Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Chuwi CoreBook X Pro laptop review: 120 Hz display for cheap

Looks good, but cheap parts. The CoreBook X Pro is the least expensive 15.6-inch laptop you can find with a 120 Hz panel. The catch, however, is you'll have to deal with substantial cut corners to major aspects of the system.
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

After having just reviewed the 14-inch CoreBook X a few months ago, Chuwi is now ready to launch the CoreBook X Pro which uses the same Intel 8th gen Core i5-8259U processor but in a larger 15.6-inch form factor. This larger version is a completely different beast in terms of features, display, and visual design when compared to the 14-inch model.

Competitors to the CoreBook X Pro include other budget 15.6-inch multimedia laptops like the HP Pavilion 15, Lenovo IdeaPad 3 series, Dell Inspiron series, or the Acer Aspire 3 series. Chuwi is now selling the model via its official online store for $559 USD.

More Chuwi reviews:

Chuwi CoreBook X Pro (CoreBook Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-8259U 4 x 2.3 - 3.8 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Coffee Lake-U
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Core: 1050 MHz, Memory: 1200 MHz, DDR4, 30.0.100.9864
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR4 1200 MHz, Single-Channel, Soldered
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, CMN1521, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Storage
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, 512 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.9 x 359.4 x 241.5 ( = 0.7 x 14.15 x 9.51 in)
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.811 kg ( = 63.88 oz / 3.99 pounds), Power Supply: 256 g ( = 9.03 oz / 0.56 pounds)
Price
559 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
74.8 %
09/2021
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655
1.8 kg17.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
77 %
09/2021
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
1.9 kg20.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.1 %
07/2021
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
R7 5700U, Vega 8 R4000
1.8 kg16.1 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.3 %
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
R7 4700U, Vega 7
1.7 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.8 %
07/2020
Honor MagicBook 15
R5 3500U, Vega 8
1.5 kg16.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.8 %
05/2020
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630
1.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1200

Case — Looks Good, Feels Bad

Chuwi laptops have always looked attractive especially for the price and the CoreBook X Pro continues the trend. The manufacturer has even introduced a new chassis design that's more visually unique when compared to the Apple lookalikes of older Chuwi models. Unfortunately, chassis rigidity hasn't really improved as the system creaks and bends more than we would like when twisting its corners. It certainly doesn't feel as strong as it looks.

Overall size is slightly larger and heavier than most other 15.6-inch laptops due to the thick bottom bezel of the CoreBook X Pro. The system weighs about the same as the XPS 15 9500 even though the Chuwi is larger in volume.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Red trims along the front and side edges add visual flare to an otherwise gray chassis
Red trims along the front and side edges add visual flare to an otherwise gray chassis
Outer lid and keyboard deck are smooth aluminum alloy
Outer lid and keyboard deck are smooth aluminum alloy
Lid opened to maximum (~140 degrees)
Lid opened to maximum (~140 degrees)
The bottom panel and sides are plastic
The bottom panel and sides are plastic
The hinges become noticeably weaker when opened to wider angles
The hinges become noticeably weaker when opened to wider angles
More ventilation grilles on this laptop than on most other Ultrabooks with 15 W to 28 W CPUs
More ventilation grilles on this laptop than on most other Ultrabooks with 15 W to 28 W CPUs
374 mm / 14.7 inch 243 mm / 9.57 inch 20.5 mm / 0.807 inch 1.9 kg4.29 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 239 mm / 9.41 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 1.7 kg3.72 lbs359.4 mm / 14.1 inch 241.5 mm / 9.51 inch 17.9 mm / 0.705 inch 1.8 kg3.99 lbs359.8 mm / 14.2 inch 233.8 mm / 9.2 inch 16.1 mm / 0.634 inch 1.8 kg3.97 lbs357.8 mm / 14.1 inch 229.9 mm / 9.05 inch 16.9 mm / 0.665 inch 1.5 kg3.37 lbs344.72 mm / 13.6 inch 230.14 mm / 9.06 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 1.8 kg4.03 lbs

Connectivity — No Power Delivery or DisplayPort

Port options are decent for a 15.6-inch multimedia laptop with plenty of USB ports and even gigabit Ethernet. Unfortunately, the USB-C port does not support DisplayPort or Power Delivery meaning users must use HDMI for any external monitors and the proprietary barrel charger for charging.

Front: No ports
Front: No ports
Right: USB-A 2.0, SD card reader, Gigabit RJ-45, Kensington lock
Right: USB-A 2.0, SD card reader, Gigabit RJ-45, Kensington lock
Rear: No ports
Rear: No ports
Left: AC adapter, full-size HDMI, 2x USB-A 3.0, USB-C (no DP or PD), 3.5 mm audio jack, webcam kill switch
Left: AC adapter, full-size HDMI, 2x USB-A 3.0, USB-C (no DP or PD), 3.5 mm audio jack, webcam kill switch

SD Card Reader

Transferring 1 GB of photos from our UHS-II SD card to desktop is slow at about 55 seconds compared to just 6 or 7 seconds on a Dell XPS 15.

Fully inserted SD card protrudes by over half its length
Fully inserted SD card protrudes by over half its length
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204.4 MB/s ∼100% +976%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
  (AV Pro V60)
78.3 MB/s ∼38% +312%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
35 MB/s ∼17% +84%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
  (AV Pro v60)
20.7 MB/s ∼10% +9%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
  (AV Pro V60)
19 MB/s ∼9%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
199.2 MB/s ∼100% +666%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
  (AV Pro V60)
84.5 MB/s ∼42% +225%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
36.9 MB/s ∼19% +42%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
  (AV Pro v60)
28.2 MB/s ∼14% +8%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
  (AV Pro V60)
26 MB/s ∼13%

Communication

Wireless performance is below average for the integrated 1x1 Intel 3165 module. Though good enough for browsing and streaming, transfer rates could have been more stable as shown below when paired to our Netgear RAX200 test router.

Non-removable WLAN module
Non-removable WLAN module
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1221 (968min - 1401max) MBit/s ∼100% +341%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1138 (844min - 1286max) MBit/s ∼93% +311%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1049 (253min - 1334max) MBit/s ∼86% +279%
Honor MagicBook 15
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
616 (559min - 687max) MBit/s ∼50% +122%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
277 (230min - 326max) MBit/s ∼23%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
262 (240min - 277max) MBit/s ∼21% -5%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1281 (1079min - 1478max) MBit/s ∼100% +835%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1276 (1239min - 1312max) MBit/s ∼100% +831%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1083 (972min - 1227max) MBit/s ∼85% +691%
Honor MagicBook 15
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
613 (577min - 630max) MBit/s ∼48% +347%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
238 (207min - 270max) MBit/s ∼19% +74%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
137 (60min - 194max) MBit/s ∼11%
050100150200250300689714616418912416792186140182182194108937860651337080143192104172191175156146132689714616418912416792186140182182194108937860651337080143192104172191175156146132275276263273265295285279283273262280276283281230326259275287283282282280278282268267286265Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø134 (60-194)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø277 (230-326)

Webcam

Camera quality is poor even by the already low standards of laptop webcams. Color temperature is far too warm, colors are very off, and the overall picture is muddy despite our bright ambient lighting.

ColorChecker
21 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
29 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
0.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Chuwi CoreBook X Pro: 21.76 ∆E min: 0.59 - max: 30.83 ∆E

Maintenance

The bottom panel can be easily removed with just a Philips screwdriver and sharp edge. Users have direct access to 2x M.2 bays and a SODIMM slot for expansion.

Accessories and Warranty

There are no extras in the box other than the paperwork and AC adapter. A one year limited manufacturer warranty applies, but claiming warranty may be difficult for buyers overseas due to shipment.

Input Devices — Wonky Keys and Clickpad

Keyboard

Though Ultrabook keyboards are usually quite shallow, the keys on the CoreBook X Pro are both shallow and soft for an unsatisfying typing experience. The Enter and Space keys in particular are too spongy while the Windows key on our test unit would sometimes not even register a press.

Touchpad

The clickpad is larger than the clickpad on the Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 (12.5 x 7.8 cm vs. 11.5 x 7.6 cm). Regular cursor control is reliable and especially smooth due to the 120 Hz refresh rate of the display. Multi-touch drag and drop actions aren't as reliable, however, as the cursor may sometimes jump. The clickpad surface is also a bit too sticky when gliding at slower speeds which impacts precision clicks.

All keys and symbols are illuminated when the backlight is active
All keys and symbols are illuminated when the backlight is active
Integrated clickpad keys are shallow and with a satisfyingly loud clatter
Integrated clickpad keys are shallow and with a satisfyingly loud clatter
Key feedback is weak and with shallow travel
Key feedback is weak and with shallow travel
Numpad and arrow keys are narrower and more cramped than the main QWERTY keys
Numpad and arrow keys are narrower and more cramped than the main QWERTY keys

Display — 120 Hz Doesn't Come Free

The CoreBook X Pro uses the same Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1 IPS panel as found on the Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM or Acer Nitro 5 AN515-55 gaming laptops. This particular panel offers a native refresh rate of 120 Hz alongside decently fast response times for smoother gameplay. Colors and brightness are limited, however, as this is technically a budget laptop. Higher-end panels like those found on the Razer Blade 15 are able to offer faster response times, faster refresh rates, and deeper colors for both gaming and digital editing.

Thicker bottom bezel with no edge-to-edge glass protection
Thicker bottom bezel with no edge-to-edge glass protection
Narrow side bezels
Narrow side bezels
Matte overlay is just slightly grainier than a glossy alternative
Matte overlay is just slightly grainier than a glossy alternative
Slight uneven backlight bleeding along the right edge
Slight uneven backlight bleeding along the right edge
253.8
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
250.4
cd/m²
250.8
cd/m²
269.7
cd/m²
251.5
cd/m²
235.2
cd/m²
268.2
cd/m²
240.2
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 269.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 253.1 cd/m² Minimum: 27.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 269.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1349:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.61
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
43.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
N156HCA-EN1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Chi Mei N156HCA-EAB, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
N156HCA-EA1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Honor MagicBook 15
AU Optronics B156HAN02.8, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Sharp LQ156N1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1200
Display
56%
4%
52%
-5%
79%
Display P3 Coverage
41.9
65.6
57%
43.6
4%
65.93
57%
39.96
-5%
81.53
95%
sRGB Coverage
62.9
98.1
56%
65.2
4%
91.95
46%
59.68
-5%
100
59%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
43.4
67.8
56%
45
4%
66.71
54%
41.29
-5%
79.64
84%
Response Times
-22%
30%
-32%
-12%
-30%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
31.2 ?(17.2, 14)
39.6 ?(20.4, 19.2)
-27%
18 ?(8, 10)
42%
42 ?(23.2, 18.8)
-35%
36 ?(18, 18)
-15%
42 ?(20, 22)
-35%
Response Time Black / White *
23.2 ?(12.4, 10.8)
26.8 ?(16, 10.8)
-16%
19 ?(10, 9)
18%
29.6 ?(16, 13.6)
-28%
25 ?(14, 11)
-8%
28.8 ?(15.2, 13.6)
-24%
PWM Frequency
25510 ?(30)
Screen
20%
-22%
-7%
-9%
17%
Brightness middle
269.7
293
9%
289
7%
351
30%
251
-7%
592
120%
Brightness
253
266
5%
267
6%
337
33%
247
-2%
565
123%
Brightness Distribution
87
84
-3%
85
-2%
91
5%
85
-2%
85
-2%
Black Level *
0.2
0.21
-5%
0.56
-180%
0.29
-45%
0.205
-3%
0.46
-130%
Contrast
1349
1395
3%
516
-62%
1210
-10%
1224
-9%
1287
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.9
2.1
46%
3.96
-2%
4.5
-15%
3.94
-1%
3.19
18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
15.77
5
68%
6.76
57%
9.4
40%
7.87
50%
5.45
65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.61
0.7
57%
1.9
-18%
3.42
-112%
2.03
-26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
3.5
-0%
3.43
2%
6.3
-80%
3.42
2%
3.9
-11%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.21 100%
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.44 90%
2.25 98%
CCT
7045 92%
6681 97%
7191 90%
6601 98%
6319 103%
6522 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
42
59.7
38
71.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
65
91.8
59
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
18% / 22%
4% / -8%
4% / 2%
-9% / -9%
22% / 24%

* ... smaller is better

Color space is narrow at just 63 percent of sRGB to be indicative of panel unfit for digital editors. This is one of the few displays with both a high 120 Hz refresh rate and a limited gamut as high refresh rates would usually come with high (>90 percent) sRGB coverage.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3

X-Rite colorimeter measurements show color temperature to be slightly too cool at 7045K versus the sRGB target of 6500K. Once we calibrated the display, grayscale and colors would improve noticeably. Colors still become more inaccurate at high saturation levels due to the limited color space of the panel.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21103 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is average at best only when under shade as anything brighter will wash out colors and text. This isn't to say that the display is dim as it is sufficiently bright for indoor conditions, but pricier alternatives like the XPS 15 can be two times brighter for significantly better visibility outdoors.

Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Wide IPS viewing angles. Contrast and colors degrade from extreme wide angles
Wide IPS viewing angles. Contrast and colors degrade from extreme wide angles

Performance — 28 W TDP Core i5-8259U Returns

Processor

The 28 W Core i5-8259U holds up well to newer models despite being a few years old. Multi-thread performance edges out both the newer 10th gen Core i5-1035G1 and i7-1065G7 while being behind in single-thread performance by 10 to 15 percent.

Performance sustainability is excellent with no significant dips over time when at 100 percent CPU utilization for extended periods.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630636.38631.9629.36627.27629.12632.21628.43630.6629.49629.39627.87628.79630.73631.16629.07630.29626.6630.12631628.17627.84628.18631.08628.71628.45630.03628.1629.54627.02626.57629.77628.86629.36631.51628.89631.56627.6630.92629.54627.8629.23629.12629.42627.98627.84627.74624.68630.22627.6629.53639.84546.09517.42517.16522.75522.09520.62521.37521.36522.38521.32522.72516.98494.21520.41519.86521.87518.5520.55521.53520.72523.37522.2521.15522.15488.76486.16486.9482.86484.24484.32485.05486.35487.27485.05486.35486.35486.99485.43483.5485.15487.55482.58486.64487.92487.08485.79484.6485.8484.87486.36485.14487.45485.61486.25487.27487.82488.03485.43486.81487.64487.73486.71486.99486.36486.16483.78486.81486.44485.79485.7486.35485.79488.11486.16574.25572.07571.18573.62572.33573.1568.65575.29573.23571.56572.84570.17573.1572.33571.69567.76571.83572.84570.55573.35569.14571.31572.46569.78570.04572.58569.36574.13572.71572.84573.23572.97572.89575.29575.28574.77572.58574.25573.61572.58570.84568.38565.38569.66567.13567.01572.46559.33568.3567.01636.38631.9629.36627.27629.12632.21628.43630.6629.49629.39627.87628.79630.73631.16629.07630.29626.6630.12631628.17627.84628.18631.08628.71628.45630.03628.1629.54627.02626.57629.77628.86629.36631.51628.89631.56627.6630.92629.54627.8629.23629.12629.42627.98627.84627.74624.68630.22627.6629.53639.84546.09517.42517.16522.75522.09520.62521.37521.36522.38521.32522.72516.98494.21520.41519.86521.87518.5520.55521.53520.72523.37522.2521.15522.15488.76486.16486.9482.86484.24484.32485.05486.35487.27485.05486.35486.35486.99485.43483.5485.15487.55482.58486.64487.92487.08485.79484.6485.8484.87486.36485.14487.45485.61486.25487.27487.82488.03485.43486.81487.64487.73486.71486.99486.36486.16483.78486.81486.44485.79485.7486.35485.79488.11486.16574.25572.07571.18573.62572.33573.1568.65575.29573.23571.56572.84570.17573.1572.33571.69567.76571.83572.84570.55573.35569.14571.31572.46569.78570.04572.58569.36574.13572.71572.84573.23572.97572.89575.29575.28574.77572.58574.25573.61572.58570.84568.38565.38569.66567.13567.01572.46559.33568.3567.01636.38631.9629.36627.27629.12632.21628.43630.6629.49629.39627.87628.79630.73631.16629.07630.29626.6630.12631628.17627.84628.18631.08628.71628.45630.03628.1629.54627.02626.57629.77628.86629.36631.51628.89631.56627.6630.92629.54627.8629.23629.12629.42627.98627.84627.74624.68630.22627.6629.53639.84546.09517.42517.16522.75522.09520.62521.37521.36522.38521.32522.72516.98494.21520.41519.86521.87518.5520.55521.53520.72523.37522.2521.15522.15488.76486.16486.9482.86484.24484.32485.05486.35487.27485.05486.35486.35486.99485.43483.5485.15487.55482.58486.64487.92487.08485.79484.6485.8484.87486.36485.14487.45485.61486.25487.27487.82488.03485.43486.81487.64487.73486.71486.99486.36486.16483.78486.81486.44485.79485.7486.35485.79488.11486.16574.25572.07571.18573.62572.33573.1568.65575.29573.23571.56572.84570.17573.1572.33571.69567.76571.83572.84570.55573.35569.14571.31572.46569.78570.04572.58569.36574.13572.71572.84573.23572.97572.89575.29575.28574.77572.58574.25573.61572.58570.84568.38565.38569.66567.13567.01572.46559.33568.3567.01Tooltip
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø629 (624.68-636.38)
HP 15s-fq1440ng Intel Core i7-1065G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø526 (494.21-639.84)
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl Intel Core i7-8565U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø486 (482.58-488.76)
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø571 (559.33-575.29)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
2870 Points ∼100% +90%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
2347 Points ∼82% +55%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1908 Points ∼66% +26%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1855 Points ∼65% +23%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
1512 Points ∼53%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (1385 - 1512, n=3)
1443 Points ∼50% -5%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1360 Points ∼47% -10%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1311 Points ∼46% -13%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
1283 Points ∼45% -15%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U
1110 Points ∼39% -27%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
575 Points ∼100% +51%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
518 Points ∼90% +36%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
478 Points ∼83% +25%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
446 Points ∼78% +17%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
439 Points ∼76% +15%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
428 Points ∼74% +12%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U
405 Points ∼70% +6%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (381 - 386, n=3)
383 Points ∼67% +1%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
381 Points ∼66%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
355 Points ∼62% -7%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
7378 Points ∼100% +88%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4947 (4868.64min - 4947.48max) Points ∼67% +26%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4204 Points ∼57% +7%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
3917 (3844.79min - 3916.64max) Points ∼53%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (3592 - 3917, n=3)
3746 Points ∼51% -4%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1495 Points ∼100% +53%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1362 Points ∼91% +39%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1224 Points ∼82% +25%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (973 - 991, n=3)
981 Points ∼66% 0%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
980 Points ∼66%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1173 (1033.3min - 1172.68max) Points ∼100% +84%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
934 (873.29min - 934.25max) Points ∼80% +47%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
762 (618.81min - 762.14max) Points ∼65% +20%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
735 Points ∼63% +16%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
639.84 (494.21min - 639.84max) Points ∼55% +1%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
636 (624.68min - 636.38max) Points ∼54%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (575 - 687, n=5)
624 Points ∼53% -2%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
561 Points ∼48% -12%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
549 Points ∼47% -14%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U
492 Points ∼42% -23%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
221 Points ∼100% +44%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
197 Points ∼89% +29%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
185 Points ∼84% +21%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
177.86 Points ∼80% +16%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U
172 Points ∼78% +12%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
172 Points ∼78% +12%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
166 Points ∼75% +8%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
153 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (132 - 154, n=4)
148 Points ∼67% -3%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
140.67 Points ∼64% -8%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
896 Seconds * ∼100% -28%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
863.4 Seconds * ∼96% -24%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
816.8 Seconds * ∼91% -17%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (699 - 769, n=4)
747 Seconds * ∼83% -7%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
699 Seconds * ∼78%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
696 Seconds * ∼78% -0%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
603 Seconds * ∼67% +14%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
566 Seconds * ∼63% +19%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
476 Seconds * ∼53% +32%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5416 MIPS ∼100% +35%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4838 MIPS ∼89% +20%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
4516 MIPS ∼83% +12%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4451 MIPS ∼82% +11%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
4302 MIPS ∼79% +7%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
4261 MIPS ∼79% +6%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
4018 MIPS ∼74%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (3951 - 4022, n=4)
3993 MIPS ∼74% -1%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
3687 MIPS ∼68% -8%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
31858 MIPS ∼100% +64%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
25815 MIPS ∼81% +33%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
22655 MIPS ∼71% +17%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
21927 MIPS ∼69% +13%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
19407 MIPS ∼61%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (17799 - 21107, n=4)
19279 MIPS ∼61% -1%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
16887 MIPS ∼53% -13%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
15495 MIPS ∼49% -20%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
15114 MIPS ∼47% -22%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1417 Points ∼100%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1308 Points ∼92%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
1220 Points ∼86%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1172 Points ∼83%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1168 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
 
984 Points ∼69%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
925 Points ∼65%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
6502 Points ∼100%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
6234 Points ∼96%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5059 Points ∼78%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
4144 Points ∼64%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
3480 Points ∼54%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
 
3359 Points ∼52%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
3337 Points ∼51%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
8.18 fps ∼100% +51%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
7.33 fps ∼90% +35%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.59 fps ∼81% +22%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5.82 fps ∼71% +7%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
5.42 fps ∼66%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (4.72 - 5.42, n=4)
5.08 fps ∼62% -6%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
4.47 fps ∼55% -18%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
4.29 fps ∼52% -21%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
4.25 fps ∼52% -22%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
73.31 s * ∼100% -1%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
72.7 s * ∼99%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (63.6 - 76, n=3)
70.8 s * ∼97% +3%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
65.2 s * ∼89% +10%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
59.04 s * ∼81% +19%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
55.5 s * ∼76% +24%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
51 s * ∼70% +30%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
47.5 s * ∼65% +35%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.9 s * ∼63% +37%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
0.843 sec * ∼100% -14%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (0.738 - 0.786, n=3)
0.757 sec * ∼90% -3%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
0.749 sec * ∼89% -1%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
0.738 sec * ∼88%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
0.679 sec * ∼81% +8%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.625 sec * ∼74% +15%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
0.623 sec * ∼74% +16%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
0.598 sec * ∼71% +19%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.56 sec * ∼66% +24%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
636 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
40.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
153 Points
Help

System Performance

PCMark 10 results are dragged down by the slow Iris Plus Graphics 655 in our unit. In particular, our Digital Content Creation score is about 17 percent below where it should be when compared to the average laptop in our database equipped with the exact same GPU.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5402 Points ∼100% +51%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Kingston SA2000M81000G
5307 Points ∼98% +48%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
4329 Points ∼80% +21%
Honor MagicBook 15
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3883 Points ∼72% +8%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (3284 - 4132, n=4)
3765 Points ∼70% +5%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
3580 Points ∼66%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
3449 Points ∼64% -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
9874 Points ∼100% +28%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Kingston SA2000M81000G
9294 Points ∼94% +20%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
9270 Points ∼94% +20%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
7997 Points ∼81% +4%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (7364 - 8351, n=4)
7838 Points ∼79% +2%
Honor MagicBook 15
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
7775 Points ∼79% +1%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7715 Points ∼78%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
8111 Points ∼100% +35%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Kingston SA2000M81000G
7945 Points ∼98% +32%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
6996 Points ∼86% +16%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
6029 Points ∼74%
Honor MagicBook 15
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5799 Points ∼71% -4%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (4390 - 6400, n=4)
5792 Points ∼71% -4%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
5286 Points ∼65% -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5691 Points ∼100% +112%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Kingston SA2000M81000G
5495 Points ∼97% +105%
Honor MagicBook 15
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3526 Points ∼62% +32%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (2679 - 3613, n=4)
3214 Points ∼56% +20%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
3187 Points ∼56% +19%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
2679 Points ∼47%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
2635 Points ∼46% -2%
PCMark 10 Score
3580 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows latency issues when opening multiple tabs on our homepage. 4K UHD video playback at 60 FPS is otherwise smooth and with no dropped frames despite the slower-than-expected graphics performance from our Iris Plus Graphics 655.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1521.2 μs * ∼100% -54%
Honor MagicBook 15
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
1343.1 μs * ∼88% -36%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
1268.4 μs * ∼83% -28%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
990.3 μs * ∼65%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
586.8 μs * ∼39% +41%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Kingston SA2000M81000G
335.4 μs * ∼22% +66%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices — Up to 2x M.2 2280 SSDs

Our test unit ships with a budget 512 GB Kingston NVMe SSD for sequential read and write rates of up to ~1600 MB/s and ~1000 MB/s, respectively, according to our own tests and benchmarks. Faster NVMe drives exist, but the system can only support up to PCI x2 and not x4 speeds which is acceptable given the price, ULV processor, and graphics. If installing a second drive, keep in mind that it must be an M.2 SATA III drive.

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS SSD
AS SSD
System can support up to one M.2 PCIe 3 x2 2280 NVMe SSD and one M.2 SATA III 2280 SSD simultaneously
System can support up to one M.2 PCIe 3 x2 2280 NVMe SSD and one M.2 SATA III 2280 SSD simultaneously
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Teclast BD256GB
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
Honor MagicBook 15
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
AS SSD
-54%
54%
33%
-35%
Seq Read
1404.08
523
-63%
2082.32
48%
2829.79
102%
1423.43
1%
Seq Write
962.22
443
-54%
1843.62
92%
2187.14
127%
766.19
-20%
4K Read
36.5
23.12
-37%
44.33
21%
45.36
24%
42.21
16%
4K Write
97.49
96.97
-1%
157.46
62%
88.57
-9%
74.83
-23%
4K-64 Read
776.02
202.43
-74%
1039.02
34%
731.88
-6%
972.67
25%
4K-64 Write
684.97
264.1
-61%
1555.75
127%
1198.51
75%
218.8
-68%
Access Time Read *
0.066
0.122
-85%
0.05
24%
0.055
17%
0.125
-89%
Access Time Write *
0.136
0.171
-26%
0.065
52%
0.037
73%
0.552
-306%
Score Read
953
278
-71%
1292
36%
1060
11%
1157
21%
Score Write
879
405
-54%
1898
116%
1506
71%
370
-58%
Score Total
2304
830
-64%
3845
67%
3087
34%
2094
-9%
Copy ISO MB/s
961.47
1440.7
50%
1150.94
20%
1150.59
20%
Copy Program MB/s
442.21
484.92
10%
239.28
-46%
499.35
13%
Copy Game MB/s
898.16
1098.19
22%
634.76
-29%
732.94
-18%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-9%
85%
99%
42%
Write 4K
52.06
109.36
110%
116.8
124%
136.1
161%
93.29
79%
Read 4K
27.74
38.89
40%
43.92
58%
42.88
55%
45.9
65%
Write Seq
798.6
405.24
-49%
1990
149%
2335
192%
1211
52%
Read Seq
813.5
528.53
-35%
1959
141%
2183
168%
1633
101%
Write 4K Q32T1
306.6
284.18
-7%
373.3
22%
261.2
-15%
273.1
-11%
Read 4K Q32T1
373.2
337.77
-9%
523.9
40%
328.1
-12%
356
-5%
Write Seq Q32T1
1042
436.5
-58%
1985
90%
2348
125%
1198
15%
Read Seq Q32T1
1612
559.8
-65%
2456
52%
3564
121%
2269
41%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-32% / -35%
70% / 65%
66% / 57%
4% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1612 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1042 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 373.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 306.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 813.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 798.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 27.74 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 52.06 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0Tooltip

GPU Performance — Underperformer

Graphics performance is unusually low at almost 50 percent slower than the average Iris Plus Graphics 655 in our database. Our results would not change even after updating the drivers.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
8204 Points ∼100% +501%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
5751 Points ∼70% +321%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), R7 5700U
5667 Points ∼69% +315%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
5418 Points ∼66% +297%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U
4173 Points ∼51% +206%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U
3965 Points ∼48% +190%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
3487 Points ∼43% +155%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
2632 Points ∼32% +93%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (1365 - 3081, n=5)
2614 Points ∼32% +92%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, i5-1035G1
2115 Points ∼26% +55%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
2065 Points ∼25% +51%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1813 Points ∼22% +33%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1759 Points ∼21% +29%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
1744 Points ∼21% +28%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
1365 Points ∼17%
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
6009 Points ∼100% +383%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
4475 Points ∼74% +259%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
4439 Points ∼74% +257%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), R7 5700U
3553 Points ∼59% +185%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U
3405 Points ∼57% +173%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
2903 Points ∼48% +133%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U
2799 Points ∼47% +125%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
2306 Points ∼38% +85%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (1245 - 2683, n=5)
2232 Points ∼37% +79%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, i5-1035G1
2223 Points ∼37% +79%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
2154 Points ∼36% +73%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
1783 Points ∼30% +43%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1641 Points ∼27% +32%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1548 Points ∼26% +24%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
1245 Points ∼21%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
4753 Points ∼100% +417%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
4126 Points ∼87% +348%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
3596 Points ∼76% +291%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), R7 5700U
3430 Points ∼72% +273%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U
2612 Points ∼55% +184%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
1809 Points ∼38% +97%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (920 - 2260, n=6)
1806 Points ∼38% +96%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
1667 Points ∼35% +81%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, i5-1035G1
1666 Points ∼35% +81%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
1530 Points ∼32% +66%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1210 Points ∼25% +32%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
1189 Points ∼25% +29%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1092 Points ∼23% +19%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
920 Points ∼19%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
1945 Points ∼100% +546%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
1276 Points ∼66% +324%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
1089 Points ∼56% +262%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), R7 5700U
1040 Points ∼53% +246%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U
673 Points ∼35% +124%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
563 Points ∼29% +87%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (301 - 633, n=7)
556 Points ∼29% +85%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
517 Points ∼27% +72%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, i5-1035G1
437 Points ∼22% +45%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
419 Points ∼22% +39%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
382 Points ∼20% +27%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
373 Points ∼19% +24%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
301 Points ∼15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
2103 Points ∼100% +504%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
1419 Points ∼67% +308%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
1236 Points ∼59% +255%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), R7 5700U
1187 Points ∼56% +241%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U
760 Points ∼36% +118%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
640 Points ∼30% +84%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (348 - 722, n=7)
632 Points ∼30% +82%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
588 Points ∼28% +69%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, i5-1035G1
500 Points ∼24% +44%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
476 Points ∼23% +37%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
441 Points ∼21% +27%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
427 Points ∼20% +23%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
348 Points ∼17%
3DMark 11 Performance
1548 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6769 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
852 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
348 points
Help
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
51.5 fps ∼100% +465%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
33.5 fps ∼65% +268%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
31 fps ∼60% +240%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
25.377 fps ∼49% +179%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
15.6 fps ∼30% +71%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
15.4 fps ∼30% +69%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (9.11 - 17.3, n=5)
14.7 fps ∼29% +61%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
9.11 fps ∼18%
Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
139 (120.9min) fps ∼100% +170%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
99.2 (87.8min) fps ∼71% +93%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
97 (84.9min) fps ∼70% +89%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
95.1 (83.3min) fps ∼68% +85%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
92.6 (74.2min) fps ∼67% +80%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
90.4 (81.3min) fps ∼65% +76%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (51.4 - 98, n=6)
84.8 fps ∼61% +65%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
81.6 (52.7min) fps ∼59% +59%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
79 (70.3min) fps ∼57% +54%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
76.7 (66.8min) fps ∼55% +49%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
71.5 (61.8min) fps ∼51% +39%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
70.6 (60.1min) fps ∼51% +37%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
70.3 (61.6min) fps ∼51% +37%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
51.4 (43.6min) fps ∼37%
1366x768 med (1/3)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
117 (101.1min) fps ∼100% +215%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
82.7 (73.3min) fps ∼71% +123%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
82.1 (70.5min) fps ∼70% +121%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
75.8 (64.7min) fps ∼65% +104%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
69.5 (64.3min) fps ∼59% +87%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
64.2 (50.3min) fps ∼55% +73%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (37.1 - 68, n=6)
59.2 fps ∼51% +60%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
57 (48.7min) fps ∼49% +54%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
54.2 (37.5min) fps ∼46% +46%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
50 (45.3min) fps ∼43% +35%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
45.6 (35.3min) fps ∼39% +23%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
44.1 (38.7min) fps ∼38% +19%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
37.1 (32.3min) fps ∼32%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
31.9 (24.8min) fps ∼27% -14%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
95.6 (83.2min) fps ∼100% +505%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
54.9 (49min) fps ∼57% +247%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
48.8 (44min) fps ∼51% +209%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
42 (38.5min) fps ∼44% +166%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
40 (27.4min) fps ∼42% +153%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
39.3 (35.3min) fps ∼41% +149%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
36.2 (32.6min) fps ∼38% +129%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
29.4 (23.7min) fps ∼31% +86%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (15.8 - 34.7, n=6)
29.3 fps ∼31% +85%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
27.8 (24.9min) fps ∼29% +76%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
21.4 (19.9min) fps ∼22% +35%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
20.9 (16.9min) fps ∼22% +32%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
19.7 (18.4min) fps ∼21% +25%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
15.8 (14.5min) fps ∼17%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
87.7 (75.1min) fps ∼100% +554%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
52.5 (47.1min) fps ∼60% +292%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
45.6 (41min) fps ∼52% +240%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
39.5 (36.2min) fps ∼45% +195%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
38.9 (26min) fps ∼44% +190%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
36.7 (33.1min) fps ∼42% +174%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
32.4 (29min) fps ∼37% +142%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
27.4 (22.2min) fps ∼31% +104%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (13.4 - 30.4, n=6)
25.7 fps ∼29% +92%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
24.5 (22.1min) fps ∼28% +83%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
19.4 (16.2min) fps ∼22% +45%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
18.4 (17.5min) fps ∼21% +37%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
17.4 (16.3min) fps ∼20% +30%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
13.4 (12.5min) fps ∼15%
X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
87.3 fps ∼100% +533%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
43.3 fps ∼50% +214%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
42.2 fps ∼48% +206%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
42.2 fps ∼48% +206%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
40.6 fps ∼47% +194%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
38.3 fps ∼44% +178%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
33.6 fps ∼38% +143%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
33.6 fps ∼38% +143%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
28.1 fps ∼32% +104%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (13.8 - 42.8, n=5)
27.1 fps ∼31% +96%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
25.5 fps ∼29% +85%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
22.4 fps ∼26% +62%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
21.2 fps ∼24% +54%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
13.8 fps ∼16%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
8.87 fps ∼10% -36%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
76.6 fps ∼100% +686%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
34.4 fps ∼45% +253%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
34.3 fps ∼45% +252%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
32.4 fps ∼42% +232%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
28.9 fps ∼38% +196%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
25.2 fps ∼33% +158%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
20.2 fps ∼26% +107%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (9.75 - 29.5, n=5)
19.2 fps ∼25% +97%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
18.7 fps ∼24% +92%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
18.7 fps ∼24% +92%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
15.3 fps ∼20% +57%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
14.3 fps ∼19% +47%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
13.7 fps ∼18% +41%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
9.75 fps ∼13%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
7.85 fps ∼10% -19%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
66 fps ∼100% +672%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
31 fps ∼47% +263%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
30.4 fps ∼46% +256%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
28.9 fps ∼44% +238%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
26.2 fps ∼40% +206%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
23.6 fps ∼36% +176%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
17.3 fps ∼26% +102%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
17.3 fps ∼26% +102%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
17.2 fps ∼26% +101%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (8.55 - 25.1, n=5)
16.6 fps ∼25% +94%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
13.4 fps ∼20% +57%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
12.9 fps ∼20% +51%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
12.8 fps ∼19% +50%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
8.55 fps ∼13%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
8.33 fps ∼13% -3%
low med. high ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 51.4 37.1 15.8 13.4 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 9.11 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 13.8 9.75 8.55 fps

Emissions — Quiet Most of the Time

System Noise

Fan noise is almost always quiet during low to low-medium loads like browsing or streaming. When running the first benchmark scene of 3DMark 06, fan noise would slowly increase to 27.9 dB(A) before falling back down to a barely noticeable 25.9 dB(A).

When running more demanding loads like games for longer periods, fan noise would steadily increase until maxing out at 43 dB(A) which is not an uncommon upper-range for Ultrabooks. It's unlikely users will experience this maximum unless if the CPU is constantly under stressful loads.

Cooling solution consists of two ~45 mm fans with two copper heat pipes between them
Cooling solution consists of two ~45 mm fans with two copper heat pipes between them
Our unit would exhibit very slight electronic noise or coil whine when placing an ear near the keyboard keys
Our unit would exhibit very slight electronic noise or coil whine when placing an ear near the keyboard keys
One DDR4 SODIMM slot for expansion up to 24 GB total (8 GB soldered + 16 GB expandable)
One DDR4 SODIMM slot for expansion up to 24 GB total (8 GB soldered + 16 GB expandable)
Note the soldered RAM modules adjacent to the CPU
Note the soldered RAM modules adjacent to the CPU
Fan noise profile (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark 06, Green: Prime95 stress)
Fan noise profile (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark 06, Green: Prime95 stress)
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
Honor MagicBook 15
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Noise
9%
-18%
-18%
-10%
off / environment *
24.3
24.2
-0%
26
-7%
30.7
-26%
28
-15%
Idle Minimum *
24.3
24.2
-0%
26
-7%
30.7
-26%
28
-15%
Idle Average *
24.3
24.2
-0%
26
-7%
30.7
-26%
28
-15%
Idle Maximum *
24.3
24.2
-0%
28.8
-19%
30.7
-26%
28
-15%
Load Average *
27.9
24.2
13%
45
-61%
32.7
-17%
28
-0%
Load Maximum *
43
25.3
41%
45
-5%
38.4
11%
41.9
3%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
24.3 / 24.3 / 24.3 dB(A)
Load
27.9 / 43 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.637.834.837.82533.231.727.529.43133.626.324.924.34025.127.524.924.75023.326.425.922.96326.926.322.1238024.3232625.110022.920.522.122.212520.31920.320.516016.116.116.820.920016.316.516.921.525016.615.817.323.731517.917.820.630.340014.61516.426.450013.813.614.329.763012.912.612.831.580011.811.411.930.7100012.311.311.130.7125011.61110.929.3160011.511.110.629.320001211.311.328.9250011.511.3