Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

► remove from comparison AMD Z1 Extreme

The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports SMT (hyperthreading , 16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

The performance of the R7 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 7840U, the Z1 Extreme offers no AI engine.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 7840U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 7840U, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R7 PRO 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

ModelAMD Ryzen Z1 ExtremeIntel Core Ultra 7 155HAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
CodenamePhoenix (Zen 4)Meteor Lake-HPhoenix (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)Intel Meteor Lake-HAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4) Phoenix (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz3800 - 4800 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1616 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP30 Watt28 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm7 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Z1 Extreme
38.9 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
37.5 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 7840U
38.2 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96     avg: 102.7     median: 102.3 (57%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 323     avg: 776     median: 789 (15%)     max: 1024 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13004     avg: 14361     median: 14960 (14%)     max: 15120 Points
min: 9769     avg: 14965     median: 15028 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
min: 10576     avg: 13277     median: 13767 (13%)     max: 15142 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1733     avg: 1748     median: 1733 (73%)     max: 1779 Points
min: 1496     avg: 1726     median: 1743 (73%)     max: 1815 Points
min: 1703     avg: 1719     median: 1716 (72%)     max: 1747 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 672     avg: 679     median: 672 (73%)     max: 692 Points
min: 601     avg: 665     median: 670.5 (73%)     max: 696 Points
min: 652     avg: 666     median: 669 (73%)     max: 684 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5109     avg: 5576     median: 5794 (14%)     max: 5825 Points
min: 3798     avg: 5795     median: 5762.5 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
min: 4210     avg: 5202     median: 5377 (13%)     max: 5981 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2050     avg: 2261     median: 2336 (15%)     max: 2397 Points
min: 1932     avg: 2449     median: 2450 (15%)     max: 2880 Points
min: 1590     avg: 2096     median: 2218 (14%)     max: 2418 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 262     avg: 270     median: 268 (74%)     max: 280 Points
min: 99.6     avg: 249.5     median: 255 (71%)     max: 268 Points
min: 247     avg: 263     median: 265 (73%)     max: 273 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.11     avg: 30.5     median: 30.7 (40%)     max: 33.49 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.77     avg: 3     median: 3 (72%)     max: 3.13 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8808     avg: 9492     median: 9619.5 (58%)     max: 9919 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 50589     avg: 56540     median: 57550 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 13726     avg: 67393     median: 80420 (51%)     max: 95005 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12270     avg: 30347     median: 13508.5 (16%)     max: 82102 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 92.544     avg: 146.2     median: 139.6 (2%)     max: 206.526 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.523     avg: 3.8     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.041 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6137     avg: 6921     median: 6911.5 (11%)     max: 7723 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 56966     avg: 61359     median: 62657 (36%)     max: 64454 MIPS
min: 41739     avg: 59108     median: 60595 (35%)     max: 70254 MIPS
min: 34490     avg: 54214     median: 58386 (34%)     max: 62320 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6077     avg: 6197     median: 6196.5 (73%)     max: 6316 MIPS
min: 4594     avg: 5330     median: 5398 (64%)     max: 5621 MIPS
min: 5633     avg: 5871     median: 5900 (70%)     max: 5988 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 120.65     avg: 136.4     median: 135.4 (45%)     max: 154.15 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 282.57     avg: 302.1     median: 300.5 (69%)     max: 325 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.3     avg: 17.8     median: 18.4 (32%)     max: 18.7 fps
min: 9.93     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
min: 13.6     avg: 16.1     median: 16.5 (29%)     max: 17.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 9.3     avg: 10.3     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 365     avg: 392.3     median: 366 (5%)     max: 446 Seconds
min: 296     avg: 413.3     median: 380 (5%)     max: 692 Seconds
min: 354     avg: 440.6     median: 390 (5%)     max: 664 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 213     avg: 213.5     median: 213.5 (2%)     max: 214 Seconds
min: 175     avg: 232.5     median: 220 (2%)     max: 381 Seconds
min: 217     avg: 263.4     median: 237 (2%)     max: 380 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4447     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4662 sec
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.53 sec
min: 0.4658     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4807 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12066     avg: 12936     median: 12712.5 (27%)     max: 14729 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.046     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.087 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.701     avg: 16.2     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 17.277 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 394.754     avg: 413.2     median: 400.3 (2%)     max: 444.482 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 61131     avg: 65940     median: 63514 (49%)     max: 74620 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15202     avg: 18467     median: 18941.5 (47%)     max: 20784 Points
min: 6531     avg: 18376     median: 19092.5 (47%)     max: 23779 Points
min: 16111     avg: 17318     median: 17331.5 (43%)     max: 18499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 53255     avg: 77249     median: 77292.5 (63%)     max: 93608 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 66925     avg: 75901     median: 72861.5 (59%)     max: 90957 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 84880     avg: 88438     median: 88437.5 (73%)     max: 91995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15761 Points (40%)
min: 7073     avg: 15332     median: 15194 (38%)     max: 19549 Points
min: 16274     avg: 17360     median: 17641 (45%)     max: 18165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19305     avg: 23844     median: 24785 (44%)     max: 26499 Points
min: 5249     avg: 22618     median: 23177 (41%)     max: 28337 Points
min: 19497     avg: 22472     median: 23519 (42%)     max: 24045 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6281     avg: 8599     median: 8764.5 (37%)     max: 10587 Points
min: 3922     avg: 9000     median: 9454.5 (40%)     max: 12145 Points
min: 7179     avg: 8178     median: 8317 (35%)     max: 8657 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2530     avg: 2537     median: 2534 (63%)     max: 2550 Points
min: 1901     avg: 2377     median: 2409 (60%)     max: 2473 Points
min: 1896     avg: 2366     median: 2479 (62%)     max: 2508 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10872     avg: 11404     median: 11358.5 (44%)     max: 12026 Points
min: 7732     avg: 12275     median: 12385 (48%)     max: 13656 Points
min: 7596     avg: 10709     median: 11130 (43%)     max: 12069 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2518 Points (80%)
min: 2167     avg: 2588     median: 2313 (73%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
11285 Points (46%)
min: 10787     avg: 15361     median: 12061 (50%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1896     avg: 1917     median: 1907.5 (75%)     max: 1956 Points
min: 1462     avg: 1751     median: 1761.5 (69%)     max: 1824 Points
min: 1740     avg: 1824     median: 1853 (72%)     max: 1895 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9589     avg: 10256     median: 10258 (18%)     max: 10917 Points
min: 10017     avg: 12016     median: 12183.5 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
min: 9663     avg: 10246     median: 9968 (18%)     max: 10920 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1556     avg: 1678     median: 1696 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11112     avg: 11906     median: 12025 (38%)     max: 12530 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6559     avg: 6879     median: 6927 (69%)     max: 7141 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 39509     avg: 43123     median: 43897 (44%)     max: 46412 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 536     avg: 546     median: 546 (1%)     max: 556 ms
min: 416.4     avg: 541     median: 535 (1%)     max: 642 ms
min: 523     avg: 550     median: 562 (1%)     max: 571 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 86617     avg: 89260     median: 89260 (67%)     max: 91903 Points
min: 77142     avg: 88549     median: 89268 (67%)     max: 97162 Points
min: 85772     avg: 87443     median: 87442.5 (66%)     max: 89113 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 248     avg: 262.5     median: 262.5 (72%)     max: 277 Points
min: 166.4     avg: 251.8     median: 255 (70%)     max: 309 Points
min: 234     avg: 239.5     median: 239.5 (66%)     max: 245 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 300     avg: 345.3     median: 304 (55%)     max: 432 Points
min: 213     avg: 276.5     median: 278.5 (50%)     max: 299 Points
min: 259     avg: 283.4     median: 283 (51%)     max: 317 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1693     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (64%)     max: 1718 Points
min: 1366     avg: 1663     median: 1685.5 (63%)     max: 1903 Points
min: 1533     avg: 1606     median: 1595 (60%)     max: 1669 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.2     avg: 50.9     median: 50.9 (9%)     max: 59.6 Watt
min: 37.1     avg: 74.8     median: 72.8 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
min: 39.7     avg: 49.9     median: 53.1 (9%)     max: 57.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
64.7 Watt (12%)
min: 46.9     avg: 89.4     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
55.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.09     avg: 10.5     median: 10.4 (7%)     max: 12.8 Watt
min: 2.42     avg: 7.2     median: 6.1 (4%)     max: 24.2 Watt
min: 5.18     avg: 7     median: 6.9 (5%)     max: 8.88 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.95     avg: 7.7     median: 5.9 (7%)     max: 12.3 Watt
min: 2.83     avg: 10.1     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 90.3 Watt
min: 4.4     avg: 5.4     median: 5.2 (6%)     max: 7.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
36.1 Points per Watt (27%)
min: 17.7     avg: 30.9     median: 28.6 (21%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt
40 Points per Watt (30%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 99% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U → 96% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 03. 18:22:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15017 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 15058 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754238143s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Aug 2025 05:18:38 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15017 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 15017 +0.008s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#11 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.068s ... 0.093s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 15058 +0.004s ... 0.096s

#13 got single benchmarks 15058 +0.008s ... 0.105s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.105s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.083s ... 0.188s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.188s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)