Notebookcheck

Oukitel WP1 Smartphone Review

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (translated by Stanislav Kokhanyuk), 01/05/2019

Robust. The Oukitel WP1 is a mid-range smartphone designed for the great outdoors. The Oukitel smartphone surprises with its 150-Euro ($171) price tag, given the kind of hardware it brings to the table. The Oukitel WP1 is also water-proof and very robust.

Oukitel WP1

The WP product line from the Shenzhen-based manufacturer consists of mid-range smartphones that are especially good in the great outdoors. This is why the Oukitel WP1 offers a massive, drop-proof case, which has an IP68-certification, meaning that it is both water- and dust-resistant.

The smartphone is powered by an octa-core SoC from MediaTek and has 4 GB of RAM. There is a 13+2 MP dual-camera system on the back of the smartphone. The built-in IPS panel has an HD resolution and measures 5.45 inches diagonally. It features a 2:1 aspect ratio.

The current street price of the Oukitel WP1 is around 150 Euros ($171) and the smartphone can be purchased from importers - you can learn everything you need to know about importing a smartphone from Asia in our buying guide that is specifically dedicated to this topic. With such a price tag, the Oukitel WP1 lands itself squarely in the highly competitive entry-level price range. The competing devices that we chose for comparison purposes include: The Poptel P9000 Max, the Blackview P10000 Pro and the Ulefone Armor X, as well as Oukitel’s own WP2. The less-robust smartphones from the same sub-200 Euro ($228) price range are the Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro and the BQ Aquaris U2.

Oukitel WP1 (WP Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
5.45 inch 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixel 293 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD card (tested with a 64 GB card) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, gyroscope, motion sensor, compass, Wireless Charging, OTG, Miracast, Reverse Charging
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G GSM: 1800MHz, 1900MHz, 850MHz, 900MHz; 3G WCDMA: 2100MHz, 1900MHz, 900MHz; 4G LTE: 2100MHz, 800MHz, 1800MHz, 2600MHz, 900MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.4 x 158.6 x 75.8 ( = 0.61 x 6.24 x 2.98 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13+2 MP dual-camera system
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: mono-speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, modular charger, USB-C to 3.5mm headphone adapter, USB OTG cable, Oukitel UI, 12 Months Warranty, fanless, ruggedized
Weight
256 g ( = 9.03 oz / 0.56 pounds), Power Supply: 58 g ( = 2.05 oz / 0.13 pounds)
Price
150 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - Oukitel WP1 with an IP-certification

The front of the Oukitel WP1 consists of scratch-resistant glass and the back is made of plastic and metal. The great rigidity of the smartphone can be attributed to the thick plastic sides, which also give the Oukitel WP1 its mighty weight of 256 grams. As usual with rugged smartphones, the Oukitel WP1 does not feel great in the hand, thanks to its thickness of 15 millimeters and its robust build. However, the Chinese smartphone impresses with its IP68-certification, which guarantees that the smartphone can survive for a while under 1.5 meters of fresh water.

The 5.45-inch screen of the mid-range smartphone has very thick bezels. The screen-to-body ratio only amounts to 65%. However, the competition in this specific niche of the smartphone market does not offer devices with much thinner bezels.

The non-removable plastic back cover exhibits a little flex. Nevertheless, the quality of the case is still quite satisfactory. The volume buttons and the power button are located on the right side of the device. They sit tightly in their cutouts and have a clear actuation point.

Size Comparison

176 mm / 6.93 inch 84 mm / 3.31 inch 15 mm / 0.591 inch 364 g0.802 lbs168.8 mm / 6.65 inch 85.6 mm / 3.37 inch 15.9 mm / 0.626 inch 334 g0.736 lbs165 mm / 6.5 inch 77 mm / 3.03 inch 14.7 mm / 0.579 inch 298 g0.657 lbs163 mm / 6.42 inch 76.6 mm / 3.02 inch 14 mm / 0.551 inch 256 g0.564 lbs158.6 mm / 6.24 inch 75.8 mm / 2.98 inch 15.4 mm / 0.606 inch 256 g0.564 lbs149.3 mm / 5.88 inch 71.7 mm / 2.82 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 178 g0.3924 lbs148.1 mm / 5.83 inch 72.9 mm / 2.87 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 155 g0.3417 lbs

Connectivity - Oukitel smartphone with wireless charging & reverse charging

The Oukitel smartphone has 64 GB of internal eMMC storage. However, only 52 GB of storage space is available straight out of the box. The amount of storage space can be expanded with the help of a microSD card. That being said, users who choose to do so will only be able to use one SIM card. The integrated microSD card reader supports the current standards such as SDHC and SDXC and allows external storage devices to be utilized as internal storage. Our reference-grade SD card Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 is recognized by the Oukitel WP1, but its exFAT file system is not, because it is not supported by the smartphone.

Wi-Fi direct and Miracast can be used to wirelessly cast your screen content to an external display. Thanks to an OTG adapter, peripheral devices such as keyboards and flash drives can be connected to the smartphone via its microUSB port, which supports only USB 2.0 speeds. Other major features for the lovers of the great outdoors include a huge 5000-mAh battery with QuickCharge functionality, a compass and barometer, FM radio, wireless charging and reverse charging. The latter feature works similarly to the well-known charging feature of the Huawei Mate 20 Pro. However, in the case of the Oukitel smartphone, the charging is not done wirelessly but through a USB Type-C cable.

The Oukitel WP1 does not feature a 3.5-mm headphone jack, nor does it have an LED status indicator for notifications.

Software - Oukitel UI with little customization

The WP1 runs Android 8.1 with a custom launcher from Oukitel. The security patches of our review device are out of date. They were last updated in July 2018.

The user interface resembles stock Android. There were only a few changes made. The installed apps are not gathered together in the app drawer, but instead they are strewn across multiple home screens. No third-party apps have been preinstalled on the Oukitel smartphone.

Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1

Independent journalism is made possible by advertising. We show the least amount of ads whenever possible but we intentionally show more ads when an adblocker is used. Please, switch off ad blockers and support us!

Communication and GPS - Oukitel smartphone with accurate geolocation

The Oukitel WP1 supports Bluetooth 4.0. Unfortunately, it does not support NFC. 

The integrated Wi-Fi module supports the IEEE-802.11 standards a, b, g and n and can operate not only in the 2.4 GHz spectral band but also in the 5 GHz band. In everyday use, the reception quality and the signal stability of the Wi-Fi module are quite good. In close proximity to the router (Telekom Speedport, W921V), we measured a signal attenuation of -48 dBm. In combination with our reference-grade router, the Linksys EA8500, the Oukitel WP1 achieves transfer rates of about 100 Mb/s, which is not unusual for a smartphone in this price range.

In the mobile Internet, the dual-SIM smartphone can achieve a download speed of up to 300 Mb/s, thanks to its LTE Cat-6 module. Both SIM cards can operate in 4G networks. However, the built-in LTE module only supports five LTE bands. Fortunately, all the LTE bands that are relevant in Germany are supported, including LTE band 20.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
685 (min: 657, max: 705) MBit/s ∼100% +622%
BQ Aquaris U2
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
248 MBit/s ∼36% +161%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=351)
219 MBit/s ∼32% +131%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
117 MBit/s ∼17% +23%
Blackview P10000 Pro
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼15% +6%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 MBit/s ∼14% +4%
Oukitel WP1
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 64 GB eMMC Flash
94.9 (min: 27, max: 108) MBit/s ∼14%
Oukitel WP2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
86.4 (min: 43, max: 107) MBit/s ∼13% -9%
Poptel P9000 Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash
71.6 MBit/s ∼10% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 507, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +497%
BQ Aquaris U2
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s ∼38% +126%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=351)
210 MBit/s ∼32% +89%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
119 MBit/s ∼18% +7%
Oukitel WP1
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 (min: 87, max: 129) MBit/s ∼17%
Blackview P10000 Pro
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼16% -2%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼16% -7%
Oukitel WP2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 (min: 42, max: 118) MBit/s ∼15% -8%
Poptel P9000 Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash
83.2 MBit/s ∼13% -25%
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø93.8 (27-108)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø111 (87-129)
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test outdoors
GPS Test outdoors

For geolocation, the Oukitel smartphone relies on the main global-positioning systems: GPS, GLONASS as well as SBAS. Both outdoors and indoors, your location is acquired relatively quickly and with a margin of error of about two to four meters.

In order to determine how accurate our review device is when it comes to geolocation, we take it with us on a bike ride. During this ride, we are also accompanied by the professional navigator Garmin Edge 500. Here we use both the smartphone and the navigator to map the same route in parallel. The rugged smartphone does not deviate too much from the professional navigator. There is only a 10-meter difference between the mid-range smartphone and the Garmin Edge 500 in our 8.5-km route.

GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Oukitel WP1
GPS Oukitel WP1
GPS Oukitel WP1
GPS Oukitel WP1
GPS Oukitel WP1
GPS Oukitel WP1

Telephony and Call Quality - Oukitel WP1 with Wi-Fi calling

Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1

The call quality of the Oukitel WP1 is on a good level. We did not encounter any issues while making phone calls. Our call partner described the quality of the microphone as good - voices are reproduced clearly. Unfortunately, this does not apply to the ear-speaker. Here, the voices sound distorted and very tinny. The smartphone supports Wi-Fi calling, but not VoLTE.

Cameras - Oukitel smartphone with a dual-camera setup?

Taken with the front-facing camera
Taken with the front-facing camera

The main 13MP (4160 x3120) camera on the back comes from Sony and features the image sensor known as the IMX135 CMOS. There is also an additional camera on the back from Samsung. Depth detection is the main advantage of a dual-camera system, because it enables users to create images with a Bokeh effect. However, this function does not work on the Oukitel WP1. Even if you cover up the second lens nothing will happen. This has no impact, because the Bokeh effect is software-generated.

These days, an aperture of f/2.8 can only be described as suboptimal. In low-light conditions, the 13 MP rear camera consistently delvers unusable images. Under good lighting conditions, the quality is good enough for occasional snapshots and social media. The Oukitel smartphone has trouble with focus and the dynamic range is quite poor. The photos also require some time to be taken.

The image quality of the front-facing camera is acceptable for a smartphone in this price range. The sharpness and color accuracy are quite good, as long as you disable all beauty effects. The Galaxycore GC 5025 image sensor manages to deliver photos with quite some noise even under normal lighting conditions. The front-facing camera can record 720p video at 30 FPS. The main camera can record video in 1080p at 30 FPS.

Photo mode
Photo mode
SLR mode
SLR mode
Photo mode
Photo mode
SLR mode
SLR mode
Image taken during the day
Image taken during the day
Image taken during the night
Image taken during the night
Image taken during the night with the LED flash
Image taken during the night with the LED flash
Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images

Accessories and Warranty - Oukitel WP1 with surprising extras

The box contains a modular charger (9.0 V, 2.0 A) with an appropriate USB cable, a SIM-card removal tool as well as a USB-C to 3.5-mm headphone jack adapter.

The Oukitel WP1 comes with a 12-month warranty. Please see our Guarantees, Return policies and Warranties article for country-specific information.

Input Devices and Handling - FaceUnlock and fingerprint scanner in the Oukitel WP1 are barely usable

The smartphone is controlled via on-screen buttons for “back”, “overview” and “home”. It does not support gesture controls. The capacitive 5-point multi-touch screen responds to inputs reliably. Straight out of the box, the Google Keyboard is used as the default virtual keyboard.

The active fingerprint sensor unlocks the Oukitel smartphone neither quickly nor reliably. After you put your finger on the fingerprint sensor, it takes quite a while for the smartphone to wake up from stand-by mode. The Oukitel WP1 can also be unlocked via face recognition. However, this function does not work in real life.

Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1

Display - Bright IPS Panel

Pixel arrangement
Pixel arrangement

The 5.45-inch LCD screen has an HD resolution (1440x720) and an 18:9 aspect ratio. This is why the pixel density falls below 300 PPI, which means that the screen content does not look especially sharp. However, this is good enough for day-to-day use and the screen-door effect does not become apparent until you hold the phone very close to your face.

The screen brightness of 580 cd/m² is actually quite high for a smartphone in this price range. However, the brightness is distributed very unevenly. With auto brightness enabled and the ambient light sensor engaged, we measured a similar brightness of 547 cd/m². We also got very similar results in our realistically oriented APL50 test, in which the screen displays a pattern that consists of evenly distributed dark and bright areas. Here we measured 544 cd/m².

485
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 580 cd/m² Average: 537.3 cd/m² Minimum: 27.83 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 561 cd/m²
Contrast: 660:1 (Black: 0.85 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
88.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.37
Oukitel WP1
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Oukitel WP2
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Ulefone Armor X
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Blackview P10000 Pro
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Poptel P9000 Max
LCD IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
LCD IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
BQ Aquaris U2
LCD IPS, 1280x720, 5.2
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
-1%
29%
-2%
-2%
15%
14%
41%
Brightness middle
561
472
-16%
564
1%
513
-9%
406
-28%
554
-1%
392
-30%
599
7%
Brightness
537
456
-15%
541
1%
507
-6%
397
-26%
538
0%
390
-27%
593
10%
Brightness Distribution
84
86
2%
91
8%
89
6%
90
7%
91
8%
84
0%
96
14%
Black Level *
0.85
0.32
62%
0.37
56%
0.37
56%
0.38
55%
0.61
28%
0.37
56%
Contrast
660
1475
123%
1524
131%
1386
110%
1068
62%
908
38%
1059
60%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
9.1
-69%
5.1
6%
8.5
-57%
6.7
-24%
4.86
10%
4.88
10%
1.4
74%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.8
14.8
-25%
9.6
19%
15.2
-29%
13.8
-17%
8.46
28%
10.23
13%
3.2
73%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.8
9.6
-66%
5.4
7%
10.6
-83%
8.5
-47%
5.3
9%
3.9
33%
2
66%
Gamma
2.37 93%
1.75 126%
2.1 105%
2.29 96%
2.21 100%
2.281 96%
2.044 108%
2.25 98%
CCT
7567 86%
8713 75%
7755 84%
10204 64%
8858 73%
7770 84%
6819 95%
6496 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9824 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

We measured a black value of 0.85 cd/m², which is pretty high for an IPS panel. The black value is similarly high in the APL50 test. Here it amounts to 0.86 cd/m². This is why the Oukitel WP1 has a rather low contrast ratio of 633:1.

In everyday use, the color reproduction of the IPS panel looks quite good to the naked eye. However, our measuring device that relies on SpectraCal's CalMAN software revealed a considerably elevated color temperature of 7567 K (the ideal value is 6500 K). Moreover, both the grayscale (5.8) and the mixed and primary colors (5.4) deviate significantly from the sRGB standard (here the ideal value is less than 3). Having said that, these are normal results for a smartphone with such a price tag.

CalMAN - color accuracy (AdobeRGB)
CalMAN - color accuracy (AdobeRGB)
CalMAN - color-space coverage (AdobeRGB)
CalMAN - color-space coverage (AdobeRGB)
CalMAN - grayscale (AdobeRGB)
CalMAN - grayscale (AdobeRGB)
CalMAN - saturation (AdobeRGB)
CalMAN - saturation (AdobeRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.8 ms).

The viewing angles of the IPS panel are quite wide. The screen content does not lose much brightness and the colors do not become distorted even at acute angles. However, colors do become slightly distorted at extremely acute angles.

Thanks to the high brightness, the Oukitel WP1 can be used outside without any problems. However, the low contrast ratio can prove annoying on sunny summer days.

Viewing angles...
Viewing angles...
...are stable
...are stable
Outdoors...
Outdoors...
...under an overcast sky
...under an overcast sky

Performance - MediaTek Helio P23 with good performance

The Oukitel WP1 relies on an octa-core chip from MediaTek. The Helio P23 MT6763V integrates eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores into two clusters: One cluster of high-performance cores and another cluster of energy-efficient cores. When compared to the Helio P23 MT6763T, the 2 GHz clock rate of the SoC found in the Oukitel WP1 is somewhat lower. The built-in graphics unit known as the ARM Mali-G71 MP2 features support for Vulkan and OpenGL ES 3.2.

In our benchmark suite, the Helio P23 in combination with 4 GB of RAM performs as well as the rest of the competition. Thanks to a low display resolution, both the CPU and the GPU benchmark results of the Oukitel WP1 are comparable to those of the Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro, which features the Snapdragon 625. Other smartphones with the Helio P23 perform considerably worse than the Oukitel WP1.

In everyday use, the system performance of the Oukitel smartphone is satisfactory. By and large, there is no lag when you are navigating through the system menus. However, when you are multitasking the system becomes less responsive and the loading times grow longer.

Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
2782 Points ∼21%
Oukitel WP2
1759 Points ∼13% -37%
Ulefone Armor X
1416 Points ∼11% -49%
Poptel P9000 Max
1758 Points ∼13% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3644 Points ∼27% +31%
BQ Aquaris U2
1782 Points ∼13% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
13374 Points ∼100% +381%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (2782 - 3293, n=5)
2977 Points ∼22% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 21070, n=239)
4593 Points ∼34% +65%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
3594 Points ∼42%
Oukitel WP2
2633 Points ∼30% -27%
Ulefone Armor X
1847 Points ∼21% -49%
Poptel P9000 Max
2628 Points ∼30% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4369 Points ∼51% +22%
BQ Aquaris U2
2407 Points ∼28% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8634 Points ∼100% +140%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (3594 - 4206, n=5)
3780 Points ∼44% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1634 - 11598, n=291)
4410 Points ∼51% +23%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
829 Points ∼36%
Oukitel WP2
643 Points ∼28% -22%
Ulefone Armor X
662 Points ∼28% -20%
Poptel P9000 Max
616 Points ∼26% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
880 Points ∼38% +6%
BQ Aquaris U2
651 Points ∼28% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
2333 Points ∼100% +181%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (788 - 912, n=5)
824 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (590 - 4824, n=292)
1293 Points ∼55% +56%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
4780 Points ∼57%
Oukitel WP2
3042 Points ∼37% -36%
Ulefone Armor X
3184 Points ∼38% -33%
Blackview P10000 Pro
5054 Points ∼61% +6%
Poptel P9000 Max
3278 Points ∼39% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4828 Points ∼58% +1%
BQ Aquaris U2
3744 Points ∼45% -22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8326 Points ∼100% +74%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (4693 - 4914, n=4)
4791 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2828 - 9868, n=302)
4747 Points ∼57% -1%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
6134 Points ∼61%
Oukitel WP2
4012 Points ∼40% -35%
Ulefone Armor X
4298 Points ∼43% -30%
Blackview P10000 Pro
6846 Points ∼68% +12%
Poptel P9000 Max
4609 Points ∼46% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
5716 Points ∼57% -7%
BQ Aquaris U2
4786 Points ∼48% -22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
10052 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (5840 - 6478, n=5)
6092 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3977 - 13531, n=470)
5179 Points ∼52% -16%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
1674 Points ∼60%
Oukitel WP2
920 Points ∼33% -45%
Ulefone Armor X
645 Points ∼23% -61%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1123 Points ∼40% -33%
Poptel P9000 Max
1205 Points ∼43% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
1999 Points ∼71% +19%
BQ Aquaris U2
1266 Points ∼45% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
2802 Points ∼100% +67%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1455 - 1877, n=5)
1679 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (939 - 4439, n=317)
1763 Points ∼63% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
380 Points ∼8%
Oukitel WP2
343 Points ∼8% -10%
Ulefone Armor X
102 Points ∼2% -73%
Blackview P10000 Pro
407 Points ∼9% +7%
Poptel P9000 Max
321 Points ∼7% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
442 Points ∼10% +16%
BQ Aquaris U2
307 Points ∼7% -19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
4480 Points ∼100% +1079%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (380 - 419, n=5)
390 Points ∼9% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (138 - 8206, n=317)
1491 Points ∼33% +292%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
459 Points ∼12%
Oukitel WP2
399 Points ∼10% -13%
Ulefone Armor X
125 Points ∼3% -73%
Blackview P10000 Pro
473 Points ∼12% +3%
Poptel P9000 Max
384 Points ∼10% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
535 Points ∼14% +17%
BQ Aquaris U2
366 Points ∼10% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3846 Points ∼100% +738%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (457 - 504, n=5)
469 Points ∼12% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (170 - 5200, n=320)
1392 Points ∼36% +203%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
1681 Points ∼55%
Oukitel WP2
1072 Points ∼35% -36%
Ulefone Armor X
658 Points ∼22% -61%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1160 Points ∼38% -31%
Poptel P9000 Max
1178 Points ∼38% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2023 Points ∼66% +20%
BQ Aquaris U2
1111 Points ∼36% -34%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3060 Points ∼100% +82%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1473 - 1888, n=5)
1644 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=333)
1733 Points ∼57% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
598 Points ∼7%
Oukitel WP2
491 Points ∼6% -18%
Ulefone Armor X
167 Points ∼2% -72%
Blackview P10000 Pro
617 Points ∼7% +3%
Poptel P9000 Max
477 Points ∼6% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
784 Points ∼10% +31%
BQ Aquaris U2
532 Points ∼6% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8245 Points ∼100% +1279%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (598 - 654, n=5)
612 Points ∼7% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=333)
2053 Points ∼25% +243%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
698 Points ∼12%
Oukitel WP2
558 Points ∼9% -20%
Ulefone Armor X
200 Points ∼3% -71%
Blackview P10000 Pro
688 Points ∼11% -1%
Poptel P9000 Max
550 Points ∼9% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
885 Points ∼15% +27%
BQ Aquaris U2
602 Points ∼10% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
6054 Points ∼100% +767%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (690 - 765, n=5)
711 Points ∼12% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=334)
1744 Points ∼29% +150%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
1580 Points ∼60%
Oukitel WP2
1054 Points ∼40% -33%
Ulefone Armor X
585 Points ∼22% -63%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1469 Points ∼55% -7%
Poptel P9000 Max
1118 Points ∼42% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2104 Points ∼79% +33%
BQ Aquaris U2
1150 Points ∼43% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
2653 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1374 - 1778, n=5)
1587 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (918 - 4216, n=393)
1696 Points ∼64% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
369 Points ∼9%
Oukitel WP2
149 Points ∼4% -60%
Ulefone Armor X
87 Points ∼2% -76%
Blackview P10000 Pro
53 Points ∼1% -86%
Poptel P9000 Max
322 Points ∼8% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
392 Points ∼9% +6%
BQ Aquaris U2
262 Points ∼6% -29%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
4223 Points ∼100% +1044%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (364 - 402, n=5)
378 Points ∼9% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 5246, n=395)
1221 Points ∼29% +231%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
445 Points ∼12%
Oukitel WP2
184 Points ∼5% -59%
Ulefone Armor X
107 Points ∼3% -76%
Blackview P10000 Pro
68 Points ∼2% -85%
Poptel P9000 Max
383 Points ∼10% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
479 Points ∼13% +8%
BQ Aquaris U2
316 Points ∼9% -29%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3677 Points ∼100% +726%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (439 - 486, n=5)
451 Points ∼12% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (184 - 4734, n=403)
1171 Points ∼32% +163%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
1551 Points ∼48%
Oukitel WP2
1126 Points ∼35% -27%
Ulefone Armor X
581 Points ∼18% -63%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1456 Points ∼45% -6%
Poptel P9000 Max
1176 Points ∼37% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2098 Points ∼65% +35%
BQ Aquaris U2
1174 Points ∼36% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3221 Points ∼100% +108%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1365 - 1774, n=5)
1570 Points ∼49% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4215, n=427)
1595 Points ∼50% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
575 Points ∼7%
Oukitel WP2
98 Points ∼1% -83%
Ulefone Armor X
129 Points ∼2% -78%
Blackview P10000 Pro
55 Points ∼1% -90%
Poptel P9000 Max
480 Points ∼6% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
743 Points ∼9% +29%
BQ Aquaris U2
534 Points ∼6% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8236 Points ∼100% +1332%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (575 - 623, n=5)
589 Points ∼7% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=427)
1659 Points ∼20% +189%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
668 Points ∼11%
Oukitel WP2
123 Points ∼2% -82%
Ulefone Armor X
156 Points ∼3% -77%
Blackview P10000 Pro
71 Points ∼1% -89%
Poptel P9000 Max
553 Points ∼9% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
867 Points ∼14% +30%
BQ Aquaris U2
608 Points ∼10% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
6118 Points ∼100% +816%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (654 - 728, n=5)
680 Points ∼11% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6454, n=435)
1424 Points ∼23% +113%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
10654 Points ∼30%
Oukitel WP2
8284 Points ∼23% -22%
Ulefone Armor X
10195 Points ∼28% -4%
Blackview P10000 Pro
7733 Points ∼21% -27%
Poptel P9000 Max
10560 Points ∼29% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
15870 Points ∼44% +49%
BQ Aquaris U2
9004 Points ∼25% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
35987 Points ∼100% +238%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (10234 - 12577, n=5)
10817 Points ∼30% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=586)
13218 Points ∼37% +24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
10820 Points ∼13%
Oukitel WP2
8830 Points ∼11% -18%
Ulefone Armor X
3585 Points ∼4% -67%
Blackview P10000 Pro
10997 Points ∼13% +2%
Poptel P9000 Max
10012 Points ∼12% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
13369 Points ∼16% +24%
BQ Aquaris U2
10261 Points ∼12% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
83976 Points ∼100% +676%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1152 - 12065, n=5)
9184 Points ∼11% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1152 - 162695, n=586)
18733 Points ∼22% +73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
10775 Points ∼17%
Oukitel WP2
8703 Points ∼13% -19%
Ulefone Armor X
4188 Points ∼6% -61%
Blackview P10000 Pro
10054 Points ∼16% -7%
Poptel P9000 Max
10129 Points ∼16% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
13847 Points ∼21% +29%
BQ Aquaris U2
9952 Points ∼15% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
64627 Points ∼100% +500%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (10772 - 12134, n=5)
11091 Points ∼17% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=587)
15750 Points ∼24% +46%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
21 fps ∼14%
Oukitel WP2
17 fps ∼11% -19%
Ulefone Armor X
5.9 fps ∼4% -72%
Blackview P10000 Pro
21 fps ∼14% 0%
Poptel P9000 Max
17 fps ∼11% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
23 fps ∼15% +10%
BQ Aquaris U2
25 fps ∼16% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
152 fps ∼100% +624%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (21 - 24, n=5)
22 fps ∼14% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=610)
32.6 fps ∼21% +55%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
34 fps ∼57%
Oukitel WP2
15 fps ∼25% -56%
Ulefone Armor X
9.2 fps ∼15% -73%
Blackview P10000 Pro
20 fps ∼33% -41%
Poptel P9000 Max
16 fps ∼27% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
21 fps ∼35% -38%
BQ Aquaris U2
18 fps ∼30% -47%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
60 fps ∼100% +76%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (21 - 35, n=5)
27 fps ∼45% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=613)
25.9 fps ∼43% -24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
10 fps ∼12%
Oukitel WP2
7.1 fps ∼9% -29%
Ulefone Armor X
2.7 fps ∼3% -73%
Blackview P10000 Pro
11 fps ∼14% +10%
Poptel P9000 Max
6.8 fps ∼8% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
9.9 fps ∼12% -1%
BQ Aquaris U2
15 fps ∼19% +50%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
81 fps ∼100% +710%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (10 - 11, n=5)
10.4 fps ∼13% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=531)
17.6 fps ∼22% +76%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
20 fps ∼36%
Oukitel WP2
6.7 fps ∼12% -66%
Ulefone Armor X
5.1 fps ∼9% -74%
Blackview P10000 Pro
10 fps ∼18% -50%
Poptel P9000 Max
6.8 fps ∼12% -66%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
9.4 fps ∼17% -53%
BQ Aquaris U2
7.6 fps ∼14% -62%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
56 fps ∼100% +180%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (9.7 - 20, n=5)
14.1 fps ∼25% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=535)
16.7 fps ∼30% -16%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
6.6 fps ∼11%
Ulefone Armor X
1.6 fps ∼3% -76%
Blackview P10000 Pro
6.9 fps ∼12% +5%
Poptel P9000 Max
4.5 fps ∼8% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
6.5 fps ∼11% -2%
BQ Aquaris U2
4.9 fps ∼8% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
59 fps ∼100% +794%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (6.6 - 7.2, n=5)
6.72 fps ∼11% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 88, n=392)
14.8 fps ∼25% +124%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
14 fps ∼28%
Oukitel WP2
4.5 fps ∼9% -68%
Ulefone Armor X
3.3 fps ∼7% -76%
Blackview P10000 Pro
7.1 fps ∼14% -49%
Poptel P9000 Max
4.6 fps ∼9% -67%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
6.1 fps ∼12% -56%
BQ Aquaris U2
11 fps ∼22% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
50 fps ∼100% +257%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (6.1 - 14, n=5)
9.46 fps ∼19% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (3.5 - 110, n=395)
14.3 fps ∼29% +2%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
3.7 fps ∼19%
Oukitel WP2
1.3 fps ∼7% -65%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
20 fps ∼100% +441%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1.4 - 3.7, n=5)
2.48 fps ∼12% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 59, n=97)
9.25 fps ∼46% +150%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
1.4 fps ∼5%
Oukitel WP2
0.86 fps ∼3% -39%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
31 fps ∼100% +2114%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1.4 - 2.4, n=5)
1.76 fps ∼6% +26%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 31, n=97)
6.32 fps ∼20% +351%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
6.4 fps ∼32%
Oukitel WP2
2 fps ∼10% -69%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
20 fps ∼100% +213%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (3.5 - 6.4, n=5)
4.6 fps ∼23% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 59, n=97)
13.8 fps ∼69% +116%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
3.8 fps ∼13%
Oukitel WP2
2.3 fps ∼8% -39%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
30 fps ∼100% +689%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (3.8 - 4.2, n=5)
3.88 fps ∼13% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.77 - 63, n=96)
15.1 fps ∼50% +297%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
3.8 fps ∼11%
Oukitel WP2
2.5 fps ∼7% -34%
Ulefone Armor X
0.9 fps ∼3% -76%
Blackview P10000 Pro
4 fps ∼11% +5%
Poptel P9000 Max
2.4 fps ∼7% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3.5 fps ∼10% -8%
BQ Aquaris U2
2.4 fps ∼7% -37%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
35 fps ∼100% +821%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (3.8 - 4.2, n=5)
3.9 fps ∼11% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 54, n=322)
10.1 fps ∼29% +166%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
7.5 fps ∼25%
Oukitel WP2
2.4 fps ∼8% -68%
Ulefone Armor X
1.6 fps ∼5% -79%
Blackview P10000 Pro
4.1 fps ∼14% -45%
Poptel P9000 Max
2.4 fps ∼8% -68%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3.6 fps ∼12% -52%
BQ Aquaris U2
5.6 fps ∼19% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
30 fps ∼100% +300%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (3.6 - 7.8, n=5)
5.36 fps ∼18% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 58, n=325)
9.11 fps ∼30% +21%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
84267 Points ∼29%
Oukitel WP2
51621 Points ∼18% -39%
Ulefone Armor X
46435 Points ∼16% -45%
Blackview P10000 Pro
73697 Points ∼25% -13%
Poptel P9000 Max
54819 Points ∼19% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
79099 Points ∼27% -6%
BQ Aquaris U2
56672 Points ∼19% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
292798 Points ∼100% +247%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (83745 - 94789, n=5)
86177 Points ∼29% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (41483 - 348178, n=214)
121087 Points ∼41% +44%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
62814 Points ∼28%
Oukitel WP2
42273 Points ∼19% -33%
Ulefone Armor X
37586 Points ∼16% -40%
Blackview P10000 Pro
59656 Points ∼26% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
68348 Points ∼30% +9%
BQ Aquaris U2
44219 Points ∼19% -30%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
228173 Points ∼100% +263%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (62732 - 73075, n=4)
65703 Points ∼29% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 273655, n=431)
80811 Points ∼35% +29%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
756 Points ∼55%
Oukitel WP2
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Ulefone Armor X
7 Points ∼1% -99%
Blackview P10000 Pro
771 Points ∼56% +2%
Poptel P9000 Max
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
753 Points ∼54% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
1386 Points ∼100% +83%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (10 - 762, n=5)
455 Points ∼33% -40%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=543)
714 Points ∼52% -6%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
859 Points ∼11%
Oukitel WP2
642 Points ∼8% -25%
Ulefone Armor X
188 Points ∼2% -78%
Blackview P10000 Pro
931 Points ∼12% +8%
Poptel P9000 Max
641 Points ∼8% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
999 Points ∼13% +16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
7891 Points ∼100% +819%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (859 - 949, n=5)
883 Points ∼11% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=543)
1806 Points ∼23% +110%
Memory (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
1246 Points ∼33%
Oukitel WP2
926 Points ∼24% -26%
Ulefone Armor X
900 Points ∼24% -28%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1596 Points ∼42% +28%
Poptel P9000 Max
779 Points ∼21% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
996 Points ∼26% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3791 Points ∼100% +204%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (1136 - 1403, n=5)
1266 Points ∼33% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=543)
1329 Points ∼35% +7%
System (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
2662 Points ∼33%
Oukitel WP2
1330 Points ∼16% -50%
Ulefone Armor X
1491 Points ∼18% -44%
Blackview P10000 Pro
3229 Points ∼40% +21%
Poptel P9000 Max
1868 Points ∼23% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3154 Points ∼39% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8146 Points ∼100% +206%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (2363 - 3290, n=5)
2651 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=543)
2664 Points ∼33% 0%
Overall (sort by value)
Oukitel WP1
1214 Points ∼28%
Oukitel WP2
295 Points ∼7% -76%
Ulefone Armor X
206 Points ∼5% -83%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1370 Points ∼32% +13%
Poptel P9000 Max
308 Points ∼7% -75%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
1170 Points ∼27% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
4287 Points ∼100% +253%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (384 - 1214, n=5)
887 Points ∼21% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=547)
1320 Points ∼31% +9%

Legend

 
Oukitel WP1 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel WP2 Mediatek MT6750T, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Armor X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview P10000 Pro Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Poptel P9000 Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris U2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Surfing the web with the preinstalled Google Chrome Browser does not present any difficulties. The mid-range smartphone from Oukitel achieves decent results in all of our Internet benchmarks. When you are browsing the Internet with the Oukitel WP1, even demanding websites load relatively quickly and without any glitches.

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
85.976 Points ∼100% +274%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=468)
37.7 Points ∼44% +64%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
25.787 Points ∼30% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (22 - 25.9, n=5)
23.1 Points ∼27% +1%
Oukitel WP1 (Chrome 70)
22.984 Points ∼27%
Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68)
18.86 Points ∼22% -18%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
18.148 Points ∼21% -21%
BQ Aquaris U2 (Chrome 67)
17.895 Points ∼21% -22%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.876 Points ∼21% -22%
Oukitel WP2 (Chroome Mobile 70)
15.734 Points ∼18% -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
16489 Points ∼100% +286%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=604)
5843 Points ∼35% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
4808 Points ∼29% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (3998 - 4862, n=5)
4321 Points ∼26% +1%
Oukitel WP1 (Chrome 70)
4274 Points ∼26%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
3443 Points ∼21% -19%
Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68)
3441 Points ∼21% -19%
BQ Aquaris U2 (Chrome 67)
3314 Points ∼20% -22%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
3151 Points ∼19% -26%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
3082 Points ∼19% -28%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
15875.7 ms * ∼100% -33%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
13902.5 ms * ∼88% -16%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
13902.5 ms * ∼88% -16%
Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68)
13879.9 ms * ∼87% -16%
BQ Aquaris U2 (Chrome 67)
13564 ms * ∼85% -14%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
12786.8 ms * ∼81% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V (11309 - 13077, n=5)
12230 ms * ∼77% -2%
Oukitel WP1 (Chrome 70)
11939.4 ms * ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=623)
11157 ms * ∼70% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
9879.9 ms * ∼62% +17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
2299.9 ms * ∼14% +81%

* ... smaller is better

The performance of the internal eMMC memory is similar to those of other mid-range devices. The performance of the integrated microSD card reader, which we benchmarked using our reference-grade SD card Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 (maximum read speed: 270 MB/s; maximum write speed: 150 MB/s), is also completely satisfactory.

Oukitel WP1Oukitel WP2Ulefone Armor XBlackview P10000 ProPoptel P9000 MaxXiaomi Redmi 6 ProBQ Aquaris U2Xiaomi Mi Mix 3Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-34%
-36%
-23%
-30%
38%
-26%
56%
-13%
-31%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
47.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-34%
62.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
73.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
53.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-27%
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
61.62 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
55.1 (59.5 - 74.7, n=87)
-24%
47 (19.2 - 87.1, n=356)
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
72.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
81.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
80.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
72.89 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
79.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
73.4 (83.2 - 87.2, n=87)
-10%
65.3 (29.8 - 96.5, n=356)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
20.83
13.23
-36%
10.17
-51%
14.6
-30%
11.23
-46%
72.6
249%
8.87
-57%
19.54
-6%
22.7 (3.4 - 88.2, n=96)
9%
17.8 (0.14 - 250, n=651)
-15%
Random Read 4KB
64.23
26.89
-58%
14.7
-77%
29.98
-53%
35.1
-45%
66.87
4%
46.87
-27%
133.24
107%
52.8 (11.4 - 149, n=96)
-18%
41.1 (1.59 - 173, n=651)
-36%
Sequential Write 256KB
241.34
98.58
-59%
82.85
-66%
112.3
-53%
129.64
-46%
212.87
-12%
137.7
-43%
206.76
-14%
171 (40 - 246, n=96)
-29%
85.7 (2.99 - 253, n=651)
-64%
Sequential Read 256KB
284.98
267.61
-6%
255.34
-10%
284.33
0%
269.44
-5%
278.66
-2%
253.5
-11%
674.98
137%
272 (115 - 704, n=96)
-5%
240 (12.1 - 912, n=651)
-16%

Games - Surprisingly good gaming performance thanks to 720p resolution

The Oukitel Smartphone comes with the Mali-G71 MP2, which features two shader cores that are clocked at 770 MHz. The graphics unit supports the following APIs: Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11. Even demanding 3D titles from the Google Play Store such as PUBG Mobile can run smoothly on high settings on the Oukitel WP1. However, we recommend lowering the graphics settings to eliminate occasional stuttering. Asphalt 9 Legends runs perfectly smoothly on the highest settings.

Both the touchscreen and the motion sensor work very well while gaming.

Asphalt 9 Legends
Asphalt 9 Legends
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile

Emissions - Oukitel smartphone with a tinny speaker

Temperature

The Oukitel WP1 does not get hot. However, the front of the smartphone does become quite warm. Under continuous load, the surface temperatures at the front of the device reach over 38 °C (100.4 °F).

Max. Load
 35.1 °C
95 F
35.1 °C
95 F
38.7 °C
102 F
 
 33.5 °C
92 F
33.7 °C
93 F
38.3 °C
101 F
 
 33.5 °C
92 F
33.1 °C
92 F
38.4 °C
101 F
 
Maximum: 38.7 °C = 102 F
Average: 35.5 °C = 96 F
30.9 °C
88 F
31.5 °C
89 F
32 °C
90 F
30.5 °C
87 F
31.6 °C
89 F
32.1 °C
90 F
30.3 °C
87 F
31.1 °C
88 F
32.2 °C
90 F
Maximum: 32.2 °C = 90 F
Average: 31.4 °C = 89 F
Power Supply (max.)  28.3 °C = 83 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
Oukitel WP1
Oukitel WP1

Speakers

Pink noise
Pink noise

The mono-speaker on the back has a very high volume of almost 93 dB(A). As usual with smartphones in this price range, the mids and the highs are a little overrepresented. However, as you can see from the sound graph below, there is almost no bass present. The mids and the highs are also far from being linear.

At high volume, the sound becomes distorted and very tinny. If you are going to use the WP1 to listen to music, then we recommend that you connect a pair of headphones to the device via the USB Type-C port. You can also connect external speakers to the Oukitel smartphone via Bluetooth. Doing this will result in a much better sound quality.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.835.92524.3303118.628.84024.329.35033.8396321.230.68024.83410018.537.412516.434.916017.140.520017.942.625016.848.731514.954.340015.159.650014.26363013.966.880014.870.4100014.275.8125014.781.1160014.483.4200014.383.625001483.8315013.883.9400014.884.3500014.479.363001565.7800014.764.21000014.863.51250014.855.31600014.745.1SPL26.792.9N0.883.4median 14.8median 64.2Delta0.615.333.933.728.435.736.129.630.933.430.631.822.225.124.92324.425.823.52320.320.319.825.518.228.317.439.616.650.117.155.915.963.815.971.715.971.716.772.61672.815.968.416.269.716.469.71771.816.572.316.477.516.681.21774.516.561.116.956.928.685.51.160.4median 16.6median 68.41.614.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel WP1Poptel P9000 Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel WP1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Poptel P9000 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Battery Life - Oukitel WP1 lasts for a long time

Energy Consumption

The Oukitel WP1 beats the rest of the competition in terms of energy consumption. The smartphone draws a moderate amount of power both when it is under load and when it is idle.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.15 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.77 / 1.98 / 1.99 Watt
Load midlight 3.89 / 4.78 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oukitel WP1
5000 mAh
Oukitel WP2
10214 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Blackview P10000 Pro
11000 mAh
Poptel P9000 Max
9000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4000 mAh
BQ Aquaris U2
3100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-14%
-22%
-5%
6%
-41%
6%
15%
-2%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
0.77
1.14
-48%
1.22
-58%
0.63
18%
0.92
-19%
1.3
-69%
0.8
-4%
0.49
36%
0.838 (0.7 - 1.01, n=5)
-9%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=684)
-14%
Idle Average *
1.98
1.99
-1%
2.07
-5%
2.2
-11%
1.9
4%
2.1
-6%
1.4
29%
0.67
66%
1.982 (1.2 - 2.59, n=5)
-0%
1.73 (0.6 - 6.2, n=683)
13%
Idle Maximum *
1.99
2.03
-2%
2.14
-8%
2.3
-16%
2.19
-10%
3.7
-86%
1.9
5%
0.87
56%
2.31 (1.99 - 2.62, n=5)
-16%
2.01 (0.74 - 6.6, n=684)
-1%
Load Average *
3.89
3.72
4%
4.92
-26%
3.57
8%
3.1
20%
4.5
-16%
3.4
13%
3.64
6%
3.39 (3.02 - 3.89, n=5)
13%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=678)
-4%
Load Maximum *
4.78
5.96
-25%
5.4
-13%
5.82
-22%
3.12
35%
6
-26%
5.3
-11%
9.04
-89%
4.58 (4.01 - 5, n=5)
4%
5.84 (1.2 - 14.2, n=678)
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

In our Wi-Fi test, in which we set the brightness to 150 cd/m², the 5000-mAh battery lasts for about 16 hours. Not a bad result, considering the fact that Oukitel’s own WP2 lasts only about 20% longer, despite having double the battery capacity.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 11min
Oukitel WP1
5000 mAh
Oukitel WP2
10214 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Blackview P10000 Pro
11000 mAh
Poptel P9000 Max
9000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4000 mAh
BQ Aquaris U2
3100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
971
1146
18%
845
-13%
2149
121%
1346
39%
868
-11%
686
-29%
719
-26%

Pros

+ robust case
+ bright IPS panel
+ IP-certified
+ long battery life
+ reverse charging
+ good performance...

Cons

- ...thanks to a 720p resolution
- weight
- feel
- speaker
- second camera does not work
- outdated security patches

Verdict - Niche smartphone with the right to exist

In review: Oukitel WP1. Review device provided courtesy of: Oukitel.
In review: Oukitel WP1. Review device provided courtesy of: Oukitel.

In the course of our review, the Oukitel WP1 revealed quite a few flaws such as the low contrast ratio of the IPS panel, the outdated security patches, the tinny speaker and the secondary rear camera that does not work. Nevertheless, the Chinese smartphone represents a well-rounded package for those who like to spend time outdoors. It impresses with its low price and good hardware. Moreover, the Oukitel WP1 also does well in the areas that are essential for a rugged smartphone.

The Oukitel WP1 has the right to exist in the realm of rugged smartphones. Those who do not need a robust case will be better off getting a smartphone that is easier to hold and offers more power in the same 150-Euro ($171) price range. 

Those who can live with the HD resolution of the Oukitel WP1 will get a smartphone that offers good performance and can run even demanding games, thanks to its low pixel density.

Oukitel WP1 - 01/02/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
38 / 60 → 63%
Weight
87%
Battery
100%
Display
81%
Games Performance
30 / 63 → 48%
Application Performance
50 / 70 → 72%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
58 / 91 → 64%
Camera
57%
Average
71%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Oukitel WP1 Smartphone Review
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-01- 5 (Update: 2019-02-23)