from the last few months. Apart from that, we can't detect any electronic noises or coil whine.

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 26 / 27.5 dB(A)
Load
35.4 / 35.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
HP EliteBook 830 G7
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Noise
-2%
2%
4%
-1%
-2%
off / environment *
26
25.5
2%
24.2
7%
25.4
2%
27.7
-7%
26.8
-3%
Idle Minimum *
26
25.5
2%
24.2
7%
25.6
2%
27.8
-7%
27.1
-4%
Idle Average *
26
25.5
2%
24.2
7%
25.6
2%
27.8
-7%
27.1
-4%
Idle Maximum *
27.5
29
-5%
24.2
12%
25.6
7%
27.8
-1%
27.1
1%
Load Average *
35.4
37.4
-6%
39.5
-12%
28.7
19%
27.9
21%
31.4
11%
Load Maximum *
35.3
37.4
-6%
39.5
-12%
38.2
-8%
37
-5%
39
-10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
37.4
32
32.8

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.629.232.630.133.62534.939.136.131.934.93142.94242.136.942.94031.930.33028.731.9502926.930.929.9296327.928.228.134.427.98031.823.32019.531.810020.519.118.818.120.512523.319.420.117.923.316018.518.418.516.218.520017.21918.515.617.225016.618.318.614.816.631516.720.219.914.916.740014.818.819.113.914.850013.320.721.113.413.36301320.620.812.81380015.922.322.712.215.9100017.224.224.712.317.2125015.222.92312.415.2160015.924.824.912.415.9200016.425.625.812.516.4250015.825.825.612.915.831501625.325.313.316400014.823.723.613.314.8500014.224.12413.614.2630013.717.617.513.713.7800013.915.415.413.713.91000013.814.915.213.613.81250013.51414.413.413.516000131313.612.713SPL27.535.335.425.327.5N0.92.12.10.70.9median 15.8median 20.2median 20.1median 13.4median 15.8Delta1.22.931.11.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7

Temperature

The conservative processor configuration has a positive effect when it comes to surface temperatures, because even under full load, there are only a few spots that reach more than 40 °C (~104 °F). The case hardly warms up in everyday use.

Power consumption settles at around 19 watts in the stress test, and both the processor and the graphics card need to share this (CPU: 4x ~1.5-1.6 GHz; iGPU: ~680 MHz). There are no performance losses directly after the stress test.

CPU and iGPU measurements in the stress test
CPU and iGPU measurements in the stress test
Max. Load
 34.2 °C
94 F
41.7 °C
107 F
35.7 °C
96 F
 
 32.3 °C
90 F
37.9 °C
100 F
35.3 °C
96 F
 
 29 °C
84 F
30 °C
86 F
30.7 °C
87 F
 
Maximum: 41.7 °C = 107 F
Average: 34.1 °C = 93 F
36.7 °C
98 F
39.1 °C
102 F
32.9 °C
91 F
35.6 °C
96 F
37.2 °C
99 F
33.6 °C
92 F
32.4 °C
90 F
33.1 °C
92 F
31.1 °C
88 F
Maximum: 39.1 °C = 102 F
Average: 34.6 °C = 94 F
Power Supply (max.)  47.6 °C = 118 F | Room Temperature 23.6 °C = 74 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.4 to 58.4 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.4 °C / -4.4 F).
Heat map - Idle (top)
Heat map - Idle (top)
Heat map - Idle (bottom)
Heat map - Idle (bottom)
Heat map - Stress test (top)
Heat map - Stress test (top)
Heat map - Stress test (bottom)
Heat map - Stress test (bottom)

Speakers

Although the two stereo speakers next to the keyboard don't get extremely loud, they convince with a clean reproduction of mids and highs, which is particularly positive when reproducing voices. Even playing videos and listening to some music is no problem with these modules, and headphones or external speakers aren't absolutely necessary.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.430.130.42532.731.932.73141.536.941.54029.728.729.75030.329.930.36323.434.423.48028.619.528.610038.718.138.712545.217.945.216049.716.249.720049.715.649.725054.414.854.431561.814.961.840067.113.967.150066.813.466.863067.212.867.280066.212.266.2100068.812.368.812506712.467160068.312.468.3200069.912.569.9250070.812.970.831507213.372400069.513.369.5500066.213.666.2630062.513.762.5800066.413.766.41000064.913.664.91250064.313.464.3160006312.763SPL80.525.380.5N49.30.749.3median 66.2median 13.4median 66.2Delta4.21.14.238.139.828.737.333.343.333.24229.734.82534.922.332.824.133.42131.921.935.719.648.220.649.615.753.215.1621466.916.269.213.366.515.263.813.468.512.869.112.165.511.563.611.663.211.963.512.363.512.464.512.659.412.558.612.355.611.749.625.577.40.740.8median 13.3median 63.22.77.545.142.445.137.735.437.735.230.635.232.330.632.340.329.840.334.329.934.330.629.630.63527.93549.631.949.65730.6576026.76067.120.267.167.422.867.466.819.966.870.416.670.474.215.274.273.114.873.177.114.177.175.413.975.474.313.774.371.713.671.773.713.873.770.713.370.76913.2697213.27269.113.269.168.513.468.569.713.169.766.813.166.86412.56484.627.884.664.7164.7median 69.1median 13.9median 69.14.73.74.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GEDell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Energy management - HP Subnotebook with good endurance

Energy consumption

The bright panel takes its toll when it comes to power consumption, because at full brightness, idle consumption is twice as high as that of the old EliteBook 830 G7 with the low-power 1080p display (400 cd/m²). Under full load, consumption quickly settles at just over 30 watts, meaning that the included 65-watt power adapter is perfectly adequate.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 2.9 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.5 / 8.4 / 10.3 Watt
Load midlight 34.6 / 33 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP EliteBook 830 G8-i7-1165G7
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.30
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
HP EliteBook 830 G7
i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
-1%
-1%
-21%
-8%
6%
-12%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
6.5
2.8
57%
2.6
60%
6.7
-3%
4.3
34%
3.6
45%
4.46 ?(2.2 - 9.8, n=86)
31%
4.21 ?(1.67 - 9.9, n=105, last 2 years)
35%
Idle Average *
8.4
5.9
30%
6
29%
10
-19%
8.3
1%
4.7
44%
7.92 ?(4.8 - 16.4, n=86)
6%
7.39 ?(4.6 - 14.1, n=105, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Maximum *
10.3
6.8
34%
8.2
20%
10.3
-0%
8.8
15%
5.1
50%
9.64 ?(5.8 - 16.9, n=86)
6%
9.23 ?(5.1 - 15.9, n=105, last 2 years)
10%
Load Average *
34.6
41.5
-20%
41.4
-20%
35.7
-3%
46.2
-34%
33.3
4%
39.7 ?(12.5 - 64, n=86)
-15%
39.2 ?(8.3 - 85.7, n=106, last 2 years)
-13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34.4
34.2
1%
32.7
5%
42.2
-23%
Load Maximum *
33
68.2
-107%
64.1
-94%
67.6
-105%
47.3
-43%
70
-112%
61.5 ?(30.1 - 99.3, n=86)
-86%
56.4 ?(19.6 - 110.9, n=105, last 2 years)
-71%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / Stress test

051015202530354045