Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

Intel Core i7-1065G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1065G7

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC of the Ice Lake U product family designed for thin laptops and Ultrabooks. It was announced in May 2019 (Computex). The CPU has four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading) clocked at 1.3 (base) - 3.9 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.8 GHz and all four 3.5 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock).

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The biggest improvement of Ice Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics adapter called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 EUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU from current Ryzen APUs.

Performance

The average 1065G7 in our database is most comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U and the Intel Core i5-8259U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a so-so result and a direct consequence of Intel's inability to make the best of its brand-new 10 nm node. The Core i7-10710U, a 10th generation processor built with an older 14 nm process, will easily rip a 1065G7 to pieces. That said, the 1065G7 will surely beat a 10710U in terms of energy efficiency.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 1065G7 that we know of. It can be around 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The quad-core Intel CPU is built with Intel's second-gen 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800HS

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4800HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.9 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT for a total of 16 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. The 4800HS is the 35 Watt version (-10 Watt) of the Ryzen 7 4800H.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics adapter with 7 CUs at up to 1,600 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB of L3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4800HS in our database is an impressively fast CPU that isn't afraid of picking a fight with the Intel Core i9-10980HK and the Core i7-11850H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The Ryzen is fast enough for nearly all apps and games you could possibly throw at it, as of mid 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 35 W. Which is too high to allow for passively cooled setups.

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is built with TSMC's 7 nm process leading to average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800H is a Renoir APU designed for larger, more powerful laptops with room for better termals. The Ryzen features eight Zen 2 cores running at 2.9 GHz (base clock speed) to 4.2 GHz (Boost). The CPU also has 8 MB of L3 cache and a Vega series integrated GPU. Thread-doubling SMT tech is enabled in this processor, allowing for up to 16 concurrent processing threads.

Architecture

Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and in part thanks to this fact AMD promises an up to 2x higher performance-per-watt figure compared to Ryzen 3000 series mobile APUs. This isn't the only noteworthy change however as Zen 2 architecture is leagues ahead of the outgoing Zen+ when it comes to single-core performance. Renoir family processors feature up to 8 CPU cores compared to 4 cores of the previous generation mobile AMD CPUs.

A 4800H will work with dual-channel DDR4-3200 or quad-channel LPDDR4-4266 RAM. The important difference between desktop Ryzen 4000 and mobile Ryzen 4000 processors is that the latter do not have PCI-Express 4.0 support, meaning those blazing-fast NVMe SSDs will be limited to a throughput of 3.9 GB/s.

The Ryzen 7 gets soldered straight to the motherboard (FP6 socket) and is thus not user-replaceable. Please go to our Renoir processor family hub for more information on these CPUs.

Performance

The average 4800H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-11850H, the Core i7-1360P and also the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This highlights just how great of a job Renoir designers did, back in the day.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of 45 W, the MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK is among the fastest laptops built around the 4800H that we know of. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

Ryzen 7 4800H features the Radeon RX Vega 7, a 7 CU integrated graphics adapter running at up to 1,600 MHz. The iGPU's underlying architecture is fairly old as of 2021, yet its 448 shaders will let you play many games of 2020 and 2021 as long as you stick to reasonable resolutions and presets. F1 2021 runs well at medium quality, 1080p resolution, to give you an example. A Vega 7 can be as fast as a GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, or as slow as an 80 EU Iris Xe; this depends on the benchmark as well as on cooling system performance and TDP settings of a laptop as mentioned above. As the iGPU has no VRAM of its own, it is paramount that fast system RAM is used.

The Vega definitely supports UHD 2160p monitors at 60 Hz. This iGPU is capable of hardware decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9-encoded videos. There is no AV1 support to be found here though. Such a video will have to be SW-decoded leading to much lower energy efficiency.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W. Laptop makers are allowed to change that to anything between 35 W and 54 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. The Ryzen 7 4800HS is a 35 W edition of the Ryzen 7 4800H that trades away a bit of performance for lower power consumption. In both cases, an active cooling solution is a must.

Both the 4800H and the 4800HS are built with TSMC's 7 nm process for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-1065G7AMD Ryzen 7 4800HSAMD Ryzen 7 4800H
SeriesIntel Ice LakeAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
CodenameIce Lake-URenoir-HS (Zen 2)Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Intel Core i5-1038NG72 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G7 « 1.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G71.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G41.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G11 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G11.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS « 2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H « 2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Clock1300 - 3900 MHz2900 - 4200 MHz2900 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 168 / 16
TDP15 Watt35 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1526FP6FP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1065G7
29.8 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800HS
34.6 pt (48%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800H
35.1 pt (49%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3127     avg: 3615     median: 3437 (3%)     max: 4281 Points
min: 9644     avg: 10889     median: 11135.5 (10%)     max: 11642 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1050     avg: 1131     median: 1131 (48%)     max: 1212 Points
min: 1248     avg: 1254     median: 1253.5 (53%)     max: 1259 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 358     avg: 438.1     median: 449 (50%)     max: 474 Points
482 Points (54%)
min: 462     avg: 482.1     median: 485 (54%)     max: 491 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1081     avg: 1510     median: 1543 (4%)     max: 2024 Points
3869 Points (9%)
min: 3692     avg: 4275     median: 4339.5 (11%)     max: 4663 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 288     avg: 648     median: 662.5 (4%)     max: 836 Points
min: 1634     avg: 1701     median: 1700.5 (11%)     max: 1767 Points
min: 1652     avg: 1859     median: 1854 (12%)     max: 1995 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 141     avg: 174.2     median: 178.1 (54%)     max: 190 Points
min: 186     avg: 186.5     median: 186.5 (56%)     max: 187 Points
min: 186     avg: 188     median: 188 (57%)     max: 191 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.69     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (9%)     max: 9.37 Points
19.9 Points (26%)
min: 19.95     avg: 21     median: 21.1 (27%)     max: 21.92 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.09     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (52%)     max: 2.17 Points
2.2 Points (54%)
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (54%)     max: 2.19 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7083     avg: 7254     median: 7270.5 (44%)     max: 7390 Points
5705 Points (34%)
min: 5643     avg: 5684     median: 5684 (34%)     max: 5725 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16551     avg: 21959     median: 22401.5 (16%)     max: 26481 Points
36313 Points (26%)
min: 37236     avg: 37276     median: 37276 (27%)     max: 37316 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 61208     avg: 62934     median: 62933.5 (44%)     max: 64659 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 9712     avg: 9782     median: 9781.5 (12%)     max: 9851 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 232.9     avg: 281     median: 255.6 (3%)     max: 354.4 s
91.1 s (1%)
90.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.969     avg: 8     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 9.186 s
4.1 s (1%)
3.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4908     avg: 4953     median: 4956 (8%)     max: 4995 Points
4642 Points (7%)
4601 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 10406     avg: 17024     median: 17254.5 (10%)     max: 22898 MIPS
48392 MIPS (28%)
min: 44827     avg: 49860     median: 50075 (29%)     max: 53883 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3289     avg: 4284     median: 4393 (53%)     max: 4589 MIPS
4655 MIPS (56%)
min: 4575     avg: 4678     median: 4686 (56%)     max: 4743 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 40.6     avg: 45.1     median: 45.1 (16%)     max: 49.5 fps
99 fps (35%)
min: 101.5     avg: 102.7     median: 102.7 (36%)     max: 103.9 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 175.5     avg: 184.9     median: 184.9 (43%)     max: 194.3 fps
216.5 fps (50%)
min: 209     avg: 215.6     median: 215.6 (50%)     max: 222.2 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 2.2     avg: 4.6     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 6.38 fps
12 fps (21%)
min: 10.8     avg: 12.6     median: 12.8 (22%)     max: 14.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.449     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.459 GB/s
1.1 GB/s (0%)
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.79 GB/s
1.8 GB/s (31%)
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (13%)     max: 5 GB/s
10.3 GB/s (27%)
10.3 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 675     avg: 882     median: 836 (6%)     max: 1650 Seconds
284 Seconds (2%)
min: 248     avg: 266     median: 262 (2%)     max: 299 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.661     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.798 sec
0.6 sec (13%)
min: 0.562     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.603 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9122     avg: 9209     median: 9208.5 (20%)     max: 9295 Points
12785 Points (27%)
min: 12018     avg: 12683     median: 12683 (27%)     max: 13348 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.64     avg: 11.7     median: 11.7 (3%)     max: 14.72 s
9.7 s (2%)
9.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.92     avg: 23.2     median: 23.2 (1%)     max: 27.42 s
22.3 s (1%)
22.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 431     avg: 481     median: 481 (2%)     max: 531 s
561 s (2%)
564 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
26223 Points (23%)
min: 51446     avg: 57673     median: 57672.5 (50%)     max: 63899 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3401     avg: 8138     median: 8479.5 (23%)     max: 10494 Points
14924 Points (40%)
min: 11401     avg: 14657     median: 15160 (41%)     max: 15838 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 29124     avg: 49182     median: 52060.5 (42%)     max: 54876 Points
min: 60191     avg: 61331     median: 61331 (50%)     max: 62471 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 29190     avg: 46812     median: 48876 (40%)     max: 54424 Points
min: 59769     avg: 62130     median: 62130 (50%)     max: 64491 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 52974     avg: 57448     median: 57798 (49%)     max: 60169 Points
min: 65802     avg: 66827     median: 67127 (57%)     max: 67553 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5065     avg: 7011     median: 7365 (19%)     max: 8472 Points
16062 Points (41%)
min: 13135     avg: 15479     median: 15669 (40%)     max: 16818 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2752     avg: 9928     median: 10445 (19%)     max: 12021 Points
21217 Points (38%)
min: 19980     avg: 21647     median: 21847 (39%)     max: 22687 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2273     avg: 3365     median: 3523 (15%)     max: 4435 Points
min: 8264     avg: 8441     median: 8440.5 (36%)     max: 8617 Points
min: 6255     avg: 8706     median: 8925 (38%)     max: 9631 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 948     avg: 1274     median: 1316 (56%)     max: 1348 Points
min: 1188     avg: 1191     median: 1190.5 (50%)     max: 1193 Points
min: 1154     avg: 1188     median: 1191 (50%)     max: 1207 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2464     avg: 4215     median: 4406.5 (8%)     max: 4855 Points
min: 7540     avg: 7611     median: 7611 (14%)     max: 7682 Points
min: 5920     avg: 7725     median: 7955 (14%)     max: 8672 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1184     avg: 1295     median: 1310 (6%)     max: 1334 Points
1196 Points (5%)
min: 1177     avg: 1184     median: 1184 (5%)     max: 1191 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3375     avg: 4436     median: 4648 (15%)     max: 4839 Points
7878 Points (25%)
min: 6027     avg: 7108     median: 7108 (22%)     max: 8189 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5239     avg: 5587     median: 5637.5 (56%)     max: 5771 Points
min: 5114     avg: 5134     median: 5134 (51%)     max: 5154 Points
min: 4808     avg: 4950     median: 4949.5 (49%)     max: 5091 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14557     avg: 17869     median: 18459.5 (21%)     max: 18849 Points
min: 28937     avg: 29224     median: 29223.5 (33%)     max: 29510 Points
min: 23108     avg: 26453     median: 26453 (29%)     max: 29798 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5752 Points (78%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
18772 Points (46%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
14396 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3863 Points (75%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 788     avg: 912     median: 861.5 (1%)     max: 1249 ms
786 ms (1%)
min: 783     avg: 826     median: 791 (1%)     max: 1220 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
88.9 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25166     avg: 37201     median: 36670 (33%)     max: 53081 Points
min: 37080     avg: 43309     median: 43309 (39%)     max: 49538 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 130     avg: 199.4     median: 201.5 (42%)     max: 216 Points
214 Points (45%)
min: 204     avg: 217.7     median: 218.5 (46%)     max: 229 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1025 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 23.4     avg: 30.5     median: 26 (4%)     max: 48.3 Watt
64.2 Watt (11%)
min: 62     avg: 76.6     median: 83 (14%)     max: 84.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.1     avg: 34.8     median: 34.5 (6%)     max: 48.9 Watt
65.1 Watt (12%)
min: 81     avg: 84     median: 84 (15%)     max: 86.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.5     avg: 19.1     median: 19.3 (14%)     max: 25.5 Points per Watt
25.1 Points per Watt (19%)
min: 20.9     avg: 22.1     median: 22.1 (16%)     max: 23.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1065G7 → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS → 156% n=37

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800H → 159% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 05. 22:22:56

#0 checking url part for id 11399 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11689 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11677 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11399 +0.016s ... 0.064s

#8 got single benchmarks 11399 +0.124s ... 0.188s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11689 +0.016s ... 0.204s

#10 got single benchmarks 11689 +0.021s ... 0.225s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11677 +0.014s ... 0.239s

#12 got single benchmarks 11677 +0.093s ... 0.332s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.332s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.524s ... 0.856s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.857s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)