Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs Intel Core i7-7820HK

Intel Core i7-1065G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1065G7

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC of the Ice Lake U product family designed for thin laptops and Ultrabooks. It was announced in May 2019 (Computex). The CPU has four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading) clocked at 1.3 (base) - 3.9 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.8 GHz and all four 3.5 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock).

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The biggest improvement of Ice Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics adapter called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 EUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU from current Ryzen APUs.

Performance

The average 1065G7 in our database is most comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U and the Intel Core i5-8259U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a so-so result and a direct consequence of Intel's inability to make the best of its brand-new 10 nm node. The Core i7-10710U, a 10th generation processor built with an older 14 nm process, will easily rip a 1065G7 to pieces. That said, the 1065G7 will surely beat a 10710U in terms of energy efficiency.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 1065G7 that we know of. It can be around 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The quad-core Intel CPU is built with Intel's second-gen 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-7820HK

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7820HK

The Intel Core i7-7820HK is a fast quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the second fastest model of the consumer series at the time of the announcement. Only the i7-7920HQ and Xeon E3-1535M v6 are faster. Besides four cores including Hyper-Threading support running at 2.9 - 3.9 GHz (4 cores up to 3.5 GHz, 2 cores up to 3.7 GHz), the processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to the Core i7-7820HQ, the 7820HK lacks business features like vPro or TXT support.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Due to the higher clock speeds, the performance of the i7-7820HK is slightly faster than the old Skylake top model Core i7-6920HQ (2.9 - 3.8 GHz). The performance is sufficient even for very demanding tasks and on par with powerful desktop quad-core processors.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1100 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

ModelIntel Core i7-1065G7Intel Core i7-7820HK
SeriesIntel Ice LakeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameIce Lake-UKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Core i5-1038NG7 compare2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G7 « 1.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G7 compare1.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G4 compare1.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G1 compare1 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G1 compare1.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK « 2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock1300 - 3900 MHz2900 - 3900 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1526
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
$378 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1065G7
29.8 pt (41%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3127     avg: 3615     median: 3437 (3%)     max: 4281 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1050     avg: 1131     median: 1131 (48%)     max: 1212 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 358     avg: 438.1     median: 449 (50%)     max: 474 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1081     avg: 1510     median: 1543 (4%)     max: 2024 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 288     avg: 648     median: 662.5 (4%)     max: 836 Points
min: 689     avg: 773     median: 770 (5%)     max: 867 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 141     avg: 174.2     median: 178.1 (54%)     max: 190 Points
min: 156     avg: 162.7     median: 162 (49%)     max: 171 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.69     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (9%)     max: 9.37 Points
min: 8.34     avg: 8.6     median: 8.4 (11%)     max: 9.53 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.09     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (52%)     max: 2.17 Points
min: 1.69     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (46%)     max: 1.85 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7083     avg: 7254     median: 7270.5 (44%)     max: 7390 Points
min: 6062     avg: 6231     median: 6182 (37%)     max: 6566 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16551     avg: 21959     median: 22401.5 (16%)     max: 26481 Points
min: 22793     avg: 23622     median: 23046.5 (17%)     max: 26081 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 32769     avg: 34129.5     median: 34129.5 (24%)     max: 35490 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 8465     avg: 8558.5     median: 8558.5 (10%)     max: 8652 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 232.9     avg: 281     median: 255.6 (3%)     max: 354.4 s
min: 179.4     avg: 234.7     median: 214.3 (3%)     max: 330.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.969     avg: 8     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 9.186 s
min: 6.668     avg: 10.4     median: 8.6 (2%)     max: 17.8 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
215.4 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
17.8 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4908     avg: 4953     median: 4956 (8%)     max: 4995 Points
min: 5114     avg: 5135     median: 5134.5 (8%)     max: 5155 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 10406     avg: 17024     median: 17254.5 (10%)     max: 22898 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3289     avg: 4284     median: 4393 (53%)     max: 4589 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 40.6     avg: 45.1     median: 45.1 (16%)     max: 49.5 fps
min: 46     avg: 46.9     median: 46.9 (16%)     max: 47.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 175.5     avg: 184.9     median: 184.9 (43%)     max: 194.3 fps
min: 177     avg: 178.8     median: 178.8 (41%)     max: 180.6 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 2.2     avg: 4.6     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 6.38 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.449     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.459 GB/s
min: 0.416     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.609 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.79 GB/s
min: 0.71     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.831 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (13%)     max: 5 GB/s
min: 3.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (11%)     max: 4.3 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 675     avg: 882     median: 836 (6%)     max: 1650 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.661     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.798 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9122     avg: 9209     median: 9208.5 (20%)     max: 9295 Points
min: 7957     avg: 8098     median: 8038 (17%)     max: 8360 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.64     avg: 11.7     median: 11.7 (3%)     max: 14.72 s
min: 9     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (2%)     max: 10.5 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.92     avg: 23.2     median: 23.2 (1%)     max: 27.42 s
min: 20.67     avg: 21.7     median: 21.5 (1%)     max: 23.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 431     avg: 481     median: 481 (2%)     max: 531 s
min: 490.5     avg: 529     median: 535 (2%)     max: 550 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
26223 Points (23%)
30280 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3401     avg: 8138     median: 8479.5 (23%)     max: 10494 Points
min: 9542     avg: 10034     median: 10019 (27%)     max: 10523 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 29124     avg: 49182     median: 52060.5 (42%)     max: 54876 Points
min: 51307     avg: 53563     median: 52699.5 (43%)     max: 59600 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 29190     avg: 46812     median: 48876 (40%)     max: 54424 Points
min: 50796     avg: 53623     median: 52515.5 (43%)     max: 59482 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 52974     avg: 57448     median: 57798 (49%)     max: 60169 Points
min: 51327     avg: 54058     median: 52784.5 (44%)     max: 60127 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5065     avg: 7011     median: 7365 (19%)     max: 8472 Points
min: 7905     avg: 8141     median: 8001.5 (20%)     max: 9050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2752     avg: 9928     median: 10445 (19%)     max: 12021 Points
min: 11041     avg: 11381     median: 11174 (20%)     max: 12592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2273     avg: 3365     median: 3523 (15%)     max: 4435 Points
min: 4259     avg: 4439     median: 4447 (19%)     max: 4568 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 948     avg: 1274     median: 1316 (56%)     max: 1348 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2464     avg: 4215     median: 4406.5 (8%)     max: 4855 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1184     avg: 1295     median: 1310 (6%)     max: 1334 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3375     avg: 4436     median: 4648 (15%)     max: 4839 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5239     avg: 5587     median: 5637.5 (56%)     max: 5771 Points
min: 4841     avg: 4897     median: 4896.5 (49%)     max: 4952 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14557     avg: 17869     median: 18459.5 (20%)     max: 18849 Points
min: 15838     avg: 16002     median: 16001.5 (18%)     max: 16165 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5752 Points (78%)
min: 4867     avg: 4905     median: 4904.5 (67%)     max: 4942 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
18772 Points (46%)
min: 15042     avg: 15309     median: 15308.5 (37%)     max: 15575 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
14396 Points (26%)
min: 14323     avg: 15088     median: 14476 (26%)     max: 16465 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3863 Points (75%)
min: 3718     avg: 4002     median: 3926 (77%)     max: 4361 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
14990 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3885 Points (58%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 788     avg: 912     median: 861.5 (1%)     max: 1249 ms
min: 901     avg: 2277     median: 984 (1%)     max: 7545 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
88.9 ms (1%)
min: 68.3     avg: 138.2     median: 71.1 (1%)     max: 400.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25166     avg: 37201     median: 36670 (33%)     max: 53081 Points
min: 35189     avg: 38766     median: 39000 (35%)     max: 40652 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 130     avg: 199.4     median: 201.5 (42%)     max: 216 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1025 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 23.4     avg: 30.5     median: 26 (4%)     max: 48.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.1     avg: 34.8     median: 34.5 (6%)     max: 48.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.5     avg: 19.1     median: 19.3 (14%)     max: 25.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1065G7 → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7820HK → 100% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 11:26:33

#0 checking url part for id 11399 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8415 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.043s ... 0.044s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11399 +0.021s ... 0.065s

#7 got single benchmarks 11399 +0.134s ... 0.199s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8415 +0.005s ... 0.204s

#9 got single benchmarks 8415 +0.064s ... 0.268s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.268s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.078s ... 0.346s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.35s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.116s ... 0.466s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.179s ... 0.645s

#15 return log +0.058s ... 0.704s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)