Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs Intel Core i9-12900H vs Intel Core i5-1035G7

Intel Core i7-1065G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1065G7

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC of the Ice Lake U product family designed for thin laptops and Ultrabooks. It was announced in May 2019 (Computex). The CPU has four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading) clocked at 1.3 (base) - 3.9 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.8 GHz and all four 3.5 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock).

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The biggest improvement of Ice Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics adapter called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 EUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU from current Ryzen APUs.

Performance

The average 1065G7 in our database is most comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U and the Intel Core i5-8259U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a so-so result and a direct consequence of Intel's inability to make the best of its brand-new 10 nm node. The Core i7-10710U, a 10th generation processor built with an older 14 nm process, will easily rip a 1065G7 to pieces. That said, the 1065G7 will surely beat a 10710U in terms of energy efficiency.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 1065G7 that we know of. It can be around 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The quad-core Intel CPU is built with Intel's second-gen 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-12900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900H

The Intel Core i9-12900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900HK, the 12900H does not offer the open multiplicator (for overclocking) but the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900H in our database proves to be an outrageously fast CPU, ripping the Ryzen 9 6900HX to pieces as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Perhaps surprisingly, the i9's multi-thread performance is not much higher than that of the Core i7-12700H, suggesting the latter might be a better bang for the buck.

With its decent cooling solution and a long-term Power Limit of 110 W, the Asus StudioBook 16 H7600ZW is one of the fastest laptops built around the i9-12900H that we know of. It can be more than 80% faster than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Power consumption

The Core i9 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The CPU's maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900H is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-1035G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1035G7

The Intel Core i5-1035G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Ice -Lake-U generation that was announced in Mai 2019 (Computex). It integrates four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading) clocked at 1.2 (base) - 3.7 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.6 GHz and all four 3.3 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock). The Core i5-1035G7 is the second fastest Ice Lake-U chip at the time of announcement in 2019.

The biggest improvement for Ice-Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics adapter called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 CUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU in current Ryzen APUs.

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4-3733).

Performance

The average 1035G7 in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 3 4300U and the Core i5-10210U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which isn't bad at all as of late 2021. The Core i5-1035G4 and the Core i5-1035G1 are two other chips that nearly match the 1035G7 in multi-thread performance.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 22 W, the Surface Laptop 3 13 is among the fastest laptops built around the 1035G7 that we know of. It can be at least 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 25 W if required with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. Those values are a little too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The processor is built with Intel's second-gen 10 nm process for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-1065G7Intel Core i9-12900HIntel Core i5-1035G7
CodenameIce Lake-UAlder Lake-HIce Lake-U
SeriesIntel Ice LakeIntel Alder Lake-PIntel Ice Lake
Series: Ice Lake Ice Lake-U
Intel Core i5-1038NG72 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G7 « 1.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G71.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G41.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G11 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G11.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1038NG72 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G71.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G7 « 1.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G41.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G11 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G11.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1300 - 3900 MHz1800 - 5000 MHz1200 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB1.2 MB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB11.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB24 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 814 / 204 / 8
TDP15 Watt45 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1526BGA1744BGA1526
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1065G7
28.2 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1035G7
27.4 pt (46%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96     avg: 104.9     median: 106 (60%)     max: 112 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 371     avg: 636     median: 578 (11%)     max: 920 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3127     avg: 3615     median: 3437 (3%)     max: 4281 Points
min: 7359     avg: 15133     median: 15946.5 (15%)     max: 19648 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1050     avg: 1131     median: 1131 (48%)     max: 1212 Points
min: 1634     avg: 1829     median: 1863.5 (78%)     max: 1930 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 358     avg: 438.1     median: 449 (49%)     max: 474 Points
min: 624     avg: 706     median: 714.5 (78%)     max: 738 Points
min: 380     avg: 415.3     median: 427 (47%)     max: 439 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1081     avg: 1510     median: 1543 (4%)     max: 2024 Points
min: 2681     avg: 5717     median: 6056.5 (15%)     max: 7471 Points
min: 1043     avg: 1302     median: 1233 (3%)     max: 1630 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 288     avg: 648     median: 662.5 (4%)     max: 836 Points
min: 1395     avg: 2454     median: 2576.5 (16%)     max: 3077 Points
min: 539     avg: 662     median: 712 (4%)     max: 736 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 141     avg: 174.2     median: 178.1 (49%)     max: 190 Points
min: 235     avg: 262.3     median: 266 (74%)     max: 277 Points
min: 153     avg: 165     median: 170 (47%)     max: 172 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.69     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (9%)     max: 9.37 Points
min: 12.08     avg: 23.6     median: 25.3 (33%)     max: 32.77 Points
min: 4.87     avg: 6.4     median: 6.4 (8%)     max: 7.94 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.09     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (50%)     max: 2.17 Points
min: 2.83     avg: 3     median: 3 (71%)     max: 3.3 Points
min: 1.77     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (45%)     max: 2.05 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7083     avg: 7254     median: 7270.5 (44%)     max: 7390 Points
min: 7952     avg: 8475     median: 8235 (50%)     max: 9498 Points
min: 6044     avg: 6450     median: 6449.5 (39%)     max: 6855 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16551     avg: 21959     median: 22401.5 (16%)     max: 26481 Points
min: 24313     avg: 43425     median: 47767 (35%)     max: 60567 Points
min: 15373     avg: 19601     median: 19601 (14%)     max: 23829 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 48178     avg: 66910     median: 70976.5 (45%)     max: 77409 Points
20535 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12846     avg: 13385     median: 13227.5 (16%)     max: 14567 Points
8073 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 232.9     avg: 281     median: 255.6 (3%)     max: 354.4 s
min: 187.176     avg: 206.8     median: 197.8 (2%)     max: 265.116 s
265 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.969     avg: 8     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 9.186 s
min: 3.421     avg: 4.1     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5.062 s
7.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4908     avg: 4953     median: 4956 (8%)     max: 4995 Points
min: 7620     avg: 8202     median: 7937 (13%)     max: 9328 Points
4513 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 10406     avg: 17024     median: 17254.5 (10%)     max: 22898 MIPS
min: 34684     avg: 60849     median: 64908.5 (37%)     max: 76677 MIPS
min: 13921     avg: 17144     median: 18342 (11%)     max: 19168 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3289     avg: 4284     median: 4393 (52%)     max: 4589 MIPS
min: 5302     avg: 5843     median: 5881 (69%)     max: 6289 MIPS
min: 4091     avg: 4183     median: 4205 (50%)     max: 4252 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 40.6     avg: 45.1     median: 45.1 (15%)     max: 49.5 fps
min: 67.5     avg: 105.8     median: 111.4 (37%)     max: 126.7 fps
38.1 fps (13%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 175.5     avg: 184.9     median: 184.9 (43%)     max: 194.3 fps
min: 225     avg: 266.6     median: 263.3 (61%)     max: 317 fps
167.5 fps (39%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 2.2     avg: 4.6     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 6.38 fps
min: 8.05     avg: 17.1     median: 17.8 (31%)     max: 22.5 fps
min: 4.632     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (8%)     max: 4.71 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.449     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.459 GB/s
min: 0.864     avg: 1.1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
0.4 GB/s (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.79 GB/s
min: 1.5     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (13%)     max: 5 GB/s
min: 8.6     avg: 10.5     median: 10.3 (27%)     max: 12.8 GB/s
4.7 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 273     avg: 420.7     median: 376 (5%)     max: 850 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 675     avg: 882     median: 836 (6%)     max: 1650 Seconds
min: 160     avg: 231.3     median: 205.5 (1%)     max: 451 Seconds
min: 771     avg: 880     median: 794 (6%)     max: 1075 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.661     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.798 sec
min: 0.4218     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.506 sec
0.8 sec (18%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9122     avg: 9209     median: 9208.5 (20%)     max: 9295 Points
min: 10122     avg: 13153     median: 13453 (29%)     max: 14655 Points
8736 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.64     avg: 11.7     median: 11.7 (3%)     max: 14.72 s
min: 7.3     avg: 7.7     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 8.329 s
9.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.92     avg: 23.2     median: 23.2 (1%)     max: 27.42 s
min: 16.373     avg: 17.3     median: 17.2 (1%)     max: 18.439 s
20.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 431     avg: 481     median: 481 (2%)     max: 531 s
min: 385.4     avg: 410.8     median: 398.6 (2%)     max: 474.148 s
456.5 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
26223 Points (20%)
min: 33640     avg: 52620     median: 53621 (41%)     max: 62706 Points
24378 Points (19%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3401     avg: 8138     median: 8479.5 (21%)     max: 10494 Points
min: 10552     avg: 21276     median: 22264 (55%)     max: 26126 Points
min: 4649     avg: 6765     median: 6764.5 (17%)     max: 8880 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 29124     avg: 49182     median: 52060.5 (42%)     max: 54876 Points
min: 70655     avg: 87893     median: 91477 (74%)     max: 103016 Points
min: 18908     avg: 34807     median: 34806.5 (28%)     max: 50705 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 29190     avg: 46812     median: 48876 (40%)     max: 54424 Points
min: 71651     avg: 89380     median: 91745 (74%)     max: 103757 Points
min: 18887     avg: 34525     median: 34524.5 (28%)     max: 50162 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 52974     avg: 57448     median: 57798 (48%)     max: 60169 Points
min: 81857     avg: 89973     median: 89999 (75%)     max: 100472 Points
min: 54327     avg: 54876     median: 54876 (46%)     max: 55425 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5065     avg: 7011     median: 7365 (19%)     max: 8472 Points
min: 9262     avg: 17875     median: 18691.5 (47%)     max: 22123 Points
min: 5499     avg: 6720     median: 6720 (17%)     max: 7941 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2752     avg: 9928     median: 10445 (19%)     max: 12021 Points
min: 9703     avg: 25492     median: 26678.5 (48%)     max: 31176 Points
min: 7242     avg: 9252     median: 9251.5 (16%)     max: 11261 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2273     avg: 3365     median: 3523 (15%)     max: 4435 Points
min: 5062     avg: 11544     median: 12039 (51%)     max: 14424 Points
3618 Points (15%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1893     avg: 2368     median: 2384 (60%)     max: 2652 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9258     avg: 10829     median: 10337.5 (40%)     max: 12856 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2093     avg: 2248     median: 2203 (70%)     max: 2440 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 8918     avg: 10207     median: 9930 (41%)     max: 11663 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 948     avg: 1274     median: 1316 (51%)     max: 1348 Points
min: 1631     avg: 1800     median: 1820 (71%)     max: 1897 Points
1163 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2464     avg: 4215     median: 4406.5 (8%)     max: 4855 Points
min: 8519     avg: 11913     median: 12237 (22%)     max: 14376 Points
2713 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1184     avg: 1295     median: 1310 (6%)     max: 1334 Points
min: 1553     avg: 1695     median: 1710 (7%)     max: 1838 Points
min: 1126     avg: 1135     median: 1135 (5%)     max: 1144 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3375     avg: 4436     median: 4648 (15%)     max: 4839 Points
min: 8374     avg: 10525     median: 9892 (31%)     max: 12717 Points
min: 2707     avg: 3488     median: 3488 (11%)     max: 4269 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5239     avg: 5587     median: 5637.5 (56%)     max: 5771 Points
min: 7191     avg: 7533     median: 7650 (76%)     max: 8015 Points
min: 4947     avg: 5289     median: 5439 (54%)     max: 5481 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14557     avg: 17869     median: 18459.5 (18%)     max: 18849 Points
min: 30682     avg: 36787     median: 36900 (37%)     max: 41134 Points
min: 12220     avg: 15692     median: 17322 (17%)     max: 17534 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5752 Points (64%)
7309 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
18772 Points (25%)
46641 Points (61%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
14396 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3863 Points (50%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 788     avg: 912     median: 861.5 (1%)     max: 1249 ms
min: 490     avg: 520     median: 508 (1%)     max: 608 ms
min: 880     avg: 972     median: 971.5 (1%)     max: 1063 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
88.9 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25166     avg: 37201     median: 36670 (27%)     max: 53081 Points
min: 84027     avg: 87439     median: 86645 (63%)     max: 92438 Points
min: 31078     avg: 33114     median: 33114 (24%)     max: 35150 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 239     avg: 262     median: 264 (73%)     max: 279 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 130     avg: 199.4     median: 201.5 (36%)     max: 216 Points
min: 263     avg: 297.3     median: 296 (53%)     max: 332 Points
186 Points (33%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1025 Points (38%)
min: 1515     avg: 1846     median: 1872 (70%)     max: 2108 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 23.4     avg: 30.5     median: 26 (4%)     max: 48.3 Watt
min: 52     avg: 109.2     median: 101.2 (17%)     max: 180 Watt
23.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.1     avg: 34.8     median: 34.5 (6%)     max: 48.9 Watt
min: 74.6     avg: 126.3     median: 124 (23%)     max: 222 Watt
min: 24.3     avg: 33.1     median: 33.1 (6%)     max: 41.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.05     avg: 29.1     median: 27 (18%)     max: 96.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.3 Watt (6%)
min: 7.99     avg: 18.1     median: 14.8 (16%)     max: 34.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 15.5     avg: 19.1     median: 19.3 (14%)     max: 25.5 Points per Watt
min: 13.6     avg: 19.9     median: 19.1 (14%)     max: 27.5 Points per Watt
min: 17.6     avg: 19.9     median: 19.9 (15%)     max: 22.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1065G7 → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 213% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1035G7 → 92% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 07. 04:44:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11399 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11401 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754534697s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 06 Aug 2025 11:23:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11399 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 11399 +0.037s ... 0.052s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.005s ... 0.056s

#11 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.039s ... 0.096s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11401 +0.004s ... 0.1s

#13 got single benchmarks 11401 +0.007s ... 0.106s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.106s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.103s ... 0.21s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.21s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)