Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10210U vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600H vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900H

Intel Core i5-10210U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10210U

The Intel Core i5-10210U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i5-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (up to LPDDR4-2933 vs DDR4-2400) and two additional cores in the top model (not in this i5). The processor cores are clocked between 1.6 and 4.2 GHz (all 4 cores 3.9 GHz max). Thanks to Hyper-Threading 8 threads can be used. Compared to the faster i5-10510U, the level 3 cache was reduced from 8 to 6 MB. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The integrated graphics adapter however is still the same as in the previous generations. It's still called Intel UHD Graphics 620 and clocked from 300 - 1100 MHz in the i5. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder.

Performance

The average 10210U in our database is just as fast as the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, the Intel Core i7-8565U and the Intel Core i5-1035G1 are, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. While the i5 is not a performance monster, it sails through basic day-to-day workloads with little effort.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of 30 W, the Frost Canyon NUC (NUC10i5FNK) is among the fastest systems powered by the 10210U that we know of. It can be more than twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. By going for the lowest value, it is possible to build a passively cooled system around the i5. Please note that Comet Lake-U processors can briefly consume as much as 80 W or even 90 W when under heavy loads.

The Core i5-10210U is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for very low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

► remove from comparison AMD R5 4600H

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600H is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4600H integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads).

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics adapter with 6 CUs and up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4600H in our database matches the Intel Core i7-10875H and even the Core i9-10885H, both significantly more costly chips, in multi-thread performance, giving this Ryzen an outrageously high price-to-performance ratio.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 5 chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 35 W and 54 W with clock speed and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, a high-performance cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The 7 nm TSMC process this APU is built with makes for better-than-average, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 4900H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 4900H

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900H is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. At the time of announcement in March 2020 it is the fastest model of the 4000H series. The R9 4900H integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to  4.4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips

According to our information, the Ryzen 9 4900H is only slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 4800H. The CPU is clocked 400 MHz (base +14%) to 200 MHz (boost +5%) higher, but the gains greatly depend on the cooling and TDP settings. Compared to Intel chips, the i9-9980HK top model should be comparable. That means the Ryzen 9 4900H should be able to handle all demanding tasks and gaming.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 12 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 45 Watt (default). That means the chip is intended for big and relatively heavy laptops.

ModelIntel Core i5-10210UAMD Ryzen 5 4600HAMD Ryzen 9 4900H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
CodenameComet Lake-URenoir-H (Zen 2)Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U « 1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H « 3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H « 3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Clock1600 - 4200 MHz3000 - 4000 MHz3300 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1 MB3 MB4 MB
L3 Cache6 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 128 / 16
TDP15 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1528FP6FP6
FeaturesLPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10210U
28.7 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 4600H
32.4 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900H
35.4 pt (49%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
69 Points (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
499 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1794     avg: 3321     median: 3794 (4%)     max: 4376 Points
min: 7713     avg: 8161     median: 8072 (7%)     max: 8786 Points
min: 11416     avg: 11604     median: 11604 (11%)     max: 11792 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 797     avg: 974     median: 1062 (45%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 1134     avg: 1145     median: 1142.5 (49%)     max: 1161 Points
min: 1290     avg: 1294     median: 1294 (55%)     max: 1298 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 322     avg: 406.8     median: 415 (46%)     max: 428 Points
min: 428     avg: 445.3     median: 449.5 (50%)     max: 454 Points
min: 482     avg: 493.5     median: 493.5 (55%)     max: 505 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 722     avg: 1279     median: 1242 (3%)     max: 1820 Points
min: 3055     avg: 3233     median: 3229.5 (8%)     max: 3393 Points
min: 4233     avg: 4409     median: 4409 (11%)     max: 4585 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 320     avg: 609     median: 616 (4%)     max: 790 Points
min: 1398     avg: 1428     median: 1425 (9%)     max: 1467 Points
min: 1886     avg: 1927     median: 1926.5 (12%)     max: 1967 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 134     avg: 165.6     median: 166 (50%)     max: 174 Points
min: 172.1     avg: 176.5     median: 176 (53%)     max: 179 Points
min: 192     avg: 193     median: 193 (58%)     max: 194 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.69     avg: 7.3     median: 7.5 (10%)     max: 8.66 Points
16.3 Points (21%)
23 Points (30%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.71     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (47%)     max: 1.91 Points
2 Points (51%)
2.2 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6410     avg: 6478     median: 6412 (39%)     max: 6613 Points
5365 Points (32%)
5946 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 15037     avg: 17758     median: 16072 (12%)     max: 22164 Points
32756 Points (24%)
40253 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
65380 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10173 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
217.8 s (3%)
82.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.8 s (1%)
3.2 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
398 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
11.3 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4213 Points (7%)
4380 Points (7%)
4297 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 10920     avg: 16808     median: 16742 (10%)     max: 21679 MIPS
min: 36693     avg: 37768     median: 37642.5 (22%)     max: 38873 MIPS
48976 MIPS (28%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3504     avg: 4205     median: 4261 (51%)     max: 4467 MIPS
min: 4334     avg: 4395     median: 4397 (53%)     max: 4471 MIPS
4727 MIPS (57%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 33.41     avg: 42.2     median: 43.9 (15%)     max: 49.35 fps
82.9 fps (29%)
111 fps (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 149.1     avg: 167.7     median: 169.5 (39%)     max: 184.5 fps
197 fps (45%)
215 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 2.36     avg: 4.3     median: 4.3 (8%)     max: 6.28 fps
min: 9.27     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (17%)     max: 10.4 fps
12.9 fps (23%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.48     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.491 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.79     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (14%)     max: 0.802 GB/s
1.4 GB/s (24%)
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.6     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (12%)     max: 4.7 GB/s
5 GB/s (13%)
7.4 GB/s (19%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
631 Seconds (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 585     avg: 859     median: 829 (6%)     max: 1339 Seconds
min: 337.2     avg: 351.9     median: 352 (2%)     max: 369 Seconds
247.3 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.658     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.901 sec
min: 0.607     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.627 sec
0.6 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 6167     avg: 6403     median: 6363 (14%)     max: 6680 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.913     avg: 9     median: 9 (2%)     max: 9.008 s
10.5 s (2%)
9.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 20.35     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (1%)     max: 20.86 s
24.1 s (1%)
24.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 509     avg: 517     median: 516.5 (2%)     max: 524 s
607 s (3%)
729 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
64532 Points (57%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3843     avg: 6632     median: 6720 (18%)     max: 9364 Points
min: 10904     avg: 11680     median: 11593.5 (31%)     max: 12640 Points
12199 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 40123     avg: 48009     median: 49630 (40%)     max: 54173 Points
63266 Points (51%)
63416 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 47281     avg: 55148     median: 56586 (48%)     max: 60555 Points
min: 61439     avg: 63513     median: 63779 (54%)     max: 65322 Points
69343 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4495     avg: 6154     median: 5973.5 (15%)     max: 8574 Points
min: 10548     avg: 11100     median: 11085.5 (28%)     max: 11681 Points
15719 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 381     avg: 8610     median: 8567 (15%)     max: 11875 Points
min: 17769     avg: 18050     median: 18021.5 (32%)     max: 18378 Points
20613 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1983     avg: 2749     median: 2734.5 (12%)     max: 3997 Points
min: 5496     avg: 6170     median: 6251 (26%)     max: 6792 Points
6523 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 6943     avg: 7132     median: 7131.5 (28%)     max: 7320 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
6885 Points (79%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1525 Points (42%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
6631 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 949     avg: 1071     median: 1079 (46%)     max: 1133 Points
min: 1099     avg: 1115     median: 1117 (47%)     max: 1124 Points
min: 1230     avg: 1232     median: 1231.5 (52%)     max: 1233 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2079     avg: 3570     median: 3689 (7%)     max: 4256 Points
min: 5260     avg: 6057     median: 6080 (11%)     max: 6574 Points
min: 7224     avg: 8012     median: 8012 (14%)     max: 8800 Points
1237 Points (5%)
7624 Points (24%)
4964 Points (50%)
5287 Points (53%)
25247 Points (28%)
28402 Points (31%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4892 Points (67%)
4605 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
15199 Points (37%)
20939 Points (51%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11855     avg: 12114     median: 12114 (21%)     max: 12373 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3429     avg: 3457     median: 3457 (68%)     max: 3485 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
15805 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4278 Points (64%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 886     avg: 1014     median: 966 (1%)     max: 1267 ms
min: 844     avg: 849     median: 848.5 (1%)     max: 855 ms
767 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 239.4     avg: 245.5     median: 245.5 (3%)     max: 251.5 ms
min: 46066     avg: 47138     median: 47137.5 (42%)     max: 48209 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 169     avg: 190.8     median: 191 (40%)     max: 203 Points
min: 198     avg: 206     median: 207 (43%)     max: 212 Points
227 Points (47%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
4130 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 8069     avg: 8091     median: 8090.5 (43%)     max: 8112 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 26840     avg: 32009     median: 32009 (68%)     max: 37178 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 12155     avg: 12335     median: 12334.5 (81%)     max: 12514 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 17751     avg: 18155     median: 18155 (91%)     max: 18559 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1061 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17.1     avg: 30.6     median: 27.9 (5%)     max: 58.5 Watt
66.4 Watt (11%)
73.2 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17.7     avg: 27.3     median: 28.1 (5%)     max: 37.5 Watt
66.4 Watt (12%)
105.3 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.8     avg: 20.8     median: 17.3 (13%)     max: 35.8 Points per Watt
21.1 Points per Watt (16%)
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10210U → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4600H → 149% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900H → 182% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 17. 13:25:45

#0 checking url part for id 11459 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11679 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11929 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.039s ... 0.04s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11459 +0.016s ... 0.057s

#8 got single benchmarks 11459 +0.142s ... 0.199s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11679 +0.016s ... 0.215s

#10 got single benchmarks 11679 +0.043s ... 0.258s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11929 +0.016s ... 0.274s

#12 got single benchmarks 11929 +0.011s ... 0.285s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.285s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.492s ... 0.777s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.777s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)