Notebookcheck

Oukitel WP2 Smartphone Review

Florian Schaar, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (translated by Mark Riege), 11/14/2018

Power bank with a display. The Oukitel WP2 combines the two favorite aspects of Chinese smartphones: a robust presentation and huge batteries. But can the rest of the equipment keep up as well?

Oukitel has already had some heavy-weights in its product line, and we do not mean this figuratively here. Aside from its weight, the WP2 serves only light fare: The MT6750T from MediaTek is one of the slower contemporaries. Corresponding to that, the ARM Mali-T860 delivers display content for non-demanding computing algorithms. With 4 GB of RAM, 64 GB of storage, and a 16-MP dual-camera system, it should attract a few friends of the great outdoors. In addition to the certification according to IP68, there is also a very wide flash built in, which is not supposed to support the camera but instead illuminate the way for the discoverer in some dark cave. The whole thing is packaged beneath a high-resolution display in the 6-inch format.

The list of outdoor smartphones from the Far East is considerable - and some of these also have a power bank beneath their display. For the comparison with this newest brick from Oukitel, we include the K7 from the same manufacturer, as well as from the competitors: the Doogee S55 and the Blackview P10000 Pro, which both also have an over-sized battery. Another competitor sold directly in Germany is the Crosscall Action-X3.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Currently wanted: 
News Editor - Details here

Oukitel WP2 (WP Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT6750T
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, 10-point touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 57 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: USB-C/audio, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, acceleration sensor, gyroscope
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G: 850/900/1800/1900, 3G: 900/2100, 4G: band 1/3/7/8/20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15 x 176 x 84 ( = 0.59 x 6.93 x 3.31 in)
Operating System
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16.3 MPix main camera
Secondary Camera: 8.3 MPix front camera
Additional features
Speakers: 1, Keyboard: on-screen, Keyboard Light: yes, SIM tool, OTG cable, USB-C-to-3.5-mm-audio cable adapter, 12 Months Warranty, fanless, ruggedized
Weight
364 g ( = 12.84 oz / 0.8 pounds), Power Supply: 85 g ( = 3 oz / 0.19 pounds)
Price
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case

With a 6-inch screen the smartphone is huge anyway, and it is only made larger by its protective outdoor packaging. In case of a defect, it will probably get a second life as an exotic paperweight from the Far East once its warranty has run out - and we mean for large papers! With a weight of 364 grams (~12.8 oz), it should surpass some 8-inch tablets and not even be that far from the 10-inchers. In terms of its thickness as well, it can compete against some non-smartphones from the previous decade. In return, the user receives a telephone with heavy-duty screws that are supposed to suggest an indestructible package. Any attempt to twist the case with your bare hands will fail by only looking at the device. The transitions from a rubberized surface to metal elements are typical for an outdoor smartphone. The workmanship also appears consistent and free from faults here. We did not notice any gaps that accidentally turned out too large. The design should definitely attract target customers.

Size Comparison

Equipment - Everything is there, but still not impressive

Beyond its robust exterior, the Oukitel is hardly able to score. At this point, 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of storage have almost become the standard for smartphones from the Middle Kingdom. The MediaTek processors, which are not really that powerful, are also much favored. The MT6750T serving inside is no exception here, and the corresponding ARM-Mali-T860 graphics chip will also not establish any new records in terms of its frame rates, but rather the opposite. Underneath a rubberized protective cover on the bottom of the smartphone is a USB Type-C connection that transfers data at USB-2.0 speeds. Due to the lack of an audio port, audio plugs also need to use this port via an adapter that is conveniently included. There is also an included OTG adapter, allowing you to charge other USB devices from the built-in quasi-power-bank.

In addition, hidden behind another rubber cover on the left side is the slot for the two nano-SIM cards or optionally one SIM and one SD card. According to the manufacturer, the slot only supports 64 GB and the cards cannot be formatted as exFAT. However, we often found that despite such restrictions, you could still use cards with more storage. Only the file size is then limited to a maximum of 4 GB. As usual, on the opposite side are the power button and the volume rocker. Directly beneath those is a fingerprint sensor, which is a good position for right-handed users who use their thumb to unlock the phone. Unfortunately, it often happens that part of the hand comes into contact with the sensor when grabbing the phone and then unlocking gets blocked due to too many failed attempts. We did not have any complaints about its performance. Dual-camera systems in smartphones are also not very surprising. Such a system is on the back of the Oukitel WP2, storing images at 16.3 megapixels using a Samsung sensor. Directly beneath that is a very large bar, which we initially thought was a fingerprint sensor. Instead, it is supposed to brighten the dark hours for friends of the great outdoors.

Software - No bloatware in the Oukitel phone

Fortunately, Oukitel did not experiment with the operating system. There is standard Android Oreo 8.0 with an unchanged App Drawer. We also can hardly find any bloatware. Besides the Google apps and the absolutely necessary apps, there are only programs to use the built-in FM radio, a pedometer app, and an Outdoor Toolbox, which contains a compass, an altitude meter, and similar tools. The same Toolbox can also be found on some Blackview outdoor phones. Only user account control has not been implemented.

Overview page
Overview page
App drawer
App drawer
App drawer
App drawer

Communication and GPS - Fast and accurate GPS

Unfortunately, the manufacturer does not offer any exact specifications on the WLAN speeds, but it only says that it can communicate in the 2.4-GHz and 5-GHz frequency bands. Due to the speed being quite meager below 100 Mb/s, which we measured with our Linksys EA8500 reference router, we assume that it is 802.11n. This brings the Oukitel to the same level as the competitors, which all also only send and receive at around 100 Mb/s, except for the Crosscall Action-X3 that can manage almost double the speed.

The LTE chip communicates in all the frequencies used in Germany. The manufacturer does not say anything on its website whether this also goes for both SIM cards, if you use two cards.

Independent journalism is made possible by advertising. We show the least amount of ads whenever possible but we intentionally show more ads when an adblocker is used. Please, switch off ad blockers and support us!

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=307)
211 MBit/s ∼100% +144%
Crosscall Action-X3
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
199 MBit/s ∼94% +130%
Doogee S55
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
105 MBit/s ∼50% +22%
Oukitel K7
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼49% +19%
Blackview P10000 Pro
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼48% +17%
Oukitel WP2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
86.4 (min: 43, max: 107) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=307)
207 MBit/s ∼100% +103%
Crosscall Action-X3
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
201 MBit/s ∼97% +97%
Blackview P10000 Pro
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼53% +7%
Doogee S55
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
107 MBit/s ∼52% +5%
Oukitel WP2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 (min: 42, max: 118) MBit/s ∼49%
Oukitel K7
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.8 MBit/s ∼47% -5%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Oukitel WP2 Mediatek MT6750T, ARM Mali-T860 MP2; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø86 (43-107)
Oukitel WP2 Mediatek MT6750T, ARM Mali-T860 MP2; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø102 (42-118)

In terms of the GPS, the WP2 achieves outstanding values - in the synthetic test with GPS Test, which measures an accuracy of 2 m (~6.6 ft, outdoors) and 4 m (~13 ft, indoors) as well as on our test route. However, the adventurous user should not go too deeply into a cave, since the connection to the GPS and GLONASS satellites drops right after the entrance. However, this is not surprising for satellite-controlled navigation.

These values are also confirmed by our test bike route. Besides looking like the bike was magically gliding across some city waters, the routes of the Oukitel WP2 and our Garmin Edge 500 comparison navigation device look almost identical. In a route of almost 10 km (~6.2 miles), the deviation is merely 30 meters (98 ft). While the WP2 determines its position less often, the overall result is hardly any worse than that of the professional navigation device.

GPS outdoors
GPS outdoors
GPS outdoors
GPS outdoors
GPS indoors
GPS indoors
GPS indoors
GPS indoors
Test route Oukitel WP2
Test route Oukitel WP2
Test route Oukitel WP2
Test route Oukitel WP2
Test route Oukitel WP2
Test route Oukitel WP2
Test route Garmin Edge 500
Test route Garmin Edge 500
Test route Garmin Edge 500
Test route Garmin Edge 500
Test route Garmin Edge 500
Test route Garmin Edge 500

Telephone Functions and Voice Quality - No feast for the ears

The Oukitel uses the standard Android Telephone app and does not offer any special functions. The voice quality cannot be called particularly outstanding, and the caller sounds hollow and tinny but is otherwise easily understandable. Sound-recording and reproduction is noise free and acceptable, but could have been better in all cases. There is no headset included with the smartphone. 

Cameras - Average quality

Photos are important to targeted users - be it when taking the phone on a camping trip in the wilderness or when documenting the newest botched job at the construction site. This is why such smartphones like the WP2 are made. The manufacturer should not cut corners here. Initially, 16.3 megapixels and a dual-camera system with a Samsung sensor sound good, and the user will not necessarily be disappointed. While the Oukitel cannot quite keep up in the comparison with other devices such as the Blackberry Key 2 and the One Plus 6, it still offers a solid performance. In the picture of the stuffed bunny, the fur and parts of the pattern of the t-shirt in particular are still recognizable. The writing also looks sharp and easily readable. However, the Blackberry Key 2 also shows how to do better.

While for its purpose and price, we can live with some small blurriness when zooming in, there are also some significant weaknesses. The focus is not always recognized optimally. For some reason, the pine tree is strongly overexposed in our first attempt. Only after we focus on the dark tree, the image is darkened in the background for unknown reasons. Neither picture looks very balanced. The problem becomes worse when darkness settles over the WP2. Not only does the image become very dark, but it also becomes extremely blurry. This shows that it was unable to automatically find a usable focus setting here as well.

The 8-megapixel front camera does not offer much to be excited about either. All the pictures look as if the software did some heavy post-processing, which did not really improve on the results.

Main camera
Main camera
Main camera auto-focus
Main camera auto-focus
Main camera manual focus
Front camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images

Under controlled light conditions in the lab, the advantages and deficits of the sensor can be evaluated in more detail. We notice that the camera can basically score with a fairly high sharpness. However, when we look more closely, we can see some fraying and color noise that should not be there under these conditions. The contrast also seems to decrease noticeably in the lower corners. Besides the color noise that is still noticeable, the fairly high color accuracy is positive, on the other hand. Some of the colors are an exact match.

The camera leaves a mixed impression overall. It is questionable whether software would be able to improve something here. The target users might have some higher demands in this regard.

Test chart
Test chart
Detail
Detail
Color comparison
Color comparison

Accessories and Warranty - Oukitel support offers a one-year warranty

Oukitel includes the necessary accessories with the WP2: The charger with up to 9 V and 2 A required to charge the huge battery at a semi-acceptable speed. However, a complete recharge still took us 3.5 hours. In addition, there are two adapters for the USB-C connection to either use the OTG functionality or plug in headphones. A cable to plug in both the headphones and the charger also would have been nice. The headphone adapter did not prove up to the task. While we were able to hear the sound in the headphones, the speaker refused to be silent during that time, which made us doubt the usefulness of headphones.

The box also includes a SIM tool, both sides of which can be used to either push in or pull out the SIM tray. The included manual is translated into German, English, Italian, Russian, Spanish, French, and Arabic and contains information on the specifications as well as an overview of the connections and functions of the smartphone.

The manufacturer promises a one-year warranty on the phone.

Accessories
Accessories
Charger
Charger

Input Devices and Operation - Touchscreen with dropouts

Gboard serves as the default virtual keyboard. Thanks to the relatively large size of 6 inches, text input mostly succeeds without mistakes, if the touchscreen works correctly. While that registers up to 10 input points simultaneously, it seems a little sluggish to us and can forget some input from time to time. However, this might also be due to the overall performance of the system which is not really outstanding either. The ease of sliding the fingers on the display surface does not appear optimal either. On the other hand, the position sensor is more reliable, turning the display into the correct position as expected.

The WP2 uses the whole set of options to unlock the phone: PIN input, face recognition, voice recognition, and fingerprint sensor. Unlocking via face and fingerprint recognition worked reliably and could not be tricked in our brief test with a photo. The only thing that turned out to be problematic is the position of the fingerprint sensor that was often touched accidentally and then refused to unlock because of too many failed attempts.

Keyboard
Keyboard
Keyboard
Keyboard
Keyboard
Keyboard
Keyboard
Keyboard
Keyboard
Keyboard
Keyboard
Keyboard
10-point touch
10-point touch

Display - Slightly rounded

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

With a display resolution of 2160x1080, the Oukitel WP2 is one of the highest-resolution candidates in our comparison field. The display can be called average in all regards. The rounded corners that slightly round off the otherwise bulky look of the case are distinctive features. The brightness corresponds to that of an average smartphone, which is usually between 450 and 500 cd/m². This is barely sufficient to be able to read the display outdoors in normal light conditions. However, buyers expect a little more from an outdoor smartphone - for example that you can read it in strong, direct sunlight. Some devices of this type that come with up to 700 cd/m² such as the Caterpillar offer this. However, our selected comparison devices are hardly any better, except for the Doogee S55. The brightness distribution is similarly disappointing, and the difference between the top right corner and the bottom left corner is 71 cd/m². On the other hand, the black value and contrast are okay.

460
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 482 cd/m² Average: 455.9 cd/m² Minimum: 18.01 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 472 cd/m²
Contrast: 1475:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.1 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 9.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.75
Oukitel WP2
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Crosscall Action-X3
IPS, 1280x800, 5
Doogee S55
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Oukitel K7
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Blackview P10000 Pro
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
10%
-15%
12%
-1%
Brightness middle
472
417
-12%
573
21%
475
1%
513
9%
Brightness
456
425
-7%
568
25%
456
0%
507
11%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
85
-1%
83
-3%
89
3%
Black Level *
0.32
0.29
9%
0.91
-184%
0.24
25%
0.37
-16%
Contrast
1475
1438
-3%
630
-57%
1979
34%
1386
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.1
7.12
22%
6.96
24%
7.5
18%
8.5
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
14.8
10.19
31%
12.14
18%
14.2
4%
15.2
-3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.6
6.1
36%
6.3
34%
7.7
20%
10.6
-10%
Gamma
1.75 126%
2.687 82%
1.87 118%
2.26 97%
2.29 96%
CCT
8713 75%
7687 85%
7606 85%
8731 74%
10204 64%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8933 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Nature enthusiasts who want to process their pictures right on the smartphone, preparing them for printing, should not bet on the color accuracy of the WP2. With an average Delta-E value of 9.1, it is not very accurate. A blue tint is also clearly visible in the Grayscale image of our CalMAN measurement.

Color comparison
Color comparison
Color space
Color space
Grayscale
Grayscale
Saturation
Saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

As already mentioned, the brightness of the Oukitel is completely sufficient to read the display in the shade - as long as there are not too many reflections. The image below also shows that you cannot see much of the content in direct sunlight.

Direct sunlight
Direct sunlight
Shade
Shade

Similar to all modern devices, the built-in IPS display offers stable viewing angles. The usual shifting of the black edge into gray is also hardly noticeable here.

Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - Disappointing performance of the WP2

As expected, the built-in MT6750T processor from MediaTek does not deliver any new performance records. In all the benchmarks, the Oukitel WP2 finds itself at the lower end of the scale, even though the competitors are also equipped with relatively weak hardware. However, this is not really any proof of the shortcomings of the WP2, since the differences are due to the slightly weaker processor - neither more nor less. Our subjective impression of the speed is leisurely. It does not feel like you are operating a fast smartphone. On the other hand, the wait is usually not too long either. An exception is the AIDA 64 app that we use to read the hardware of the device. For some unknown reason, its response was extremely delayed. After we selected a menu item, it took up to 10 seconds for the app to respond by opening it. We did not know the reason for the duration of this test. The ARM Mali-T860 MP2 is also unable to earn any prizes and ends up at the bottom end of the comparison as well. The differences here can be traced back in parts to the different resolutions of the smartphones.

Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
1759 Points ∼39%
Crosscall Action-X3
2045 Points ∼45% +16%
Doogee S55
1888 Points ∼42% +7%
Oukitel K7
1924 Points ∼43% +9%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
1759 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼100% +157%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
2633 Points ∼61%
Crosscall Action-X3
2360 Points ∼55% -10%
Doogee S55
2765 Points ∼64% +5%
Oukitel K7
2566 Points ∼60% -3%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
2633 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼100% +64%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
643 Points ∼51%
Crosscall Action-X3
634 Points ∼50% -1%
Doogee S55
682 Points ∼54% +6%
Oukitel K7
664 Points ∼52% +3%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
643 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼100% +98%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
3042 Points ∼60%
Crosscall Action-X3
3666 Points ∼73% +21%
Doogee S55
3257 Points ∼64% +7%
Oukitel K7
Points ∼0% -100%
Blackview P10000 Pro
5054 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
3042 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=256)
4551 Points ∼90% +50%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
4012 Points ∼59%
Crosscall Action-X3
4665 Points ∼68% +16%
Doogee S55
4190 Points ∼61% +4%
Oukitel K7
Points ∼0% -100%
Blackview P10000 Pro
6846 Points ∼100% +71%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
4012 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼72% +24%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
920 Points ∼54%
Crosscall Action-X3
1131 Points ∼66% +23%
Doogee S55
1037 Points ∼61% +13%
Oukitel K7
1035 Points ∼61% +13%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1123 Points ∼66% +22%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
920 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼100% +86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
343 Points ∼23%
Crosscall Action-X3
277 Points ∼19% -19%
Doogee S55
344 Points ∼23% 0%
Oukitel K7
326 Points ∼22% -5%
Blackview P10000 Pro
407 Points ∼28% +19%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
343 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼100% +327%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
399 Points ∼29%
Crosscall Action-X3
333 Points ∼24% -17%
Doogee S55
404 Points ∼30% +1%
Oukitel K7
385 Points ∼28% -4%
Blackview P10000 Pro
473 Points ∼35% +19%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
399 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼100% +241%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
1072 Points ∼63%
Crosscall Action-X3
1148 Points ∼68% +7%
Doogee S55
1033 Points ∼61% -4%
Oukitel K7
1014 Points ∼60% -5%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1160 Points ∼69% +8%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
1072 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=292)
1689 Points ∼100% +58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
491 Points ∼24%
Crosscall Action-X3
478 Points ∼23% -3%
Doogee S55
497 Points ∼24% +1%
Oukitel K7
497 Points ∼24% +1%
Blackview P10000 Pro
617 Points ∼30% +26%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
491 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=292)
2068 Points ∼100% +321%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
558 Points ∼32%
Crosscall Action-X3
549 Points ∼32% -2%
Doogee S55
562 Points ∼32% +1%
Oukitel K7
561 Points ∼32% +1%
Blackview P10000 Pro
688 Points ∼40% +23%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
558 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=293)
1734 Points ∼100% +211%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
1054 Points ∼64%
Crosscall Action-X3
1098 Points ∼67% +4%
Doogee S55
1124 Points ∼68% +7%
Oukitel K7
1113 Points ∼68% +6%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1469 Points ∼89% +39%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
1054 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼100% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
149 Points ∼13%
Crosscall Action-X3
234 Points ∼20% +57%
Doogee S55
199 Points ∼17% +34%
Oukitel K7
90 Points ∼8% -40%
Blackview P10000 Pro
53 Points ∼4% -64%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
149 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼100% +696%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
184 Points ∼16%
Crosscall Action-X3
284 Points ∼25% +54%
Doogee S55
244 Points ∼22% +33%
Oukitel K7
113 Points ∼10% -39%
Blackview P10000 Pro
68 Points ∼6% -63%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
184 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼100% +516%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
1126 Points ∼73%
Crosscall Action-X3
1099 Points ∼71% -2%
Doogee S55
1110 Points ∼72% -1%
Oukitel K7
1054 Points ∼68% -6%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1456 Points ∼95% +29%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
1126 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼100% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
98 Points ∼6%
Crosscall Action-X3
492 Points ∼30% +402%
Doogee S55
127 Points ∼8% +30%
Oukitel K7
109 Points ∼7% +11%
Blackview P10000 Pro
55 Points ∼3% -44%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
98 Points ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼100% +1565%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
123 Points ∼9%
Crosscall Action-X3
561 Points ∼40% +356%
Doogee S55
158 Points ∼11% +28%
Oukitel K7
136 Points ∼10% +11%
Blackview P10000 Pro
71 Points ∼5% -42%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
123 Points ∼9% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼100% +1028%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
8284 Points ∼64%
Crosscall Action-X3
8864 Points ∼69% +7%
Doogee S55
9934 Points ∼77% +20%
Oukitel K7
Points ∼0% -100%
Blackview P10000 Pro
7733 Points ∼60% -7%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
8284 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼100% +55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
8830 Points ∼49%
Crosscall Action-X3
9342 Points ∼52% +6%
Doogee S55
9476 Points ∼53% +7%
Oukitel K7
Points ∼0% -100%
Blackview P10000 Pro
10997 Points ∼61% +25%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
8830 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼100% +104%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
8703 Points ∼58%
Crosscall Action-X3
9231 Points ∼61% +6%
Doogee S55
9574 Points ∼63% +10%
Oukitel K7
Points ∼0% -100%
Blackview P10000 Pro
10054 Points ∼67% +16%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
8703 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼100% +74%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
17 fps ∼54%
Crosscall Action-X3
15 fps ∼48% -12%
Doogee S55
17 fps ∼54% 0%
Oukitel K7
12 fps ∼38% -29%
Blackview P10000 Pro
21 fps ∼67% +24%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
17 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼100% +85%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
15 fps ∼58%
Crosscall Action-X3
26 fps ∼100% +73%
Doogee S55
23 fps ∼88% +53%
Oukitel K7
12 fps ∼46% -20%
Blackview P10000 Pro
20 fps ∼77% +33%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
15 fps ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼96% +67%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
7.1 fps ∼42%
Crosscall Action-X3
6.7 fps ∼40% -6%
Doogee S55
7.1 fps ∼42% 0%
Oukitel K7
5.9 fps ∼35% -17%
Blackview P10000 Pro
11 fps ∼65% +55%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
7.1 fps ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼100% +137%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
6.7 fps ∼42%
Crosscall Action-X3
14 fps ∼88% +109%
Doogee S55
13 fps ∼81% +94%
Oukitel K7
5.6 fps ∼35% -16%
Blackview P10000 Pro
10 fps ∼63% +49%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
6.7 fps ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼100% +139%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Crosscall Action-X3
4.4 fps ∼31%
Doogee S55
4.7 fps ∼33%
Oukitel K7
4.2 fps ∼29%
Blackview P10000 Pro
6.9 fps ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
4.5 fps ∼32%
Crosscall Action-X3
10 fps ∼72% +122%
Doogee S55
9.5 fps ∼68% +111%
Oukitel K7
3.8 fps ∼27% -16%
Blackview P10000 Pro
7.1 fps ∼51% +58%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
4.5 fps ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼100% +209%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
1.3 fps ∼13%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
1.3 fps ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼100% +685%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
0.86 fps ∼13%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
0.86 fps ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼100% +655%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
2 fps ∼14%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
2 fps ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼100% +620%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
2.3 fps ∼15%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
2.3 fps ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼100% +583%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
2.5 fps ∼25%
Crosscall Action-X3
2.4 fps ∼24% -4%
Doogee S55
2.5 fps ∼25% 0%
Oukitel K7
2.5 fps ∼25% 0%
Blackview P10000 Pro
4 fps ∼41% +60%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
2.5 fps ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼100% +294%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
2.4 fps ∼27%
Crosscall Action-X3
5.3 fps ∼60% +121%
Doogee S55
4.9 fps ∼55% +104%
Oukitel K7
2.4 fps ∼27% 0%
Blackview P10000 Pro
4.1 fps ∼46% +71%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
2.4 fps ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼100% +270%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
51621 Points ∼44%
Crosscall Action-X3
57023 Points ∼48% +10%
Doogee S55
56375 Points ∼48% +9%
Oukitel K7
52278 Points ∼44% +1%
Blackview P10000 Pro
73697 Points ∼62% +43%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
51621 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼100% +129%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
42273 Points ∼55%
Crosscall Action-X3
42924 Points ∼56% +2%
Oukitel K7
43320 Points ∼57% +2%
Blackview P10000 Pro
59656 Points ∼78% +41%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
42273 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=390)
76481 Points ∼100% +81%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
10 Points ∼1%
Doogee S55
624 Points ∼81% +6140%
Oukitel K7
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Blackview P10000 Pro
771 Points ∼100% +7610%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼91% +6880%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
642 Points ∼37%
Doogee S55
649 Points ∼37% +1%
Oukitel K7
471 Points ∼27% -27%
Blackview P10000 Pro
931 Points ∼54% +45%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
642 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼100% +171%
Memory (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
926 Points ∼58%
Doogee S55
1030 Points ∼65% +11%
Oukitel K7
967 Points ∼61% +4%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1596 Points ∼100% +72%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
926 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼78% +34%
System (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
1330 Points ∼41%
Doogee S55
2003 Points ∼62% +51%
Oukitel K7
1786 Points ∼55% +34%
Blackview P10000 Pro
3229 Points ∼100% +143%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
1330 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼78% +89%
Overall (sort by value)
Oukitel WP2
295 Points ∼22%
Crosscall Action-X3
Points ∼0% -100%
Doogee S55
956 Points ∼70% +224%
Oukitel K7
298 Points ∼22% +1%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1370 Points ∼100% +364%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
295 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼92% +325%

Legend

 
Oukitel WP2 Mediatek MT6750T, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Crosscall Action-X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Doogee S55 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel K7 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview P10000 Pro Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

In the browser benchmark, the Oukitel WP2 also positions itself at the back, even if it again comes close to the competitors. We did not notice any particular slowness subjectively.

JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼100% +133%
Doogee S55 (Chrome 67)
18.724 Points ∼51% +19%
Oukitel K7 (Chrome 67)
18.23 Points ∼50% +16%
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)
18.048 Points ∼49% +15%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.876 Points ∼49% +14%
Oukitel WP2 (Chroome Mobile 70)
15.734 Points ∼43%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
15.7 Points ∼43% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=558)
5562 Points ∼100% +80%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
3443 Points ∼62% +12%
Doogee S55 (Chrome 67)
3417 Points ∼61% +11%
Oukitel K7 (Chrome 67)
3403 Points ∼61% +10%
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)
3251 Points ∼58% +5%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
3082 Points ∼55%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
3082 Points ∼55% 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Oukitel K7 (Chrome 67)
13931.4 ms * ∼100% -0%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (13903 - 13903, n=2)
13903 ms * ∼100% -0%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
13902.5 ms * ∼100%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
13902.5 ms * ∼100% -0%
Doogee S55 (Chrome 67)
13510.3 ms * ∼97% +3%
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)
13331 ms * ∼96% +4%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
12786.8 ms * ∼92% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼82% +17%

* ... smaller is better

After the initial startup of the smartphone, 6.77 GB of the 64 GB storage is already used up by the operating system and software. According to the manufacturer, the internal storage can be expanded by up to 64 GB using a microSD card. We tested this with an 8-GB card from SanDisk and did not notice any problems. In terms of the read and write speeds, the WP2 did not really cover itself with glory, unless you consider the results being the exact average of the class as such. In our test with the Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference card, the microSD connection received similar values as the comparison devices. Only the Doogee S55 was significantly slower during writing than the competitors.

Oukitel WP2Crosscall Action-X3Doogee S55Oukitel K7Blackview P10000 ProAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
19%
-11%
6%
18%
36%
2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
47.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
56.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
17%
14.11
-71%
56.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18%
73.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
53%
53.8 (14.1 - 74.7, n=69)
12%
45.6 (3.4 - 87.1, n=319)
-5%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
72.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
84.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16%
73.73
2%
72.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
80.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
72.4 (21.1 - 86.9, n=69)
0%
63.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=319)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
13.23
8.4
-37%
13.17
0%
13.03
-2%
14.6
10%
19.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=78)
50%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
22%
Random Read 4KB
26.89
47
75%
28.86
7%
27.78
3%
29.98
11%
50.3 (11.4 - 149, n=78)
87%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
42%
Sequential Write 256KB
98.58
139.3
41%
97.14
-1%
110.35
12%
112.3
14%
164 (40 - 246, n=78)
66%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB
267.61
264.7
-1%
268.07
0%
280.32
5%
284.33
6%
269 (115 - 704, n=78)
1%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-14%

Games - Playable, but no feast for the eyes

The built-in ARM Mali-T860 graphics solution corresponds exactly to the processor inside. While we don't necessarily mean this positively, the chip still does its job. Even graphically more-demanding games such as Asphalt 9 can be played on the smartphone without stutters, but this can only be done with significantly reduced effects. The position sensor does a decent job. Shadow Fight 3 also ran smoothly.

Asphalt 9
Asphalt 9
Shadow Fight 3
Shadow Fight 3

Emissions

Temperature

Due to the thick case, the temperature development of the Oukitel WP2 is not problematic. According to our measurements, the temperatures remain below body temperature even under load. During idle operation, they remain far below the 30-°C mark (86 °F). We often see a similar temperature development in robust smartphones. However, our subjective impression is different, and the smartphone feels unusually warm during operation and benchmark tests, which would point at a higher temperature development. This might be due to the different temperature perceptions of various materials. 

Max. Load
 35.1 °C
95 F
34.8 °C
95 F
34.8 °C
95 F
 
 34.3 °C
94 F
33.3 °C
92 F
34.1 °C
93 F
 
 31.6 °C
89 F
32.3 °C
90 F
34.4 °C
94 F
 
Maximum: 35.1 °C = 95 F
Average: 33.9 °C = 93 F
29.2 °C
85 F
29.9 °C
86 F
31.7 °C
89 F
29 °C
84 F
29.1 °C
84 F
31.7 °C
89 F
29.2 °C
85 F
28.9 °C
84 F
30.7 °C
87 F
Maximum: 31.7 °C = 89 F
Average: 29.9 °C = 86 F
Power Supply (max.)  33.5 °C = 92 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
Heat map - front
Heat map - front
Heat map - back
Heat map - back

Speaker - Bad, but it can always be heard

Pink Noise
Pink Noise

Another negative point is the speaker and the audio system overall. The only thing we can mention positively is the volume, which can be turned up quite high. However, we perceive a noticeable noise at full volume. The bass reproduction is the worst, but this does not differ much from other smartphones. The difference is that in this candidate all the other tone levels of the mono speaker are significantly below average as well.
The challenge continues when you connect a headset. Of course we can discuss the pros and cons of a separate audio connector. In this case, you could argue that it would have been another connection that allows liquids and dust to enter into the smartphone. However, as a user you would expect that the regular speaker of the phone turns itself off as soon as you connect a headphone to the audio port. Since this is not the case in the Oukitel, the connection becomes completely useless. 

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.730252535.83126.823.74026.327.85029.837.76327.426.5802125.510019.525.312518.821.116019.225.420017.625.825016.931.131515.841.34001549.35001560.963014.766.680014.871100014.673.9125014.373.2160013.473.3200014.473.3250014.473.7315014.873.840001577500014.881.1630014.779.780001570.31000014.962.71250015.254.81600015.742.2SPL26.887.3N0.966.5median 15median 66.6Delta1.215.83030.130.123.529.328.426.92632.826.624.824.520.723.219.535.718.644.221.451.72552.617.454.516.255.418.458.215.461.713.56513.764.213.768.414.673.414.975.914.476.414.777.114.677.414.878.314.776.914.676.51575.614.966.915.159.614.951.827.287.30.967.5median 14.9median 651.411.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel WP2Apple iPhone XS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel WP2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone XS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Battery Life

Power Consumption - Low consumption

In the WP2, the attempt of Chinese manufacturers to be less wasteful with power continues. In the direct comparison, only the Blackview P10000 Pro is more energy-efficient. However, the average of the class still uses 7% less power. The low consumption can probably be traced back mostly to the weak SoC.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.28 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.14 / 1.99 / 2.03 Watt
Load midlight 3.72 / 5.96 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oukitel WP2
10214 mAh
Crosscall Action-X3
3500 mAh
Doogee S55
5500 mAh
Oukitel K7
10000 mAh
Blackview P10000 Pro
11000 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6750T
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-21%
-118%
-5%
5%
0%
7%
Idle Minimum *
1.14
1.1
4%
2.3
-102%
1.01
11%
0.63
45%
1.14
-0%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=637)
23%
Idle Average *
1.99
1.9
5%
3.5
-76%
1.99
-0%
2.2
-11%
1.99
-0%
1.719 (0.6 - 6.2, n=636)
14%
Idle Maximum *
2.03
2.9
-43%
5.9
-191%
2.09
-3%
2.3
-13%
2.03
-0%
1.997 (0.74 - 6.6, n=637)
2%
Load Average *
3.72
4.8
-29%
8.7
-134%
4.1
-10%
3.57
4%
3.72
-0%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=631)
-9%
Load Maximum *
5.96
8.4
-41%
11.2
-88%
7.2
-21%
5.82
2%
5.96
-0%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=631)
4%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life - The Oukitel WP2 really tried

As expected, the WP2 is able to offer a very good battery life, leaving about half of the competitors behind. However, this is no reason for celebration, since those have batteries that are barely half the size of the WP2's battery. Considering the size of the built-in battery, the runtimes are therefore rather disappointing, but overall they correspond to what the Oukitel K7 has already shown before. On the other hand, the Blackview P10000 Pro, which lasts almost twice as long in the WLAN test, shows what would really be possible with a battery of this size. So overall, we deem the performance as disappointing.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
24h 08min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)
9h 04min
Oukitel WP2
10214 mAh
Crosscall Action-X3
3500 mAh
Doogee S55
5500 mAh
Oukitel K7
10000 mAh
Blackview P10000 Pro
11000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-26%
-26%
13%
88%
Reader / Idle
1448
WiFi v1.3
1146
843
-26%
844
-26%
1294
13%
2149
88%
Load
544

Pros

+ robust
+ large display
+ high resolution
+ very good GPS/GLONASS
+ sufficient storage
+ water-proof according to IP68

Cons

- unsuitable battery life
- weak system performance
- thick and heavy
- bad audio quality
- mediocre camera
- speaker does not turn itself off when using the headset

Verdict

In review: Oukitel WP2. Test unit provided by Oukitel.
In review: Oukitel WP2. Test unit provided by Oukitel.

During the course of this test, we saw that the flippantly written introductory headline of this test was not so wrong after all. In some ways, the Oukitel WP2 really is a power bank with a few smartphone functions. This should not be taken the wrong way; the WP2 is not a bad smartphone. The workmanship is decent, the case is robust, and the display is large with a high resolution. The working memory and storage are also sufficiently large. The processor and graphics unit are not the best, but let's be honest, we get what we pay for here. Therefore we cannot complain to Oukitel about the price-performance ratio. 

Power bank with smartphone functionality and disappointing battery life.

However, somehow the whole thing does not feel right. Why the large screen, if due to the low performance many productive tasks cannot be accomplished anyway? Why only a mediocre camera, when taking photos outdoors would be an important concern here? Why not rather a little smaller and brighter instead? What makes us uncomfortable here is apparently the very unbalanced selection of the components. But probably the largest complaint is the disappointing battery life. You do not need to carry a 350-gram (12 oz) brick to achieve these runtimes. So we can only say that the tastes and needs vary, and even the Oukitel will find interested buyers who are looking for exactly this combination. For those buyers, we can recommend it.

Oukitel WP2 - 11/12/2018 v6
Florian Schaar

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
72%
Connectivity
34 / 60 → 57%
Weight
85%
Battery
100%
Display
82%
Games Performance
15 / 63 → 23%
Application Performance
34 / 70 → 49%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
61%
Average
68%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Oukitel WP2 Smartphone Review
Florian Schaar, 2018-11-14 (Update: 2018-11-14)