Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53 review: Affordable gaming laptop with RTX 3050

Raytracing for the middle class. Ray tracing was reserved for expensive high-end graphics cards in the past. With the GeForce RTX 3050 (Ti), Nvidia now brings the exciting technology to the mid-range range. We test the GPU with the Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇩🇪 🇮🇹 ...

The Acer Nitro 5, which is very popular due to its usually good price-performance ratio, exists in various CPU and GPU configurations. We took one of the cheapest models, the AN517-53-54DQ, and put it through its paces. The 17-incher, which wanders over the (virtual) counter for just under 1,000 Euro (~$1180), can fall back on a quad-core processor from Intel's current Tiger-Lake generation, more precisely the Core i5-11300H.

Demanding graphics calculations (the notebook supports Nvidia's Optimus technology) are taken care of by the GeForce RTX 3050 laptop GPU, a brand new mid-range chip based on Nvidia's Ampere architecture. The operating system (Windows 10 Home 64 bit) is installed on a 512 GB NVMe SSD in M.2 format. The display is a matte IPS panel with 1,920 x 1,080 pixels and 144 Hz.

Buyers will have to make some concessions when it comes to the working memory. The installed 8 GB DDR4 RAM is only single-rank and only runs in single-channel mode, which sometimes costs more and sometimes results in less performance depending on the (3D) application.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ (Nitro 5 AN517 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-11300H 4 x 3.1 - 4.4 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 40 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H35
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU - 4096 MB, Core: 1500 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 75 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 461.79, Optimus
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR4-3200, Single-Channel, Single-Rank, 2 slots (one in use)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE NV173FHM-NX4 (BOE09B4), IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N, 512 GB 
, slots: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 (one in use) & 1x 2,5
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1 Combo (Mic/Headset)
Networking
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 404 x 280 ( = 0.98 x 15.91 x 11.02 in)
Battery
57 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 135 W Power Supply, Nitro Sense, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.568 kg ( = 90.58 oz / 5.66 pounds), Power Supply: 387 g ( = 13.65 oz / 0.85 pounds)
Price
999 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

The Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ's competitors include other affordable 17-inch gamers with quad-core CPUs and mid-range GPUs like the Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05, the MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR and the Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T, which are all still equipped with the old GeForce GTX 1650, the predecessor of the RTX 3050. We also compared the HP Omen 15-ek0456ng with a GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for the test.

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.1 %
08/2021
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
82.1 %
09/2020
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2.1 kg32 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.9 %
10/2020
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.9 kg26.2 mm17.30"1920x1080
78.5 %
04/2020
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.2 kg23.1 mm17.30"1920x1080
77.8 %
06/2019
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.7 kg26.6 mm17.30"1920x1080

Since the chassis is mostly identical to the recently reviewed Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7, we will not go into more detail about the chassis, the equipment (interfaces, etc.) and the input devices in this article. You can find the corresponding information in the linked review. The only striking change concerns the keyboard. Instead of a white lettered and RGB illuminated keyboard, the Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ offers a red model (both lettering and illumination).

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ

Size comparison

404 mm / 15.9 inch 280 mm / 11 inch 25 mm / 0.984 inch 2.6 kg5.66 lbs399.8 mm / 15.7 inch 279.4 mm / 11 inch 26.6 mm / 1.047 inch 2.7 kg5.95 lbs398.6 mm / 15.7 inch 290 mm / 11.4 inch 26.2 mm / 1.031 inch 2.9 kg6.42 lbs397 mm / 15.6 inch 260 mm / 10.2 inch 23.1 mm / 0.909 inch 2.2 kg4.78 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 240 mm / 9.45 inch 32 mm / 1.26 inch 2.1 kg4.71 lbs
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Communication

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1422 (1363min - 1490max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
  (758 - 1514, n=9)
1275 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (496 - 1645, n=159, last 2 years)
1157 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1050 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1030 (722min - 1235max) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
610 (562min - 651max) MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
201 (89min - 272max) MBit/s ∼14% -86%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1390 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1375 (1253min - 1402max) MBit/s ∼99%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
  (887 - 1670, n=9)
1356 MBit/s ∼98% -1%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1295 (1184min - 1487max) MBit/s ∼93% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=159, last 2 years)
1221 MBit/s ∼88% -11%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
905 (709min - 946max) MBit/s ∼65% -34%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
215 (199min - 221max) MBit/s ∼15% -84%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450137713871363133912531388136813951389138913761372137013901402137013811375136513751374138113721384138613771394138513991356137713871363133912531388136813951389138913761372137013901402137013811375136513751374138113721384138613771394138513991356145414311405139514121449137613971402142013981415143714181443142514161402149013911465140813711481145213631451140914531425Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1374 (1253-1402)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1422 (1363-1490)

Webcam

ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ: 12.13 ∆E min: 3.31 - max: 19.73 ∆E

Display - 144 Hz, but dark and colorless

Although the 144 Hz panel matches the Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7, the determined values deviate slightly in places. This is a typical phenomenon since there are always certain fluctuations in series production.

285
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
236
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NV173FHM-NX4 (BOE09B4)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 286 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 261.3 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 286 cd/m²
Contrast: 1243:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.92 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 4.73
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
37.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.175
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
BOE NV173FHM-NX4 (BOE09B4), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
LGD05FE, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
AU Optronics B173HAN04.3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
AU Optronics B173HAN04.7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
85%
7%
67%
Display P3 Coverage
36.7
69.41
89%
39.46
8%
62.35
70%
sRGB Coverage
55
97.12
77%
58.43
6%
89.06
62%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
37.9
71.22
88%
40.77
8%
63.69
68%
Response Times
36%
-52%
-39%
-63%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
24.8 ?(12.4, 12.4)
17 ?(9, 8)
31%
38.4 ?(19.6, 18.8)
-55%
34 ?(18, 16)
-37%
41 ?(20, 21)
-65%
Response Time Black / White *
18.8 ?(10.8, 8)
11 ?(7, 4)
41%
28 ?(15.6, 12.4)
-49%
26.4 ?(15.6, 10.8)
-40%
30 ?(16, 14)
-60%
PWM Frequency
Screen
18%
-5%
-21%
6%
Brightness middle
286
314
10%
326
14%
251.2
-12%
316
10%
Brightness
261
293
12%
304
16%
242
-7%
294
13%
Brightness Distribution
83
87
5%
89
7%
92
11%
84
1%
Black Level *
0.23
0.22
4%
0.25
-9%
0.34
-48%
0.32
-39%
Contrast
1243
1427
15%
1304
5%
739
-41%
988
-21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.92
2.51
49%
4.42
10%
4.5
9%
3.39
31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
19.29
4.42
77%
9.44
51%
20
-4%
5.56
71%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.73
1.71
64%
1.53
68%
3.91
17%
2.14
55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.9
3.26
-72%
5.8
-205%
4
-111%
3.17
-67%
Gamma
2.175 101%
2.42 91%
2.261 97%
2.25 98%
2.39 92%
CCT
6782 96%
6150 106%
6822 95%
5882 111%
7098 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
71
37.3
51
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
58.1
89
Total Average (Program / Settings)
27% / 21%
9% / 8%
-18% / -17%
3% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

While the black value (0.23 cd/m²) and the contrast (1,243:1) of our test device are convincing, the brightness is not impressive. An average of 261 cd/m² is sufficient for most indoor areas, but the 17-inch device clearly lacks brightness in brighter places (conservatory, terrace, etc.). We would expect an average of at least 300 cd/m² even for a budget gamer.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

However, the color space turns out to be the biggest weakness. 55% sRGB coverage and around 38% Adobe RGB coverage are very disappointing and make for a rather pale picture. Among the comparison devices, only the MSI GF75 performs similarly poorly. The same applies to the color accuracy, although the Lenovo Legion 5 also leaves something to be desired here.

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53 vs sRGB
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53 vs sRGB
Subpixel
Subpixel
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53 vs AdobeRGB
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53 vs AdobeRGB

The other rates are rather unspectacular. For example, the response time of just under 19 ms black-to-white and 25 ms gray-to-grey is neither bad nor particularly good. We could not determine flickering at reduced brightness. The viewing angles are on the usual IPS level.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17047 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Test conditions - Nitro Sense hardly offers any options

In contrast to other gaming notebooks from Acer, the preinstalled Nitro Sense tool has very few functions and options. Besides the fan control, you can only change the energy-saving plan. Our measurements were performed in the delivery state (see screenshot).

Nitro Sense
Nitro Sense

Performance - Modern mid-range components

A quad-core CPU indicates mid-range hardware as well as 8 GB of RAM and a GPU with 4 GB of VRAM. If you invest a bit more money, you can also get the Nitro 5 with high-end features (8-core CPU, 16 GB RAM, 6-8 GB GPU).

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark

Processor

As mentioned before, the Core i5-11300H is a quad-core model from the Tiger Lake series, which is finally no longer manufactured in the outdated 14 nm process that Intel used for years. The 10 nm CPU offers 8 MB L3 cache and can process up to 8 threads in parallel via Hyper-Threading. Compared to the classic 6- and 8-core chips, the TDP is only 35 instead of 45 watts. According to the HWiNFO tool, the processor in the Nitro 5 is set to 40 watts PL1 and 64 watts PL2. The clock - depending on the application and load - is between 3.1 and 4.4 GHz under load.

We checked how the CPU behaves over a long period of time using Cinebench R15. The Core i5-11300H's performance remained fairly constant in the loop and, as expected, placed itself above the old Core i5-10300H in the loop.

Cinebench R15 Multi long-term test

050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950985.71987.24981.19980.2967.61981.55976.47979.84983.82985.32988.73980.2985.71987.61974.07981.33986.85982.29983.07982.83953.06981.93983.04956.07974.45891.94899.06894.45897.44896.14889.42894.87894.67901.71894.73895.52902.36895.66886.62894.83894.41895.74897.28895.94892.42893.44897.93898.33898.94899.73898.84897.99899.99893.32898.41897.79896.42899.44899.12893.58898.98893.34901.33895.54897.93896.78898.86899.06896.52896.54898.47900.74901.84896.88894.27895.84891.96900.56896.92894.63539.07542.55541.73540.19541.49763.08899.02900.29902893.93895.96896.56898.69892.56899.54899.3899.28894.19898.19896.18898.8899.14901.06895.74899.58898.61892.84898.74902.4900.17896.94898.35900.05899.24900.5899.26897.36900.05898.41900.39839.42795.05781.51774.94772.68769.7769.25767.83765.52766770.94766.09765.61767.18764.69768.52766.55764.32766763.75763.68766.12766764.66768.14767.58765.92763.42764.88765.05764.06763.94765.54763.74764.04755.39764.26763.1767.12764.03764.39765.95764.57768.86766.21767.65767.72765.2768.51766.93742.45736.93738.23736.87736.68708.6703.21703.2704.6706.79704.19703.35703.74705.09705.58704.57706.66706.46706.03704.72704.63704704.88702.86703.66704.77705.58704.77703.53704.86705.75704.14706.3706.23703.36704.51703.72705.69706.75705.52Tooltip
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø980 (953.06-988.73)
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø897 (886.62-902.36)
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø850 (539.07-902.4)
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø768 (755.39-839.42)
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H: Ø709 (702.86-742.45)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
211 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 254, n=197, last 2 years)
203 Points ∼96% -4%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
190 Points ∼90% -10%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
180 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (123 - 211, n=5)
154 Points ∼73% -27%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
144 Points ∼68% -32%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
108 Points ∼51% -49%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 2804, n=208, last 2 years)
1606 Points ∼100% +62%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
989 (953.06min - 988.73max) Points ∼62%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
907 Points ∼56% -8%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (632 - 990, n=7)
856 Points ∼53% -13%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
839 (755.39min - 839.42max) Points ∼52% -15%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
742 Points ∼46% -25%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
548 Points ∼34% -45%
Cinebench R23
CPU (Single Core)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
1426 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (1352 - 1431, n=8)
1398 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1095 - 1619, n=88, last 2 years)
1369 Points ∼96% -4%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (4621 - 14363, n=89, last 2 years)
10926 Points ∼100% +66%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
6581 Points ∼60%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (3313 - 6581, n=7)
5506 Points ∼50% -16%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
546 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (523 - 548, n=8)
537 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 634, n=190, last 2 years)
500 Points ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
454 Points ∼83% -17%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
437 Points ∼80% -20%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
361 Points ∼66% -34%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
312 Points ∼57% -43%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=191, last 2 years)
3776 Points ∼100% +49%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
2533 Points ∼67%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
2240 Points ∼59% -12%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (1300 - 2533, n=7)
2111 Points ∼56% -17%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
1906 Points ∼50% -25%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
1659 Points ∼44% -35%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
1397 Points ∼37% -45%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (466 - 862, n=7)
602 Seconds * ∼100% -29%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
555 Seconds * ∼92% -19%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
528 Seconds * ∼88% -13%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
481.4 Seconds * ∼80% -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
466 Seconds * ∼77%
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 555, n=174, last 2 years)
313 Seconds * ∼52% +33%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2945 - 6174, n=175, last 2 years)
5246 MIPS ∼100% +6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
4969 MIPS ∼95%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4951 MIPS ∼94% 0%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (4784 - 4969, n=7)
4920 MIPS ∼94% -1%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
4662 MIPS ∼89% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
2945 MIPS ∼56% -41%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (15146 - 75612, n=175, last 2 years)
45078 MIPS ∼100% +76%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
25564 MIPS ∼57%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
24768 MIPS ∼55% -3%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (17573 - 25940, n=7)
22986 MIPS ∼51% -10%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
22139 MIPS ∼49% -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
15146 MIPS ∼34% -41%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (1342 - 1462, n=7)
1411 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
1400 Points ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1777, n=173, last 2 years)
1311 Points ∼93% -6%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
1241 Points ∼88% -11%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
1235 Points ∼88% -12%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
1143 Points ∼81% -18%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
703 Points ∼50% -50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=173, last 2 years)
7195 Points ∼100% +57%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4722 Points ∼66% +3%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4720 Points ∼66% +3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
4593 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (3631 - 5499, n=7)
4484 Points ∼62% -2%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
4032 Points ∼56% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
2783 Points ∼39% -39%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.13 - 19.8, n=174, last 2 years)
12.4 fps ∼100% +49%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
8.3 fps ∼67%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.78 fps ∼63% -6%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (4.32 - 8.38, n=7)
6.7 fps ∼54% -19%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
6.34 fps ∼51% -24%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
6.13 fps ∼49% -26%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
94.04 s * ∼100% -87%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
58.9 s * ∼63% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 113, n=167, last 2 years)
54.7 s * ∼58% -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
50.2 s * ∼53%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (43.6 - 54.2, n=7)
48.1 s * ∼51% +4%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
23.85 s * ∼25% +52%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
1.088 sec * ∼100% -79%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.676 sec * ∼62% -11%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.63 sec * ∼58% -3%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (0.6 - 0.631, n=7)
0.615 sec * ∼57% -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.609 sec * ∼56%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.4907 - 1.088, n=169, last 2 years)
0.58 sec * ∼53% +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
8663
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
30491
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11506
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
10.97 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
93.18 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.48 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
211 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
115 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
989 Points
Help

System performance

Despite the modest memory configuration, it is enough for the first place in the test field in the system benchmarks. PCMark 10 sees the Nitro 5 between 8% and 40% ahead of the competition, whereby the everyday Windows experience should feel very similar on all devices in terms of boot time and loading times, etc.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (3952 - 7884, n=176, last 2 years)
6141 Points ∼100% +8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
5705 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
 
5705 Points ∼93% 0%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
5301 Points ∼86% -7%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5127 Points ∼83% -10%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4339 Points ∼71% -24%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B
4077 Points ∼66% -29%
PCMark 10 Score
5705 points
Help

DPC latencies

Although the 17-incher shines with the lowest latency rates compared to the competition, the LatencyMon tool indicates possible problems with real-time processing of audio and video content.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3177.9 μs * ∼100% -132%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
2951.7 μs * ∼93% -116%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B
1687.8 μs * ∼53% -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
1369.2 μs * ∼43%

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

There is praise for the fast mass storage. While SATA III SSDs with a maximum of 500 - 600 MB/s were common in the budget sector in the past, fast PCIe/NVMe SSDs are slowly but surely part of the standard repertoire. The Nitro 5 offers a particularly powerful representative of this guild with the 512 GB version of the SK Hynix BC711, which leaves the NVMe models of the competitors behind, sometimes significantly.

Nice: If you want to expand the storage space, you will find a free M.2 slot and a 2.5-inch bay inside the case (suitable cable included).

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-31%
-41%
-38%
-48%
Write 4K
206.1
120
-42%
134.7
-35%
140.7
-32%
145
-30%
Read 4K
77.76
36.09
-54%
44.84
-42%
43.18
-44%
45.28
-42%
Write Seq
2842
1778
-37%
1053
-63%
1829
-36%
1301
-54%
Read Seq
2552
1362
-47%
1241
-51%
1095
-57%
1362
-47%
Write 4K Q32T1
583.3
429.1
-26%
499.8
-14%
431.7
-26%
249.1
-57%
Read 4K Q32T1
663.1
493.2
-26%
517.9
-22%
526.9
-21%
342.1
-48%
Write Seq Q32T1
3014
2935.8
-3%
1022
-66%
1831
-39%
1301
-57%
Read Seq Q32T1
3556
3226.6
-9%
2263
-36%
1708
-52%
1732
-51%
AS SSD
-30%
-46%
-94%
-64%
Seq Read
2858.63
2053
-28%
1635.09
-43%
1006.66
-65%
1546.12
-46%
Seq Write
2693.4
2562
-5%
913.26
-66%
1755.37
-35%
1181.67
-56%
4K Read
68.81
42.46
-38%
46.18
-33%
39.88
-42%
36.54
-47%
4K Write
154.53
97.18
-37%
101.74
-34%
111.64
-28%
109.22
-29%
4K-64 Read
1859.62
1414.07
-24%
772.82
-58%
751.42
-60%
611.97
-67%
4K-64 Write
1679.81
1471.46
-12%
745.21
-56%
402.63
-76%
436.61
-74%
Access Time Read *
0.043
0.079
-84%
0.05
-16%
0.084
-95%
0.113
-163%
Access Time Write *
0.028
0.039
-39%
0.037
-32%
0.151
-439%
0.034
-21%
Score Read
2214
1662
-25%
983
-56%
892
-60%
803
-64%
Score Write
2104
1825
-13%
938
-55%
690
-67%
664
-68%
Score Total
5451
4364
-20%
2399
-56%
2085
-62%
1869
-66%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-31% / -30%
-44% / -44%
-66% / -70%
-56% / -57%

* ... smaller is better

SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3556 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3014 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 663.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 583.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2552 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2842 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 77.76 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 206.1 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

085170255340425510595680765850935102011051190127513601445153016151403.121687.541689.211689.471689.891690.091690.091690.091690.091690.091690.31690.511690.511690.511690.721690.721690.931690.931690.931690.931690.931691.141691.141691.141691.141691.351691.351691.541691.561691.561691.561691.561691.771691.771691.981691.981692.191692.191692.191692.191692.41692.581692.8216931693.031693.451693.451693.451694.291694.71Tooltip
: Ø1686 (1403.12-1694.71)

Graphics card

The most interesting aspect for many users might be the GPU. While we were able to examine the mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti once or twice in the past, there have hardly been any benchmark results for the RTX 3050 so far. Compared to the RTX 3050 Ti, the DirectX 12 model has to make do with 2,048 instead of 2,560 shaders.

However, the performance primarily depends on the cooling system (keyword clock margin) and the set TGP. The latter varies between 35 and 80 watts for the RTX 3050 (without Dynamic Boost). In the case of the Nitro 5, it is 75 watts including Dynamic Boost, so it is a pretty good value that is in the upper third.

We see the limited video memory as the weak point. Both the RTX 3050 and the RTX 3050 Ti only have 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM (128-bit interface), which is no longer up-to-date in 2021 and especially in view of the VRAM requirements of many current games and has a negative impact on the future-proofing of the laptop. Even in the mid-range segment, at least 6 GB would be appropriate by now.

However, the Ampere GPU has an easy game against the old GTX 1650, which still had to do without ray tracing support. In the 3DMark tests, the lead is usually 30 to 40%. However, it does not quite reach the GTX 1660 Ti's level - that was to be expected beforehand.

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=197, last 2 years)
20306 Points ∼100% +59%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
14746 Points ∼73% +16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
12736 Points ∼63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
  (10497 - 12736, n=3)
11948 Points ∼59% -6%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9621 Points ∼47% -24%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9423 Points ∼46% -26%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9274 Points ∼46% -27%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (429 - 13210, n=201, last 2 years)
7763 Points ∼100% +59%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5735 Points ∼74% +17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
4888 Points ∼63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
  (3931 - 4888, n=4)
4601 Points ∼59% -6%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3506 Points ∼45% -28%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3461 Points ∼45% -29%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3455 Points ∼45% -29%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1925 - 43077, n=187, last 2 years)
26963 Points ∼100% +59%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
20056 Points ∼74% +18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
16967 Points ∼63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
  (13643 - 16967, n=3)
15851 Points ∼59% -7%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
13337 Points ∼49% -21%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
13168 Points ∼49% -22%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
12726 Points ∼47% -25%
3DMark 06 Standard
36425 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
43216 points
3DMark 11 Performance
14587 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
61606 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
24215 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
11041 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4877 points
Help

Gaming performance

Analogous to the synthetic benchmarks, the mobile GeForce RTX 3050 also ranks between the GTX 1650 (Ti) and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in the gaming course, whereby the frame rate sometimes tends more in one and sometimes more in the other direction depending on the game and VRAM consumption.

Overall, the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is fast enough to run most titles in the native resolution of 1,920 x 1,080 with high to maximum details. It only gets tight when ray tracing is enabled or very computationally intensive and/or moderately optimized games like Assassin's Creed Valhalla and Cyberpunk 2077, where even medium settings become a challenge. The RTX 3050 is hardly suitable for QHD and 4K games. For this, we recommend a high-end device with an GeForce RTX 3060 upwards.

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming -15!
 
95.2 pt ∼95%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD -66!
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
87.2 pt ∼87%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ -136!
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
68.2 pt ∼68%
MSI GP75 -234!
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
66.8 pt ∼67%
MSI GL75 -234!
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
59.8 pt ∼60%
Alan Wake Remastered
3840x2160 High Preset
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
34.9 (11.4min, 25.3P0.1, 27.6P1 - 55.3max) fps ∼100%
2560x1440 High Preset
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
65.5 (23.6min, 39.9P0.1, 44.2P1 - 105max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
45.8 (29.3min, 38.3P0.1, 40.5P1 - 72.1max) fps ∼70%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
42 (23.1min, 30.9P0.1, 37.4P1 - 59.4max) fps ∼64%
1920x1080 High Preset
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
82.6 (29.9min, 40.8P0.1, 50.9P1 - 186max) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (last 2 years)
79.2 fps ∼96%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
69 (33.2min, 41P0.1, 57.8P1 - 131max) fps ∼84%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
63.4 (34.3min, 39.9P0.1, 51.5P1 - 86.7max) fps ∼77%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
87.6 (29.1min, 42.5P0.1, 53.7P1 - 209max) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (last 2 years)
82.7 fps ∼94%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
80.5 (40.9min, 43P0.1, 66.5P1 - 146max) fps ∼92%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
73.2 (31.4min, 41.7P0.1, 59.2P1 - 129max) fps ∼84%
1920x1080 Low Preset
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
95.8 (37.6min, 47.1P0.1, 76.6P1 - 128max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
92.8 (10.4min, 22P0.1, 54.4P1 - 227max) fps ∼97%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
87.3 (36min, 42.4P0.1, 69P1 - 110max) fps ∼91%
Back 4 Blood
3840x2160 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
37.4 (19.3min, 19.5P0.1, 20.1P1 - 221max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
26.1 (12.4min, 12.5P0.1, 13P1 - 201max) fps ∼70%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
23.3 (11.3min, 11.5P0.1, 12.3P1 - 179max) fps ∼62%
2560x1440 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
74.3 (25.1min, 26.4P0.1, 34.4P1 - 282max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
52.7 (22.8min, 25.9P0.1, 28.1P1 - 330max) fps ∼71%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
49.1 (23.9min, 24.2P0.1, 26.2P1 - 248max) fps ∼66%
1920x1080 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (149 - 193, n=2, last 2 years)
171 fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
115 (63.4min, 64.9P0.1, 73.4P1 - 330max) fps ∼67%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
83.8 (45.5min, 45.8P0.1, 49.7P1 - 281max) fps ∼49%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
75 (38.7min, 40.3P0.1, 43.8P1 - 240max) fps ∼44%
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (163 - 205, n=2, last 2 years)
184 fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
126 (57.9min, 70.9P0.1, 83.4P1 - 264max) fps ∼68%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
91.5 (47.3min, 48.1P0.1, 54.2P1 - 287max) fps ∼50%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
82.3 (41.8min, 44.8P0.1, 49.4P1 - 247max) fps ∼45%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) AA:FX
Average of class Gaming
  (195 - 220, n=2, last 2 years)
208 fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
146 (57.2min, 75.2P0.1, 97.6P1 - 328max) fps ∼70%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
106 (51.3min, 57.1P0.1, 63.7P1 - 341max) fps ∼51%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
96 (31.8min, 51P0.1, 57.2P1 - 286max) fps ∼46%
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12)
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
197 (24.8min, 96.1P0.1, 124P1 - 379max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
157 (26.9min, 89.7P0.1, 100P1 - 357max) fps ∼80%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
147 (22.1min, 84.5P0.1, 92.3P1 - 337max) fps ∼75%
Far Cry 6
2560x1440 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (last 2 years)
63 fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
48 (33min) fps ∼76%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
33 (20min) fps ∼52%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
30 (17min) fps ∼48%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (53 - 87, n=4, last 2 years)
74.5 fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
68 (41min) fps ∼91%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
50 (35min) fps ∼67%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
46 (42min) fps ∼62%
1920x1080 High Graphics Quality AA:T
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
78 (46min) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (17 - 97, n=5, last 2 years)
72.2 fps ∼93%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
57 (35min) fps ∼73%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
54 (31min) fps ∼69%
1920x1080 Medium Graphics Quality AA:SM
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
89 (52min) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (21 - 105, n=5, last 2 years)
81.4 fps ∼91%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
67 (45min) fps ∼75%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
63 (41min) fps ∼71%
1920x1080 Low Graphics Quality
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
102 (60min) fps ∼100%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
80 (47min) fps ∼78%
Average of class Gaming
  (25 - 116, n=3, last 2 years)
79.3 fps ∼78%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
75 (48min) fps ∼74%
FIFA 22
3840x2160 Ultra Rendering Quality AA:4x MS
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
135 (64.3min, 83.1P0.1, 107P1 - 261max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
82.6 (50.6min, 52.7P0.1, 58.3P1 - 166max) fps ∼61%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
75.8 (43min, 49.1P0.1, 52.9P1 - 206max) fps ∼56%
2560x1440 Ultra Rendering Quality AA:4x MS
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
203 (70.9min, 104P0.1, 143P1 - 285max) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (last 2 years)
130 fps ∼64%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
122 (58.8min, 68.6P0.1, 73.2P1 - 301max) fps ∼60%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
116 (12.6min, 66P0.1, 73P1 - 241max) fps ∼57%
1920x1080 Ultra Rendering Quality AA:4x MS
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
214 (25.8min, 107P0.1, 155P1 - 299max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
154 (53.7min, 69.3P0.1, 88.3P1 - 316max) fps ∼72%
Average of class Gaming
  (78.1 - 217, n=3, last 2 years)
153 fps ∼71%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
143 (23.5min, 74.7P0.1, 83.3P1 - 265max) fps ∼67%
1920x1080 High Rendering Quality AA:2x MS
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
215 (84.5min, 128P0.1, 155P1 - 296max) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 224, n=2, last 2 years)
198 fps ∼92%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
173 (14.3min, 75.9P0.1, 100P1 - 316max) fps ∼80%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
161 (77min, 87.4P0.1, 96.4P1 - 287max) fps ∼75%
1920x1080 Medium Rendering Quality
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
224 (17.8min, 105P0.1, 161P1 - 311max) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (177 - 229, n=2, last 2 years)
203 fps ∼91%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
174 (18.5min, 93P0.1, 110P1 - 304max) fps ∼78%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
166 (56min, 90.3P0.1, 103P1 - 290max) fps ∼74%
1920x1080 Low Rendering Quality
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
227 (19.1min, 138P0.1, 164P1 - 299max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
207 (15.5min, 131P0.1, 144P1 - 303max) fps ∼91%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
167 (19.7min, 102P0.1, 111P1 - 272max) fps ∼74%
New World
3840x2160 Very High Video Quality
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
17.8 (5.09min, 8.67P0.1, 12.3P1 - 44.5max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
12.2 (8.39min, 8.65P0.1, 9.22P1 - 17max) fps ∼69%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
10.4 (7.09min, 7.24P0.1, 7.93P1 - 14.9max) fps ∼58%
2560x1440 Very High Video Quality
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
38 (18.7min, 20.3P0.1, 23.7P1 - 104max) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (last 2 years)
31.3 fps ∼82%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
25.3 (12.7min, 15.6P0.1, 18.4P1 - 39.2max) fps ∼67%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
18.1 (5.5min, 9.59P0.1, 12.9P1 - 30.8max) fps ∼48%
1920x1080 Very High Video Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (12.2 - 86.8, n=6, last 2 years)
58.5 fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
50 (18.6min, 19.9P0.1, 24.8P1 - 128max) fps ∼85%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
36.4 (15.9min, 19.1P0.1, 22.2P1 - 66.5max) fps ∼62%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
30.6 (9.86min, 12.8P0.1, 19.9P1 - 67.2max) fps ∼52%
1920x1080 High Video Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 94.8, n=6, last 2 years)
68.8 fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
55.9 (16.5min, 24P0.1, 30.5P1 - 122max) fps ∼81%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
48.6 (23.4min, 28.4P0.1, 31.3P1 - 90.1max) fps ∼71%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
41.9 (15.6min, 16.3P0.1, 22.2P1 - 91.1max) fps ∼61%
1920x1080 Medium Video Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (16.4 - 96.8, n=6, last 2 years)
72 fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
57.9 (19.5min, 23P0.1, 29.2P1 - 148max) fps ∼80%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
53.7 (27.3min, 29.8P0.1, 35.2P1 - 114max) fps ∼75%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
44.4 (14.8min, 20.6P0.1, 23.6P1 - 110max) fps ∼62%
1920x1080 Low Video Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.9 - 121, n=3, last 2 years)
76.8 fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
66.8 (26.8min, 29.3P0.1, 35.1P1 - 146max) fps ∼87%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
62.3 (29.5min, 31.7P0.1, 37.9P1 - 131max) fps ∼81%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
54.3 (18.6min, 23.7P0.1, 29.4P1 - 105max) fps ∼71%
Deathloop
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
21 (13.7min, 16.5P0.1, 18.8P1 - 25.6max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
11.9 (9.29min, 9.33P0.1, 10P1 - 15.8max) fps ∼57%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
8.11 (6.26min, 6.48P0.1, 7.11P1 - 10.6max) fps ∼39%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
40.1 (21.2min, 33.7P0.1, 34.7P1 - 50.2max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
26.3 (11.7min, 13.7P0.1, 22.3P1 - 89.4max) fps ∼66%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
22.1 (12.3min, 14.9P0.1, 17.9P1 - 40.6max) fps ∼55%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (42.2 - 90.1, n=5, last 2 years)
64.9 fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
57.4 (25.9min, 43.3P0.1, 45.9P1 - 79.1max) fps ∼88%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
40.4 (17min, 20.9P0.1, 33.2P1 - 99.9max) fps ∼62%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
34.3 (14.9min, 19.9P0.1, 27.2P1 - 85.9max) fps ∼53%
1920x1080 High Preset
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
65.6 (26.1min, 49.4P0.1, 52.6P1 - 91.2max) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.7 - 106, n=6, last 2 years)
64 fps ∼98%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
43.8 (17.5min, 18.5P0.1, 36.6P1 - 58.9max) fps ∼67%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
37.3 (15.1min, 15.6P0.1, 27.3P1 - 50.9max) fps ∼57%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
81.5 (18.5min, 60.4P0.1, 68.3P1 - 162max) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.1 - 117, n=5, last 2 years)
75.5 fps ∼93%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
56.4 (19.7min, 43.6P0.1, 47.2P1 - 73.4max) fps ∼69%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
51.2 (17.5min, 26.3P0.1, 39.7P1 - 94.7max) fps ∼63%
1920x1080 Low Preset
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
92.8 (15.6min, 18.5P0.1, 74.8P1 - 139max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
64.6 (20.1min, 45.4P0.1, 50.9P1 - 146max) fps ∼70%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
59 (18.7min, 36.8P0.1, 46.4P1 - 103max) fps ∼64%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.6 - 79.6, n=2, last 2 years)
50.1 fps ∼54%
Monster Hunter Stories 2
3840x2160 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (60.5 - 118, n=2, last 2 years)
89.3 fps ∼100% +48%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
68.2 (18.9min, 24.2P0.1, 28.5P1 - 87.5max) fps ∼76% +13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
60.5 (17.4min, 17.6P0.1, 22.5P1 - 82.8max) fps ∼68%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
57.9 (45.5min, 46P0.1, 47.6P1 - 67max) fps ∼65% -4%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
50.4 (38.9min, 39.6P0.1, 41.2P1 - 58max) fps ∼56% -17%
2560x1440 High Preset
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
117 (32.4min, 51.3P0.1, 80.8P1 - 139max) fps ∼100% +49%
Average of class Gaming
  (78.4 - 143, n=2, last 2 years)
111 fps ∼95% +42%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
93.9 (53.7min, 69P0.1, 75.6P1 - 109max) fps ∼80% +20%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
82.4 (56.5min, 60.4P0.1, 65.1P1 - 94.8max) fps ∼70% +5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
78.4 (16min, 16.3P0.1, 19.6P1 - 127max) fps ∼67%
1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (91.4 - 144, n=7, last 2 years)
136 fps ∼100% +49%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
134 (55.4min, 89.9P0.1, 98.5P1 - 156max) fps ∼99% +47%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
120 (81.9min, 84.9P0.1, 93.8P1 - 143max) fps ∼88% +31%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
107 (73.9min, 76P0.1, 80.4P1 - 124max) fps ∼79% +17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
91.4 (16.4min, 16.7P0.1, 19.4P1 - 155max) fps ∼67%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
135 (63.8min, 89.4P0.1, 100P1 - 161max) fps ∼100% +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (95.6 - 144, n=5, last 2 years)
134 fps ∼99% +40%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
132 (68.7min, 81P0.1, 98.7P1 - 153max) fps ∼98% +38%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
118 (60.7min, 81.6P0.1, 87.9P1 - 136max) fps ∼87% +23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
95.6 (16.6min, 16.7P0.1, 20.1P1 - 168max) fps ∼71%
1920x1080 Low Preset
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
143 (91.7min, 104P0.1, 110P1 - 165max) fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
136 (72.7min, 95P0.1, 112P1 - 161max) fps ∼95%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
132 (86.3min, 89.1P0.1, 95.2P1 - 152max) fps ∼92%
F1 2021
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (12 - 47, n=3, last 2 years)
32 fps ∼100% +167%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
12 (9min) fps ∼38%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (30 - 89.8, n=5, last 2 years)
62.8 fps ∼100% +109%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
30 (25min) fps ∼48%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (55 - 119, n=14, last 2 years)
87.8 fps ∼100% +60%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
55 (46min) fps ∼63%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (32.1 - 218, n=15, last 2 years)
146 fps ∼100% +27%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
120 (106min) fps ∼82% +4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
115 (98min) fps ∼79%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
101 (90min) fps ∼69% -12%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
90 (79min) fps ∼62% -22%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (41.9 - 255, n=13, last 2 years)
164 fps ∼100% +14%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
149 (126min) fps ∼91% +3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
144 (120min) fps ∼88%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
123 (108min) fps ∼75% -15%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
109 (95min) fps ∼66% -24%
1920x1080 Ultra Low Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 211, n=3, last 2 years)
193 fps ∼100%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
181 (157min) fps ∼94%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
152 (128min) fps ∼79%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
138 (120min) fps ∼72%
Days Gone
3840x2160 Very High Preset
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
24.1 (17.2min, 17.4P0.1, 19.9P1 - 37.2max) fps ∼100% +16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
20.8 (14.7min, 14.8P0.1, 17.3P1 - 31.7max) fps ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (last 2 years)
20.8 fps ∼86% 0%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
16.5 (13.9min, 14.1P0.1, 14.9P1 - 21max) fps ∼68% -21%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
15.6 (9.39min, 12P0.1, 14P1 - 32max) fps ∼65% -25%
2560x1440 Very High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 79.5, n=5, last 2 years)
51.6 fps ∼100% +38%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
43.4 (25.5min, 27.6P0.1, 32.4P1 - 93max) fps ∼84% +16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
37.3 (23.4min, 25.5P0.1, 28.5P1 - 61.5max) fps ∼72%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
30.1 (16.7min, 22.3P0.1, 24.9P1 - 73.2max) fps ∼58% -19%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
28.3 (20min, 20.3P0.1, 23.4P1 - 63.8max) fps ∼55% -24%
1920x1080 Very High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (16.4 - 106, n=15, last 2 years)
77.2 fps ∼100% +50%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
60.7 (19.1min, 31.4P0.1, 42.9P1 - 128max) fps ∼79% +18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
51.6 (21.5min, 26.2P0.1, 36.3P1 - 94.4max) fps ∼67%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
42.4 (16min, 27.4P0.1, 33.8P1 - 92.7max) fps ∼55% -18%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
40.1 (15.1min, 24.9P0.1, 31.6P1 - 80.6max) fps ∼52% -22%
1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (10.8 - 140, n=16, last 2 years)
95.7 fps ∼100% +37%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
83.3 (35.3min, 43.8P0.1, 56.9P1 - 208max) fps ∼87% +19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
69.9 (22.4min, 31.9P0.1, 44.5P1 - 156max) fps ∼73%
MSI GP75
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
59.1 (25.4min, 32.7P0.1, 43.8P1 - 134max) fps ∼62% -15%
MSI GL75
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
55.5 (21.8min, 33.5P0.1, 41.6P1 - 114max) fps ∼58% -21%
1920x1080 Medium Preset