Notebookcheck Logo

XMG Focus 15 (Clevo NP50HK) gaming laptop review: RTX 3050 Ti at its limits

High TGP, high noise level. Considering its GeForce RTX 3050 Ti, the XMG Focus 15 from Schenker Technologies aims to attract price conscious gamers. We ran the 15-inch laptop through extensive tests.

The XMG Focus 15 can be individually configured on the manufacturer's bestware.com homepage. However, in contrast to many other laptops from Schenker Technologies, the configuration options turn out quite meager. There is currently only a single option for the display (Full-HD IPS with 144 Hz), the graphics card (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti), and the processor (Core i7-11800H). You will find more choices for the working memory ranging from 8 to a maximum of 64 GB, and the storage, using either an M.2 SSD and/or a 2.5-inch hard drive. Primarily due to the 2.5-inch slot, the battery capacity is only 49 Wh. To allow for a longer battery life, we would have preferred to see two M.2 slots here. The customer also has a choice for the communication module, the keyboard language, and the operating system.

The price of the XMG Focus 15 starts from 1199 Euros (~$1401). Our tested configuration with 32 GB of dual-channel RAM and a 1-TB SSD ends up costing more than 1500 Euros (~$1753), which is quite a lot for an RTX 3050 Ti device.

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 95 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1485 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 75 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 471.68, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, dual channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, NVMe, one M.2 slot (in use), one 2.5-inch-slot (empty)
Soundcard
Realtek ALC256 @ Intel Tiger Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1 headset, 1 microphone, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 22 x 360 x 238 ( = 0.87 x 14.17 x 9.37 in)
Battery
49 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 150 W power supply, Control Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.94 kg ( = 68.43 oz / 4.28 pounds), Power Supply: 438 g ( = 15.45 oz / 0.97 pounds)
Price
1512 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

The competitors include other 15-inch laptops with a graphics card of the upper mid-range or lower high-end such as the Dell XPS 15 9510, the Asus TUF F15 FX506HM, the Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH, and the Ryzen edition of the Alienware m15 R5. All these laptops are listed in our comparison charts.

Possible Competitors for Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.2 %
09/2021
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080
88.4 %
08/2021
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3456x2160
85.9 %
06/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.4 %
09/2021
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.7 %
06/2021
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.85 mm15.60"1920x1080

Case

The case, which is based on a Barebone from Clevo (NP50HK case), appears inconspicuous in almost every regard. Besides the design, which is kept rather simple, the rest of the aspects are also unspectacular. The 15-inch laptop mostly shows clean workmanship and a good stability, even though in some places, the plastic surfaces can be pressed in with use of some force. However, this never becomes an annoyance in practical operation. The hinges are also solid. Although the base unit also lifts up slightly when opening the lid, the display can still be opened with a single hand.

XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15

The highlight of the case is its low weight. 1.9 kg (~4.2 lb) is the lowest value in the test field, which is also shared by the Dell XPS 15. The RTX 3060 laptops bring between 2.3 and 2.5 kg (~5-5.5 lb) to the scale. The Focus 15 also scores with its slim build. The height of only 2.2 cm (~0.9 in) ensures a slim look and together with the moderate weight ensures good mobility.

Size Comparison

363 mm / 14.3 inch 261 mm / 10.3 inch 26 mm / 1.024 inch 2.5 kg5.44 lbs359 mm / 14.1 inch 256 mm / 10.1 inch 24.9 mm / 0.98 inch 2.3 kg5 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 238 mm / 9.37 inch 22 mm / 0.866 inch 1.9 kg4.28 lbs356.2 mm / 14 inch 272.5 mm / 10.7 inch 22.85 mm / 0.9 inch 2.5 kg5.42 lbs345 mm / 13.6 inch 230 mm / 9.06 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 1.9 kg4.27 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Equipment

Connections

Those who can make do without Thunderbolt should be satisfied with the connection equipment of the Focus 15. While the left side offers an opening for the Kensington Lock, two USB-A ports (1x 2.0, 1x 3.0), and two audio outputs for a microphone and headset, the right side presents a full-size card reader, one USB-C port (3.2 Gen2), an additional USB-A-Port (3.0), and an RJ45 port with a folding mechanism. Finally the connections for power and the display output (HDMI 2.0, Mini-DisplayPort 1.4) are located in  the back.

Since some of the connections are placed in the back and the USB ports are distributed well, there should be sufficient space for using an external mouse.

Left side: Kensington Lock, USB-A 3.0, USB-A 2.0, microphone, headset
Left side: Kensington Lock, USB-A 3.0, USB-A 2.0, microphone, headset
Right side: card reader, USB-C 3.2 Gen2, USB-A 3.0, RJ45 LAN
Right side: card reader, USB-C 3.2 Gen2, USB-A 3.0, RJ45 LAN
Back: Mini-DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, power connection
Back: Mini-DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, power connection

SD Card Reader

The built-in card reader supports the SD, SDHC, and SDXC card formats and offers a mediocre performance. During sequential reading and while transferring photos, you can expect around 80 to 90 MB/s. For comparison, the Dell XPS 15 cracks the 200-MB mark using our AV Pro 128 GB V60 reference card. All the other competitors do not offer a card reader.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
224 MB/s +177%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
81 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
202.8 MB/s +123%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
91 MB/s

Communication

Our test unit uses an Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 as the communication module. In addition to WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, it also supports Bluetooth 5.1. In our range test (1m distance to the Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router), the Focus 15 achieves very good results with 1500 Mbit/s when sending and more than 1300 Mbit/s when receiving data. With these values, it achieves the first and third place in our test field, respectively.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1482 (759min - 1594max) MBit/s
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1371 (925min - 1499max) MBit/s -7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1368 (669min - 1440max) MBit/s -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
787 (675min - 851max) MBit/s -47%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
561 (310min - 825max) MBit/s -62%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s +5%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1330 (711min - 1563max) MBit/s +1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1319 (1015min - 1489max) MBit/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1318 (667min - 1344max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
878 (827min - 896max) MBit/s -33%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
828 (634min - 900max) MBit/s -37%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1295 (667-1344)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1457 (759-1594)

Webcam

As usual, you should not expect too much from the webcam. The image sharpness and color reproduction are rather limited.

ColorChecker
24.3 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
18 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Focus 15: 21.09 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 33.64 ∆E

Accessories

The box includes a quick start manual, a driver DVD, a USB stick with software, and screws for the 2.5-inch slot. The power supply of the Focus 15 is a pleasantly light and compact 150-Watt model.

Maintenance

In order to access the insides, you have to first remove a total of 15 Philips screws from the bottom of the case. You can then lift off the bottom cover with only little use of force. As typical for Clevo cases, the maintenance options are very good. In addition to the battery, the WLAN module, and the working memory, you can also access the M.2 and the 2.5-inch slot. The cooling system consists of two fans, with several heat pipes running from each of them to the CPU and GPU (soldered in, so they cannot be replaced).

XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15

Warranty

The basic warranty lasts for 2 years (6 months quick repair). At an additional cost, up to 3 years of quick repair are also available for the whole warranty period.

Input Devices

Keyboard

We already know the keyboard from other Clevo Barebones. The chicklet model that can be illuminated in several colors and levels offers a dedicated number block and a fairly good typing experience. Buyers should also be pleased with the comfortable key size. In addition to the WASD keys, the arrow keys also have a decent size. The typing noise is neither very quiet nor particularly loud, settling in the middle of the field. A positive point is the ample size of the palm rest due to the high positioning of the keyboard.

Touchpad

The touchpad is also impressive. About 12 x 7.3 cm (~4.7 x 2.9 in) are quite a lot for a 15-inch laptop. Following the current trend, this is a ClickPad without dedicated keys. With the smooth surface and good accuracy, mouse movements succeed very smoothly. However, the manufacturer should improve on the stability. Particularly the left and right edge of the pad can be pressed down more than usual. The same problem is also found in the 17-inch model, which will receive a review evaluation shortly.

Display

The display consists of a classic IPS panel with a 1920x1080 pixel resolution and refresh rate of 144 Hz. 

361
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 418 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 376.1 cd/m² Minimum: 24 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²
Contrast: 1020:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.98
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
SDC414D, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
B156HAN12.H, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
36%
-35%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
64.6
99.9
55%
41.9
-35%
65.4
1%
sRGB Coverage
95.3
100
5%
62.9
-34%
96.3
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.5
98.1
48%
43.3
-35%
67.5
2%
Response Times
74%
-102%
10%
42%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18 ?(9.2, 8.8)
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
80%
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
-58%
13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8)
24%
4 ?(1.2, 2.8)
78%
Response Time Black / White *
8.8 ?(3.6, 5.2)
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
68%
21.6 ?(11.6, 10)
-145%
9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8)
-5%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
5%
PWM Frequency
59.5 ?(99)
Screen
49%
-99%
-40%
-13%
Brightness middle
418
362
-13%
268.3
-36%
350
-16%
329
-21%
Brightness
376
367
-2%
257
-32%
350
-7%
321
-15%
Brightness Distribution
83
97
17%
84
1%
96
16%
92
11%
Black Level *
0.41
0.06
85%
0.34
17%
0.3
27%
0.27
34%
Contrast
1020
6033
491%
789
-23%
1167
14%
1219
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.67
2.1
-26%
5.05
-202%
3.9
-134%
2.78
-66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.88
4.1
-6%
15.43
-298%
8.2
-111%
4.88
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.98
2.5
-155%
3.21
-228%
1.6
-63%
1.63
-66%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
1.4
52%
5.5
-90%
5.5
-90%
2.5
14%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.18 101%
2.35 94%
2.15 102%
2.106 104%
CCT
6209 105%
6608 98%
7392 88%
7414 88%
6201 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
76
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
53% / 50%
-79% / -86%
-10% / -24%
15% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

On the positive side, we have especially the good brightness. Almost 376 cd/m² at maximum brightness represent the best value in our test field, closely followed by the OLED panel of the Dell XPS 15 with 367 cd/m². This means that you can also use the 15-inch laptop easily outdoors.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Saturation
CalMAN: Saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

Due to the black value being less than optimal (0.41 cd/m²) the contrast value only places in the middle of the field. But about 1000:1 should be sufficient for most buyers. On the other hand, the good color reproduction deserves some positive points. The 15-inch screen offers a balanced image already in the state of delivery.

XMG Focus 15 vs sRGB
XMG Focus 15 vs sRGB
Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid
XMG Focus 15 vs AdobeRGB
XMG Focus 15 vs AdobeRGB

For the color space coverage, we measure 95% sRGB and 66% AdobeRGB. These are relative good values for a gaming laptop. The measured response times of 8.8 ms black-to-white and 18 ms grey-to-grey are similar to those of other IPS panels with 144 Hz.

Back light
Back light
Viewing angle
Viewing angle

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 8.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Test Conditions

The preinstalled Control Center allows adjusting various system settings. Our tests were performed in the Performance mode using the automatic fan control.

Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center

Performance

Despite our test unit bringing an octa-core CPU, 32 GB of RAM, and a 1-TB SSD, the XMG Focus 15 "only" settles in the mid-range. The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti is meant more for the occasional gamer who doesn't need to play every new game at maximum details and who doesn't pose particularly high demands on getting a future-proof device.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

Processor

In the mobile gaming area, Intel's Core i7-11800H is currently one of the most successful processors. The 10-nm model contains 24 MB L3 cache and is able to operate on 16 threads simultaneously via Hyper Threading. Under load, the clock speed is between 2.3 and a maximum of 4.6 GHz.

In our Cinebench loop, the Focus 15 only turns out average. Even though the CPU performance remains fairly constant over a longer time period and ranges above that of the Dell XPS 15, the Core i7-11800H still achieves better benchmark results in other laptops (see the Asus TUF F15, for example). The Focus 15 also has a hard time in the comparison with laptops that are based on the Ryzen 7 5800H. However, since most 3D applications are limited by the GPU, gamers don't have to worry about any limitations when playing games.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1723 (1688.33-1770.15)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H; Ultra Performance: Ø1663 (1589.38-2024.19)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1625 (1566.05-2009.95)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1997 (1963.38-2095.12)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2123 (2107.59-2141.44)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1977 (1921.88-2004.51)
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)
19581 Points +81%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
13445 (12565.7min - 13444.6max) Points +24%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13028 Points +20%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12195 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6508 - 14088, n=48)
11650 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
10816 Points
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
10531 Points -3%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)
1816 Points +31%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
1509 Points +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1498 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1522, n=45)
1497 Points +8%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1430 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1410 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1390 Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)
7442 Points +73%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5182 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5020 Points +17%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4711 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2498 - 5408, n=50)
4459 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
4307 Points
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
3848 Points -11%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)
699 Points +30%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=47)
576 Points +7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
559 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
550 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
536 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)
3101 Points +75%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2119 Points +20%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
2095 (1963.38min - 2095.12max) Points +18%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2024 Points +14%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2010 Points +14%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2005 (1921.88min - 2004.51max) Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=50)
1894 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1770 (1688.33min - 1770.15max) Points
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)
268 Points +28%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
225 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (201 - 231, n=46)
225 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
210 Points
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
298 Seconds * -7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
278 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 454, n=46)
277 Seconds * -0%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
253 Seconds * +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
239 Seconds * +14%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
235 Seconds * +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
198.9 Seconds * +28%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)
77274 MIPS +62%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53902 MIPS +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53239 MIPS +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
51046 MIPS +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (33718 - 56758, n=46)
48384 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
47642 MIPS
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
42570 MIPS -11%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)
6133 MIPS +19%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5659 MIPS +10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5591 MIPS +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5732, n=46)
5492 MIPS +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5448 MIPS +5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
5427 MIPS +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
5164 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)
13627 Points +50%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
9073 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4655 - 9851, n=40)
8551 Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
8164 Points -10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7522 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7508 Points -17%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)
1811 Points +22%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1429 - 1625, n=40)
1561 Points +5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1540 Points +4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1481 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1480 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1462 Points -1%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +55%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.6 fps +14%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15 fps +9%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.7 fps +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (7.38 - 17.4, n=46)
13.8 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.7 fps
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.4 fps -9%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
113 s * -139%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57.4 s * -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)
49.1 s * -4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.3 s *
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 59.9, n=45)
46.5 s * +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.5 s * +6%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.601 sec *
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.567 sec * +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.615, n=46)
0.566 sec * +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.539 sec * +10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.524 sec * +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)
0.4687 sec * +22%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1770 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
221 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
210 Points
Help

System Performance

Not the least due to the fast SSD, the 15-inch laptop ends up in first place in the system tests. 6478 points in PCMark 10 result in third place, with the Schenker laptop performing at eye level with the test configuration of the Alienware m15 R5.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)
7592 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6865 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6648 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6478 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
6465 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6019 - 6556, n=5)
6355 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6019 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)
10731 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10522 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
10396 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10171 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9490 - 10846, n=5)
10071 Points -1%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
9589 Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9490 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9728 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)
9725 Points +13%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8913 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8859 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8639 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8176 - 8723, n=5)
8466 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
8344 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)
11476 Points +37%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9423 Points +12%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8582 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8399 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7475 - 8577, n=5)
8175 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7884 Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7475 Points -11%
PCMark 10 Score
6478 points
Help

DPC Latencies

Even though the XMG Focus 15 shows relatively low latencies compared to the competitors, according to the LatencyMon tool, it is only suited to a limited extent for real-time audio and video processing. At least, that is the case in the state of delivery without any manual tuning.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1914 μs * -239%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1431 μs * -154%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
703 μs * -25%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
564 μs *
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
428.6 μs * +24%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Solution

Our test unit is equipped with a powerful Samsung SSD. The 1-TB version of the 970 Evo Plus surpasses the Solid State Drives in all the competing devices, be they from Micron, SK Hynix, or Toshiba. The M.2 drive offers a first-rate performance while reading as well as writing data.

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-26%
-17%
-16%
-38%
Write 4K
238.3
109.3
-54%
168.1
-29%
124.6
-48%
116.9
-51%
Read 4K
55.6
53.9
-3%
65.1
17%
54.2
-3%
44.56
-20%
Write Seq
3013
1991
-34%
2124
-30%
2706
-10%
1552
-48%
Read Seq
2879
1759
-39%
2204
-23%
2298
-20%
1682
-42%
Write 4K Q32T1
569
499.8
-12%
455.3
-20%
499.7
-12%
497.8
-13%
Read 4K Q32T1
715
438.8
-39%
465.6
-35%
570
-20%
436.8
-39%
Write Seq Q32T1
3287
2835
-14%
2911
-11%
2999
-9%
1461
-56%
Read Seq Q32T1
3561
3235
-9%
3519
-1%
3461
-3%
2364
-34%
AS SSD
-53%
-9%
-23%
-64%
Seq Read
2988
1362
-54%
2873
-4%
2960
-1%
2082
-30%
Seq Write
2541
1440
-43%
1619
-36%
2586
2%
825
-68%
4K Read
42.82
38.43
-10%
57.5
34%
46.84
9%
42.41
-1%
4K Write
87
121.4
40%
149.6
72%
96.1
10%
98.3
13%
4K-64 Read
2096
370.5
-82%
1252
-40%
854
-59%
1255
-40%
4K-64 Write
2455
1054
-57%
2196
-11%
2015
-18%
738
-70%
Access Time Read *
0.068
0.042
38%
0.04
41%
0.048
29%
0.109
-60%
Access Time Write *
0.043
0.135
-214%
0.082
-91%
0.094
-119%
0.17
-295%
Score Read
2437
545
-78%
1597
-34%
1197
-51%
1506
-38%
Score Write
2797
1319
-53%
2508
-10%
2370
-15%
918
-67%
Score Total
6452
2160
-67%
4869
-25%
4170
-35%
3136
-51%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-40% / -41%
-13% / -12%
-20% / -20%
-51% / -53%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3561 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3287 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 715 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 569 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2879 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3013 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 238.3 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics Card

In order to get a maximum graphics performance from the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti, the manufacturer configured the Focus 15 with a TGP of 75 watts (incl. Dynamic Boost). With that, the 15-inch laptop moves significantly ahead of the Dell XPS 15, whose RTX 3050 Ti only gets 45 watts, which is only little more than half. This situation is also reflected in the benchmark runs, although the Focus 15 doesn't deliver twice the performance.

The biggest problem of the RTX 3050 Ti is the meager video storage. 4 GB are not up-to-date anymore for a mid-range GPU. It should be at least 6 GB VRAM in 2012. Current games such as "Deathloop" already demand more than 4 GB in Full-HD resolution, even at minimal settings. This means that Nvidia is too frugal here, unnecessarily limiting the future usefulness. You also shouldn't expect a high raytracing performance from the RTX 3050 Ti. In the Port Royal test of the 3DMark benchmark, for example, the result is miserable compared to the RTX 3060, which often runs in similarly priced laptops.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)
40487 Points +105%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
29164 Points +48%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
27898 Points +41%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26881 Points +36%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
19746 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7952 - 20905, n=27)
17562 Points -11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
15387 Points -22%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)
29457 Points +100%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21806 Points +48%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21111 Points +44%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
20312 Points +38%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
14696 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7917 - 15611, n=26)
13090 Points -11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12119 Points -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)
12066 Points +116%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8844 Points +58%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8295 Points +48%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7677 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5594 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (3744 - 6122, n=27)
5177 Points -7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
4591 Points -18%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=155, last 2 years)
7720 Points +1245%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4852 Points +745%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4795 Points +735%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
574 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (280 - 591, n=9)
498 Points -13%
3DMark 11 Performance
19072 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
42503 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13179 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5963 points
Help

Gaming Performance

Despite its meager storage, the RTX 3050 Ti is fast enough to run most games smoothly in the native Full-HD resolution at high to maximum detail settings. Only in badly programmed and/or extremely demanding games such as "Crysis Remastered" does the DirectX-12 chip begin to stumble. While the Focus 15 is still ahead of the Dell XPS 15 here, it finishes significantly behind laptops that use the RTX 3060, which runs around 40% faster.

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=167, last 2 years)
220 fps +116%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
146 fps +43%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
143.9 (136min - 155max) fps +41%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
142 fps +39%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
102 (87min) fps
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
91 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 110, n=26)
88.8 fps -13%

We evaluate how the graphics card behaves under longer 3D load, by running the role play "The Witcher 3" for about 60 minutes (FHD/Ultra). The result is that just like the CPU performance, that of the GPU also remains fairly constant.

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø54.7 (51-57)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø69.6 (65-77)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø73.6 (66-77)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 180 147 74.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 181 102 56
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 175 163 154 145
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 78.9 57.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 133 115 91.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 101 93 86
Strange Brigade (2018) 138 112 96.4
Hunt Showdown (2020) 92.5 79.2
Death Stranding (2020) 98.1 89.3 85.8
Crysis Remastered (2020) 90.4 46.6 31.3
Serious Sam 4 (2020) 83.2 66.7 53.1
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 74.1 68.3
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) 172 151 138
FIFA 21 (2020) 237 205 192
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 79.1 76.2 67.4
Outriders (2021) 76.2 69.5 57.2
Resident Evil Village (2021) 102 101 76.4
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) 115
Days Gone (2021) 91.2 79.8 59
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) 144 143
Deathloop (2021) 72.4 57.4 51.2

Emissions

Noise Emissions

As we already know from other Clevo Barebones, the fan control turns out to be very unfortunate, at least in Performance mode. Instead of allowing the 15-inch laptop to run constantly at a low noise level during idle operation or less demanding scenarios, the fans are either completely quiet or rev up quickly to very noticeable levels. Things then get really annoying with the Focus 15 under load. Noise levels between 56 and 58 dB(A) are not even reached by some RTX 3070 and RTX 3080 laptops. Gaming without headphones is no fun this way. With the exception of the Lenovo Legion 5, which becomes similarly loud during 3D operation, the competitors remain noticeably quieter during the test.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.644.941.235.736.941.42536.637.23735.43741.13144.843.749.243.643.948.84031.230.834.131.53133.45025.730.429.92628.729.26332.73630.925.128.131.7802339.823.519.221.232.610022.433.219.721.118.83512525.528.619.518.217.328.416027.830.521.121.419.130.820027.131.724.922.621.633.425027.433.621.22116.135.131528.737.319.521.315.538.240027.83717.516.814.538.550026.437.116.913.811.837.963028.438.718.711.511.340.280029.840.318.710.810.241.5100032.24319.611.81143.8125033.944.620.411.810.945.916003445.220.611.610.946.5200032.244.419.511.61145.7250031.744.918.312.111.445.8315030.944.114.612.711.945.5400028.845.914.913.412.347.5500028.247.314.213.112.449.1630026.845.613.713.212.547.6800022.442.613.613.112.344.61000017.939.413.412.912.240.91250014.535.712.912.511.837.91600013.929.812.612.111.132.3SPL42.756.23025.524.357.7N410.81.20.70.611.8median 27.8median 39.4median 18.7median 13.1median 12.2median 40.9Delta3.95.62.83.225.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Focus 15

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 30 / 43 dB(A)
Load
56 / 58 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Noise
25%
20%
5%
13%
off / environment *
24
23.8
1%
24.8
-3%
24.2
-1%
24
-0%
Idle Minimum *
25
23.8
5%
24.6
2%
29
-16%
24
4%
Idle Average *
30
23.8
21%
24.9
17%
29
3%
25
17%
Idle Maximum *
43
23.8
45%
24.9
42%
29
33%
35
19%
Load Average *
56
36
36%
27.1
52%
53.5
4%
44
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
56
36
36%
46.4
17%
53.5
4%
48
14%
Load Maximum *
58
38.2
34%
49
16%
53.5
8%
50
14%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

Since the graphics card was throttled during the stress test with the FurMark and Prime95 tools, it is best if we look at the temperature development during our test with "The Witcher 3." After about one hour, the case reaches temperatures of up to 50 °C (122 °F) on top and up to 56 °C (133 °F) on the bottom here. These are again fairly high values for an RTX 3050 Ti device. So the cooling system of the Focus 15 does not seem to be very effective. At almost 30 to 40 °C (86-104 °F) during idle operation, the case surfaces also becomes warmer than usual.

The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
Stress test
Stress test
Max. Load
 42 °C
108 F
43 °C
109 F
41 °C
106 F
 
 41 °C
106 F
42 °C
108 F
42 °C
108 F
 
 33 °C
91 F
32 °C
90 F
31 °C
88 F
 
Maximum: 43 °C = 109 F
Average: 38.6 °C = 101 F
42 °C
108 F
46 °C
115 F
45 °C
113 F
45 °C
113 F
46 °C
115 F
39 °C
102 F
33 °C
91 F
39 °C
102 F
31 °C
88 F
Maximum: 46 °C = 115 F
Average: 40.7 °C = 105 F
Power Supply (max.)  48 °C = 118 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Heat
16%
14%
15%
-13%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
45.5
-6%
46.4
-8%
42.6
1%
62
-44%
Maximum Bottom *
46
44.2
4%
45.4
1%
52.2
-13%
61
-33%
Idle Upper Side *
39
27
31%
26
33%
24.9
36%
36
8%
Idle Bottom *
40
26.7
33%
27.4
31%
25.3
37%
33
17%

* ... smaller is better

Speakers

According to our audio analysis, the sound quality leaves something to be desired. In addition to the bass, the maximum volume could also be better. In terms of the sound, the Dell XPS 15 plays in a much higher league.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.939.8253737.13143.946.64031315028.729.36328.131.98021.229.710018.827.212517.334.816019.133.720021.637.125016.13831515.547.640014.555.150011.858.363011.364.180010.266.310001166.2125010.966.2160010.967.620001169.7250011.466.3315011.966.6400012.361.1500012.463.8630012.561.8800012.362.21000012.261.91250011.8591600011.164.8SPL24.377.5N0.638.9median 12.2median 61.9Delta29.338.33227.426.433.135.832.5372633.920.744.619.453.823.761.318.563.416.765.517.568.317.269.113.169.211.670.810.772.311.171.511.571.710.873.310.781.310.783.11178.61174.811.475.411.869.31274.312.273.712.472.112.369.212.365.611.556.323.888.80.577.6median 11.8median 71.723hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Focus 15Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Management

Power Consumption

Even though the Focus 15 offers graphics switching (Nvidia Optimus), the consumption values in idle operation are quite high at 23 to 29 watts. Most of the competitors consume less than 20 watts. In 3D operation, the power consumption scales up fairly well with the TGP and graphics performance, as the following chart shows.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 2.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 23 / 25 / 29 Watt
Load midlight 106 / 156 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Power Consumption
45%
18%
15%
2%
Idle Minimum *
23
7.6
67%
9.5
59%
7.3
68%
11
52%
Idle Average *
25
9.9
60%
12.1
52%
10.5
58%
14
44%
Idle Maximum *
29
10.8
63%
22.5
22%
15.7
46%
25
14%
Load Average *
106
81
24%
99.5
6%
108
-2%
123
-16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
128
76.2
40%
157
-23%
175
-37%
176
-38%
Load Maximum *
156
131
16%
173.5
-11%
228
-46%
226
-45%

* ... smaller is better

The Witcher 3 Power Consumption

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15: Ø128 (125-133)

Battery Life

For a change, we use the Entertainment mode instead of the Performance mode for the battery tests. When looking at the runtime values, it quickly becomes apparent that the small battery has a negative effect. 49 Wh pales in comparison to the 80 to 90 Wh offered by competitors. In the WLAN test at medium brightness, the Focus 15 only lasts for barely 4 hours, while the Dell XPS 15 manages about 7 hours here, and the Asus TUF F15 even almost 8 hours.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
6h 27min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 55min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 54min
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 49 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
88%
97%
59%
53%
51%
Reader / Idle
387
660
71%
881
128%
WiFi v1.3
235
420
79%
473
101%
290
23%
306
30%
Load
54
106
96%
119
120%
105
94%
55
2%
H.264
624
259
525
Witcher 3 ultra
96

Pros

+ many maintenance options
+ compact size
+ good input devices
+ low weight
+ 144-Hz panel

Cons

- bad fan control
- emissions under load
- weak battery
- no Thunderbolt
- meagre sound

Verdict

XMG Focus 15, test unit provided by Schenker Technologies
XMG Focus 15, test unit provided by Schenker Technologies

Too expensive for what is offered: This is how you could summarize the XMG Focus 15 in a single sentence. While except for some smaller details, the case, input devices, and 144-Hz display are convincing, the 15-inch laptop falls behind the competitors in most of the other categories, be it in the battery life, cooling system, fan control, or the sound.

The high TGP of the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti is a curse and a blessing at the same time.

On one hand, the performance of the Focus 15 is able to leave many competitors with an RTX 3050 Ti behind (such as the Dell XPS 15 - however that is targeted more for multimedia users than gamers). On the other hand, the GeForce RTX 3060 is still a significantly better choice in the price range between 1000 and 1500 Euros (~$1169-1753), even if it is just because of the larger video storage (6 vs 4 GB GDDR6).

In summary, at a few hundred Euros less and with a lower noise level, the Focus 15 would have been an interesting option. But in its current form, we recommend that you buy an alternative laptop.

Price and Availability

The XMG Focus 15 is available in the manufacturer's bestware.com shop starting from 1199 Euros (~$1401).

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 - 09/23/2021 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis
79 / 98 → 80%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
63 / 80 → 79%
Weight
64 / 10-66 → 96%
Battery
57 / 95 → 60%
Display
89%
Games Performance
93%
Application Performance
95%
Temperature
77 / 95 → 81%
Noise
53 / 90 → 59%
Audio
74%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Average
73%
83%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 3 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > XMG Focus 15 (Clevo NP50HK) gaming laptop review: RTX 3050 Ti at its limits
Florian Glaser, 2021-09-30 (Update: 2021-09-30)