Notebookcheck Logo

SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N vs Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB

SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

► remove from comparison  PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

The SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N is a very fast high end PCIe Gen 4x4 NVMe SSD in the M.2 2280 form factor. It offers 1TB flash memory and is one of the fastest drives in 2023.

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB

► remove from comparison  970 EVO Plus 1TB

The Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe M.2 SSD 1TB (MZ-V7S1T0BW) is a fast PCIe Gen 3.0 x4 drive that uses the Samsung Phoenix controller. It uses Samsung V-NAND 3-bit MLC memory and includes 1GB low power DDR4 SDRAM. The drive is rated with up to 3.500 MB/s sequential read and 3.300 MB/s sequential write performance.

SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101NSamsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
TypeSSDSSD
SizeM.2 2280M.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB1024 GB
InterfaceNVMeNVMe
Announced16.12.2022 22.01.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd - PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
34.7 pt (40%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.717 -98%
...
33.5 -3%
33.8 -3%
34.1 -2%
34.2 -1%
SanDisk PC SN5100S 2TB
34.2 -1%
34.3 -1%
Kingston OM8TAP42048K1-A00
34.3 -1%
34.4 -1%
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
34.4 -1%
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
34.7
34.9 1%
Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0
35 1%
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
35.2 1%
SK Hynix HFS002TEJ9X162N
36 4%
36.1 4%
36.3 5%
36.3 5%
36.4 5%
36.8 6%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4TB
87.8 153%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - DiskSpd - 970 EVO Plus 1TB
32.7 pt (37%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.717 -98%
...
31.8 -3%
32.2 -2%
32.4 -1%
32.4 -1%
32.5 -1%
32.5 -1%
Kingston OM3PGP4512Q
32.5 -1%
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
32.5 -1%
32.6 0%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
32.7
32.8 0%
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
32.8 0%
32.8 0%
WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101
33 1%
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
33.1 1%
SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N
33.2 2%
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
33.3 2%
YMTC PC41Q-1TB-B
33.4 2%
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
33.4 2%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4TB
87.8 169%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 525.39     avg: 2049     median: 2221.4 (37%)     max: 2916.7 MB/s
min: 791.06     avg: 1521     median: 1064.5 (18%)     max: 5984 MB/s
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 331.05     avg: 869     median: 936.7 (35%)     max: 1290.25 MB/s
min: 254.85     avg: 698     median: 522.6 (19%)     max: 2694 MB/s
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 453.24     avg: 3083     median: 3209.2 (12%)     max: 5331.41 MB/s
min: 1710     avg: 2133     median: 2151 (8%)     max: 2383 MB/s
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 4390     avg: 6630     median: 5909 (36%)     max: 10562 Points
min: 4450     avg: 5812     median: 5919 (36%)     max: 6452 Points
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 1856     avg: 3782     median: 3832.5 (53%)     max: 5157 Points
min: 1134     avg: 2539     median: 2701 (37%)     max: 2923 Points
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 953     avg: 1929     median: 1531 (24%)     max: 3793 Points
min: 1846     avg: 2171     median: 2147.5 (34%)     max: 2708 Points
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.017     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.08 ms
min: 0.02     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.054 ms
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.017     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.062 ms
min: 0.031     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.068 ms
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 1398.51     avg: 3194     median: 3294.3 (56%)     max: 4380.62 MB/s
min: 708     avg: 2144     median: 2300 (39%)     max: 2512 MB/s
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 358.94     avg: 1335     median: 935.8 (18%)     max: 3130.95 MB/s
min: 1579     avg: 1839     median: 1796 (35%)     max: 2340 MB/s
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 144.39     avg: 213.5     median: 209 (41%)     max: 285.8 MB/s
min: 86.3     avg: 131.2     median: 130.2 (25%)     max: 188.1 MB/s
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 51     avg: 64.5     median: 63.3 (20%)     max: 79.4 MB/s
min: 27.86     avg: 51.2     median: 52.6 (17%)     max: 71.1 MB/s
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 2489.13     avg: 3747     median: 3521.4 (31%)     max: 5879.9 MB/s
min: 2469     avg: 2633     median: 2616.5 (23%)     max: 2858 MB/s
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 3522     avg: 5297     median: 5338.9 (42%)     max: 5891.83 MB/s
min: 2173     avg: 2800     median: 2880.5 (23%)     max: 3002 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Write
min: 475.4     avg: 501     median: 505 (47%)     max: 522 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Read
min: 565     avg: 584     median: 568 (44%)     max: 620 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Write
min: 115.7     avg: 136.9     median: 135.1 (4%)     max: 160 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Read
min: 58.3     avg: 63.2     median: 63.3 (1%)     max: 68.1 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Write
min: 728     avg: 1078     median: 1186 (13%)     max: 1320 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Read
min: 609     avg: 953     median: 1095 (23%)     max: 1155 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Write
min: 1411     avg: 1643     median: 1744 (16%)     max: 1773 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Read
min: 1180     avg: 1775     median: 1895 (22%)     max: 2251 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 75.83     avg: 184.8     median: 158.5 (14%)     max: 327.4 MB/s
min: 86.5     avg: 155.5     median: 159.8 (14%)     max: 238.3 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 47.1     avg: 68.8     median: 66.3 (2%)     max: 88.82 MB/s
min: 40.45     avg: 51.6     median: 52.2 (1%)     max: 76.7 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 2686     avg: 4069     median: 3745 (20%)     max: 5431 MB/s
min: 1197     avg: 2660     median: 2988 (16%)     max: 3241 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 4204     avg: 5010     median: 4834 (52%)     max: 5672 MB/s
min: 1018     avg: 2390     median: 2586 (28%)     max: 3037 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 171.6     avg: 469     median: 501 (10%)     max: 576.6 MB/s
min: 288.6     avg: 446.9     median: 504.1 (11%)     max: 569 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 305.2     avg: 519     median: 462 (7%)     max: 782.5 MB/s
min: 332     avg: 544     median: 587.5 (9%)     max: 715 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 2683     avg: 5475     median: 5964.5 (40%)     max: 6386 MB/s
min: 3227     avg: 3296     median: 3295.5 (22%)     max: 3339 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 5782     avg: 6936     median: 7034.5 (38%)     max: 7303 MB/s
min: 3477     avg: 3551     median: 3561 (19%)     max: 3571 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
min: 343     avg: 424     median: 429 (9%)     max: 478 MB/s
1656 MB/s (33%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
min: 614.4     avg: 1018     median: 1092.5 (16%)     max: 1157 MB/s
2076 MB/s (31%)
PCMark 8 - PCMark 8 Storage v2
5079 Points (99%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 77.7     avg: 183.8     median: 165.1 (38%)     max: 335 MB/s
min: 39.77     avg: 160.1     median: 183 (42%)     max: 232 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 54.3     avg: 67.2     median: 64.9 (19%)     max: 85 MB/s
min: 13.65     avg: 50.9     median: 53 (15%)     max: 78.2 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 148.5     avg: 1086     median: 517 (8%)     max: 3719 MB/s
min: 140.4     avg: 2317     median: 2668 (40%)     max: 2685 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 353     avg: 1883     median: 975.5 (12%)     max: 5829 MB/s
min: 97.3     avg: 1929     median: 1865 (23%)     max: 3256 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 1690     avg: 3728     median: 3614 (35%)     max: 5181 MB/s
min: 208.9     avg: 2645     median: 2820 (27%)     max: 3244 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2511     avg: 3948     median: 4064.5 (43%)     max: 5665 MB/s
min: 338.3     avg: 2475     median: 2648 (28%)     max: 2999 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 2382     avg: 5747     median: 6100.5 (42%)     max: 6497 MB/s
min: 202     avg: 3081     median: 3278 (22%)     max: 3327 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 6508     avg: 6957     median: 7008.5 (44%)     max: 7177 MB/s
min: 456.1     avg: 3291     median: 3517 (22%)     max: 3562 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 4259     avg: 6269     median: 6576.5 (40%)     max: 7171 MB/s
min: 455.8     avg: 3212     median: 3505 (21%)     max: 3560 MB/s
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Average Benchmarks

SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N → 100% n=33

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB → 110% n=33

Average of the median scores above. 1 ... This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Amazon Logo
  • $479.99
    SK Hynix Platinum P51 2TB PCIe Gen5 NVMe M.2 2280 Internal SSD I Up to 14,700 MB/s Read, 13,400 MB/s Write I Powered by 238-Layer NAND Flash
  • $69.00
    SK Hynix SSD 512GB M.2 2280 PCIe Gen3 x4 PC601 HFS512GD9TNG for Laptop Desktop Ultrabook
  • $149.99
    SK hynix 1TB Internal SSD, SATA III 2.5-inch, Silver S32 Series, TLC NAND Flash, 560MB/s Read Speed, 510MB/s Write Speed
  • $15.99
    SK hynix Haechi H01 NVMe M.2 SSD Heatsink for PS5 CFI-1000 / CFI-1100 / CFI-1200 Models Only | Perfect fit with SK hynix Platinum P41 SSD
  • SK Hynix 8 GB DDR4 Desktop Ram (2Rx8) 1.2 Volt

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 20. 11:44:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3975 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3348 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1781948641s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Jun 2026 23:08:37 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3975 +0.004s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 3975 +0.019s ... 0.025s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3348 +0.003s ... 0.028s

#10 got single benchmarks 3348 +0.014s ... 0.042s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.057s ... 0.099s

#13 return log +0.502s ... 0.601s

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > HDD/SSD Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)