Notebookcheck

Blackview P10000 Pro Smartphone Review

Marcus Herbrich (translated by Mark Riege), 06/06/2018

The Duracell bunny among the smartphones. Often smartphones from the Far East are unable to impress customers with their battery life despite having an enormous battery capacity, due to poor software adaptations under Android. This is not the case in the Blackview P10000 Pro. To say it in advance, the Blackview smartphone achieves the longest battery life we ever measured in a smartphone – and that by a large margin.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Currently wanted: 
News Editor - Details here

The P10000 Pro smartphone model from the Chinese manufacturer Blackview is geared for endurance. With its 11,000-mAh battery, the dual-SIM smartphone is supposed to achieve a battery life of one week. Despite the long endurance, the Blackview P10000 Pro has a 6-inch 2:1 display with quite a high resolution of 2160x1080 pixels. 

The mid-range MediaTek Helio P23 SoC ensures the performance and is accompanied by 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB internal storage from Samsung. In addition, the Chinese manufacturer has equipped it with a dual camera system in the back as well as in the front. A fingerprint sensor and Quick-Charge technology are also included. 

Since Blackview is not selling its smartphones directly on the German market, the P10000 Pro can only be purchased through import companies. While (in terms of the price) the current competitors of the roughly 170 Euro (~$199) dual-SIM smartphone include the Ulefone Power 3, the Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus, the Sony Xperia L2, the Huawei P smart, the HTC Desire 12, and the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos, all these smartphones have a significantly smaller battery. We therefore consider the visually and technically very similar Oukitel K10 its main competitor.  

Blackview P10000 Pro (P Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, Sharp, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Card Reader: MicroSD: SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, compass, gyroscope, acceleration sensor, OTG, Miracast, status LED
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM: B2/B3/B5/B8 (1900/1800/850/900 MHz), WCDMA: B1/B8 (2100/900 MHz), FDD LTE:B1/B3/B7/B20 (2100/1800/2600/900/800 MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 14.7 x 165 x 77 ( = 0.58 x 6.5 x 3.03 in)
Battery
11000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 168 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 60 h
Operating System
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16+0.3 MP
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix 13+0.3 MP
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Virtual onscreen, Keyboard Light: yes, modular charger, USB cable, USB-Type-C-to-microUSB adapter, Silicone case, Blackview UI, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
298 g ( = 10.51 oz / 0.66 pounds), Power Supply: 65 g ( = 2.29 oz / 0.14 pounds)
Price
170 Euro

 

Color selection
Color selection

The huge battery size comes at the expense of the mobility. At a thickness of almost 1.5 cm (~0.6 in), the Blackview P10000 Pro is very fat for current circumstances. At 73%, the P10000 Pro also does not have a high display-to-surface ratio. The bezels around the 6-inch display are quite wide on the sides as well as the top and bottom, and the Blackview smartphone is very unwieldy overall. The enormous weight of almost 300 grams (~10.6 oz) also does not contribute to better handling. 

The case of the affordable, mid-range smartphone is primarily made of plastic and shows good workmanship. You have the choice between one version with a smooth back (probably made of plastic) in silver and gray colors and a version with a back made from real leather. Our test unit has a smooth back that is very sensitive to fingerprints. 

The frame is slightly edgy, and the stability and stiffness are very good due to its dimensions. The keys on the right side for the volume and on/off can easily be reached and have a comfortable pressure point. 

Size Comparison

Equipment

As usual in this price-range, the P10000 Pro has eMMC storage with a capacity of 64 GB. About 52 GB of that are still available to the user in the state of delivery. To expand the built-in data storage, you can also use an SD card slot, which supports microSD cards of size unknown (to us). Our 64 GB reference card was recognized and could be integrated into the internal storage.

The USB port is Type-C, based on a USB-2.0 connector to charge the device. External storage media or input devices are not recognized via USB OTG. 

In addition to Wi-Fi Direct, the mid-range device includes an FM radio, a notification LED, Wi-Fi calling, and a fingerprint reader. The wireless transfer of display content to an external monitor via Miracast is also supported and worked very well with a Sony Android TV in our test. 

Software - Android Oreo in the near future

The operating system installed on the P10000 Pro is based on Android 7.1 Nougat. According to the manufacturer, the most current version 8.1 of Google's Android platform is supposed to become available soon. At the time of the test, the system was on the security patch level of April 2018.

There is no unnecessary preinstalled bloatware. The manufacturer's own user interface is strongly reminiscent of Google's stock Android and is only minimally adapted. However, you do not need to go without special software functions such as gesture navigation in the Blackview smartphone. 

Even though we selected German as the system language, English was still used in some places.

Communication and GPS

While traveling, the P10000 Pro uses LTE Cat. 6 (300 Mbit/s downstream, 50 Mbit/s upstream) in the frequencies 800, 900, 1800, 2100, and 2600 MHz for connecting to the mobile Internet. Thus LTE band 20, which is important in rural areas in Germany, is also supported. The dual-SIM smartphone has two slots for nanoSIM cards. With both slots, you can connect to the mobile Internet at LTE speeds.

The integrated WLAN module of the Blackview smartphone handles the IEEE-802.11 a/b/g/n standards and transmits in the 2.4-GHz and the 5-GHz frequencies. The range, as well as the signal stability, is okay. While the Wi-Fi transfer speed between the Blackview smartphone and our Linksys EA 8500 reference router are on a rather low level at slightly above 100 Mbit/s, other devices of this price range neither do better nor worse in our Wi-Fi test either.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
278 MBit/s ∼100% +175%
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼68% +87%
Ulefone Power 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
106 MBit/s ∼38% +5%
Sony Xperia L2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼36% 0%
Blackview P10000 Pro
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼36%
HTC Desire 12
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.06 MBit/s ∼22% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼19% -47%
Oukitel K10
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.4 MBit/s ∼19% -47%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼19% -49%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s ∼100% +158%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼66% +70%
Blackview P10000 Pro
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼39%
Ulefone Power 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.1 MBit/s ∼35% -9%
Sony Xperia L2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
92.4 MBit/s ∼33% -15%
HTC Desire 12
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81.83 MBit/s ∼29% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼20% -49%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 MBit/s ∼18% -54%
Oukitel K10
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
29.9 MBit/s ∼11% -73%
GPS-Test indoors
GPS-Test indoors
GPS-Test outdoors
GPS-Test outdoors

The Blackview P10000 Pro determines its location using GPS and the GLONASS global navigation satellite system. We tested the connection performance of the GPS module to the satellites via the "GPS-Test" app. Outdoors, the position was located quickly with an accuracy of 3 meters (~10 ft). The accuracy indoors dropped marginally to 4 meters (~13 ft), and the connection to the satellite took slightly longer. 

In addition, we tested the mid-range smartphone on an almost 9.5 km (~5.9 miles) test tour, comparing it with the results of the Garmin Edge 500 professional navigation device. Overall, the performance of the P10000 Pro was very good for its price range. Over the whole route, the two devices showed only a difference of 10 meters (~33 ft). With this, the GPS performance of our test unit is at a good level. 

GPS Blackview P10000 Pro
GPS Blackview P10000 Pro
GPS Blackview P10000 Pro
GPS Blackview P10000 Pro
GPS Blackview P10000 Pro
GPS Blackview P10000 Pro
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Telephone Functions and Voice Quality

Using the Vodafone net, the voice quality of the P10000 Pro is good on both sides of the conversation. The voice from the earpiece is understandable and the maximum volume is sufficient. In loud surroundings, our conversation partner was hard to understand in some cases. The voice reproduction is natural and the quality of the built-in microphone was described as very understandable by our conversation partner.

The Telephone app offers all the features known from stock Android such as Favorites, the list of calls, and an integrated phone book. In addition, you can open a number pad for manual entry of phone numbers.

Cameras - Dual cameras without much benefit

Picture taken with front camera
Picture taken with front camera

The Chinese manufacturer does not offer much information on the built-in camera modules. There is a dual camera unit in the back, consisting of one 16-MP camera (4608x3456 pixels) with auto-focus and one 0.3-MP camera. Due to the aperture of f/2.0, i.e., the ratio of the focal distance to the diameter, a relatively large amount of light reaches the Sony IMX298 image sensor, which is the same as that found in the Huawei Mate 8

While the camera in the back does fairly well during daylight, scoring with a good sharpness and detail, the photos tend to be overexposed. With good illumination, close-up photos also look decent. However, the Bokeh effect created with the additional camera is of little use. 

With less light, the image noise increases, so that the images show a noticeable graininess and look quite dark and the colors dull. In darker subjects, the details become completely lost with the 16-MP camera. Videos can be recorded in a maximum of 1080p at a frame rate of 30 FPS. If you use the camera in front, the video resolution drops to 720p at 30 FPS. 

With an aperture of f/2.8, the lens in front is significantly less light sensitive and only has a resolution of 13 MP. Like in the main camera, the photo quality drops considerably with decreasing light conditions and the Bokeh effect is useless. Overall, the photos of the Sony IMX135 sensor are sufficient for selfie snapshots.  

Normal image detail
Normal image detail
2-times zoom
2-times zoom
HDR mode
HDR mode
Normal mode
Normal mode
Photos with ...
Photos with ...
... Bokeh
... Bokeh

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images

Accessories and Warranty

Besides the smartphone itself, the box of our test unit contained a silicone case, a user manual, earphones, a USB cable and a modular 10-W charger (5 V, 2 A), and Blackview also added 2 adapters for USB Type-C to microUSB and USB Type-A to USB-C. 

The warranty duration is 12 months.

Input Devices and Operation - Blackview smartphone with face recognition

In its mid-range smartphone, Blackview uses on-screen navigation in the lower third of the display. The capacitive touchscreen recognizes up to five touch-points simultaneously and has a glass surface with good sliding characteristics. The multi-touchscreen responds accurately to input up to the edge areas of the display. 

The Chinese manufacturer has preinstalled the Kika keyboard for text input. 

You can use biometric identification via fingerprints to unlock the P10000 Pro. However, the active fingerprint sensor on the right side of the case is only usable to a limited extent, since subjectively half of the unlocking attempts via fingerprint fail. In addition, the Blackview smartphone offers identification via face recognition, which works quite well in good light conditions and during the day makes up for the lack of accuracy in the fingerprint sensor.

Display - P10000 Pro with 2:1 form factor

Subpixel grid

The IPS-LC display from Sharp measures 15.3 cm (6 in) in the diagonal, having a 18:9 form factor and a resolution of 2160x1080 pixels. This results in a good pixel density of 400 PPI. Text content appears sharp even in small lettering, and pixel structures are not visible from a normal viewing distance.

While the LED backlight achieves a maximum brightness of up to 532 cd/m², this is only sufficient for an average brightness of 513 cd/m², since the brightness distribution is slightly uneven at 89%. The realistic APL-50 (Average Picture Level) test with evenly distributed light and dark areas results in a similar maximum brightness of 516 cd/m².

527
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 532 cd/m² Average: 507.1 cd/m² Minimum: 19.22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 513 cd/m²
Contrast: 1386:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 10.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.29
Blackview P10000 Pro
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
HTC Desire 12
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Sony Xperia L2
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
Huawei P smart
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Ulefone Power 3
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Oukitel K10
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Sony Xperia XZ2
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Screen
18%
28%
-3%
28%
11%
19%
-13%
34%
Brightness middle
513
620
21%
502
-2%
393
-23%
448
-13%
573
12%
494
-4%
561
9%
630
23%
Brightness
507
612
21%
499
-2%
400
-21%
451
-11%
568
12%
485
-4%
541
7%
632
25%
Brightness Distribution
89
96
8%
84
-6%
93
4%
91
2%
89
0%
87
-2%
92
3%
96
8%
Black Level *
0.37
0.57
-54%
0.2
46%
0.55
-49%
0.63
-70%
0.33
11%
0.58
-57%
0.44
-19%
Contrast
1386
1088
-22%
2510
81%
715
-48%
910
-34%
1497
8%
967
-30%
1432
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.5
3.46
59%
5.4
36%
6.1
28%
2.7
68%
4.2
51%
5.1
40%
10
-18%
1.5
82%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
15.2
7.88
48%
10.8
29%
10.4
32%
9.8
36%
6.4
58%
9.9
35%
16.7
-10%
4.3
72%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
10.6
3.9
63%
6.2
42%
4.8
55%
1.6
85%
4.6
57%
3.5
67%
11.1
-5%
2.1
80%
Gamma
2.29 105%
2.073 116%
2.07 116%
2.01 119%
2.06 117%
2.24 107%
2.16 111%
1.8 133%
2.17 111%
CCT
10204 64%
7230 90%
7660 85%
7432 87%
6557 99%
7157 91%
7253 90%
9689 67%
6513 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

The combination of display brightness and the black value of 0.37cd/m² results in a very good contrast ratio of about 1:1400. Our APL-50 measurement finds a similar high contrast (1:1396), since the black value in evenly distributed light and dark areas remains constant. 

The display analysis with a photo spectrometer and the CalMAN software shows deviations in the color (8.5) and Grayscale (10.6) display that are quite high even for this price range. At 10,000 Kelvin, the color temperature is too cool, actually resulting in a visible blue tint.

Those who do not like the standard settings of the display can readjust the contrast and color intensity.

CalMan Color Accuracy (sRGB Target Color Space)
CalMan Color Accuracy (sRGB Target Color Space)
CalMan Color Space (sRGB Target Color Space)
CalMan Color Space (sRGB Target Color Space)
CalMan Saturation (sRGB Target Color Space)
CalMan Saturation (sRGB Target Color Space)
CalMan Grayscales (sRGB Target Color Space)
CalMan Grayscales (sRGB Target Color Space)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.2 ms rise
↘ 21.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).

The Liquid Crystal Display of the Blackview P10000 Pro offers sufficient brightness to recognize the display contents even on sunny days. However, the reflective screen cannot really be read in direct sunlight. As typical for IPS panels, the stability of viewing angles is very good, and you only notice a slight reduction in the brightness from extreme viewing angles.

Performance

Quality journalism is made possible by advertising. We show the least amount of ads whenever possible. We intentionally show more ads when an adblocker is used. Please, switch off ad blockers.

The MediaTek MT6763 Helio P23 is a mid-range SoC that was introduced in 2017 and integrates 8 ARM Cortex-A53 cores in two clusters. The energy-efficient cluster has a clock speed of up to 1.65 GHz, while the four cores in the performance cluster run at up to 2.3 GHz. Thanks to the big.LITTLE architecture, the eight cores can also be used simultaneously. The integrated graphics card is an ARM Mali G71 MP2

While in everyday operation, the performance of the MT6763 in the Blackview P10000 Pro ensures smooth navigation in the Home screen, as soon as there is some demand on the processor, some stutters and delays opening apps occur. We see the system hanging sometimes during multitasking. In many benchmarks, the Blackview smartphone delivers good performance that is in parts even slightly above that of the competitors.

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
73697 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
76178 Points ∼29% +3%
HTC Desire 12
46366 Points ∼17% -37%
Sony Xperia L2
45193 Points ∼17% -39%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
61825 Points ∼23% -16%
Huawei P smart
87688 Points ∼33% +19%
Ulefone Power 3
54192 Points ∼20% -26%
Oukitel K10
54519 Points ∼20% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ2
266981 Points ∼100% +262%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (54192 - 82639, n=5)
69380 Points ∼26% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 290397, n=113)
103239 Points ∼39% +40%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
5054 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4905 Points ∼61% -3%
HTC Desire 12
3320 Points ∼41% -34%
Sony Xperia L2
3429 Points ∼42% -32%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3889 Points ∼48% -23%
Huawei P smart
4874 Points ∼60% -4%
Ulefone Power 3
4770 Points ∼59% -6%
Oukitel K10
4706 Points ∼58% -7%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8069 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (4622 - 5054, n=5)
4765 Points ∼59% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3138 - 8601, n=201)
4453 Points ∼55% -12%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
6846 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
5801 Points ∼62% -15%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5006 Points ∼54% -27%
Huawei P smart
5817 Points ∼62% -15%
Ulefone Power 3
6344 Points ∼68% -7%
Oukitel K10
6135 Points ∼66% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
9319 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (5909 - 6846, n=5)
6263 Points ∼67% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=365)
4677 Points ∼50% -32%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
771 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
722 Points ∼54% -6%
HTC Desire 12
591 Points ∼44% -23%
Sony Xperia L2
787 Points ∼58% +2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
737 Points ∼55% -4%
Huawei P smart
919 Points ∼68% +19%
Ulefone Power 3
829 Points ∼62% +8%
Oukitel K10
700 Points ∼52% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2
1346 Points ∼100% +75%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (700 - 829, n=5)
775 Points ∼58% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=441)
672 Points ∼50% -13%
Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
931 Points ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1017 Points ∼13% +9%
HTC Desire 12
18 Points ∼0% -98%
Sony Xperia L2
386 Points ∼5% -59%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
534 Points ∼7% -43%
Huawei P smart
857 Points ∼11% -8%
Ulefone Power 3
855 Points ∼11% -8%
Oukitel K10
855 Points ∼11% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ2
7868 Points ∼100% +745%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (855 - 931, n=5)
876 Points ∼11% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=441)
1505 Points ∼19% +62%
Memory (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
1596 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
961 Points ∼44% -40%
HTC Desire 12
984 Points ∼45% -38%
Sony Xperia L2
1121 Points ∼51% -30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1249 Points ∼57% -22%
Huawei P smart
1889 Points ∼86% +18%
Ulefone Power 3
1566 Points ∼71% -2%
Oukitel K10
1609 Points ∼73% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ2
2193 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (1128 - 1609, n=5)
1431 Points ∼65% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=441)
1124 Points ∼51% -30%
System (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
3229 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3236 Points ∼39% 0%
HTC Desire 12
1526 Points ∼18% -53%
Sony Xperia L2
1498 Points ∼18% -54%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
2218 Points ∼26% -31%
Huawei P smart
3223 Points ∼38% 0%
Ulefone Power 3
2906 Points ∼35% -10%
Oukitel K10
2913 Points ∼35% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8402 Points ∼100% +160%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (2543 - 3229, n=5)
2856 Points ∼34% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=441)
2244 Points ∼27% -31%
Overall (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
1370 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1229 Points ∼33% -10%
HTC Desire 12
637 Points ∼17% -54%
Sony Xperia L2
845 Points ∼23% -38%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1022 Points ∼27% -25%
Huawei P smart
1480 Points ∼40% +8%
Ulefone Power 3
1340 Points ∼36% -2%
Oukitel K10
1294 Points ∼35% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3738 Points ∼100% +173%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (1201 - 1370, n=5)
1284 Points ∼34% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=444)
1134 Points ∼30% -17%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
1469 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2038 Points ∼56% +39%
HTC Desire 12
589 Points ∼16% -60%
Sony Xperia L2
950 Points ∼26% -35%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1727 Points ∼48% +18%
Huawei P smart
1827 Points ∼50% +24%
Ulefone Power 3
1240 Points ∼34% -16%
Oukitel K10
1257 Points ∼35% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3630 Points ∼100% +147%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (1240 - 1572, n=5)
1417 Points ∼39% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (530 - 3669, n=290)
1554 Points ∼43% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
53 Points ∼1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
379 Points ∼7% +615%
HTC Desire 12
92 Points ∼2% +74%
Sony Xperia L2
151 Points ∼3% +185%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
185 Points ∼4% +249%
Huawei P smart
256 Points ∼5% +383%
Ulefone Power 3
54 Points ∼1% +2%
Oukitel K10
56 Points ∼1% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ2
5122 Points ∼100% +9564%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (53 - 396, n=5)
186 Points ∼4% +251%
Average of class Smartphone (67 - 5220, n=290)
1056 Points ∼21% +1892%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
68 Points ∼1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
463 Points ∼10% +581%
HTC Desire 12
113 Points ∼2% +66%
Sony Xperia L2
186 Points ∼4% +174%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
231 Points ∼5% +240%
Huawei P smart
316 Points ∼7% +365%
Ulefone Power 3
69 Points ∼1% +1%
Oukitel K10
71 Points ∼2% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2
4693 Points ∼100% +6801%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (68 - 446, n=5)
220 Points ∼5% +224%
Average of class Smartphone (83 - 4732, n=298)
1012 Points ∼22% +1388%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
1456 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2058 Points ∼57% +41%
HTC Desire 12
593 Points ∼16% -59%
Sony Xperia L2
920 Points ∼25% -37%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1685 Points ∼46% +16%
Huawei P smart
1787 Points ∼49% +23%
Ulefone Power 3
1237 Points ∼34% -15%
Oukitel K10
1200 Points ∼33% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3642 Points ∼100% +150%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (1200 - 1551, n=5)
1398 Points ∼38% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=321)
1455 Points ∼40% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
55 Points ∼1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
732 Points ∼9% +1231%
HTC Desire 12
148 Points ∼2% +169%
Sony Xperia L2
238 Points ∼3% +333%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
277 Points ∼3% +404%
Huawei P smart
229 Points ∼3% +316%
Ulefone Power 3
57 Points ∼1% +4%
Oukitel K10
55 Points ∼1% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8122 Points ∼100% +14667%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (55 - 582, n=5)
265 Points ∼3% +382%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=321)
1426 Points ∼18% +2493%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
71 Points ∼1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
854 Points ∼13% +1103%
HTC Desire 12
178 Points ∼3% +151%
Sony Xperia L2
285 Points ∼4% +301%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
340 Points ∼5% +379%
Huawei P smart
284 Points ∼4% +300%
Ulefone Power 3
72 Points ∼1% +1%
Oukitel K10
70 Points ∼1% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ2
6378 Points ∼100% +8883%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (70 - 676, n=5)
312 Points ∼5% +339%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6378, n=329)
1227 Points ∼19% +1628%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
7733 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
15593 Points ∼43% +102%
HTC Desire 12
9856 Points ∼27% +27%
Sony Xperia L2
10937 Points ∼31% +41%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12605 Points ∼35% +63%
Huawei P smart
14930 Points ∼42% +93%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
6847 Points ∼19% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35856 Points ∼100% +364%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (7733 - 10689, n=5)
7010 Points ∼20% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=476)
12164 Points ∼34% +57%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
10997 Points ∼14%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13219 Points ∼16% +20%
HTC Desire 12
3597 Points ∼4% -67%
Sony Xperia L2
5960 Points ∼7% -46%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7484 Points ∼9% -32%
Huawei P smart
11262 Points ∼14% +2%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
9862 Points ∼12% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
80233 Points ∼100% +630%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (10997 - 11269, n=5)
8666 Points ∼11% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=476)
15585 Points ∼19% +42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
10054 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13682 Points ∼22% +36%
HTC Desire 12
4188 Points ∼7% -58%
Sony Xperia L2
6631 Points ∼11% -34%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
8227 Points ∼13% -18%
Huawei P smart
11912 Points ∼19% +18%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
8983 Points ∼14% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2
62926 Points ∼100% +526%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (10054 - 11148, n=5)
8208 Points ∼13% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=477)
13472 Points ∼21% +34%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
21 fps ∼14%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
23 fps ∼15% +10%
HTC Desire 12
5.9 fps ∼4% -72%
Sony Xperia L2
11 fps ∼7% -48%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12 fps ∼8% -43%
Huawei P smart
19 fps ∼13% -10%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
22 fps ∼15% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2
150 fps ∼100% +614%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (21 - 22, n=5)
17.4 fps ∼12% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=502)
27 fps ∼18% +29%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
20 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
17 fps ∼28% -15%
HTC Desire 12
9.7 fps ∼16% -51%
Sony Xperia L2
19 fps ∼32% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
20 fps ∼33% 0%
Huawei P smart
18 fps ∼30% -10%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
21 fps ∼35% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% +200%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (20 - 21, n=5)
16.6 fps ∼28% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=505)
23.5 fps ∼39% +18%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
11 fps ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.9 fps ∼12% -10%
HTC Desire 12
2.7 fps ∼3% -75%
Sony Xperia L2
4.1 fps ∼5% -63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5.1 fps ∼6% -54%
Huawei P smart
8.7 fps ∼11% -21%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
10 fps ∼12% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2
82 fps ∼100% +645%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (10 - 11, n=5)
8.2 fps ∼10% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=425)
14.4 fps ∼18% +31%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
10 fps ∼17%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.4 fps ∼16% -6%
HTC Desire 12
5.4 fps ∼9% -46%
Sony Xperia L2
8.8 fps ∼15% -12%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
10 fps ∼17% 0%
Huawei P smart
8.3 fps ∼14% -17%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
10 fps ∼17% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2
59 fps ∼100% +490%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (10 - 10, n=5)
8 fps ∼14% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=427)
14.5 fps ∼25% +45%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
6.9 fps ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.5 fps ∼11% -6%
HTC Desire 12
1.6 fps ∼3% -77%
Sony Xperia L2
2.6 fps ∼4% -62%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.2 fps ∼5% -54%
Huawei P smart
5.3 fps ∼9% -23%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
6.5 fps ∼11% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% +770%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (6.6 - 6.9, n=5)
5.32 fps ∼9% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=288)
12.5 fps ∼21% +81%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
7.1 fps ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.2 fps ∼11% -13%
HTC Desire 12
3.5 fps ∼6% -51%
Sony Xperia L2
6.3 fps ∼11% -11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7.4 fps ∼13% +4%
Huawei P smart
5.2 fps ∼9% -27%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
6.2 fps ∼11% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2
55 fps ∼100% +675%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (6.3 - 7.1, n=5)
5.18 fps ∼9% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=290)
12.6 fps ∼23% +77%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
4 fps ∼11%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.5 fps ∼10% -12%
HTC Desire 12
0.91 fps ∼3% -77%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1.9 fps ∼5% -52%
Huawei P smart
3.2 fps ∼9% -20%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
3.7 fps ∼11% -7%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35 fps ∼100% +775%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (3.5 - 4, n=5)
3 fps ∼9% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (0.76 - 35, n=219)
8.51 fps ∼24% +113%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P10000 Pro
4.1 fps ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.4 fps ∼10% -17%
HTC Desire 12
1.5 fps ∼5% -63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.7 fps ∼11% -10%
Huawei P smart
2.9 fps ∼9% -29%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
3.6 fps ∼11% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2
33 fps ∼100% +705%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (3.8 - 4.1, n=5)
3.08 fps ∼9% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 50, n=222)
7.82 fps ∼24% +91%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Ulefone Power 3
4.99 fps ∼41%
Oukitel K10
5.25 fps ∼43%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (4.99 - 5.25, n=2)
5.12 fps ∼42%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼100%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Ulefone Power 3
242 Points ∼42%
Oukitel K10
242 Points ∼42%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (242 - 242, n=2)
242 Points ∼42%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 1702, n=62)
573 Points ∼100%

Legend

 
Blackview P10000 Pro Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 12 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia L2 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P smart HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Power 3 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel K10 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Subjectively, the browser speed is only average for a smartphone of the mid-range. The page contents take a bit long until they are loaded, and scrolling does not always appear smooth. The Blackview P10000 Pro is only in the middle of the comparison field in the benchmarks as well.

JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
89.54 Points ∼100% +401%
Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 224, n=360)
33.7 Points ∼38% +89%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
26.63 Points ∼30% +49%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
26.37 Points ∼29% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
23.097 Points ∼26% +29%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
22.91 Points ∼26% +28%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (17.9 - 22.9, n=5)
21.1 Points ∼24% +18%
Oukitel K10 (Standard Browser 7.1.1)
19.84 Points ∼22% +11%
Sony Xperia L2
18.363 Points ∼21% +3%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.876 Points ∼20%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
15.791 Points ∼18% -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
16774 Points ∼100% +387%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=496)
5011 Points ∼30% +46%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4968 Points ∼30% +44%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
4497 Points ∼27% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
4424 Points ∼26% +28%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (3051 - 4233, n=5)
3609 Points ∼22% +5%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
3443 Points ∼21%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
3155 Points ∼19% -8%
Oukitel K10 (Standard Browser 7.1.1)
3051 Points ∼18% -11%
Sony Xperia L2
2976 Points ∼18% -14%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
2930 Points ∼17% -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
23714.1 ms * ∼100% -85%
Oukitel K10 (Standard Browser 7.1.1)
22892.5 ms * ∼97% -79%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
17134 ms * ∼72% -34%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (12787 - 23714, n=5)
17055 ms * ∼72% -33%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
12786.8 ms * ∼54%
Sony Xperia L2
12434.9 ms * ∼52% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=515)
11883 ms * ∼50% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
10895 ms * ∼46% +15%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
9698.2 ms * ∼41% +24%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6784.4 ms * ∼29% +47%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
2394.3 ms * ∼10% +81%

* ... smaller is better

Compared to the competition, the access rates of the internal eMMC storage are only average. You can see the performance deficits in the eMMC storage in the P10000 Pro if you look at the results of the Oukitel K10.

We evaluated the speed of the integrated microSD card slot using our Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference storage card (max. read: 270 MB/s, write: 150 MB/s). The read and write rates are on the level of other mid-range smartphones.

Blackview P10000 ProXiaomi Redmi 5 PlusHTC Desire 12Sony Xperia L2Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) DuosHuawei P smartUlefone Power 3Oukitel K10Sony Xperia XZ2Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
28%
-24%
-39%
-31%
29%
41%
38%
86%
10%
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
73.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.46
-19%
61.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-17%
52.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-28%
44.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-40%
72.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
71.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
74.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
30.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-59%
51.9 (19.6 - 74.7, n=49)
-29%
43.8 (6.38 - 87.1, n=270)
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
80.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.38
4%
81.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
70.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
72.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
82.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
81.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
82.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
34.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-58%
70.2 (21.1 - 86.9, n=49)
-13%
62.1 (10.8 - 96.5, n=270)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
14.6
7.1
-51%
7.54
-48%
8.99
-38%
9.9
-32%
21.3
46%
21.25
46%
22.88
57%
17
16%
15.4 (3.4 - 71.1, n=57)
5%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=549)
-8%
Random Read 4KB
29.98
79.5
165%
16.69
-44%
22.32
-26%
24.07
-20%
66.11
121%
61.38
105%
52.15
74%
149.4
398%
48.1 (11.4 - 149, n=57)
60%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=549)
15%
Sequential Write 256KB
112.3
194.5
73%
103.77
-8%
52.77
-53%
51.96
-54%
121.07
8%
214.88
91%
213.25
90%
198.7
77%
160 (40 - 216, n=57)
42%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=549)
-36%
Sequential Read 256KB
284.33
270
-5%
211.38
-26%
70.57
-75%
204.45
-28%
269.36
-5%
294.58
4%
291.53
3%
679.2
139%
266 (115 - 704, n=57)
-6%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=549)
-26%

Games

The integrated graphics card is an ARM Mali G71 (MP2) with a clock speed of 700 MHz. The MP2 variant of the Mali G71 integrates two of the 32 possible graphics cores and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 11, and RenderScript.

More demanding 3D games from the Android Play Store cannot be played smoothly. When testing the "Asphalt Xtreme" game we could notice drops in the frame rates and long load times.

In our games test, the G71 GPU in the Oukitel K10 achieved an average frame rate of 23 FPS in the "Asphalt 8" race game. 

The control via touchscreen as well the position sensor reacts without any problems in games.

Dead Trigger 2
Dead Trigger 2
Asphalt Xtreme
Asphalt Xtreme

Emissions - The Blackview speaker is dissappointing

Temperature

The surface temperatures of the Blackview P10000 Pro remain within an uncritical range. However, under constant full load, the mid-range smartphone warms up to above 43 °C (109 °F). On the back surface, we measure just below 38 °C (100 °F). 

Max. Load
 39.1 °C
102 F
39.1 °C
102 F
42.1 °C
108 F
 
 40.1 °C
104 F
38.8 °C
102 F
43.2 °C
110 F
 
 39.5 °C
103 F
39 °C
102 F
42.2 °C
108 F
 
Maximum: 43.2 °C = 110 F
Average: 40.3 °C = 105 F
33.9 °C
93 F
35.9 °C
97 F
37.6 °C
100 F
36 °C
97 F
36 °C
97 F
37.7 °C
100 F
34.7 °C
94 F
36.1 °C
97 F
37.5 °C
100 F
Maximum: 37.7 °C = 100 F
Average: 36.2 °C = 97 F
Power Supply (max.)  32.9 °C = 91 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Voltcraft IR-260

Speaker

Speaker test: Pink-Noise
Speaker test: Pink-Noise

The mono speaker is on the bottom of the case. While the sound quality is not convincing, considering the price level, the sound is okay. 

As expected, the sound is dominated by mid and high frequencies that are not reproduced in a very linear fashion.  The Pink-Noise diagram also shows that the bass is not audible. In our test, the speaker reaches a maximum volume of up to 87 dB(A). 

There is no 3.5-mm port for audio output. Strangely, output via USB Type-C headphones is not supported by the USB Type-C connection, but only headphones with a 3.5-mm jack are recognized using an adapter.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.241.42532.944.23137.241.24031.739.85039.640.56328.330.88027.329.110026.928.412526.730.21602427.120020.931.425020.938.931519.548.340018.559.250017.565.163017.568.480015.772.2100015.875.6125016.674.3160015.872.9200015.471.7250015.572.531501672400015.880.350001679.9630016.367.9800016.358.11000016.251.91250016.449.21600016.448.3SPL28.686.5N1.163.1median 16.4Blackview P10000 Promedian 65.1Delta2.114.235.241.232.936.637.235.331.735.739.635.228.328.427.327.326.930.126.729.12427.820.931.520.939.819.54718.554.417.558.817.564.415.769.215.87216.671.715.87215.473.415.573.41675.615.880.8168216.374.116.369.816.26716.475.216.458.728.687.61.164.9median 16.4Oukitel K10median 69.22.112.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Blackview P10000 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Oukitel K10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Battery Life

Power Consumption

The power consumption is comparable with that of the comparison devices we used in this test. Compared to the Oukitel K10, the P10000 Pro uses slightly less power on average.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.09 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.63 / 2.2 / 2.3 Watt
Load midlight 3.57 / 5.82 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Blackview P10000 Pro
11000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
HTC Desire 12
2730 mAh
Sony Xperia L2
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3000 mAh
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Ulefone Power 3
6080 mAh
Oukitel K10
11000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-26%
-8%
31%
43%
1%
15%
-6%
-20%
5%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
0.7
-11%
1.13
-79%
0.5
21%
0.52
17%
0.62
2%
0.79
-25%
0.89
-41%
0.72
-14%
0.812 (0.63 - 1.07, n=5)
-29%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
-37%
Idle Average *
2.2
2.8
-27%
2.03
8%
1.12
49%
1.17
47%
1.76
20%
1.82
17%
2.48
-13%
2.21
-0%
2.04 (1.65 - 2.48, n=5)
7%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
23%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
3.4
-48%
2.05
11%
1.25
46%
1.24
46%
1.87
19%
1.87
19%
2.52
-10%
2.22
3%
2.1 (1.71 - 2.52, n=5)
9%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
15%
Load Average *
3.57
4.2
-18%
3.68
-3%
2.92
18%
1.66
54%
4.47
-25%
2.7
24%
3.13
12%
4.6
-29%
3.02 (2.7 - 3.57, n=5)
15%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
-11%
Load Maximum *
5.82
7.2
-24%
4.52
22%
4.66
20%
2.94
49%
6.39
-10%
3.62
38%
4.5
23%
9.34
-60%
4.56 (3.62 - 5.82, n=5)
22%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
4%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

The highlight of the Blackview P10000 Pro is the battery life. The 11,000-mAh battery in the mid-range smartphone puts even comparison devices that have a very good battery life to shame. In our WLAN test with an adjusted display brightness of 150 cd/m², the P10000 Pro clearly surpasses the Oukitel K10 by almost 10 hours.

Due to the Quick-Charge technology, the time it takes to fully charge it remains within limits and the battery is fully recharged within about 3 hours. 

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
35h 49min
Blackview P10000 Pro
11000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
HTC Desire 12
2730 mAh
Sony Xperia L2
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3000 mAh
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Ulefone Power 3
6080 mAh
Oukitel K10
11000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
2149
497
-77%
440
-80%
690
-68%
738
-66%
565
-74%
1376
-36%
1632
-24%
679
-68%

Pros

+ very long battery life
+ bright IPS panel
+ accurate GPS
+ 64 GB storage

Cons

- bad speaker
- large size
- heavy

Verdict - Blackview smartphone with the battery life of a feature phone

Testing the Blackview P10000 Pro. Test unit supplied by Blackview.
Testing the Blackview P10000 Pro. Test unit supplied by Blackview.

The Blackview P10000 Pro keeps its promise of an extremely long battery life. Due to the 11,000-mAh battery, the almost 300-gram (~10.6 oz) smartphone is quite unwieldy. In combination with a case thickness of almost 1.5 cm (~0.6 in), this might be a disqualifier for most buyers.   

Aside from that, the Blackview P10000 Pro scores with a high-contrast IPS panel, accurate GPS, a decent camera, and sufficient performance. However, the speaker is anything but good, and the system performance could have been a bit smoother.   

Compared to our designated main competitor, the Oukitel K10, the P10000 Pro is superior in almost all areas (GPS, WLAN, display, performance).  In addition, it lasts almost 500 minutes longer in the WLAN test with its 11,000-mAh battery. 

Considering the dimensions of the Blackview P10000 Pro in combination with the weight of a 7-inch tablet, it is difficult to offer a recommendation. However, for those who are depending on a very, very long battery life, the Blackview smartphone might be the ideal companion. 

Blackview P10000 Pro - 05/26/2018 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
43 / 60 → 71%
Weight
86%
Battery
100%
Display
81%
Games Performance
19 / 63 → 30%
Application Performance
49 / 70 → 69%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
70%
Average
71%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Blackview P10000 Pro Smartphone Review
Marcus Herbrich, 2018-06- 6 (Update: 2018-06-11)