Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G610 MP6

ARM Mali-G610 MP6

The ARM Mali-G610 MP6 or MC6 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for smartphones with 6 cores. It is based on the second generation of the Valhall architecture and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and Vulkan 1.2.

Mali-G610 Series

Mali-G610 MP6 6
Mali-G610 MP4 compare 6
Mali-G610 MP3 compare 3
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines6 - unified
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
Man. Technology4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement25.05.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G610 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 81008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 82008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 620     avg: 623     median: 624 (1%)     max: 625 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3406     avg: 5710     median: 6217.5 (3%)     max: 6439 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1152     avg: 1545     median: 1685.5 (2%)     max: 1693 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 9387     avg: 10150     median: 10117 (44%)     max: 10945 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 13699     avg: 14212     median: 13972 (31%)     max: 14966 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 7875     avg: 8436     median: 8462 (36%)     max: 8946 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 9738     avg: 10142     median: 9998 (25%)     max: 10832 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
7890 Points (39%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
9814 Points (33%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 12.7     median: 12.5 (5%)     max: 14 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 12     avg: 27.7     median: 27 (5%)     max: 45 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68.3     median: 68 (5%)     max: 77 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 51     avg: 57.7     median: 57 (5%)     max: 64 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 95     avg: 102.7     median: 99 (2%)     max: 119 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 108     avg: 144.5     median: 145.5 (6%)     max: 170 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 262     avg: 276     median: 273 (2%)     max: 294 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 228679     avg: 290638     median: 310398 (31%)     max: 313078 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 228734     avg: 233369     median: 233369 (16%)     max: 238004 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 76.73     avg: 88.5     median: 90.4 (2%)     max: 98.34 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 3342     avg: 3775     median: 3775 (1%)     max: 4208 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 3650     avg: 4167     median: 4166.5 (1%)     max: 4683 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 28220     avg: 31469     median: 31469 (11%)     max: 34718 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 31916     avg: 44435     median: 44434.5 (59%)     max: 56953 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.65     avg: 6.8     median: 6 (2%)     max: 8.69 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
med.
34.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
57.4 59 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
60 120 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
50.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 40 59 60 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
39.1 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
58.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
59.2 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
60 119 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal60
Genshin Impact34.858
Armajet90
PUBG Mobile6050.94740
Asphalt 9: Legends58.360
Subway Surfers90
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2

2


1
3

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 12. 12:33:26

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Mar 2026 11:04:42 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.019s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11370 +0.015s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 11370 +0.039s ... 0.072s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#10 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.276s ... 0.348s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.024s ... 0.372s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.527s ... 0.899s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.899s

#14 Got 20 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.904s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.904s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.907s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.059s ... 0.966s

#18 return log +0.126s ... 1.091s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G610 MP6 graphics card

Oukitel WP210 im Test

Sounds like every outdoor enthusiast's dream – Oukitel WP210 smartphone review

The Oukitel WP210 is designed to be both attractive and robust. It also features a fast processor, is intended to have a long battery life and takes decent photos. Are these exaggerated claims, or does this outdoor mobile phone really deliver?
MediaTek Dimensity 8200, ARM Mali-G610 MP6, 6.7", 311 g
Oukitel WP200 Pro review

Oukitel WP200 Pro smartphone review – The outdoor phone with crazy features and huge storage

Oukitel has some unusual ideas: The WP200 Pro has a rear display that transforms into a TWS headset or smartwatch. Adding to this is 1 TByte of mass storage and a huge battery. Is this madness or mad genius?
MediaTek Dimensity 8200, ARM Mali-G610 MP6, 6.7", 311 g
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G smartphone review - Lots of megapixels, lots of performance

Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G smartphone review - Lots of megapixels, lots of performance

Tecno's main aim with the Camon 30 Premier 5G is to score points with good camera performance. But the rest of the features are also impressive: up-to-date processor, plenty of storage space, 120 Hz LTPO AMOLED display. We took a close look at this exotic device.
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, ARM Mali-G610 MP6, 6.77", 215 g
Xiaomi 13T

Xiaomi 13T Smartphone in review - The budget alternative to the Xiaomi 13

If the Xiaomi 13 proves to be too expensive for your budget, consider exploring the more affordable Xiaomi 13T. It is similarly well-equipped and closely rivals the flagship in terms of performance. With a 6.67-inch display, the device features a remarkably bright AMOLED screen with a 144 Hz refresh rate, complemented by a triple camera system enhanced by Leica, featuring 2x optical zoom. Additionally, the Xiaomi 13T offers an impressive 5-year update support.
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, ARM Mali-G610 MP6, 6.67", 197 g
Xiaomi 12T 5G review - Top of the range smartphone at an attractive price

Xiaomi 12T 5G review - Top of the range smartphone at an attractive price

In our review, the Xiaomi 12T attempts to turn heads with its newer SoC, a redesigned triple-camera system. Similar to the pro model, it can also be charged with up to 120 watts - and all without greatly affecting the price. Read on as our review uncovers whether these improvements warrant a switch from your current handset.
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, ARM Mali-G610 MP6, 6.67", 202 g

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Poco X4 GT smartphone review - Affordable high-performance phone with 144 Hz display

Realme GT Neo 3: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » realme GT Neo 3 review: Innovative smartphone with fast charging technology

Oukitel WP210: MediaTek Dimensity 8200, 6.70", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Oukitel WP210

Oukitel WP200 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 8200, 6.70", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Oukitel WP200 Pro

Unihertz (8849) Tank Pad: MediaTek Dimensity 8200, 10.95", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Unihertz (8849) Tank Pad

Cubot Kingkong X Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 6.72", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Cubot Kingkong X Pro

Cubot KingKong Star 2: MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 6.72", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Cubot KingKong Star 2

Infinix Zero 40 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Zero 40 5G

Cubot Max 5: unknown, 6.95", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot Max 5

Unihertz Tank 3S: unknown, 6.79", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Unihertz Tank 3S

Infinix GT 20 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix GT 20 Pro

Unihertz Tank 3 Pro (8849): unknown, 6.79", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Unihertz Tank 3 Pro (8849)

Vivo Y100t: unknown, 6.64", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y100t

Vivo V30 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V30 Pro

Oppo Reno11: MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno11

Vivo V29 Pro: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V29 Pro

Xiaomi 13T: MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 13T

Vivo iQOO Z8: unknown, 6.64", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z8

Vivo S17 Pro: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S17 Pro

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro: unknown, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro

Xiaomi Civi 3: unknown, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Civi 3

Vivo V27: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V27

Vivo V27 Pro: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V27 Pro

Honor Pad V8 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 12.10", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Honor Pad V8 Pro

Xiaomi Redmi K60E: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K60E

Oppo Reno9 Pro: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno9 Pro

Xiaomi 12T: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 12T

Motorola Edge 2022: unknown, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 2022

Xiaomi Redmi K50i: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K50i

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco X4 GT

Oppo Reno8 Pro: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno8 Pro

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro Plus: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro Plus

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro

Vivo S15 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S15 Pro

Oppo Reno8 Pro+: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno8 Pro+

Honor 70 Pro: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 70 Pro

Realme GT Neo 3: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme GT Neo 3

Realme GT Neo3 Naruto Edition: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme GT Neo3

Oukitel WP210: MediaTek Dimensity 8200, 6.70", 0.3 kg
   » OLED display or IPS screen: What makes more sense for outdoor phones?

Xiaomi 13T: MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi 13T under review: 6.67-inch smartphone with powerful features and upper-class ambitions

Motorola Edge 2022: unknown, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Edge (2022) smartphone with 144Hz OLED display and big 5,000 mAh battery drops to lowest price ever on Amazon

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Poco X4 GT: Powerful budget smartphone for gaming and entertainment

Realme GT Neo 3: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » This phone is a dream for Genshin Impact players

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
UHD Graphics 730
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
A19 4-Core GPU *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP8 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 920 *
Maleoon 920A *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)