Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs Intel Core i5-11300H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core i5-11300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11300H

The Intel Core i5-11300H is a mid range SoC for thin and light gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H35 generation and was announced early 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and can vary from 2.6 (28 W TDP) to 3.1 GHz (35 W). The boost of a single and two cores under load can reach up to 4.4 GHz. All four cores can reach up to 4 GHz. The L3 cache is reduced to 8 MB compared to the 12 MB of the higher end i7 models.

The SoC also has the improved Xe graphics adapter with 80 CUs running at up to 1,300 MHz.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip.

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Performance

The average 11300H in our database proves to be an OK lower mid-range CPU, as of early 2022, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U. The Core i5 will handle most day-to-day activities with ease, only sweating at the sight of latest triple-A games and similar tasks.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 40 W, the Nitro 5 AN517-53 is among the fastest laptops built around the 11300H that we know of. It can be around 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a default TDP of 28 W to 35 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, these values are way too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i5-11300H is built with Intel's third-generation 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Core i5-11300HIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Tiger LakeIntel Meteor Lake-H
CodenameMeteor Lake-HTiger Lake-H35Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11390H3.4 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11375H3.3 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11370H3.3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11320H3.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11300H « 3.1 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz3100 - 4400 MHz3800 - 4800 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB8 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 816 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP45 Watt35 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm7 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C110 °C
SocketBGA2049BGA1449/LGA1449BGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1300 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache320 KB
L2 Cache5 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
44.2 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11300H
32.9 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
42.1 pt (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 108     avg: 109     median: 109 (76%)     max: 110 Points
min: 2.2     avg: 87.5     median: 102.8 (71%)     max: 107.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 828     avg: 948     median: 947.5 (18%)     max: 1067 Points
min: 6.94     avg: 724     median: 773 (14%)     max: 1024 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12688     avg: 17445     median: 18177 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
min: 3313     avg: 5564     median: 5702 (5%)     max: 6581 Points
min: 9769     avg: 14873     median: 14777 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1620     avg: 1803     median: 1810.5 (77%)     max: 1906 Points
min: 1218     avg: 1373     median: 1378 (59%)     max: 1431 Points
min: 1496     avg: 1727     median: 1749 (74%)     max: 1801 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622     avg: 694     median: 700.5 (78%)     max: 735 Points
min: 431     avg: 522     median: 529 (59%)     max: 548 Points
min: 620     avg: 667     median: 671 (75%)     max: 693 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4843     avg: 6712     median: 7138.5 (17%)     max: 7651 Points
min: 1300     avg: 2146     median: 2247.5 (5%)     max: 2533 Points
min: 3798     avg: 5762     median: 5671 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1581.9     avg: 2669     median: 2777.5 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
min: 632     avg: 895     median: 961 (6%)     max: 990 Points
min: 1950     avg: 2452     median: 2476 (16%)     max: 2857.55 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238     avg: 262.8     median: 264.5 (80%)     max: 280 Points
min: 123     avg: 173.4     median: 187 (56%)     max: 211 Points
min: 230     avg: 254.2     median: 255 (77%)     max: 268 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
34 Points (44%)
11 Points (14%)
min: 29.98     avg: 31.7     median: 31.7 (41%)     max: 33.49 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (81%)
2.5 Points (62%)
min: 3.07     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (77%)     max: 3.13 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10300 Points (62%)
8663 Points (52%)
min: 9828     avg: 9874     median: 9873.5 (60%)     max: 9919 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
59935 Points (43%)
30491 Points (22%)
min: 56242     avg: 58357     median: 58357 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
88902 Points (62%)
min: 13726     avg: 54366     median: 54365.5 (38%)     max: 95005 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14374 Points (18%)
min: 13938     avg: 48020     median: 48020 (58%)     max: 82102 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 292.1     avg: 366.7     median: 366.7 (4%)     max: 441.275 s
139.6 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
3.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7940     avg: 12898     median: 12898 (20%)     max: 17856 Points
4926 Points (8%)
min: 7084     avg: 7404     median: 7403.5 (12%)     max: 7723 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 52522     avg: 67897     median: 69924 (40%)     max: 76331 MIPS
min: 17573     avg: 23562     median: 24688.5 (14%)     max: 26001 MIPS
min: 42601     avg: 58800     median: 60099 (35%)     max: 70074 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4502     avg: 5381     median: 5524.5 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
min: 4603     avg: 4872     median: 4930.5 (59%)     max: 4969 MIPS
min: 5037     avg: 5349     median: 5401 (65%)     max: 5540 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
158.2 fps (55%)
58.9 fps (21%)
min: 128.04     avg: 141.1     median: 141.1 (49%)     max: 154.15 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
335.5 fps (77%)
215.6 fps (50%)
min: 282.57     avg: 303.8     median: 303.8 (70%)     max: 325 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1     avg: 19.5     median: 20.8 (37%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 4.32     avg: 7     median: 7.3 (13%)     max: 8.38 fps
min: 9.93     avg: 16.4     median: 16.4 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (28%)     max: 1.8 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (13%)
1.7 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (25%)     max: 11.3 GB/s
5.3 GB/s (14%)
min: 10.2     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 285     avg: 357.4     median: 327.5 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
min: 296     avg: 420.3     median: 397 (5%)     max: 637 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 163     avg: 201.3     median: 190 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
min: 466     avg: 572     median: 530 (4%)     max: 862 Seconds
min: 178     avg: 234.3     median: 225 (2%)     max: 349 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
min: 0.6     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.644 sec
min: 0.4609     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.516 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854     avg: 11420     median: 11420 (24%)     max: 12986 Points
10250 Points (22%)
13097 Points (28%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (1%)     max: 6.751 s
8 s (2%)
min: 7.046     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.168 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.9 s (1%)
16.9 s (1%)
min: 15.767     avg: 16     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 16.125 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
304.4 s (1%)
404.7 s (2%)
min: 394.754     avg: 397.5     median: 397.5 (2%)     max: 400.292 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
80494 Points (70%)
34470 Points (30%)
min: 62245     avg: 68433     median: 68432.5 (60%)     max: 74620 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12693     avg: 20942     median: 21875 (59%)     max: 24629 Points
min: 5383     avg: 9909     median: 10532 (28%)     max: 12133 Points
min: 6531     avg: 17980     median: 19912 (54%)     max: 23598 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 75240     avg: 75478     median: 75478 (61%)     max: 75716 Points
min: 48608     avg: 55131     median: 55902.5 (45%)     max: 60111 Points
min: 68032     avg: 76390     median: 79025 (64%)     max: 85435 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 75340     avg: 75417     median: 75417 (61%)     max: 75494 Points
min: 48519     avg: 49823     median: 49822.5 (40%)     max: 51126 Points
66925 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677     avg: 84868     median: 84868 (71%)     max: 91059 Points
min: 57986     avg: 62641     median: 64261 (54%)     max: 65675 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 17876     avg: 18479     median: 18664 (47%)     max: 18896 Points
min: 5577     avg: 8084     median: 8912 (23%)     max: 9472 Points
min: 7073     avg: 15232     median: 16405 (42%)     max: 19549 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21106     avg: 27129     median: 27113 (48%)     max: 30623 Points
min: 6781     avg: 11660     median: 13112.5 (23%)     max: 13901 Points
min: 5249     avg: 22153     median: 23288.5 (42%)     max: 28337 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6307     avg: 10831     median: 11696 (49%)     max: 12209 Points
min: 3124     avg: 4581     median: 4850 (20%)     max: 5424 Points
min: 3922     avg: 8634     median: 9368 (39%)     max: 12145 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2199     avg: 2459     median: 2499 (67%)     max: 2570 Points
min: 1901     avg: 2388     median: 2414 (65%)     max: 2459 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 12825     avg: 13697     median: 13864 (55%)     max: 14160 Points
min: 10464     avg: 12459     median: 12539 (49%)     max: 13656 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1700     avg: 1825     median: 1847.5 (78%)     max: 1902 Points
min: 1342     avg: 1410     median: 1415 (60%)     max: 1462 Points
min: 1689     avg: 1765     median: 1768 (75%)     max: 1824 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10441     avg: 13019     median: 13109 (23%)     max: 14230 Points
min: 3631     avg: 4642     median: 4749 (9%)     max: 5499 Points
min: 10017     avg: 12075     median: 12248 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1821     avg: 1826     median: 1825.5 (8%)     max: 1830 Points
min: 1684     avg: 1712     median: 1708 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13228     avg: 13600     median: 13600 (43%)     max: 13972 Points
min: 11684     avg: 12163     median: 12366 (39%)     max: 12438 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7602 Points (76%)
6019 Points (60%)
min: 6838     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (69%)     max: 6927 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
47960 Points (53%)
18976 Points (21%)
min: 43897     avg: 44574     median: 44573.5 (49%)     max: 45250 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 494     avg: 524     median: 517 (1%)     max: 594 ms
min: 687     avg: 698     median: 697 (1%)     max: 737 ms
min: 416.4     avg: 533     median: 534.5 (1%)     max: 585 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
163.2 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 90543     avg: 94193     median: 93980 (84%)     max: 98055 Points
min: 60242     avg: 62203     median: 62911 (57%)     max: 63457 Points
min: 77142     avg: 87778     median: 89268 (80%)     max: 93476 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 237     avg: 260.6     median: 267.3 (77%)     max: 269 Points
min: 236     avg: 254     median: 256 (74%)     max: 263 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 237     avg: 281.5     median: 292 (61%)     max: 295 Points
min: 227     avg: 236.5     median: 238 (50%)     max: 241 Points
min: 255     avg: 279.2     median: 278 (58%)     max: 299 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1589     avg: 1757     median: 1736.5 (67%)     max: 1971 Points
min: 1163     avg: 1258     median: 1257.5 (48%)     max: 1352 Points
min: 1366     avg: 1669     median: 1685 (65%)     max: 1903 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.4     avg: 112.9     median: 125.7 (22%)     max: 176.1 Watt
min: 26.4     avg: 57.8     median: 56.6 (10%)     max: 79.2 Watt
min: 37.1     avg: 71.3     median: 65.9 (11%)     max: 168 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 88     avg: 138.3     median: 154.9 (28%)     max: 171.8 Watt
min: 31.5     avg: 57.8     median: 60.3 (11%)     max: 66.2 Watt
min: 46.9     avg: 91     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.87     avg: 11.2     median: 11.4 (8%)     max: 19.2 Watt
min: 3.12     avg: 6.6     median: 5.5 (4%)     max: 19.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 11.7     avg: 15.4     median: 13.1 (14%)     max: 28.8 Watt
min: 6.29     avg: 7.2     median: 7 (8%)     max: 8.44 Watt
min: 4.35     avg: 11     median: 7.5 (8%)     max: 90.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.8     avg: 30.5     median: 24.3 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt
min: 14.3     avg: 16.6     median: 15.2 (11%)     max: 24.7 Points per Watt
min: 17.7     avg: 32.1     median: 29.6 (22%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11300H → 63% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 93% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 17. 04:31:17

#0 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13058 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.026s ... 0.074s

#8 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.05s ... 0.125s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13058 +0.025s ... 0.149s

#10 got single benchmarks 13058 +0.06s ... 0.209s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.024s ... 0.233s

#12 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.093s ... 0.327s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.327s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.781s ... 1.107s

#15 return log +0.001s ... 1.108s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)