Oukitel WP200 Pro smartphone review – The outdoor phone with crazy features and huge storage
Nothing is impossible.
Oukitel has some unusual ideas: The WP200 Pro has a rear display that transforms into a TWS headset or smartwatch. Adding to this is 1 TByte of mass storage and a huge battery. Is this madness or mad genius?Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Verdict on the Oukitel WP200 Pro
The Oukitel WP200 Pro is something truly special: Other phones already have an integrated secondary display that allows you to operate the phone from the back. But what's new about this model is the fact that it also functions as a headset or smartwatch. This is a good idea and the smartwatch mode in particular features a surprisingly wide range of functions. One disadvantage, however, is that the hollow part on the back of the smartphone remains empty when used permanently as a smartwatch, which doesn't exactly look pretty.
The phone isn't that heavy, but it is much bulkier than conventional cell phones. You don't have to worry about damage, as the phone is protected against water and dust and can also withstand being dropped.
Its SoC is fast, its battery life is excellent and its speaker can get reasonably loud if desired. We would wish for more brightness on its AMOLED screen—especially for an outdoor phone. You'll also have to live with a slight blue cast and PWM flickering.
If you are prepared to spend over $600 on the rugged phone, then the Oukitel WP200 Pro is a reliable, stable and stylish companion that won't give you any storage problems any time soon. Whether you use the integrated second display, which also functions as a headset and smartwatch, is up to you. It is definitely a unique feature and an eye-catcher.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
You can purchase the Oukitel WP200 Pro directly from the manufacturer for $699.99.
Table of Contents
- Verdict on the Oukitel WP200 Pro
- Specifications
- Case and connectivity – An aluminum frame on the well-protected case
- Communication and operation – Unique second display
- Software and sustainability
- Cameras – Decent main camera
- Display – The AMOLED screen isn't quite so bright
- Performance, emissions and battery life – Good power
- Notebookcheck total rating
Specifications
Case and connectivity – An aluminum frame on the well-protected case
The WP200 Pro has an aluminum frame with a brushed look but a smooth feel. Its screen is protected by Gorilla Glass 5, while the back is made of plastic with a stylish diamond pattern. Its design is generally quite understated, so the rugged phone not only looks good outdoors, but also at more formal events. Blue, green and black are available as color options.
The stability of its case is great and it has been built very well. However, at 311 grams, its weight is significantly higher than that of conventional smartphones. The phone's case is protected against water and dust in accordance with IP69K.
The manufacturer has installed a gigantic 24 GB of RAM and 1 TB of UFS 4.0 mass storage. So if you need a lot of space for your data and want to use multiple apps at the same time, this is the perfect choice for you. It isn't possible to expand its storage with microSD cards, nor does the device support eSIMs.
NFC for wireless payment is on board.
Communication and operation – Unique second display
The Oukitel WP200 Pro comes with WiFi 6 but doesn't have access to the 6 GHz band, which is currently still not used as much and therefore promises higher speeds. Nevertheless, the phone achieved good download speeds of up to 994 MBit/s in our Wi-Fi test using the Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000.
A wide range of LTE and 5G networks are available, so you can use the phone on lots of cell phone networks worldwide.
A fingerprint sensor is located behind its screen. It recognizes saved prints very quickly and reliably. The system is then unlocked without any noticeable delay. There is an additional hardware button on the left-hand side of the case, which launches the Google Gemini voice assistant and otherwise can't be freely assigned.
The phone's second display on the back is very unusual, which shows the time, music playback control or even messages. However, it can also be removed and used as earphones. This works without any problems and the sound is decent, but the headset is only for one ear it doesn't feature any noise canceling. The external display is permanently active and shows notifications, which may not always be desirable. Still, the earphones are a good emergency solution if you don't have another headset on hand.
But that's not all: if you insert the external display into the supplied wristband, you can also use it as a smartwatch. Its range of functions is not bad at all: activity and sleep monitoring, heart rate, blood oxygen, weather, remote shutter release for the camera and much more. Only its battery life could be a little longer, but the watch lasts for a full day.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (305 - 1757, n=142) | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | |
| Average of class Tablet (10.5 - 1656, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| CAT S75 | |
| Doogee Fire 6 | |
| Nokia XR21 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (234 - 1696, n=140) | |
| Average of class Tablet (20.1 - 1705, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia XR21 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| Doogee Fire 6 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Tablet (578 - 1888, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (417 - 1902, n=22) | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Tablet (746 - 1842, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (743 - 1816, n=22) | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
Software and sustainability
Android 15 comes pre-installed on the device. The system is very close to stock Android and there are no sponsored apps pre-installed.
At the time of testing, the latest security updates were from December 2024, so they're already outdated. The manufacturer hasn't revealed how often and for how long the phone will be supplied with updates.
The device is wrapped in a plastic film inside a large package and there is no available data on the materials used or the WP200 Pro's CO2 footprint. The manufacturer is also not taking any other visible measures to achieve greater sustainability.
Cameras – Decent main camera
The phone's main camera has a resolution of 108 megapixels, and it also features a macro lens with a very low resolution as well as a supporting lens for depth of field. The main camera takes perfectly decent photos in good lighting conditions, but colors appear oversaturated and fine details are blurred.
The dynamic range in darker settings is okay, but details are no longer visible in very bright and very dark areas. Users can record video in a maximum resolution of 4K and at 30 fps per second. The autofocus works quickly but isn't always invisible. Exposure compensation works very quickly.
The front camera has a resolution of 32 megapixels and takes decent selfies with some details. However, hardly anything is recognizable in darker areas.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light
Display – The AMOLED screen isn't quite so bright
Oukitel has equipped its phone with an AMOLED screen with an extended Full HD resolution. However, its maximum brightness of around 516 cd/m² is only average and too low for an outdoor phone, as it is difficult to read the display in very bright environments.
A slight blue cast can also be seen in its color display, making its overall picture appear somewhat cooler than in reality.
The PWM flickering at 121 Hz at low brightness which we measured could bother sensitive users.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 512 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
147.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.241
| Oukitel WP200 Pro AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7" | Doogee Fire 6 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Motorola ThinkPhone 25 p-OLED, 2670x1220, 6.4" | Nokia XR21 TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.5" | CAT S75 IPS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -38% | 63% | 15% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle | 512 | 435 -15% | 1125 120% | 503 -2% | 566 11% |
| Brightness | 511 | 429 -16% | 1109 117% | 487 -5% | 529 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 93 -5% | 97 -1% | 94 -4% | 83 -15% |
| Black Level * | 0.52 | 0.45 | 0.47 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.01 | 7 -40% | 1.95 61% | 2.4 52% | 5.02 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.93 | 12.1 -75% | 3.37 51% | 6.6 5% | 9.6 -39% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 6.2 -77% | 2.4 31% | 1.9 46% | 4.4 -26% |
| Gamma | 2.241 98% | 2.86 77% | 2.099 105% | 2.22 99% | 2.248 98% |
| CCT | 7137 91% | 7407 88% | 6336 103% | 6602 98% | 7173 91% |
| Contrast | 837 | 1118 | 1204 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 121 Hz Amplitude: 16 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 121 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 121 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). | ||
Performance, emissions and battery life – Good power
The Oukitel WP200 Pro is powered by a MediaTek Dimensity 8200, which delivered decent performance values during our test. It can run several apps simultaneously or more complex applications.
The manufacturer has gone for UFS 4.0 storage, but the sequential data rates we measured were quite low.
Under high load, the phone's case heats up considerably. We also noted slight throttling after prolonged use with a lot of power.
Although its mono speaker can get quite loud, it sounds very treble-heavy. A wide range of codecs is available for wireless audio transmission.
Its battery has a capacity of 8,800 mAh. The device lasted for 25:44 hours in our Wi-Fi test, which means you only have to charge it every few days during normal use, and it can survive longer trips away from power sockets. A full charge takes around 4:30 hours.
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (3195 - 25683, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia XR21 | |
| Doogee Fire 6 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200 (n=1) | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia XR21 | |
| CAT S75 | |
| Doogee Fire 6 | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
| Average of class Tablet (85 - 1140, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Doogee Fire 6 | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
| Average of class Tablet (84 - 4545, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Doogee Fire 6 | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
| Average of class Tablet (130 - 4532, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Doogee Fire 6 | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | Doogee Fire 6 | Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | Nokia XR21 | CAT S75 | Average 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -24% | -18% | -54% | -25% | 127% | -20% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 997.7 | 976.73 -2% | 975.43 -2% | 509.76 -49% | 991.21 -1% | 3434 ? 244% | 1253 ? 26% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 936.4 | 883.37 -6% | 856.48 -9% | 465.31 -50% | 878.23 -6% | 3229 ? 245% | 882 ? -6% |
| Random Read 4KB | 368.5 | 203.11 -45% | 287.4 -22% | 187.51 -49% | 221.56 -40% | 389 ? 6% | 206 ? -44% |
| Random Write 4KB | 494.1 | 286.2 -42% | 308.11 -38% | 167.51 -66% | 233.91 -53% | 550 ? 11% | 212 ? -57% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Nokia XR21 | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
| Doogee Fire 6 | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
| Nokia XR21 | |
| Oukitel WP200 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola ThinkPhone 25 | |
Oukitel WP200 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
CAT S75 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Oukitel WP200 Pro 8800 mAh | Doogee Fire 6 10400 mAh | Motorola ThinkPhone 25 4310 mAh | Nokia XR21 4800 mAh | CAT S75 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 29% | -44% | -43% | -42% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1544 | 1993 29% | 859 -44% | 875 -43% | 896 -42% |
| Reader / Idle | 1711 | 2344 | |||
| H.264 | 1604 | 1085 | |||
| Load | 204 | 400 |
Notebookcheck total rating
The Oukitel WP200 Pro is an unusual smartphone with a very flexible secondary display.
Its performance and battery life are impressive, but you'll have to accept some compromises when it comes to its weight and size.
Oukitel WP200 Pro
- 03/25/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 80%  | Oukitel WP200 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8200 ⎘ ARM Mali-G610 MP6 ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: $899.99 List Price: 645€ | 311 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 2412x1080 394 PPI AMOLED |
2. 67.7%  | Doogee Fire 6 Unisoc T7200 (T606) ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $8.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $9.91 NEOYUKL Tempered Glass for D... 3. $11.89 TNKISRY Tempered Glass for D... List Price: 400€ | 348 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.56" 1612x720 269 PPI IPS |
3. 79.2%  | Motorola ThinkPhone 25 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $7.82 Pusiikeer 2 Pack for Motorol... 3. $8.60 Zeking (2 Set) for Motorola ... List Price: 499€ | 171 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.36" 2670x1220 462 PPI p-OLED |
4. 82.3% v7 (old)  | Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design... 2. $9.98 5FT USB-C Wall Charger Charg... 3. $13.99 6.6FT USB C Charger Cable fo... List Price: 599€ | 231 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.49" 2400x1080 406 PPI TFT-LCD |
5. 79.7% v7 (old)  | CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.49 LSSBUUD USB C Cat Phone Fast... 2. $11.99 LIAUBN Cell Phone Charger Ca... 3. $38.99 SECRETIGER LCD Screen Displa... List Price: 599€ | 268 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.58" 2408x1080 401 PPI IPS LCD |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
