LG Gram Style 14 laptop review: Elegant, fast, and (too) hot
The focus of the LG Gram Style 14 is mobility. With its low weight, very small case for the 14-inch display, and long battery life, its strengths are an exact match for this goal. At the same time, with an i5 or i7 processor of the Intel Raptor Lake P series, there are no concessions in terms of the computing performance. The rest of the equipment also fulfills upscale requirements with a 3K OLED display, high-quality input devices, and large as well as fast storage.
What is quite out of the ordinary is the color design of the palm rest and whole display lid, which is anything but ordinary. Depending on the light angle, the appearance changes with numerous colorful facets. On the other hand, the laptop can also remain really discrete, thanks to its passive mode, which is otherwise offered together with similarly powerful equipment only by an Apple MacBook Air 15 M2.
Some other, similarly mobile and fast competitors are, for example, the HP Dragonfly G4 or the Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 with an identical display. Find out in our test, where the competitors do better, where the LG Gram Style does well, and why it still doesn't remain completely quiet.
Possible Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 987 g | 16.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 91.9 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.1 kg | 16.3 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
| 91.8 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 1.5 kg | 11.5 mm | 15.30" | 2880x1864 | |
| 89.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 | |
| 89.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 989 g | 14.8 mm | 13.00" | 2160x1350 | |
| 85.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 85 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 990 g | 10.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Case - Great colors, weak structure
Only at first glance does the case of the LG Gram Style look white. As soon as the light hits it from a side angle, the color changes - even if in a discrete way - including some rainbow effects. Various light sources and changing angles also bring a constantly changing appearance. At the same time, the case surface is relatively immune against fingerprints. However, once we noticed some prints, we were only able to clean them with a moist microfiber cloth.
There are no complaints about the workmanship. The laptop is assembled cleanly and appears stable enough considering its size and weight. Even though the display can be warped, this isn't more than we'd expect from its slim display frame. The case bottom can also be pressed down, so users might get the impression that they have to be particularly gentle when opening the lid or lifting up the LG Gram Style.
The keyboard frame and palm rest, on the other hand, are made from metal, have hardly any give, and offer a solid impression when typing and operating the laptop.
In terms of the weight, none of the competitors can even come close to the subnotebook from LG. The Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro with a display of the same size weighs 20% more. In addition, it is 1 cm (~0.4 in) deeper. The footprint of the Gram Style comes close to an A4-format sheet of paper.
The case thickness, on the other hand, is only average, and many competitors that are focused on minimal size format such as the Apple MacBook Air or Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro are even significantly slimmer. But when carrying the laptop, the thickness of the device probably matters less than its width and length.
Equipment - The basic connections are mostly sufficient
The number of connections couldn't really be smaller, but the two Thunderbolt 4 connections on the left side still open up many usage options. One of the connections also remains available while charging. If you use an additional docking station on your desk, you can connect anything else to that.
On the road, the headset port, slot for microSD cards, and single USB-A port with 10 Gbit/s almost always offer sufficient connection options. Even if the selection of connections seems suitable in terms of practical usability, their number can also be fairly limited.
SD Card Reader
When copying image files, our AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 reference card delivers average values, allowing for example to copy a full 32-GB card in close to 7 minutes.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 5320-TM4V2 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 5320-TM4V2 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Communication
The soldered Intel AX211 WLAN module works at least in the 6 GHz band as expected. Even though there were no other WLAN signals in close proximity that might have interfered with our measurements, the test at 5 GHz produced results that were slightly below average.
In practical use, even almost 1,000 Mbit/s is absolutely excellent. More than 1,600 Mbit/s when using Wi-Fi 6E surpasses a simple LAN connection significantly, as long as the distance to the also Wi-Fi 6E capable router remains as small as possible.
Webcam
The Full-HD webcam is suited well for video calls, and the images achieve a satisfactory quality. The camera particularly succeeds in still delivering an easily recognizable recording in low light conditions. But you only shouldn't wear black at that time, since at least in our test unit, all black clothing is recorded with an extreme green tint.
In addition, there is an infrared camera to support logging in via face recognition. There is no mechanic lense cover.
The microphone is suitable for the targeted usage scenarios. Voices are recorded easily understandable and at an even volume, even when the distance to the speaker and speaking angle varies. A slightly metallic undertone won't interfere at least with video calls.
Maintenance
The sealed bottom plate is not very maintenance friendly. You need some finesse and suitable tools to remove the five glued-on feet and three additional screw covers without causing any damage. But after that, there are no further difficulties removing the bottom plate. However, this might become much more difficult after two or three years of using the laptop. Once the glue has hardened, in our experience it is hardly possible anymore to remove the rubber feet intact.
Inside, the battery and fan are easily accessible. You can also replace or expand the two M.2 NVMe SSDs. A single 2-TB SSD would have worked just as well and allowed for easier storage expansion. At the same time, the two SSDs installed in parallel would also lend themselves for a permanent system backup. The WLAN module and RAM are soldered in, which is not very surprising when considering the slim case.
The display hinges appear a little too delicate. Despite the low weight of the LG Gram, a larger hinge area would have improved the stability of the folding mechanism significantly.
Warranty, Accessories, and Packaging
LG offers a two-year warranty for the Gram Style 14Z90RS, but for the battery, there is only the minimum warranty required by law.
Aside from the charger, the USB-C to USB-C cable (only suitable for charging), and the warranty material, there are no additional accessories in the box. The packaging itself consists almost exclusively of recycled card bord, which deserves some praise. Unfortunately, the LG Gram itself is placed inside a plastic case made from mixed materials, so that cannot be recycled.
Input Devices - A pretty but not always practical Gram Style
The keyboard is almost deserving of the highest praise. Its 1.6-mm stroke (according to our measurements), the well-adjusted resistance, and a robust keyboard frame result in an excellent typing experience. The only negative might be the white illumination of the white keys. When the light gets weaker in the evening hours and you want to activate the keyboard illumination, you will notice that you then won't be able to see anything all on the keys anymore. In complete darkness, however, the illumination is comfortably even, although it could use more than the two brightness levels.
The touchpad operation is accurate, immediately responds to any command, and it is visually pleasing. At the same time, there are also some grave weaknesses. First, its edges are only recognizable by two delicate light strips. While that looks great, we didn't notice that our fingers wandered outside the touchpad area several times during our testing, so that they couldn't operate the touchpad anymore. But you probably would get used to this.
What is really unusual is the feedback to a firm key press. LG doesn't use any mechanical keys in the Gram Style, but an electromagnetic linear actor instead. Perhaps you might already know something like this from the Home button of the iPhones. Unfortunately, the noise of the key press seems much too loud to us. This is particularly the case, when the passive mode is activated and the laptop remains otherwise completely quiet.
Even though the key noise is of course controlled by software, this behavior cannot be turned off or adjusted. Although the regular operation is also possible without pressing the touchpad keys, we also noticed that the key press is also activated and becomes audible when the finger touches the pad for a longer time period. In that case, the feedback becomes doubly irritating, since no key has been pressed.
Display - OLED with strong color reproduction
The OLED display in the LG Gram Style 14 subnotebook offers all the amenities that are to be expected. Thanks to the minimal black value, the contrast turns out very good, resulting in vivid and bright colors. Even without calibration, the color reproduction is very accurate, and the extent of the color space is very large.
The resolution of 2,880 x 1,800 pixels, widely called 3K, allows for extreme detailed images. But at only 14 inches, this also seems a bit exaggerated. If your zoom level is at 100%, text can hardly be read anymore. A slightly lower resolution that also would save a bit more on the battery life would surely be sufficient at this size, while high resolution photography would still continue to look excellent on the screen.
LG is able to significantly remedy one of the large weaknesses of OLED displays. Where other models show some PWM flickering of 60 or 120 Hz, the Gram Style is able to at least increase the frequency to 350 Hz, a value that most users shouldn't be able to register anymore. Only those who are particularly sensitive and have some prior bad experiences might still be able to notice some flickering. At that point, the only thing that will help is choosing a laptop with an IPS panel that doesn't use PWM flickering such as the HP Dragonfly G4.
The subpixel grid could bring some slightly washed-out edges. However, the resolution is high enough that you basically might only see this under the magnifying glass - and even then, only barely. There are no light halos or screen bleeding. Even looking at it with long exposure, the display remains completely black.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 380 cd/m²
Contrast: 7111:1 (Black: 0.054 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.81
ΔE Greyscale 2.63 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.92% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Samsung SDC417F ATNA40YK10-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Dragonfly G4 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 MND007ZA1-3, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Samsung ATNA40CU02-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -20% | -3% | -7% | -19% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.92 | 68.4 -32% | 98.7 -1% | 89.8 -10% | 68.5 -31% | 99.7 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.3 -2% | 99.9 0% | 99.4 -1% | 99.5 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.71 | 70.4 -26% | 87.9 -7% | 84.2 -11% | 69.7 -26% | 95.7 1% |
| Response Times | -1903% | -1093% | 14440% | -1543% | 46% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 48.8 ? -2340% | 28.8 ? -1340% | 20 ? -900% | 39.9 ? -1895% | 0.5 ? 75% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 31.3 ? -1465% | 18.9 ? -845% | 7 ? -250% | 25.8 ? -1190% | 0.1 ? 95% |
| PWM Frequency | 350 | 156000 ? 44471% | 240 ? -31% | |||
| Screen | -50% | -50% | -37% | -37% | 61% | |
| Brightness middle | 384 | 408.8 6% | 517 35% | 595 55% | 461.2 20% | 409 7% |
| Brightness | 388 | 399 3% | 501 29% | 550 42% | 428 10% | 410 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 90 -7% | 93 -4% | 85 -12% | 86 -11% | 99 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.054 | 0.32 -493% | 0.39 -622% | 0.25 -363% | 0.29 -437% | 0.01 81% |
| Contrast | 7111 | 1278 -82% | 1326 -81% | 2380 -67% | 1590 -78% | 40900 475% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.47 | 2.02 18% | 1.2 51% | 2.01 19% | 1.79 28% | 2.36 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.33 | 3.84 11% | 2.5 42% | 6.9 -59% | 3.3 24% | 4.07 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.81 | 0.61 78% | 0.8 72% | 1.22 57% | 0.47 83% | 3.16 -12% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.63 | 2.3 13% | 1.8 32% | 2.74 -4% | 1.8 32% | 3.06 -16% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.4 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.49 88% |
| CCT | 6279 104% | 6203 105% | 6319 103% | 6588 99% | 6882 94% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -658% /
-308% | -382% /
-189% | 4799% /
2864% | -533% /
-248% | 36% /
46% |
* ... smaller is better
The color reproduction offers the usual wide extent. The basically full coverage of the DCI-P3 color space that is used for professional video production is remarkable.
The display is definitely sufficient for higher demands in all cases, and you can also use it for image and video processing at a very high level.
At a DeltaE of less than 3, the deviations in the color reproduction are not noticeable anymore, even for the trained eye. While the deviations are slightly higher in several blue and red color tones, at a DeltaE of barely above 4, they are still very limited.
An additional calibration did not bring any further improvement.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 350 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 350 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 350 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
The brightness of the OLED display is sufficient for text to be readable outdoors. While images don't look quite as vibrant anymore, they are still easily recognizable. In direct sunlight, the reflective surface prevents reading of the screen contents.
Regardless of the viewing angle, there are no color changes or any dimming of the brightness. Only at a steep viewing angle of almost 90°, some slight deviations are noticeable. This is typical behavior for an OLED display.
Performance - The i7-1360P remains powerful even in power saving mode
With the Intel Core i7-1360P, the LG Gram Style 14 uses a CPU that impresses with a high performance as well as good mobility. In addition, there is 32 GB of LPDDR5 working memory that ensures fast data rates with a maximum bandwidth of 6,000 MHz.
With this, the computing performance is at the approximate level of a good business laptop. Complex applications pose no difficulties for the LG Gram Style, and neither does multitasking. On the other hand, graphically very demanding applications are hardly usable. The performance of the iGPU is sufficient for video streaming and even a little bit of image and video processing in the non-commercial realm. But 3D applications and video rendering can hardly run in a reasonable manner.
We were unable to run CPU-Z with our test unit, and the program continued to cause some blue screens even after a system reset.
Test Conditions
The preinstalled LG Smart Assistant offers some very practical setting options. In addition to the options of a dark mode that in combination with the OLED display can extend the battery life noticeably, or of changing the color temperature, the Usage Scenarios also have some significant effects on the behavior of the subnotebook. In the "Work" mode, the LG Gram Style offers the highest computing performance. In "Study" mode, it switches to quiet operation and limits the intensity of blue light in the display.
But particularly, the selected Cooling Mode has the most influence on the computing performance. We list the power consumption limits of the CPU in the table below. Since the High fan setting offers the best computing performance, we use that to create our benchmark measurements.
| Fan Profile | No Noise | Low | Normal | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU PL2 | 43 watts | 43 watts | 43 watts | 43 watts |
| CPU PL1 | 8 watts | 12 watts | 26 watts | 28 watts |
Processor
The Intel Core i7-1360P is characterized by a total of twelve cores, four of which are Performance cores, and 16 Threads as well as a clock speed of 5.0 GHz. It is currently one of the fastest mobile processors. However, it is unable to keep up with an Intel Core i5-13500H, whose construction reminds of a desktop CPU and which also needs significantly more space and power.
In addition to the computing performance, a second strength is the efficiency of the processor. It hardly consumes any power for most simple tasks and warms up correspondingly little, hardly needing any cooling. This is even more the case in the LG Gram Style, since with a peak consumption of 43 watts, the CPU is only allowed to consume less power than for example that in the Huawei MateBook X Pro, which provides up to 64 watts. So it is not very surprising, that the competitors with identical processor perform slightly better overall.
In the constant load test with Cinebench R15, the resulting chart resembles that of most comparable subnotebooks. Due to the limited cooling options, the values drop by about 20% after the first run. After that, they remain comfortably stable, which speaks for sufficient power of the cooling.
When pulling the plug, the setting options and limits for the CPU performance we listed above remain unchanged. This means that the LG Gram also keeps its full performance in battery operation.
You can find additional benchmarks and more information in our CPU benchmark list.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB -5! | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (6390 - 12637, n=16) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1596 - 1909, n=16) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (2474 - 4887, n=16) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (611 - 736, n=16) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1079 - 2214, n=16) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (180 - 271, n=16) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (268 - 496, n=17) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (26534 - 52959, n=16) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (4647 - 5973, n=16) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (7549 - 10817, n=17) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1435 - 1871, n=17) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (6.9 - 14.2, n=16) | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (40.3 - 57.2, n=16) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (0.445 - 0.583, n=16) | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (5610 - 11188, n=17) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (29251 - 56942, n=16) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1444 - 2728, n=16) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (65324 - 89266, n=16) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (4370 - 7269, n=16) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (14104 - 28019, n=16) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (30391 - 99244, n=16) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (420 - 807, n=16) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (2906 - 5957, n=16) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (29108 - 49328, n=16) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
System Performance
The PCMark 10 benchmark gives a good impression of the laptop's behavior in everyday operation. The distance to the Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro and Huawei MateBook X Pro, which both also use the i7-1360P processor, turns out extremely small here. The limited power consumption doesn't have much of an influence when surfing the Internet, making video calls, or running Office programs.
When the fan performance is reduced in the LG Smart Assistant, the values drop by about 10%. However, selecting the passive mode has a significantly larger effect, since the processor can than only use 8 watts constantly, instead of 28 watts. The values then drop to the level of an Apple MacBook Air or Acer Swift 3 SF314 from 2019.
Even though the lower performance is very noticeable, it only has a minimal effect while surfing, reading text documents, creating a spreadsheet, or performing similar tasks. This means that you can use the Gram Style with completely deactivated fans in many situations, and it will continue to perform everyday tasks smoothly, comparable to a good but four-year-old laptop.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5360 - 6281, n=14) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Apple Macbook Air 2019 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9883 - 12059, n=14) | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Apple Macbook Air 2019 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6572 - 8161, n=14) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Apple Macbook Air 2019 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5723 - 7612, n=14) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Apple Macbook Air 2019 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1527 - 1891, n=15) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1503 - 1842, n=15) | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1558 - 2003, n=15) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1311 - 1899, n=15) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5621 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (44299 - 72748, n=16) | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (44751 - 68945, n=16) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (45887 - 93331, n=16) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1360P (85 - 110.5, n=16) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies
At least compared to our competing subnotebooks, the LG Gram Style fares okay in the latencies. However, with particularly demanding tasks such as real-time audio processing, you should expect some stutters. But admittedly, the Gram isn't even designed for this. In addition, some driver updates or new software might also change the result significantly.
When streaming a 4K video with YouTube, there was exactly a single dropped frame. While this is not a perfect result, it is decent for the hardware. However, at almost 30%, the iGPU load turns out very high.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| HP Dragonfly G4 | |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Solution
The system SSD delivers the expected results across several tests and disciplines that should be achieved using a PCIe 4.0 connection. The second, identical SSD performs at the same level.
What is less convincing, is the behavior in the constant load test. The SSD and its controller get too hot and throttle the transfer rates. While this should be hardly, if at all, noticeable in practice, the cooling capabilities definitely hit their limits here.
