Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8565U vs Intel Core i3-N305

Intel Core i7-8565U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8565U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation that was announced in August 2018 (IFA). Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i7-8550U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i7-8565U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 4,6 GHz (versus 4 GHz of the i7-8550U) for a single core and 4.1 GHz (versus 3.7 GHz) of all cores (4.1 GHz for 2 cores). The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Compared to the slower Core i5-8265U and i3-8145U, the i7 supports Thermal Velocity Boost.

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same microarchitecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8565U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additional Turbo  clock speed can be made use of. It looks like Intel is promoting the i7 to be 3 - 11% faster than the previous i7-8550U, with Cinebench R15 Multi reaching 5% gains.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory, it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i3-N305

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N305

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the N305, as of September 2023. Expect the chip to be 50% to 100% faster than the N95 (4 cores, 4 threads, up to 3.4 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solutuion of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 15 W and can be configured down to 9 W. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Core i7-8565UIntel Core i3-N305
CodenameWhiskey Lake-UAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i7-8665U compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8565U « 1.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 « 1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4600 MHz1800 - 3800 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB768 KB
L2 Cache1 MB4 MB
L3 Cache8 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
SocketBGA1528BGA1264
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) (1000 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.105 °C
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8565U
27.9 pt (46%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N305
26.9 pt (45%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
65 Points (33%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
324 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 4832     avg: 5049     median: 5092 (5%)     max: 5181 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 939     avg: 983     median: 995 (40%)     max: 1001 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 342     avg: 409.3     median: 411.5 (45%)     max: 472 Points
min: 375     avg: 377     median: 376 (41%)     max: 380 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 954     avg: 1257     median: 1181.5 (3%)     max: 1645 Points
min: 1855     avg: 1943     median: 1976 (5%)     max: 1998 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 452     avg: 612     median: 608.5 (4%)     max: 815 Points
min: 828     avg: 845     median: 829 (5%)     max: 878 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 138.3     avg: 172.5     median: 173 (48%)     max: 193 Points
min: 163.6     avg: 165.1     median: 164.7 (46%)     max: 167 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.09     avg: 6.3     median: 6.8 (9%)     max: 7.4 Points
min: 10.6     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (15%)     max: 12.05 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.65     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (46%)     max: 2.16 Points
min: 2.04     avg: 2     median: 2 (49%)     max: 2.05 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2682     avg: 6571     median: 6644 (40%)     max: 8906 Points
min: 5622     avg: 5651     median: 5651 (34%)     max: 5680 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 13806     avg: 17608     median: 16760 (12%)     max: 23118 Points
min: 25813     avg: 26169     median: 26168.5 (19%)     max: 26524 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 14542     avg: 21376     median: 21661 (14%)     max: 26851 Points
min: 39133     avg: 39930     median: 39929.5 (26%)     max: 40726 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5474     avg: 8104     median: 8809.5 (11%)     max: 9435 Points
min: 8648     avg: 8708     median: 8708 (11%)     max: 8768 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 263.3     avg: 353.4     median: 360.2 (4%)     max: 420 s
min: 246.308     avg: 1175     median: 1174.7 (14%)     max: 2103.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.812     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (2%)     max: 12.41 s
min: 8.142     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 63.4 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3537     avg: 4129     median: 4291.5 (7%)     max: 4626 Points
min: 3300     avg: 3377     median: 3377 (5%)     max: 3454 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 10531     avg: 17993     median: 18860 (11%)     max: 24847 MIPS
min: 18739     avg: 20902     median: 21159.5 (12%)     max: 22551 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2029     avg: 4558     median: 4737 (56%)     max: 5923 MIPS
min: 3871     avg: 4033     median: 4105 (48%)     max: 4123 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 29.35     avg: 33.8     median: 33.7 (1%)     max: 38.8 fps
min: 55.6     avg: 55.9     median: 55.9 (1%)     max: 56.2 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 127.5     avg: 144.4     median: 140.9 (4%)     max: 160.2 fps
min: 201.6     avg: 202.6     median: 202.6 (5%)     max: 203.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.24     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (8%)     max: 5.5 fps
min: 5.41     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (10%)     max: 5.62 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.347     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (13%)     max: 0.516 GB/s
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (16%)     max: 0.539 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.567     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.869 GB/s
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (18%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.2     avg: 4.2     median: 4 (10%)     max: 5.1 GB/s
min: 5.1     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 1152     avg: 1215     median: 1245 (16%)     max: 1246.91 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 687     avg: 821     median: 806.5 (6%)     max: 1175 Seconds
min: 583     avg: 598     median: 589 (4%)     max: 622 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.682     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.851 sec
min: 0.766     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.786 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2813     avg: 5806     median: 6158 (13%)     max: 7928 Points
9081 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.286     avg: 8.5     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.889 s
min: 17.549     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.9     avg: 19.3     median: 19 (1%)     max: 20.61 s
36.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 491.1     avg: 520     median: 508 (2%)     max: 583 s
min: 744.681     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 772 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 16249     avg: 20521     median: 20544 (16%)     max: 25525 Points
min: 28884     avg: 28911     median: 28910.5 (22%)     max: 28937 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3083     avg: 6977     median: 6739 (17%)     max: 9422 Points
min: 8651     avg: 8896     median: 8926 (22%)     max: 9111 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 18314     avg: 43687     median: 46109 (37%)     max: 58024 Points
55544 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 19795     avg: 41691     median: 40823 (33%)     max: 57796 Points
56367 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 22018     avg: 45134     median: 49602 (40%)     max: 60319 Points
61854 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2413     avg: 5785     median: 5756 (15%)     max: 8032 Points
min: 8263     avg: 8470     median: 8567 (22%)     max: 8580 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3409     avg: 8376     median: 8361 (15%)     max: 11865 Points
min: 11357     avg: 11598     median: 11625 (21%)     max: 11813 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1354     avg: 2953     median: 2841 (12%)     max: 3880 Points
min: 3455     avg: 3514     median: 3493 (15%)     max: 3593 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 1146     avg: 1274     median: 1311 (30%)     max: 1326 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 4329     avg: 4681     median: 4679.5 (18%)     max: 5034 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
1261 Points (40%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 i3-N305 +
4584 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1108     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (38%)     max: 1163 Points
min: 997     avg: 1050     median: 1060.5 (36%)     max: 1083 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2839     avg: 3074     median: 3073.5 (6%)     max: 3308 Points
min: 4492     avg: 4651     median: 4603 (8%)     max: 4905 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1103     avg: 1186     median: 1197 (5%)     max: 1229 Points
min: 1006     avg: 1044     median: 1053 (5%)     max: 1072 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2643     avg: 3228     median: 3176 (10%)     max: 3803 Points
min: 4218     avg: 4496     median: 4497 (14%)     max: 4774 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2357     avg: 5053     median: 5142.5 (51%)     max: 5547 Points
min: 4469     avg: 4633     median: 4632.5 (46%)     max: 4796 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8142     avg: 14179     median: 13888 (14%)     max: 16968 Points
min: 16566     avg: 17128     median: 17128 (17%)     max: 17690 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4701     avg: 4750     median: 4759 (53%)     max: 4791 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11576     avg: 13367     median: 13617.5 (18%)     max: 14655 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10521     avg: 12071     median: 12302.5 (22%)     max: 13703 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3340     avg: 3882     median: 3851 (50%)     max: 4820 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11720     avg: 12845     median: 12844.5 (20%)     max: 13969 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4276     avg: 4294     median: 4294 (64%)     max: 4312 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 10320     avg: 10618     median: 10617.5 (56%)     max: 10915 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 7885     avg: 8316     median: 8315.5 (57%)     max: 8746 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 11135     avg: 11197     median: 11196.5 (22%)     max: 11258 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 10347     avg: 11305     median: 11305 (23%)     max: 12263 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 10402     avg: 10600     median: 10600 (28%)     max: 10798 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 730     avg: 1096     median: 1066 (1%)     max: 2622 ms
min: 708.5     avg: 917     median: 982.5 (1%)     max: 993 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 80.7     avg: 153.6     median: 152.7 (2%)     max: 228.3 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 13935     avg: 34603     median: 34884.5 (23%)     max: 49795 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 140.3     avg: 167.2     median: 167.2 (44%)     max: 194 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 176     avg: 208.4     median: 202 (36%)     max: 239 Points
min: 179.4     avg: 185.1     median: 185.4 (33%)     max: 190.4 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
1.6 MB/s (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
292.4 MB/s (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
43 MB/s (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
374.6 MB/s (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 i3-N305 +
11631 Points (41%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 881     avg: 937     median: 919.5 (34%)     max: 1027 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 22.9     avg: 26.5     median: 24.3 (4%)     max: 34.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
36.9 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3.01     avg: 4.4     median: 3.8 (3%)     max: 7.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5.18     avg: 6.5     median: 5.8 (4%)     max: 8.45 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 i3-N305 +
22.4 Points per Watt (17%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8565U → 100% n=43

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N305 → 115% n=43

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 13. 03:02:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10082 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14926 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765591342s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Dec 2025 05:18:44 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10082 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 10082 +0.059s ... 0.07s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14926 +0.004s ... 0.074s

#10 got single benchmarks 14926 +0.01s ... 0.084s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.063s ... 0.148s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.15s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)